Multiple Auditory Steady State Responses (80-101 Hz): Effects of Ear, Gender, Handedness, Intensity and Modulation Rate

Feasibility of Diagnosing Dead Regions Using Auditory Steady-State Responses to an Exponentially Amplitude Modulated Tone in Threshold Equalizing Notched Noise, Assessed Using Normal-Hearing Participants

The aim of this study was to assess feasibility of using electrophysiological auditory steady-state response (ASSR) masking for detecting dead regions (DRs). Fifteen normally hearing adults were tested using behavioral and electrophysiological tasks. In the electrophysiological task, ASSRs were recorded to a 2 kHz exponentially amplitude-modulated tone (AM2) presented within a notched threshold equalizing noise (TEN) whose center frequency (CFNOTCH) varied. We hypothesized that, in the absence of DRs, ASSR amplitudes would be largest for CFNOTCH at/or near the signal frequency. In the presence of a DR at the signal frequency, the largest ASSR amplitude would occur at a frequency (fmax) far away from the signal frequency. The AM2 and the TEN were presented at 60 and 75 dB SPL, respectively. In the behavioral task, for the same maskers as above, the masker level at which an AM and a pure tone could just be distinguished, denoted AM2ML, was determined, for low (10 dB above absolute AM2 threshold) and high (60 dB SPL) signal levels. We also hypothesized that the value of fmax would be similar for both techniques. The ASSR fmax values obtained from grand average ASSR amplitudes, but not from individual amplitudes, were consistent with our hypotheses. The agreement between the behavioral fmax and ASSR fmax was poor. The within-session ASSR-amplitude repeatability was good for AM2 alone, but poor for AM2 in notched TEN. The ASSR-amplitude variability between and within participants seems to be a major roadblock to developing our approach into an effective DR detection method.

Fundamental frequency-dependent changes in vowel-evoked envelope following responses

Scalp-recorded envelope following responses (EFRs) provide a non-invasive method to assess the encoding of the fundamental frequency (f₀) of voice that is important for speech understanding. It is well-known that EFRs are influenced by voice f₀. However, this effect of f₀ has not been examined independent of concomitant changes in spectra or neural generators. We evaluated the effect of voice f₀ on EFRs while controlling for vowel formant characteristics and potentially avoiding significant changes in dominant neural generators using a small f₀ range. EFRs were elicited by a male-spoken vowel /u/ (average f₀ = 100.4 Hz) and its lowered f₀ version (average f₀ = 91.9 Hz) with closely matched formant characteristics. Vowels were presented to each ear of 17 young adults with normal hearing. EFRs were simultaneously recorded between the vertex and the nape, and the vertex and the ipsilateral mastoid-the two most common electrode montages used for EFRs. Our results indicate that when vowel formant characteristics are matched, an increase in f₀ by 8.5 Hz reduces EFR amplitude by 25 nV, phase coherence by 0.05 and signal-to-noise ratio by 3.5 dB, on average. The reduction in EFR characteristics was similar across ears of stimulation and the two montages used. These findings will help parse the influence of f₀ or stimulus spectra on EFRs when both co-vary.

Characterization of interstimulus interaction in the multiple auditory steady-state responses at high sound levels

Multiple auditory steady-state response (MASSR) is recommended to estimate hearing thresholds in difficult-to-test individuals. The multiple stimuli that evoke MASSR may present an interstimulus interaction (ISI) that is able to distort the generation of responses. No consensus exists on the effects of the ISI in MASSR when dealing with high sound level stimuli or cases of sensorineural hearing loss. This study investigated the effects of ISI on the amplitude and detectability of auditory steady-state responses, with a focus at and above 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Normal hearing (NH) and sensorineural hearing impaired (SNHI) adults were tested with different stimulus types [amplitude modulation (AM) One octave chirp (OC), and a weighted OC (WOC)], stimulus levels, and modalities (single or multiple stimuli). ISI typically attenuated response amplitude of a control stimulus caused by an interference stimulus one octave above the control stimulus. At and above 80 dB SPL, attenuations of around 50% decreased the number of detectable responses near SNHI thresholds, especially for OC and WOC. AM stimuli obtained a higher detection rate than OC and WOC when presented 10 dB above the behavioral hearing threshold of SNHI participants. Using OC in MASSR when assessing elevated thresholds might diminish accuracy on threshold estimation, and extend test duration.

