Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy: A Review of the Evidence

Multiple embryo manipulations in PGT-A cycles may result in inferior clinical outcomes

RESEARCH QUESTION

Do embryos that undergo a thaw, biopsy and re-vitrification (TBR) for pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) have different ploidy and transfer outcomes compared with fresh biopsied embryos?

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study of all embryos that underwent the following procedures: fresh biopsy for PGT-A (fresh biopsy); embryos that were warmed, biopsied for PGT-A and re-vitrified (single biopsy TBR); embryos with a no signal result after initial biopsy that were subsequently warmed, biopsied and re-vitrified (double biopsy TBR). The patients who underwent transfers of those embryos at a single academic institution between March 2013 and December 2021 were also studied.

RESULTS

About 30% of embryos planned for TBR underwent attrition. Euploidy rates were similar after biopsy: fresh biopsy (42.7%); single biopsy TBR (47.5%) (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.88 to 1.12); and double biopsy TBR 50.3% (adjusted RR: 0.99, 0.80 to 1.21). Ongoing pregnancy over 8 weeks was not statistically significant (double biopsy TBR: 6/19 [31.6%] versus fresh biopsy: 650/1062 [61.2%]) (adjusted RR 0.52, 95% CI 0.26 to 1.03). The miscarriage rate increased (double biopsy TBR: 4/19 [21.1%] versus fresh biopsy: 66/1062 [6.2%])(RR 3.39, 95% CI 1.38 to 8.31). Live birth rate was also lower per transfer for the double biopsy TBR group (double biopsy TBR [18.75%] versus fresh biopsy [53.75%]) (RR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.98), though not after adjustment (adjusted RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.09). These differences were not seen when single biopsy TBR embryos were transferred.

CONCLUSIONS

Embryos that undergo TBR have an equivalent euploidy rate to fresh biopsied embryos. Despite that, double biopsy TBR embryos may have impaired transfer outcomes.

Should non-invasive prenatal testing be recommended for patients who achieve pregnancy with PGT?

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether non-invasive prenatal testing is an alternative testing option to preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) in pregnant patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent PGT and invasive or non-invasive pregnancy testing after euploid blastocyst transfer at our IVF centre between January 2017 and December 2022.

RESULTS

In total, 321 patients were enrolled in this study, 138 (43.0%) received invasive pregnancy testing, and 183 (57.0%) patients underwent non-invasive testing. The mean age of the patients in Group 2 was higher than that of the patients in Group 1 (35.64 ± 4.74 vs. 31.04 ± 4.15 years, P < 0.001). The basal LH and AMH levels were higher in Group 1 than in Group 2 (4.30 ± 2.68 vs. 3.40 ± 1.88, P = 0.003; 5.55 ± 11.22 vs. 4.09 ± 3.55, P = 0.012), but the clinical outcomes were not significantly different. Furthermore, the clinical outcomes of patients undergoing invasive testing were similar to those of patients undergoing non-invasive testing with the same PGT indication.

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that non-invasive pregnancy testing is a suitable alternative option for detecting the foetal chromosomal status in a PGT cycle. However, the usefulness of non-invasive testing in PGT-M patients is still limited.

Role of genetic analysis of products of conception and PGT in managing early pregnancy loss

This article considers the addition of comprehensive 24-chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of products of conception (POC) to a standard evaluation for recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) to help direct treatment towards expectant management versus IVF with preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A). The review included retrospective data from 65,333 miscarriages, a prospective evaluation of 378 couples with RPL who had CMA testing of POC and the standard workup, and data from an additional 1020 couples who were evaluated for RPL but did not undergo CMA testing of POC. Aneuploidy in POC explained the pregnancy loss in 57.7% (218/378) of cases. In contrast, the full RPL evaluation recommended by the American Society for Reproductive Medicine identified a potential cause in only 42.9% (600/1398). Combining the data from the RPL evaluation and the results of genetic testing of POC provides a probable explanation for the loss in over 90% (347/378) of women. Couples with an unexplained loss after the standard evaluation with POC aneuploidy accounted for 41% of cases; PGT-A may be considered after expectant management. Conversely, PGT-A would have a limited role in those with a euploid loss and a possible explanation after the standard workup. Categorizing a pregnancy loss as an explained versus unexplained loss after the standard evaluation combined with the results of CMA testing of POC may help identify patients who would benefit from expectant management versus PGT-A.

