1
|
Rimel BJ, Enserro D, Bender DP, Jackson CG, Tan A, Alluri N, Borowsky M, Moroney J, Hendrickson AW, Backes F, Swisher E, Powell M, MacKay H. NRG-GY012: Randomized phase 2 study comparing olaparib, cediranib, and the combination of cediranib/olaparib in women with recurrent, persistent, or metastatic endometrial cancer. Cancer 2024; 130:1234-1245. [PMID: 38127487 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/06/2023] [Indexed: 12/23/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This paper reports the efficacy of the poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor olaparib alone and in combination with the antiangiogenesis agent cediranib compared with cediranib alone in patients with advanced endometrial cancer. METHODS This was open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial (NCT03660826). Eligible patients had recurrent endometrial cancer, received at least one (<3) prior lines of chemotherapy, and were Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 to 2. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1), stratified by histology (serous vs. other) to receive cediranib alone (reference arm), olaparib, or olaparib and cediranib for 28-day cycles until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population. Homologous repair deficiency was explored using the BROCA-GO sequencing panel. RESULTS A total of 120 patients were enrolled and all were included in the intention-to-treat analysis. Median age was 66 (range, 41-86) years and 47 (39.2%) had serous histology. Median progression-free survival for cediranib was 3.8 months compared with 2.0 months for olaparib (hazard ratio, 1.45 [95% CI, 0.91-2.3] p = .935) and 5.5 months for olaparib/cediranib (hazard ratio, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.43-1.14] p = .064). Four patients receiving the combination had a durable response lasting more than 20 months. The most common grade 3/4 toxicities were hypertension in the cediranib (36%) and olaparib/cediranib (33%) arms, fatigue (20.5% olaparib/cediranib), and diarrhea (17.9% cediranib). The BROCA-GO panel results were not associated with response. CONCLUSION The combination of cediranib and olaparib demonstrated modest clinical efficacy; however, the primary end point of the study was not met. The combination was safe without unexpected toxicity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobbie J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Danielle Enserro
- Clinical Trials Development Division, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York, USA
| | - David P Bender
- University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa, USA
| | - Camille Gunderson Jackson
- University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Mercy Hospital Gynecologic Oncology, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Annie Tan
- Minnesota Oncology, Coon Rapids, Minnesota, USA
| | | | - Mark Borowsky
- Hackensack Meridian Health, Neptune, New Jersey, USA
| | - John Moroney
- University of Chicago Medicine, Schererville, Indiana, USA
| | | | - Floor Backes
- The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Ohio State Internal Medicine, Hilliard, Ohio, USA
| | | | - Matthew Powell
- Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - Helen MacKay
- Division of Medical Oncology & Hematology, Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mayer CM, O'Connor RM, Do AT, Cerda VR, Wang SM, Scott ME, Li AJ, Rimel BJ, Manuel MR, Taylor KN, Kim KH. Association between adherence to posttreatment National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) surveillance guidelines and detection of recurrent uterine cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2024; 181:8-11. [PMID: 38096674 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 11/22/2023] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To identify correlations between disease recurrence and adherence to NCCN posttreatment surveillance guidelines in patients who develop recurrent uterine cancer. METHODS Retrospective analysis identified patients (n = 60) with recurrent uterine cancer and at least one surveillance visit with a gynecologic oncologist between 2011 and 2020. Adherence to NCCN guidelines and details of recurrence were recorded. RESULTS Recurrent uterine cancer was identified in 60 patients with an average time to recurrence (TTR) of 25 months. Of those, 39 (65%) were adherent to NCCN surveillance guidelines and 36 (60%) were symptomatic at the time of recurrence diagnosis. Asymptomatic recurrence was diagnosed by imaging in 11 (46%), physical exam in 7 (29%), and blood work in 6 (25%) patients. Patients who were adherent to NCCN guidelines were diagnosed with recurrence on average 11 months earlier (p = 0.0336). Adherence was an independent predictor of TTR for all patients regardless of symptoms. There was no significant effect of age, race, primary language, or stage of disease on adherence. CONCLUSION Adherence to NCCN posttreatment surveillance guidelines for uterine cancer is independently associated with an earlier diagnosis of recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Mayer
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Reed M O'Connor
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Anthony T Do
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Victoria R Cerda
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Stephanie M Wang
- George Washington University, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Washington, DC 20052, USA
| | - Marla E Scott
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Andrew J Li
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Michael R Manuel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Kristin N Taylor
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Kenneth H Kim
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
O'Connor RM, Scott ME, Rimel BJ. Vaginal Cuff Dehiscence in Transgender Patients After Minimally Invasive Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:138-146. [PMID: 37925016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.10.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2023] [Revised: 09/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 11/06/2023]
Abstract
STUDY OBJECTIVE To compare rates of vaginal cuff dehiscence (VCD) in transgender patients with cisgender patients after minimally invasive hysterectomy (MIH). DESIGN We performed a single-surgeon, retrospective cohort analysis comparing the rates of VCD in patients undergoing MIH for gender affirmation with other indications (benign, malignant, prophylactic) with our study surgeon between January, 2015, and December, 2021. SETTING Major, urban, academic tertiary care hospital in the United States. PATIENTS 166 patients met inclusion criteria with 49 of those patients undergoing MIH (29.5%) for gender affirmation. Of the remaining 117 patients, 92 (78.6%) underwent MIH for cancer, 15 (12.8%) for prophylaxis, and 10 (8.5%) for benign indications. INTERVENTIONS Not applicable. MEASUREMENTS We assessed included patients for baseline demographics, presence of risk factors for VCD, details of index hysterectomy, and details of cuff dehiscence events. MAIN RESULTS Transgender patients tended to be younger at the time of surgery, but demographics were otherwise similar between both groups. Most transgender patients (n = 36, 73.5%) had both ovaries removed at the time of hysterectomy, 100% were on testosterone therapy pre- and postoperatively, and none used supplementary estrogen. Three of the 49 transgender patients (6.1%) experienced postoperative dehiscence of the vaginal cuff compared with 2 of the 117 cisgender patients (1.7%). This failed to reach statistical significance; however, our descriptive analysis showed that all cases of dehiscence in the cisgender group had identifiable precipitating factors (i.e., trauma). By comparison, all cases of dehiscence in the transgender group were spontaneous with few identifiable risk factors. CONCLUSION Transgender patients undergoing MIH may be at increased risk of VCD, although the rarity of this surgical complication precluded determination of statistical significance in our data set. We propose testosterone exposure as a possible risk factor for VCD, although we cannot exclude other factors, such as young age, as drivers of VCD in this population. Future studies of biospecimens are needed to evaluate for cellular differences in these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Reed M O'Connor
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology (Dr. O'Connor), Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Marla E Scott
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology (Drs. Scott and Rimel)
| | - B J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology (Drs. Scott and Rimel).
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rimel BJ, Chase DM, Perhanidis J, Ghazarian AA, Du EX, Wang T, Song J, Golembesky AK, Hurteau JA, Kalilani L, Salani R, Monk BJ. Cytochrome P450 inhibitor/inducer treatment patterns among patients in the United States with advanced ovarian cancer who were prescribed or were eligible for poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors in the first-line maintenance setting. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2024; 51:101332. [PMID: 38362364 PMCID: PMC10867570 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2024.101332] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Revised: 01/30/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are metabolized either via carboxylesterase (niraparib) or cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzymes (olaparib and rucaparib). Patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (aOC) who receive concomitant medication metabolized by the CYP system may be at risk of drug-drug interactions impacting PARPi efficacy and tolerability. This study investigated CYP inhibitor/inducer treatment patterns in the first-line maintenance (1Lm) setting for patients with aOC. This retrospective cohort study used de-identified databases of US patients with aOC. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with aOC between January 2015-March 2021, and received CYP inhibitors/inducers during 1Lm PARPi initiation or the eligibility window (90 days before to 120 days after first-line platinum-based therapy ended [index]). Patients were either prescribed 1Lm PARPi monotherapy (PARPi cohort) or were not prescribed any 1Lm therapy within 120 days post-index (PARPi-eligible cohort). Strong/moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers were defined as area under the plasma concentration-time curve ratio (AUCR) ≥2 or clearance ratio (CL) ≤0.5 (inhibitors), and AUCR ≤0.5 or CL ratio ≥2 (inducers). Of 1411 patients (median age 63), 158 were prescribed PARPis and 1253 were PARPi-eligible. Among the PARPi cohort, 46.2%, 48.7%, and 5.1% were prescribed niraparib, olaparib, and rucaparib, respectively. For patients prescribed olaparib or rucaparib, 42.4% also received strong and/or moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers. This real-world study indicated a considerable proportion of patients received strong and/or moderate CYP inhibitors/inducers and were prescribed PARPis metabolized by the CYP system. Understanding potential impacts of concomitant CYP inhibitors/inducers on PARPi efficacy and safety is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobbie J. Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Dana M. Chase
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Ritu Salani
- Gynecologic Oncology Division, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Bradley J. Monk
- HonorHealth Research Institute, University of Arizona, Creighton University, Phoenix, AZ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lin E, Sleboda P, Rimel BJ, Chen JT, Hernandez DV, Datta GD. Sexual orientation and gender identity inequities in cervical cancer screening by race and ethnicity. Cancer Causes Control 2024; 35:133-151. [PMID: 37599335 PMCID: PMC10764448 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01771-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 07/30/2023] [Indexed: 08/22/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the United States, inequities in preventive health behaviors such as cervical cancer screening have been documented. Sexual orientation, gender identity, and race/ethnicity all individually contribute to such disparities. However, little work has investigated their joint impact on screening behavior. METHODS Using sampling weighted data from the 2016 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we assessed differences in two metrics via chi-square statistics: 1) lifetime uptake, and 2) up-to-date cervical cancer screening by sexual orientation and gender identity, within and across racial/ethnic classifications. RESULTS Within all races, individuals who identify as members of sexual and gender minority (SGM) communities reported higher rates of never being screened (except for Black transgender men) than straight or cisgender individuals (p < 0.0001). [*START* Across all races, the Asian/Pacific Islander transgender population (32.4%; weighted n (w.n.) = 1,313) had the lowest proportion of lifetime screening, followed by the Asian/Pacific Islander gay/lesbian (53.0%, w.n. = 21,771), Hispanic transgender (58.7%; w.n. = 24,780), Asian/Pacific Islander bisexual (61.8%, w.n. = 54,524), and Hispanic gay/lesbian (69.6%, w.n. = 125,781) populations. *END*] Straight or cisgender Non-Hispanic White (w.n. = 40,664,476) individuals had the highest proportion of lifetime screening (97.7% and 97.5%, respectively). However, among individuals who had been screened at least once in their lifetime, identifying as SGM was not associated with a decreased proportion of up-to-date screening within or between races. CONCLUSIONS Due to small sample sizes, especially among Asian/Pacific Islander and Hispanic populations, confidence intervals were wide. Heterogeneity in screening participation by SGM status within and across racial/ethnic groups were observed. IMPACT These screening disparities reveal the need to disaggregate data to account for intersecting identities and for studies with larger sample sizes to increase estimate reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmeline Lin
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
| | - Patrycja Sleboda
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
| | - Bobbie J Rimel
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Jarvis T Chen
- Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School Of Public Health, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Diana V Hernandez
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
| | - Geetanjali D Datta
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lin E, Sleboda P, Rimel BJ, Datta GD. Inequities in colorectal and breast cancer screening: At the intersection of race/ethnicity, sexuality, and gender. SSM Popul Health 2023; 24:101540. [PMID: 37920304 PMCID: PMC10618777 DOI: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2023] [Revised: 10/13/2023] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To investigate the joint impact of sexual orientation, gender identity, and race/ethnicity on colorectal and breast cancer screening disparities in the United States. Methods Utilizing sampling weighted data from the 2016 and 2018 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, we assessed differences in two metrics via chi-square statistics: 1) lifetime uptake, and 2) up-to-date colorectal and breast cancer screening by sexual orientation and gender identity, within and across racial/ethnic classifications. Results Within specific races/ethnicities, lifetime CRC screening was higher among gay/lesbian (within NH-White, Hispanic, and Asian/Pacific Islander) and bisexual individuals (Hispanic) compared to straight individuals, and lowest overall among transgender women and transgender nonconforming populations (p < 0.05). Asian transgender women had the lowest lifetime CRC screening (13.0%; w.n. = 1,428). Lifetime breast cancer screening was lowest among the Hispanic bisexual population (86.6%; w.n. = 26,940) and Hispanic transgender nonconforming population (71.8%; w.n. = 739); within all races, SGM individuals (except NH-White, Hispanic, and Black bisexual populations, and NH-White transgender men) had greater breast cancer screening adherence compared to straight individuals. Conclusions Due to small, unweighted sample sizes, results should be interpreted with caution. Heterogeneity in screening participation by SGM status within and across racial/ethnic groups were observed, revealing the need to disaggregate data to account for intersecting identities and for studies with larger sample sizes to increase estimate reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emmeline Lin
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
| | - Patrycja Sleboda
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
| | - Bobbie J. Rimel
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Geetanjali D. Datta
- Cancer Research Center for Health Equity, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90069, USA
- Department of Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rimel BJ, Crane EK, Hou J, Nakayama J, MacDonald J, Lutz K, Makker V, O'Cearbhaill RE. Tyrosine kinase inhibitor toxicities: A society of gynecologic oncology review and recommendations. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 174:148-156. [PMID: 37207499 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Revised: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 05/10/2023] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have new indications for treatment in gynecologic malignancies. These targeted drugs have both unique and overlapping toxicities, which require careful attention and management. New combination therapies with immune-oncology agents have demonstrated promise in endometrial cancer. This review examines common adverse events associated with TKIs and provides readers with an evidence-based review on current uses and strategies for the management of these medications. METHODS A comprehensive review of the medical literature on TKI use in gynecologic cancer was undertaken by a committee approach. Details of each drug, its molecular target, and relevant data on both clinical efficacy and side effects were compiled and organized for clinical use. Information on drug-related secondary effects and management strategies for specific toxicities, including dose reduction and concomitant medications, were gathered. RESULTS TKIs can potentially offer improved response rates and durable responses for a group of patients who were previously without an effective standard second-line therapy. The combination of lenvatinib and pembrolizumab represents a more targeted approach to the drivers of endometrial cancer; however, there remains significant drug-related toxicity, and thus dose reduction and dose delay are frequently required. Toxicity management requires frequent check-ins and management strategies to help patients find the highest tolerable dose. TKIs are expensive and patient financial toxicity is as critical a measure of a drug's utility as any drug side effect. Many of these drugs have patient assistance programs, which should be fully utilized to minimize cost. CONCLUSIONS Future studies are needed to expand the role of TKIs into new molecularly driven groups. Attention to cost, durability of response, and long-term toxicity management is needed to ensure all eligible patients have access to treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobbie J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| | - Erin K Crane
- Levine Cancer Institute, Charlotte, NC, United States of America
| | - June Hou
- Columbia University Irvings Medical Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - John Nakayama
- Allegheny Health Network, Pittsburgh, PA, United States of America
| | - Jennifer MacDonald
- Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States of America
| | - Kathleen Lutz
- New York University Langone Health Perlmutter Cancer Center, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Vicky Makker
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| | - Roisin E O'Cearbhaill
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center and Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schwartz ZP, Li AJ, Walsh CS, Rimel BJ, Alvarado MM, Lentz SE, Cass I. Patterns of care and outcomes of risk reducing surgery in women with pathogenic variants in non-BRCA and Lynch syndrome ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 173:1-7. [PMID: 37030072 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2022] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Guidelines recommend risk-reducing bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) for women with pathogenic variants of non-BRCA and Lynch syndrome-associated ovarian cancer susceptibility genes. Optimal timing and findings at the time of RRSO for these women remains unclear. We sought to characterize practice patterns and frequency of occult gynecologic cancers for these women at our two institutions. METHODS Women with germline ovarian cancer susceptibility gene pathogenic variants who underwent RRSO between 1/2000-9/2019 were reviewed in an IRB-approved study. All patients were asymptomatic with no suspicion for malignancy at time of RRSO. Clinico-pathologic characteristics were extracted from the medical records. RESULTS 26 Non-BRCA (9 BRIP1, 9 RAD51C, and 8 RAD51D) and 75 Lynch (36 MLH1, 18 MSH2, 21 MSH6) pathogenic variants carriers were identified. Median age at time of RRSO was 47. There were no occurrences of occult ovarian or fallopian tube cancer in either group. Two patients (3%) in the Lynch group had occult endometrial cancer. Median follow up was 18 and 35 months for non-BRCA and Lynch patients, respectively. No patient developed primary peritoneal cancer upon follow up. Post-surgical complications occurred in 9/101 (9%) of patients. Hormone replacement therapy (HRT) was rarely used despite reported post-menopausal symptoms in 6/25 (23%) and 7/75 (37%) patients, respectively. CONCLUSIONS No occult ovarian or tubal cancers were observed in either group. No recurrent or primary gynecologic-related cancers occurred upon follow-up. Despite frequent menopausal symptoms, HRT use was rare. Both groups experienced surgical complications when hysterectomy and/or concurrent colon surgery was performed suggesting concurrent surgeries should only be performed when indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary P Schwartz
- Kaiser Permanente Panorama City Medical Center, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, 13640 Roscoe Blvd., Panorama City, CA 91402, USA.
