Does Operative Intervention Provide Early Pain Relief for Patients With Unilateral Sacral Fractures and Minimal or No Displacement?

Lateral Compression Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis: Diagnosis, Classifications, and Modern Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the diagnosis, classification, and modern management of lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis.

RECENT FINDINGS

Practice patterns are shifting toward early operative treatment of fragility fractures of the pelvis among patients who are unable to mobilize or whose injuries demonstrate occult instability on stress imaging. Early internal fixation appears to decrease pain, facilitate mobilization, accelerate hospital discharge, and minimize morbidity in this population. Lateral compression pelvic ring injuries are the most common type of fragility fracture of the pelvis. Similar to fragility fractures of the hip, lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis are typically sustained in a ground level fall. These injuries are associated with long acute hospital and post-acute facility admissions, loss of physical function, loss of independence, mortality, anxiety, sleep disturbance, and caregiver burnout. Unlike hip fractures, for which urgent operative treatment and early mobilization reduce mortality, lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis are commonly treated without surgery. Recommendations for nonoperative management of these injuries in older adults may be inappropriately generalized from studies of younger patient populations with high-energy mechanisms of pelvis fracture. However, strong evidence to support early internal fixation of these injuries practice is lacking. High quality investigations of early surgical intervention for lateral compression fragility fractures of the pelvis are needed to guide care for these patients.

The EMS stress view: occult pelvic instability revealed by pre-hospital pelvic binder placement

PURPOSE

To describe and evaluate the serendipitous pelvic binder stress radiographs of lateral compression type (LC) pelvic ring injuries.

METHODS

This was a retrospective case series performed at a single, level I academic trauma center from 2016 to 2018. All patients presenting with a minimally displaced LC pelvic ring injury were reviewed (< 10 cm displacement on static pelvic radiographs). Patients with X-rays (XR) in a pelvic binder (EMS stress) and with the pelvic binder removed were included. Pelvic ring stability was determined by attending surgeon evaluation of EMS stress radiographs versus static XR of the pelvis. Patients were treated non-operatively and allowed to weight bear or taken to the operating room for exam under anesthesia (EUA) and potential operative fixation. Clinical success of treatment was determined by evaluation of further displacement at the completion of their most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-seven patients of the initial 398 reviewed met inclusion criteria. Fourteen of 37 patients (38%) were categorized as stable with no significant pelvis displacement seen on EMS stress and were treated non-operatively without further sequelae (4.6 months mean follow-up). The remaining 23/37 (62%) were treated operatively. Occult instability was identified on EMS stress in 14 (61%) of those 23 patients and the remainder were determined to be unstable based upon fracture pattern or EUA. All patients went on to successful treatment without significant pelvic deformity (7.8 months mean follow-up).

CONCLUSION

The EMS stress XR is a valuable, opportunistic evaluation in LC pelvic ring injuries. This evaluation is a useful diagnostic adjunct to alert the provider that additional stress imaging may be indicated to evaluate for occult pelvic ring instability.

Comparison of Operative and Nonoperative Management of Elderly Fragility Pelvic Ring Fractures

OBJECTIVES

To compare outcomes of nonoperative and percutaneous fixation of geriatric fragility lateral compression 1 (LC1) pelvic ring fractures.

METHODS

DESIGN

Retrospective.

SETTING

Two level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Included were patients who were 60 years or older with an isolated LC1 pelvic ring fracture managed nonoperatively or those who failed mobilization and were managed operatively with percutaneous sacral fixation. Patients with high-energy mechanisms of injury or polytrauma were excluded.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

The primary outcome was pain as measured by using the visual analog scale (VAS) after treatment. Secondary outcomes included length of stay, discharge disposition, mortality, readmission rates, and complications.

RESULTS

In total, 231 patients were included with a mean age of 79.5 years (range 60-100). One hundred eighty-five (80.0%) patients were female. Sixty-two (26.8%) patients received percutaneous sacral fixation after failed mobilization, and 169 (73.2%) were managed nonoperatively. In the operative group, the median time to surgery was hospital day 4. Nonoperative patients were older (81.5 ± 10.0 years vs. 74.2 ± 9.4 years, P < 0.01) and had a shorter hospital length of stay (4.8 ± 6.2 days) than the operative group (10.6 ± 9.5 days, P < 0.01). Patients in the operative group had more pain (VAS 7.9 ± 3.0) than those in the nonoperative group (VAS 6.6 ± 3.0) ( P = 0.01) on admission but had similar pain control postoperatively (VAS 4.4 ± 3.0) compared with the nonoperative group (VAS 4.5 ± 3.6) on the equivalent hospital day ( P = 0.91). Thus, patients in the operative group experienced more improvement in pain (VAS 3.3 ± 2.7) compared with the nonoperative group (VAS 1.9 ± 3.9) after treatment ( P = 0.02). Ninety-day mortality ( P = 0.21) and readmission rates ( P = 0.27) were similar for both groups. Two patients in the operative cohort sustained nerve injuries, whereas 1 patient in the nonoperative group had a nonunion and underwent surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who undergo percutaneous surgical fixation for low-energy LC1 injuries have similar discharge disposition, mortality, complication rates, and readmission rates compared with patients treated nonoperatively. Percutaneous surgical fixation may provide significant pain relief for patients who failed conservative management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Stability before and after percutaneous anterior medullary fixation of lateral compression 1 and 2 pelvic ring disruptions: Should surgeons prioritize the anterior ring?

