Role of Concomitant Triamcinolone Acetonide Injection in Small-Gauge Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Peel

Impact of intravitreal triamcinolone injection following epiretinal membrane peeling on ectopic inner foveal layer classification

PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (TA) administration after peeling of idiopathic epiretinal membranes (iERM) on both anatomical and visual outcomes, utilizing the ectopic inner foveal layer (EIFL) staging scheme.

METHODS

In this retrospective case-control study, we analyzed 43 eyes from 43 patients diagnosed with iERM between June 2019 and December 2021. All participants were categorized into the TA or control groups based on administering intravitreal TA injection following ERM peeling. We thoroughly reviewed the clinical data, including the preoperative and postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central foveal thickness (CFT), and macular cube volume (VOL), with ERM stages classified according to the EIFL staging scheme.

RESULTS

The study enrolled 22 eyes in the TA and 21 in the control groups. Following a mean follow-up period of 11.07 ± 2.02 months, noteworthy improvements in EIFL stages were observed in both cohorts (p < 0.01), but without significant distinctions between groups. In the TA group, 63.64% of eyes demonstrated improvements in EIFL stages, while the control group exhibited 76.19% (p = 0.37). At the final visit, both groups experienced a noteworthy reduction in the postoperative CFT and VOL (p < 0.05), coupled with significant improvement in BCVA (p < 0.01). No substantial differences appeared between the two groups concerning BCVA, CFT, and VOL (all p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that concurrent intravitreal TA injection following ERM removal did not provide additional benefits regarding anatomical and visual improvement in iERM cases classified as Stages 2 and 3.

Use of a dexamethasone implant to treat macular edema following pars plana vitrectomy and removal of the primary epiretinal membrane

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of an intravitreal dexamethasone (DEX) implant for the treatment of macular edema (ME) following pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) and removal of the primary epiretinal membrane (ERM) and to assess the impact of the integrity of the ellipsoid zone (EZ) and disorganization of the retinal inner layer (DRIL) grade on visual and anatomical outcomes.

METHODS

Forty-two pseudophakic patients who developed ME following PPV and removal of the primary stage 2-3 ERM were included. Patients were divided into two groups when ME was diagnosed via spectral domain optic coherence tomography (SD-OCT). In the DEX group (n = 22), DEX was implanted for the treatment of ME. In the control group (n = 20), only observation was conducted, without any treatment. The best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and macular thickness (MT) of the two groups were compared at baseline and 1, 6, and 12 months after DEX implantation. The effects of OCT parameters such as EZ integrity and DRIL grade were also evaluated in terms of decreases in MT and increases in VA in the treatment of ME with DEX implantation. Intraocular pressure (IOP), number of DEX implantations and adverse effects were also recorded.

RESULTS

While a statistically significant increase in the mean BCVA was observed in the DEX group (p < 0.001 at months 1, 6, and 12, respectively), no such increase was detected in the control group (p = 0.169, p = 0.065, and p = 0.058 at months 1, 6 and 12, respectively) compared with the baseline. A statistically significant decrease in the mean MT was observed in the DEX group (p  < 0.001 at months 1, 6, and 12); however, no significant difference was observed in the control group (p  = 0.081, p  = 0.065, and p  = 0.054 at months 1, 6 and 12, respectively) compared with the baseline. Significant differences were found between the two groups in terms of the increase in BCVA (p  < 0.01) and decrease in MT (p  < 0.01) at all visits, with the outcomes being more favorable in the DEX group. A statistically significant relationship was found between the increase in VA and EZ integrity and DRIL grade in both groups. Ten patients (45.4%) received two injections of DEX during the follow-up. An increase in IOP was observed in five patients (22.7%) who were treated with topical antiglaucomatous drops. No significant side effects were observed.

CONCLUSION

DEX implantation was found to be effective and safe for the treatment of ME following PPV and primary ERM removal, although some eyes may require repeated injections to achieve visual and anatomical success. Additionally, a relationship was found between EZ integrity, DRIL grade and visual-anatomical outcomes.