| | - Andrew J Li
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Christine S Walsh
- University of Colorado Cancer Center, 1665 Aurora Court, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Cancer Center, 127 S. San Vicente Blvd., 7th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA.
| | - Monica M Alvarado
- Kaiser Permanente Southern California Regional Genetic Services, 393 E. Walnut St. 6 SW, Pasadena, CA 91188, USA.
| | - Scott E Lentz
- Kaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Gynecology Oncology Department, 4950 W., Sunset Blvd., Los Angeles, CA 90027, USA.
| | - Ilana Cass
- Dartmouth Hitchcock Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 1 Medical, Center Drive, Lebanon, NH 03756, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Blank SV, Huh WK, Bell M, Dilley S, Hardesty M, Hoskins ER, Lachance J, Musa F, Prendergast E, Rimel BJ, Shahin M, Valea F. Doubling down on the future of gynecologic oncology: The SGO future of the profession summit report. Gynecol Oncol 2023; 171:76-82. [PMID: 36827841 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2023.02.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Revised: 02/07/2023] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
The original vision of the field of gynecologic oncology was to establish a multidisciplinary approach to the management of patients with gynecologic cancers. Fifty years later, scientific advances have markedly changed the overall practice of gynecologic oncology, but the profession continues to struggle to define its value-financial and otherwise. These issues were examined in full at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology (SGO) Future of the Profession Summit and the purpose of this document is to summarize the discussion, share the group's perceived strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats (SWOT) for gynecologic oncologists, further educate members and others within the patient care team about the unique role of gynecologic oncologists, and plan future steps in the short- and long- term to preserve the subspecialty's critical mission of providing comprehensive, longitudinal care for people with gynecologic cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie V Blank
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, United States of America.
| | - Warner K Huh
- University of Alabama Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, United States of America
| | - Maria Bell
- MBA Sanford Women's Health, Sioux Falls, SD, United States of America
| | - Sarah Dilley
- Emory Healthcare, Atlanta, GA, United States of America
| | - Melissa Hardesty
- Alaska Women's Cancer Care, Anchorage, AK, United States of America
| | - Ebony R Hoskins
- Medstar Washington Hospital Center, Washington, D.C, United States of America
| | - Jason Lachance
- Maine Medical Partners, Scarborough, ME, United States of America
| | - Fernanda Musa
- Swedish Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA, United States of America
| | | | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Mark Shahin
- Abington Hospital, Jefferson Health, Willow Grove, PA, United States of America
| | - Fidel Valea
- Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine, New Hyde Park, NY, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Monk BJ, González-Martin A, Buckley L, Matulonis UA, Rimel BJ, Wu X, Moore KN, Mirza MR. Safety and management of niraparib monotherapy in ovarian cancer clinical trials. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2023:ijgc-2022-004079. [PMID: 36792166 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2022-004079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Niraparib is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor that has shown a significant improvement in progression-free survival irrespective of biomarker status in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer. This review focuses on the adverse events associated with niraparib and their management to maintain efficacy of niraparib treatment and improve quality of life for patients. In five trials assessing efficacy of niraparib in patients with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer (PRIMA, NOVA, NORA, QUADRA, and PRIME), treatment-emergent adverse events of any grade were reported in nearly all patients (≥99%) receiving niraparib; the events were grade ≥3 in 51-74% of patients. Across all lines of therapy, treatment-emergent adverse events led to dose interruptions in 62-80% of patients receiving niraparib and dose reductions in 47-71%. Hematologic events were most frequently reported, including thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia. Common non-hematologic events included gastrointestinal events, which were generally low grade (<5% were grade ≥3). Clinical strategies to manage these and other events, such as fatigue and insomnia, cognitive behavioral therapy and pharmacologic agents, are summarized. Once-daily niraparib dosing may be advantageous for some patients for many reasons, including night-time dosing which may help alleviate gastrointestinal symptoms. An individualized starting dose (determined by baseline body weight and platelet count) of niraparib demonstrated an improved safety profile while maintaining efficacy. Patients receiving the niraparib individualized starting dose had fewer grade ≥3 adverse events, dose interruptions, and dose reductions than patients receiving a fixed starting dose. The safety profile of niraparib across five pivotal studies in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer was consistent across multiple lines of treatment, including as maintenance therapy in first-line and recurrent settings and as treatment in heavily pre-treated patients. Long-term safety data from the NOVA trial confirmed that, with appropriate and early dose modifications, niraparib is well tolerated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bradley J Monk
- HonorHealth Research Institute, Phoenix, Arizona, USA .,University of Arizona College of Medicine, Phoenix, Arizona, USA
| | - Antonio González-Martin
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain.,Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA) and Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Ursula A Matulonis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Xiaohua Wu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Kathleen N Moore
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Stephenson Cancer Center at the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, USA
| | - Mansoor R Mirza
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gull N, Jones MR, Peng PC, Coetzee SG, Silva TC, Plummer JT, Reyes ALP, Davis BD, Chen SS, Lawrenson K, Lester J, Walsh C, Rimel BJ, Li AJ, Cass I, Berg Y, Govindavari JPB, Rutgers JKL, Berman BP, Karlan BY, Gayther SA. DNA methylation and transcriptomic features are preserved throughout disease recurrence and chemoresistance in high grade serous ovarian cancers. J Exp Clin Cancer Res 2022; 41:232. [PMID: 35883104 PMCID: PMC9327231 DOI: 10.1186/s13046-022-02440-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Little is known about the role of global DNA methylation in recurrence and chemoresistance of high grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC). Methods We performed whole genome bisulfite sequencing and transcriptome sequencing in 62 primary and recurrent tumors from 28 patients with stage III/IV HGSOC, of which 11 patients carried germline, pathogenic BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations. Results Landscapes of genome-wide methylation (on average 24.2 million CpGs per tumor) and transcriptomes in primary and recurrent tumors showed extensive heterogeneity between patients but were highly preserved in tumors from the same patient. We identified significant differences in the burden of differentially methylated regions (DMRs) in tumors from BRCA1/2 compared to non-BRCA1/2 carriers (mean 659 DMRs and 388 DMRs in paired comparisons respectively). We identified overexpression of immune pathways in BRCA1/2 carriers compared to non-carriers, implicating an increased immune response in improved survival (P = 0.006) in these BRCA1/2 carriers. Conclusion These findings indicate methylome and gene expression programs established in the primary tumor are conserved throughout disease progression, even after extensive chemotherapy treatment, and that changes in methylation and gene expression are unlikely to serve as drivers for chemoresistance in HGSOC. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13046-022-02440-z.
Collapse
|
12
|
Mirza MR, Lindahl G, Mahner S, Redondo A, Fabbro M, Rimel BJ, Herrstedt J, Oza AM, Canzler U, Berek JS, González-Martín A, Follana P, Lord R, Azodi M, Estenson K, Wang Z, Li Y, Gupta D, Matulonis U, Feng B. Ad hoc Analysis of the Phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA Study: Niraparib Efficacy in Germline BRCA Wild-type Recurrent Ovarian Cancer with Homologous Recombination Repair Defects. Cancer Research Communications 2022; 2:1436-1444. [PMID: 36970052 PMCID: PMC10035404 DOI: 10.1158/2767-9764.crc-22-0240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2022] [Revised: 10/24/2022] [Accepted: 10/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
In this analysis, we examined the relationship between progression-free survival (PFS) and mutation status of 18 homologous recombination repair (HRR) genes in patients in the non-germline BRCA-mutated (non-gBRCAm) cohort of the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial (NCT01847274), which evaluated niraparib maintenance therapy for patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. This post hoc exploratory biomarker analysis was performed using tumor samples collected from 331 patients enrolled in the phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial's non-gBRCAm cohort. Niraparib demonstrated PFS benefit in patients with either somatic BRCA-mutated (sBRCAm; HR, 0.27; 95% confidence interval, CI, 0.08–0.88) or BRCA wild-type (BRCAwt; HR, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.34–0.64) tumors. Patients with BRCAwt tumors with other non-BRCA HRR mutations also derived benefit from niraparib (HR, 0.31; 95% CI, 0.13–0.77), as did patients with BRCAwt/HRRwt (HRR wild-type) tumors (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.35–0.70). When patients with BRCAwt/HRRwt tumors were further categorized by genomic instability score (GIS), clinical benefit was observed in patients with homologous recombination–deficient (GIS ≥ 42; HR, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.18–0.61) and in patients with homologous recombination–proficient (HRp; GIS < 42; HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.36–0.99) disease. Although patients with sBRCAm, other non-BRCA HRR mutations, or GIS ≥ 42 benefited the most from niraparib treatment, PFS benefit was also seen in HRp (GIS < 42) patients without HRR mutations. These results support the use of niraparib in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer regardless of BRCA/HRR mutation status or myChoice CDx GIS.
