More questions about the accuracy of colposcopy: what does this mean for cervical cancer prevention?

Diagnostic colposcopic accuracy by the gynocular and a stationary colposcope

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of sensitivity and specificity of cervical lesions by the low-cost, portable Gynocular colposcope and a stationary colposcope, in women referred for colposcopy with abnormal cervical cytology.

METHODS

A randomized cross-over clinical trial for evaluating the diagnostic accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by the Gynocular and a stationary colposcope. The Swede score systematic colposcopy system was used for evaluation of colposcopic abnormalities. Directed punch biopsy and excisional cone biopsy were used as the "gold-standard" by histologically confirmed high grade cervical lesions CIN2+ (CIN2, CIN3, CIN3+). In total, 123 women referred for colposcopy due to abnormal cervical cytology were recruited at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. The percentage agreement and the kappa statistic were calculated for Swede score by the Gynocular and a stationary colposcope. Swede scores were compared with the results from directed punch biopsy and excisional cone biopsy.

RESULTS

The Gynocular and the stationary colposcope had a high agreement of Swede scores with a Kappa statistic of 0.947, p < .0001. Punch biopsy diagnosed CIN2+ (CIN2, CIN3, and invasive cancer) in 44 (35.7 percent) women while cytology detected CIN2+ in 34 (27.6 percent) women. There were no significant differences of the sensitivity and specificity for different Swede scores by the Gynocular or a stationary colposcope in detecting CIN 2+.

CONCLUSIONS

There were no significant differences in sensitivity or specificity in detecting cervical lesions by the Gynocular or stationary colposcope. The Gynocular is as accurate in diagnosing cervical lesions as a stationary colposcope.

Evaluation of the accuracy in detecting cervical lesions by nurses versus doctors using a stationary colposcope and Gynocular in a low-resource setting

OBJECTIVES

Evaluation of the performance of VIA (visual inspection with acetic acid) trained nurses to learn colposcopy and the Swede score method to detect cervical lesions by using stationary colposcope or a portable, hand-held colposcope; the Gynocular, as compared to doctors.

DESIGN

A crossover randomised clinical trial.

SETTING

The Colposcopy Clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University (BSMMU), Dhaka, Bangladesh.

PARTICIPANTS

932 women attending the clinic as either screening naïve for VIA screening (404) or women referred as VIA positive (528) from other VIA screening centres in the Dhaka region.

INTERVENTION

VIA trained nurses were trained on-site in colposcopy and in the Swede score systematic colposcopy method. The Swede score grade cervical acetowhiteness, margins plus surface. vessel pattern, lesion size and iodine staining. The women were randomised to start the examination by either a stationary colposcope or the Gynocular. Swede scores were first obtained by a nurse and the same patient was equally evaluated by a doctor.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Agreement between nurses and doctors in Swede scores was evaluated using the weighted κ statistic for the Gynocular and standard colposcope. The ability to predict CIN 2+ (CIN 2, CIN 3 and invasive cervical cancer) using Swede scores was evaluated using receiver-operating characteristic curves.

RESULTS

The Swede scores obtained by nurses and doctors using the Gynocular and stationary colposcope showed high agreement with a κ statistic of 0.858 and 0.859, respectively, and no difference in detecting cervical lesions in biopsy. Biopsy detected CIN 2+ in 39 (4.2%) women.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that VIA nurses can perform colposcopy. There was no significant differences compared to doctors in detecting cervical lesions by stationary colposcope or the Gynocular using the Swede score system. Swede scores obtained by nurses using the Gynocular could offer an accurate cervical diagnostic approach in low resource settings.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN53264564.

Evaluation of stationary colposcope and the Gynocular, by the Swede score systematic colposcopic system in VIA positive women: a crossover randomized trial

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate cervical lesions by the Swede coloscopy system, histologic finding, liquid-based cytology, and human papillomavirus (HPV) in women who resulted positive for visual inspection of the cervix with acetic acid (VIA) by using a pocket-sized battery-driven colposcope, the Gynocular (Gynius AB, Sweden).

Methods

This study was a crossover, randomized clinical trial at the colposcopy clinic of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University in Dhaka, Bangladesh, with 540 VIA-positive women. Swede scores were obtained by the Gynocular and stationary colposcope, as well as samples for liquid-based cytology, HPV, and cervical biopsies. The Swede scores were compared against the histologic diagnosis and used as criterion standard. The percentage agreement and the κ statistic for the Gynocular and standard colposcope were also calculated.

Results

The Gynocular and stationary colposcope showed high agreement in Swede scores with a κ statistic of 0.998, P value of less than 0.0001, and no difference in detecting cervical lesions in biopsy. Biopsy detected cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2+ (CIN2, CIN3, and invasive cancer) in 38 (7%) of the women, whereas liquid-based cytology detected CIN2+ in 13 (2.5%) of the women. Forty-four (8.6%) women who were tested resulted positive for HPV; 20 (3.9%) women had HPV-16, 2 (0.4%) had HPV-18, and 22 (4.3%) had other high-risk HPV.

