Optimizations for the Electrically-Evoked Stapedial Reflex Threshold Measurement in Cochlear Implant Recipients

Is the spread of excitation different between adults and children cochlear implants users?

PURPOSE

While cochlea is adult size at birth, etiologies and bone density may differ between children and adults. Differences in neural response thresholds (tNRT) and the spread of excitation (SOE) width may impact the use of artificial intelligence algorithms in speech processor fitting.

AIM

To identify whether neural response telemetry threshold and spread of excitation width are similar in adults and children.

METHODS

Retrospective cross-sectional study approved by the Ethical Board. Intraoperative tNRT and SOE recordings of consecutive cochlear implant surgeries in adults and children implanted with Cochlear devices (Cochlear™, Australia) were selected. SOE was recorded on electrode 11 (or adjacent, corresponding to the medial region of the cochlea) through the standard forward-masking technique in Custom Sound EP software, which provides SOE width in millimeters. Statistical comparison between adults and children was performed using the Mann-Whitney test (p ≤ 0.05).

RESULTS

Of 1282 recordings of intraoperative evaluations, 414 measurements were selected from children and adults. Despite the tNRT being similar between adults and children, SOE width was significantly different, with lower values in children with perimodiolar arrays. Besides, it was observed that there is a difference in the electrode where the SOE function peak occurred, more frequently shifted to electrode 12 in adults implanted. In straight arrays, there was no difference in any of the parameters analyzed on electrode 11.

CONCLUSION

Although eCAP thresholds are similar, SOE measurements differ between adults and children in perimodiolar electrodes.

Comparison of electrically evoked stapedial reflexes in patients with cochlear implants surgically implanted using Veria and posterior tympanotomy approaches

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to compare ipsilateral and contralateral electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds in children with a unilateral cochlear implant surgically implanted either through Veria or posterior tympanotomy approaches.

METHODS

Forty-nine children using cochlear implants were studied, of whom 27 underwent the Veria approach and 22 underwent the posterior tympanotomy approach. The electrically evoked stapedius reflex thresholds were measured ipsilaterally and contralaterally by stimulating four equally spaced electrodes.

RESULTS

The ipsilateral electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold was absent in all four electrodes in the children implanted using the Veria approach. However, the ipsilateral electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold was present in 70 per cent of the children implanted using the posterior tympanotomy approach. The contralateral electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold was present in most of the children for both surgical approaches.

CONCLUSION

The presence of the ipsilateral electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold varies depending on the surgical technique used for cochlear implantation. However, contralateral reflexes are present in the majority of children using cochlear implants, irrespective of the surgical approach.

Cochlear Implant Upper Stimulation Levels: eSRT vs. Loudness Scaling

OBJECTIVE

To assess the difference in speech recognition and sound quality between programming upper stimulation levels using behavioral measures (loudness scaling) and electrically evoked stapedial reflex thresholds (eSRTs).

STUDY DESIGN

Double-blinded acute comparison study.

SETTING

Cochlear implant (CI) program at a tertiary medical center.

PATIENTS

Eighteen adult (mean age = 60 years) CI users and 20 ears.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Speech recognition scores and sound quality ratings.

RESULTS

Mean word and sentence in noise recognition scores were 8 and 9 percentage points higher, respectively, for the eSRT-based map. The sound quality rating was 1.4 points higher for the eSRT-based map. Sixteen out of 20 participants preferred the eSRT-based map.

CONCLUSIONS

Study results show significantly higher speech recognition and more favorable sound quality using an eSRT-based map compared with a loudness-scaling map using a double-blinded testing approach. Additionally, results may be understated as 18 of 20 ears had eSRTs measured before study enrollment. Results underscore the importance of incorporating eSRTs into standard clinical practice to promote best outcomes for CI recipients.

Stapedius reflex thresholds obtained in a free sound field as an indicator for over- and understimulation in cochlear implant listeners

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study was to determine open field stapedius reflex thresholds (oSRTs) in CI patients with fittings based on subjective loudness ratings. A further objective was to compare these oSRTs and those of eSRT-based fittings that are similar to the oSRTs of normal hearing.

DESIGN

Impedance measurements of the ear drum were taken while subjects were wearing their audio processors. The stapedius reflex was elicited by electrical stimulation transmitted through the activated CI system in response to an acoustic stimulus presented in the free sound field.

STUDY SAMPLE

Subjects were 50 experienced CI users (n = 57 ears) with CI fittings based on subjective loudness scaling.