Noise-induced enhancement of envelope following responses in normal-hearing adults

Measures of signal-in-noise neural encoding may improve understanding of the hearing-in-noise difficulties experienced by many individuals in everyday life. Usually noise results in weaker envelope following responses (EFRs); however, some studies demonstrate EFR enhancements. This experiment tested whether noise-induced enhancements in EFRs are demonstrated with simple 500- and 1000-Hz pure tones amplitude modulated at 110 Hz. Most of the 12 young normal-hearing participants demonstrated enhanced encoding of the 110-Hz fundamental in a noise background compared to quiet; in contrast, responses at the harmonics were decreased in noise relative to quiet conditions. Possible mechanisms of such an enhancement are discussed.

Validity of correction factors applied to auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs) in normal hearing adults in chartr EP system

OBJECTIVES

Even though many patients undergoing auditory steady-state response (ASSR) testing have some degree of hearing loss, some have normal hearing and ASSR often overestimates the behavioral thresholds in this group. In most commercial ASSR systems such as Chartr EP, a default correction factor is applied to compensate for this difference. Little is known, however, as how the correction factor compensates for the difference between ASSR and pure tone audiometry (PTA) thresholds as a function of carrier or modulation frequency (MF) in a commercial ASSR system. Our goal is to evaluate this relationship.

METHODS

Twenty-four normal hearing adults were examined for both PTA and ASSR (Chartr EP system, GN Otometrics). ASSR thresholds were obtained at three MFs (20, 40, and 80 Hz). The difference scores were obtained by subtracting PTA from ASSR thresholds at each frequency for each subject. The corrected ASSR thresholds, then, were compared with the PTA thresholds across MFs and carrier frequencies.

RESULTS

The default correction factors in the ASSR equipment differed significantly from the difference scores at all MFs and carrier frequencies (n = 24, p < 0.005). The correlation between corrected ASSR and PTA thresholds at most MFs and carrier frequencies were medium to poor.

CONCLUSIONS

At most MFs and carrier frequencies, the default correction factors defined by the manufacturer do not compensate for the difference between ASSR and PTA thresholds in normal hearing adults. The use of the default correction factors in Chartr EP system for the normal hearing adults needs special considerations.

Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part I: Normal Hearing

Psychophysical procedures are used to balance loudness across the ears. However, they can be difficult and require active cooperation. We investigated whether 40-Hz auditory steady-state response (ASSR) amplitudes can be used to objectively estimate the balanced loudness across the ears for a group of young, normal-hearing participants. The 40-Hz ASSRs were recorded using monaural stimuli with carrier frequencies of 500, 1000, or 2000 Hz over a range of levels between 40 and 80 dB SPL. Behavioral loudness balancing was performed for at least one reference level of the left ear. ASSR amplitude growth functions were listener dependent, but median across-ear ratios in ASSR amplitudes were close to 1. The differences between the ASSR-predicted balanced levels and the behaviorally found balanced levels were smaller than 5 dB in 59% of cases and smaller than 10 dB in 85% of cases. The differences between the ASSR-predicted balanced levels and the reference levels were smaller than 5 dB in 54% of cases and smaller than 10 dB in 87% of cases. No clear hemispheric lateralization was found for 40-Hz ASSRs, with the exception of responses evoked by stimulus levels of 40 to 60 dB SPL at 2000 Hz.

Effects of degree and symmetricity of bilateral spectral smearing, carrier frequency, and subject sex on amplitude of evoked auditory steady-state response signal

The characteristics of an auditory steady-state response (ASSR) signal can be affected by the pathophysiological statuses of the left and right ears, such as a smeared sensation by native spectral smearing owing to sensorineural hearing impairment, because they can affect the perception of the stimulus, the degree of concentration on the stimulus and comfort in concentration. However, to date, few studies have examined the effects of such smeared sensations on the amplitude of the evoked ASSR signal. In this study, we synthesized various auditory stimuli with different degrees of spectral smearing using a hearing loss simulator to match the age of participant groups with different degrees of spectral smearing. We then performed three subjective tests, representing symmetric and asymmetric bilateral spectral smearing, with 16 normal-hearing individuals to observe the effects of the severity and symmetricity of bilateral spectral smearing, the value of the carrier frequency of auditory stimuli, and the sex of the individual on the amplitude in evoked ASSR signals. The experimental results demonstrated the following: (1) the application of spectral smearing to normal sounds may result in amplitude-reduced ASSR signals, (2) the effect of spectral smearing on the amplitude of the ASSR signals is most significant when the degrees of bilateral spectral smearing are asymmetric, (3) the selection of carrier frequency in an auditory stimulus can affect the amplitude of evoked ASSR signals regardless of the degree of spectral smearing, and (4) the sex of the individual can affect the amplitude of the evoked ASSR signal in various test conditions. The results of this study can help estimate the effects of smeared sensation by spectral smearing owing to sensorineural hearing impairment on the amplitude of evoked ASSR signals.