Significance:
We retrospectively evaluated the mutational profile of HRR genes in tumor samples from 331 patients from the non-germline BRCA-mutated cohort of the phase III NOVA trial of patients with platinum-sensitive high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Patients with non-BRCA HRR mutations generally benefited from second-line maintenance treatment with niraparib compared with placebo.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NSGO) and Department of Oncology Rigshospitalet–Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Gabriel Lindahl
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology (NSGO) and Department of Oncology, Linköping University Hospital, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Sven Mahner
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe (AGO) and Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Andrés Redondo
- Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ, Madrid, Spain
| | - Michel Fabbro
- ICM Val d'Aurelle Parc Euromedecine, Oncologie Médicale, Montpellier, GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Bobbie J. Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Jørn Herrstedt
- Department of Clinical Oncology and Palliative Care Zealand University Hospital Roskilde and Næstved, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Amit M. Oza
- Division of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ulrich Canzler
- Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynaekologische Onkologie Studiengruppe (AGO) and Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Jonathan S. Berek
- Stanford University School of Medicine and Stanford Cancer Institute, Stanford, California
| | - Antonio González-Martín
- Medical Oncology Department, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Madrid, Program in Solid Tumors, Center for Applied Medical Research (CIMA), Pamplona, Spain, Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Rosemary Lord
- Medical Oncology, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust, Bebington, United Kingdom
| | - Masoud Azodi
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | | | | | | | | | - Ursula Matulonis
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Bin Feng
- GSK, Waltham, Massachusetts
- Corresponding Author: Bin Feng, Experimental Medicine Unit, GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA 02451. Phone: 339-234-8293; E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Rimel BJ, Kunos CA, Macioce N, Temkin SM. Current gaps and opportunities in screening, prevention, and treatment of cervical cancer. Cancer 2022; 128:4063-4073. [PMID: 36239009 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.34487] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 04/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Abstract
In their fiscal year 2021 reports, the US House and Senate Appropriations Committees requested that the National Institutes of Health (NIH) evaluate current research related to women's health and topics that include stagnant cervical cancer survival. In response, the NIH Office of Research on Women's Health, with input from women's health experts; members of the public; representatives from NIH institutes, centers, and offices; and members of the NIH Advisory Committee on Research on Women's Health, reviewed the public health needs and current NIH activities on cervical cancer. The Advancing NIH Research on the Health of Women: A 2021 Conference held in October 2021 reviewed these findings and allowed the identification of opportunities to strengthen research. In this review, the authors summarize public health needs related to cervical cancer and NIH activities in this realm. Cervical cancer has become a rare disease in the United States, yet significant portions of the US population remain under screened or unscreened for cervical cancer, human papillomavirus vaccination rates remain low, access to high-quality treatment remains a challenge for many, and large inequities by race and ethnicity persist. Novel, inclusive, and intentional research is needed to produce improvements in cervical cancer survival within the United States.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobbie J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Charles A Kunos
- Department of Radiation Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington, Kentucky, USA
| | - Nikeya Macioce
- Office of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah M Temkin
- Office of Research on Women's Health, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Brand J, Harro M, Abbasi F, Lin X, Siedhoff M, Andrew L, Rimel BJ, Medeiros F, Lawrenson K, Dinh HQ. Abstract 5148: Immune landscapes and interactions in human fallopian tubes and their implications for early high-grade serous ovarian cancers. Cancer Res 2022. [DOI: 10.1158/1538-7445.am2022-5148] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Abstract
The five-year survival rate of ovarian cancer (OC) dramatically rises from below 40% to 90% with patients who are diagnosed early (stage I), when the disease restricts to the ovary. Thus, the ultimate goals of our research are to learn how to detect ovarian cancer at its earliest stages of development and thereby improve patient survival and to learn how the immune microenvironment contributes to the development of OC. Achieving these goals requires us to better characterize the earliest steps in ovarian carcinogenesis. The human fallopian tube harbors the cell-of-origin for most high-grade serous 'ovarian' cancers (HGSOCs), but its cellular composition, particularly the immune component, is poorly characterized. Emerging evidence from several research groups using molecular sequencing technologies of fallopian tube epithelium strongly support this hypothesis. We recently described our use of single-cell transcriptome technology (scRNA-Seq) to profile the heterogeneity of non-malignant FT and define a novel transcriptional gene regulatory network of epithelial differentiation and tumorigenesis in the human FT. Here we present an in-depth characterization of the immune cell atlas for human fallopian tubes, which has not been reported. Our unpublished analyses of our FT dataset and the publicly available HGSOC scRNA-Seq dataset demonstrate a significant difference in the immune cell landscape. There are limited macrophages and a high abundance of monocytes in non-malignant FT and adjacent normal ovaries compared to those in HGSOC tumors. This finding leads us to hypothesize that the macrophage-to-monocyte ratio and their interactions with other immune cell types in human fallopian tubes create a permissive microenvironment allowing for the development of HGSOC and can provide a biomarker for early cancer detection. To test if those myeloid cells could be a marker for early HGSOC, we performed scRNA-seq on FT from women carrying mutant alleles of BRCA1 or BRCA2 who are at high risk of HGSOC. Intriguingly, the ratio of monocytes to macrophages in the FTs from half of these high-risk individuals is more like that found in HGSOC than in normal FT. Furthermore, computational analyses on myeloid cell types and their interactions with different epithelial cells, stromal fibroblast cells, and T and NK cells revealed the extended contribution of the non-epithelial microenvironment in FT, potentially driving early HGSOC development and progression. This cellular and molecular compendium of the human fallopian tube immune landscapes in cancer-free and cancer-high-risk women is expected to advance our understanding of the earliest stages of fallopian epithelial neoplasia.
Citation Format: Josh Brand, Marcela Harro, Forough Abbasi, Xianzhi Lin, Matthew Siedhoff, Li Andrew, Bobbie J. Rimel, Fabiola Medeiros, Kate Lawrenson, Huy Q. Dinh. Immune landscapes and interactions in human fallopian tubes and their implications for early high-grade serous ovarian cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5148.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Brand
- 1University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI
| | | | | | - Xianzhi Lin
- 2Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Li Andrew
- 2Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | - Huy Q. Dinh
- 1University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Mortlock S, Corona RI, Kho PF, Pharoah P, Seo JH, Freedman ML, Gayther SA, Siedhoff MT, Rogers PAW, Leuchter R, Walsh CS, Cass I, Karlan BY, Rimel BJ, Montgomery GW, Lawrenson K, Kar SP. A multi-level investigation of the genetic relationship between endometriosis and ovarian cancer histotypes. Cell Rep Med 2022; 3:100542. [PMID: 35492879 PMCID: PMC9040176 DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2022.100542] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2021] [Revised: 12/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Endometriosis is associated with increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancers (EOCs). Using data from large endometriosis and EOC genome-wide association meta-analyses, we estimate the genetic correlation and evaluate the causal relationship between genetic liability to endometriosis and EOC histotypes, and identify shared susceptibility loci. We estimate a significant genetic correlation (rg) between endometriosis and clear cell (rg = 0.71), endometrioid (rg = 0.48), and high-grade serous (rg = 0.19) ovarian cancer, associations supported by Mendelian randomization analyses. Bivariate meta-analysis identified 28 loci associated with both endometriosis and EOC, including 19 with evidence for a shared underlying association signal. Differences in the shared risk suggest different underlying pathways may contribute to the relationship between endometriosis and the different histotypes. Functional annotation using transcriptomic and epigenomic profiles of relevant tissues/cells highlights several target genes. This comprehensive analysis reveals profound genetic overlap between endometriosis and EOC histotypes with valuable genomic targets for understanding the biological mechanisms linking the diseases. Endometriosis is genetically correlated with CCOC, ENOC, and HGSOC Genetic liability to endometriosis confers risk of these EOC histotypes Profound colocalization of genetic associations at endometriosis and EOC risk loci Functional annotation highlights shared target genes elucidating the genetic link
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sally Mortlock
- The Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Rosario I Corona
- Women's Cancer Research Program at Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Pik Fang Kho
- Department of Genetics and Computational Biology, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,School of Biomedical Science, Faculty of Health, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Paul Pharoah
- Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health and Primary Care, University of Cambridge, CB1 8RN Cambridge, UK.,Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, CB1 8RN Cambridge, UK
| | - Ji-Heui Seo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Matthew L Freedman
- Department of Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Functional Cancer Epigenetics, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew T Siedhoff
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Peter A W Rogers
- University of Melbourne Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, and Gynaecology Research Centre, Royal Women's Hospital, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia
| | - Ronald Leuchter
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christine S Walsh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ilana Cass
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Grant W Montgomery
- The Institute for Molecular Bioscience, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, QLD 4072, Australia
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Women's Cancer Research Program at Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Siddhartha P Kar
- Medical Research Council Integrative Epidemiology Unit, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN Bristol, UK.,Population Health Sciences, Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, BS8 2BN Bristol, UK
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gay C, Raphael YR, Steers J, Lu DJ, Lewis JH, DeMarco J, Fraass B, Rimel BJ, Zakariaee R, Kamrava M, Atkins KM. Ovarian Transposition Before Pelvic Radiation Therapy: Spatial Distribution and Dose Volume Analysis. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 7:100804. [PMID: 35079662 PMCID: PMC8767263 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2021.100804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2021] [Accepted: 09/01/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Methods and Materials Results Conclusions
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Bobbie J. Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | | | | | - Katelyn M. Atkins
- Department of Radiation Oncology
- Corresponding author: Katelyn M. Atkins, MD, PhD
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
John CS, Fong A, Alban R, Gillen J, Moore KM, Walsh CS, Li AJ, Rimel BJ, Amersi F, Cass I. Breast cancer surveillance following ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. Gynecol Oncol 2021; 164:202-207. [PMID: 34862065 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2021.10.077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 10/13/2021] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES BRCA 1 or 2 mutation carriers have increased risk of developing breast cancer (BC) and serous epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC). The incidence of BC over time after EOC is unknown. Optimal BC surveillance for BRCA mutation carriers following EOC has not been defined. METHODS A multi-institutional retrospective chart review was performed. Patients with BRCA -associated EOC diagnosed between 1996 and 2016 were followed for an average of 80 months. Women with previous bilateral mastectomy were excluded; women with prior BC and an intact breast were included. Descriptive statistics, Chi Square, and univariate survival analysis were performed. RESULTS 184 patients with BRCA -associated EOC were identified. Eighteen (10%) were diagnosed with BC a median of 48 months following EOC. Two (1%) with prior BC developed contralateral BC and 16 (9%) developed primary BC. The majority of BC (55%) was diagnosed 3 years following EOC. The 3-, 5- and 10-year incidence of BC was 5.6%, 9.5% and 33.3%. Annual mammography was performed in 43% and MRI in 34%. Twenty-eight (15%) women underwent risk-reducing mastectomy (RRM). There was no statistically significant difference in BC screening between women with, and without, a prior BC. BC was most commonly detected on mammogram. Three (17%) women had occult BC at the time of RRM. Nine (50%) had DCIS, and 8 (44%) had stage I/II BC. Median 5- and 10-year survival was 68% and 43% and was comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS Ten percent of women developed BC after EOC. The incidence of BC following EOC in BRCA carriers increases over time, and surveillance is recommended given their enhanced survival of EOC. Timely genetic testing for women with EOC is imperative to better triage BC screening resources and treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine S John
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - Abigail Fong
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rodrigo Alban
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jessica Gillen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Kathleen M Moore
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Christine S Walsh
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Li
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Farin Amersi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ilana Cass
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Walsh CS, Kamrava M, Rogatko A, Kim S, Li A, Cass I, Karlan B, Rimel BJ. Phase II trial of cisplatin, gemcitabine and pembrolizumab for platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252665. [PMID: 34081738 PMCID: PMC8174738 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252665] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2020] [Accepted: 04/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the combination of pembrolizumab, cisplatin and gemcitabine in recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer. METHODS Patients received six cycles of chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin on day 1 and day 8 of a 21-day treatment cycle. Pembrolizumab was administered on day 1 of cycles 3-6 and as maintenance monotherapy in cycles 7-34. Palliative radiation to a non-target symptomatic lesion was allowed. The primary objective was overall response rate by RECIST 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included safety, progression-free survival, time to progression, duration of response and overall survival. RESULTS An interim analysis for futility was performed at 18 evaluable patients. Overall response rate was 60%, duration of response was 4.9 months and time to progression was 5.2 months. Progression-free survival at 6 and 12 months was 43% and 5%. Median progression-free survival was 6.2 months and median overall survival was 11.3 months. In all patients, CA125 levels reflected response and progression. There were no pseudoprogression events. After receiving palliative radiation during pembrolizumab maintenance, a patient with recurrent ovarian clear cell carcinoma had an exceptional and durable response that is ongoing for greater than 2 years. After consultation with the sponsor, based on the modest duration of response observed at the interim analysis for futility, the decision was made to close the trial to further accrual. CONCLUSIONS The addition of pembrolizumab to cisplatin and gemcitabine did not appear to provide benefit beyond chemotherapy alone in patients with recurrent platinum-resistant ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine S. Walsh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Mitchell Kamrava
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Andre Rogatko
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Sungjin Kim
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Biostatistics and Bioinformatics Research Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Andrew Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Ilana Cass
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Beth Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| | - Bobbie J. Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
- Cedars-Sinai Cancer, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Fuh KC, Herzog TJ, Moore KN, Myers TKN, Rimel BJ, Liu JF, Secord AA, Hamilton EP, Reid TJ, Lewin SN, Mullen MM, Mills KA, Anderson R, Rangwala RA. A phase 3, randomized, double-blind, adaptive, placebo/paclitaxel-controlled study of AVB-S6-500 in combination with paclitaxel in patients with platinum-resistant recurrent ovarian cancer (GOG-3059/ENGOT OV-66/AVB500-OC-004). J Clin Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2021.39.15_suppl.tps5605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS5605 Background: The AXL receptor and its activating ligand, GAS6, are important drivers of metastasis and therapeutic resistance in human cancers. This signaling axis represents an attractive target for therapeutic intervention, but the strong picomolar binding affinity between endogenous GAS6 and AXL and the promiscuity of small molecule AXL inhibitors have presented a barrier to specific and potent inhibition of AXL. AVB-S6-500 is a highly sensitive and specific inhibitor of AXL, with ̃200-fold higher affinity than wild-type (WT) AXL. AVB-S6-500 binds GAS6, the sole ligand of AXL, inhibiting its interaction with AXL thereby dramatically reducing AXL signaled invasion and migration of highly metastatic cells in vitro and inhibiting metastatic disease in nonclinical models of aggressive human cancers. A Phase 1b study in platinum resistant ovarian cancer showed no dose limiting toxicities and established a recommended Phase 2 dose of 15mg/kg administered every 2 weeks. Longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) times were observed in patients who had not been previously treated with bevacizumab. Furthermore, retrospective analyses demonstrated that serum soluble AXL to GAS6 ratio may identify patients more likely to respond to this therapy. Methods: Patients with high grade serous, platinum resistant ovarian cancer, who have received no more than 4 prior therapy regimens will be randomized 1:1 to AVB-500 + PAC or PAC + placebo. Patients will be stratified by recurrence after last platinum regimen (<3, 3-6 months), prior lines (1-2, 3-4), and prior bevacizumab (yes, no). The primary endpoint is PFS by RECIST v 1.1 as assessed by the investigator, with OS a key secondary endpoint. The study design is adaptive; with two interim analyses addressing conditional power in the bevacizumab treated subset, and in a serum soluble AXL, GAS6 biomarker subset, respectively, with interim results used to define the final target population. Simulations confirm a nominal one-sided type 1 error below 0.025, and show >90% statistical power for PFS under the following assumptions of PFS medians. Study recruitment began in Q1. Clinical trial information: NCT04729608.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Thomas J. Herzog
- University of Cincinnati, University of Cincinnati Cancer Institute, Cincinnati, OH
| | | | | | - BJ Rimel
- Cedar Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | - Erika P. Hamilton
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute and Tennessee Oncology, PLLC, Nashville, TN
| | | | | | - Mary M Mullen