RESULTS

A reference range for the oSRTs was defined that was identified in CI patients with eSRT-based fittings. Sound levels for stapedius reflex detection were inside the reference target range in 70% of the cases, below the reference range (i.e. down to 40 dB HL) in 20% of the cases, and above the reference range in 10% of the cases.

CONCLUSION

Stapedius reflex detection in a free sound field may help detect fittings with too high or too low stimulation levels that might reduce audiological performance.

Automated Adaptive Wideband Acoustic Stapedius Reflex Thresholds in Adults With Normal Hearing and Sensorineural Hearing Loss

OBJECTIVES

This study compared the measurement of the acoustic stapedius reflex threshold (ART) obtained using a traditional method with that obtained using an automated adaptive wideband (AAW) method. Participants included three groups of adults with normal hearing (NH), mild sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), or moderate SNHL. The purpose of the study was to compare ARTs for the three groups and to determine which method had the best performance in detecting SNHL.

DESIGN

Ipsilateral and contralateral ARTs were obtained using 0.5, 1, and 2 kHz tonal activators, and broadband noise (BBN) activators on a traditional admittance system (Clinical) at tympanometric peak pressures (TPP) and on an experimental wideband system using an AAW method at both ambient pressure and TPP. ART data previously reported for 39 NH adults with a mean age of 47.7 years were compared with data for 25 participants with mild SNHL with a mean age of 63.8 years, and 20 participants with moderate SNHL with a mean age of 65.7 years. Differences in ARTs between the normal-hearing and SNHL groups for the three methods were examined using a General Linear Model Repeated-Measures test. A receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis was also used to determine the ability of an ART test to detect SNHL.

RESULTS

For the 0.5 kHz activator condition, there were no significant group mean differences in ART between NH and SNHL groups for either ipsilateral or contralateral activator presentation modes for the Clinical or AAW methods. There were significant group mean differences for the 1 and 2 kHz tonal activators and BBN activator for both ipsilateral and contralateral modes with greater differences in ART between groups for the AAW method than the Clinical method. In these conditions, the mean ART was lower for the AAW tests relative to the Clinical test. The greatest difference between groups was for the ipsilateral AAW tests for the comparison of NH with moderate SNHL for the BBN activator. This difference was approximately 20 dB for the AAW tests and 8 dB for the Clinical test. The ROC analysis showed that the area under the ROC curve (AUC) increased with the frequency of the activator stimulus and with the degree of hearing loss and was maximal for the BBN activator for both the AAW and Clinical methods for both ipsilateral and contralateral presentations.

CONCLUSIONS

For ipsilateral and contralateral ART tests for activator frequencies above 0.5 kHz and BBN, listeners with SNHL generally had elevated ARTs compared with those with NH. The AAW method resulted in greater differences between SNHL groups and NH than the Clinical method. The AUC for detecting SNHL also increased with activator frequency and degree of hearing loss and was greatest for the BBN activator for the AAW method in both the ambient and TPP conditions. The results are encouraging for the use of an AAW ART method for the assessment of individuals with SNHL.

Evaluation of the Electrically-Evoked Stapedial Reflex Threshold in Pediatric Cochlear Implant Users with High-Frequency Probe Tones

Introduction Measurement of the electrically-evoked stapedial reflex threshold (ESRT) is an objective tool used to set the comfort levels in pediatric cochlear implant (PCI) users. The levels of ESRT have a strong correlation with comfort levels. However, the clinical utility of ESRT is limited because the ESRT response is not observed in all cochlear implant users.

Objective To assess the effects of probe-tone frequency on ESRT and its relationship with the behavioral comfort levels in PCI users.

Methods A total of 14 PCI users aged between 5 and 8 years participated in the study. The ESRT levels were measured using high-frequency probe tones (678 Hz and 1,000 Hz), and the default 226 Hz probe tone. The ESRT was measured with single-electrode stimulation across the three electrode locations (basal [E01]; middle [E11]; and apical [E22]). The ESRT levels measured with different probe tone frequencies were compared with the behavioral comfort levels.

Results The mean ESRT levels using 1,000Hz and 678 Hz were lower than those measured using 226 Hz, but there was no main effect of probe-tone frequency (p > 0.05). A significantly high incidence of successful ESRT measurements occurred with higher-frequency probe tone (p < 0.039). Additionally, ESRT using higher probe tones significantly correlated with comfort levels.

