Synchronous primary ovarian and endometrial cancers: a population-based assessment of survival

The pregnancy and oncology outcome of fertility-sparing management for synchronous primary neoplasm of endometrium and ovary

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy of fertility-preserving treatment for young women with synchronous primary neoplasm of endometrium and ovary.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed eight patients with concurrent primary grade 1 presumed stage IA endometrioid endometrial adenocarcinoma (EEA) or endometrial atypical hyperplasia (EAH) and primary stage I ovarian tumors who underwent fertility-sparing treatment in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University between April 2016 and December 2022.

RESULTS

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers (SEOC) accounted for 50% of these eight patients. The median age of patients was 30.5 years (range, 28-34 years). None of them received chemotherapy. The median treatment time was 4 months (range, 3-8 months). 87.5% (7/8) cases achieved complete response (CR), and the median time to CR was 3.8 months (range, 1.5-7.7 months). Among patients who got CR, none of them showed any signs of recurrence. Pregnancies and successful deliveries were achieved in 4 of 5 patients. Till September 2023, the median follow-up period was 50.5 months (range:15.2-85.2 months).

CONCLUSION

Fertility-sparing treatment is feasible for highly selected patients with synchronous neoplasm of the endometrium and ovary, but strict screening and monitoring are mandatory. Though the results of our limited cases are encouraging, long follow-up and more clinical data are required. Enrolled patients must be fully informed of the risks during conservative treatment.

The research progress on synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinoma (SEOC) is the most common combination of primary double cancer in the female reproductive system. The etiology and pathogenesis of SEOC remain unclear, and clinically, it is often misdiagnosed as metastatic cancer, affecting the formulation of treatment plans and prognosis for patients. This article provides a review of its epidemiology, pathological and clinical characteristics, risk factors, pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis.

Successful in vitro fertilization following conservative surgery for synchronous endometrioid tumor of ovary and uterus

BACKGROUND

Successful pregnancy outcome in women with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers is very rare. We report successful pregnancy outcome in a young woman managed conservatively for synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer.

CASE PRESENTATION

Thirty years old nulliparous lady presented following exploratory laparotomy, left salpingo-oophorectomy and hysteroscopic polypectomy for left adnexal mass. Histology revealed endometrioid carcinoma of left ovary and moderately differentiated adenocarcinoma in the resected polyp. She underwent staging laparotomy along with hysteroscopy which confirmed above findings without any evidence of further tumor spread. She was treated conservatively with high dose oral progestin (megestrol acetate, 160 mg) and leuprolide acetate 3.75 mg monthly injections for three months along with four cycles of carboplatin and paclitaxel based chemotherapy followed by monthly injection of leuprolide for further three months. After failure of spontaneous conception, she underwent ovulation induction for six cycles along with intrauterine insemination which failed. She underwent in vitro fertilization with donor egg followed by elective cesarean section at 37 weeks of gestation. She delivered a healthy baby of weight 2.7 kg. Intraoperatively 5 × 6 cm right ovarian cyst was found which drained chocolate coloured fluid on puncture and cystectomy was carried out. Histological examination revealed endometrioid cyst of right ovary. Uterus was spared as she wanted to preserve her fertility. She is being followed periodically and is normal nine months following delivery. She is on injection Depot medroxy progesterone acetate once every three months.

A Presentation of Synchronous Ovarian and Endometrial Endometrioid Adenocarcinoma From a Case of Suspected Ruptured Ectopic Pregnancy

A 32-year-old woman of child-bearing age who initially underwent surgical laparoscopy for suspected ruptured ectopic pregnancy with elevated serum β-human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) levels was unexpectedly found to have histologically diagnosed synchronous ovarian and endometrial endometrioid adenocarcinoma. She subsequently underwent another full completion staging surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy as she was unsuitable for fertility-sparing surgery. An elevated serum β-hCG level accompanied by clinical signs of acute abdominal pain, per vaginal bleeding, ultrasound features of abdominal free fluid in the pelvis and an adnexal mass warrants a high clinical suspicion for a ruptured ectopic pregnancy. However, it is important to recognize ovarian malignancy as a rare but differential diagnosis to suspected ectopic pregnancy in patients with acute abdomen. Fertility-sparing surgery may be considered for young patients seeking fertility, without compromising patient survival in women without synchronous gynecological cancers.

Uterine involvement in epithelial ovarian cancer and its risk factors

Background

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) is an extremely aggressive and lethal carcinoma. Specific data that identify high-risk groups with uterine involvement are not available. Thus, this study aimed to evaluate a gross number of women with EOC to obtain the frequency of uterine involvement and its risk factors.

Methods

This retrospective observational study was conducted on 1900 histologically confirmed EOC women, diagnosed and treated in our tertiary hospital from March 2009 to September 2020. Data including their demographic, medical and pathological findings were collected.

Results

From 1900 histologically confirmed EOC women, 347 patients were eligible for participations. The mean age of study patients was 51.31 ± 11.37 years with the age range of 25 to 87 years. Uterine involvement was detected in 49.6% (173) of the patients either macroscopic (47.4%) or microscopic (52.6%) types.

Uterine involvement was significantly associated with having AUB (P-value = 0.002), histological type of ovary tumor (P-value < 0.001), ovarian cancer stage (P-value < 0.001), and abnormal CA-125 concentration (P-value = 0.004).

Compared to the other study patient, the patients with metastatic uterine involvement had significantly higher stage (p-value< 0.001), higher grade of ovary tumor (p-value = 0.008), serous histological type (p-value< 0.001), and a higher level of CA-125 concentration (p-value< 0.001).

on the other hand, the patients with synchronous uterine cancer were significantly younger (p-value = 0.013), nulliparous (p-value< 0.001), suffered from AUB symptoms (p-value< 0.001) and had endometroid histological type (p-value = 0.010) of ovary cancer in comparison to other study patients.

Conclusion

Considering the high prevalence of uterine involvement in EOC patients, ultrasound evaluation and/or endometrium biopsy assessment should be done before planning any treatment.

Diagnostic workup for endometrioid borderline ovarian tumors (eBOT) requires histopathological evaluation of the uterus

Background

For young borderline ovarian tumor (BOT) patients, preservation of the uterus was incorporated as an accepted option into treatment guidelines. For the endometrioid subtype (eBOT) however, adequate histological evaluation is challenging and might be associated with synchronous endometrial disorders or misinterpreted as spread from uterine primaries.

Case presentation

We report the cases of two young patients with eBOT who underwent treatment according to current guidelines. In both cases, unexpected findings of invasive uterine carcinomas were established in final histopathological evaluation.

Conclusions

This constellation highlights the challenging diagnostic workup of BOT and underlines that uterine curettage is indispensable for eBOT to exclude uterine primary tumors when fertility preservation is planned. Accordingly, we suggest to include this procedure into recommendations for diagnostic workup and to state the potential risk in treatment guidelines.

A Review of the Clinical Characteristics and Novel Molecular Subtypes of Endometrioid Ovarian Cancer

Ovarian cancer is one of the most common gynecologic cancers that has the highest mortality rate. Endometrioid ovarian cancer, a distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer, is associated with endometriosis and Lynch syndrome, and is often accompanied by synchronous endometrial carcinoma. In recent years, dysbiosis of the microbiota within the female reproductive tract has been suggested to be involved in the pathogenesis of endometrial cancer and ovarian cancer, with some specific pathogens exhibiting oncogenic having been found to contribute to cancer development. It has been shown that dysregulation of the microenvironment and accumulation of mutations are stimulatory factors in the progression of endometrioid ovarian carcinoma. This would be a potential therapeutic target in the future. Simultaneously, multiple studies have demonstrated the role of four molecular subtypes of endometrioid ovarian cancer, which are of particular importance in the prediction of prognosis. This literature review aims to compile the potential mechanisms of endometrioid ovarian cancer, molecular characteristics, and molecular pathological types that could potentially play a role in the prediction of prognosis, and the novel therapeutic strategies, providing some guidance for the stratified management of ovarian cancer.

Ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer: a 2-step schema

In 2020, endometrial cancer continues to be the most common gynecologic malignancy in the United States. The majority of endometrial cancer is low grade, and nearly 1 of every 8 low-grade endometrial cancer diagnoses occurs in women younger than 50 years with early-stage disease. The incidence of early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer is increasing particularly among women in their 30s. Women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer generally have a favorable prognosis, and hysterectomy-based surgical treatment alone can often be curative. In young women with endometrial cancer, consideration of ovarian conservation is especially relevant to avoid both the short-term and long-term sequelae of surgical menopause including menopausal symptoms, cardiovascular disease, metabolic disease, and osteoporosis. Although disadvantages of ovarian conservation include failure to remove ovarian micrometastasis (0.4%-0.8%), gross ovarian metastatic disease (4.2%), or synchronous ovarian cancer (3%-5%) at the time of surgery and the risk of future potential metachronous ovarian cancer (1.2%), ovarian conservation is not negatively associated with endometrial cancer-related or all-cause mortality in young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. Despite this, utilization of ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer remains modest with only a gradual increase in uptake in the United States. We propose a framework and strategic approach to identify young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer who may be candidates for ovarian conservation. This evidence-based schema consists of a 2-step assessment at both the preoperative and intraoperative stages that can be universally integrated into practice.

Ovarian endometrioid carcinoma and clear cell carcinoma: A 21-year retrospective study

Objective

This study aimed to identify the clinical characteristics of Chinese patients with ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (EC) and clear cell carcinoma (CCC) and to assess the impact of concurrent endometriosis on this group.

Methods

The present study reviewed the medical records of patients who received initial treatment and a postoperative pathological diagnosis of EC or CCC at our center in China between 1998 and 2018.

Results

Of 211 patients, 73 had pure EC, and 91 had pure CCC, and the remaining 47 had mixed cancer. The proportion of EC and CCC remained stable over past 21 years. The proportion of EC declined with aging and the age of EC onset to incline to the young. And the age of CCC onset had two peaks, namely, 36 and 77 years. After review by the pathologist, the number of endometriosis cases found in the pathological section of the analysis increased to 114, accounting for 54% of patients. As the stage progressed, the appearance of endometriosis became increasingly scarce in pathological sections(p = 0.001).

Compared with CCC, EC had a higher frequency of concurrent endometrial cancer (independent endometrial lesions) and estrogen and progesterone receptor expression(p = 0.000). And more patients were in premenopausal state in EC group(p = 0.040).

In the pure group, multivariate analysis showed that correlation existed between relevance to endometriosis and worse outcomes(p = 0.041). In patients with mixed cancer, mixed endometrioid histology was associated with better survival than other subtypes, even with stage III or poorly differentiated tumors(p = 0.001).

Conclusions

CCC and EC which are common in ovarian cancer patients who have associated with endometriosis have distinct clinicopathological characteristics. Attention should be paid to ovarian cancer patients with a history of endometriosis and those with concurrent endometriosis in pathological sections.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13048-021-00804-1.

Clonal relationship and directionality of progression of synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas in patients with DNA mismatch repair-deficiency associated syndromes

Sporadic synchronous endometrial (ECs) and ovarian cancers (OCs), although clinically considered to be independent primaries, have been shown to be clonally related and likely constitute metastases from each other. We sought to define whether synchronous ECs/OCs in patients with DNA mismatch repair (MMR)-deficiency syndromes would be clonally related. We subjected synchronous ECs/OCs from four patients (LS3-LS6) with clinically confirmed Lynch syndrome (LS) and one patient with constitutional mismatch repair-deficiency syndrome (CMMRD) to massively parallel sequencing targeting 468 cancer-related genes. Somatic mutations, copy number alterations (CNAs), clonal relatedness and clonal decomposition analyses were performed using previously described bioinformatics methods. All synchronous ECs/OCs analyzed were considered independent primaries based on clinicopathologic criteria. Sequencing analysis revealed that the ECs/OCs of three cases (LS2-CMMRD, L3, L4) harbored similar repertoires of somatic mutations and CNAs and were clonally related. In these three cases, a subset of subclonal mutations in the EC became clonal in the OC, suggesting that the EC was likely the substrate from which the OC developed. LS5's EC/OC had distinct mutational profiles but shared specific CNAs. In contrast, LS6's EC/OC harbored distinct somatic mutations and lacked CNAs, consistent with each tumor constituting an independent primary lesion. In LS5 and LS6, PTEN mutations and PTEN loss of protein expression were found to be restricted to the EC. Finally, re-analysis of sequencing data of sporadic synchronous ECs/OCs supported the observations made in the current study that the directionality of progression is likely from the endometrium to the ovary. In conclusion, contrary to sporadic synchronous ECs/OCs, which are almost invariably clonally related, ECs/OCs simultaneously involving the uterus and ovary in LS patients may represent distinct primary tumors. A subset of MMR-deficiency syndrome-related synchronous ECs/OCs, however, may originate from a single primary tumor at variance with their clinical diagnosis, with the endometrium being the likeliest site of origin.

Fertility-sparing treatment for intramucous, moderately differentiated, endometrioid endometrial cancer: a Gynecologic Cancer Inter-Group (GCIG) study

OBJECTIVE

'The Endometrial Cancer Conservative Treatment (E.C.Co.). A multicentre archive' is a worldwide project endorsed by the Gynecologic Cancer Inter-Group, aimed at registering conservatively treated endometrial cancer (EC) patients. This paper reports the oncological and reproductive outcomes of intramucous, G2, endometrioid EC patients from this archive.

METHODS

Twenty-three patients (Stage IA, G2, endometrioid EC) were enrolled between January 2004 and March 2019. Primary and secondary endpoints were, respectively, complete regression (CR) and recurrence rates, and pregnancy and live birth rates.

RESULTS

A median follow-up of 35 months (9-148) was achieved. Hysteroscopic resection (HR) plus progestin was adopted in 74% (17/23) of cases. Seventeen patients showed CR (median time to CR, 6 months; 3-13). Among the 6 non-responders, one showed persistence and 5 progressed, all submitted to definitive surgery, with an unfavorauble outcome in one. The recurrence rate was 41.1%. Ten (58.8%) complete responders attempted to conceive, of whom 3 achieved at least one pregnancy with a live-birth. Two out of the 11 candidate patients underwent definitive surgery, while the remaining 9 have so far refused. To date, 22 patients show no evidence of disease, and one is still alive with disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Fertility-sparing treatment seems to be feasible even in G2 EC, although caution should be kept considering the potential pathological undergrading or non-endometrioid histology misdiagnosis. The low rate of attempt to conceive and of compliance to definitive surgery underline the need for a 'global' counselling extended to the follow-up period.

Fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Contemporary oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives

AIM

Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) can be a devastating diagnosis in women of reproductive age who desire future fertility. However, in early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered in appropriately selected patients.

METHODS

This is a narrative descriptive review of the recent literature on FSS for EOC from oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives.

RESULTS

The recurrence rate following FSS performed for stage I EOC in published retrospective studies collectively is 13% but ranges from 5 to 29%, while mortality ranges from 0 to 18%. Five-year disease-free survival following FSS is over 90% but decreases with higher stage and grade. Recurrences following FSS are more likely to be localized with a more favorable prognosis compared to recurrences following radical surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in women with high-risk disease, and strategies to minimize gonadotoxicity during chemotherapy such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be considered. Oocyte, embryo and/or ovarian cryopreservation can also be offered to patients desiring future biologic children. Reproductive outcomes following FSS, including pregnancy and miscarriage rates, resemble those of the general population, with a chance of successful pregnancy of nearly 80%.

CONCLUSION

In retrospective data, FSS appears to be oncologically safe in stage IA and IC grade 1-2 non-clear cell EOC. In patients with grade 3 tumors or clear cell histology, treatment can be individualized, weighing a slightly higher risk of recurrence with fertility goals. A multidisciplinary approach with oncology and reproductive endocrinology may be of utility to help these patients achieve their fertility goals.

