Enhanced Recovery Implementation in Major Gynecologic Surgeries: Effect of Care Standardization

Influence of humanistic care on negative emotions, nursing quality, and patient satisfaction in outpatient gynecological surgery

OBJECTIVE

To explore the impact of humanistic care on negative emotions, nursing quality and patient satisfaction among women undergoing outpatient gynecological surgery.

METHODS

This retrospective study involved 108 patients who underwent outpatient gynecological surgery at the Second Affiliated Hospital of Zhejiang University of Traditional Chinese Medicine between August 2022 and August 2023. The patients were divided into two groups: 51 patients received routine care (control group) and 57 received humanistic care (experimental group). Data collected included vital signs (heart rate [HR] and systolic/diastolic blood pressure [SBP/DBP]), pain levels (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS] scores at 12 and 24 hours postoperative), negative emotions (Self-rating Anxiety/Depression Scale [SAS/SDS]), comfort (Kolcaba's General Comfort Questionnaire [GCQ]), sexual functioning (Brief Index of Sexual Functioning for Women), nursing quality (errors, defects, and complaints) and patient satisfaction.

RESULTS

Intraoperative SBP, DBP, along with HR, were significantly lower in the experimental group compared to the control group (all P<0.05). Postoperative pain levels at both 12 and 24 hours were also significantly reduced in the experimental group (both P<0.01). Furthermore, the experimental group demonstrated significant reductions in SAS and SDS scores and higher GCQ scores across physical, psychospiritual, environmental, and sociocultural dimensions (all P<0.05). There were no significant differences between the groups in terms of sexual desire, activity, and satisfaction (all P>0.05). Nursing quality was significantly better (P=0.029) and patient satisfaction with nursing care was higher (P=0.015) in the experimental group.

CONCLUSIONS

Humanistic care significantly reduces negative emotions and enhances comfort, nursing quality, and patient satisfaction in women undergoing outpatient gynecological surgery. This approach does not affect sexual functioning indicators but offers substantial improvements in overall patient care and outcomes. Its high value for clinical promotion underscores its potential as a transformative approach in outpatient gynecological settings.

Effect of Preoperative Bilateral Ultrasound-guided Quadratus Lumborum Nerve Block on Quality of Recovery after Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy in an Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Setting

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess the effect of preoperative bilateral ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum nerve block (QLB) on quality of recovery after minimally invasive hysterectomy, in an enhanced recovery after surgery setting.

DESIGN

Randomized, controlled, double-blinded trial (Canadian Task Force level I).

SETTING

University-affiliated tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

All women undergoing an elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy. Women with chronic pain, chronic anticoagulation, and body mass index >50 kg/m2 were excluded.

INTERVENTION

Patients were randomized with a 1:1 allocation, to one of the following 2 arms, and stratified based on robotic versus laparoscopic approach. 1. QLB: QLB (bupivacaine) + sham local trocar sites infiltration (normal saline) 2. Local infiltration: sham QLB (normal saline) + local infiltration (bupivacaine) MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The primary outcome was defined as the quality of recovery score based on the validated questionnaire Quality of Recovery, completed 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes included dynamic pain scores, accumulated opioid consumption up to 24 hours, postoperative nausea and vomiting, surgical complications, length of hospital stay, time to first pain medication administration in the postanesthesia care unit, and adverse events. A total of 76 women were included in the study. Demographic characteristics were similar in both groups. Median age was 44 years (interquartile range 39-50), 47% of the participants were African American, and mean body mass index was 32.8 kg/m2 (standard deviation [SD] 8.1). The mean Quality of Recovery score was 179.1 (SD ± 10.3) in the QLB and 175.6 (SD ± 9.7) for the local anesthesia group (p = .072). All secondary outcomes were comparable between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

QLBs do not significantly improve quality of recovery after elective robotic or laparoscopic hysterectomy compared with local anesthetic port site infiltration.

Enhanced recovery after liver surgery in cirrhotic patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Few studies have assessed enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in liver surgery for cirrhotic patients. The present meta-analysis assessed the impact of ERAS pathways on outcomes after liver surgery in cirrhotic patients compared to standard care.

METHODS

A literature search was performed on PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library. Studies comparing ERAS protocols versus standard care in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery were included. The primary outcome was post-operative complications, while secondary outcomes were mortality rates, length of stay (LoS), readmissions, reoperations, and liver failure rates.

RESULTS

After evaluating 41 full-text manuscripts, 5 articles totaling 646 patients were included (327 patients in the ERAS group and 319 in the non-ERAS group). Compared to non-ERAS care, ERAS patients had less risk of developing overall complications (OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.31-0.61, p < 0.001). Hospitalization was on average 2 days shorter for the ERAS group (mean difference - 2.04, 95% CI - 3.19 to - 0.89, p < 0.001). Finally, no difference was found between both groups concerning 90-day post-operative mortality and rates of reoperations, readmissions, and liver failure.

CONCLUSION

In cirrhotic patients, ERAS protocol for liver surgery is safe and decreases post-operative complications and LoS. More randomized controlled trials are needed to confirm the results of the present analysis.

Randomized Trial on Expectations and Pain Control Advancement in Surgery: The REPAIR Study

IMPORTANCE

Following standardized preoperative education and adoption of shared decision making positively affects postoperative narcotic practices.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to assess the impact of patient-centered preoperative education and shared decision making on the quantities of postoperative narcotics prescribed and consumed after urogynecologic surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

Women undergoing urogynecologic surgery were randomized to "standard" (standard preoperative education, standard narcotic quantities at discharge) or "patient-centered" (patient-informed preoperative education, choice of narcotic quantities at discharge) groups. At discharge, the "standard" group received 30 (major surgery) or 12 (minor surgery) pills of 5-mg oxycodone. The "patient-centered" group chose 0 to 30 (major surgery) or 0 to 12 (minor surgery) pills. Outcomes included postoperative narcotics consumed and unused. Other outcomes included patient satisfaction/preparedness, return to activity, and pain interference. An intention-to-treat analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 174 women; 154 were randomized and completed the major outcomes of interest (78 in the standard group, 76 in the patient-centered group). Narcotic consumption did not differ between groups (standard group: median of 3.5 pills, interquartile range [IQR] of [0, 8.25]; patient centered: median of 2, IQR of [0, 9.75]; P = 0.627). The patient-centered group had fewer narcotics prescribed ( P < 0.001) and unused ( P < 0.001), and chose a median of 20 pills (IQR [10, 30]) after a major surgical procedure and 12 pills (IQR [6, 12]) after a minor surgical procedure, with fewer unused narcotics (median difference, 9 pills; 95% confidence interval, 5-13; P < 0.001). There were no differences between groups' return to function, pain interference, and preparedness or satisfaction ( P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient-centered education did not decrease narcotic consumption. Shared decision making did decrease prescribed and unused narcotics. Shared decision making in narcotic prescribing is feasible and may improve postoperative prescribing practices.

The Effect of Implementing a Standardized Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Pain Management Pathway at an Urban Medical Center in Hawaii

Traditional use of opioids to treat postoperative pain may lead to abuse and overdose. The development of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols has helped to shift pain management from traditional methods to evidence-based best practices involving multimodal analgesia techniques. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement and determine the effectiveness of a standardized, evidence-based ERAS pain management pathway for patients undergoing colorectal or gynecology procedures at a medical center in Hawaii. After the intervention, the evaluation of data associated with opioid use, patients' pain scores, time spent in the postanesthesia care unit, and inpatient length of stay showed that most results were not significant. However, the ERAS pain management pathway did reduce clinical practice variations, intraoperative opioid administration, the time that patients spent in the postanesthesia care unit, and length of stay. The ERAS pain management pathway continues to be used and updated at this facility.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol Decreases Length of Stay and Postoperative Narcotic Use in Microvascular Breast Reconstruction

Background

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols have demonstrated efficacy following microvascular breast reconstruction. This study assesses the impact of an ERAS protocol following microvascular breast reconstruction at a high-volume center.

Methods

The ERAS protocol introduced preoperative counseling, multimodal analgesia, early diet resumption, and early mobilization to our microvascular breast reconstruction procedures. Data, including length of stay, body mass index, inpatient narcotic use, outpatient narcotic prescriptions, inpatient pain scores, and complications, were prospectively collected for all patients undergoing microvascular breast reconstruction between April 2019 and July 2021. Traditional pathway patients who underwent reconstruction immediately before ERAS implementation were retrospectively reviewed as controls.