Conclusions

Our study showed that few VIA-positive women had CIN2+ lesions or HPV infection. Colposcopy by Swede score identified significantly more CIN2+ lesions than liquid-based cytology and could offer a more accurate screening and selection for immediate treatment of cervical lesions in low-resource settings.

Performance of a colposcopic examination, a loop electrosurgical procedure, and cryotherapy of the cervix

Colposcopy is the accepted diagnostic test for evaluation of an abnormal Pap test to determine the location and extent of cervical intraepithelial lesions (CIN). Loop electrocautery excision procedure (LEEP) is the preferred procedure for advanced diagnosis and treatment of CIN following colposcopy. Although LEEP is the preferred treatment of CIN, cryotherapy is an option for treatment in some settings due to it's ease of performance, minimal complications, and cost-effectiveness. This article focuses on the proper technique and use of these procedures to evaluate and treat cervical abnormalities.

Cervical excisional treatment of young women: a population-based study

OBJECTIVE

Assessment of cytology and biopsy results preceding cervical excisional treatment and their association with excisional histology, to evaluate compliance with treatment recommendations and the potential effect of revisions in cervical histology terminology and usage.

METHOD

Data from a unique statewide population-based screening registry was used to describe the use and histologic outcomes of cervical excisional procedures in the year following an abnormal cervical screening cytology.

RESULTS

From 2007 to 2011, LEEP rates decreased 87%, 45%, and 16% for women aged 15-20, 21-24, and 25-29 years, respectively. Reductions were attributable to an overall decline in cervical screening and colposcopy, and a decrease in LEEP following a diagnosis of less than cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 (0.7) for women aged 30-39 years. Irrespective of age, CIN2 was the most common histologic antecedent of excisional treatment (42%), with most (80%) preceded by

CONCLUSION

Cervical excisions are an unavoidable consequence of cervical screening. Adherence to treatment guidelines stipulating conservative follow-up of young women with biopsies ≤CIN2 could significantly decrease the number of excisional procedures and associated harms. This opportunity will be lost if cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) and some or all of CIN2 are merged into a single histologic category, as has been recently recommended in the United States.

Collapse

Key Words

• Adherence to cervical treatment guidelines
• Cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grades 2 and 3 (CIN2 and CIN3)
• Cervical screening
• Colposcopy
• Effectiveness and harms of cervical screening
• Loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP)

Collapse

MESH Headings

• Adolescent
• Adult
• Biopsy/methods
• Biopsy/statistics & numerical data
• Conization/methods
• Conization/statistics & numerical data
• Electrosurgery/methods
• Electrosurgery/statistics & numerical data
• Female
• Humans
• New Mexico/epidemiology
• Registries
• Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/classification
• Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/epidemiology
• Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/pathology
• Uterine Cervical Neoplasms/surgery
• Young Adult
• Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/classification
• Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/epidemiology
• Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/pathology
• Uterine Cervical Dysplasia/surgery

Collapse

Grants

• U19 AI084081 NIAID NIH HHS
• U54 CA164336 NCI NIH HHS
• U19AI084081 NIAID NIH HHS
• U54CA164336 NCI NIH HHS

Collapse

Affiliation(s)

Walter Kinney Department of Women's Health and Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Permanente Medical Group, Oakland, CA, USA
William C Hunt Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Helen Dinkelspiel Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
Michael Robertson Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA
Jack Cuzick Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
Cosette M Wheeler Department of Pathology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of New Mexico Health Sciences Center, Albuquerque, NM, USA.

Collapse

Follow-up findings in young females with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion papanicolaou test results

CONTEXT

New guidelines discourage cervical screening and procedures in young females, given available human papillomavirus vaccines, concerns regarding procedure-associated harms, and the rarity of cervical cancers.

OBJECTIVE

To analyze histopathologic follow-up data on a large number of young females with high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) Papanicolaou (Pap) test results.

DESIGN

Hospital records were searched for HSIL Pap test results in females 20 years or younger between January 2002 and December 2007. Histopathologic and Pap test follow-up, age group variations, and impact of Pap test transformation zone/endocervical sampling were analyzed.

RESULTS

Four hundred seventy-four females aged 20 years or younger had HSIL Pap test results during the study period. Three hundred thirty-five young females with at least one cervical biopsy were included. The average age was 18.6 years (range, 13-20 years). The average follow-up period was 24 months (range, 0.1-75 months), with a median of 22 months. Histopathologic detection rates were 44.2% for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 2/3 and 47.8% for CIN 1. The average period between the HSIL Pap test result and an initial diagnosis of CIN 2/3 was 5 months (range, 0.1-62 months), with a median of 2 months. Neither invasive carcinoma nor adenocarcinoma in situ was identified. Presence or absence of a transformation zone/endocervical sample did not significantly impact CIN 2/3 risk (44.5% versus 38.9%, P = .64).