Exploring the efficacy and beneficial population of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy start from the oocyte retrieval cycle: a real-world study

BACKGROUND

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is widely used as an embryo selection technique in in vitro fertilization (IVF), but its effectiveness and potential beneficiary populations are unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent their first oocyte retrieval cycles at CITIC-Xiangya between January 2016 and November 2019, and the associated fresh and thawed embryo transfer cycles up to November 30, 2020. PGT-A (PGT-A group) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)/IVF (non-PGT-A group) cycles were included. The numbers of oocytes and embryos obtained were unrestricted. In total, 60,580 patients were enrolled, and baseline data were matched between groups using 1:3 propensity score matching. Sensitivity analyses, including propensity score stratification and traditional multivariate logistic regression, were performed on the original unmatched cohort to check the robustness of the overall results. Analyses were stratified by age, body mass index, ovarian reserve/responsiveness, and potential indications to explore benefits in subgroups. The primary outcome was cumulative live birth rate (CLBR). The other outcomes included live birth rate (LBR), pregnancy loss rate, clinical pregnancy rate, pregnancy complications, low birth weight rate, and neonatal malformation rate.

RESULTS

In total, 4195 PGT-A users were matched with 10,140 non-PGT-A users. A significant reduction in CLBR was observed in women using PGT-A (27.5% vs. 31.1%; odds ratio (OR) = 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.78-0.91; P < 0.001). However, women using PGT-A had higher first-transfer pregnancy (63.9% vs. 46.9%; OR = 2.01, 95% CI 1.81-2.23; P < 0.001) and LBR (52.6% vs. 34.2%, OR = 2.13, 95% CI 1.92-2.36; P < 0.001) rates and lower rates of early miscarriage (12.8% vs. 20.2%; OR = 0.58, 95% CI 0.48-0.70; P < 0.001), preterm birth (8.6% vs 17.3%; P < 0.001), and low birth weight (4.9% vs. 19.3%; P < 0.001). Moreover, subgroup analyses revealed that women aged ≥ 38 years, diagnosed with recurrent pregnancy loss or intrauterine adhesions benefited from PGT-A, with a significant increase in first-transfer LBR without a decrease in CLBR.

CONCLUSION

PGT-A does not increase and decrease CLBR per oocyte retrieval cycle; nonetheless, it is effective in infertile populations with specific indications. PGT-A reduces complications associated with multiple gestations.

The number of prior pregnancy losses does not impact euploidy rates in young patients with idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss

PURPOSE

Our study aimed to determine the possible factors that might impact the probability of obtaining a euploid blastocyst following intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) procedures in idiopathic recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) patients.

METHODS

This single-center retrospective cohort analysis included 180 oocyte retrieval cycles of 166 women under 35 years old and those diagnosed with idiopathic RPL according to American Society of Reproductive Medicine (ASRM) guidelines. Trophectoderm biopsy and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were the techniques used. Patients were stratified by the number of previous losses (Group A: 2, Group B: 3, and Group C: > 3).

RESULTS

Baseline and embryological characteristics showed no statistically significant differences. The euploidy rate per analyzed blastocyst was comparable within the groups (63.3%, 58.2%, and 58.5%; p = 0.477). Logistic regression analyses confirmed that only the trophectoderm scores of A and B increased the probability of obtaining a euploid embryo [OR: 1.82, 95% CI (1.120-2.956), p: 0.016].

CONCLUSION

It is concluded that there was no correlation between the number of previous losses and the chance of finding at least one euploid embryo in ICSI cycles of women younger than 35 years.

Update on preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy and outcomes of embryos with mosaic results

Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) is used as a frequent add-on for in-vitro fertilization (IVF) to improve clinical outcomes. The purpose is to select a euploid embryo following chromosomal testing on embryo biopsies. The current practice includes comprehensive chromosome screening (CCS) technology applied on trophectoderm (TE) biopsies. Despite its widespread use, PGT-A remains a controversial topic mainly because all of the RCTs comprised only good prognosis patients with 2 or more blastocysts available; hence the results are not generalizable to all groups of patients. Furthermore, with the introduction of the highly-sensitive platforms into clinical practice (i.e. next-generation sequencing [NGS]), a result consistent with intermediate copy number surfaced and is termed "Mosaic," consistent with a mixture of euploid and aneuploid cells within the biopsy sample. The optimal disposition and management of embryos with mosaic results is still an open question, as many 'mosaics' generated healthy live births with no identifiable congenital anomalies. The present article provides a complete and comprehensive up-to-date review on PGT-A. It discusses in detail the findings of all the published RCTs on PGT-A with CCS, comments on the subject of "mosaicism" and its current management, and describes the latest technique of non-invasive PGT-A.

