A Nudge Toward Universal Aspirin for Preeclampsia Prevention

Preventing maternal morbidity and mortality from preeclampsia and eclampsia particularly in low- and middle-income countries

Preeclampsia (PE) is a complex heterogeneous disorder with overlapping clinical phenotypes that complicate diagnosis and management. Although several pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed, placental dysfunction due to inadequate remodelling of uterine spiral arteries leading to mal-perfusion and syncytiotrophoblast stress is recognized as the unifying characteristic of early-onset PE. Placental overgrowth and or premature senescence are probably the causes of late-onset PE. The frequency of PE has increased over the last few decades due to population-wide increases in risk factors viz. obesity, diabetes, multifetal pregnancies and pregnancies at an advanced maternal age. Whilst multimodal tools with components comprising risk factors, biomarkers and sonography are used for predicting PE, aspirin is most effective in preventing early-onset PE. The incidence and clinical consequences of PE and eclampsia are influenced by socioeconomic and cultural factors, therefore management strategies should involve multi-sector partnerships to mitigate the adverse outcomes.

Factors Associated with Guideline Concordant Clinician Counseling about Low-Dose Aspirin to Prevent Preeclampsia in Nulliparous Patients

OBJECTIVE

The primary aim of this study was to examine the United States Preventative Services Task Force (USPSTF) guidelines concordant low-dose aspirin (LDA) counseling and factors associated with counseling in nulliparous birthing individuals.

STUDY DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of nulliparous birthing individuals who delivered between January 1, 2019 and June 30, 2020 and received prenatal care at the Duke High Risk Obstetrical Clinics (HROB). All nulliparous patients over 18 years old who established or transferred care to HROB by 16 weeks, 6 days were included in the analysis. We excluded patients with more than two previous first-trimester pregnancy losses, multiple gestation, a known contraindication to LDA, initiation of LDA prior to their prenatal care, or documented medical history of coagulation disorder. Bivariate associations between demographic/medical characteristics and our primary outcome, receipt of counseling (yes/no), were assessed using two-sample t-tests for continuous variables and chi-square or Fisher's exact test for categorical variables. Factors significantly associated with the primary outcome (p < 0.05) were entered into the multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Among 391 birthing individuals included in the final analysis cohort, 51.7% of eligible patients received guideline consistent LDA counseling. Factors associated with increased odds of LDA counseling were advanced maternal age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 1.05, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01-1.09), Black race compared with White race (aOR:1.75, 95% CI: 1.03-2.98), chronic hypertension (aOR: 4.17, 95% CI: 1.82-9.55), and obesity (aOR: 5.02, 95% CI: 3.12-8.08).

CONCLUSION

Approximately half of all nulliparous birthing individuals had appropriately documented LDA counseling. The USPSTF guidelines on LDA for preeclampsia risk reduction are complex, which may lead to ineffective provider adherence. Efforts to simplify guidelines and improve LDA counseling are vital to ensuring this low-cost, evidence-based preeclampsia prevention is used in a consistent and equitable manner.

KEY POINTS

· A total of 51.7% of eligible patients received guideline consistent LDA counseling.. · Advanced maternal age , body mass index > 30, Black race, and chronic hypertension associated with increased odds of counseling.. · Among patients most likely to be counseled, high numbers did not receive LDA counseling..

Challenges in Conducting Clinical Trials for Preeclampsia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review recent data describing the challenges and innovations in therapeutic research focused on the prevention and treatment of preeclampsia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Pregnant individuals have traditionally been excluded from therapeutic research, resulting in a paucity of innovation in therapeutics for pregnancy-specific medical conditions, especially preeclampsia. With the increased awareness of maternal morbidity and mortality, there is significant interest among researchers to expand therapeutic research in pregnancy. Several medications, including aspirin, pravastatin, metformin, and esomeprazole, which are commonly used in non-pregnant populations, are now being investigated for preeclampsia prevention. However, given the historic precedent of exclusion, along with the regulatory, ethical, and feasibility concerns that accompany this population, the study of these and novel medications has been complicated by numerous challenges. While complex, and laden with challenges, there is great ongoing need for therapeutic research to address preeclampsia. Aspirin, pravastatin, metformin, and esomeprazole have all shown promise as potential therapeutic agents; however, their use remains to be optimized, and innovative therapeutics need to be developed.