- Washington University in St. Louis School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Dinh HQ, Lin X, Abbasi F, Nameki R, Haro M, Olingy CE, Chang H, Hernandez L, Gayther SA, Wright KN, Aspuria PJ, Karlan BY, Corona RI, Li A, Rimel BJ, Siedhoff MT, Medeiros F, Lawrenson K. Single-cell transcriptomics identifies gene expression networks driving differentiation and tumorigenesis in the human fallopian tube. Cell Rep 2021; 35:108978. [PMID: 33852846 PMCID: PMC10108902 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2021.108978] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2020] [Revised: 09/30/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The human fallopian tube harbors the cell of origin for the majority of high-grade serous "ovarian" cancers (HGSCs), but its cellular composition, particularly the epithelial component, is poorly characterized. We perform single-cell transcriptomic profiling of around 53,000 individual cells from 12 primary fallopian specimens to map their major cell types. We identify 10 epithelial subpopulations with diverse transcriptional programs. Based on transcriptional signatures, we reconstruct a trajectory whereby secretory cells differentiate into ciliated cells via a RUNX3high intermediate. Computational deconvolution of advanced HGSCs identifies the "early secretory" population as a likely precursor state for the majority of HGSCs. Its signature comprises both epithelial and mesenchymal features and is enriched in mesenchymal-type HGSCs (p = 6.7 × 10-27), a group known to have particularly poor prognoses. This cellular and molecular compendium of the human fallopian tube in cancer-free women is expected to advance our understanding of the earliest stages of fallopian epithelial neoplasia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huy Q Dinh
- Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Xianzhi Lin
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Forough Abbasi
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Robbin Nameki
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Marcela Haro
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Claire E Olingy
- Center for Cancer Immunotherapy, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Heidi Chang
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lourdes Hernandez
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kelly N Wright
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Paul-Joseph Aspuria
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rosario I Corona
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew Li
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Matthew T Siedhoff
- Division of Minimally Invasive Gynecologic Surgery, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Fabiola Medeiros
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Kate Lawrenson
- Women's Cancer Research Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA; Center for Bioinformatics and Functional Genomics, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Taylor KN, Li AJ, Rimel BJ, Walsh C, Plaxe SC. Socioeconomic factors do not impact survival in serous borderline ovarian tumors and low grade serous ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
22
|
John C, Cass I, Walsh C, Rimel BJ, Taylor KN, Li AJ. Obesity is associated with poor clinical outcome in BRCA mutation carriers with epithelial ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.07.069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
23
|
Fong A, Cass I, John C, Gillen J, Moore KM, Gangi A, Walsh C, Li AJ, Rimel BJ, Karlan BY, Amersi F. Breast Cancer Surveillance Following Ovarian Cancer in BRCA Mutation Carriers. Am Surg 2020; 86:1243-1247. [DOI: 10.1177/0003134820964208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BRCA1 or 2 mutations result in higher cancer risk for breast cancer (BC) and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) for carriers than exists in the general population. Optimal breast imaging surveillance in these patients has not been well defined. An Institutional Review Board-approved, multi-institutional retrospective chart review was performed. Patients diagnosed with BRCA-associated EOC between 1990-2015 were identified; demographic and clinical data were collected and analyzed. 192 BRCA mutation–positive patients with EOC were identified. 16/192 (8.3%) women were diagnosed with BC following EOC, at a median of 50 (range 5-327) months following EOC diagnosis and median age 59.5 (45-84) years. Breast cancer was most commonly detected on mammogram 7/16 (44%) or clinical exam 7/16 (44%). 2/16 (12.5%) had occult BC found during risk-reducing mastectomy. 14 (88%) had early-stage (0-2) disease. At mean follow-up of 8.1 years, 6 (37.5%) patients with BC following EOC had died due to EOC. The risk of BC diagnosis following EOC in BRCA mutation carriers is low; most of these BCs are early stage and diagnosed with mammography or physical exam. Overall, survival in BRCA mutation carriers is dominated by EOC-related mortality. Breast cancer surveillance in BRCA mutation carriers following EOC should prioritize nonsurgical strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail Fong
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ilana Cass
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Andrew J. Li
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Farin Amersi
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Miller TM, Lester J, Kwan L, Tandel MD, Karlan BY, Rimel BJ. 21 Code of Federal Regulations Part 11-Compliant Digital Signature Solution for Cancer Clinical Trials: A Single-Institution Feasibility Study. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2020; 4:854-864. [PMID: 32970483 DOI: 10.1200/cci.20.00027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Inefficiencies in the clinical trial infrastructure result in protracted trial completion timelines, physician-investigator turnover, and a shrinking skilled labor force and present obstacles to research participation. Taken together, these barriers hinder scientific progress. Technological solutions to improve clinical trial efficiency have emerged, yet adoption remains slow because of concerns with cost, regulatory compliance, and implementation. METHODS A prospective pilot study that compared regulatory-compliant digital and traditional wet ink paper signatures was conducted over a 6.5-month period in a hospital-based health system. Staff time and effort, error rate, costs, and time to completion were measured. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to compare staff time and time to completion. A value analysis was conducted. A survey was administered to measure user satisfaction. RESULTS There where 96 participants (47 digital, 49 paper), 132 studies included (31 digital, 101 paper), and 265 documents processed (156 digital, 109 paper). A moderate reduction in staff time required to prepare documents for signature was observed (P < .0001). Error rates were reported in 5.1% of digital and 2.8% of paper documents, but this difference was not significant. Discrepancies requiring revisions included incomplete mandatory fields, inaccurate information submitted, and technical issues. A value analysis demonstrated a 19% labor savings with the use of digital signatures. Survey response rate was 57.4% (n = 27). Most participants (85.2%) preferred digital signatures. The time to complete documents was faster with digital signatures compared with paper (P = .0241). CONCLUSION The use of digital signatures resulted in a decrease in document completion time and regulatory burden as represented by staff hours. Additional cost and time savings and information liquidity could be realized by integrating digital signatures and electronic document management systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jenny Lester
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Lorna Kwan
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Megha D Tandel
- Department of Urology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA
| | - B J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Mirza MR, Benigno B, Dørum A, Mahner S, Bessette P, Barceló IB, Berton-Rigaud D, Ledermann JA, Rimel BJ, Herrstedt J, Lau S, du Bois A, Herráez AC, Kalbacher E, Buscema J, Lorusso D, Vergote I, Levy T, Wang P, de Jong FA, Gupta D, Matulonis UA. Long-term safety in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer treated with niraparib versus placebo: Results from the phase III ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. Gynecol Oncol 2020; 159:442-448. [PMID: 32981695 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2020.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor approved for use in heavily pretreated patients and as maintenance treatment in patients with newly-diagnosed or recurrent ovarian cancer following a response to platinum-based chemotherapy. We present long-term safety data for niraparib from the ENGOT-OV16/NOVA trial. METHODS This multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled phase III trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of niraparib for the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer. Patients were randomly assigned 2:1 to receive either once-daily niraparib 300 mg or placebo. Two independent cohorts were enrolled based on germline BRCA mutation status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival, reported previously. Long-term safety data were from the most recent data cutoff (September 2017). RESULTS Overall, 367 patients received niraparib 300 mg once daily. Dose reductions due to TEAEs were highest in month 1 (34%) and declined every month thereafter. Incidence of any-grade and grade ≥ 3 hematologic and symptomatic TEAEs was also highest in month 1 and subsequently declined. Incidence of grade ≥ 3 thrombocytopenia decreased from 28% (month 1) to 9% and 5% (months 2 and 3, respectively), with protocol-directed dose interruptions and/or reductions. Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) were reported in 2 and 6 niraparib-treated patients, respectively, and in 1 placebo patient each. Treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs were <5% in each month and time interval measured. CONCLUSION These data demonstrate the importance of appropriate dose reduction according to toxicity criteria and support the safe long-term use of niraparib for maintenance treatment in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01847274.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoor R Mirza
- Nordic Society of Gynaecological Oncology Clinical Trial Unit (NSGO-CTU), Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - B Benigno
- Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - A Dørum
- Radiumhospitalet, Oslo University Hospital, NSGO, Oslo, Norway
| | - S Mahner
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, AGO, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bessette
- Sherbrooke University, Sherbrooke, QC, Canada
| | | | - D Berton-Rigaud
- Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest Centre René Gauducheau, GINECO, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - J A Ledermann
- UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, NCRI, London, UK
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood, CA, USA
| | - J Herrstedt
- Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark; Zealand University Hospital, NSGO, Roskilde, Denmark
| | - S Lau
- McGill University, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - A du Bois
- Kliniken Essen Mitte, AGO, Essen, Germany
| | | | - E Kalbacher
- Centre Hospitalier Régional et Universitaire de Besançon, GINECO, Besançon, France
| | - J Buscema
- Arizona Oncology Associates, Tucson, AZ, USA
| | - D Lorusso
- Fondazione Policlinico Universitario a Gemelli IRCCS, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, MITO, Milan, Italy
| | - I Vergote
- University of Leuven, Leuven Cancer Institute, BGOG, Leuven, Belgium
| | - T Levy
- Wolfson Medical Center, ISGO, Holon, Israel
| | - P Wang
- GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | | - D Gupta
- GlaxoSmithKline, Waltham, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
26
|
Rimel BJ, Dockery L, Randall LM, Moore K. Niraparib in the treatment of previously treated advanced ovarian, fallopian tube or primary peritoneal cancer. Future Oncol 2020; 16:2701-2711. [PMID: 32880196 DOI: 10.2217/fon-2020-0538] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Homologous recombination deficiency is a critical biologic feature of ovarian cancer. This weakness in DNA damage repair relies on functional poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase. Niraparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor, orally available and initially approved for maintenance therapy in women with ovarian cancer by the US FDA in 2017 and by the EMA in 2017 for the same indication. Ovarian cancer represents the most lethal of gynecologic malignancies. The efficacy of niraparib has changed the landscape of ovarian cancer treatment, but overall survival data is still to come. This review summarizes the data regarding niraparib mechanism of action, toxicities, single agent efficacy and novel combinations in ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Los Angeles, CA 90048, USA
| | - Lauren Dockery
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| | - Leslie M Randall
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23298, USA
| | - Kathleen Moore
- The Stephenson Cancer Center, The University of Oklahoma, Oklahoma City, OK 73104, USA
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Hardy-Bessard AC, Moore KN, Mirza MR, Asselain B, Redondo A, Pfisterer J, Pignata S, Provencher DM, Cibula D, Reyners AK, Bodnar L, Glasspool R, Papadimitriou C, Eitan R, Han SN, Duska LR, Rimel BJ, Divya G, Chen J, Pujade-Lauraine E. ENGOT-OV44/FIRST study: a randomized, double-blind, adaptive, phase III study of standard of care (SOC) platinum-based therapy ± dostarlimab followed by niraparib ± dostarlimab maintenance as first-line (1L) treatment of stage 3 or 4 ovarian cancer (OC). J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.tps6101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS6101 Background: Despite surgery and CT (paclitaxel + carboplatin ± bevacizumab [bev]), 5-year survival rates remain low for patients (pts) with FIGO stage 3 or 4 OC. Niraparib is a poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitor that has recently demonstrated efficacy in 1L therapy. Dostarlimab (TSR-042) is an anti-programmed death (PD)-1 humanized monoclonal antibody that has shown clinical activity as monotherapy in early phase trials. The currently enrolling ENGOT-OV44/FIRST study will compare efficacy and safety of CT + dostarlimab + niraparib ± bev (Arm 3) vs CT + niraparib ± bev (Arm 2). Methods: Eligible pts are ≥18 years of age, with FIGO stage 3 or 4 non-mucinous epithelial OC, ECOG performance status < 2, and tumor tissue available for PD-1 ligand (PD-L1) testing. After cycle 1 of CT, pts are stratified by concurrent bev use, BRCA mutation/homologous recombination repair status, and disease burden, then randomized 1:2 into trial Arms 2 and 3 (Table). Dostarlimab is administered at 500 mg IV Q3W during the CT period, then 1000 mg IV Q6W during the maintenance period. Niraparib dosing is 200 mg PO QD for pts with baseline bodyweight (BW) < 77 kg and/or platelet count (PC) < 150,000/µL, or 300 mg QD for pts with baseline BW ≥77 kg and PC ≥150,000/µL. The dual primary endpoints are PFS, based on investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1, in both PD-L1+ and all patients. Initially the study enrolled pts to Arm 1. This arm was discontinued following positive results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 and PAOLA-1/ENGOT-OV25 studies. This allows investigators to offer the current standard of care to all patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03602859, EUDRACT 2018-000413-20. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Claire Hardy-Bessard
- Medical Oncology Department, CARIO-HPCA and Cooperative Gynecological Cancer Research Group (GINECO), Plerin, France
| | - Kathleen N. Moore
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center and Sarah Cannon Research Institute (Nashville, TN), Oklahoma City, OK
| | - Mansoor Raza Mirza
- Nordic Society of Gynecologic Oncology (NSGO) and Rigshospitalet University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Bernard Asselain
- Department of Biostatistics, Institut Curie and GINECO, Paris, France
| | - Andres Redondo
- Hospital Universitario La Paz-IdiPAZ and Spanish Ovarian Cancer Research Group (GEICO), Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Sandro Pignata
- MITO - Italy, Department of Urology and Gynecology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCSS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | | | - David Cibula
- CEECOG, Gynecologic Oncology Center-Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology-General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | | | | | - Rosalind Glasspool
- SGCTG/NCRI-UK, Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rami Eitan
- ISGO-Israel, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv University, Petah Tikva, Israel
| | | | | | - BJ Rimel
- Cedar Sinai Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Temkin SM, Rubinsak L, Benoit MF, Chandavarkar U, Hong L, Berry LK, Heisler CA, Rimel BJ, McGuire WP. Gynecologic oncology, gender and relevant leadership in academic medicine. J Clin Oncol 2020. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2020.38.15_suppl.e19056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
e19056 Background: Within academic medicine, there has been increasing attention to diversity and inclusion. We sought to characterize gynecologic oncologist (GO) faculty inclusion, with attention to gender in relevant academic leadership roles. Methods: Using the American Association of Medical Colleges list of accredited schools of medicine academic institutions were identified. Observational data was obtained through institutional websites in 2019. Results: Of 154 accredited medical schools, 144 contain a department of obstetrics and gynecology (OBG) with a chair; 103 a GO division with a director; 98 a clinical cancer center with a director. GO divisions included an average of 3.1 faculty. 55% of GO faculty were women, compared to 66% of OBG faculty (p < 0.01). 38% of the GO division directors were women which was an under-representation (p < 0.01). GOs made up 10% of OBG faculty and 15.4% of OBG chairs (NS). Women GOs made up 7.9% of women OBG faculty and 8 (5.6%) women GOs were OBG chairs (NS). 9.9% of GO faculty (11.6% of women GO faculty) report to women GOs at the chair level. OBG departments with a GO chair were more likely to have a woman GO division director (68.4 vs 31.7%, p < 0.01), and GO fellowship (59.1 vs 32%, p < 0.01). The majority (59%) of cancer centers directors were medical oncologists (see Table). 2 (2%) of cancer center directors were GOs; 1 at an NCI designated cancer center. Neither GO directors were women. Incidence to leadership and mortality to leadership ratios were calculated compared to expected rates by SEER 2019. By these measures GOs were underrepresented in cancer center leadership (p < 0.01, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Despite representative leadership of GO and women GO within in OBG leadership, most GOs report to non-oncologists at the department chair level. Potential benefits of GO leadership within OBG departments were identified. The practice of gynecologic oncology includes complex medical and surgical cancer care making these physicians uniquely qualified for cancer center, but representation of GOs in cancer center leadership is low and women GO were absent from cancer center director positions. Without inclusion of GO in cancer center leadership, existing inequities in clinical care, research and funding for gynecologic malignancies may be amplified. [Table: see text]
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Lisa Rubinsak
- Manos Cancer Institute/Wayne State University, Detroit, MI
| | | | | | - Linda Hong
- Loma Linda University School of Medicine, Loma Linda, CA
| | | | | | - BJ Rimel
- Cedar Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Listing more than one option for treatment, termed "option-listing" (OL) is one way to facilitate shared decision-making. We seek to evaluate how oncologists do option-listing in clinical encounters across disease contexts. METHOD We coded and transcribed 90 video-recorded interactions between 5 oncologist participants and a convenience sample of 82 patients at 2 large clinics in the western U.S. We used conversation analytic (CA) methods to examine patterns of behavior when oncologists provided more than one treatment option to patients. RESULTS In early-stage disease, OL provides patients with options while at the same time constraining those options through expression of physician bias. This effect disappears when cancer is at an advanced stage. In this context, OL is presented without physician preference and demonstrates recission of medical authority. CONCLUSION In early-stage contexts, OL functions as a way for physicians to array available options to patients while also communicating their expertise. In advanced-stage contexts, OL functions as a way to minimize treatment options and highlight dwindling possibilities. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS OL is one way to implement shared decision-making, but it can also be used to facilitate a realization that treatment choices are diminishing and disease is progressing beyond a cure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Tate
- Department of Medicine, The University of Chicago, United States.