Synchronous Cervical Adenocarcinoma and Ovarian Serous Adenocarcinoma-A Case Report and Literature Review

Background/Aim: Synchronous gynecological malignancies are rarely encountered, and most often these cases are represented by synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer. The aim of this paper is to present the case of a 53-year-old patient who was diagnosed with synchronous cervical and ovarian cancer. Case presentation: The patient had been initially investigated for vaginal bleeding and was submitted to a biopsy confirming the presence of a cervical adenocarcinoma. Once the diagnostic of malignancy was confirmed, the patient was submitted to a computed tomography which revealed the presence of large abdominal tumoral nodules of peritoneal carcinomatosis and was submitted to palliative chemotherapy with poor response. Eighteen months later she developed intestinal obstruction and was submitted to surgery. At that moment, synchronous ovarian and cervical tumors were diagnosed. Total radical hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymph node dissection, omentectomy, and pelvic peritonectomy was performed; in the meantime, the histopathological studies confirmed the presence of two synchronous malignancies. Conclusion: Although synchronous lesions are rarely encountered, this eventuality should not be omitted. In such cases, surgery should be taken in consideration and the intent of radicality should regard both lesions.

Synchronous primary cancers of endometrium and ovary vs endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis: an observational study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the ultrasound characteristics of patients with synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary vs those of patients with endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis.

METHODS

This was a single-institution retrospective observational study of patients with a histological diagnosis of endometrial cancer and an ovarian malignant mass, who had undergone preoperative ultrasound examination at our unit. Based on the histological diagnosis, patients were classified into two groups: those with synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary (synchronous group) and patients with endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis (metastasis group). We compared the ultrasound features of ovarian malignant masses and of endometrial cancers between the two groups. Student's t-test, Mann-Whitney U-test, χ² test or Fisher's exact test were used for comparisons of variables between the two histological groups, as appropriate.

RESULTS

We identified 131 patients, of whom 51 had synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary (synchronous group) and 80 had endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis (metastasis group). On ultrasound examination, ovarian masses in the synchronous group were more often multilocular-solid and less often bilateral than those in the metastasis group. With respect to the ultrasound features of the endometrial lesions, the median largest diameter was 29 (range, 11-118) mm in the synchronous group in comparison with 51.5 (range, 6-150) mm in the metastasis group (P < 0.0001). Endometrial lesions in the synchronous group presented more often with no myometrial infiltration and less often with a multiple-vessel pattern on color Doppler compared with the endometrial lesions in the metastasis group.

CONCLUSIONS

Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary have significantly different sonomorphological patterns compared with endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis. Ovarian masses in women with synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary appeared as unilateral multilocular-solid or solid masses, whereas ovarian masses in women with endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis were mostly bilateral solid masses. The different sonomorphology of these two cancers may facilitate their preoperative identification, helping the surgeon to determine optimum management for the patient. Copyright © 2019 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Combination of Scoring Criteria and Whole Exome Sequencing Analysis of Synchronous Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to distinguish synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian carcinomas from single primary tumor with metastasis by clinical pathologic criteria and whole exome sequencing (WES).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Fifty-two patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas (SEOCs) between 2010 and 2017 were reviewed and subjected to WES.

RESULTS

On the basis of the Scully criteria, 11 cases were supposed as synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian carcinomas, 38 cases as single primary tumor with metastasis, and the remaining 3 cases (S50-S52) cannot be defined. Through a quantization scoring analysis, 9 cases that were scored 0-1 point were defined as synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian carcinomas, and 42 cases that were scored 3-8 points were defined as single primary tumor with metastasis. Two of the undefined cases were classified into metastatic disease, and another one that scored 2 points (S52) was subjected to WES. S52 was deemed synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian carcinomas, with few shared somatic mutations and overlapping copy number varieties. The finding of a serous component examined from the uterine endometrium samples further illustrated that the case was synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian carcinomas.

CONCLUSION

By scoring criterion, SEOCs were divided into 2 groups: synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian carcinoma group and single primary tumor with metastasis group. The analysis of clonality indicated that the case that scored 2 (S52) can be considered as synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. Scoring criteria of clinical pathology, along with the study of the WES, may further identify the classification of SEOCs.

Comparison and analysis of the clinicopathological features of SCEO and ECOM

Objective

The aim of our study was to evaluate and compare the differences in the clinicopathological variables and overall survival (OS) of synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary (SCEO) and endometrial cancer with ovarian metastasis (ECOM). In addition, we aimed to determine the characteristics of and effective treatments for patients with SCEO to avoid misdiagnosis and overtreatment.

Materials and methods

A review of medical records from January 2009 to January 2017 revealed 111 patients with coexisting ovarian and endometrial carcinoma diagnosed at the Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University. Clinicopathological variables were analysed using the Chi square test and Student’s t test. The survival rate was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and statistical significance was analysed using the logarithmic rank test (univariate analysis).

Results

There were 51 cases of SCEO and 60 cases of ECOM. The mean age at diagnosis was 53.96 years and 55.41 years, respectively. There were no differences in age, menopausal status, BMI, CA125 level or complaints between the two groups. The 5-year survival rates were 58.8 and 36.7%, respectively (P < 0.001). Significant differences were found in the endometrial tumour classification, ovarian cancer stage, and lymph node and omentum metastasis between SCEO and ECOM.

Conclusions

The differences found between SCEO and ECOM are of great clinical significance. Our results reveal useful prognostic and clinicopathological features. More aggressive therapies should be administered to both SCEO and ECOM patients, especially elderly patients and those with menopause, endometrial tumours, advanced omentum metastasis, and lymph node dissection.

Guidelines to Aid in the Distinction of Endometrial and Endocervical Carcinomas, and the Distinction of Independent Primary Carcinomas of the Endometrium and Adnexa From Metastatic Spread Between These and Other Sites

In most cases of suspected endometrial neoplasia tumor origin can be correctly assigned according to a combination of clinical, radiologic, and pathologic features, even when the latter are based upon the examination of relatively small biopsy samples. However there are well-recognized exceptions to this rule which continue to create diagnostic difficulty, and sometimes difficulties persist even after the detailed examination of resection specimens. Among the most common problems encountered in practice are the distinction of primary endometrial and primary endocervical adenocarcinomas, and the determination of tumor origin when there is synchronous, multifocal involvement of gynecologic tract sites, for example the endometrium and the ovary. However, accurate diagnosis in these cases is important because this has significant staging, management and prognostic implications. In this review we discuss the value and limitations of key morphologic, immunophenotypic and molecular findings in these diagnostic scenarios.

Risk-based stratification of carcinomas concurrently involving the endometrium and ovary

OBJECTIVE

Determining whether carcinomas concurrently involving endometrium and ovary are independent primary tumors (IPTs) or endometrial carcinomas with ovarian metastases (at least stage IIIA endometrial cancers, IIIA-EC) using clinicopathologic criteria is often challenging. Recent genomic studies showed that most such tumors are clonally related. We sought to identify clinicopathologic features associated with clinical outcomes, and to separate women with these tumors into clinically low-risk and high-risk groups.

METHODS

We reviewed clinical and pathologic data from 74 women who, between 1993 and 2014, underwent primary surgery for endometrial cancer and had concurrent ovarian involvement.

RESULTS

The endometrial carcinomas were endometrioid (EECs, n = 41) or non-endometrioid (ENECs, n = 33). Nineteen (26%) cases were originally classified as IPTs using clinicopathologic criteria. Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node involvement (hazard ratio (HR) = 2.38, 95% CI 1.13-5.02, p = 0.023) and non-endometrioid endometrial tumor histology (HR = 6.27, 95% CI 2.6-15.13, p < 0.001) were associated with poorer progression-free survival (PFS). Multivariate analysis of 65 women with known lymph node status revealed two prognostically distinct groups: a high-risk group comprising ENECs with ≥50% myometrial invasion irrespective of lymph node status (n = 21; median PFS 12.7 months, 95% CI, 9.24-19.8); and a low-risk group consisting of all EECs, as well as lymph node-negative ENECs with <50% myometrial invasion (n = 44, median PFS not reached). The risk-based classification was superior to the original classification of endometrial cancers as IPTs vs. IIIA-EC for predicting PFS (log-rank test, p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.07).