Results

The study included 200 patients, 99 in traditional versus 101 in ERAS. Groups were similar in body mass index, age (median age: traditional, 54.0 versus ERAS, 50.0) and bilateral reconstruction rates (59.6% versus 61.4%). ERAS patients had significantly shorter lengths of stay, with 96.0% being discharged by postoperative day (POD) 3, and 88.9% of the traditional cohort were discharged on POD 4 (P < 0.0001). Inpatient milligram morphine equivalents (MMEs) were smaller by 54.3% in the ERAS cohort (median MME: 154.2 versus 70.4, P < 0.0001). Additionally, ERAS patients were prescribed significantly fewer narcotics upon discharge (median MME: 337.5 versus 150.0, P < 0.0001). ERAS had a lower pain average on POD 0-3; however, this finding was not statistically significant.

Conclusion

Implementing an ERAS protocol at a high-volume microvascular breast reconstruction center reduced length of stay and postoperative narcotic usage, without increasing pain or perioperative complications.

Effectiveness of an Educational Intervention with Guidelines from the Total Acceleration of Postoperative Recovery Project (ACERTO) in Gynecology

OBJECTIVE

 To evaluate the effectiveness of an educational intervention among gynecologists about recommendations of the Total Acceleration of Postoperative Recovery (ACERTO, in the Portuguese acronym) project derived from the solid foundations of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) guidelines to optimize hospital care for surgical-gynecological patients.

METHODS

 Educational intervention through monthly 1-hour long meetings (3 months), with the application of an objective questionnaire about specific knowledge of the ACERTO project between before and after educational intervention phases, for gynecologists, after approval by the ethics committee and signature of informed consent by participants, in a federal university hospital.

RESULTS

 Among the 25 gynecologists who agreed to participate, the educational intervention could be effective with a statistically significant difference between the phases before and after the intervention for the main recommendations of the ACERTO project, such as abbreviation of preoperative fasting (p = 0.006), venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (p = 0.024), knowledge and replication of ACERTO (p = 0.034), and multimodal analgesia (p = 0.021).

CONCLUSION

 An educational intervention, through clinical meetings with exposition and discussion of the recommendations of the ACERTO project based on the ERAS protocol can be effective for the knowledge and possibility of practical application of the main measures, such as abbreviation of preoperative fasting, multimodal analgesia, and prophylaxis of thrombosis among gynecologists.

Association of postoperative length of stay with outcomes following orthotopic heart transplantation-A national analysis

BACKGROUND

In the absence of standardized recovery protocols, there is little evidence to guide postoperative care to ensure optimal in-hospital and long-term outcomes following heart transplantation (HT). Using two national databases, we examined the association between postoperative length of stay (LOS) with patient/graft survival, index hospitalization costs, and non-elective readmissions.

METHODS

Adult HT recipients from 2010 to 2019 were identified and analyzed within the Organ Procurement and Transplantation Network (OPTN) Database and Nationwide Readmissions Database (NRD). The risk-adjusted relationship between 1-year mortality and LOS was assessed with restricted cubic splines and subsequently used to stratify patients into Expedited (7-11 days), Routine (12-16 days), and Delayed (>16) discharge groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using Restricted Means Survival Time analysis (RMST) and multivariable Cox models.

RESULTS

Of 9995 HT recipients within the OPTN, 3777 (38%) were categorized as Expedited, and 3040 (30%) as Routine. After adjustment, expedited discharge was not associated with inferior 90-day (ΔRMST -.01, p = .91) and 1-year patient survival (ΔRMST -.02, p = .53). Additionally, expedited was not associated with increased odds of non-elective readmission at 90-days (HR 1.04, CI .77-1.43) relative to Routine discharge. Counterfactual analysis revealed an estimated cost saving of $50 million if all Routine patients received an expedited discharge.

CONCLUSION

Expedited discharge after HT seems to be cost-effective and is not associated with inferior outcomes. Institutional-level outcome analyses should be performed to identify patients that would benefit from expedited discharge, and future studies should analyze the feasibility of implementing standardized discharge protocols following HT.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) for Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Oncology Surgery: A Review

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) has established benefits in open gynecologic oncology surgery. However, the benefits for gynecologic oncology patients undergoing minimally invasive surgery (MIS) are less well defined. We conducted a review of this topic after a comprehensive search of the peer-reviewed literature using MEDLINE and PubMed databases. Our search yielded 25 articles, 14 of which were original research articles, in 10 distinct patient cohorts describing ERAS in minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery. Major benefits of ERAS in MIS included: decreased length of stay and increased rates of same-day discharge, cost-savings, decreased opioid use, and increased patient satisfaction. ERAS in minimally invasive gynecologic oncology surgery is an area of great promise for both patients and the healthcare system.

Nonhome Discharge in Patients Undergoing Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery: A National Analysis

IMPORTANCE

Discharge to home after surgery has been recognized as a determinant of long-term survival and is a common concern in the elderly population.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to determine the incidence and risk factors for nonhome discharge in patients undergoing major surgery for pelvic organ prolapse.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective cohort study using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Database from 2010 to 2018. We included patients who underwent sacrocolpopexy, vaginal colpopexy, and colpocleisis. We compared perioperative characteristics in patients who were discharged home versus those who were discharged to a nonhome location. Stepwise backward multivariate logistic regression was then used to control for confounding variables and identify independent predictors of nonhome discharge.

RESULTS

A total of 38,012 patients were included in this study, 209 of whom experienced nonhome discharge (0.5%). Independent predictors of nonhome discharge included preoperative weight loss (adjusted odds ratio [aOR], 5.9; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3-27.5), dependent health care status (aOR, 5.0; 95% CI, 2.6-9.5), abdominal hysterectomy (aOR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.4-3.7), American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3 or greater (aOR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.5-2.7), age (aOR, 1.1; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09), operative time (aOR, 1.005; 95% CI, 1.003-1.006), laparoscopic hysterectomy (aOR, 0.6; 95% CI, 0.4-1.0), and laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (aOR, 0.5; 95% CI, 0.3-0.8).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients undergoing surgery for pelvic organ prolapse, nonhome discharge is associated with various indicators of frailty, including age, health care dependence, and certain comorbidities. An open surgical approach increases the risk of nonhome discharge, while a laparoscopic approach is associated with lower risk.

Enhanced Recovery after Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

The objective of this study was to review on the influence of enhanced rehabilitation in pelvic organ prolapse surgery outcomes, specifically focusing on length of hospital stay, hospital costs, pain, morbidity, and patient satisfaction. Following the PRISMA model and using PubMed as a source, eight articles pertaining to prolapse surgery and two articles concerning vaginal hysterectomies were selected, all published between 2014 and 2021. These studies revealed no significant difference in terms of operating time, intra- and post-operative complications, intra-operative blood loss and post-operative pain scores before and after the introduction of the ERAS program. Only one study noted a difference in readmission rates. There was, however, a noticeable decrease in intra-operative and post-operative intravenous intakes, opioid administration, length of stay, and overall hospital costs with the adoption of ERAS. Additionally, with ERAS, patients were able to mobilize more rapidly, and overall patient satisfaction significantly improved.

Can robotic-assisted surgery support enhanced recovery programs?

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols comprise a multimodal approach to optimize patient outcome and recovery. ERAS guidelines recommend minimally invasive surgery (MIS) when possible. Key components in MIS include preoperative patient education and optimization; multimodal and narcotic-sparing analgesia; prophylactic measures regarding nausea, infection, and venous thrombosis; maintenance of euvolemia; and promotion of the early activity. ERAS protocols in MIS improve outcome mainly in terms of reduced length of stay and subsequently reduced cost. In addition, ERAS protocols in MIS reduce postoperative pain and nausea, increase patient satisfaction, and might reduce the rate of postoperative complications. Robotic surgery supports ERAS through facilitating MIS in complex procedures where laparotomy is an alternative approach.

Prehabilitation in an ERAS program for endometrial cancer patients: impact on post-operative recovery

OBJECTIVES

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) and prehabilitation programs are multidisciplinary care pathways that aim to reduce stress response and improve perioperative outcomes. However, literature is limited regarding the impact of ERAS and prehabilitation in gynecologic oncology surgery. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of implementing an ERAS and prehabilitation program on post-operative outcomes of endometrial cancer patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery.

