Postlingually Deafened Adult Cochlear Implant Users With Prolonged Recovery From Neural Adaptation at the Level of the Auditory Nerve Tend to Have Poorer Speech Perception Performance

A new method for removing artifacts from recordings of the electrically evoked compound action potential: Single-pulse stimulation

This report presents a new method for removing electrical artifact contamination from the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) evoked by single cathodic-leading, biphasic-pulse stimulation. The development of the new method is motivated by results recorded in human cochlear implant (CI) users showing that the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking artifact rejection technique is violated in up to 45% of cases tested at high stimulation levels when using default stimulation parameters. Subsequently, the new method developed based on the discovery that a hyperbola best characterizes the artifacts created during stimulation and recording is described. The eCAP waveforms obtained using the new method are compared to those recorded using the classic forward masking technique. The results show that eCAP waveforms obtained using both methods are comparable when the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking technique is met. In contrast, eCAP amplitudes obtained using the two methods are significantly different when the fundamental assumption of the classic forward masking technique is violated, with greater differences in the eCAP amplitude for greater assumption violations. The new method also has excellent test-retest reliability (Intraclass correlation > 0.98). Overall, the new method is a viable alternative to the classic forward masking technique for obtaining artifact-free eCAPs evoked by single-pulse stimulation in CI users.

The Relationship Between Cochlear Implant Speech Perception Outcomes and Electrophysiological Measures of the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential

OBJECTIVE

This study assessed the relationship between electrophysiological measures of the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) and speech perception scores measured in quiet and in noise in postlingually deafened adult cochlear implant (CI) users. It tested the hypothesis that how well the auditory nerve (AN) responds to electrical stimulation is important for speech perception with a CI in challenging listening conditions.

DESIGN

Study participants included 24 postlingually deafened adult CI users. All participants used Cochlear Nucleus CIs in their test ears. In each participant, eCAPs were measured at multiple electrode locations in response to single-pulse, paired-pulse, and pulse-train stimuli. Independent variables included six metrics calculated from the eCAP recordings: the electrode-neuron interface (ENI) index, the neural adaptation (NA) ratio, NA speed, the adaptation recovery (AR) ratio, AR speed, and the amplitude modulation (AM) ratio. The ENI index quantified the effectiveness of the CI electrodes in stimulating the targeted AN fibers. The NA ratio indicated the amount of NA at the AN caused by a train of constant-amplitude pulses. NA speed was defined as the speed/rate of NA. The AR ratio estimated the amount of recovery from NA at a fixed time point after the cessation of pulse-train stimulation. AR speed referred to the speed of recovery from NA caused by previous pulse-train stimulation. The AM ratio provided a measure of AN sensitivity to AM cues. Participants' speech perception scores were measured using Consonant-Nucleus-Consonant (CNC) word lists and AzBio sentences presented in quiet, as well as in noise at signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) of +10 and +5 dB. Predictive models were created for each speech measure to identify eCAP metrics with meaningful predictive power.

RESULTS

The ENI index and AR speed individually explained at least 10% of the variance in most of the speech perception scores measured in this study, while the NA ratio, NA speed, the AR ratio, and the AM ratio did not. The ENI index was identified as the only eCAP metric that had unique predictive power for each of the speech test results. The amount of variance in speech perception scores (both CNC words and AzBio sentences) explained by the eCAP metrics increased with increased difficulty under the listening condition. Over half of the variance in speech perception scores measured in +5 dB SNR noise (both CNC words and AzBio sentences) was explained by a model with only three eCAP metrics: the ENI index, NA speed, and AR speed.

CONCLUSIONS

Of the six electrophysiological measures assessed in this study, the ENI index is the most informative predictor for speech perception performance in CI users. In agreement with the tested hypothesis, the response characteristics of the AN to electrical stimulation are more important for speech perception with a CI in noise than they are in quiet.

Electrically evoked compound action potentials in cochlear implant users with preoperative residual hearing

Introduction

Residual hearing in cochlear implant (CI) candidates requires the functional integrity of the nerve in particular regions of the cochlea. Nerve activity can be elicited as electrically evoked compound action potentials (ECAP) after cochlear implantation. We hypothesize that ECAP thresholds depend on preoperative residual hearing ability.

Materials and methods

In a retrospective study, we analyzed 84 adult cochlear implant users who had received a Nucleus® CI632 Slim Modiolar Electrode and who preoperatively had had residual hearing. Inclusion criteria were severe to profound hearing loss with preoperative measurable hearing in the ear to receive the implant, postlingual hearing loss, German as native language and correct placement of the electrode, inserted completely into the scala tympani. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) was recorded intraoperatively. The angular insertion was measured for each electrode contact from postoperative computed tomography to estimate the corresponding spiral ganglion frequency. Pure-tone audiometry and allocated ECAP thresholds were tested to investigate possible correlation.

Results

The average of hearing thresholds, tested at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (4FPTA) was 82 ± 18 (range 47-129) dB HL. The success rate for recording ECAP thresholds was 96.9%. For all comparable pure-tone frequencies (1, 2, 4, and 8 kHz), there was significant correlation between preoperative hearing levels and intraoperative ECAP thresholds (p < 0.001). Higher hearing thresholds are associated with increased ECAP thresholds.

Conclusion

In CI candidates with adequate residual hearing, intraoperative electrophysiological measurement records lower thresholds. This outcome may be explained by the neural survival density of the peripheral system, with less neural degeneration.

Responsiveness of the electrically stimulated cochlear nerve in patients with a missense variant in ACTG1: Preliminary Results

This preliminary study identified a missense variant in ACTG1 (NM_001614.5) in a family with autosomal dominant non-syndromic hearing loss (ADNSHL). The responsiveness of the electrically-stimulated cochlear nerve (CN) in two implanted participants with this missense change was also evaluated and reported. Genetic testing was done using a custom capture panel (MiamiOtoGenes) and whole exome sequencing. The responsiveness of the electrically-stimulated CN was evaluated in two members of this family (G1 and G4) using the electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP). eCAP results from these two participants were compared with those measured three implanted patient populations: children with cochlear nerve deficiency, children with idiopathic hearing loss and normal-sized cochlear nerves, and postligually deafened adults. Sequencing of ACTG1 identified a missense c.737A>T (p. Gln246Leu) variant in ACTG1 (NM_001614.5) which is most likely the genetic cause of ADNSHL in this family. eCAP results measured in these two participants showed substantial variations. The results indicated the missense c.737A>T (p. Gln246Leu) variant in ACTG1 (NM_001614.5) co-segregated with hearing loss in this family. The responsiveness of the electrically-stimulated CN can vary among patients with the same genetic variants, which suggests the importance of evaluating the functional status of the CN for individual CI patients.