CONCLUSION

Our proposed risk-based stratification enables categorization of women with concurrent endometrial and ovarian tumors according to their likely clinical outcomes.

Prognostic factors of synchronous endometrial and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma

Objective

Gynecologists occasionally encounter synchronous endometrial and ovarian endometrioid carcinoma (SEO-EC) patients who show favorable prognosis than locally advanced or metastatic disease patients. This study aimed to elucidate prognostic factors of SEO-EC and identify patients who have a sufficiently low risk of recurrence without receiving adjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 46 patients with pathologically confirmed SEO-EC who underwent surgery at the National Cancer Center Hospital between 1997 and 2016. Immunohistochemical evaluation of DNA mismatch repair (MMR) protein expression were performed for both endometrial and ovarian tumors. Patient outcomes were analyzed according to clinicopathologic factors.

Results

From the multivariate analysis, cervical stromal invasion indicated a worse prognosis for progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=6.85; 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.50–31.1) and overall survival (HR=6.95; 95% CI=1.15–41.8). Lymph node metastasis and peritoneal dissemination did not significantly affect survival. MMR deficiency was observed in 13 patients (28.3%), with both endometrial and ovarian tumors showing the same MMR expression status. MMR deficiency was not significantly associated with survival. Of 23 patients with lesions confined to only the uterine body and adnexa, only 2 had recurrence in the group receiving adjuvant therapy, while none of the 10 patients who did not receive adjuvant therapy had recurrence.

Conclusion

SEO-EC patients with tumors localized to the uterine body and adnexa lesions had a low risk for recurrence and may not require adjuvant therapy. SEO-EC may have prognostic factors different from those of endometrial and ovarian cancer.

Trends and outcomes of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer

This retrospective observational study examined trends, characteristics, and survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program between 1973 and 2013. Among 235,454 women with primary endometrial cancer, synchronous ovarian cancer was seen in 4,082 (1.7%) women with the proportion being decreased from 2.0% to 1.6% between 1983 and 2013 (P=0.049); and the proportion of concurrent endometrioid tumors in the two cancer sites has increased from 24.2% to 49.9% among SEOC women (P<0.001). When compared to endometrial cancer without synchronous ovarian cancer, endometrioid histology in the two cancer sites was associated with improved cause-specific survival while non-endometrioid histology in the ovarian cancer was associated with decreased cause-specific survival (adjusted-P<0.01). Among 110,063 women with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, synchronous endometrial cancer was seen in 3,940 (3.6%) women with the proportion being increased from 2.2% to 4.4% between 1973 and 2013 (P<0.001); and the proportion of concurrent endometrioid tumors in the two cancer sites had increased from 24.3% to 50.2% among SEOC women (P<0.001). When compared to primary epithelial ovarian cancer without synchronous endometrial cancer, SEOC was associated with better cause-specific survival if ovarian cancer is endometrioid type or if endometrial cancer is endometrioid type (adjusted-P<0.001). Across the two cohorts, the proportion of SEOC reached to the peak in the late-40 years of age and then decreased significantly (P<0.001). In conclusion, our study suggests that synchronous ovarian cancer has decreased among endometrial cancer whereas synchronous endometrial cancer has increased among epithelial ovarian cancer.

Evolving Roles of Histologic Evaluation and Molecular/Genomic Profiling in the Management of Endometrial Cancer

Endometrial cancers are the most common gynecologic malignancies. The staging of endometrial cancer has evolved from a clinical-based system to a comprehensive surgical-pathologic approach that allows for better risk stratification and treatment planning. Over the past few years, use of NCCN's sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping algorithm for the surgical staging of endometrial cancer has gained significant acceptance and is now commonly applied in many practices. However, pathologic evaluation of prognostic factors is beset by challenges, including the reproducibility of histologic classification and FIGO's grading, as well as the questionable clinical significance of low-volume tumor in SLNs. With the revelation of major genomic classes of endometrial cancer comes the potential for improved, reproducible, and prognostically relevant classification schemes, which integrate traditional pathologic parameters with genomic findings, to aid in treatment decisions. Pathologic identification of new variants of endometrial cancer, such as undifferentiated carcinoma, continues to advance the phenotypic spectrum of these tumors, spurring genomic and functional studies to further characterize their mechanistic underpinnings and potentially reveal new avenues for treatment. In the era of precision medicine, pathologic assessment of biomarkers (eg, mismatch repair proteins) and recognition of phenotypes that are amenable to specific targeted therapies (such as POLE-mutated tumors) have become integral to the management of women with endometrial carcinoma.

Utility of Additional Tissue Sections in Surgical Pathology

Background. To avoid diagnostic errors such as missed diagnosis and errors in staging tumors due to inadequate tissue sampling, pathologists submit additional sections (AS). Objective. This study assessed frequency, diagnostic yield, distribution, and cost of AS. Method. Among 1542 AS cases, we calculated mean AS per case; fraction of AS that altered diagnosis or stage; AS variation by tissue, malignant versus benign lesions, presence or absence of neoadjuvant therapy, mass, margin, lymph nodes, or other source, resident versus pathologist assistant (PA) dissector; and AS cost per case. Results. Overall 9.2 ± 8.8 AS were collected per case. In only 3.8% (58/1542) of cases AS altered diagnosis or stage. Urinary bladder cases provoked the most AS: 19.5 ± 15.1 per case. Significantly more AS came from malignant versus benign lesions (10.8 ± 9.7 vs 7.6 ± 7.5, P = <.0001) and from specimens treated with neoadjuvant therapy versus malignant lesions not so treated (12.3 ± 9.4 vs 10.3 ± 9.8, P = .02). Lymph nodes were sampled more heavily compared with mass, margin, and other sites combined (11.8 ± 11.4 vs 8.9 ± 8.4, P = .003), but in 78.4% (1209/1542) of cases, AS were from mass. Of diagnosis or stage altering AS cases, two thirds (38/58) were from masses, one fifth (11/58) from lymph nodes, a 10th (6/58) from margins, and a 20th (3/58) from other specimen sites. Resident versus pathologist assistant dissection caused no significant AS difference. AS contributed 40% cost per case. Conclusions. AS per case ranged widely; their diagnostic yield was low; they were highest in urinary bladder specimens, in malignant and particularly neoadjuvant-treated lesions. Although lymph nodes were most heavily sampled, most AS were from masses. Resident dissection did not increase AS and cost of AS was high.

Elucidating the pathogenesis of synchronous and metachronous tumors in a woman with endometrioid carcinomas using a whole-exome sequencing approach

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian (SEO) carcinomas involve endometrioid neoplasms in both the ovary and uterus at the time of diagnosis. Patients were traditionally classified as having independent primary SEO lesions or as having metastatic endometrioid carcinoma. Recent studies have supported that SEO tumors result from the dissemination of cells from one organ site to another. However, whether this can be considered a "metastasis" or "dissemination" remains unclear. In this report, we performed whole-exome sequencing of tumor samples from a woman with well-differentiated endometrioid SEO tumors and a clinical "recurrent" poorly differentiated peritoneal tumor that was diagnosed 8 years after the complete resection of the SEO tumors. Somatic mutation analysis identified 132, 171, and 1214 nonsynonymous mutations in the endometrial, ovarian, and peritoneal carcinomas, respectively. A unique mutation signature associated with mismatch repair deficiency was observed in all three tumors. The SEO carcinomas shared 57 nonsynonymous mutations, whereas the clinically suspected recurrent carcinoma shared only eight nonsynonymous mutations with the SEO tumors. One of the eight shared somatic mutations involved PTEN; these shared mutations represent the earliest genetic alteration in the ancestor cell clone. Based on analysis of the phylogenetic tree, we predicted that the so-called recurrent peritoneal tumor was derived from the same endometrial ancestor clone as the SEO tumors, and that this clone migrated and established benign peritoneal endometriosis where the peritoneal tumor later arose. This case highlights the usefulness of next-generation sequencing in defining the etiology and clonal relationships of synchronous and metachronous tumors from patients, thus providing valuable insight to aid in the clinical management of rare or ambiguous tumors.