METHODS

We evaluated consecutive patients undergoing laparoscopy for endometrial cancer that followed ERAS and the prehabilitation program at a single center. A pre-intervention cohort that followed the ERAS program alone was identified. The primary outcome was length of stay, and secondary outcomes were normal oral diet restart, post-operative complications and readmissions.

RESULTS

A total of 128 patients were included: 60 patients in the ERAS group and 68 patients in the prehabilitation group. The prehabilitation group had a shorter length of hospital stay of 1 day (p<0.001) and earlier normal oral diet restart of 3.6 hours (p=0.005) in comparison with the ERAS group. The rate of post-operative complications (5% in the ERAS group and 7.4% in the prehabilitation group, p=0.58) and readmissions (1.7% in the ERAS group and 2.9% in the prehabilitation group, p=0.63) were similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The integration of ERAS and a prehabilitation program in endometrial cancer patients undergoing laparoscopy significantly reduced hospital stay and time to first oral diet as compared with ERAS alone, without increasing overall complications or the readmissions rate.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Program for Patients with Peritoneal Surface Malignancies Undergoing Cytoreductive Surgery with or without HIPEC: A Systematic Review and a Meta-Analysis

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program refers to a multimodal intervention to reduce the length of stay and postoperative complications; it has been effective in different kinds of major surgery including colorectal, gynaecologic and gastric cancer surgery. Its impact in terms of safety and efficacy in the treatment of peritoneal surface malignancies is still unclear. A systematic review and a meta-analysis were conducted to evaluate the effect of ERAS after cytoreductive surgery with or without HIPEC for peritoneal metastases. MEDLINE, PubMed, EMBASE, Google Scholar and Cochrane Database were searched from January 2010 and December 2021. Single and double-cohort studies about ERAS application in the treatment of peritoneal cancer were considered. Outcomes included the postoperative length of stay (LOS), postoperative morbidity and mortality rates and the early readmission rate. Twenty-four studies involving 5131 patients were considered, 7 about ERAS in cytoreductive surgery (CRS) + HIPEC and 17 about cytoreductive alone; the case histories of two Italian referral centers in the management of peritoneal cancer were included. ERAS adoption reduced the LOS (-3.17, 95% CrI -4.68 to -1.69 in CRS + HIPEC and -1.65, 95% CrI -2.32 to -1.06 in CRS alone in the meta-analysis including 6 and 17 studies respectively. Non negligible lower postoperative morbidity was also in the meta-analysis including the case histories of two Italian referral centers. Implementation of an ERAS protocol may reduce LOS, postoperative complications after CRS with or without HIPEC compared to conventional recovery.

Intra- and post-operative outcomes in benign gynaecologic surgeries before and after the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery protocols: A comparison

Objective

To compare intra- and post-operative outcomes in patients undergoing benign gynaecologic surgery before and after the implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols.

Introduction

ERAS is a multidisciplinary teamwork with the aim to reduce the body's reaction to surgical stress. The key components of ERAS include pre-operative counselling, avoiding prolonged fasting, standardised analgesic and anaesthetic regimes, early mobilisation and early discharge.

Materials and Methods

Women undergoing hysterectomy and myomectomy were included in the study. The pre-ERAS group had 100 cases and the ERAS group had 104. Demographic data of both the groups were compared. Duration of surgery, amount of blood loss, intra-abdominal drain, oral feed, catheter removal, ambulation, passage of flatus and length of stay were compared.

Results

The demographic profiles of both the groups were comparable. Time taken to intake of liquids (P < 0.001), solid food (P < 0.001), passage of flatus (P = 0.001), removal of Foley's catheter (P = 0.023), ambulation (P = 0.007), pain score (P = 0.001) and length of stay in hospital (P < 0.001) were statistically significantly shorter in the ERAS group when compared to the pre-ERAS group. A significant difference was seen in the use of intraperitoneal drains in the ERAS group (81% vs. 23.1%), and if used, drains were removed early in the ERAS group (66.66% vs. 28.39%) within 40 h. Both the groups had similar intra- and immediate post-operative complications.

Conclusion

ERAS helps in reducing length of stay with early feeding and ambulation, leading to early discharge without increase in intra- and post-operative complications in women undergoing benign gynaecological surgeries.

The impact of enhanced recovery after gynaecological surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery programs have become the gold standard of care in many surgical specialities.

OBJECTIVES

This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate how an ERAS program can impact outcomes across both benign and oncological gynaecological surgery to inform standard surgical practice.

SEARCH STRATEGY

An electronic search of the SCOPUS, Embase and PubMed Medline databases was performed for relevant studies assessing the use of ERAS in patients undergoing gynaecological surgery compared with those without ERAS.

SELECTION CRITERIA

The studies included were all trials using ERAS programs in gynaecological surgery with a clearly outlined protocol which included at least four items from the most recent guidelines and recorded one primary outcome.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Meta-analysis was performed on two primary endpoints; post-operative length of stay and readmission rate and one secondary endpoint; rates of ileus. Further subgroup analyses was performed to compare benign and oncological surgeries.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty studies (7885 patients) were included in the meta-analysis; 15 randomised controlled trials and 25 cohort studies. 21 studies (4333 patients) were included in meta-analyses of length of stay. Patients in the ERAS group (2351 patients) had a shortened length of stay by 1.22 days (95% CI: -1.59 - -0.86, P < 0.00001) compared to those in the control group (1982 patients). Evaluation of 27 studies (6051 patients) in meta-analysis of readmission rate demonstrated a 20% reduction in readmission rate (OR: 0.80, 95% CI: 0.65-0.97). Analysis of our secondary outcome, demonstrated a 47% reduction in rate of ileus compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

ERAS pathways significantly reduce length of stay without increasing readmission rates or rates of ileus across benign and oncological gynaecological surgery.

Use and misuse of opioid after gynecologic surgery

Postoperative opioid use following gynecologic surgery may be necessary for effective treatment of pain; however, it can result in significant side effects, adverse reactions, and negative health consequences, including prolonged problematic use. Surgeons and healthcare providers of patients recovering from gynecologic procedures should be aware of effective strategies that can decrease the need for opioid use, while providing high-quality pain management. These include adherence to Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Protocols, particularly the use of multimodal analgesia management. When prescribing opioids, providers should adhere to responsible prescribing practices to minimize the risk of inappropriate and/or long-term opioid use.

AUGS-IUGA Joint Clinical Consensus Statement on Enhanced Recovery After Urogynecologic Surgery: Developed by the Joint Writing Group of the International Urogynecological Association and the American Urogynecologic Society. Individual writing group members are noted in the Acknowledgements section

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) evidence-based protocols for perioperative care can lead to improvements in clinical outcomes and cost savings. This article aims to present consensus recommendations for the optimal perioperative management of patients undergoing urogynecological surgery.

METHODS

A review of meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials, large nonrandomized studies, and review articles was conducted via PubMed and other databases for ERAS and urogynecological surgery. ERAS protocol components were established, and then quality of the evidence was both graded and used to form consensus recommendations for each topic. These recommendations were developed and endorsed by the writing group, which is comprised of the American Urogynecologic Society and the International Urogynecological Association members.

RESULTS

All recommendations on ERAS protocol items are based on best available evidence. The level of evidence for each item is presented accordingly. The components of ERAS with a high level of evidence to support their use include fasting for 6 h and taking clear fluids up to 2 h preoperatively, euvolemia, normothermia, surgical site preparation, antibiotic and antithrombotic prophylaxis, strong antiemetics and dexamethasone to reduce postoperative nausea and vomiting, multimodal analgesia and restrictive use of opiates, use of chewing gum to reduce ileus, removal of catheter as soon as feasible after surgery and avoiding systematic use of drains/vaginal packs.

CONCLUSIONS

The evidence base and recommendations for a urogynecology-relevant ERAS perioperative care pathway are presented in this consensus review. There are several elements of ERAS with strong evidence of benefit in urogynecological surgery.