Propensity score analysis of low-dose aspirin and bleeding complications in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

Low-dose aspirin (LDA) has been shown to reduce the risk of preterm pre-eclampsia and it has been suggested that it should be recommended for all pregnancies. However, some studies have reported an association between LDA and an increased risk of bleeding complications in pregnancy. Our aim was to evaluate the risk of placental abruption and postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) in patients for whom their healthcare provider had recommended prophylactic aspirin.

METHODS

This multicenter cohort study included 72 598 singleton births at 19 hospitals in the USA, between January 2019 and December 2021. Pregnancies complicated by placenta previa/accreta, birth occurring at less than 24 weeks' gestation, multiple pregnancy or those with data missing for aspirin recommendation were excluded. Propensity scores were calculated using 20 features spanning sociodemographic factors, medical history, year and hospital providing care. The association between LDA recommendation and placental abruption or PPH was estimated by inverse-probability treatment weighting using the propensity scores.

RESULTS

We included 71 627 pregnancies in the final analysis. Aspirin was recommended to 6677 (9.3%) and was more likely to be recommended for pregnant individuals who were 35 years or older (P < 0.001), had a body mass index of 30 kg/m2 or higher (P < 0.001), had prepregnancy hypertension (P < 0.001) and who had a Cesarean delivery (P < 0.001). Overall, 1.7% of the study cohort (1205 pregnancies) developed preterm pre-eclampsia: 1.3% in the no-aspirin and 5.8% in the aspirin group. After inverse-probability weighting with propensity scores, aspirin was associated with increased risk of placental abruption (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 1.44 (95% CI, 1.04-2.00)) and PPH (aOR, 1.21 (95% CI, 1.05-1.39)). The aOR translated to a number needed to harm with LDA of 79 (95% CI, 43-330) for PPH and 287 (95% CI, 127-3151) for placental abruption.

CONCLUSIONS

LDA recommendation in pregnancy was associated with increased risk for placental abruption and for PPH. Our results support the need for more research into aspirin use and bleeding complications in pregnancy before recommending it beyond the highest-risk pregnancies. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Aspirin in Pregnancy

Preeclampsia is associated with significant perinatal morbidity and mortality. Aspirin has been long purported and extensively studied for prevention of preeclampsia. For this reason, the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, and the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommend its use in pregnancy for preeclampsia prevention in those at high risk. Yet, much controversy exists regarding optimal use in pregnancy with guidelines across global organizations varying. In this narrative review, we summarize the published literature related to the safety, optimal dose, and timing and duration of use of aspirin, as well as other indications for which aspirin has been studied in pregnancy.

Effect of an electronic medical record nudge to improve quality improvement program tracking of neuraxial catheter replacements in obstetric patients

BACKGROUND

Monitoring complications associated with medical procedures requires reliable and accurate record keeping. Nudge reminders executed by way of electronic medical record (EMR) alerts influence clinician behaviour. We hypothesised that the introduction of an EMR nudge would improve documentation of replaced neuraxial blocks by obstetric anaesthesiologists at our institution.

METHODS

We developed an EMR nudge that would alert the physician to a replaced neuraxial block if two or more neuraxial procedure notes in a single patient encounter were detected. The nudge encouraged physicians to document neuraxial block replacements in our institution's quality improvement database. We assessed the rate of physician adherence to replaced neuraxial block charting prior to the introduction of the nudge (January 2019-September 2019) and after the implementation (October 2019-December 2020).

RESULTS

494 encounters during the chart review period, January 2019-December 2020, required a neuraxial block replacement, representing an actual neuraxial replacement rate of 6.3% prior to the introduction of the nudge in October 2019. This rate was largely unchanged (6.2%) after the introduction of the nudge (0.1% difference, 95% CI: -0.0119 to 0.0099). Prior to the introduction of the nudge, the proportion of correctly charted failed/replaced blocks in our quality improvement database was 80.0%, and after nudge introduction, the rate was 96.2% (p value <0.00001, OR=6.32, 95% CI: 3.15 to 12.66). A p-chart of the monthly adherence rate demonstrated sustained improvement over time.