CONCLUSIONS

Histopathologic CIN 2/3 was documented in 148 of 335 (44%) of biopsied young females with HSIL Pap results, likely reflecting both the reported high likelihood of HSIL regression in younger females and the challenge of colposcopic sampling of relatively short-lived smaller CIN 2/3 lesions. Although no cases of invasive carcinoma were identified in this study, updated guidelines pose new risks for maturing females with undetected cervical precancer.

Human papillomavirus-based cervical cancer prevention: long-term results of a randomized screening trial

BACKGROUND

Screen-and-treat approaches to cervical cancer prevention are an attractive option for low-resource settings, but data on their long-term efficacy are lacking. We evaluated the efficacy of two screen-and-treat approaches through 36 months of follow-up in a randomized trial.

METHODS

A total of 6637 unscreened South African women aged 35-65 years who were tested for the presence of high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA in cervical samples underwent visual inspection of the cervix using acetic acid staining and HIV serotesting. Of these, 6555 were randomly assigned to three study arms: 1) HPV-and-treat, in which all women with a positive HPV DNA test result underwent cryotherapy; 2) visual inspection-and-treat, in which all women with a positive visual inspection test result underwent cryotherapy; or 3) control, in which further evaluation or treatment was delayed for 6 months. All women underwent colposcopy with biopsy at 6 months. All women who were HPV DNA- or visual inspection-positive at enrollment, and a subset of all other women had extended follow-up to 36 months (n = 3639) with yearly colposcopy. The endpoint-cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+)-was analyzed using actuarial life-table methods. All statistical tests were two-sided.

RESULTS

After 36 months, there was a sustained statistically significant decrease in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the HPV-and-treat arm compared with the control arm (1.5% vs 5.6%, difference = 4.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.8% to 5.3%, P < .001). The difference in the cumulative detection of CIN2+ in the visual inspection-and-treat arm compared with the control was less (3.8% vs 5.6%, difference = 1.8%, 95% CI = 0.4% to 3.2%, P = .002). Incident cases of CIN2+ (identified more than 12 months after enrollment) were less common in the HPV-and-treat arm (0.3%, 95% CI = 0.05% to 1.02%) than in the control (1.0%, 95% CI = 0.5% to 1.7%) or visual inspection-and-treat (1.3%, 95% CI = 0.8% to 2.1%) arms.

CONCLUSIONS

In this trial, a screen-and-treat approach using HPV DNA testing identified and treated prevalent cases of CIN2+ and appeared to reduce the number of incident cases of CIN2+ that developed more than 12 months after cryotherapy.

The accuracy of colposcopic grading for detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia

OBJECTIVE

To relate aspects of online colposcopic image assessment to the diagnosis of grades 2 and 3 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN 2+).

METHODS

To simulate colposcopic assessment, we obtained digitized cervical images at enrollment after acetic acid application from 919 women referred for equivocal or minor cytologic abnormalities into the ASCUS-LSIL Triage Study. For each, 2 randomly assigned evaluators from a pool of 20 colposcopists assessed images using a standardized tool online. We calculated the accuracy of these assessments for predicting histologic CIN 2+ over the 2 years of study. For validation, a subset of online results was compared with same-day enrollment colposcopic assessments.

RESULTS

Identifying any acetowhite lesion in images yielded high sensitivity: 93% of women with CIN 2+ had at least 1 acetowhite lesion. However, 74% of women without CIN 2+ also had acetowhitening, regardless of human papillomavirus status. The sensitivity for CIN 2+ of an online colpophotographic assessment of high-grade disease was 39%. The sensitivity for CIN 2+ of a high-grade diagnosis by Reid Index scoring was 30%, and individual Reid Index component scores had similar levels of sensitivity and specificity. The performance of online assessment was not meaningfully different from that of same-day enrollment colposcopy, suggesting that these approaches have similar utility.

CONCLUSIONS

Finding acetowhite lesions identifies women with CIN 2+, but using subtler colposcopic characteristics to grade lesions is insensitive. All acetowhite lesions should be assessed with biopsy to maximize sensitivity of colposcopic diagnosis with good specificity.

Colposcopy to evaluate abnormal cervical cytology in 2008

The rates of cervical cancer in the United States are low in comparison with developing nations. Whereas the Papanicolaou smear has performed well in terms of detecting both precursors of squamous cell carcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma of the cervix, this test has been less successful at identifying those women with the highest-risk premalignant disease. The use of human papillomavirus testing has also contributed to the improved sensitivity of screening for cervical cancer. In light of this, the colposcopy clinic retains high referral rates yet has poor diagnostic accuracy. Unfortunately, patients are triaged to follow-up for abnormal Papanicolaou smears based on algorithms that rely on the less evidence-based techniques of colposcopy. Therefore, the need to improve the specificity of colposcopic-guided biopsy remains. The colposcopic procedure is highlighted in this review and evaluated in terms of current literature on technique, the colposcopic impression, cervical biopsy, and methods proposed to enhance appreciation of the highest-risk lesions. By outlining certain flaws in technique and discussing the proposal of new tests to supplement the current standard of care, this review aimed to highlight the need for future research to maintain sensitivity but improve the specificity of colposcopy.