Evaluation of combined epiretinal membrane removal with intravitreal triamcinolone injection utilizing ectopic inner foveal layer staging scheme

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the macular morphological and visual outcomes of combined idiopathic epiretinal membrane (iERM) removal with triamcinolone acetonide (TA) injection based on consideration of the ectopic inner foveal layer (EIFL) staging scheme.

METHODS

Retrospective case-control study. The clinical data of 84 eyes of 84 patients who underwent vitrectomy for iERM between 2018 and 2022 were reviewed. The enrolled subjects were divided into the TA and non-TA groups. Fifty-one eyes received intravitreal TA injection following vitrectomy and ERM peeling (TA group), and 33 were only treated by standard vitrectomy and ERM peeling (non-TA group). Preoperative and postoperative EIFL stages, central foveal thickness (CFT), and best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) were compared between both groups.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 7.69 ± 3.68 months, both groups exhibited significant improvement in EIFL stages (P < 0.01), with no discernible advantage observed in the TA group. The TA and non-TA groups demonstrated improvement in the EIFL stages in 56.86 and 63.64% of eyes, respectively (P = 0.43). The CFT and BCVA significantly improved in both groups at the final visit (P < 0.01). However, CFT in the non-TA group displayed a more significant reduction during the follow-up (P < 0.03). Subgroup analysis revealed no significant differences in postoperative CFT and BCVA between the two groups in cases with or without continuous EIFL (P > 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate that combined intravitreal TA injection following ERM removal conferred no significant benefits in alleviating macular thickening or improving visual acuity in iERM.

Efficacy of Combined Vitrectomy with Intravitreal Corticosteroid Injection for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Removal on Anatomical and Functional Outcomes: A Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Macular edema can be a cause of visual loss in eyes undergoing vitrectomy with epiretinal membrane(ERM) peeling.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of combined vitrectomy with intravitreal corticosteroid injection for ERM.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic literature review by searching PubMed, Embase, and Medline up to December 2020 for studies that evaluated the effect of intravitreal corticosteroid injection during vitrectomy for ERM. Follow-up data on postoperative best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central macular thickness (CMT) were collected and pooled using the standard mean deviation (SMD) with the corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI). Heterogeneity was statistically quantified using I2 statistics, and a meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Eight studies provided data on a total sample of 443 eyes. The meta-analysis revealed that concomitant intravitreal corticosteroid administration during vitrectomy contributed to a significant reduction in CMT than vitrectomy alone at 3 months after operation (pooled SMD = -0.353; 95% CI, -0.594 to -0.111; p = 0.004). However, between the two groups, no significant difference was found in CMT reduction at 1 and 6 months after operation and in postoperative BCVA improvement at 1, 3, and 6 months after operation.

CONCLUSION

Combined treatment with vitrectomy and intravitreal corticosteroid injection may accelerate CMT reduction 3 months after ERM surgery. However, it did not result in a significant change in CMT and BCVA compared with vitrectomy alone at the end of follow-up.

Effect of Periocular Triamcinolone Acetonide on Prevention of Postsurgical Intraretinal Cystoid Changes after Vitrectomy with Membrane Peeling

BACKGROUND

Newly developed intraretinal cystoid changes after vitrectomy with membrane peeling for removal of epiretinal membranes have the potential to lead to worse postsurgical results compared to patients without. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the feasibility of additional periocular application of triamcinolone acetonide as a routine adjunct at the end of vitrectomy with membrane peeling, and to compare the presence of postsurgical intraretinal cystoid changes in the first 3 months after surgery among patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes to a historical group of patients that did not receive triamcinolone acetonide.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The medical records of 41 eyes of 41 patients that underwent 23 G or 25 G pars plana vitrectomy with membrane peeling for removal of epiretinal membranes and additional periocular triamcinolone acetonide application at the end of surgery were retrospectively reviewed. Optical coherence tomography findings during routine follow-ups at 3 - 5 days, 1 month, and 3 months and visual acuity at 3 months after surgery were evaluated and compared to preoperative findings. Furthermore, postsurgical intraocular pressure was assessed.