Mode of recording and modulation frequency effects of auditory steady state response thresholds

INTRODUCTION

The performance of auditory steady state response (ASSR) in threshold testing when recorded ipsilaterally and contralaterally, as well as at low and high modulation frequencies (MFs), has not been systematically studied.

OBJECTIVE

To verify the influences of mode of recording (ipsilateral vs. contralateral) and modulation frequency (40Hz vs. 90Hz) on ASSR thresholds.

METHODS

Fifteen female and 14 male subjects (aged 18-30 years) with normal hearing bilaterally were studied. Narrow-band CE-chirp^® stimuli (centerd at 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000Hz) modulated at 40 and 90Hz MFs were presented to the participants' right ear. The ASSR thresholds were then recorded at each test frequency in both ipsilateral and contralateral channels.

RESULTS

Due to pronounced interaction effects between mode of recording and MF (p<0.05 by two-way repeated measures ANOVA), mean ASSR thresholds were then compared among four conditions (ipsi-40Hz, ipsi-90Hz, contra-40Hz, and contra-90Hz) using one-way repeated measures ANOVA. At the 500 and 1000Hz test frequencies, contra-40Hz condition produced the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. In contrast, at high frequencies (2000 and 4000Hz), ipsi-90Hz condition revealed the lowest mean ASSR thresholds. At most test frequencies, contra-90Hz produced the highest mean ASSR thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on the findings, the present study recommends two different protocols for an optimum threshold testing with ASSR, at least when testing young adults. This includes the use of contra-40Hz recording mode due to its promising performance in hearing threshold estimation.

Evaluation of noise-induced hearing loss by auditory steady-state and auditory brainstem-evoked responses

OBJECTIVES

Noise-induced hearing loss (NIHL) may result from occupational noise exposures and is considered as an 'Occupational Disease'; therefore, it is compensable. To verify the existence and severity of the work-related hearing loss, there is a need of an objective, reliable auditory measure in cases of arbitration of financial disputes to resolve any medicolegal aspects. The objective of the study was to compare between the ABR and ASSR for predicting the behavioural threshold in subjects with normal hearing or NIHL.

DESIGN

The study included 82 subjects regularly exposed to high levels of occupational noise, with normal hearing and NIHL. ABR to clicks and to tone bursts were recorded followed by multiple-frequency ASSR. Physiological and behavioural thresholds were compared for specific frequencies (1000, 2000 Hz) and average of high-frequency range (2000 and 4000 Hz). In addition, Pearson correlations and the specificity and sensitivity of each measure were also calculated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

RESULTS

In the NIHL group, there was a significantly smaller difference between the behavioural threshold and click-ABR than the ASSR in high-frequency range. Pearson correlations were significantly higher for click-ABR. Analysis of specific frequencies yielded a smaller difference between behavioural and ASSR than tone-burst-ABR thresholds, with a slightly better correlation for ASSR than tone-burst-ABR. Higher sensitivity but lower specificity was suggested for ASSR than ABR.

CONCLUSIONS

ASSR is associated with high-frequency specificity, shorter test sessions and good correlations with behavioural thresholds, making it a potentially better measure than ABR for predicting audiograms in subjects with NIHL. These findings have diagnostic implications, especially in cases of workers' compensation when subjects may be uncooperative.