CONCLUSIONS

EMR nudge technology significantly improved adherence with quality metric monitoring of neuraxial catheter replacement in obstetric patients. The results imply that data collection for quality metric databases of neuraxial block failures and replacements that rely on clinician memory without a nudge are likely under-reporting neuraxial block failures and replacements. This study supports widespread implementation of nudges in EMRs to improve quality metric reporting.

Reassessing Preterm Birth Prevention After the Withdrawal of 17-α Hydroxyprogesterone Caproate

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has recently withdrawn approval for 17-α hydroxyprogesterone caproate for prevention of recurrent preterm birth, and recent studies have called into question benefits of the pessary in the setting of a short cervix. Obstetric health care professionals are once again left with limited remaining options for preterm birth prevention. This narrative review summarizes the best current evidence on the use of vaginal progesterone, low-dose aspirin, and cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth; attempts to distill possible lessons learned from studies of progesterone and pessary, as well as their implementation into practice; and highlights areas where inroads into preterm birth prevention may be possible outside of the progesterone-aspirin-cerclage paradigm.

Aspirin and Pravastatin for Preeclampsia Prevention in High-Risk Pregnancy

Preeclampsia is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy affecting up to 8% of pregnancies. It is associated with significant neonatal and maternal morbidities and mortality. Although its pathogenesis is not completely understood, abnormal placentation resulting in imbalance in angiogenic factors, increased inflammation, and endothelial dysfunction are thought to be key pathways in the development of the disease. Administration of low-dose aspirin is recommended by professional societies for the prevention of preeclampsia in high-risk individuals. In this review, we summarize the evidence behind the use of low-dose aspirin and pravastatin in pregnant individuals at high risk of preeclampsia.

A novel approach to joint prediction of preeclampsia and delivery timing using semicompeting risks

BACKGROUND

Preeclampsia is a pregnancy complication that contributes substantially to perinatal morbidity and mortality worldwide. Existing approaches to modeling and prediction of preeclampsia typically focus either on predicting preeclampsia risk alone, or on the timing of delivery following a diagnosis of preeclampsia. As such, they are misaligned with typical healthcare interactions during which the 2 events are generally considered simultaneously.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the "semicompeting risks" framework as an innovative approach for jointly modeling the risk and timing of preeclampsia and the timing of delivery simultaneously. Through this approach, one can obtain, at any point during the pregnancy, clinically relevant summaries of an individual's predicted outcome trajectories in 4 risk categories: not developing preeclampsia and not having delivered, not developing preeclampsia but having delivered because of other causes, developing preeclampsia but not having delivered, and developing preeclampsia and having delivered.

STUDY DESIGN

To illustrate the semicompeting risks methodology, we presented an example analysis of a pregnancy cohort from the electronic health record of an urban, academic medical center in Boston, Massachusetts (n=9161 pregnancies). We fit an illness-death model with proportional-hazards regression specifications describing 3 hazards for timings of preeclampsia, delivery in the absence of preeclampsia, and delivery following preeclampsia diagnosis.

RESULTS

The results indicated nuanced relationships between a variety of risk factors and the timings of preeclampsia diagnosis and delivery, including maternal age, race/ethnicity, parity, body mass index, diabetes mellitus, chronic hypertension, cigarette use, and proteinuria at 20 weeks' gestation. Sample predictions for a diverse set of individuals highlighted differences in projected outcome trajectories with regard to preeclampsia risk and timing, and timing of delivery either before or after preeclampsia diagnosis.

CONCLUSION

The semicompeting risks framework enables characterization of the joint risk and timing of preeclampsia and delivery, providing enhanced, meaningful information regarding clinical decision-making throughout the pregnancy.

