Intensive Care Admission and Management of Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Cross-sectional Survey of the European Society of Intensive Care Medicine

Development and validation of a nomogram for predicting 28-day mortality in patients with ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND/AIM

We aimed to construct a validated nomogram model for predicting short-term (28-day) ischemic stroke mortality among critically ill populations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We collected raw data from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV database, a comprehensive repository renowned for its depth and breadth in critical care information. Subsequently, a rigorous analytical framework was employed, incorporating a 10-fold cross-validation procedure to ensure robustness and reliability. Leveraging advanced statistical methodologies, specifically the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator regression, variables pertinent to 28-day mortality in ischemic stroke were meticulously screened. Next, binary logistic regression was utilized to establish nomogram, then applied concordance index to evaluate discrimination of the prediction models. Predictive performance of the nomogram was assessed by integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) and net reclassification index (NRI). Additionally, we generated calibration curves to assess calibrating ability. Finally, we evaluated the nomogram's net clinical benefit using decision curve analysis (DCA), in comparison with scoring systems clinically applied under common conditions.

RESULTS

A total of 2089 individuals were identified and assigned into training (n = 1443) or validation (n = 646) cohorts. Various identified risk factors, including age, ethnicity, marital status, underlying metastatic solid tumor, Charlson comorbidity index, heart rate, Glasgow coma scale, glucose concentrations, white blood cells, sodium concentrations, potassium concentrations, mechanical ventilation, use of heparin and mannitol, were associated with short-term (28-day) mortality in ischemic stroke individuals. A concordance index of 0.834 was obtained in the training dataset, indicating that our nomogram had good discriminating ability. Results of IDI and NRI in both cohorts proved that our nomogram had positive improvement of predictive performance, compared to other scoring systems. The actual and predicted incidence of mortality showed favorable concordance on calibration curves (P > 0.05). DCA curves revealed that, compared with scoring systems clinically used under common conditions, the constructed nomogram yielded a greater net clinical benefit.

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a comprehensive array of fourteen readily accessible variables, a prognostic nomogram was meticulously formulated and rigorously validated to provide precise prognostication of short-term mortality within the ischemic stroke cohort.

Effect of admission in the stroke care unit versus intensive care unit on in-hospital mortality in patients with acute ischemic stroke

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Few reports have directly compared the outcomes of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) who are managed in a stroke care unit (SCU) with those who are managed in an intensive care units (ICU). This large database study in Japan aimed to compare in-hospital mortality between patients with AIS admitted into SCU and those admitted into ICU.

METHODS

Patients with AIS who were admitted between April 1, 2014, and March 31, 2019, were selected from the administrative database and divided into the SCU and ICU groups. We calculated the propensity score to match groups for which the admission unit assignment was independent of confounding factors, including the modified Rankin scale (mRS) score. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality, and secondary outcomes were the mRS score at discharge, length of stay (LOS), and total hospitalization cost.

RESULTS

Overall, 8,683 patients were included, and 960 pairs were matched. After matching, the in-hospital mortality rates of the SCU and ICU groups were not significantly different (5.9% vs. 7.9%, P = 0.106). LOS was significantly shorter (SCU = 20.9 vs. ICU = 26.2 days, P < 0.001) and expenses were significantly lower in the SCU group than in the ICU group (SCU = 1,686,588 vs. ICU = 1,998,260 yen, P < 0.001). mRS scores (score of 1-3 or 4-6) at discharge were not significantly different after matching. Stratified analysis showed that the in-hospital mortality rate was lower in the ICU group than in the SCU group among patients who underwent thrombectomy.

CONCLUSIONS

In-hospital mortality was not significantly different between the ICU and SCU groups, with significantly lower costs and shorter LOS in the SCU group than in the ICU group.

Efficacy of Early Intensive Blood Pressure Management After Thrombectomy: Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial (IDENTIFY)

BACKGROUND

The optimal strategy for blood pressure management after thrombectomy remains unknown. The primary objective of The Early Intensive Blood Pressure Management after Endovascular Thrombectomy (IDENTIFY) study is to explore the efficacy and safety of early intensive blood pressure management strategies after thrombectomy compared with that of standard management.