PURPOSE

Surgical intervention for lateral compression (LC) 1 and 2 pelvic ring fractures is controversial. Posterior ring stabilization remains the most common mode of initial fixation. However, greater mechanical instability is observed in the anterior component of LC pelvic fractures. This study tested whether reduction and percutaneous superior ramus fixation will decrease the instability of LC pelvic fractures on intraoperative fluoroscopic imaging.

METHODS

All adult patients (≥ 18 years) presenting with either a Young-Burgess LC1 or LC2 pelvic ring disruption treated operatively with percutaneous anterior followed by posterior fixation by a single surgeon from July 2021 to June 2023 were retrospectively reviewed. Displacement of the anterior ring to intraoperative manual internal rotation stress examination under fluoroscopy was compared before and after anterior pelvic ring reduction and fixation and prior to posterior pelvic ring fixation. Pre- and post-operative visual analog scores (VAS) for pain were also compared.

RESULTS

Twenty-one patients with a mean age of 48.7 years were included. Fifteen patients (71.4%) presented with an LC1, and six (28.6%) with an LC2 injury patterns. Anterior pelvic fixation alone provided 7.5mm reduction in mean displacement of the anterior pelvic ring (pre-operative = 9.2 mm vs. post-operative = 1.6 mm, p < 0.001). VAS significantly decreased from 7.2 one-day pre-operatively to 2.2 twenty-four h post-operatively (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reduction and fixation of the anterior pelvic ring prior to posterior fixation for LC1 and LC2 pelvic ring disruptions substantially improves mechanical stability on intraoperative stress examination. Combination of percutaneous anterior and posterior fixation significantly decreased VAS above the MCID 24 h after stabilization.

Standardization and Reproducibility of Dynamic Stress Testing for Occult Pelvic Ring Instability

INTRODUCTION

Examination under anesthesia (EUA) (stress fluoroscopy) is commonly done after pelvic ring injury to identify occult instability because unstable disruptions may displace causing morbidity. The force applied during EUA for these injuries has not been standardized. The purpose of this study was to examine the forces used during the EUA by experienced orthopaedic trauma pelvic surgeons.

METHODS

Orthopaedic traumatologists performed simulated EUA on a cadaver at two North American pelvis and acetabular courses using internal rotation (IR), external rotation, and push-pull maneuvers while wearing a handheld dynamometer to measure force. All surgeons used a comparable method, and each performed EUA multiple times. Maximum forces were measured in Newton (N).

RESULTS

Eighteen surgeons participated. Four had been practicing for <5 years, six for 5 to 10 years, six for 11 to 20 years, and two for >20 years. Surgeons applied a force ranging from 40.4 to 374.9 N during IR, 72.9 to 338.4 N during external rotation, and 25 to 323 N during push-pull, with notable variability seen between surgeons. Three surgeons (18%) had >50-N variability on serial trials of a single EUA maneuver (IR).

DISCUSSION

This is the first study evaluating the forces applied during pelvic EUA used to assess ring stability. Notable variability existed among surgeons performing EUA and in serial examinations by the same surgeon. Additional study is needed to standardize the displacement measured and threshold for instability that guides management.

Does Fracture Pattern Really Predict Displacement of LC1 Sacral Fractures?

BACKGROUND

Operative management of minimally displaced lateral compression type-1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries remains controversial. We aimed to assess the proportion of LC1 pelvic fractures that displaced following nonoperative management as a function of specific ring fracture patterns, and we quantified the magnitude of this displacement.

METHODS

A retrospective review of the billing registry of a level-I trauma center was performed. Two hundred and seventy-three patients with a high-energy LC1 pelvic ring fracture and <5 mm of sacral displacement were included. The fracture pattern was characterized with use of computed tomography (CT) scans and radiographs. Absolute and interval pelvic ring displacement were quantified with use of previously described methodology.