Conclusion The ESRT with higher probe tones was correlated with behavioral comfort levels and increased the success rate of the measurements. Higher-frequency probe tones may be useful whenever ESRT with 226 Hz is not measurable.

The optimal probe tone frequency for eSRT measurements at individual electrodes in children with cochlear implants

BACKGROUND

Higher probe tone frequencies have been shown to increase the elicitation rates in electrically evoked stapedius reflex threshold (eSRT) measurements.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the optimal probe tone frequency for contralateral eSRT measurements at individual electrodes in children with unilateral cochlear implants and to assess the relationship between eSRTs for this frequency and most comfortable levels (M-levels).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Contralateral eSRT measurements with three probe tone frequencies (226, 678, and 1000 Hz) at individual electrodes were performed on 26 paediatric Advanced Bionics cochlear implant recipients.

RESULTS

The elicitation rates of eSRTs for 226, 678, and 1000 Hz probe tones were 73.08% (57/78), 88.46% (69/78), and 88.46% (69/78), respectively. The average eSRT for the 1000 Hz probe tone was significantly lower than those for 226 and 678 Hz probe tones (p<.001 and p=.009, respectively). ESRTs for the 1000 Hz probe tone and M-levels were significantly correlated at all tested electrodes (all p<.001).

CONCLUSIONS AND SIGNIFICANCE

The optimal probe tone frequency for contralateral eSRT measurement at individual electrodes in children with unilateral cochlear implants is 1000 Hz. ESRTs for the 1000 Hz probe tone are significantly correlated with M-levels and can be used to guide the M-levels setting in these children.

Wideband Acoustic Immittance in Cochlear Implant Recipients: Reflectance and Stapedial Reflexes

OBJECTIVES

to characterize differences in wideband power reflectance for ears with and without cochlear implants (CIs), to describe electrically evoked stapedial reflex (eSR)-induced changes in reflectance, and to evaluate the benefit of a broadband probe for reflex threshold determination for CI recipients. It was hypothesized that reflectance patterns in ears with CIs would be consistent with increased middle ear stiffness and that reflex thresholds measured with a broadband probe would be lower compared with thresholds obtained with a single-frequency probe.

DESIGN

Eleven CI recipients participated in both wideband reflectance and eSR testing. Ipsilateral reflexes were measured with three probes: a broadband chirp (swept from 200 to 8000 Hz), a 226 Hz tone, and a 678 Hz tone. Wideband reflectance measures acquired from 28 adults without CIs and with normal middle ear function served as a normative data set for comparison.

RESULTS

Considering the group data, average reflectance was significantly greater for ears with CIs across 250 to 891 Hz and 4238 to 4490 Hz compared with the normative data set, although individual reflectance curves were variable. Some CI recipients also had low 226 Hz admittance, which contributed to the group finding, considering the control group had clinically normal 226 Hz admittance by design. Electrically evoked stapedial reflexes were measurable in nine of 14 ears (64.3%) and in 24 of 46 electrodes (52.5%) tested. Reflex-induced changes in reflectance patterns were unique to the participant/ear, but similar across activators (electrodes) within a given ear. In addition, reflectance values at or above 1000 Hz were affected most by activating the stapedial reflex, even in ears with clinically normal 226 Hz admittance. This is a higher-frequency range than has been reported for acoustically evoked reflex-induced reflectance changes and is consistent with increased middle ear stiffness at rest. Electrically evoked reflexes could be measured more often with the 678 Hz or the broadband probe compared with the 226 Hz probe tone. Although reflex thresholds were lower with the broadband probe compared with the 678 Hz probe in 16 of 24 conditions, this was not a statistically significant finding (Wilcoxon signed-rank test; p = 0.072).

CONCLUSIONS

The applications of wideband acoustic immittance measurements (reflectance and reflexes) should also be considered for ears with CIs. Further work is needed to describe changes across time in ears with CIs to more fully understand the reflectance pattern indicating increased middle ear stiffness and to optimize measuring eSRs with a broadband probe.

Effect of Number of Electrodes Used to Elicit Electrical Stapedius Reflex Thresholds in Cochlear Implants

INTRODUCTION

When mapping cochlear implant (CI) patients with limited reporting abilities, the lowest electrical stimulus level that produces a stapedial reflex (i.e., the electrical stapedius reflex threshold [eSRT]) can be measured to estimate the upper bound of stimulation on individual or a subset of CI electrodes. However, eSRTs measured for individual electrodes or a subset of electrodes cannot be used to predict the global adjustment of electrical stimulation levels needed to achieve comfortable loudness sensations that can be readily used in a speech coding strategy. In the present study, eSRTs were measured for 1-, 4-, and 15-electrode stimulation to (1) determine changes in eSRT levels as a function of the electrode stimulation mode and (2) determine which stimulation mode eSRT levels best approximate comfortable loudness levels from patients' clinical maps.