Preeclampsia: a report and recommendations of the workshop of the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Preeclampsia Foundation

Preeclampsia is a substantial cause of perinatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. The prevalence of this condition has increased over the past several decades. Additional opportunities are needed to foster interdisciplinary collaborations and improve patient care in the setting of preeclampsia. In recognition of the Preeclampsia Foundation's 20th anniversary and its work to advance preeclampsia research and clinical agendas, a 2-day virtual workshop on preeclampsia was cosponsored by the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine and the Preeclampsia Foundation and held January 25-26, 2021 in conjunction with the 41st annual pregnancy meeting. Leaders with expertise in preeclampsia research, obstetrical care, primary care medicine, cardiology, endocrinology, global health, and patient advocacy gathered to discuss preeclampsia prediction, prevention, management, and long-term impacts. The goals of the workshop were to review the following issues and create consensus concerning research and clinical recommendations: This report, developed collaboratively between the SMFM and the Preeclampsia Foundation, presents the key findings and consensus-based recommendations from the workshop participants.

Long-term outcomes following antenatal exposure to low-dose aspirin: study protocol for the 4-year follow-up of the APRIL randomised controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

The use of low-dose aspirin by pregnant women to prevent preterm pre-eclampsia is gradually increasing. The administration of aspirin during pregnancy improves perinatal outcome, which could translate into improved child outcome in the long term. However, antenatal exposure to aspirin could have adverse effects on child development that may manifest later in life. The aim of this follow-up study is to assess the long-term effects of antenatal exposure to low-dose aspirin compared with placebo on survival, (neuro)development, behaviour and general health at 4 years corrected age.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This is a follow-up study of the Dutch double-blind randomised controlled APRIL trial which assessed the effectiveness of treatment with aspirin (80 mg daily) compared with placebo for the prevention of preterm birth in women with a previous spontaneous preterm birth. Treatment was initiated before 16 weeks of gestation and continued until 36 weeks or birth. We aim to follow-up all 379 children born to women who participated in the APRIL trial and survived the neonatal period, at the corrected age of 4 years. The main outcomes are (neuro)development as assessed by the Ages and Stages Questionnaire, and behaviour as assessed by the Strength and Difficulties Questionnaire. Additional outcomes include mortality, growth and general health from birth up to 4 years, and a composite outcome including mortality, abnormal (neuro)development and problem behaviour. Analyses will be performed by intention-to-treat using a superiority design.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Institutional Review Board approval was obtained from the Medical Research Ethics Committee from Amsterdam Medical Center (no. W20 289#20.325). The results will be published in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

The APRIL trial (NTR5675, NL5553; EudraCT number 2015-003220-31) and the APRIL follow-up study (NL8950) are registered in the Dutch trial register. The study is funded by the Amsterdam Reproduction & Development research institute.

An imbalance-aware deep neural network for early prediction of preeclampsia

Preeclampsia (PE) is a hypertensive complication affecting 8-10% of US pregnancies annually. While there is no cure for PE, aspirin may reduce complications for those at high risk for PE. Furthermore, PE disproportionately affects racial minorities, with a higher burden of morbidity and mortality. Previous studies have shown early prediction of PE would allow for prevention. We approached the prediction of PE using a new method based on a cost-sensitive deep neural network (CSDNN) by considering the severe imbalance and sparse nature of the data, as well as racial disparities. We validated our model using large extant rich data sources that represent a diverse cohort of minority populations in the US. These include Texas Public Use Data Files (PUDF), Oklahoma PUDF, and the Magee Obstetric Medical and Infant (MOMI) databases. We identified the most influential clinical and demographic features (predictor variables) relevant to PE for both general populations and smaller racial groups. We also investigated the effectiveness of multiple network architectures using three hyperparameter optimization algorithms: Bayesian optimization, Hyperband, and random search. Our proposed models equipped with focal loss function yield superior and reliable prediction performance compared with the state-of-the-art techniques with an average area under the curve (AUC) of 66.3% and 63.5% for the Texas and Oklahoma PUDF respectively, while the CSDNN model with weighted cross-entropy loss function outperforms with an AUC of 76.5% for the MOMI data. Furthermore, our CSDNN model equipped with focal loss function leads to an AUC of 66.7% for Texas African American and 57.1% for Native American. The best results are obtained with 62.3% AUC with CSDNN with weighted cross-entropy loss function for Oklahoma African American, 58% AUC with DNN and balanced batch for Oklahoma Native American, and 72.4% AUC using either CSDNN with weighted cross-entropy loss function or CSDNN with focal loss with balanced batch method for MOMI African American dataset. Our results provide the first evidence of the predictive power of clinical databases for PE prediction among minority populations.