Genetics in reproductive endocrinology and infertility

Tremendous advances in genetics have transformed the field of reproductive endocrinology and infertility over the last few decades. One of the most prominent advances is preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), which allows for the screening of embryos obtained during in vitro fertilization before transfer. Moreover, PGT can be performed for aneuploidy screening, detection of monogenic disorders, or exclusion of structural rearrangements. Refinement of biopsy techniques, such as obtaining samples at the blastocyst rather than the cleavage stage, has helped optimize results from PGT, and technological advances, including next-generation sequencing, have made PGT more efficient and accurate. The continued evolution of the approach to PGT has the potential to further enhance the accuracy of results, expand the application to other conditions, and increase access by reducing cost and improving efficiency.

Impact of Multiple Vitrification-Warming Procedures and Insemination Methods on Pregnancy and Neonatal Outcomes in Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy

This study was to determine whether multiple vitrification-warming procedures and insemination method are associated with pregnancy and neonatal outcomes in preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). This was a retrospective, single-center, observational study of 112 patients who underwent standard PGT-A practice and 154 patients who desired PGT-A for their vitrified unbiopsied blastocysts. A total of 97 euploid blastocysts biopsied and vitrified-warmed once and 117 euploid blastocysts biopsied once but vitrified-warmed twice (83 in vitro fertilization [IVF]-derived and 34 intracytoplasmic sperm injection [ICSI]-derived euploid blastocysts) were transferred. The primary outcome was the blastocyst survival rate for transfer, live birth rate, and neonatal outcomes. The results showed that an additional vitrification-warming procedure on blastocysts resulted in a lower but not statistically different survival rate for transfer. Compared with euploid blastocysts vitrified-warmed once, those vitrified-warmed twice provided statistically similar live birth rate. Neonatal outcomes, including the sex ratio, gestational age, birthweight, preterm birth rate, and low birthweight rate, did not differ between single and double vitrification. No significant differences were observed in rates of blastocyst survival, blastocyst euploid and live birth, and neonatal outcomes resulting from either conventional IVF or ICSI. The neonatal follow-up of babies live-born so far did not report any congenital malformations. In conclusion, an additional vitrification-warming on blastocysts had no detectable adverse impact on clinical outcomes after frozen-thawed single euploid blastocyst transfer in PGT-A cases; and ICSI did not confer any benefit in improving clinical outcomes compared with conventional IVF in cases requiring PGT-A on already vitrified nonbiopsied blastocysts.

Cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy for women with subfertility in China: an economic evaluation using evidence from the CESE-PGS trial

BACKGROUND

There are a large number of infertile couples in China, but its treatment is notoriously expensive and not currently covered by insurance. The utility of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy as an adjunct to in vitro fertilization has been debated.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the cost-effectiveness of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) versus conventional technology in in vitro fertilization (IVF) from the perspective of the healthcare system in China.

METHODS

Following the exact steps in the IVF protocol, a decision tree model was developed, based on the data from the CESE-PGS trial and using cost scenarios for IVF in China. The scenarios were compared for costs per patient and cost-effectiveness. One-way sensitivity analysis and probabilistic sensitivity analysis were performed to confirm the robustness of the findings.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Costs per live birth, Costs per patient, Incremental cost-effectiveness for miscarriage prevention.

RESULTS

The average costs per live birth of PGT-A were estimated as ¥39230.71, which is about 16.8% higher than that of the conventional treatment. Threshold analysis revealed that PGT-A would need to increase the pregnancy rate of 26.24-98.24% or a cost reduction of ¥4649.29 to ¥1350.71 to achieve the same cost-effectiveness. The incremental costs per prevented miscarriage was approximately ¥45600.23. The incremental cost-effectiveness for miscarriage prevention showed that the willingness to pay would be ¥43422.60 for PGT-A to be cost-effective.

CONCLUSION

The present cost-effectiveness analysis demonstrates that embryo selection with PGT‑A is not suitable for routine applications from the perspective of healthcare providers in China, given the cumulative live birth rate and the high costs of PGT‑A.

Personalized versus standard frozen-thawed embryo transfer in IVF/ICSI cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate whether personalized embryo transfer (pET) protocol guided by an endometrial receptivity array (ERA) can improve clinical outcomes of assisted reproduction.

METHODS

We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane library for studies in which analytical comparisons of outcomes of pET and standard embryo transfer (sET) groups were undertaken. The references to the included studies were also manually searched. The primary outcome was clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), and the secondary outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG) positivity, biochemical pregnancy rate (BPR), miscarriage rate (MR), implantation rate (IR), and ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR).