| | - B J Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, United States
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Matsuo K, Cripe JC, Kurnit KC, Kaneda M, Garneau AS, Glaser GE, Nizam A, Schillinger RM, Kuznicki ML, Yabuno A, Yanai S, Garofalo DM, Suzuki J, St Laurent JD, Yen TT, Liu AY, Shida M, Kakuda M, Oishi T, Nishio S, Marcus JZ, Adachi S, Kurokawa T, Ross MS, Horowitz MP, Johnson MS, Kim MK, Melamed A, Machado KK, Yoshihara K, Yoshida Y, Enomoto T, Ushijima K, Satoh S, Ueda Y, Mikami M, Rimel BJ, Stone RL, Growdon WB, Okamoto A, Guntupalli SR, Hasegawa K, Shahzad MMK, Im DD, Frimer M, Gostout BS, Ueland FR, Nagao S, Soliman PT, Thaker PH, Wright JD, Roman LD. Recurrence, death, and secondary malignancy after ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2019; 155:39-50. [PMID: 31427143 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2019.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Revised: 07/29/2019] [Accepted: 08/03/2019] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To examine the association between ovarian conservation and oncologic outcome in surgically-treated young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer. METHODS This multicenter retrospective study examined women aged <50 with stage I grade 1-2 endometrioid endometrial cancer who underwent primary surgery with hysterectomy from 2000 to 2014 (US cohort n = 1196, and Japan cohort n = 495). Recurrence patterns, survival, and the presence of a metachronous secondary malignancy were assessed based on ovarian conservation versus oophorectomy. RESULTS During the study period, the ovarian conservation rate significantly increased in the US cohort from 5.4% to 16.4% (P = 0.020) whereas the rate was unchanged in the Japan cohort (6.3-8.7%, P = 0.787). In the US cohort, ovarian conservation was not associated with disease-free survival (hazard ratio [HR] 0.829, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.188-3.663, P = 0.805), overall survival (HR not estimated, P = 0.981), or metachronous secondary malignancy (HR 1.787, 95% CI 0.603-5.295, P = 0.295). In the Japan cohort, ovarian conservation was associated with decreased disease-free survival (HR 5.214, 95% CI 1.557-17.464, P = 0.007) and an increased risk of a metachronous secondary malignancy, particularly ovarian cancer (HR 7.119, 95% CI 1.349-37.554, P = 0.021), but was not associated with overall survival (HR not estimated, P = 0.987). Ovarian recurrence or metachronous secondary ovarian cancer occurred after a median time of 5.9 years, and all cases were salvaged. CONCLUSION Our study suggests that adoption of ovarian conservation in young women with early-stage low-grade endometrial cancer varies by population. Ovarian conservation for young women with early-stage, low-grade endometrial cancer may be potentially associated with increased risks of ovarian recurrence or metachronous secondary ovarian cancer in certain populations; nevertheless, ovarian conservation did not negatively impact overall survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
| | - James C Cripe
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Katherine C Kurnit
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD-Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Michiko Kaneda
- Department of Gynecology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Audrey S Garneau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Gretchen E Glaser
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Aaron Nizam
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Long Island, NY, USA
| | | | - Michelle L Kuznicki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Akira Yabuno
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Shiori Yanai
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurashiki Medical Center, Okayama, Japan
| | - Denise M Garofalo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Jiro Suzuki
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Jessica D St Laurent
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Ting-Tai Yen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Annie Y Liu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Masako Shida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Mamoru Kakuda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tetsuro Oishi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Tottori, Japan
| | - Shin Nishio
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Jenna Z Marcus
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Sosuke Adachi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tetsuji Kurokawa
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui School of Medicine, Fukui, Japan
| | - Malcolm S Ross
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Max P Horowitz
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Marian S Johnson
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Min K Kim
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Karime K Machado
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Kosuke Yoshihara
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan
| | - Yoshio Yoshida
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Fukui School of Medicine, Fukui, Japan
| | - Takayuki Enomoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Niigata University School of Medicine, Niigata, Japan
| | - Kimio Ushijima
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Kurume University School of Medicine, Fukuoka, Japan
| | - Shinya Satoh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tottori University School of Medicine, Tottori, Japan
| | - Yutaka Ueda
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Osaka, Japan
| | - Mikio Mikami
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tokai University School of Medicine, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Bobbie J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Rebecca L Stone
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Johns Hopkins Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Whitfield B Growdon
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Aikou Okamoto
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Saketh R Guntupalli
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Kosei Hasegawa
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Saitama Medical University International Medical Center, Saitama, Japan
| | - Mian M K Shahzad
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Moffitt Cancer Center, University of South Florida, FL, USA
| | - Dwight D Im
- Gynecologic Oncology Center, Mercy Medical Center, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Marina Frimer
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Northwell Health, Long Island, NY, USA
| | - Bobbie S Gostout
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Frederick R Ueland
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA
| | - Shoji Nagao
- Department of Gynecology, Hyogo Cancer Center, Hyogo, Japan
| | - Pamela T Soliman
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, MD-Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Premal H Thaker
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Gresham G, Hendifar AE, Gong J, Asher A, Walsh CS, Rimel BJ, Posadas EM, Diniz M, Herring M, Woubeshet B, Baynes R, Figlin RA, Spiegel B, Freedland SJ. Digitally captured step counts for evaluating performance status in advanced cancer patients: A single cohort, prospective trial (Digi-STEPS). J Clin Oncol 2019. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2019.37.15_suppl.tps6651] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
TPS6651 Background: Advanced cancer patients undergo dynamic changes in their functionality and physical activity over the course of their treatment. Monitoring patient function is important because it can inform treatment decisions and allow for timely and appropriate intervention. Current scales that assess patient function, such as the ECOG Performance Status (PS), are limited in their ability to capture the wide range in activity that cancer patients can experience on a daily basis outside of the clinic setting. Given recent technological advances in wearable activity monitors, we can collect real-time, objective information about a patient’s daily activity including steps, stairs, heart rate, sleep, and activity intensity. Thus, the primary objective of this study is to determine whether longitudinal changes in objectively-assessed activity are associated with change in physician-rated ECOG PS. Methods: This is a prospective, single cohort trial being conducted at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center. Stage 3/4 cancer patients who are English or Spanish-speaking, ambulatory (assistive walking devices are allowed) and expected to be seen for treatment or follow-up with their oncologist at least every 8 weeks are eligible for study. Consenting patients will be asked to wear a Fitbit Charge HR continuously for 8 weeks during the study period and for one week prior to the 6 month and 1 year follow-up visits. Primary outcomes are change in average daily step counts and ECOG PS at 8 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes include: 1) Change in NIH PROMIS patient-reported outcomes (physical function, pain, sleep, emotional distress, and fatigue), 2) Change in frailty status at 8 weeks, 3) Occurrence of adverse events, and 4) 6-month and 1-year survival outcomes. Baseline assessments include a physical exam, medical history, and frailty assessment. The attending oncologist will rate the patient's ECOG PS at baseline and at the end-of-study visit. Weekly NIH PROMIS questionnaires will be administered online over the 8-week study and again at 6 months and 1 year follow-up. The occurrence of serious cancer-related adverse events, chemotherapy-associated toxicities, and hospitalizations will be documented up to 12 weeks from baseline. Survival will be assessed at 6 months and 1 year. Accrual is ongoing with 20 patients currently enrolled of a target sample size of 60 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03757182.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andrew Eugene Hendifar
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - Arash Asher
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - BJ Rimel
- Cedar Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Edwin M. Posadas
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | | | | | | - Robert A. Figlin
- Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Moore KN, Secord AA, Geller MA, Miller DS, Cloven N, Fleming GF, Wahner Hendrickson AE, Azodi M, DiSilvestro P, Oza AM, Cristea M, Berek JS, Chan JK, Rimel BJ, Matei DE, Li Y, Sun K, Luptakova K, Matulonis UA, Monk BJ. Niraparib monotherapy for late-line treatment of ovarian cancer (QUADRA): a multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol 2019; 20:636-648. [DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(19)30029-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 198] [Impact Index Per Article: 39.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2018] [Revised: 12/17/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
|
33
|
Liu JF, Barry WT, Birrer M, Lee JM, Buckanovich RJ, Fleming GF, Rimel BJ, Buss MK, Nattam SR, Hurteau J, Luo W, Curtis J, Whalen C, Kohn EC, Ivy SP, Matulonis UA. Overall survival and updated progression-free survival outcomes in a randomized phase II study of combination cediranib and olaparib versus olaparib in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:551-557. [PMID: 30753272 PMCID: PMC6503628 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 122] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Olaparib is a poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor and cediranib is an oral anti-angiogenic. In the primary analysis of this phase II study, combination cediranib/olaparib improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. This updated analysis was conducted to characterize overall survival (OS) and update PFS outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS Ninety patients were enrolled to this randomized, open-label, phase II study between October 2011 and June 2013 across nine United States-based academic centers. Data cut-off was 21 December 2016, with a median follow-up of 46 months. Participants had relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer of high-grade serous or endometrioid histology or had a deleterious germline BRCA1/2 mutation (gBRCAm). Participants were randomized to receive olaparib capsules 400 mg twice daily or cediranib 30 mg daily and olaparib capsules 200 mg twice daily until disease progression. RESULTS In this updated analysis, median PFS remained significantly longer with cediranib/olaparib compared with olaparib alone (16.5 versus 8.2 months, hazard ratio 0.50; P = 0.007). Subset analyses within stratum defined by BRCA status demonstrated statistically significant improvement in PFS (23.7 versus 5.7 months, P = 0.002) and OS (37.8 versus 23.0 months, P = 0.047) in gBRCA wild-type/unknown patients, although OS was not statistically different in the overall study population (44.2 versus 33.3 months, hazard ratio 0.64; P = 0.11). PFS and OS appeared similar between the two arms in gBRCAm patients. The most common CTCAE grade 3/4 adverse events with cediranib/olaparib remained fatigue, diarrhea, and hypertension. CONCLUSIONS Combination cediranib/olaparib significantly extends PFS compared with olaparib alone in relapsed platinum-sensitive ovarian cancer. Subset analyses suggest this margin of benefit is driven by PFS prolongation in patients without gBRCAm. OS was also significantly increased by the cediranib/olaparib combination in this subset of patients. Additional studies of this combination are ongoing and should incorporate analyses based upon BRCA status. TRIAL REGISTRATION Clinicaltrials.gov Identifier NCT0111648.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J F Liu
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology.
