Avoiding Neurovascular Risk During Percutaneous Clamp Reduction of Spiral Tibial Shaft Fractures: An Anatomic Correlation With Computed Tomography

Fracture gap and working length are important actionable factors affecting bone union after minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis for the treatment of simple diaphyseal or distal metaphyseal tibia fractures

INTRODUCTION

Indirect reduction of minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis (MIPO) can often result in delayed union in tibia fractures. This study evaluated several factors in MIPO in relation to bone union.

HYPOTHESIS

We hypothesized that the fracture gap, plate - tibia distance, or working length would have a substantial effect on the tibia union rate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-one patients with simple diaphyseal or distal metaphyseal tibia fractures who underwent internal fixation surgery using the MIPO technique were divided into two groups: patients with delayed union and patients without delayed union. Non-actionable factors involving AO/OTA classification, fibula fracture and actionable factors including postoperative fracture gap, plate - tibia distance, working length in relation to parameters of bone union were compared between the two groups. Also cumulative rates of bone union and risk factors of delayed union according to variables of interest were investigated.

RESULTS

AO/OTA classification, site of fibula fracture, postoperative fracture gap, working length, and bone union rate of the two groups significantly differed (p<0.05). The cumulative rate of bone union during 1-year follow-up according to 43A tibia fracture, distal fibula fracture, fracture gap, and working length significantly differed between the two groups (p<0.05). By univariate Cox proportional hazards model, 43A tibia fracture, distal fibula fracture, facture gap, and short working length were risk factors for delayed union (p<0.05).

DISCUSSION

Non-actionable factors involving AO/OTA classification, distal fibula fracture and actionable factors including postoperative fracture gap, working length were significant factors affecting bone union after MIPO. The present study indicated that small fracture gap and long working length during MIPO might facilitate bone healing in tibia fracture.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV; single-center retrospective cohort study.

[Application of lithotomy position in closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fracture]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the application value of lithotomy position in the treatment of tibial shaft fracture with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation.

METHODS

The clinical data of 78 patients with tibial shaft fractures treated with closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation between January 2015 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. Among them, 33 patients were treated with lithotomy position (trial group) and 45 patients were treated with traditional supine position (control group). There was no significant difference between the two groups in general data such as gender, age, the cause of injury, the interval between injury and admission, the interval between injury and operation, and fracture type and site ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, the number of patients with open reduction, postoperative incision infection, and fracture healing were recorded. Pain visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Harris score were used to evaluate the effectiveness.

RESULTS

Both groups of operations were successfully completed. The trial group was superior to the control group in terms of operation time, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and the number of patients with open reduction ( P<0.05). Incision infection occurred in 1 case (3.03%) of the trial group and 3 cases (6.67%) of the control group after operation. The difference in the incidence of infection was significant ( χ 2=0.139, P=0.045). The incisions of other patients healed by first intention. X-ray film reexamination showed that the fractures of the two groups healed. The fracture healing time of the trial group was (5.30±1.33) months, while that of the control group was (5.98±1.80) months, with no significant difference ( t=-1.815, P=0.073). There was no significant difference in VAS score, Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint between the two groups before operation and at 3, 6, and 12 months after operation ( P>0.05). At 3 days after operation, the VAS score was lower in the trial group than in the control group, and the Harris scores of knee joint and ankle joint were higher in the trial group than in the control group, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Application of lithotomy position in closed reduction and interlocking intramedullary nail fixation for tibial shaft fracture is favorable for fracture reduction, with less bleeding, shorter operation time, and fewer fluoroscopy.