Pharmacokinetics and local tissue response to local instillation of vocacapsaicin, a novel capsaicin prodrug, in rat and rabbit osteotomy models

Vocacapsaicin is a novel prodrug of trans-capsaicin (trans-8-methyl-N-vanillyl-6-nonenamide) being developed as a nonopioid, long-lasting, site-specific treatment for postsurgical pain management. The objective of these studies was to examine the safety and tolerability of vocacapsaicin in an osteotomy model in two animal species and to evaluate bone healing parameters. Rats undergoing unilateral femoral osteotomy received a single perioperative administration (by instillation) of vocacapsaicin (vehicle, 0.15, 0.3, and 0.6 mg/kg). Rabbits undergoing unilateral ulnar osteotomy received a single perioperative administration (by infiltration and instillation) of vocacapsaicin (vehicle, 0.256 and 0.52 mg) alone or in combination with 0.5% ropivacaine. Clinical signs, body weights, food consumption, radiography, histopathologic examinations, ex vivo bone mineral density measurements (rats only), and biomechanical testing were evaluated at 4 and 8 weeks in rats and at 2 and 10 weeks in rabbits. Plasma samples were also collected in rabbits. There were no vocacapsaicin-related effects on mortality, clinical observations, body weight, or food consumption in either species. Systemic exposure to vocacapsaicin and its metabolites, including capsaicin, was transient. In rats, vocacapsaicin was devoid of deleterious effects on bone healing parameters, and there was a trend for enhanced bone healing in rats treated with the mid-dose. In rabbits, vocacapsaicin administered alone or in combination with ropivacaine did not adversely affect bone healing parameters. In conclusion, a single perioperative administration of vocacapsaicin in unilateral osteotomy models was well tolerated, locally and systemically, supporting its continued development as a novel, nonopioid treatment for postsurgical pain management.

Cardiac Enhanced Recovery Program Implementation and Its Effect on Opioid Administration in Adult Cardiac Surgery

In light of the worsening opioid epidemic and nationwide parenteral opioid shortage, our institution created an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol. Our objective was to evaluate our initial experience transitioning to ERAS in cardiac surgery. An institutional cardiac ERAS protocol was implemented in April 2018, consisting of opioid-sparing analgesia, liberalization of fasting and activity restrictions, and goal-directed standardization of perioperative care. Clinical outcomes, opioid administration, and pain scores of patients undergoing nonemergent cardiac surgery were reviewed from March 2017 to July 2018. Patients were propensity score matched into pre-ERAS and transition-to-ERAS (t-ERAS) cohorts and compared by univariate analysis. Of 467 patients, 236 patients were well-matched (118 per cohort). The transition to ERAS resulted in a 79% reduction in morphine equivalents through postoperative day 1 (359.3 mg pre-ERAS vs 75.4 mg ERAS, P < 0.0001). Despite less opioid utilization, t-ERAS patients reported lower pain scores (median 4.88 vs 4.14, P = 0.011). There was no difference in mortality (2% vs 0%, P = 0.498) or postoperative complications including initial hours ventilated (5.3 vs 5.2 hours, P = 0.380), prolonged ventilation (9.3% vs 6.8%, P = 0.473), renal failure (3.4% vs 2.5%, P = 0.701), and ICU length of stay (58.3 vs 70.4 hours, P = 0.272). The transition to cardiac ERAS resulted in significantly reduced opioid administration and improved patient pain scores while maintaining excellent outcomes. Well-supported, multidisciplinary teams of cardiac surgeons, anesthesiologists, and intensivists can dramatically reduce opioid use without sacrificing pain control or excellent clinical outcomes.

Pass or Fail? Postoperative Active Voiding Trials in an Enhanced Recovery Program

IMPORTANCE

Pelvic reconstructive surgery is often associated with transient postoperative voiding dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare postoperative active voiding trial (AVT) outcomes before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery program (ERP) for women undergoing pelvic reconstructive surgery. In addition, risk factors for postoperative urinary retention were identified.

STUDY DESIGN

We retrospectively identified patients undergoing inpatient vaginal or robotic pelvic reconstructive surgery before and after implementation of an ERP at our institution. Demographics, operative and postoperative details, and AVT outcomes were collected. Primary outcome was AVT failure. Variables associated with increased risk of AVT failure were identified using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Three hundred seventeen patients were included-75 pre-ERP and 242 ERP. There was no difference in AVT failures between pre-ERP and ERP groups (21.3% vs 21.9%, P = 0.92). The AVT failures were highest among those with abnormal preoperative postvoid residual volume (PVR ≥100 mL, 25.9% vs 12.2%, P = 0.01) and those who underwent an incontinence procedure (midurethral sling or Kelly plication, 30.4% vs 16.9%, P = 0.01). Compared with a reference procedure (total vaginal hysterectomy [TVH]), the following procedures were associated with statistically significant higher odds ratios (ORs) of AVT failure: TVH with incontinence procedure (OR, 15.0; confidence interval [CI], 4.58-48.9; P < 0.001), TVH with anterior repair (OR, 4.98; CI, 1.93-12.9; P = 0.001), and robotic sacrocolpopexy (OR, 3.6; CI, 1.18-11.2; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative AVT failure incidence did not differ pre- and post-ERP intervention. Abnormal preoperative PVR was associated with failed postoperative voiding trial. Concomitant incontinence procedures and/or anterior colporrhaphy were associated with increased incidence of voiding trial failure regardless of ERP cohort.

Risk Factors for Postoperative Narcotic Use in Benign, Minimally-Invasive Gynecologic Surgery

Background and Objectives:

To evaluate postoperative opioid use after benign minimally-invasive gynecologic surgery and assess the impact of a patient educational intervention regarding proper opioid use/disposal.

Methods:

Educational pamphlets were provided preoperatively. Patients underwent hysterectomy, myomectomy, or other laparoscopic procedures. Opioid prescriptions were standardized with 25 tablets oxycodone 5mg for hysterectomy/myomectomy, 10 tablets oxycodone 5mg for LSC (oral morphine equivalents were maintained for alternatives). Pill diaries were reviewed and patient surveys completed during postoperative visits.

Results:

Of 106 consented patients, 65 (61%) completed their pill diaries. Median opioid use was 35 OME for hysterectomy (∼5 oxycodone tablets; IQR 11.25-102.5), 30 OME for myomectomy (∼4 tablets; IQR 15-75), and 18.75 OME for laparoscopy (∼3 tablets; IQR 7.5-48.75). Median last post-operative day (d) of use was 3d for hysterectomy (IQR 2, 8), 4d for myomectomy (IQR 1, 7), and 2d for laparoscopy (IQR 0.5-3.5). One patient (myomectomy) required a refill of 5mg oxycodone. No difference was found between total opioid use and presence of pelvic pain, chronic pain disorders, or psychiatric co-morbidities. Overall satisfaction with pain control (>4 on a 5-point Likert scale) was 91% for hysterectomy, 100% for myomectomy, 83% for laparoscopy. Of the 33 patients who read the pamphlet, 32(97%) felt it increased their awareness.

Conclusion:

Most patients required <10 oxycodone 5mg tablets, regardless of procedure with excellent patient satisfaction. A patient education pamphlet is a simple method to increase knowledge regarding the opioid epidemic and facilitate proper medication disposal.

Implementation of the ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) protocol for hysterectomy in the Piedmont Region with an audit&feedback approach: Study protocol for a stepped wedge cluster randomized controlled trial. A study of the EASY-NET project

Introduction

ERAS (Enhanced Recovery After Surgery) is a perioperative program combining multiple evidence-based interventions designed to reduce the surgical stress response. Despite the publication of dedicated guidelines, ERAS application to gynecologic surgery outside clinical studies has been slow and fragmented. To promote the systematic adoption of the ERAS program in the entire regional hospital network in Piedmont an Audit-and-Feedback approach (A&F) has been adopted within a cluster randomized controlled trial, aiming to estimate the true impact of the protocol on a large, unselected population.

Methods

The study protocol provides for a multicenter stepped wedge cluster randomized trial, focused on women undergoing an hysterectomy, for comparison between standard perioperative management and perioperative management according to the ERAS protocol. The primary outcome is the length of hospital stay (LOS). Secondary outcomes are: post-operative complications, quality-of-recovery at 24-hours after surgery, 30-day readmissions, patients’ satisfaction, healthcare costs. The compliance to all the ERAS items is monitored with an A&F approach. All the gynecologic units of Piedmont hospitals are involved and all the patients hospitalized for elective hysterectomy in the period of the study are included. Centers, stratified by surgical volume and randomly assigned to four groups, are randomly ordered to activate the ERAS protocol in four periods, every three months. The planned calendar and the total duration of the study have been extended for six months due to the COVID-19 pandemic. The expected sample size of about 2400 patients has a high statistical power (99%) to detect a reduction of LOS of 1 day (effect size 0.5) and to estimate clinically meaningful changes in the other study endpoints. The study protocol has been approved by the Ethical Committee of all participating centers. Study results will be timely circulated within the hospital network and published in peer-reviewed journals.