| | - W T Barry
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - M Birrer
- Department of Medical Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston
| | - J-M Lee
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda
| | - R J Buckanovich
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Pittsburgh Hillman Cancer Center, Pittsburgh
| | - G F Fleming
- Section of Hematology/Oncology, University of Chicago, Chicago
| | - B J Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles
| | - M K Buss
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Beth-Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston
| | - S R Nattam
- Department of Oncology, Fort Wayne Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fort Wayne
| | - J Hurteau
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, NorthShore University HealthSystem, Evanston Hospital, Evanston
| | - W Luo
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston
| | - J Curtis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology
| | - C Whalen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology
| | - E C Kohn
- Women's Malignancies Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda; Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - S P Ivy
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, USA
| | - U A Matulonis
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Medical Oncology
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Aryal NK, Pant V, Wasylishen AR, Rimel BJ, Baseler L, El-Naggar AK, Mutch DG, Goodfellow PJ, Arur S, Lozano G. Dicer1 Phosphomimetic Promotes Tumor Progression and Dissemination. Cancer Res 2019; 79:2662-2668. [PMID: 30914430 DOI: 10.1158/0008-5472.can-18-2460] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2018] [Revised: 10/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Dicer1 functions as a tumor suppressor in mouse models. In humans, somatic mutations are associated with many cancers in adults, and patients with DICER1 syndrome with DICER1 germline mutations are susceptible to childhood cancers. Dicer is phosphorylated by the ERK-MAP kinase pathway and because this pathway is activated in human cancers, we asked whether phosphorylated Dicer1 contributed to tumor development. In human endometrioid cancers, we discovered that phosphorylated DICER1 is significantly associated with invasive disease. To test a direct involvement of Dicer1 phosphorylation in tumor development, we studied mice with phosphomimetic alterations at the two conserved serines phosphorylated by ERK and discovered that a phosphomimetic Dicer1 drives tumor development and dissemination in two independent murine cancer models (KRas+/LA1 and p53+/- ). Our findings demonstrate that phosphomimetic Dicer1 promotes tumor development and invasion. SIGNIFICANCE: This work highlights the relevance of Dicer1 phosphorylation in mammalian tumor development and dissemination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Neeraj K Aryal
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.,Genes and Development Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Vinod Pant
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Amanda R Wasylishen
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Bobbie J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Laura Baseler
- Department of Veterinary Medicine and Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Adel K El-Naggar
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - David G Mutch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine and Siteman Cancer Center, St. Louis, Missouri
| | - Paul J Goodfellow
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, The Ohio State University and James Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Swathi Arur
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. .,Genes and Development Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| | - Guillermina Lozano
- Department of Genetics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. .,Genes and Development Program, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center UTHealth Graduate School of Biomedical Sciences, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Chang H, Rimel BJ, Li AJ, Cass I, Karlan BY, Walsh C. Ultrasound guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block utilization in multimodal pain management after open gynecologic surgery. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2018; 26:75-77. [PMID: 30364775 PMCID: PMC6197766 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2018.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/28/2018] [Revised: 10/11/2018] [Accepted: 10/14/2018] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is a peripheral nerve block directed at the nerves in the anterior abdominal wall. We sought to determine whether TAP block reduces post-operative narcotic use or length of stay after open gynecologic surgery. Among 98 women who underwent an open hysterectomy between July 2016 - July 2017 by a gynecologic oncologist, 73 (74.5%) received a TAP block. The majority of patients who received a TAP block had a vertical incision (86.3%) while the majority of patients who did not receive TAP block had a transverse incision (64%). More patients in the TAP block group underwent cancer debulking compared to the no TAP block group (65.7% versus 8%). The two groups did not differ in post-operative pain scores on day 1, 2, or 3, cumulative narcotic use by post-operative day 3, length of stay, or ileus. We found TAP block after vertical skin incision results in comparable pain scores, narcotic use, and length of stay compared to patients undergoing transverse incisions without TAP block.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Chang
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - B J Rimel
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Andrew J Li
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Ilana Cass
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| | - Christine Walsh
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd, Los Angeles, CA 90048, United States
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Temkin SM, Rimel BJ, Bruegl AS, Gunderson CC, Beavis AL, Doll KM. A contemporary framework of health equity applied to gynecologic cancer care: A Society of Gynecologic Oncology evidenced-based review. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:70-77. [PMID: 29605053 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.11.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2017] [Revised: 10/19/2017] [Accepted: 11/07/2017] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Abstract
Health disparities are defined as the preventable difference in the burden of disease, injury, and violence, or opportunity to achieve optimal health that socially disadvantaged populations experience compared to the population as a whole. Disparities in incidence and cancer outcomes for women with gynecologic malignancies have been well described particularly for American women of Black race. The etiology of these disparities has been tied to socio-economics, cultural, educational and genetic factors. While access to high quality treatment has been primarily linked to survival from cervical and ovarian cancer, innate biologic distinctions have been principally cited as reasons for differences in incidence and mortality in cancers of the uterine corpus. This article will update the framework of disparities to incorporate a broader understanding of the social determinants of health and how they affect health equity by addressing the root causes of disparities within the health care system. Special populations are identified who are at risk for health inequities which include but are not limited to Black race, underserved racial and ethnic minorities (e.g. indigenous peoples, low English fluency), trans/gender nonconforming people and rural populations. Each of these populations at risk have unique structural barriers within the healthcare system impacting gynecologic cancer outcomes. The authors provide practical recommendations for practitioners aimed at eliminating cancer related outcome disparities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah M Temkin
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Massey Cancer Center, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | | | - Camille C Gunderson
- Stephenson Cancer Center, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma city, OK, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Matsuo K, Machida H, Blake EA, Holman LL, Rimel BJ, Roman LD, Wright JD. Trends and outcomes of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer. Oncotarget 2018; 9:28757-28771. [PMID: 29983894 PMCID: PMC6033337 DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.25550] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2017] [Accepted: 05/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
This retrospective observational study examined trends, characteristics, and survival of women with synchronous endometrial and ovarian cancer (SEOC) in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program between 1973 and 2013. Among 235,454 women with primary endometrial cancer, synchronous ovarian cancer was seen in 4,082 (1.7%) women with the proportion being decreased from 2.0% to 1.6% between 1983 and 2013 (P=0.049); and the proportion of concurrent endometrioid tumors in the two cancer sites has increased from 24.2% to 49.9% among SEOC women (P<0.001). When compared to endometrial cancer without synchronous ovarian cancer, endometrioid histology in the two cancer sites was associated with improved cause-specific survival while non-endometrioid histology in the ovarian cancer was associated with decreased cause-specific survival (adjusted-P<0.01). Among 110,063 women with primary epithelial ovarian cancer, synchronous endometrial cancer was seen in 3,940 (3.6%) women with the proportion being increased from 2.2% to 4.4% between 1973 and 2013 (P<0.001); and the proportion of concurrent endometrioid tumors in the two cancer sites had increased from 24.3% to 50.2% among SEOC women (P<0.001). When compared to primary epithelial ovarian cancer without synchronous endometrial cancer, SEOC was associated with better cause-specific survival if ovarian cancer is endometrioid type or if endometrial cancer is endometrioid type (adjusted-P<0.001). Across the two cohorts, the proportion of SEOC reached to the peak in the late-40 years of age and then decreased significantly (P<0.001). In conclusion, our study suggests that synchronous ovarian cancer has decreased among endometrial cancer whereas synchronous endometrial cancer has increased among epithelial ovarian cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Hiroko Machida
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Erin A Blake
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Laura L Holman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK, USA
| | - Bobbie J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Lynda D Roman
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Jason D Wright
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Wield AM, Walsh CS, Rimel BJ, Cass I, Karlan BY, Li AJ. Aspirin use correlates with survival in women with clear cell ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol Rep 2018; 25:78-81. [PMID: 29922710 PMCID: PMC6005799 DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2018.06.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2018] [Revised: 06/07/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Data from colon, breast and prostate cancers suggest that aspirin users have reduced mortality. While the direct mechanism remains uncertain, aspirin can suppress the COX-dependent and independent pathways involved in tumor progression. We hypothesized that aspirin users with clear cell ovarian cancer would have improved survival outcomes. We performed a retrospective review of patients with clear cell ovarian cancer diagnosed between 1995 and 2010, and followed outcomes through 2016. Patients underwent primary cytoreductive surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy. Aspirin use was defined by medication documentation in two records more than six months apart. Statistical tests included Fisher's exact, Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Seventy-seven patients met inclusion criteria. Fifty-four patients (70%) had stage I-II disease. Thirteen patients (17%) used aspirin. Aspirin users had a statistically longer disease-free survival compared to non-users (HR 0.13, p = .018). While median disease-free survival was not reached for either group, 1 of 13 (8%) aspirin users recurred at 24 months, compared to 18 of 64 (28%) non-users. Aspirin users demonstrated longer overall survival (HR 0.13, p = .015). Median survival was not reached for aspirin users, compared to 166 months for non-users. Aspirin use retained significance (HR 0.13, p = .044) after controlling for age, stage and cytoreductive status. In this small cohort of women with clear cell ovarian cancer, aspirin use correlated with improved disease-free and overall survival, and retained independent significance as a positive prognostic factor. Further research is warranted to confirm these findings before considering aspirin as a therapeutic intervention.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alyssa M Wield
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Christine S Walsh
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Ilana Cass
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Andrew J Li
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Marsh L, Kamara D, Rimel BJ. Implementing genetic risk assessment in a community free clinic. J Clin Oncol 2018. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2018.36.15_suppl.1585] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Leah Marsh
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA
| | | | - BJ Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Hollywood, CA
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Dixon-Suen SC, Nagle CM, Thrift AP, Pharoah PDP, Ewing A, Pearce CL, Zheng W, Chenevix-Trench G, Fasching PA, Beckmann MW, Lambrechts D, Vergote I, Lambrechts S, Van Nieuwenhuysen E, Rossing MA, Doherty JA, Wicklund KG, Chang-Claude J, Jung AY, Moysich KB, Odunsi K, Goodman MT, Wilkens LR, Thompson PJ, Shvetsov YB, Dörk T, Park-Simon TW, Hillemanns P, Bogdanova N, Butzow R, Nevanlinna H, Pelttari LM, Leminen A, Modugno F, Ness RB, Edwards RP, Kelley JL, Heitz F, du Bois A, Harter P, Schwaab I, Karlan BY, Lester J, Orsulic S, Rimel BJ, Kjær SK, Høgdall E, Jensen A, Goode EL, Fridley BL, Cunningham JM, Winham SJ, Giles GG, Bruinsma F, Milne RL, Southey MC, Hildebrandt MAT, Wu X, Lu KH, Liang D, Levine DA, Bisogna M, Schildkraut JM, Berchuck A, Cramer DW, Terry KL, Bandera EV, Olson SH, Salvesen HB, Thomsen LCV, Kopperud RK, Bjorge L, Kiemeney LA, Massuger LFAG, Pejovic T, Bruegl A, Cook LS, Le ND, Swenerton KD, Brooks-Wilson A, Kelemen LE, Lubiński J, Huzarski T, Gronwald J, Menkiszak J, Wentzensen N, Brinton L, Yang H, Lissowska J, Høgdall CK, Lundvall L, Song H, Tyrer JP, Campbell I, Eccles D, Paul J, Glasspool R, Siddiqui N, Whittemore AS, Sieh W, McGuire V, Rothstein JH, Narod SA, Phelan C, Risch HA, McLaughlin JR, Anton-Culver H, Ziogas A, Menon U, Gayther SA, Ramus SJ, Gentry-Maharaj A, Wu AH, Pike MC, Tseng CC, Kupryjanczyk J, Dansonka-Mieszkowska A, Budzilowska A, Rzepecka IK, Webb PM. Adult height is associated with increased risk of ovarian cancer: a Mendelian randomisation study. Br J Cancer 2018; 118:1123-1129. [PMID: 29555990 PMCID: PMC5931085 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-018-0011-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2017] [Accepted: 01/09/2018] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Observational studies suggest greater height is associated with increased ovarian cancer risk, but cannot exclude bias and/or confounding as explanations for this. Mendelian randomisation (MR) can provide evidence which may be less prone to bias. METHODS We pooled data from 39 Ovarian Cancer Association Consortium studies (16,395 cases; 23,003 controls). We applied two-stage predictor-substitution MR, using a weighted genetic risk score combining 609 single-nucleotide polymorphisms. Study-specific odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for the association between genetically predicted height and risk were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. RESULTS Greater genetically predicted height was associated with increased ovarian cancer risk overall (pooled-OR (pOR) = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11 per 5 cm increase in height), and separately for invasive (pOR = 1.06; 95% CI: 1.01-1.11) and borderline (pOR = 1.15; 95% CI: 1.02-1.29) tumours. CONCLUSIONS Women with a genetic propensity to being taller have increased risk of ovarian cancer. This suggests genes influencing height are involved in pathways promoting ovarian carcinogenesis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzanne C Dixon-Suen
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
- The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Level 2 Public Health Building (887), Corner of Herston Road & Wyndham Street, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia.