Prognosis of women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer and synchronous stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer

OBJECTIVE

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer with endometrioid histology at two cancer sites typically presents with early-stage disease and is thought to have a good prognosis. We examined the survival of women with early-stage endometrioid endometrial cancer who had synchronous early-stage endometrioid ovarian cancer.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case-control study examining the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Result Program between 1973 and 2013. Survival of women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer with stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer (n=839) were compared to women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer without synchronous ovarian cancer (n=123,692) after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Women with synchronous stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer were more likely to be diagnosed recently, be younger, have stage IA disease, grade 1 tumors, to have undergone lymphadenectomy, and were less likely to receive radiotherapy compared to those without synchronous ovarian cancer (all, P<0.001). In a propensity score matched model, the presence of synchronous ovarian cancer was not associated with endometrial cancer-specific survival (10-year rates 96.0% versus 95.3%, P=0.97) or overall survival (85.6% versus 87.2%, P=0.10). Among tumors with concordant grades at the two cancer sites, survival was similar regardless of presence of synchronous ovarian tumors (grade 1 tumors, 10-year rate for overall survival, 88.2% versus 89.1%, P=0.40; and grade 2 tumors, 84.0% versus 85.8%, P=0.78).

CONCLUSION

Women with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer with synchronous stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer have a survival outcome similar to those with stage I endometrioid endometrial cancer without synchronous ovarian cancer.

Triple Synchronous Malignancies in Genital Tract; Primary Endometrial, Ovarian and Fallopian Tube Carcinoma: A Case Report

Synchronous malignancies, including three or more tumours, are extremely rare. Herein, we present a case of a woman with a concurrent simultaneous endometrial, ovarian and fallopian tubal carcinoma with different histopathological characteristics. A 55-year-old postmenopausal woman with a diagnosis of endometrial adenocarcinoma by pipelle biopsy, underwent surgical staging. Final pathology result was reported as synchronous stage IA grade 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma of the uterus, stage IA grade 2 mucinous adenocarcinoma of the right ovary and in situ serous cystadenocarcinoma of the right fallopian tube. In the postoperative period, patient followed without adjuvant therapy. To our knowledge, this a very rare case report in the literature of sychronous triple gynaecologic cancers including fallopian tube cancer and with the longest disease free survival time with over 39 months due to better prognosis than metastatic or advanced primitive diseases.

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian carcinomas: predictors of risk and associations with survival and tumor expression profiles

PURPOSE

Synchronous endometrial and ovarian tumors (SEOs) are diagnosed in 10% of ovarian cancer patients. We examined predictors of SEOs, evaluated associations of SEOs with survival and characterized ovarian tumor profiles using immunohistochemistry.

METHODS

We included patients with endometrioid (n = 180) and clear cell (n = 165) ovarian carcinoma identified from the Alberta Cancer Registry between 1979 and 2010 for whom we abstracted medical records and constructed tumor tissue microarrays (TMAs). A concurrent diagnosis of endometrial cancer was obtained from the medical chart. We used unconditional logistic regression to estimate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and Cox proportional hazards models to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs. Protein expression in ovarian tumors of patients with and without SEOs was evaluated using Fisher's exact test.

RESULTS

Comparing 52 patients with SEO tumors to 293 patients with endometrioid or clear cell ovarian carcinomas, endometriosis at the ovary (OR = 0.45, 95% CI = 0.23-0.87, p = 0.02) was the strongest predictor of decreased risk in multivariable models. Premenopausal status (OR = 2.17, 95% CI = 0.92-5.13, p = 0.08) and lower pre-treatment CA125 levels (OR = 0.17, 95% CI = 0.02-1.32, p = 0.09) showed weaker associations. There were no significant differences in survival between patients with or without SEO tumors. More patients with SEO tumors compared to endometrioid ovarian carcinoma were deficient in MLH1, PMS2 and PTEN (p ≤ 0.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Endometriosis may not be the mechanism by which SEO cancers arise. Altered tumor oncoprotein expression between women with and without SEOs indicates important biological differences although this did not translate into prognostic differences.

Fertility preserving treatment with hysteroscopic resection followed by progestin therapy in young women with early endometrial cancer

OBJECTIVE

To report our 15-year institutional experience of fertility-sparing treatment in young patients with early endometrial cancer (EC) treated by combined hysteroscopic resection and progestin therapy.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients (stage IA, G1 and 2 endometrioid EC) wishing to preserve their fertility were enrolled into this prospective study. Hysteroscopic resection was used to resect the tumor, endometrium adjacent to the tumor and myometrium underlying the tumor. Adjuvant hormonal therapy consisted of oral megestrol acetate or levonorgestrel intrauterine device for 6 months or more.

RESULTS

After 3 months from the progestin start date, 25 patients (89.3%) showed a complete regression (median time to complete regression, 3 months [range, 3-9 months]), two (7.1%) showed persistent disease, while one patient (3.6%) presented with progressive disease and underwent definitive surgery (stage IA, G3 endometrioid). At 6 months, one of the two patients with persistent disease underwent definitive surgery (stage IA, G1 endometrioid), while the other one was successfully re-treated. Two recurrences were observed (7.7%) both involving the endometrium and synchronous ovarian cancer. The median duration of complete response was 94.5 months (range, 8-175 months). More than half of the responders (57.7%) attempted to conceive with 93.3% and 86.6% pregnancy and live birth rates, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The addition of a standardized three-step resectoscopy to progestin would seem to improve the efficacy of progestin alone. High pregnancy and live birth rates were observed in women attempting to conceive.

Long-Term Oncologic and Reproductive Outcomes in Young Women With Early Endometrial Cancer Conservatively Treated: A Prospective Study and Literature Update

Objective

This study aimed to analyze the long-term oncologic and reproductive outcomes in endometrial cancer (EC) in young patients conservatively treated by combined hysteroscopic resection (HR) and levonorgestrel intrauterine device (LNG-IUD).

Methods

Twenty-one patients (age ≤ 40 years; Stage IA, G1-2 endometrioid EC), wishing to preserve their fertility, were enrolled into this prospective study. The HR was used to resect (1) the tumor lesion, (2) the endometrium adjacent to the tumor, and (3) the myometrium underlying the tumor. Hormonal therapy consisted of LNG-IUD (52 mg) for at least 6 months.

Results

The median follow-up time is 85 months (range, 30–114). After 3 months from the progestin start date, 18 patients (85.7%) showed a complete regression (CR), 2 (9.5%) showed persistent disease, whereas 1 patient (4.8%) presented with progressive disease and underwent definitive surgery (Stage IA, G3 endometrioid). At 6 months, 1 of the 2 persistences underwent definitive surgery (Stage IA, G1 endometrioid), whereas the other was successfully re-treated. Two recurrences (10.5%) were observed, both involving the endometrium and synchronous ovarian cancer (OC) (atypical hyperplasia and Stage IIB G1 endometrioid OC; Stage IA endometrioid G1 EC, and Stage IA G1 endometrioid OC). The median duration of complete response was 85 months (range, 8–117). Sixty-three percent of complete responders attempted to conceive with 92% and 83% pregnancy and live birth rates, respectively. To date, all patients are alive and have no evidence of disease.

Conclusions

After a long follow-up, combined HR and LNG-IUD would seem to improve the efficacy of progestin alone. High pregnancy and live birth rates were observed in women attempting to conceive. This approach is still experimental and should be offered only in the framework of scientific protocols conducted in cancer centers.

Synchronous uterine adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma: A rare case report causing a clinical conundrum

•

We present a rare case of concurrent uterine adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma.

•

Literature review confirms this is a very rare combination of synchronous tumors.

•

We discuss therapeutic challenges in synchronous gynecologic malignancies.

Introduction

Synchronous gynecologic primary cancers are uncommon. When present, the most frequent malignancies consist of endometrial and ovarian carcinomas. Here we report an exceedingly rare case of concurrent uterine adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma.