RESULTS

Thirty-five pelvic ring injuries (13%) were displaced. The rate of displacement was 31% (15 of 49) for LC1 injuries involving a complete sacral fracture and bilateral ramus fractures, 12% (7 of 58) for injuries involving a complete sacral fracture and a unilateral ramus fracture, and 10% (5 of 52) for injuries involving an incomplete sacral fracture and bilateral ramus fractures. In displaced injuries, the average interval displacement was 4.2 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.8 to 6.8) and the final displacement was 9.9 mm ± 4.2 mm.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that fracture characteristics can be used to predict the likelihood of displacement of LC1 fractures that are treated without surgery. To our knowledge, the present study is the first to describe the magnitude of displacement that may occur in association with LC1 pelvic ring injuries that are treated nonoperatively; however, further studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of this displacement.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic Level IV . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Work Productivity Loss After Minimally Displaced Complete Lateral Compression Pelvis Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To quantify work impairment and economic losses due to lost employment, lost work time (absenteeism), and lost productivity while working (presenteeism) after a lateral compression pelvic ring fracture. Secondarily, productivity loss of patients treated with surgical fixation versus nonoperative management was compared.

METHODS

DESIGN

Secondary analysis of a prospective, multicenter trial.

SETTING

Two level I academic trauma centers.

PATIENT SELECTION CRITERIA

Adult patients with a lateral compression pelvic fracture (OTA/AO 61-B1/B2) with a complete posterior pelvic ring fracture and less than 10 mm of initial displacement. Excluded were patients who were not working or non-ambulatory before their pelvis fracture or who had a concomitant spinal cord injury.

OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS

Work impairment, including hours lost to unemployment, absenteeism, and presenteeism, measured by Work Productivity and Activity Impairment assessments in the year after injury. Results after non-operative and operative treatment were compared.

RESULTS

Of the 64 included patients, forty-seven percent (30/64) were treated with surgical fixation, and 53% (30/64) with nonoperative management. 63% returned to work within 1 year of injury. Workers lost an average of 67% of a 2080-hour average work year, corresponding with $56,276 in lost economic productivity. Of the 1395 total hours lost, 87% was due to unemployment, 3% to absenteeism, and 10% to presenteeism. Surgical fixation was associated with 27% fewer lost hours (1155 vs. 1583, P = 0.005) and prevented $17,266 in average lost economic productivity per patient compared with nonoperative management.

CONCLUSIONS

Lateral compression pelvic fractures are associated with a substantial economic impact on patients and society. Surgical fixation reduces work impairment and the corresponding economic burden.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Economic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Postmobilization Plain Radiography After Lateral Compression Type 1 Pelvic Ring Injury Does Not Affect Treatment

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to describe the practice of postmobilization radiography after lateral compression type 1 pelvis ring injury. We hypothesized that postmobilization radiographs would be more frequent over time and would not influence treatment.

METHODS

Displacement of pelvis ring injury on initial and final plain radiographs was measured. Frequency of postmobilization radiography was determined, and the impact on treatment and final radiographical outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

Of the 156 patients reviewed, 98 (62.8%) were women and mean age was 60.1 years. Thirty-three of 156 patients (21.2%) had a postmobilization radiograph. Over 5 years, radiographs increased to 67% of presenting patients. None of the patients who received postmobilization plain radiographs (n = 33) had any change in clinical plan afterward; all continued with nonsurgical care. Initial fracture characteristics and alignment were no different for patients with postmobilization radiographs. Final alignment was unchanged in nearly 70%. Overall, 74% of all nonsurgical patients experienced no change in alignment, with similar rates among the patients with postmobilization radiographs.

DISCUSSION

Patients with an lateral compression type 1 fracture demonstrated no changes in care after receiving postmobilization radiographs. However, the frequency of postmobilization radiographs increased over time, denoting opportunities to reduce costs and to improve efficiency and safety.

Surgical stabilisation in equivocal pelvic ring injuries - Into the grey zone

Pelvic ring injuries comprise a spectrum of bony, ligamentous and muscular injuries, described by several common classification systems. However, the majority of injuries lie in areas of intermediate severity, where complexity and variable nature make it extremely hard to define in detail. This fact and associated injuries make it extremely difficult to conduct randomised control trials, with purpose to direct treatment guidelines. Thus, special interest and expertise are required by pelvic trauma surgeons, while surgical indications and fixation methods rely on their experience, at least in part. Namely, a significant grey zone of indication exists. As fixation methods evolve, specifically percutaneous fixation using osseous fixation pathways, some injuries in which morbidity bound with surgical fixation was considered too high relative to its benefits, may be considered eligible for surgical treatment nowadays. Moreover, due to significant progress in the treatment of the acute polytrauma casualties, the survival rate increased over the years, emphasizing the effect of long-term morbidity and functional outcome of pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this manuscript is to describe the equivocal areas of controversies, hence "the grey zone", and to provide the readership with up-to-date published data. We aimed to collect and detail clinical and radiological clues in the diagnosis of intermediate unstable anterior-posterior compression and lateral compression injuries, and for the selection of treatment methods and sequence. Recent publications have provided some insights into specific injury features that are correlated with increased chance of instability, pain and delay in ambulation. Specific focus is given to the utility of examination under anaesthesia in selected cases. Other publications surveyed the shared experience of pelvic trauma surgeons as for the classification, indication and treatment sequence of pelvic ring injuries. Although the data hasn't matured yet to a comprehensive treatment algorithm, it may serve clinicians well when making treatment decisions in the grey zone of pelvic ring injuries, and serve as a basis for future prospective studies.