When to give aspirin to prevent preeclampsia: application of Bayesian decision theory

BACKGROUND

There is good evidence that first-trimester assessment of the risk for preterm preeclampsia and treatment of the high-risk group with aspirin reduces the incidence of preterm preeclampsia. Furthermore, there is evidence that aspirin is associated with an increased risk of maternal and neonatal hemorrhagic complications. Against this background, there are ongoing debates whether aspirin should be recommended for all women or to a subpopulation of women predicted to be at increased risk of developing preeclampsia. Moreover, if a strategy of the prediction and prevention of preterm preeclampsia is to be used, what method should be used for the prediction, and what risk cutoff should be used to decide on who to treat?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the policies of universal treatment, stratified treatment, and no treatment with aspirin.

STUDY DESIGN

Decisions about aspirin prophylaxis were considered from the perspective of the Bayesian decision theory. Using this approach, the treatment policies were evaluated for risks of preterm preeclampsia, effects of aspirin, and trade-offs between the harms and benefits of the treatment. Evidence on the risk of preterm preeclampsia was taken from the Screening programme for pre-eclampsia study, which was a first-trimester screening study for the prediction of preeclampsia. Evidence of the effect of aspirin was taken from the Aspirin for Evidence-Based Preeclampsia Prevention trial, which was a trial of aspirin vs placebo in the prevention of preterm preeclampsia. The trade-off between the benefits and harms of aspirin was specified by addressing the question, "What is the maximum number of women that should be treated to prevent 1 case of preterm preeclampsia?" The number can be considered as an exchange rate between the harms and benefits of using aspirin to prevent preterm PE. Given the uncertainty about the harms associated with aspirin, the treatment policies were compared across a wide range of exchange rates.

RESULTS

For exchange rates between 10 and 1000 women treated with aspirin to prevent 1 case of preterm preeclampsia, the net benefit achieved from the risk assessment and targeted treatment of women at high risk of preterm preeclampsia was higher than that from women with no treatment or women with universal treatment with aspirin.

CONCLUSION

Universal treatment with aspirin should be avoided. Risk-based screening should be used, and the cutoff for taking aspirin should be determined from the consideration of the trade-off between the benefits and harms and detection, false-positive, and screen-positive rates.

Use of a Smartphone App to Explore Potential Underuse of Prophylactic Aspirin for Preeclampsia

IMPORTANCE

Preeclampsia is a leading preventable cause of maternal morbidity and mortality. Initiation of low-dose aspirin (LDASA) treatment at or before 16 weeks' gestation may prevent preeclampsia onset for patients with specific risk factors.

OBJECTIVE

To assess potential underuse of LDASA and reasons for underuse using data from a prenatal care smartphone app.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this prospective cohort study, English-speaking pregnant patients aged 18 years or older from the UPMC health care system received an invitation to use the MyHealthyPregnancy app at their first prenatal appointment. Use of the app was voluntary. The study took place between September 23, 2019, and August 31, 2020, as part of a quality-improvement initiative.

EXPOSURES

The app offered educational information, monitoring tools, and routine screenings tailored to patient-entered gestational age and demographic and clinical characteristics. App-based questions included LDASA eligibility based on US Preventive Services Task Force criteria for preeclampsia risk and a monthly prompt about LDASA recommendations from the patient's health care practitioner.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The primary outcomes were the receipt of LDASA recommendations from a practitioner and adherence to any such recommendation, as self-reported on the app. Patients' medical records were examined to cross-reference their self-reports of an LDASA recommendation. Multivariable logistic regression was used to model patient-perceived recommendation as a function of factors associated with preeclampsia.