Conclusion

Results are expected to demonstrate positive clinical outcomes of the ERAS protocol even when its implementation is directed towards an entire regional network of gynecologic units, and not only towards selected and highly motivated centers.

Trial registration

NCT04063072

Optimizing post-operative opiate prescribing following gynecologic surgery

•

Procedure based opiate prescribing often does not reflect patient opiate utilization resulting in overprescribing.

•

Using patient opiate utilization to determine the discharge opiate prescription lowers the quantity of opiate prescribed.

•

Patient-based opiate prescription recommendations can be successfully implemented into discharge order sets.

Background

Post-operative opiate prescribing has traditionally been stratified by procedure type with little regard for patient opiate utilization. We sought to evaluate peri-operative factors associated with patient opiate utilization post-operatively to develop, implement, and assess a discharge prescribing intervention.

Study design

This was a quality improvement study of opiate prescribing practices for patients undergoing gynecologic surgery on an enhanced recovery pathway (ERAS) pre- and post-discharge prescription intervention. In the pre-intervention cohort (12/2018 to 05/2019), peri-operative factors (demographic, procedure, and pain scores) associated with post-operative patient opiate usage and quantity of opiate prescribed were identified. A discharge planning intervention based solely on opiate usage was implemented. The pre- and post-intervention cohort (07/2020 to 09/2020) were compared to assess changes in post-operative opiate prescribing and refill requests.

Results

There were 220 patients in the pre-intervention cohort and 120 patients post-intervention. Post-operative opiate usage in the pre-intervention cohort was correlated only with pain score and age (p < 0.001, p = 0.04). Quantity of opiate prescribed was correlated only with procedure type and not reflective of patient opiate usage. Using this information, a discharge planning intervention for opiate prescription informed by opiate usage in the twenty-four hours prior to discharge was added to the discharge order set. Post-intervention, adherence to recommended prescription was 40.8%. Opiate prescriptions decreased from a mean 27.3 tablets to 14.8 tablets (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

A tailored, patient specific approach to post-operative opiate prescribing can significantly decrease the quantity of opiates prescribed.

Evaluation of the impact of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programme on the quality of recovery in patients undergoing a scheduled hysterectomy: a prospective single-centre before-after study protocol (RAACHYS study)

INTRODUCTION

The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) programmes following hysterectomies have been studied since 2010, and their positive effects on clinical or economic criteria are now well established. However, the benefits on health outcomes, especially rapid recovery after surgery from patients' perspective is lacking in literature, leading to develop scores supporting person-centred and value-based care such as patient-reported outcome measures. The aim of this study is to assess the impact of an ERAS programme on patients' well-being after undergoing hysterectomy.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is an observational, prospective single-centre before-after clinical trial. 148 patients are recruited and allocated into two groups, before and after ERAS programme implementation, respectively. The ERAS programme consists in optimising factors dealing with early rehabilitation, such as preoperative patient education, multimodal pain management, early postoperative fluid taken and mobilisation. A self-questionnaire quality of recovery-15 (QoR-15) on the preoperative day 1 (D-1), postoperative day 0 evening (D0) and the postoperative day 1 (D+1) is completed by patients. Patients scheduled to undergo hysterectomy, aged 18 years and above, whose physical status are classified as American Society of Anesthesiologists score 1-3 and who are able to return home after being discharged from hospital and contact their physician or the medical department if necessary are recruited for this study. The total duration of inclusion is 36 months. The primary outcome is the difference in QoR-15 scores measured on D+1 which will be compared between the 'before' and the 'after' group, using multiple linear regression model.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval was obtained from the Ethical Committee (Paris, France). Subjects are actually being recruited after giving their oral agreement or non-objection to participate in this clinical trial and following the oral and written information given by the anaesthesiologist practitioner.Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04268576 (Pre-result).

Historical and Forecasted Changes in Utilization of Same-Day Discharge Following Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To describe changes in length of stay and same-day discharges (SDD) following minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH) over the last decade and forecast anticipated utilization over the subsequent decade.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional analysis SETTING: American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database.

PATIENTS

All benign MIH excluding joint cases with concomitant non-gynecologic surgery in the 2011-2019 NSQIP datasets, identified by current procedural terminology code.

INTERVENTIONS

A descriptive analysis of changes in the estimated length of stay and utilization of SDD from 2011-2019. Multivariable negative binomial regression assessed for individual-level risk factors for prolonged hospital stay and autoregressive linear forecasting estimated the growth of SDD through 2029.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

239,220 MIH were identified. Over the 9-year period, SDD increased by 10.7% across all MIH. However, in 2019, SDD represented only 29.8% of total MIH discharges and utilization varied by surgical approach (laparoscopic hysterectomy: 35.4%; vaginal hysterectomy: 18.6%; laparoscopic-assisted vaginal hysterectomy: 19.6%) as well as a surgical indication of pelvic organ prolapse (32.7% without and 13.9% with prolapse). Multivariable models controlling for patient characteristics showed independent associations of route and indication for MIH and length of stay (adjusted relative rate 1.30, 95% CI 1.29,1.32 for vaginal hysterectomy and aRR 1.12, 95% CI 1.11, 1.14 for prolapse), however, these individual-level factors provided limited information explaining variation in the length of stay (model pseudo-R2 0.054). Forecasting models suggest that utilization of SDD will grow to 48.5% (95% CI 38.7-58.4) by the end of 2029.

CONCLUSION

While the estimated length of stay is decreasing among MIH over time, the utilization of SDD remained low in 2019, and was not explained by patient factors. If current trends hold, SDD utilization is not forecast to exceed 50% through 2029. Additional efforts focused on the provider and institution level are needed to encourage SDD as the standard of care for MIH.

Outcomes of open radical hysterectomy following implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery program

OBJECTIVE

Open surgery has become the standard approach for radical hysterectomy in early stage cervical cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) 2018 IA1 with lymphovascular space invasion-IIA1). Our primary objective was to compare the length of stay in patients undergoing open radical hysterectomy before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program.

METHODS

This was a single center, retrospective, before-and-after intervention study including patients who underwent open radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer from January 2009 to December 2020. Two groups were identified based on the time of ERAS implementation: pre-ERAS group included patients who were operated on between January 2009 and October 2014; post-ERAS group included patients who underwent surgery between November 2014 and December 2020.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients were included, of whom 29 patients were in the pre-ERAS group and 52 patients in the post-ERAS group. Both groups had similar clinical characteristics with no differences in terms of median age (42 years (interquartile range (IQR) 35-53) in pre-ERAS group vs 41 years (IQR 35-49) in post-ERAS group; p=0.47) and body mass index (26.1 kg/m² (IQR 24.6-29.7) in pre-ERAS group vs 27.1 kg/m² (IQR 23.5-33.5) in post-ERAS group; p=0.44). Patients in the post-ERAS group were discharged from the hospital earlier compared with those in the pre-ERAS group (median 3 days (IQR 2-3) vs 4 (IQR 3-4), p<0.01). The proportion of patients discharged within 48 hours was significantly higher in the post-ERAS group (47.3% vs 17.3%, p=0.013). There were no differences regarding either overall complications (44.8% pre-ERAS vs 38.5% post-ERAS; p=0.57) or readmission rates within 30 days (20.7% pre-ERAS group vs 17.3% ERAS group; p=0.40). Adherence to the ERAS pathway since its implementation in 2014 has remained stable with a median of 70% (IQR 65%-75%).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing open radical hysterectomy on an ERAS pathway have a shorter length of hospital stay without increasing overall complications or readmissions rates.

Updates in Enhanced Recovery Pathways for Gynecologic Surgery

Gynecologic surgery encompasses over a quarter of inpatient surgical procedures for US women, and current projections estimate an increase of the US female population by nearly 50% in 2050. Over the last decade, US hospitals have embraced enhanced recovery pathways in many specialties. They have increasingly been used in multiple institutions worldwide, becoming the standard of care for patient optimization. According to the last updated enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) guideline published in 2019, there are several new considerations behind each practice in ERAS protocols. This article discusses the most updated evidence regarding ERAS programs for gynecologic surgery.