Case presentation

A 60 year-old female presented with four years of postmenopausal bleeding. An endometrial sampling showed grade 2 endometrioid adenocarcinoma. She proceeded with hysterectomy that contained an anterior endometrial mass and a posterior myometrial mass. The final pathology demonstrated concurrent uterine adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the third reported case of simultaneous uterine adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma. As this presentation is infrequent with limited literature, this caused a clinical management conundrum. Unfortunately, the follow-up PET scan suggested possible recurrence or metastasis three months after the surgery.

Conclusion

Simultaneous uterine adenocarcinoma and leiomyosarcoma is an exceptionally rare event. As the experience is limited, a multidisciplinary approach in managing these patients may be the best option currently available.

Does synchronous endometrioid endometrial cancer have any prognostic effect on Stage I endometrioid ovarian cancer?

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of synchronous endometrial endometrioid cancer (SEEC) on the prognosis of patients with Stage 1 endometrioid ovarian cancer (EOC).

STUDY DESIGN

Clinicopathological data of cases with Stage 1 EOC from January 2000 to November 2013 were retrieved from the computerized database of Etlik Zubeyde Hanim Women's Health and Research Hospital. Of the 31 patients included in the study, 15 patients had primary synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) (Group 1) and 16 patients had EOC alone (Group 2).

RESULTS

Ovarian cancer substage and grade were compared between the two groups, and no significant differences were found. Most of the patients with SEEC had Grade 1 tumours (n=13, 86.7%). In Group 1, nine (60.0%) patients had endometrial tumours with superficial myometrial invasion, and six (40.0%) patients had deep myometrial invasion. Median follow-up was 94 months. Ten-year disease-free survival rates were 92.9% for Group 1 and 84.6% for Group 2 (p=0.565).

CONCLUSION

Patients with Stage 1 EOC have excellent long-term survival. The presence of SEEC does not influence the prognosis of patients with Stage 1 EOC, even in the presence of deep myometrial invasion.

Massively Parallel Sequencing-Based Clonality Analysis of Synchronous Endometrioid Endometrial and Ovarian Carcinomas

Synchronous early-stage endometrioid endometrial carcinomas (EECs) and endometrioid ovarian carcinomas (EOCs) are associated with a favorable prognosis and have been suggested to represent independent primary tumors rather than metastatic disease. We subjected sporadic synchronous EECs/EOCs from five patients to whole-exome massively parallel sequencing, which revealed that the EEC and EOC of each case displayed strikingly similar repertoires of somatic mutations and gene copy number alterations. Despite the presence of mutations restricted to the EEC or EOC in each case, we observed that the mutational processes that shaped their respective genomes were consistent. High-depth targeted massively parallel sequencing of sporadic synchronous EECs/EOCs from 17 additional patients confirmed that these lesions are clonally related. In an additional Lynch Syndrome case, however, the EEC and EOC were found to constitute independent cancers lacking somatic mutations in common. Taken together, sporadic synchronous EECs/EOCs are clonally related and likely constitute dissemination from one site to the other.

Comparison of clinicopathologic variables in coexistence cancers of the endometrium and ovary: A review of 55 cases in an academic center in Iran

Background:

The coexistence primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary are relatively uncommon. The purpose of this study was to characterize patients diagnosed primary synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC), endometrial cancer (EC) with ovarian metastasis, and ovarian cancer (OC) with endometrial metastasis and compare clinicopathologic variables and prognosis.

Materials and Methods:

All the patients with diagnosis of both endometrium and OC, who hospitalized between 2002 and 2012 in an academic center affiliated to Tehran University of Medical Sciences, were evaluated with respect to different clinicopathologic variables, follow-up times, and outcomes.

Results:

Fifty-five patients had been diagnosed with both endometrium and OC. 17, 26, and 12 patients were diagnosed as SEOC, EC, and OC, respectively. The frequency of abnormal uterine bleeding was significantly lower in OC (16.7%) compared to others (58.8% in SEOC and 53.8% in EC). However, the abdominal/pelvic pain was significantly higher in OC (50%) compared to others (35.3% in SEOC and 34.6% in EC) (P < 0.05). Complex atypical hyperplasia (87.5%), endometriosis (88.8%), and endometrioid carcinoma (54.5%) was observed most in SEOC group. The duration of follow-up time was between 3 and 171 months with a mean of 16 months. There was no death in SEOC who followed. Survivals of patients between three group were statistically significant (P = 0.032).

Conclusion:

Our results showed that overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of SEOC patients is better than those with EC and OC (P = 0.032).

[Triple synchronous primary gynaecological tumours. A case report]

BACKGROUND

Synchronous multiple primary malignancies in the female genital tract are infrequent. From 50 to 70% of them corresponds to synchronous cancers of the endometrium and ovary. To our knowledge, this is only the third case report in the international literature of three concurrent gynaecological cancers of epithelial origin. A case is presented, as well as a literature review due to the infrequency of its diagnosis and the lack of information on the subject.

CLINICAL CASE

A 49-year-old woman, with previous gynaecological history of ovarian endometriosis. She underwent a hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy, as she had been diagnosed with endometrial hyperplasia with atypia. The final histopathology reported synchronous ovarian, Fallopian tube, and endometrial cancer. An extension study and complete surgical staging was performed, both being negative. She received adjuvant treatment of chemotherapy and radiotherapy. She is currently free of disease.

CONCLUSIONS

The aetiology is uncertain. There is controversy relating to increased susceptibility of synchronous neoplasms to pelvic endometriosis and inherited genetic syndromes. Its diagnosis needs to differentiate them from metastatic disease. Additionally, they are problematical from a clinical, diagnostic, therapeutic, and prognostic point of view. The presentation of more cases of triple synchronous cancers is necessary for a complete adjuvant and surgical treatment.

Prognostic factors in women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prognostic factors in women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers.

METHODS

Medical records of 3240 patients with endometrial cancer who had undergone primary surgery were collected from 7 institutions and were retrospectively reviewed. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) curves and rates were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Multivariate analysis to determine independent prognostic factors was performed using the Cox regression model.

RESULTS

The incidence of synchronous endometrial/ovarian cancer was 3.8% (123/3240 women). During the median follow-up period of 66 months, 33.3% and 26.1% of women developed recurrences and reported cancer-related deaths. The 5-year PFS and 5-year OS for all 123 women were 66.9% and 80.0%, respectively. In multivariate analysis, pretreatment CA-125 and tumor stage of the ovary showed prognostic significance about PFS (P = 0.043 and P = 0.027) and OS (P = 0.047 and P = 0.031), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment CA-125 and tumor stage of the ovary were independent prognostic factors for recurrence and survival.

Progestins in the fertility-sparing treatment and retreatment of patients with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer

Endometrial cancer is the most common gynecologic cancer in developed countries. Approximately 3%-14% of endometrial cancers are diagnosed in young women under 40 who want to preserve their fertility. The incidence of endometrial cancer in this age group is increasing, for which fertility-sparing therapy is increasingly used because it is one of the most important quality of life issues in these women. Progestin therapy is the most common type of fertility-sparing therapy. In this review, the most up-to-date findings regarding fertility-sparing progestin therapy for young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer is addressed in terms of diagnosis, treatment, follow-up, and oncologic and reproductive outcomes. Fertility-sparing progestin therapy is highly effective in selected young women with primary and recurrent endometrial cancer. The selection of appropriate patients through comprehensive pretreatment evaluation is of paramount importance to achieve the best outcomes without compromising survival. Because of the high rate of recurrence after successful fertility-sparing therapy, close surveillance is mandatory, and prophylactic hysterectomy is the best option for patients who have completed family planning. Pregnancy outcomes are very promising with the aid of assisted reproductive technologies. Continuous daily oral medroxyprogesterone acetate and megestrol acetate are the preferred progestins for fertility-sparing therapy, but future studies should be performed to determine the optimal dose and treatment duration of these agents.

Synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer--an international multicenter case-control study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to compare the prognosis of patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) to matched controls with either endometrial cancer (EC) or ovarian cancer (OC).