RESULTS

The patient cohort consisted of 2563 patient participants (2036 [79%] White; mean [SD] age, 30 [5.2] years) with 2567 pregnancies; 1882 pregnancies (73.3%) were among women with private or employer-based insurance, and 1246 (48.5%) were among nulliparous patients. At least 1 factor associated with high risk for preeclampsia was reported in 316 pregnancies (12.3%), and 2 or more factors associated with moderate risk were reported in 1051 (40.9%). Of the 1015 pregnancies for which patients answered voluntary questions about aspirin use, 124 (12.2%) met at least 1 criterion for highest risk of preeclampsia. In 57 (46.0%) of these pregnancies, the patient indicated that their practitioner recommended LDASA; after examination of the medical records, 90 pregnancies (72.6%) had evidence of an LDASA recommendation and 34 (27.4%) did not. Of the 90 pregnancies with a documented LDASA recommendation, 33 patients (36.7%) were unaware of it. Prior preeclampsia (28 weeks' gestation: odds ratio, 20.1; 95% CI, 11.0-36.9) and chronic hypertension (28 weeks' gestation: odds ratio, 17.4; 95% CI, 6.3-48.2) were the primary high-risk factors associated with recommendation of LDASA.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this cohort study, only 46.0% of prenatal care app users who met the criteria for highest preeclampsia risk reported receiving an LDASA recommendation from their practitioner, and medical records suggested that there may have been frequent miscommunication between patients and practitioners about LDASA use. Digital tools such as the MyHealthyPregnancy app might offer an opportunity to improve identification of patients at risk for preeclampsia and communication with these patients about aspirin use.

Improving Utilization of Aspirin for Prevention of Preeclampsia in a High-Risk Urban Cohort: A Prospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the utilization of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention before and after implementation of a screening tool during nuchal translucency (NT) ultrasound.

STUDY DESIGN

One-year prospective cohort study of patients at high risk for preeclampsia after the implementation of a screening tool (postscreen) administered to all patients at check in for NT (11-13 weeks) ultrasound. Prospective cohort was compared with one-year retrospective cohort (prescreen) the year prior (2017). All patients who presented for NT ultrasound in both cohorts were evaluated for the presence of one or more risk factor for preeclampsia with screening tool collected prospectively and chart review retrospectively. Provider recommendation for aspirin determined by documentation in prenatal record. Primary outcome was rate of provider recommendation for aspirin pre versus post screening tool, compared by Chi-square test and adjusted for potential confounders with multiple regression analysis.

RESULTS

Pre- (n = 156) and postscreen (n = 136) cohorts were similar except for race and multifetal gestation. Prescreen, rate of provider recommendation for aspirin was 74%. Of those with prior preeclampsia, 96% were recommended aspirin, compared with 64% of patients with other risk factors (p < 0.001). Postscreen, provider recommendation of aspirin improved to 95% (p < 0.001). Rate of preeclampsia/gestational hypertension were similar between cohorts; however, there was a reduced adjusted risk in overall preterm birth <37 weeks (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.50 [0.25-0.99]) and preterm birth <34 weeks (aOR = 0.33 [0.13-0.88]) postscreening tool implementation.

CONCLUSION

Prior to implementation of a simple screening questionnaire, approximately 25% of high risk patients did not receive the recommendation of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention. High-risk patients who lack a history of preeclampsia were less likely to be advised of aspirin prophylaxis. Use of a simple universal screening tool at time of NT ultrasound significantly improved utilization of aspirin for preeclampsia prevention and may improve patient outcomes.

KEY POINTS

· Despite recommendations, aspirin use for preeclampsia prevention is suboptimal.. · High-risk patients who lack a history preeclampsia were less likely to be advised of aspirin use.. · A simple universal screening tool can significantly improve aspirin utilization..