Outcomes of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) in Gynecologic Oncology: A Review

Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a global surgical quality improvement program that started in colorectal surgery and has now expanded to numerous specialties, including gynecologic oncology. ERAS guidelines comprise multidisciplinary, evidence-based recommendations in the preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative period; these interventions broadly encompass patient education, anesthetic choice, multimodal pain control, avoidance of unnecessary drains, maintenance of nutrition, and prevention of emesis. Implementation of ERAS has been shown to be associated with improved clinical outcomes (length of hospital stay, complications, readmissions) and cost. Marx and colleagues first demonstrated the feasibility of ERAS in gynecologic oncology in 2003; since then, over 30 comparative studies and 4 guidelines have been published encompassing major gynecologic surgery, cytoreductive surgery, and vulvar/vaginal surgery. Implementation of ERAS in gynecologic oncology has been demonstrated to provide improvements in length of stay, complications, cost, opioid use, and patient satisfaction. Increased compliance with ERAS guidelines has been associated with greater improvement in outcomes.

Surgical Outcomes of Vaginal or Cervical Melanoma

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of radical resection compared with non-radical resection for vaginal or cervical melanoma.

Methods: We retrospectively analysed the clinical data of post-operative patients with primary lower genital tract melanoma hospitalised at Peking University Cancer Hospital between Jan 2014 and Dec 2020. The study endpoints were recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). Kaplan–Meier method-plotted survival curves and univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression models were used to identify the factors associated with RFS and OS, and to calculate hazard ratios (HRs) and associated 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

Results: A total of 80 patients were included. Thirty-one patients had received non-radical resection, and 49 patients had received radical resection. The median patient age was 55.5 (IQR 45.3–60.0) years. Sixty-two (77.5%) patients had vaginal melanoma. Sixty-four patients (80.0%) had received post-operative adjuvant therapy. The median follow-up time was 36.0 months (95% CI 10.1–62.1 months). Sixty-four patients developed recurrence, and 44 patients died. The median RFS (mRFS) was 6.0 months (95% CI 3.4–8.6 m), and the RFS for the radical resection group was longer than that for the non-radical resection group (9.5 vs. 5.3 m), with no significant difference (P > 0.05). The median OS (mOS) was 25.9 months (95% CI 14.4–37.4 m). The mOS was 24.6 months (95% CI 10.3–38.9 m) and 25.9 months (95% CI 10.9–40.9 m) in the non-radical resection group and the radical resection group, respectively. Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that surgical approach, infiltration depth of the tumour, lymph node metastasis, and post-operative adjuvant therapy were independent risk factors for RFS and that post-operative adjuvant therapy was an independent risk factor for OS.

Conclusion: By performing multivariate analysis, which corrected for potential confounding factors, we identified surgical procedures that were associated with RFS, and we found that RFS and OS in patients with vaginal melanoma and cervical melanoma benefitted from post-operative adjuvant therapy.

Long-term experience with a modified ERAS protocol for urogynaecology day procedures

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols were first reported for colorectal and gynaecologic procedures. The main benefits have been a shorter length of stay and reduced complications. A retrospective audit was conducted of all patients who underwent ambulatory pelvic organ prolapse surgery at the Townsville Day Surgery between January 2008 and June 2019. Following the publication of a former audit, a modified ERAS protocol was adopted at our practice. We omitted a carbohydrate-rich fluid intake prior to surgery in our local protocol. Data were analysed for the type of surgery, postoperative complications, and readmissions. All surgeries were performed by a single consultant urogynecologist. A total of 1381 women underwent 1937 surgeries. Transvaginal mesh (55.8%) was the commonest procedure, followed by a posterior repair (23.9%). Ninety-five patients (4.4%) had various complications, with a failed trial of the void as the commonest complication (87 patients). Only 8 patients (0.4%) required an unplanned admission after their procedures. Site-specific ERAS protocol is effective for providing standardised care in the surgical treatment of women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence in an outpatient setting. Complication rates are low and reduce further with experience and familiarity with the protocol.Impact statement:What is already known on this subject? Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols are being increasingly used in surgical practices. The main objective of the protocol has been on reducing postoperative morbidity and stay. The commonly practiced protocol includes a high protein intake diet and a glucose drink prior to surgery.What do the results of this study add? Our study utilises a modified ERAS protocol of omitting the high protein diet and the glucose drink for the minimally invasive uro-gynaecology procedures. The modified protocol is safe and associated with lower complications and readmission rates.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? The present study demonstrates the safety and effectiveness of our modified ERAS protocol that allows for patients to undergo surgical procedures and discharge on the same day, thus minimising the impact on the quality of life and vocations. A multi-center randomised controlled trial will conclusively demonstrate a cause-effect relationship between early discharge and patient preparation with our modification of the ERAS protocol. Further research should also consider patient satisfaction as an additional outcome measure.

Fast-Track in Minimally Invasive Gynecology: A Randomized Trial Comparing Costs and Clinical Outcomes

Study Objective: Evaluate the effects of a fast-track (FT) protocol on costs and post-operative recovery.

Methods: One hundred and seventy women undergoing total laparoscopic hysterectomy for a benign indication were randomized in a FT protocol or a usual care protocol. A FT protocol included the combination of minimally invasive surgery, analgesia optimization, early oral refeeding and rapid mobilization of patients was compared to a usual care protocol. Primary outcome was costs. Secondary outcomes were length of stay, post-operative morbidity and patient satisfaction.

Main Results: The mean total cost in the FT group was 13,070 ± 4,321 Euros (EUR) per patient, and that in the usual care group was 3.5% higher at 13,527 ± 3,925 EUR (p = 0.49). The FT group had lower inpatient surgical costs but higher total ambulatory costs during the first post-operative month. The mean hospital stay in the FT group was 52.7 ± 26.8 h, and that in the usual care group was 20% higher at 65.8 ± 33.7 h (p = 0.006). Morbidity during the first post-operative month was not significantly different between the two groups. On their day of discharge, the proportion of patients satisfied with pain management was similar in both groups [83% in FT and 78% in the usual care group (p = 0.57)]. Satisfaction with medical follow-up 1 month after surgery was also similar [91% in FT and 88% in the usual care group (p = 0.69)].

Conclusion: Implementation of a FT protocol in laparoscopic hysterectomy for benign indications has minimal non-significant effects on costs but significantly reduces hospital stay without increasing post-operative morbidity nor decreasing patient satisfaction.

Clinical Trial Registration:www.ClinicalTrials.gov, identifier: NCT04839263.

Effect of Enhanced Recovery Protocol on Opioid Use in Pelvic Organ Prolapse Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Our primary objective was to compare the total opioid use by patients undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery before and after implementation of an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP).

METHODS

Participants of this ambispective cohort study included a "pre-ERP" retrospective cohort and an "ERP" cohort of patients prospectively enrolled after the full implementation of the ERP in January 2019. Demographic and clinical data were collected from the electronic record. Descriptive statistics were used for demographic variables. Total opioid use was calculated for each participant using morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and compared between cohorts using the Student t test.

RESULTS

Study participants (n = 65) were similar between cohorts and had a mean (SD) age of 62.4 (9.7) years and body mass index of 28.9 (4.8), and had a median parity of 3 (interquartile range, 2-4). Comorbid conditions, assessed with the Charlson Comorbidity Index, were also similar, with a mean (SD) of 2 (2.9). Hysterectomy approach and apical procedures did not differ between groups. After ERP implementation, mean (SD) intraoperative and postoperative MMEs decreased significantly (59.4 [31.6] vs 36.9 [20.5], P < 0.01). Total MMEs prescribed at discharge also decreased (392.3 [88.4] vs 94.6 [61.3], P < 0.01). Total anesthesia time and surgical time were similar, whereas mean total admission time decreased (27.3 [10.8] vs 18 [8.6] hours, P < 0.01). Telephone calls within 30 days increased from mean 1 (1.0) to 2.2 (1.9) (P < 0.01), whereas clinic visits and 30-day readmissions did not differ.

CONCLUSIONS

Women undergoing apical pelvic organ prolapse surgery at an academic medical center received significantly fewer opioids after implementation of an ERP without a change in postoperative pain scores.

Long-term results of a standardized enhanced recovery protocol in unilateral, secondary autologous breast reconstructions using an abdominal free flap

BACKGROUND

In 2015, we published one of the first reports using an enhanced recovery protocol (ERP) in microsurgery¹, and in 2016, our final ERP setup in autologous breast reconstruction (ABR) using free abdominal flaps². We showed that by adhering to a few simple, easy to measure, functional discharge criteria, it was possible to safely discharge the patients by the third postoperative day (POD). However, one of the challenges of interpreting studies using ERP in ABR is the often heterogenous patient populations and the need to clearly distinguish between primary and secondary and unilateral and bilateral reconstructions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In the 5-year period from 2016-2020, the same surgical team, performed 147 unilateral, delayed breast reconstructions (135 DIEP, 9 MS-TRAM-2, and 3 SIEA flaps) according to our previous analgesic protocol and surgical strategy. Data were collected prospectively.