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study including all patients with SEOC who had been treated at 5 European tertiary gynecologic oncology centers between 1996 and 2011 and patients with either EC or OC matched for age, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) stage, histology, year of diagnosis, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance score.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 77, 132, and 126 patients with SEOC, EC, and OC, respectively. The patient characteristics confirmed an equal distribution of matching factors, and the median follow-up did not differ (P = 0.44). 48.1% of the patients with SEOC showed early FIGO stage I for both EC and OC. The 5-year PFS rates differed between SEOC and EC (76.3% vs 86.3%; P = 0.047) but not the 5-year overall survival rates (71.6% vs 79.8%; P = 0.12) and did not differ between SEOC and OC (76.3% vs 63.8%; P = 0.19 and 71.6% vs 69.3%; P = 0.61, respectively). After the adjustment for the FIGO stage of the 2 components of SEOC, neither PFS nor overall survival rates were different.

CONCLUSIONS

Prognosis of patients with SEOC tended to be the same in comparison with matched controls with either one EC or OC. Therefore, it could be considered that patients with SEOC may be eligible for clinical trials of the advanced tumor component if no additional therapy is indicated for the other component.

Synchronous primary ovarian and endometrial cancers: a series of cases and a review of literature

Synchronous cancers account for 0.7-1.8% of all gynecologic cancers. Among them, synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers are predominant (40-53%). Patients with synchronous cancers have better prognosis than those with single disseminated cancer. We present 10 patients with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers who were treated at the Chemotherapy Department of the Medical University of Lodz in 2009-2013. The most often reported symptom of the disease was abnormal vaginal bleeding (6 patients). The range of the patients’ age was 48-62 and the median age was 56. Five patients had stage I of ovarian cancer, single patients had stage IIA, IIB and IIIB, 2 patients had stage IIIC. Three patients had I, 5 – II, and 2 – III stage of endometrial cancer. All patients had endometrioid type of endometrial cancer, 7 of them had also the same histological type of ovarian cancer. All patients had adjuvant chemotherapy because of ovarian cancer, none of them had adjuvant radiotherapy. One patient was lost to follow up. For other patients a median follow up was 13 months (range: 3-53 months). One patient experienced relapse, all patients are alive. Synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers are usually diagnosed at an earlier stage, have lower histological grade and better prognosis than single cancers. The most common histological type of both endometrial and ovarian cancers is endometrioid carcinoma. The first symptoms reported by our patients and the course of the disease were concordant with data from the literature.

Synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary in young women: a Korean Gynecologic Oncology Group Study

OBJECTIVE

Some authors have recommended the use of diagnostic laparoscopy as a pretreatment assessment step for conservative hormonal treatment in young women with endometrial cancer. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of synchronous primary cancer of the endometrium and ovary in young women.

METHODS

The medical records of 3240 patients with endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery between 1995 and 2010 were collected from 7 institutions and were retrospectively reviewed. Low-risk endometrial cancer was defined as tumors without myometrial invasion; normal or benign-looking ovaries; normal CA-125; grade 1 endometrioid histology; and early stage endometrial cancer on pretreatment assessment.

RESULTS

Fifteen percent (471/3240) were younger than 40 years of age. The incidence of synchronous ovarian cancer in young women with endometrial cancer was 4.5% (21/471). In patients with low-risk endometrial cancer, synchronous cancers were not identified.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of synchronous ovarian malignancies in young women with endometrial cancer was quiet low (4.5%), unlike previous studies have revealed (11-29%). Therefore, diagnostic laparoscopy is not mandatory in patients with low-risk early stage endometrial cancer selected for conservative treatment to confirm the absence of ovarian malignancy.

Simultaneous early ovarian and endometrial cancer treated conservatively with spontaneous pregnancy

INTRODUCTION

Young cancer patients increasingly request fertility sparing alternatives to their cancer treatments, which they should be offered when allowed so by the risk-benefit balance and after obtaining informed consent.

CASE PRESENTATION

Here, we report the case of a 25 year-old nulliparous patient who presented with a synchronous endometrioid ovarian and endometrial carcinoma. She was able to conduct a full-term spontaneous pregnancy after conservative surgical treatment followed by adjuvant chemotherapy and hormonal treatment. Fertility sparing treatment is feasible in selected cases of synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers. Thorough follow-up remains mandatory.

CONCLUSION

This case demonstrates some interesting and unique features of synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers since it resulted in a spontaneous pregnancy and normal delivery.

Preoperative identification of synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancers: the importance of appropriate workup

OBJECTIVE

For treatment of patients with both endometrial and ovarian cancer, it is important to discriminate between 2 primary tumors and metastatic disease. Currently, criteria are based on postoperative findings. The aim of this study was to determine whether clinical parameters can discriminate between these groups preoperatively and whether a practical guideline could improve appropriate workup and treatment.

METHODS

A total of 45 patients with a diagnosis of both endometrium and ovarian cancer between 1998 and 2009 and were included for analysis. Clinical and pathological data were obtained, and initial CA-125 was registered; patients had a diagnosis of 2 primary tumors or tumors with metastasis. All patients were reclassified according to workup and treatment.

RESULTS

Patients with synchronous primary tumors were significantly younger, presented more often with abnormal uterine bleeding, and had a lower initial CA-125 than both metastatic groups (P < 0.05). With age and CA-125 included in a polytomic logistic regression model, 83.3% of diagnoses could be classified correctly. In 15 of 17 patients presented with adnexal mass, workup was incomplete owing to lack on information of the endometrial status. In patients presenting with abnormal uterine bleeding, 13 of 21 patients had an incomplete workup leading to staging laparotomy secondary to initial surgical treatment in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancers are young, often present with abnormal uterine bleeding and have a low initial CA-125. Adequate workup with attention to both ovarian and endometrial status, especially in young patients with a wish to preserve fertility, is important to make the right decision for treatment.

Endometrial Cancer: Comparison of Patients with Synchronous Primary Carcinoma of the Endometrium and Ovary vs. Endometrial Carcinoma with Ovarian Metastases

Purpose: The aim of our study was to investigate the rate of secondary carcinomas in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC). In particular, we wanted to describe the subset of patients with endometrial and simultaneous ovarian carcinoma (OC), including outcomes. The study also compared patients with EC and ovarian metastasis with patients with EC and simultaneous OC. Patients and Methods: Data from 251 patients with primary endometrial carcinoma who underwent surgery in the years 2005-2009 at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Tübingen, were analysed retrospectively. Results: A total of 28 patients (11.1 %) had a secondary carcinoma: 18 patients (7.1 %) had OC; 9 (3.5 %) patients had a history of breast cancer, and one patient (0.4 %) respectively had simultaneous carcinoma of the vulva or bladder. 14 patients (5.5 %) had advanced stage EC with ovarian metastasis or, in one case, metastasis to the ovarian tube. Patients with ovarian metastasis had a mean age of 71.2 ± 9.2 years at primary diagnosis, making them significantly older compared to patients with EC and simultaneous OC (55.3 ± 11.8 years, p < 0.001). Moreover, patients with ovarian metastasis significantly more often had EC with a higher tumour grade (grade 1: 0, grade 2: 21.4 %, grade 3: 78.6 %) compared to patients with simultaneous EC and OC (grade 1: 11.1 %, grade 2: 77.8 %, grade 3: 11.1 %; p < 0.001). Conclusion: Almost one in 10 patients with EC had a secondary carcinoma. The most common secondary carcinoma was OC followed by breast cancer. This should be taken into account in the diagnosis and therapy of patients with EC. Patients with simultaneous EC and OC were significantly younger than patients with EC and ovarian metastasis. In addition, their tumour had better prognostic features: thus, the tumour grade of the EC was significantly lower. Overall, the prognosis for patients with synchronous EC and OC is better than that for patients with EC and ovarian metastasis.