Prevalence and perinatal outcomes of non-communicable diseases in pregnancy in a regional hospital in Haiti: A prospective cohort study

Background

The prevalence of non-communicable diseases (NCDs) is rising in low and middle-income countries (LMIC). We aimed to report on the prevalence of NCDs in pregnancy and their associated perinatal outcomes in a regional hospital in Haiti.

Methods

We conducted the “Diabète et hYpertension Artéerielle et leurs issues MAternelles et Néonatales” (DYAMAN) prospective cohort study in a regional hospital in Haiti. Pregnant women presenting to care at 24-28 weeks were screened and treated for diabetes (DM) and hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) using setting-adapted protocols. Prevalence of NCDs and associated maternal-neonatal outcomes were described.

Results

715 women were included, of which 51 (7.1%) had DM, 90 (12.6%) had HDP, and 30 (4.2%) had both DM and HDP (DM/HDP). Of 422 (59%) women delivered in hospital, 58 (13.7%) had preeclampsia, including 5 (8.6%) with eclampsia. Preterm birth <32 weeks was more common in the HDP than the control, DM, and DM/HDP groups. More low birth weight babies (n = 20, 25.6%) were born to the HDP group than to the control (n = 20, 7.1%), DM (n = 1, 2.7%), and DM/HDP (n = 3, 12%) groups (P < 0.001). Macrosomia and hypoglycemia affected 5 (8%) neonates of women with DM. Perinatal mortality, affecting 36/1000 births, was mainly driven by maternal NCDs.

Conclusions

NCDs in pregnancy led to adverse maternal and perinatal outcomes. This study will help to prepare future refinements aimed at optimizing the management of NCDs in pregnancy in LMIC. Research is required to understand barriers to patient attendance at antenatal follow-up, treatment escalation for hyperglycemia, and in-hospital delivery.

Low-dose aspirin in pregnancy: who? when? how much? and why?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The use of low dose aspirin (LDA) has become routine in prenatal care for a variety of diagnoses, most importantly in women with a history of preeclampsia and associated poor pregnancy outcomes. Although LDA is currently indicated in patients considered to be at risk for development of preeclampsia, optimal dosing, timing of treatment initiation, and persons of benefit are under investigation. Several studies have also looked at LDA treatment and its effect on other maternal and fetal outcomes. This review summarizes the current guidelines for the use of LDA, incorporating the most recent research findings, and offers possible future implications of LDA treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over 10 years ago, the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the World Health Organization, and the United States Preventive Service Task Force began publishing guidelines focused on the use of LDA in pregnancy. Since the release of these guidelines, several large studies have re-evaluated the use of LDA with a focus on initiation of treatment and dosing. The combined results of these studies suggest a decreased rate of preeclampsia at aspirin doses >100 mg when treatment is initiated prior to 16 weeks of gestation.

SUMMARY

Overall, early initiation of LDA has been shown to decrease the development of preeclampsia in patients considered at increased risk. Current literature suggests increasing the recommended dose to >100 mg to optimize these risk reductions. Although LDA use seems promising for other outcomes like preterm delivery and intrauterine growth restriction, further studies to strengthen recommendations are warranted.

Association of a multiple-step action with cervical lymph node yield of oral cancer patients in an Asian country

Background

High quality lymph node (LN) yield could increase survival, however strategies to improve LN yield have been seldom reported. This study aimed to assess the multiple-step action to promote quality of neck dissection in oral cancer.

Methods

A total of 400 patients with oral cancer who underwent primary tumor resection and neck dissection, including elective and radical neck dissection, were recruited after propensity score matching by clinical T and N categories between January 2009 and September 2018. Patients were treated by two independent departments in our institute. A multiple-step action was initiated in October 2015 in one department, and another department was as a control group. The impact of multiple-step action on LN yield and regional recurrence were analyzed using multivariate analysis and difference-in-differences (DID) linear regression analysis.

Results

The mean patient age was 55.2 + 11.1 years, and 92% were male. A total of 180 (45%) patients had T3-4 disease, and 129 (32%) patients had N2-3 disease. The multivariate linear regression and DID analyses revealed that multiple-step action had a positive effect on LN yield. A net improvement of LN yield with a coefficient of 13.78 (p < 0.001) after launching multiple-step action (since October 2015) was observed. A borderline protective effect of multiple-step action for cN0 patients with a reduced regional recurrence rate of 11.6% (p = 0.072) through DID analysis was noted.