RESULTS

Periocular triamcinolone acetonide at the end of surgery was well tolerated among all patients. In total, 10% of patients had an increased intraocular pressure at least at one follow-up. Best-corrected visual acuity improved in 91% of patients with idiopathic epiretinal membranes with a mean improvement of + 3 ± 2 lines (Snellen) and was comparable to a historic group of patients (p = 0.307). Early transient macular edema could not be detected in any of the patients, while there were cases with this pathology in the historic group of patients, but neither occurrence of newly developed intraretinal cystoid changes nor macular thickness at 3 months after surgery were significantly different between patients with and without triamcinolone acetonide (p = 0.385 and p = 0.879).

CONCLUSIONS

Periocularly applied triamcinolone acetonide at the end of vitrectomy with membrane peeling was well tolerated and showed prevention of early transient macular edema but did not prevent the development of new postoperative intraretinal cystoid changes.

Pharmacotherapy as an adjunct to vitrectomy

Vitreoretinal surgery has advanced extensively from the first days of vitrectomy. During the last decade, new developments in intravitreal pharmacotherapy have created new opportunities to enhance the surgical outcomes of our patients. In this article, we review and discuss some of the supporting evidence of different pharmacotherapies that may be used as an adjunct to vitrectomy for select common etiologies. Triamcinolone acetonide, dexamethasone, and angiogenesis inhibitors are among the most commonly used drugs given their safety profile and proven efficacy. Other pharmaceuticals have also shown promising results in small studies. The adoption of individualized medical treatments prior, during, and after vitrectomy will continue to increase as new evidence supporting the benefit of pharmacotherapy as an adjunct to vitrectomy becomes available.

Treatment of Macular Edema after Pars Plana Vitrectomy for Idiopathic Epiretinal Membrane Using Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant: Long-Term Outcomes

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy and safety of intravitreal dexamethasone implant for the treatment of macular edema after pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) for epiretinal membrane (ERM) removal.

METHODS

This prospective study included 27 patients who were diagnosed with macular edema after PPV for ERM removal and who were treated with either intravitreal dexamethasone implant (n = 15) or were observed without intervention (n = 12). Changes in best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) and central retinal thickness (CRT) were assessed 1, 6, and 12 months -after treatment.

RESULTS

Patients treated with intravitreal dexamethasone implant showed significant improvement in BCVA and reduction in CRT at months 1, 6, and 12 after treatment, while patients in the control group showed improvement that did not reach statistical significance. The two groups differed significantly in terms of BCVA and CRT at all time points of the follow-up period, in favor of the dexamethasone implant group. Eighty percent of the patients treated with intravitreal dexamethasone needed only one implant until month 12, while no serious adverse events were noticed in any group.

CONCLUSIONS

Intravitreal dexamethasone implant was found to be effective and safe for the treatment of macular edema after PPV for ERM removal.

Surgical treatment for diabetic vitreoretinal diseases: a review

Over the past four decades, advancements in surgical instrumentations and techniques have significantly improved the postoperative anatomical and visual outcomes of patients with various diabetic vitreoretinal diseases. In particular, surgical interventions for previously serious and untreatable blinding proliferative diabetic retinopathy can now be performed, with much better results. The advents of micro incisional vitrectomy system with better visualization system like binocular indirect ophthalmomicroscope and state-of-the-art instrumentation revolutionized the era of diabetic vitrectomy. High-speed vitrectors, finer instruments, chromo-assisted vitrectomy and use of anti-vascular endothelial growth factors not only change the paradigm but also help achieve much better outcome after diabetic vitrectomies. In this review, we will discuss and summarize the indications, surgical considerations, surgical techniques, potential complications and outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery for diabetic eye diseases.