Intraoperative auditory steady-state monitoring during surgery in the cerebellopontine angle for estimation of postoperative hearing classes

OBJECTIVE Brainstem auditory evoked potentials (BAEPs) have been used for intraoperative monitoring of the auditory nerve for many years. However, BAEPs yield limited information about the expected postoperative hearing quality and speech perception. The auditory steady-state response (ASSR) enables objective audiograms to be obtained in patients under anesthesia. These ASSRs could be used for intraoperative estimation of hearing classes to improve the postoperative outcome and quality of life. Studies investigating the clinical use of ASSRs during total intravenous anesthesia are currently lacking. The work presented in this article therefore investigates the application of ASSRs for intraoperative estimation of hearing classes. METHODS In 43 patients undergoing surgery for vestibular schwannoma, ASSR measurements were performed at the beginning and end of the surgical procedure. ASSR stimuli consisted of 80-dB hearing level amplitude-modulated tones with 5-minute duration, 90-Hz modulation, and 3 different carrier frequencies: 500, 1000, and 2000 Hz. Stimulation was performed unilaterally with and without contralateral masking, using single and combined carriers. Evoked responses were recorded and analyzed in the frequency domain. ASSRs were compared with extraoperative hearing classes and BAEPs using ANOVA, correlation, and receiver operating characteristic statistics. RESULTS ASSRs yielded high and consistent area under the curve (AUC) values (mean 0.83) and correlation values (mean -0.63), indicating reliable prediction of hearing classes. Analysis of BAEP amplitude changes showed lower AUC (mean 0.79) and correlation values (0.63, 0.37, and 0.50 for Waves I, III, and V, respectively). Latencies showed low AUC values (mean 0.6) and no significant correlation. Combination of several carriers for simultaneous evaluation reduced ASSR amplitudes and respective AUC values. Contralateral masking did not show a significant effect. CONCLUSIONS ASSRs robustly estimate hearing class in patients under total intravenous anesthesia, even when using short measurement durations. The method provides a diagnostic performance that exceeds conventional BAEP monitoring and enables objective and automated evaluation. On the basis of these findings, continuous intraoperative auditory monitoring could become a promising alternative or adjunct to BAEPs.

Longitudinal Comparison of Auditory Steady-State Evoked Potentials in Preterm and Term Infants: The Maturation Process

Introduction  Preterm neonates are at risk of changes in their auditory system development, which explains the need for auditory monitoring of this population. The Auditory Steady-State Response (ASSR) is an objective method that allows obtaining the electrophysiological thresholds with greater applicability in neonatal and pediatric population.

Objective  The purpose of this study is to compare the ASSR thresholds in preterm and term infants evaluated during two stages.

Method  The study included 63 normal hearing neonates: 33 preterm and 30 term. They underwent assessment of ASSR in both ears simultaneously through insert phones in the frequencies of 500 to 4000Hz with the amplitude modulated from 77 to 103Hz. We presented the intensity at a decreasing level to detect the minimum level of responses. At 18 months, 26 of 33 preterm infants returned for the new assessment for ASSR and were compared with 30 full-term infants. We compared between groups according to gestational age.

Results  Electrophysiological thresholds were higher in preterm than in full-term neonates ( p  < 0.05) at the first testing. There were no significant differences between ears and gender. At 18 months, there was no difference between groups ( p  > 0.05) in all the variables described.

Conclusion  In the first evaluation preterm had higher thresholds in ASSR. There was no difference at 18 months of age, showing the auditory maturation of preterm infants throughout their development.

Assessment of low-frequency hearing with narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady-state response

Objective To determine the clinical utility of narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz sinusoidal auditory steady state responses (s-ASSR) in the assessment of low-frequency hearing in noisy participants. Design Tone bursts and narrow-band chirps were used to respectively evoke auditory brainstem responses (tb-ABR) and 40-Hz s-ASSR thresholds with the Kalman-weighted filtering technique and were compared to behavioral thresholds at 500, 2000, and 4000 Hz. A repeated measure ANOVA and post-hoc t-tests, and simple regression analyses were performed for each of the three stimulus frequencies. Study sample Thirty young adults aged 18-25 with normal hearing participated in this study. Results When 4000 equivalent response averages were used, the range of mean s-ASSR thresholds from 500, 2000, and 4000 Hz were 17-22 dB lower (better) than when 2000 averages were used. The range of mean tb-ABR thresholds were lower by 11-15 dB for 2000 and 4000 Hz when twice as many equivalent response averages were used, while mean tb-ABR thresholds for 500 Hz were indistinguishable regardless of additional response averaging. Conclusion Narrow-band chirp-evoked 40-Hz s-ASSR requires a ∼15 dB smaller correction factor than tb-ABR for estimating low-frequency auditory threshold in noisy participants when adequate response averaging is used.