METHODS

The IDENTIFY study is a prospective, randomized, open-label, assessor-blinded multicenter clinical trial. Patients with acute anterior circulation ischaemic stroke who underwent endovascular thrombectomy within 6 h of stroke onset, achieved successful recanalization, and had two consecutive blood pressure readings > 130 mm Hg during the first 6 h after thrombectomy will be enrolled and centrally randomized into intensive or standard management groups in a 1:1 ratio. Continuous blood pressure monitoring will be initiated at the end of thrombectomy, and patients with high blood pressure during the transfer to the wards will also be enrolled. For patients in the intensive management group, the target blood pressure will be < 130 mm Hg, and the use of antihypertensive drugs will be discontinued if systolic blood pressure goes below 110 mm Hg. The target blood pressure for the standard management group will be < 180 mm Hg, and if systolic blood pressure decreases below 140 mm Hg, the use of antihypertensive drugs will be stepwise decreased until the systolic blood pressure reaches 140 mm Hg again or the infusion is discontinued. Patients will have their blood pressure reduced to the target range within 1 h from randomization and maintained until 24 h after thrombectomy with intravenous hypertensive drugs. A sample size of 600 was predicted. The primary outcome will be the rate of dependency (modified Rankin Scale scores 3-6) at 90 days. Secondary outcomes will include intracerebral hemorrhage (either symptomatic or asymptomatic) within 24 h and 7 days, malignant brain oedema, all-cause death, death and severe disability at 90 days, and quality of life at 90 days, which will be measured using the EuroQol-5 Dimensions-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) and the 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). Safety outcomes will include stroke recurrence within 24 h, early neurological deterioration, hypotension within 24 h, death within 7 days after endovascular thrombectomy, and all-cause acute kidney injury. Trial registration chictr.org.cn (identifier: ChiCTR2200057770). Registered March 17, 2022, http://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=162575&htm=4.

Acute ischemic stroke in a university hospital intensive care unit: 1-year costs and outcome

Background and purpose

Little is currently known about the cost‐effectiveness of intensive care of acute ischemic stroke (AIS). We evaluated 1‐year costs and outcome for patients with AIS treated in the intensive care unit (ICU).

Materials and methods

A single‐center retrospective study of patients admitted to an academic ICU with AIS between 2003 and 2013. True healthcare expenditure was obtained up to 1 year after admission and adjusted to consumer price index of 2019. Patient outcome was 12‐month functional outcome and mortality. We used multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify independent predictors of favorable outcomes and linear regression analysis to assess factors associated with costs. We calculated the effective cost per survivor (ECPS) and effective cost per favorable outcome (ECPFO).

Results

The study population comprised 154 patients. Reasons for ICU admission were: decreased consciousness level (47%) and need for respiratory support (40%). There were 68 (44%) 1 year survivors, of which 27 (18%) had a favorable outcome. High age (odds ratio [OR] 0.95, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.91–0.98) and high hospital admission National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score (OR 0.92, 95% CI 0.87–0.97) were independent predictors of poor outcomes. Increased age had a cost ratio of 0.98 (95% CI 0.97–0.99) per added year. The ECPS and ECPFO were 115,628€ and 291,210€, respectively.

Conclusions

Treatment of AIS in the ICU is resource‐intense, and in an era predating mechanical thrombectomy the outcome is often poor, suggesting a need for further research into cost‐efficacy of ICU care for AIS patients.

The intensive care management of acute ischaemic stroke

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To discuss recent advances in the critical care management of acute ischaemic stroke patients and highlight controversies and consensus.

RECENT FINDINGS

Intravenous thrombolysis and endovascular thrombectomy are standard of care reperfusion therapies that have revolutionized the management of acute ischaemic stroke and transformed outcomes for patients. They can now be delivered in extended time windows and to those previously ineligible for intervention based on advanced neuroimaging criteria. Secondary systemic insults, such as hypo- and hypertension, hyperthermia or hyperglycaemia, which can extend the area of ischaemia must also be prevented or corrected to minimize infarct progression. Meticulous blood pressure management is of central importance, particularly in patients that have undergone reperfusion therapies. Neurological deterioration can occur because of infarct extension, haemorrhagic transformation or worsening cerebral oedema. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography allows bedside, noninvasive evaluation of cerebral haemodynamics and is increasingly used in acute stroke triage, management and recovery prediction. The management of acute ischaemic stroke raises several ethical issues, and shared decision making is essential to ensure outcomes that are compatible with an individual patient's expectations.

SUMMARY

A bundle of medical, endovascular and surgical strategies implemented by a multidisciplinary team working to locally agreed protocols can improve long-term stroke outcomes.

Acute ischaemic stroke and its challenges for the intensivist

Acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) is responsible for almost 90% of all strokes and is one of the leading causes of death and disability. Acute ischaemic stroke is caused by a critical alteration in focal cerebral blood flow (ischaemia) from a variety of causes, resulting in infarction. The primary cerebral injury due to AIS occurs in the first hours, therefore early reperfusion importantly impacts on patient outcome ('Time is brain' concept). Secondary cerebral damage progressively evolves over the following hours and days due to cerebral oedema, haemorrhagic transformation, and cerebral inflammation. Systemic complications, such as pneumonia, sepsis, and deep venous thrombosis, could also affect outcome. The risk of a recurrent ischaemic stroke is in particular high in the first days, which necessitate particular attention. The role of intensive care unit physicians is therefore to avoid or reduce the risk of secondary damage, especially in the areas where the brain is functionally impaired and 'at risk' of further injury. Therapeutic strategies therefore consist of restoration of blood flow and a bundle of medical, endovascular, and surgical strategies, which-when applied in a timely and consistent manner-can prevent secondary deterioration due to cerebral and systemic complications and recurrent stroke and improve short- and long-term outcomes. A multidisciplinary collaboration between neurosurgeons, interventional radiologists, neurologists, and intensivists is necessary to elaborate the best strategy for the treatment of these patients.