Breast Cancer in Women Aged 25 Years and Younger

Breast Cancer in Chinese Females Aged 25 Years and Younger

BACKGROUND

Breast cancer has both aggressive clinicopathological characteristics and a poor prognosis in young females. However, limited information is available for breast cancer in Chinese females aged ≤25 years. Therefore, we aimed to explore prognostic factors for invasive disease-free (iDFS) and overall survival (OS) among breast cancer patients aged ≤25 years.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from 174 Chinese females aged ≤25 years with invasive breast cancer treated in the Cancer Hospital of the Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences from January 1, 1999, to December 31, 2018. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time was 75 months (ranging from 1 to 236 months). Breast cancer patients aged ≤25 years exhibited aggressive clinicopathological characteristics, including advanced tumor stage (21.8%), lymph node metastasis (47.1%), lymphovascular invasion (24.1%), estrogen receptor negativity (44.3%), progesterone receptor (PR) negativity (42.5%), and triple-negative breast cancer (25.3%). Among them, 50 cases had locoregional recurrence and metastasis, 20 had bilateral invasiveness, and 33 had breast cancer-specific deaths. Cox multivariate analysis identified that diagnosis delay, PR status, and radiotherapy were significant prognostic factors for both iDFS and OS (P < 0.05). The risk of recurrence and metastasis was five times higher in N3 than in N0 (HR: 6.778, 95% CI: 2.268-17.141, P < 0.001). Patients with lymphovascular invasion had a threefold increase in the risk of breast cancer-specific death (HR: 4.217, 95% CI: 1.956-9.090, P < 0.001). No differences were observed between mastectomy and breast-conserving surgery (BCS) plus radiotherapy for iDFS or OS (iDFS: χ 2 = 0.678, P=0.410; OS: χ 2 = 0.165, P=0.685).

CONCLUSIONS

Breast cancer in females ≤25 years old was associated with aggressive clinical features and a worse prognosis. Young females with breast lumps should receive timely diagnosis and treatment. Young breast cancer patients with lymphovascular invasion, PR-negative status, and lymph node metastasis have an increased risk of experiencing recurrence and metastasis and should hence be closely monitored. Age at diagnosis should not be the sole deciding factor for surgical treatment methods.

Om.breast cancer in very young women aged 25 year-old or below in the center of Tunisia and review of the literature

Breast cancer in very young women under 40 or 35 years attracted a widespread attention. Few studies have focused on women aged below 25 years. The aim of this study was to evaluate the situation of breast cancer in women ≤25 years in the center of Tunisia. Retrospective review from 1993 to 2013. Clinical, histopathological, therapeutic and outcome data were recorded. Cases were classified into different molecular subtypes based on the immunohistochemistry-based definitions. The series included 25 patients. The mean duration of symptoms was 7.5 months. The most common presenting symptom was a palpable mass. Four patients had at least one relative diagnosed with breast cancer. Mammography combined with ultrasound was suggestive of malignancy in 60 % of cases. Curative surgical treatment could be offered in 19 cases. The mean tumor size was 39 mm. Nodal metastases were detected in 9/18 cases. Twenty cases could be classified into: luminal A (5 cases), luminal B (6 cases), Her-2 (1 case), triple negative (6 cases) and unclassified (2 cases). Two women experienced locoregional recurrence and 6 had distant recurrence. Asynchronous contralateral breast cancer occurred in one case. The overall survival at 5 and 10 years was 85 and 75 % respectively. The survival was significantly lower in grade III tumors (p = 0.04) and triple negative tumors (p = 0.03). Breast cancer in women ≤25 years is uncommon. An adequate medical education of young women and physicians is necessary.

Breast disorders in girls and adolescents. Is there a need for a specialized service?

INTRODUCTION

Minor breast concerns in childhood and adolescence are common and lead to increased anxiety among young patients and their families, particularly due to high correlation with breast cancer. However, most breast services aim at managing adults and triaging patients with breast cancer, whereas adolescent medicine specialists or pediatricians are usually not appropriately trained to identify and treat breast pathology.

METHODS

We reviewed hospital records of all patients attending a pediatric and adolescent gynecology or breast clinic of a tertiary referral hospital, with a breast related symptom, between January 2009 and December 2011. We collected information regarding age at presentation, age at menarche, diagnosis, management and outcome.

RESULTS

We identified 81 patients of which 11 presented with an abnormal nipple or areolar secretion, 33 had a palpable lump, 20 had mastitis, and 16 had unequal breast development. One patient presented with virginal breast hypertrophy. Three out of 11 of the patients with an abnormal secretion had a cyst identified on ultrasonography. Out of the palpable lumps 12 were fibroadenomas, 3 were phyllodes tumors, and 14 were cystic in nature. The phyllodes tumors and half of the fibroadenomas were removed. The remaining fibroadenomas remain under regular ultrasonographic follow-up. All cases of mastitis were treated conservatively and resolved with broad spectrum antibiotic treatment.

CONCLUSION

In our series, no malignancies were identified. Although 8 patients required surgical treatment, the majority of cases were treated conservatively.

MicroRNAs discriminate familial from sporadic non-BRCA1/2 breast carcinoma arising in patients ≤35 years

The influence of genetic factors may contribute to the poor prognosis of breast cancer (BC) at a very young age. However BRCA1/2 mutations could not explain the majority of cases arising in these patients. MicroRNAs (miRs) have been implicated in biological processes associated with BC. Therefore, we investigated differences in miRs expression between tumors from young patients (≤35 years) with sporadic or familial history and non-carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations. Thirty-six young Brazilian patients were divided into 2 groups: sporadic (NF-BC) or familial breast cancer (F-BC). Most of the samples were classified as luminal A and B and the frequency of subtypes did not differ between familial or sporadic cases. Using real time qPCR and discriminant function analysis, we identified 9 miRs whose expression levels rather than miR identity can discriminate between both patient groups. Candidate predicted targets were determined by combining results from miRWalk algorithms with mRNA expression profiles (n = 91 differently expressed genes). MiR/mRNA integrated analysis identified 91 candidate genes showing positive or negative correlation to at least 1 of the 9 miRs. Co-expression analysis of these genes with 9 miRs indicated that 49 differentially co-expressed miR-gene interactions changes in F-BC tumors as compared to those of NF-BC tumors. Out of 49, 17 (34.6%) of predicted miR-gene interactions showed an inverse correlation suggesting that miRs act as post-transcriptional regulators, whereas 14 (28.6%) miR-gene pairs tended to be co-expressed in the same direction indicating that the effects exerted by these miRs pointed to a complex level of target regulation. The remaining 18 pairs were not predicted by our criteria suggesting involvement of other regulators. MiR-mRNA co-expression analysis allowed us to identify changes in the miR-mRNA regulation that were able to distinguish tumors from familial and sporadic young BC patients non-carriers of BRCA mutations.