Hearing aid validation based on 40 Hz auditory steady-state response thresholds

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Aided thresholds can be used for prediction of success of hearing aids and to choose between hearing aids and cochlear implants. This study aimed to compare characteristics of aided and unaided auditory steady-state responses (ASSRs).

METHODS

A total of 30 moderate to profoundly hearing-impaired subjects participated in this study. The subjects underwent acoustic immittance, behavioral audiometry, and ASSR with the modulation rate of 40 Hz, first without a hearing aid and then with a hearing aid. Sixteen people with normal hearing and 17 people with severe hearing loss were included in biological calibration of the sound field.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between unaided behavioral and ASSR thresholds in all test frequencies (mean difference of unaided behavioral ASSR thresholds: 6.19 dB; P = 0.02 at 500 Hz, P < 0.001 at 1000 and 2000 Hz, and P = 0.02 for 4000 Hz). There was also a significant difference between aided behavioral and ASSR thresholds at 1000 and 2000 Hz (P < 0.001) but not at 500 (P = 0.14) and 4000 (P = 0.23) Hz (mean difference of behavioral ASSR thresholds was 4.33 dB). Despite observing any unaided responses, aided thresholds could be recorded in some severe to profoundly hearing-impaired subjects. The number of recordable thresholds was directly related to speech clarity and speech-reading ability. Multi-frequency stimulation elevated the ASSR threshold, especially for the higher frequencies and in the aided condition.

CONCLUSION

Functional and ASSR gains show less difference than threshold data. Therefore, comparing gains instead of thresholds is more accurate for validation of hearing aids. The probability of success of hearing aids appears to be poor if ASSRs (especially aided ones) cannot be recorded. If special care is taken in the fitting of hearing aids and the testing conditions, aided ASSR testing could be a useful tool for validation of hearing aids and the cochlear implant decision-making process.

Auditory steady-state responses in school-aged children: a pilot study

Background

The use of Auditory Steady-State Responses (ASSRs) for auditory screening in school-aged children, particularly in children who are difficult to test and children with disabilities, has not been explored yet. This pilot study investigated the use of ASSR for auditory screening in school-aged children.

Materials and methods

A cross-sectional pilot study of 23 children aged 9 to 11 with normal-hearing thresholds and seven age-matched children with permanent moderate-to-profound bilateral hearing loss were examined. The tested carrier frequencies were 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz, and the stimulus was modulated between 77 and 107 Hz. The ASSRs decreased according to the tested intensity levels of 50, 40, and 30 dB sound pressure level (SPL). Sensitivity and specificity were estimated from the responses of the children with normal hearing and those with hearing loss.

Results

For the children with normal hearing, the 2,000-Hz frequency was detected more often in both ears and at all intensity levels compared to the other frequencies. The 500- and 2,000-Hz frequencies resulted in different response patterns in both ears. The time until response detection increased in parallel with amplitude reduction, as expected. The overall time required for the test was 15 minutes, including the time spent in volunteer preparation. The sensitivity was 97% for the three intensities, and the best specificity value was 100%, which was observed at 50 dB.

Discussion

The response analysis indicated that a screening protocol for school-aged children could include 1,000, 2,000, and 4,000 Hz and that the recording of ASSRs was highly sensitive to internal and external factors. Fifty dB SPL should be considered a cut-off criterion for screening purposes because this was the intensity level with a sensitivity of 97% and a specificity of 100%.

Conclusion

The use of ASSRs might be particularly useful in school-aged children who have difficulty performing subjective hearing tests. The sensitivity and specificity data suggested that the use of ASSRs was feasible as an auditory screening tool. In order to determine a protocol for screening, future studies should include a larger sample and children with mild hearing loss.

Refining the audiological assessment in children using narrow-band CE-Chirp-evoked auditory steady state responses

OBJECTIVE

To demonstrate the feasibility and reliability of simultaneous binaural recording of auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) in young children using narrow-band CE-Chirps as stimuli.

DESIGN

Prospective cohort study comparing ASSR thresholds to four frequency stimuli (0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz), with click-evoked auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and behavioral response audiometry.