RESULTS

Three flaps were lost (2%) and 82% of the patients(n=128) were discharged to home by POD 2 (n=8%) or 3 (74%). The remaining 18% (n=26) were discharged by POD 4 (12.5%) or 5 (5.5%). Ten patients (7%) were reoperated, and 17 patients (12%) had minor complications within POD 30 (infection, seroma, etc.) that did not necessitate hospital admission.

CONCLUSION

Using our ERP, unproblematic discharge directly to home is possible on POD 3 in more than 80% of patients after ABR. ERP is no longer a research tool but considered standard of care in microsurgical breast reconstruction.

Enhanced Recovery Program for Outpatient Female Pelvic Reconstructive Surgery

OBJECTIVES

Enhanced recovery programs (ERPs) are evidence-based perioperative interventions designed to reduce narcotic use, decrease hospital length of stay, decrease medical costs, and improve patient satisfaction. Given the increase in outpatient procedures in female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, we sought to compare patient outcomes before and after implementation of an ERP for women undergoing outpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery.

METHODS

This was a prospective nonrandomized cohort quality improvement practice initiative. The ERP intervention group included consecutive patients (n = 66) undergoing elective outpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery from March 2016 to October 2016. Historical controls were consecutive patients (n = 124) who had undergone outpatient pelvic reconstructive surgery in the same period a year before ERP implementation. Our primary outcome was opioid use and postoperative pain scores. Secondary outcomes included procedure time, use of intravenous fluids, time to discharge, and total hospital cost.

RESULTS

There was an observed reduction in opioid use between the ERP patients and historic controls as measured by intraoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) and total MMEs, with no difference in postoperative pain scores or postoperative MME. In addition, reduction in length of procedure (P = 0.03), intraoperative intravenous fluids (P < 0.0001), and total hospital cost (P ≤ 0.01) was noted between the ERP patients and historic controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of an outpatient ERP for female pelvic reconstructive surgery was associated with decreased intraoperative and total MMEs, decreased length of procedure, decreased administration of intravenous fluids, and decreased total hospital cost without changing postoperative pain scores.

Systematic review of the effect of implementing enhanced recovery after surgery on selected attributes of surgical recovery in gynecology

This study aimed to systematically review the available literature on enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) following gynecologic procedures performed either as an open surgery or as a minimally invasive gynecological surgery (MIGS) in terms of outcomes. This review revealed the results of published literature and assessed the benefits and diverse outcomes of ERAS implementation in patients undergoing MIGS or other gynecologic surgeries. In this review, we sought to examine the efficacy of entire ERAS protocols, faithfully performed, to determine whether they were successful in improving individual attributes of surgical recovery. Electronic databases of PubMed, Cochrane, Web of Science, Scopus, MEDLINE, and ClinicalTrials.gov were systematically searched in January 2021 for relevant studies. Data were extracted from eligible studies including LOS, change in the quality-of-life and recovery over time, postoperative complications including nausea and vomiting, opioid or anesthesia use, hospital cost, patient satisfaction, postoperative pain, and readmission rate as outcomes. Many of the included studies reported a significant reduction in the LOS as well as in readmission rates, hospital cost, and occurrence of nausea and vomiting postoperatively. Moreover, a clinically significant increase was noted in patient satisfaction in studies that have used tools that measure patient satisfaction. No studies have reported a significant increase in the overall quality of recovery using appropriately validated tools. Following ERAS implementation, patients’ postoperative rehabilitation, including postoperative discomfort, readmission rates, and satisfaction, showed a clinically significant improvement.

Enhanced Recovery after Surgery: Perspective in Elder Women

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal convention first reported for colorectal and gynecologic procedures. The main benefits have been a shorter length of stay and reduced complications, leading to improved clinical outcomes and cost savings substantially. With increase in life expectancy, recent years has shown a significant rise in advanced age population, and similarly, a rise in age-related disorders requiring surgical management. Due to pathophysiological and metabolic changes in geriatric age group with increased incidence of medical comorbidities, there is higher risk of enhanced surgical stress response with undesirable postoperative morbidity, complications, prolonged immobility, and extended convalescence. The feasibility and effectiveness of ERAS protocols have been well researched and documented among all age groups, including the geriatric high-risk population.^[1] Adhering to ERAS protocols after colorectal surgery showed no significant difference in postoperative complications, hospital stay, or readmission rate among various age groups.^[2] A recent report mentions the safety and benefits following ERAS guidelines with reduced length of stay in elderly patients with short-level lumbar fusion surgery.^[3] The concept of prehabilitation has evolved as an integral part of ERAS to build up physiological reserve, especially in geriatric high-risk group, and to adapt better to surgical stress.^[4] High levels of compliance with ERAS interventions combined with prehabilitation can be achieved when a dedicated multidisciplinary team is involved in care of these high-risk patients.

Cohort study of impact on length of stay of individual enhanced recovery after surgery protocol components

Objective

The goal of this study was to explore which enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) bundle items were most associated with decreased length of stay after surgery, most likely associated with decreased length of stay after surgery.

Design

A cohort study.

Setting

Large tertiary academic medical centre.

Participants

The study included 1318 women undergoing hysterectomy as part of our ERAS pathway between 1 February 2018 and 30 January 2020 and a matched historical cohort of all hysterectomies performed at our institution between 3 October 2016 and 30 January 2018 (n=1063).

Intervention

The addition of ERAS to perioperative care.

This is a cohort study of all patients undergoing hysterectomy at an academic medical centre after ERAS implementation on 1 February 2018. Compliance and outcomes after ERAS roll out were monitored and managed by a centralised team. Descriptive statistics, multivariate regression, interrupted time series analysis were used as indicated.

Main outcome measures

Impact of ERAS process measure adherence on length of stay.

Results

After initiation of ERAS pathway, 1318 women underwent hysterectomy. There were more open surgeries after ERAS implementation, but cohorts were otherwise balanced. The impact of process measure adherence on length of stay varied based on surgical approach (minimally invasive vs open). For open surgery, compliance with intraoperative antiemetics (−30%, 95% CI −18% to 40%) and decreased postoperative fluid administration (−12%, 95% CI −1% to 21%) were significantly associated with reduced length of stay. For minimally invasive surgery, ambulation within 8 hours of surgery was associated with reduced length of stay (−53%, 95% CI −55% to 52%).

Conclusions

While adherence to overall ERAS protocols decreases length of stay, the specific components of the bundle most significantly impacting this outcome remain elusive. Our data identify early ambulation, use of antiemetics and decreasing postoperative fluid administration to be associated with decreased length of stay.

Evaluate the Effectiveness of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery Versus Conventional Approach in Benign Gynecological Surgeries: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) model versus conventional approach in benign gynecological surgeries (incorporating various routes of surgery).

Methods

This was a randomized controlled trial wherein patients undergoing gynecological surgery for benign indications from January 2019 to July 2020 were recruited and randomized into ERAS and conventional protocol groups using block randomization. The intended primary outcome was to compare the median length of hospital stay in both groups. “Fit for discharge” criteria were used to assess the length of stay as patients who belonged to hilly terrain with limited transportation facilities stayed for a longer duration.

Results

A total of 180 patients were recruited and 90 each was randomized into ERAS and conventional protocol groups. The difference in length of hospital stay between ERAS (36 hours, range 24-96 hours) and conventional group (72 hours, range: 24-144 hours) was significant (p<0.01). A statistically significant difference was noted in the time for recovery of bowel function and tolerance for diet in the ERAS group. No significant difference in complications and readmission (within 30 days) rate was seen between the two groups. Quality of life as assessed by the World Health Organization Quality of Life Brief Version (WHO-QOL BREF) on the day of discharge and day 30 was higher in the ERAS group in physical and psychological domains, while no difference was seen in environmental and social domains.

Conclusion

This study as an institutional experience strengthens the existing evidence regarding the efficacy of ERAS in reducing hospital stay and improving quality of life compared to the conventional perioperative management protocol.

Impact of Ketamine on Opioid Use and Persistent Pain After Cytoreductive Surgery with Hyperthermic Chemotherapy

Background

Persistent pain and opioid use can be devastating after cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraoperative chemotherapy (HIPEC).