RESULTS

Ten studies were included in the meta-analysis, including one randomized controlled trial (RCT) and nine cohort studies. We observed no significant difference in the primary outcome of CPR between the pET and sET groups in unselected patients (RR = 1.07; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87-1.30; P = 0.53; I2 = 89%). In terms of secondary outcomes, we likewise noted no significant differences between the groups. Further subgroup analyses indicated that the pET protocol not only significantly reduced the MR for poor-prognosis patients, but it also reduced the CPR in donor cycles, elevated the BPR for good-prognosis patients, non-preimplantation genetic testing (PGT), and programmed cycles, and decreased the proportion of women showing HCG positivity in non-PGT cycles.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis revealed that ERA appears to possess limited guidance in embryo transfer. More high-quality RCTs are therefore needed to investigate the clinical validity and feasibility of ERA in the future.

Utility of polygenic embryo screening for disease depends on the selection strategy

Polygenic risk scores (PRSs) have been offered since 2019 to screen in vitro fertilization embryos for genetic liability to adult diseases, despite a lack of comprehensive modeling of expected outcomes. Here we predict, based on the liability threshold model, the expected reduction in complex disease risk following polygenic embryo screening for a single disease. A strong determinant of the potential utility of such screening is the selection strategy, a factor that has not been previously studied. When only embryos with a very high PRS are excluded, the achieved risk reduction is minimal. In contrast, selecting the embryo with the lowest PRS can lead to substantial relative risk reductions, given a sufficient number of viable embryos. We systematically examine the impact of several factors on the utility of screening, including: variance explained by the PRS, number of embryos, disease prevalence, parental PRSs, and parental disease status. We consider both relative and absolute risk reductions, as well as population-averaged and per-couple risk reductions, and also examine the risk of pleiotropic effects. Finally, we confirm our theoretical predictions by simulating 'virtual' couples and offspring based on real genomes from schizophrenia and Crohn's disease case-control studies. We discuss the assumptions and limitations of our model, as well as the potential emerging ethical concerns.

Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Monogenic Conditions: Is Cell-Free DNA Testing the Next Step?

Genetic assessment of an embryo via preimplantation genetic testing (PGT) represents an important reproductive option for couples wanting to try and improve success rates from in vitro fertilisation (IVF) cycles, as well as reduce their risk of having a child born with a genetic condition. Currently, biopsy of the developing embryo prior to transfer allows genetic assessment of an embryo for either chromosome copy number (aneuploidy [PGT-A] or segmental rearrangement [PGT-SR]) or to avoid the transmission of a single gene condition (monogenic conditions [PGT-M]). However, this technology is invasive and commands considerable resources. Non-invasive PGT (niPGT) offers a potential alternate mode of embryonic analysis. Whilst the utility of niPGT-A has been recently explored, there has been limited consideration of niPGT-M as an option for couples at risk of passing on a single gene or chromosomal condition. This review examines the historical and current clinical context of preimplantation embryonic analysis for monogenic conditions, in addition to important considerations surrounding the origin and analysis of cell-free deoxyribose nucleic acid (cfDNA), whether it is sourced via blastocentesis or spent embryonic culture medium (SCM). Future capabilities of this testing modality will almost certainly be enhanced by integration of whole genome sequencing into everyday practice. In addition, the increased utilisation of reproductive carrier screening as part of standard reproductive healthcare will likely result in the identification of a larger high-risk population. As a result, stratification of limited and highly specialised reproductive genetic resources will be required. Prospective parents should continue to be made aware of the limitations of this technology, with prenatal confirmatory testing remaining an essential part of antenatal care in these patients. However, niPGT-M poses an important alternate testing modality for high-risk couples, particularly in the setting of embryos that cannot be biopsied for traditional PGT-M and as demand for this treatment continues to grow.

Genetic testing of products of conception in recurrent pregnancy loss evaluation

Genetic testing of products of conception (POC) has been proposed as a tool to be used in the evaluation of patients with recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL). Following a complete RPL evaluation, POC results may reveal an aneuploidy and provide an explanation for the miscarriage in more than 55% of cases. When the cytogenetic result of the pregnancy loss reveals a euploid pregnancy, management should be directed towards the identification of treatable abnormalities. Furthermore, the results of POC testing might better define a subgroup of patients with unexplained RPL who may benefit from expectant management versus preimplantation genetics (aneuploid unexplained RPL) or investigational therapy (euploid unexplained RPL).