STUDY SAMPLE

Thirty-two young children (mean age 7.4 ± 5.2 months) referred for auditory assessment were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean duration for ABR recordings was 13.3 ± 7.2 min versus 22.9 ± 15.8 min for ASSR (p < 0.01). ASSR (means of 2 and 4 kHz thresholds) were highly correlated with ABR thresholds (R2 = 0.935, p < 0.001), though significantly different (3 ± 10.7 dB, p = 0.02). ASSR (means of 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz thresholds) were highly correlated with mean behavioral response audiometry thresholds (R2 = 0.968, p < 0.001). ASSRs were highly and significantly correlated with behavioral response audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz (R2 = 0.845, 0.907, 0.929, and 0.859 respectively, p < 0.001). 87.5% and 90.7% ASSR thresholds were within a ± 10 dB range around their corresponding ABR and mean behavioral response audiometry thresholds.

CONCLUSIONS

Narrow-band CE-Chirps allow a fast and reliable assessment of auditory thresholds in children, especially in the low-frequency range, by comparison with other stimuli.

Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects✩✩Please cite this article as: Beck RM, Ramos BF, Grasel SS, Ramos HF, Moraes MF, Almeida ER, et al. Comparative study between pure tone audiometry and auditory steady-state responses in normal hearing subjects. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol. 2014;80:35-40

Introdução

As respostas auditivas de estado estável permitem avaliar de forma objetiva limiares auditivos frequência-específica. A audiometria tonal é o exame padrão-ouro; no entanto, nem sempre pode ser conclusiva, principalmente em crianças e adultos não colaborativos.

Objetivo

Comparar os limiares auditivos da RAEE aos da audiometria tonal em indivíduos com audição normal.

Materiais e métodos

Foram incluídos neste estudo prospectivo de corte transversal 26 adultos (52 orelhas), de ambos os gêneros, com audiometria normal e sem queixas otológicas. Os pacientes foram submetidos a anamnese, otomicroscopia, audiometria e imitanciometria. A seguir, realizou-se avaliação de respostas auditivas de estado estável. Os resultados obtidos foram analisados estatisticamente e comparados entre si.

Resultados

A diferença entre os limiares (em dB NA) obtidos em ambos os exames para cada frequência testada foi de 7,12 dB para 500 Hz; 7,6 dB para 1000 Hz; 8,27 dB para 2000 Hz e 9,71 dB para 4000 Hz, com limiares mais elevados na RAEE, em todas as frequências. Não houve diferença estatística entre as médias para cada frequência testada.

Conclusão

Os limiares obtidos na RAEE foram comparáveis aos da audiometria tonal em indivíduos normouvintes; entretanto, não deve ser usado como único método de avaliação auditiva.

© 2014 Associação Brasileira de Otorrinolaringologia e Cirurgia Cérvico-Facial. Publicado por Elsevier Editora Ltda. Todos os direitos reservados.

The efficiency of the single- versus multiple-stimulus auditory steady state responses in infants

OBJECTIVES

Multiple auditory steady state responses (ASSRs) will likely be included in the diagnostic test battery for estimating infant auditory thresholds in the near future; however, the effects of single- versus multiple-stimulus presentation in infants has never been investigated. In adults, there are no interactions (reduced amplitudes) between responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli presented at 60 dB SPL or lower. Maturational differences, however, may lead to greater interactions in infants; thus, it is unknown whether the single-stimulus technique or the multiple-stimulus technique is more efficient for testing infants. Two studies were carried out to address this issue.

DESIGN

All infants in study A participated in three stimulus conditions, which differed in the number of stimuli presented simultaneously. The monotic single (MS) condition consisted of 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz tones, which were presented singly to one ear. The monotic multiple (MM) condition was composed of four tones (500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz) presented to one ear simultaneously. The dichotic multiple (DM) condition consisted of eight tones presented simultaneously to both ears (four tones to each ear). ASSR amplitudes were obtained from 15 normal infants (mean age: 23.1 wks) in response to multiple (MM, DM) and single (MS) air conduction amplitude-modulated (AM) tones (77 to 105 Hz modulation rates; 60 dB SPL). In study B, ASSR thresholds were determined for 500-Hz stimuli in the single- and DM-stimulus conditions (14 infants; mean age: 20.2 wks).