Synchronous primary corpus and ovarian cancer: High incidence of endometriosis and thrombosis

In an attempt to clarify the clinical characteristics of synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancer (SPC), we reviewed the clinicopathological features of 13 cases treated in the Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics at Kyoto University Hospital over the last 6 years and compared them with 186 cases of primary uterine corpus cancer (PCC) and 136 cases of primary ovarian cancer (POC). Comparisons were performed based on clinicopathological factors, including age, BMI, parity, complication of thrombosis and FIGO stage. For SPC patients, the mean age was 51.5 years; 6 (46%) were nulliparous, and 7 (53%) had complicated thrombosis. All had well-differentiated endometrial cancer and 12 (92%) had endometrioid cancer in the ovary. The mean age of the SPC patients was significantly lower than that of the PCC patients (51.5 vs. 58.9 years). Thrombosis occurred in the SPC patients at a significantly higher rate than in both the PCC and POC patients. When the incidence of endometriosis and the regularity of menstruation were compared between patients who developed SPC with those who develop PCC at a young age (under 45 years), the SPC patients exhibited a significantly higher rate of endometriosis (100 vs. 35%), whereas the PCC patients exhibited a higher rate of irregular menstruation (53 vs. 15%, p=0.05). As for thrombosis, the age and FIGO stage of thrombosis-positive patients were significantly higher than those of thrombosis-negative patients in PCC and POC, while in SPC patients there was no such difference. In conclusion, this study demonstrated the differences in clinical features between SPC and PCC, and also novel features of SPC, namely endometriosis and thrombosis, which are essential in the management of this disease.

Incidence and factors associated with synchronous ovarian and endometrial cancer: a population-based case-control study

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the incidence of synchronous endometrial cancer (EC) and ovarian cancer (OC) in the female population, among all women with EC, and in women under 50 years of age with EC, and to identify factors associated with synchronous EC/OC.

METHODS

All cases of synchronous EC/OC and EC diagnosed in women residing in Olmsted County, Minnesota between 1/1/1945 and 12/31/2008 were identified. Incidence was estimated using the population denominator from decennial census data, corrected for hysterectomy prevalence. A case-control study using 15 identified cases (EC/OC) and 45 controls (EC alone) was performed.

RESULTS

The incidence of synchronous EC/OC and EC (age-adjusted to the 2000 US female total and corrected for hysterectomy prevalence) in 1945-2008 was 0.88 and 30.3 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Among women under 50 years of age, the corrected incidence of EC/OC and EC was 0.51 and 5.1 per 100,000 person-years, respectively. Among all women with EC, 3.1% had a synchronous OC compared to 9.4% of women under 50 years of age with EC. Patients with synchronous EC/OC were more likely than those with EC alone to present with a pelvic mass (57.1% vs. 8.9%, p<0.001). Patients with EC alone were more likely to have used oral contraceptive pills (OCPs) than synchronous EC/OC cases (22.7% vs 0%; Odds ratio, 0.10; 95% CI, <0.01-0.87).

CONCLUSION

Although the incidence of synchronous EC/OC in the general population is lower than previously reported, nearly 1 in 10 women diagnosed with EC under 50 years of age will have a synchronous OC.

Early detection of recurrent ovarian cancer in patients with low-level increases in serum CA-125 levels by 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography

PURPOSE

Serum CA-125 has been shown to be a sensitive tumor marker of recurrent ovarian cancer. The goal of this study was to evaluate the use of 2-[F-18]fluoro-2-deoxy-d-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT) in the early detection of recurrent ovarian cancer in patients with low-level increases in serum CA-125 levels.

METHODS

Patients who demonstrated a normalization of serum CA-125 levels after complete remission of ovarian cancer were recruited for this study. FDG-PET/CT was performed to evaluate serum CA-125 levels ≥ 35 U/mL (Group 1) or progressive low-level increases in the levels of serum CA-125 (Group 2). The results were analyzed based on pathology, disease progression, and/or clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven (27) consecutive patients consented to the aforementioned criteria (n = 16 in Group 1 and n = 11 in Group 2). In Group 1, of the 16 patients, 15 had a proven tumor recurrence, and the remaining 1 had a second primary cancer with no evidence of recurrent ovarian lesions. In Group 2, all 11 patients had recurrent tumors. The use of FDG-PET/CT allowed the detection of recurrences in 25 patients and a second primary cancer in 1 patient, which included all of the patients in Group 1 and 10 of the 11 patients in Group 2. The detection rate of FDG-PET/CT for recurrent ovarian cancer was 100% in Group 1 and 90.9% in Group 2 (15/15 vs. 10/11, p = 0.423). FDG-PET/CT changed the intended management in 14 (53.8%) of the patients, which included 4 cases in Group 1 and 10 cases in Group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

FDG-PET/CT has the ability to detect recurrent ovarian cancer and second primary tumors in patients with increased levels of serum CA-125. FDG-PET/CT affects the clinical management by localizing recurrent lesions and creating a specific treatment plan for each patient, especially patients who demonstrate a low-level increase in serum CA-125 levels.

Uterine metastases in ovarian carcinoma: frequency and survival in women who underwent hysterectomy

OBJECTIVE

Possible reasons for hysterectomy in the initial surgical management of advanced invasive epithelial ovarian carcinoma (EOC) might be a high frequency of uterine involvement and its impact on survival. The aim of the present study was to describe the frequency of uterine involvement and its association with survival in an unselected population of EOC patients who underwent hysterectomy.

METHODS

All incident cases of EOC diagnosed in Israeli Jewish women between March 1994 to June 1999, were identified within the framework of a nationwide case-control epidemiological study. The target population of the present report includes all stage II-IV EOC patients who had a uterus at the time of diagnosis. Of the 822 such patients, 695 fulfilled the inclusion criterion. Excluded were 141 patients for various reasons. The present analysis is based on the remaining 554 patients.

RESULTS

Uterine involvement was present in 291 (52.5%) of the patients and it was macroscopic in only 78 (14.1%). The serosa was the most common site of isolated metastases. Multivariate analysis showed that advanced stage significantly increased the risk for uterine involvement. The overall median survival with any uterine involvement was significantly lower compared to those with no involvement (38.9 months vs. 58.0 months; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

There is an association between uterine involvement, whether macro- or microscopic, and lower survival even after hysterectomy although residual tumor could not be included in the analysis. Further studies are required to establish whether uterine involvement itself is an unfavorable risk factor or merely a marker of other unfavorable prognostic factors.

Characteristics and prognosis of coexisting adnexa malignancy with endometrial cancer: a single institution review of 51 cases

Objective

To explore and compare the differences in the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of synchronous primary endometrial and ovarian cancers with primary endometrial cancer metastatic to adnexa.

Materials and methods

Between January 1997 and December 2009, 51 cases with endometrial cancer simultaneously with adnexa malignancy were identified. Among them, there were 18 cases with synchronous primary cancers of the endometrium and ovary (Group A) and 33 cases with primary endometrial cancer metastatic to the adnexa (Group B). Clinical and pathologic information was obtained from medical records. Parametric methods were used to compare clinical and pathologic features. Kaplan–Meier survival analysis was performed and compared using log-rank test.

Results

The mean age at diagnosis of the disease was 56.6 ± 10.8 years (range 34–76 years) in Group A and 53.1 ± 9.5 years (range 37–76 years) in Group B. The two groups’ distribution of preoperative image findings, size of endometrial lesion, myometrial invasion, unilateral or bilateral, cervix invasion, and postoperative radiation existed significant differences. With a mean follow-up time of 4.3 ± 3.4 years (range 2–11 years), 5-year overall survival (OS) was 75 and 56% in Groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.034). The univariate analysis showed only postoperative radiation and synchronous tumors were independent factors which affected OS (p = 0.015; p = 0.034) and progression-free survival (PFS) (p = 0.015; p = 0.036), respectively. Not any feature was revealed by multivariate analysis as independent prognostic factors.

Conclusion

Our results showed that OS and PFS of synchronous primary ovarian cancer in patients with endometrial cancer is better than those with ovarian metastasis patients. Pre- and intra-operative, intensive and careful assessment, and strict and continuous postoperative surveillance should pay attention to the endometrial cancer patients who preserved ovary for having possibility of coexisting occult ovarian lesions.