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study to investigate the impact of ketamine use on postoperative complications and persistent and chronic pain after CRS-HIPEC.

Results

Ketamine reduced perioperative opioid use before and after implementation of recovery after surgery programs. Ketamine did not impact the formation of persistent and chronic pain formation and long-term opioid use. Postoperative complications and postoperative re-operations were independent predictors of persistent pain. Interestingly, the risk of having a complication was increased by 1% for every doubling in opioids used intraoperatively.

Conclusion

Ketamine use reduces perioperative opioid consumption in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC, but it is not associated with improvements in long-term opioid use and chronic pain.

Positive effects of the enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol in DIEP flap breast reconstruction

BACKGROUND

Enhanced recovery after surgery protocols are successfully implemented in different surgical specialties, but a specific protocol for autologous breast reconstruction is missing. The aim of this study was to determine whether an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol contributes to a reduced length of stay without an increase in postoperative complications for patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction.

MATERIALS EN METHODS

The effect of the ERAS protocol was examined using a single-center patient-control study comparing two groups of patients. Patients who underwent surgery between November 2017 and November 2018 using the ERAS protocol were compared with a historical control group (pre-ERAS) who underwent surgery between November 2016 and November 2017. The primary outcome measure was hospital length of stay. Secondary outcome measures were postoperative pain and postoperative complications.

RESULTS

152 patients were included (ERAS group, n = 73; control group, n = 79). Mean hospital length of stay was significantly shorter in the ERAS group than in the control group (5 vs. 6 days, p < 0.001). The average pain score was 1.73 in de the ERAS group compared to 2.17 in the control group (p = 0.032). There were no significant differences between the groups in postoperative complications. The ERAS group experienced less constipation (41 vs. 25 patients, p = 0.028).

CONCLUSION

An enhanced recovery after surgery protocol contributes an accelerated postoperative recovery of patients undergoing a DIEP flap breast reconstruction. In this study a significant decrease was found in hospital length of stay, patient-reported pain score and adverse health issues.

The impact of multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol on quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a randomized controlled trial

Background

Our objective was to evaluate the impact of multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol on quality of recovery after laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

Methods

One hundred forty female patients scheduled for laparoscopic gynecological surgery were enrolled in this prospective, randomized controlled trial. Participants were randomized to receive either multimodal analgesia (Study group) or conventional opioid-based analgesia (Control group). The multimodal analgesic protocol consists of pre-operative acetaminophen and gabapentin, intra-operative flurbiprofen and ropivacaine, and post-operative acetaminophen and celecoxib. Both groups received an on-demand mode patient-controlled analgesia pump containing morphine for rescue analgesia. The primary outcome was Quality of Recovery-40 score at postoperative day (POD) 2. Secondary outcomes included numeric pain scores (NRS), opioid consumption, clinical recovery, C-reactive protein, and adverse events.

Results

One hundred thirty-eight patients completed the study. The global QoR-40 scores at POD 2 were not significantly different between groups, although scores in the pain dimension were higher in Study group (32.1 ± 3.0 vs. 31.0 ± 3.2, P = 0.033). In the Study group, NRS pain scores, morphine consumption, and rescue analgesics in PACU (5.8% vs. 27.5%; P = 0.0006) were lower, time to ambulation [5.0 (3.3–7.0) h vs. 6.5 (5.0–14.8) h; P = 0.003] and time to bowel function recovery [14.5 (9.5–19.5) h vs.17 (13–23.5) h; P = 0.008] were shorter, C-reactive protein values at POD 2 was lower [4(3–6) ng/ml vs. 5 (3–10.5) ng/ml; P = 0.022] and patient satisfaction was higher (9.8 ± 0.5 vs. 8.8 ± 1.2, P = 0.000).

Conclusion

For minimally invasive laparoscopic gynecological surgery, multimodal analgesia based enhanced recovery protocol offered better pain relief, lower opioid use, earlier ambulation, faster bowel function recovery and higher patient satisfaction, while no improvement in QoR-40 score was found.

Trial registration

ChiCTR1900026194; Date registered: Sep 26,2019.

Optimizing Robotic Hysterectomy for the Patient Who Is Morbidly Obese with a Surgical Safety Pathway

STUDY OBJECTIVE

Obesity is a growing worldwide epidemic, and patients classified as obese undergoing gynecologic robotic surgery are at increased risk for surgical complications. This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility and outcomes of a surgical safety protocol known as the High BMI [Body Mass Index] Pathway (HBP) for patients with BMI ≥40 kg/m² undergoing planned robotic hysterectomy. Our primary outcome was the rate of all-cause perioperative complications in patients undergoing surgery with the use of the HBP.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

An academic teaching hospital.

PATIENTS

A total of 138 patients classified as morbidly obese (BMI ≥40 kg/m²) undergoing robotic hysterectomy.

INTERVENTIONS

The HBP was developed by a multidisciplinary team and was instituted on January 1, 2016, as a quality improvement project. Patients classified as morbidly obese undergoing robotic hysterectomy after this date were compared with consecutive historical controls.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Seventy-two patients underwent robotic hysterectomies on the HBP and were compared with 66 controls. There were no differences in age, BMI, blood loss, number of comorbidities, or cancer diagnosis. Since the implementation of the HBP, there has been a decrease in anesthesia time (-57.0 minutes; p = .001) and total operating room time (-47.0 min; p = .020), as well as lower estimated blood loss (median 150 mL [interquartile range 100-200] vs 200 mL [interquartile range 100-300]; p = .002) and reduction in overnight hospital admissions (33.3% vs 63.6%; p <.001). In the HBP group, there were fewer all-cause complications (19.4% vs 37.9%; p = .023) and infectious complications (8.3% vs 33.3%; p = .001), and there was no increase in the readmission rates (p = .400). In multivariable analysis, the HBP reduced all-cause complications (odds ratio 0.353; p = .010) after controlling for the covariate (total time in the operating room).

CONCLUSION

The HBP is a feasible method of optimizing the outcome for patients classified as morbidly obese undergoing major gynecologic surgery. Initiation of the HBP can lead to decreased anesthesia and operating times, all-cause complications, and overnight hospital admissions without increasing readmission rates.

Post-Cesarean Opioid Use after Implementation of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery Protocol

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate whether implementation of an enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocol is associated with lower maternal opioid use after cesarean delivery (CD).

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a pre- and postimplementation (PRE and POST, respectively) study of an ERAS protocol for cesarean deliveries. ERAS is a multimodal, multidisciplinary perioperative approach. The four pillars of our protocol include education, pain management, nutrition, and early ambulation. Patients were counseled by their outpatient providers and given an educational booklet. Pain management included gabapentin and acetaminophen immediately prior to spinal anesthesia. Postoperatively patients received scheduled acetaminophen and ibuprofen. Oxycodone was initiated as needed 24 hours after spinal analgesia. Preoperative diet consisted of clear carbohydrate drink consumed 2 hours prior to scheduled operative time with advancement as tolerated immediately postoperation. Women with a body mass index (BMI) <40 kg/m² and scheduled CD were eligible for ERAS. PRE patients were randomly selected from repeat cesarean deliveries (RCDs) at a single site from October 2017 to September 2018, BMI <40 kg/m², without trial of labor. The POST cohort included women who participated in ERAS from October 2018 to June 2019. PRE and POST demographic and clinical characteristics were compared. Primary outcome was total postoperative morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs). Secondary outcomes included length of stay (LOS) and maximum postoperative day 2 (POD2) pain score.

RESULTS

All women in PRE (n = 70) had RCD compared with 66.2% (49/74) in POST. Median total postoperative MMEs were 140.0 (interquartile range [IQR]: 87.5-182.5) in PRE compared with 0.0 (IQR: 0.0-72.5) in POST (p < 0.001). Median LOS in PRE was 4.02 days (IQR: 3.26-4.27) compared with 2.37 days (IQR: 2.21-3.26) in POST (p < 0.001). Mean maximum POD2 pain score was 5.28 (standard deviation [SD] = 1.86) in PRE compared with 4.67 (SD = 1.63) in POST (p = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

ERAS protocol was associated with decreased postoperative opioid use, shorter LOS, and decreased pain after CD.

KEY POINTS

· ERAS protocol was associated with decreased postoperative opioid use after CD.. · ERAS protocol was associated with shorter length of stay after CD.. · ERAS protocol was associated with decreased postoperative pain after CD..