Conclusions

Multiple-step action was associated with increased LN yield and decreased regional recurrence in patients with oral cancer. The observed activity may promote surgeons to improve the quality of neck dissections, is feasible, and could be applied to a widespread patient population.

Early Pregnancy Blood Pressure Elevations and Risk for Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether women with early pregnancy elevated blood pressure (BP) or stage 1 hypertension exhibit increased risk of preeclampsia and maternal or neonatal morbidity.

METHODS

We conducted a clinical cohort study of 18,162 women who delivered a singleton neonate from 2015 to 2018 and attended at least two prenatal appointments before 20 weeks of gestation. Data were collected within the Magee Obstetric Maternal and Infant database, an aggregate of prenatal and delivery health records. Early pregnancy BP was defined as average BP before 20 weeks of gestation, and women were classified with normal, elevated BP, stage 1 or 2 hypertension according to current guidelines. The primary outcome was preeclampsia. Secondary outcomes were severe maternal morbidity, placental abruption, gestational diabetes, and composite neonatal morbidity.

RESULTS

Overall, 75.2% of the women were categorized with normal BP, 13.9% with elevated BP, 5.4% with stage 1 hypertension, and 5.5% with stage 2 hypertension. Risk of preeclampsia increased in a stepwise fashion with increasing BP category, adjusted for covariates (normal BP, 4.7%, referent; elevated BP, 7.3%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.29, 95% CI 1.07-1.56; stage 1, 12.3%, aOR 2.35, 95% CI 1.86-2.96), and stage 2, 30.2%, aOR 6.49, 95% CI 5.34-7.89). Results were similar among black and white women. Gestational diabetes was more prevalent among women with stage 1 (11.4%; aOR 1.50, 95% CI 1.18-1.91] and stage 2 hypertension (14.2%; aOR 1.65, 95% CI 1.30-2.10). Severe maternal morbidity and neonatal morbidity were increased only among women with stage 2 hypertension (aOR 2.99, 95% CI 2.26-3.99, and aOR 2.67, 95% CI 2.28-3.12, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Women with elevated BP, and stage 1 and 2 hypertension in early pregnancy are at increased risk for preeclampsia. These findings emphasize the importance of applying the 2017 BP guidelines to reproductive-aged women. Strategies to incorporate these guidelines into obstetric care may also be warranted.

Prevention of preeclampsia

Preeclampsia is an obstetric disorder that affects 3-8% of pregnant women and remains a leading cause of short- and long-term neonatal and maternal morbidity and mortality. Professional societies recommend the use of low dose aspirin to prevent preeclampsia in high-risk women. However, interest in prevention of this disease and better understanding of its pathophysiology have led to growing research on other agents. This review focuses on the main therapeutic agents evaluated or in use for preeclampsia prevention.

Novel Interventions for the Prevention of Preeclampsia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review the rationale and biological plausibility and discuss the current research on novel interventions for the prevention of preeclampsia.

RECENT FINDINGS

Preeclampsia affects up to 8% of pregnancies worldwide and remains a major cause of maternal and neonatal morbidity and mortality. Multiple medications have been investigated or repurposed as potential effective interventions for preeclampsia prevention. Aspirin is currently the only drug for which there is some evidence of benefit for preeclampsia prevention, and its use is recommended by professional societies for pregnancies at risk. Statins have shown promise for prevention of preeclampsia in animal models and human pilot studies, without any trend or concerns for safety signals or teratogenicity. The use of metformin has also gained popularity in experimental studies, but observations from randomized clinical trials were not consistent on its utility as a possible intervention for preeclampsia prevention. While initial studies evaluating esomeprazole were promising, randomized trials failed to show benefit. Contemporary research shows exciting new opportunities for prophylactic treatment for preeclampsia, to prevent this debilitating and life-threatening disease.