| | - Christina M Nagle
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Level 2 Public Health Building (887), Corner of Herston Road & Wyndham Street, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Aaron P Thrift
- Department of Medicine and Dan L Duncan Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Paul D P Pharoah
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health & Primary Care/Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Ailith Ewing
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health & Primary Care/Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Celeste Leigh Pearce
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan School of Public Health, 1415 Washington Heights, SPH Tower, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109-2029, USA
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Wei Zheng
- Vanderbilt Epidemiology Center, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, 2525 West End Ave., Nashville, TN, 37203, USA
| | - Georgia Chenevix-Trench
- Cancer Genetics Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| | - Peter A Fasching
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California at Los Angeles, 10833 Le Conte Ave, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Matthias W Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospital Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen-EMN, Universitätsstrasse 21-23, 91054, Erlangen, Germany
| | - Diether Lambrechts
- Vesalius Research Center, VIB, Herestraat 49, bus 912, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
- Laboratory for Translational Genetics, Department of Oncology, University of Leuven, O&N IV Herestraat 49-Box 912, 3000, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Ignace Vergote
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Sandrina Lambrechts
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Els Van Nieuwenhuysen
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology and Leuven Cancer Institute, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, Leuven, 3000, Belgium
| | - Mary Anne Rossing
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Washington, 1959 NE Pacific Street, Health Sciences Bldg, F-262, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA
| | - Jennifer A Doherty
- Department of Epidemiology, The Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth, 1 Medical Center Drive, 7927 Rubin Building, Lebanon, NH, 03756, USA
| | - Kristine G Wicklund
- Program in Epidemiology, Division of Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, 1100 Fairview Ave. N., Seattle, WA, 98109-1024, USA
| | - Jenny Chang-Claude
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
- University Cancer Center Hamburg, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Martinistr. 52, 20246, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Audrey Y Jung
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology, German Cancer Research Center, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, Heidelberg, 69120, Germany
| | - Kirsten B Moysich
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Kunle Odunsi
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Roswell Park Cancer Institute, Elm and Carlton Streets, Buffalo, NY, 14263, USA
| | - Marc T Goodman
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
- Community and Population Health Research Institute, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Lynne R Wilkens
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | - Pamela J Thompson
- Cancer Prevention and Control, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8700 Beverly Blvd., Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Yurii B Shvetsov
- Cancer Epidemiology Program, University of Hawaii Cancer Center, 701 Ilalo Street, Honolulu, HI, 96813, USA
| | - Thilo Dörk
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Tjoung-Won Park-Simon
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Peter Hillemanns
- Clinics of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Natalia Bogdanova
- Radiation Oncology Research Unit, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Str. 1, D-30625, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ralf Butzow
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heli Nevanlinna
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Liisa M Pelttari
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arto Leminen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 8, 00029, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Francesmary Modugno
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
- Ovarian Cancer Center of Excellence, Women's Cancer Research Program, Magee-Women's Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Pittsburgh Graduate School of Public Health, 130 De Soto Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15261, USA
| | - Roberta B Ness
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, School of Public Health, 1200 Herman Pressler, Suite E-1015, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Robert P Edwards
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
- Ovarian Cancer Center of Excellence, Women's Cancer Research Program, Magee-Women's Research Institute and University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute, 204 Craft Avenue, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Joseph L Kelley
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, 300 Halket Street, Pittsburgh, PA, 15213, USA
| | - Florian Heitz
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte/ Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung/ Knappschaft GmbH, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100, 65199, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Andreas du Bois
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte/ Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung/ Knappschaft GmbH, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100, 65199, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Philipp Harter
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Kliniken Essen-Mitte/ Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung/ Knappschaft GmbH, Henricistrasse 92, 45136, Essen, Germany
- Department of Gynecology and Gynecologic Oncology, Dr. Horst Schmidt Kliniken Wiesbaden, Ludwig-Erhard-Strasse 100, 65199, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Ira Schwaab
- Praxis für Humangenetik, Biebricher Allee 117, 65187, Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Beth Y Karlan
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8635 West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Jenny Lester
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8635 West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Sandra Orsulic
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8635 West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Bobbie J Rimel
- Women's Cancer Program at the Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, 8635 West Third Street, Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Susanne K Kjær
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Estrid Høgdall
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Molecular Unit, Department of Pathology, Herlev Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Herlev Ringvej 75, DK-2370, Herlev, Denmark
| | - Allan Jensen
- Department of Virus, Lifestyle and Genes, Danish Cancer Society Research Center, Strandboulevarden 49, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Ellen L Goode
- Department of Health Science Research, Division of Epidemiology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Brooke L Fridley
- Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Julie M Cunningham
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Stabile 13, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Stacey J Winham
- Division of Biomedical Statistics and Informatics, Department of Health Science Research, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Charlton 6, Rochester, MN, 55905, USA
| | - Graham G Giles
- Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
- Department of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, Monash University, The Alfred Centre, 99 Commercial Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Fiona Bruinsma
- Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
| | - Roger L Milne
- Cancer Epidemiology and Intelligence Division, Cancer Council Victoria, 615 St Kilda Road, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia
- Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Melissa C Southey
- Genetic Epidemiology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Carlton, VIC 3053, Australia
| | - Michelle A T Hildebrandt
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Blvd-Unit 1340, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Xifeng Wu
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Blvd-Unit 1340, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1155 Pressler Blvd - Unit 1340, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dong Liang
- College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Texas Southern University, 3100 Cleburne St, Houston, TX, 77004, USA
| | - Douglas A Levine
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics And Gynecology, NYU Langone Medical Center, 240 East 38th Street, New York, NY, 10016, USA
| | - Maria Bisogna
- Gynecology Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 417 East 68th Street, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Joellen M Schildkraut
- Department of Public Health Sciences, The University of Virginia, Box 800717, Charlotteville, VA, 22908, USA
| | - Andrew Berchuck
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Duke University Medical Center, 25171 Morris Bldg, Durham, NC, 27710, USA
| | - Daniel W Cramer
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Richardson Fuller Building, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Kathryn L Terry
- Obstetrics and Gynecology Epidemiology Center, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 221 Longwood Avenue, Richardson Fuller Building, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Ave, Boston, MA, 02115, USA
| | - Elisa V Bandera
- Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, 195 Little Albany Street, New Brunswick, NJ, 08903, USA
- Rutgers School of Public Health, 683 Hoes Lane West, Piscataway, NJ, 08854, USA
| | - Sara H Olson
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Helga B Salvesen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Kvinneklinikken, Jonas Liesvei 72, 5058, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Liv Cecilie Vestrheim Thomsen
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Kvinneklinikken, Jonas Liesvei 72, 5058, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Reidun K Kopperud
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Kvinneklinikken, Jonas Liesvei 72, 5058, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Line Bjorge
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, Kvinneklinikken, Jonas Liesvei 72, 5058, Bergen, Norway
- Centre for Cancer Biomarkers, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Postboks 7804, N-5020, Bergen, Norway
| | - Lambertus A Kiemeney
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Health Sciences, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Leon F A G Massuger
- Radboud University Medical Center, Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences, Department of Gynaecology, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Tanja Pejovic
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Amanda Bruegl
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Linda S Cook
- Division of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Department of Internal Medicine, University of New Mexico, 2703 Frontier Ave NE, Albuquerque, NM, 87131, USA
| | - Nhu D Le
- Cancer Control Research, BC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Kenneth D Swenerton
- Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, 2775 Laurel Street, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Angela Brooks-Wilson
- Canada's Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, 675 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, BC, Canada
- Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, 8888 University Drive, Burnaby, BC, V5A 1S6, Canada
| | - Linda E Kelemen
- Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, 68 President Street, Bioengineering Building, Charleston, SC, 29425, USA
| | - Jan Lubiński
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Połabska 4, Szczecin, 70-115, Poland
| | - Tomasz Huzarski
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Połabska 4, Szczecin, 70-115, Poland
| | - Jacek Gronwald
- International Hereditary Cancer Center, Department of Genetics and Pathology, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Połabska 4, Szczecin, 70-115, Poland
| | - Janusz Menkiszak
- Department of Gynecological Surgery and Gynecological Oncology of Adults and Adolescents, Pomeranian Medical University, ul. Powstańców Wlkp 72, 70-111, Szczecin, Poland
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Louise Brinton
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Hannah Yang
- Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, 9609 Medical Center Drive, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
| | - Jolanta Lissowska
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Wawelska 15B, 02-034, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Claus K Høgdall
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Lene Lundvall
- Department of Gynaecology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 9, DK-2100, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Honglin Song
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health & Primary Care/Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Jonathan P Tyrer
- Strangeways Research Laboratory, Centre for Cancer Genetic Epidemiology, Department of Public Health & Primary Care/Department of Oncology, University of Cambridge, Worts Causeway, Cambridge, CB1 8RN, UK
| | - Ian Campbell
- Cancer Genetics Laboratory, Research Division, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, St Andrews Place, Melbourne, VIC 3002, Australia
- Department of Pathology, University of Melbourne, Grattan Street, Carlton, VIC, 3053, Australia
| | - Diana Eccles
- Faculty of Medicine, Southampton University Hospitals Trust, Princess Anne Hospital, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO16 5YA, UK
| | - James Paul
- Cancer Research UK Clinical Trials Unit Glasgow, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Glasgow, 1053 Gt. Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - Rosalind Glasspool
- The Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, 1053 Gt. Western Road, Glasgow, G12 0YN, UK
| | - Nadeem Siddiqui
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Glasgow Royal Infirmary, Alexandra Parade, Glasgow, G31 2ER, UK
| | - Alice S Whittemore
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, HRP Redwood Building, 259 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Weiva Sieh
- Departments of Population Health Science & Policy and Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Valerie McGuire
- Department of Health Research and Policy-Epidemiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, HRP Redwood Building, 259 Campus Drive, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
| | - Joseph H Rothstein
- Departments of Population Health Science & Policy and Genetics & Genomic Sciences, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, 1 Gustave L. Levy Place, New York, NY, 10029, USA
| | - Steven A Narod
- Women's College Research Institute, University of Toronto, 790 Bay Street, Toronto, ON, M5G 1N8, Canada
| | - Catherine Phelan
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Moffitt Cancer Center, 12902 Magnolia Drive, Tampa, FL, 33612, USA
| | - Harvey A Risch
- Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, Yale School of Public Health, LEPH 413, 60 College Street, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA
| | - John R McLaughlin
- Public Health Ontario, 480 University Avenue (/300), Toronto, ON, M5G1V2, Canada
| | - Hoda Anton-Culver
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, 224 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697-7550, USA
- Genetic Epidemiology Research Institute, UCI Center for Cancer Genetics Research & Prevention, School of Medicine, University of California Irvine, 224 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697-7550, USA
| | - Argyrios Ziogas
- Department of Epidemiology, University of California Irvine, 224 Irvine Hall, Irvine, CA, 92697-7550, USA
| | - Usha Menon
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7DN, UK
| | - Simon A Gayther
- Center for Cancer Prevention and Translational Genomics, Samuel Oschin Cancer Institute, Spielberg Building, 8725 Alden Dr., Los Angeles, CA, 90048, USA
| | - Susan J Ramus
- School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Level 1, Women's Health Institute, Royal Hospital for Women, Barker Street, Randwick, NSW, 2031, Australia
- The Kinghorn Cancer Centre, Garvan Institute of Medical Research, 384 Victoria Street, Darlinghurst, NSW, 2010, Australia
| | - Aleksandra Gentry-Maharaj
- Women's Cancer, Institute for Women's Health, University College London, Maple House 1st Floor, 149 Tottenham Court Road, London, W1T 7DN, UK
| | - Anna H Wu
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Malcolm C Pike
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Ave, New York, NY, 10017, USA
| | - Chiu-Chen Tseng
- Department of Preventive Medicine, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, 1441 Eastlake Avenue, Los Angeles, CA, 90033, USA
| | - Jolanta Kupryjanczyk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Dansonka-Mieszkowska
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Agnieszka Budzilowska
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Iwona K Rzepecka
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Diagnostics, The Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center and Institute of Oncology, Roentgena 5, 02-781, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Penelope M Webb
- Gynaecological Cancers Group, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, 300 Herston Road, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
- The University of Queensland, School of Public Health, Level 2 Public Health Building (887), Corner of Herston Road & Wyndham Street, Brisbane, QLD 4006, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Lheureux S, McCourt C, Rimel BJ, Duska L, Fleming G, Mackay H, Mutch D, Temkin SM, Lynn J, Kohn EC. Moving forward with actionable therapeutic targets and opportunities in endometrial cancer: A NCI clinical trials planning meeting report. Gynecol Oncol 2018; 149:S0090-8258(18)30124-0. [PMID: 29477660 PMCID: PMC9465931 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2018.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2017] [Revised: 02/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
The incidence of endometrial cancer (EC) in the U.S. has been rising, from an estimated annual incidence of 49,560 in 2013 to 61,380 in 2017. Meanwhile, the SEER-based relative survival of women with EC in the U.S. has remained flat [82.3% from 1987 to 1989, 82.8% from 2007 to 2013] and our recent increased understanding of EC biology and subtypes has not been translated into therapeutic advances. The U.S. National Cancer Institute (NCI) therefore convened a Uterine Clinical Trials Planning Meeting in January 2016 to initiate and accelerate design of molecularly-targeted EC trials. Prior to the meeting a group of experts in this field summarized available data, emphasizing data on human samples, to identify potentially actionable alterations in EC, and the results of their work has been separately published. The Clinical Trials Meeting planners focused on discussion of (1) novel trial designs, including window-of opportunity trials and appropriate control groups for randomized trials, (2) targets specific to serous carcinoma and promises and pitfalls of separate trials for women with tumors of this histology (3) specific recommendations for future randomized trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - B J Rimel
- Cedars Sinai Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Linda Duska
- University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, United States
| | - Gini Fleming
- University of Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States
| | - Helen Mackay
- University of Toronto, Sunnybrook, Toronto, Canada
| | - David Mutch
- Washington University St. Louis, MO, United States
| | - Sarah M Temkin
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, United States
| | - Jean Lynn
- Coordinating Center for Clinical Trials, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States
| | - Elise C Kohn
- Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD, United States.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Gresham G, Schrack J, Gresham LM, Shinde AM, Hendifar AE, Tuli R, Rimel BJ, Figlin R, Meinert CL, Piantadosi S. Wearable activity monitors in oncology trials: Current use of an emerging technology. Contemp Clin Trials 2017; 64:13-21. [PMID: 29129704 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2017] [Revised: 10/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/01/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Physical activity is an important outcome in oncology trials. Physical activity is commonly assessed using self-reported questionnaires, which are limited by recall and response biases. Recent advancements in wearable technology have provided oncologists with new opportunities to obtain real-time, objective physical activity data. The purpose of this review was to describe current uses of wearable activity monitors in oncology trials. METHODS We searched Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for oncology trials involving wearable activity monitors published between 2005 and 2016. We extracted details on study design, types of activity monitors used, and purpose for their use. We summarized activity monitor metrics including step counts, sleep and sedentary time, and time spent in moderate-to-vigorous activity. RESULTS We identified 41 trials of which 26 (63%) involved cancer survivors (post-treatment) and 15 trials (37%) involved patients with active cancer. Most trials (65%) involved breast cancer patients. Wearable activity monitors were commonly used in exercise (54%) or behavioral (29%) trials. Cancer survivors take between 4660 and 11,000 steps/day and those undergoing treatment take 2885 to 8300steps/day. CONCLUSION Wearable activity monitors are increasingly being used to obtain objective measures of physical activity in oncology trials. There is potential for their use to expand to evaluate and predict clinical outcomes such as survival, quality of life, and treatment tolerance in future studies. Currently, there remains a lack of standardization in the types of monitors being used and how their data are being collected, analyzed, and interpreted. PRECIS Recent advancements in wearable activity monitor technology have provided oncologists with new opportunities to monitor their patients' daily activity in real-world settings. The integration of wearable activity monitors into cancer care will help increase our understanding of the associations between physical activity and the prevention and management of the disease, in addition to other important cancer outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gillian Gresham
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, United States; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, United States.