METHODS

eSRTs were measured with the 3 different electrical stimulation configurations in 9 CI patients and compared with behaviorally measured, comfortable loudness levels or M-levels from patients' clinical maps.

RESULTS

A linear, mixed-effects, repeated-measures analysis revealed significant differences (p < 0.01) between eSRTs measured as a function of the stimulation mode. No significant differences (p = 0.059) were measured between 15-electrode eSRTs and M-levels from patients' clinical maps. The eSRTs measured for 1- and 4-electrode stimulation differed significantly (p < 0.05) from the M-levels on the corresponding electrodes from the patients' clinical map.

CONCLUSION

eSRT profiles based on 1- or 4-electrode stimulation can be used to determine comfortable loudness level on either individual or a subset of electrodes, and 15-electrode eSRT profiles can be used to determine the upper bound of electrical stimulation that can be used in a speech coding strategy.

The Long-Term Stability of the Electrical Stapedial Reflex Threshold

OBJECTIVES

To 1) describe changes in the electrical stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT), within and across patients over time and 2) to identify the clinical relationship between eSRT and an individual's upper limit of loudness.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective chart review and analysis using a multilevel modeling approach to describe changes in eSRT over time.

SETTING

Secondary care center.

PATIENTS

Two-hundred five cochlear implant recipients treated at the cochlear implant center during a 3-year time period.

INTERVENTION(S)

Cochlear implantation, eSRT testing, and, electrical upper limits of loudness.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

The eSRT over multiple appointments and the cochlear implant recipients' final upper limits of loudness.

RESULTS

Analysis of the eSRT testing indicated stability over time; no global trend was seen in trajectory across the population, b = -0.010, p = 0.899. The relationship between eSRT and user upper limits of loudness revealed a mean decrease of 19.47, units for manufacturer 1, 30.53 units for manufacturer 2, and 0.7 units for manufacturer 3.

CONCLUSION

Electrical stapedial reflex thresholds remain consistent for individual subjects over time with implant experience being the only variable correlated with eSRT stability (increase in 5% of one standard deviation with each year of experience). In addition, a clinical relationship between eSRT and behaviorally set upper limits of loudness was identified for all three cochlear implant manufacturers available in the United States.

Audiologists' preferences in programming cochlear implants: A preliminary report

Background: There is little data available addressing how clinical audiologists handle cochlear implant (CI) programming between device manufacturers and make decisions on related services, particularly in the United States. Objectives: This study sought to understand the techniques and settings professionals use with their patients, how they approach bimodal fitting, which tests they use to evaluate patient and device performance, and their overall preferences of (re)habilitative options. Methods: A questionnaire was developed and distributed to CI audiologists throughout the United States electronically. Results: All respondents reported either always or almost always using Cochlear's default signal processing strategy in contrast to the 64% reported for Med-El and 40% for Advanced Bionics. A trend of less use of electrically evoked stapedial reflex threshold (eSRT) than electrically evoked compound action potentials (eCAP) for objective measures was revealed. Higher likelihood of performing speech recognition tests in quiet than in noise was revealed. Preferences for bimodal fitting trend toward using a partner company's hearing aid, although preferences were comparable in adopting four types of hearing aid formulas surveyed in the questionnaire. Conclusions: These data confirm high variability among audiologists' CI programming practices, and documenting these differences is an important step to understanding how to best treat patients.

Cochlear Implantation for Children and Adults with Severe-to-Profound Hearing Loss

Cochlear implants (CIs) have proven to be a useful treatment option for individuals with severe-to-profound hearing loss by providing improved access to one's surrounding auditory environment. CIs differ from traditional acoustic amplification by providing information to the auditory system via electrical stimulation. Both postlingually deafened adults and prelingually deafened children can benefit from a CI; however, outcomes with a CI can vary. Numerous factors can impact performance outcomes with a CI. It is important for the audiologist to understand what factors might play a role and impact performance outcomes with a CI so that they can effectively counsel the recipient and their family, as well as establish appropriate and realistic expectations with a CI. This review article will discuss the CI candidacy process, CI programming and postoperative follow-up care, as well as considerations across the lifespan that may affect performance outcomes with a CI.