RESULTS

Mean single-stimulus ASSR amplitudes for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz were 30, 39, 45 and 43 nV, respectively. Presentation of multiple AM tones (i.e., four octave-spaced frequencies) to one ear resulted in ASSR amplitudes that were 97%, 87%, 82%, and 70% (for 500, 1000, 2000, and 4000 Hz, respectively) of the single-stimulus ASSR amplitudes. Results for the dichotic presentation of eight AM tones show ASSR amplitudes that were 70%, 77%, 67%, and 67% relative to the MS condition. Although decreases in amplitude occurred using multiple stimuli in infants, the multiple ASSR remained more efficient than the single-stimulus ASSR (i.e., multiple-stimulus amplitudes were greater than single-stimulus amplitudes divided by √K, where K is the number of stimuli). Results from study B indicate that ASSR thresholds for 500 Hz presented in the DM condition were elevated 3 dB compared with that obtained in the 500-Hz single-stimulus condition. This statistically nonsignificant difference is within the range of acceptable test-retest variability and is thus not of clinical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The amplitude reductions seen in the multiple-stimulus conditions in infants, not seen in adults, could be related to maturational differences in the ear canal, middle ear, cochlea, and/or brain stem. Because greater interactions occur in the DM-stimulus condition compared with the monotic multiple-stimulus condition and baseline single-stimulus condition, brain stem origins of these interactions are likely. Study B revealed statistically nonsignificant differences between threshold for 500 Hz when presented in the single- and DM-stimulus conditions. In summary, as with adults, multiple-stimulus presentation in infants is more efficient than single AM tones, at least for 60 dB SPL stimuli.

[Electrophysiological characterisation of envelope-following responses]

INTRODUCTION

The auditory ability to discriminate rapid changes in the envelope of language sounds is essential for speech comprehension. This ability is deteriorated in some neurological diseases such as multiple sclerosis, auditory neuropathy, sensorineural hearing loss, presbycusis and primary developmental language disorder. Envelope-following responses (EFRs) in humans are useful in objective measurement of temporal processing in the auditory nervous system.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate EFRs in healthy younger subjects and to investigate the effects of subject states on the EFRs recorded.

METHODS

Eleven young subjects were included; six of them were awake and five were asleep. EFRs were evoked by white noise carrier stimuli with a sweep of modulation frequencies from 20 to 200Hz presented at 50dB HL.

RESULTS

The EFRs we recorded were similar in all subjects. There were two principal components. During both subject sleep and wakefulness, the first component (located between 30-50Hz) was significantly larger than the second component (located between 80-110Hz). There was also a significant effect of sleep on the EFR amplitude for the modulation frequencies between 88-110, 155-165 and 190-200Hz. However, there were no significant effects of sleep on the principal EFR components.

CONCLUSIONS

These results corroborate the usefulness of the EFR technique for objective measurement of human auditory temporal processing.

[Auditory steady-state responses--the state of art]

The auditory steady-state responses (ASSR) is quite a new method of electrophysiological threshold estimation with no clinical standards. It was the aim of this study to review practical and theoretical thesis of ASSR and mention recent recommendations and achievements of this technique. The most common application of ASSR is diagnosis of hearing loss in children together with ABR test. In this paper we mentioned information about influence of physiological factors (age, sex, state of arousal, handedness) and type of recording technique (electrodes placement, air and bone stimulation, occlusion effect, amplitude and frequency stimulation, multiple or single frequency stimulation, dichotic and monotic recording technique and type of hearing loss) on ASSR. We conclude that putting ASSR in clinical use as an standardized method it is necessary to do research with numerous groups of patients using the same equipment and parameters of tests.

Audiometric threshold screening method using envelope detection filters of intensity ramping click auditory steady-state responses

The Auditory Steady-state Responses (ASSR) elicited by click stimuli can be utilized for hearing screening as is traditionally done with click-evoked Auditory Brainstem Responses (ABR). In a typical ASSR or ABR hearing screening, several recordings at different intensities are required to find the response threshold. In this study the use of binaural click stimulus with time ramping intensity produces dual-ear evoked potentials in only one recording session, decreasing significantly the recording time. To achieve this performance a one second sweep consisting of repetitive click stimuli, with logarithmically ramping up intensity, is presented to one or both ears simultaneously. Unique repetition frequencies for each ear are used in order to differentiate the responses coming from each ear. The stimuli sweep is repeated and the EEG data corresponding to each sweep is averaged until a pre-specified residual noise level is achieved. Hilbert-transform-based envelope detection filters in the time domain are used to estimate the signal and noise energy around the main stimulation rate. Because the stimulus time-intensity functions are known, thresholds can be estimated from the response onset time position by estimating the significance of the signal to noise ratio. Preliminary results indicate a strong agreement of the obtained thresholds with behavioral thresholds.