| | - Jennifer Schrack
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, United States
| | | | - Arvind M Shinde
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, United States
| | - Andrew E Hendifar
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, United States
| | - Richard Tuli
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, United States
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, United States
| | - Robert Figlin
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, United States
| | - Curtis L Meinert
- Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Department of Epidemiology, United States
| | - Steven Piantadosi
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, United States
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Rimel BJ, Gibson SJ, Sumner DA, Monk BJ. The American Society of Clinical Oncology 2017 Annual Meeting: A review and summary of selected abstracts. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 146:443-448. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.06.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
44
|
Wenzel L, Mukamel D, Osann K, Havrilesky L, Sparks L, Lipscomb J, Wright AA, Walker J, Alvarez R, Van Le L, Robison K, Bristow R, Morgan R, Rimel BJ, Ladd H, Hsieh S, Wahi A, Cohn D. Rationale and study protocol for the Patient-Centered Outcome Aid (PCOA) randomized controlled trial: A personalized decision tool for newly diagnosed ovarian cancer patients. Contemp Clin Trials 2017; 57:29-36. [PMID: 28330753 PMCID: PMC6198815 DOI: 10.1016/j.cct.2017.03.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Revised: 03/04/2017] [Accepted: 03/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- L Wenzel
- University of California, Irvine, United States.
| | - D Mukamel
- University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - K Osann
- University of California, Irvine, United States
| | | | - L Sparks
- Chapman University, United States
| | | | - A A Wright
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute, United States
| | - J Walker
- University of Oklahoma, United States
| | - R Alvarez
- Vanderbilt University, United States
| | - L Van Le
- University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
| | | | - R Bristow
- University of California, Irvine, United States
| | | | | | - H Ladd
- University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - S Hsieh
- University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - A Wahi
- University of California, Irvine, United States
| | - D Cohn
- Ohio State University, United States
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Rimel BJ. Chemotherapy completion in elderly women: can we identify those who behave younger than their stated age? Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144:449-450. [PMID: 28212779 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2017.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- B J Rimel
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rimel BJ, Gibson SJ, Sumner DA, Monk BJ. The American Society of Clinical Oncology 2016 annual meeting: A review and summary of selected abstracts. Gynecol Oncol 2017; 144:e1-e7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2016.10.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
47
|
Mirza MR, Monk BJ, Herrstedt J, Oza AM, Mahner S, Redondo A, Fabbro M, Ledermann JA, Lorusso D, Vergote I, Ben-Baruch NE, Marth C, Mądry R, Christensen RD, Berek JS, Dørum A, Tinker AV, du Bois A, González-Martín A, Follana P, Benigno B, Rosenberg P, Gilbert L, Rimel BJ, Buscema J, Balser JP, Agarwal S, Matulonis UA. Niraparib Maintenance Therapy in Platinum-Sensitive, Recurrent Ovarian Cancer. N Engl J Med 2016; 375:2154-2164. [PMID: 27717299 DOI: 10.1056/nejmoa1611310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1609] [Impact Index Per Article: 201.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Niraparib is an oral poly(adenosine diphosphate [ADP]-ribose) polymerase (PARP) 1/2 inhibitor that has shown clinical activity in patients with ovarian cancer. We sought to evaluate the efficacy of niraparib versus placebo as maintenance treatment for patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer. METHODS In this randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial, patients were categorized according to the presence or absence of a germline BRCA mutation (gBRCA cohort and non-gBRCA cohort) and the type of non-gBRCA mutation and were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive niraparib (300 mg) or placebo once daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival. RESULTS Of 553 enrolled patients, 203 were in the gBRCA cohort (with 138 assigned to niraparib and 65 to placebo), and 350 patients were in the non-gBRCA cohort (with 234 assigned to niraparib and 116 to placebo). Patients in the niraparib group had a significantly longer median duration of progression-free survival than did those in the placebo group, including 21.0 vs. 5.5 months in the gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.27; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.17 to 0.41), as compared with 12.9 months vs. 3.8 months in the non-gBRCA cohort for patients who had tumors with homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) (hazard ratio, 0.38; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.59) and 9.3 months vs. 3.9 months in the overall non-gBRCA cohort (hazard ratio, 0.45; 95% CI, 0.34 to 0.61; P<0.001 for all three comparisons). The most common grade 3 or 4 adverse events that were reported in the niraparib group were thrombocytopenia (in 33.8%), anemia (in 25.3%), and neutropenia (in 19.6%), which were managed with dose modifications. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with platinum-sensitive, recurrent ovarian cancer, the median duration of progression-free survival was significantly longer among those receiving niraparib than among those receiving placebo, regardless of the presence or absence of gBRCA mutations or HRD status, with moderate bone marrow toxicity. (Funded by Tesaro; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01847274 .).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mansoor R Mirza
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Bradley J Monk
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Jørn Herrstedt
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Amit M Oza
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Sven Mahner
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Andrés Redondo
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Michel Fabbro
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan A Ledermann
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Domenica Lorusso
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Ignace Vergote
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Noa E Ben-Baruch
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Christian Marth
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Radosław Mądry
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - René D Christensen
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Jonathan S Berek
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Anne Dørum
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Anna V Tinker
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Andreas du Bois
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Antonio González-Martín
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Philippe Follana
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Benedict Benigno
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Per Rosenberg
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Lucy Gilbert
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Bobbie J Rimel
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Joseph Buscema
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - John P Balser
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Shefali Agarwal
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| | - Ursula A Matulonis
- From the Nordic Society of Gynecological Oncology and Rigshospitalet-Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen (M.R.M.), Odense University Hospital (J.H.) and European Network for Gynacological Oncological Trial and Research Unit of General Practice, Institute of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense (R.D.C.) - all in Denmark; University of Arizona and Creighton University-Phoenix, Phoenix (B.J.M.), and Arizona Oncology Associates, Tuscon (B.J.M., J.B.) - all in Arizona; Princess Margaret Consortium, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, University Health Network, University of Toronto, Toronto (A.M.O.), British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver (A.V.T.), and McGill University-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal (L.G.) - all in Canada; Arbeitsgemeinschaft Gynäkologische Onkologie (AGO) and the University of Munich, Munich (S.M.), and Kliniken Essen Mitte, Essen (A.B.) - both in Germany; Grupo Español de Investigación en Cáncer de Ovario (GEICO) and Hospital Universitario La Paz (A.R.), and GEICO and M.D. Anderson Cancer Center Madrid (A.G.-M.), Madrid; French Investigator Group for Ovarian and Breast Cancer (GINECO) and Institut du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier (M.F.), and GINECO and Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice (P.F.) - both in France; National Cancer Research Institute and UCL Cancer Institute, University College London, London (J.A.L.); Multicenter Italian Trials in Ovarian Cancer/Mario Negri Gynecologic Oncology Group, Fondazione Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico, Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan (D.L.); Belgium and Luxembourg Gynecological Oncology Group and University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium (I.V.); Kaplan Medical Center, Rehovot, Israel (N.E.B.-B.); AGO-Austria and Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria (C.M.); Central and Eastern European Gynecologic Oncology Group and Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu, Poznan, Poland (R.M.); Stanford Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Stanford (J.S.B.), and Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, West Hollywood (B.J.R.) - both in California; Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo (A.D.); Northside Hospital, Atlanta (B.B.); Universitetssjukhuset, Linköping, Sweden (P.R.); and Veristat, Southborough (J.P.B.), Tesaro, Waltham (S.A.), and Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston (U.A.M.) - all in Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Affiliation(s)
- B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, CA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Dolly D, Mihai A, Rimel BJ, Fogg L, Rotmensch J, Guirguis A, Yordan E, Dewdney S. A Delay from Diagnosis to Treatment Is Associated with a Decreased Overall Survival for Patients with Endometrial Cancer. Front Oncol 2016; 6:31. [PMID: 26904507 PMCID: PMC4751250 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2016.00031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2015] [Accepted: 01/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives While Caucasian women are more likely to be diagnosed with endometrial cancer compared to African-American women, the rate of mortality is higher for African Americans. The cause of this disparity is unknown. We analyzed the time interval from diagnosis of endometrial cancer to treatment as it pertains to race and socioeconomic factors and its possible impact on survival. Methods This was a retrospective, single institution chart review using a cancer registry database. We identified 889 patients who were diagnosed with endometrial cancer between January 2005 and June 2012. Clinicopathologic characteristics, demographics, insurance status, distance from medical center, body mass index (BMI), dates of diagnosis, and treatment were obtained from the medical records. Survival and association was determined by a one-way ANOVA test. Results At the time of the study, 699 patients were alive and 190 dead. The average age was noted to be 62 years (24–91 years). Stages I–IV disease accounted for 69, 6, 15, and 10%, respectively. White race accounted for 64%, African Americans 24%, and Hispanics 7% of our study population. Majority of patients were privately insured (n = 441) followed by Medicare (n = 375). The mean interval time from diagnosis to treatment was 47.5 days (0–363). A statistically significant difference was noted for this time interval with regard to both race and insurance status: white and African Americans (42.6 vs. 57.3 days, p = 0.048), privately insured and Medicare (38.4 vs. 54.1 days, p < 0.001). There was a significant association with increased risk of death with a longer delay (43.3 vs. 64.8 days, p < 0.001). No statistically significance was noted for distance from medical center or BMI. Conclusion A significant increase in interval of time from diagnosis to treatment of endometrial cancer was seen in both race and insurance status. A longer interval from diagnosis to treatment was associated mortality. The causes of these delays are likely multifactorial but deem further investigation given these data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Andreea Mihai
- University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics , Iowa City, IA , USA
| | - B J Rimel
- Cedars-Sinai Medical Center , Los Angeles, CA , USA
| | - Louis Fogg
- Rush University Medical Center , Chicago, IL , USA
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gangi A, Cass I, Paik D, Barmparas G, Karlan B, Dang C, Li A, Walsh C, Rimel BJ, Amersi FF. Breast cancer following ovarian cancer in BRCA mutation carriers. JAMA Surg 2015; 149:1306-13. [PMID: 25372568 DOI: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.1081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE BRCA mutation carriers are at increased risk of developing breast cancer. However, the incidence of breast cancer after a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), one of the tubal/peritoneal cancers collectively referred to as pelvic serous carcinomas, is not well known. Optimal breast cancer surveillance and detection for these patients have also not been well characterized. OBJECTIVES To determine the incidence of breast cancer after a diagnosis of EOC and to evaluate the need for breast cancer surveillance for these patients. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS A retrospective database review of 364 patients who underwent BRCA mutation testing for EOC (stages I-IV) between 1998 and 2012 at an academic medical center with gynecologic and breast cancer centers. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Incidence of breast cancer and methods of surveillance. RESULTS Of 364 patients, 135 (37.1%) were found to carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation. The mean age of patients at diagnosis of EOC was 49.5 years (range, 28-89 years). Of the 135 patients, 12 (8.9%) developed breast cancer. The median time from diagnosis of EOC to diagnosis of breast cancer was 50.5 months. Annual mammography was performed for 80 patients (59.3%), with annual magnetic resonance imaging of the breasts performed for 60 patients (44.4%). Thirteen patients (9.6%) underwent a bilateral prophylactic mastectomy at a median of 23 months following EOC diagnosis. Breast cancer was most commonly diagnosed by mammography for 7 of the 12 patients (58.3%), 3 (25.0%) of whom had a palpable mass and 2 (16.7%) of whom had incidental breast cancer detected during a prophylactic mastectomy. Seven patients with breast cancer (58.3%) underwent a bilateral mastectomy. All patients had early-stage breast cancer (stages 0-II). Four patients (33.3%) received adjuvant chemotherapy. At a median follow-up of 6.3 years, 4 of the 12 patients (33.3%) died of recurrent EOC after a diagnosis of breast cancer. The overall 10-year survival rate for the entire cohort of 135 patients was 17.0%. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The risk of metachronous breast cancer is low in patients with known BRCA mutations and EOC. A majority of these cases of breast cancer at an early stage are detected by use of mammography. Despite the small number of patients in our study, these results suggest that optimal breast cancer surveillance for patients with BRCA-associated EOC needs to be reevaluated given the low incidence of breast cancer among these high-risk patients. Confirmation of our findings from larger studies seems to be indicated.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexandra Gangi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Ilana Cass
- Division of Gynecology-Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Daniel Paik
- Division of Gynecology-Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Galinos Barmparas
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Beth Karlan
- Division of Gynecology-Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Catherine Dang
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrew Li
- Division of Gynecology-Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Christine Walsh
- Division of Gynecology-Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Bobbie J Rimel
- Division of Gynecology-Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| | - Farin F Amersi
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California
| |
Collapse
|