Pelvic ring injuries: recent advances in diagnosis and treatment

Pelvic ring injuries typically occur from high-energy trauma and are often associated with multisystem injuries. Prompt diagnosis of pelvic ring injuries is essential, and timely initial management is critical in the early resuscitation of polytraumatized patients. Definitive management of pelvic ring injuries continues to be a topic of much debate in the trauma community. Recent studies continue to inform our understanding of static and dynamic pelvic ring stability. Furthermore, literature investigating radiographic and clinical outcomes after nonoperative and operative management will help guide trauma surgeons select the most appropriate treatment of patients with these injuries.

Surgical treatment of sacral nonunions

Sacral fractures are complex injuries that follow a bimodal distribution, typically involving acute high energy trauma in young adults and low energy trauma in older adults (> 65 years old). Nonunion is a rare but debilitating potential complication of undiagnosed or improperly managed sacral fractures. Various surgical techniques, including open reduction and internal fixation, sacroplasty, and percutaneous screw fixation, have been used to manage these fracture nonunions. In addition to reviewing the initial management of sacral fractures and the risk factors for fracture nonunion, this article describes techniques, specific cases and outcomes of these treatment strategies.

Sacral Fractures: A Review

At the cornerstone of the pelvis and spine, the sacrum may be fractured in patients of all ages. Sacral fractures range from high-energy injuries, with mortality rates of up to 18%, to low-energy insufficiency fractures. The intricate geometry of the sacrum, the breadth of morphotypes, and the presence of congenital anomalies all can complicate the treatment of these fractures. Agreement on the surgical indications for these injuries is limited. This narrative review aims to update orthopedic surgeons on the clinical evaluation and the non-surgical and surgical management of these fractures.

Combined Anterior-Posterior versus Posterior-Only Fixation of Stress-Positive Minimally Displaced Lateral Compression Type 1 (LC1) Pelvic Ring Injuries

OBJECTIVES

To compare hospital outcomes and late displacement between stress-positive minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries treated with combined anterior-posterior versus posterior-only fixation.

DESIGN

Retrospective comparative cohort.

SETTING

Urban level-one trauma center.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

LC1 injuries managed operatively.

INTERVENTION

Anterior-posterior versus posterior-only fixation.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Physical therapy (PT) clearance, discharge location, hospital length of stay (LOS), inpatient morphine equivalent doses (MED), and fracture displacement at follow-up.

RESULTS

Groups were similar in demographic and injury characteristics (age, high energy mechanism, ASA score, stress displacement, and rami/sacral fracture classifications). Anterior-posterior fixation resulted in longer operative times (median difference (MD): 27.0 minutes, 95% confidence interval (CI): 17.0 to 40.0, P < 0.0001) and had a trend of increased estimated blood loss (MD: 10 mL, CI: 0 to 30, P = 0.07). Patients with anterior-posterior fixation required less inpatient MEDs (MD: -180.0, CI: -341.2 to -15.0, P = 0.02), were more likely to clear PT by discharge (100% vs. 70%, proportional difference (PD): 30%, CI: 2.0%-57.2%, P = 0.02), were less likely to discharge to rehabilitation facilities (0% vs. 30%, PD: 30%, CI: 2.0%-57.2%, P = 0.02), and had a trend of less days to clear PT after surgery (MD: -1, CI: -2 to 0, P = 0.09) and decreased LOS (MD: -1, CI: -4 to 1, P = 0.17). Late fracture displacement did not differ between groups.

CONCLUSION

Anterior-posterior fixation of LC1 injuries was associated with an improved early hospital course-specifically, reduced inpatient opioid use and an increased number of patients who could clear PT and discharge home.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Unilateral Sacral Fractures Demonstrate Slow Recovery of Patient-Reported Outcomes Irrespective of Treatment

OBJECTIVES

To report functional outcomes of unilateral sacral fractures treated both operatively and nonoperatively.

DESIGN

Prospective, multicenter, observational study.

SETTING

Sixteen Level 1 trauma centers.

PATIENTS/PARTICIPANTS

Skeletally mature patients with unilateral zone 1 or 2 sacral fractures categorized as displaced nonoperative (DN), displaced operative (DO), nondisplaced nonoperative (NN), and nondisplaced operative (NO).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

Pelvic displacement was documented on injury plain radiographs. Short Musculoskeletal Function Assessment (SMFA) scores were obtained at baseline and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months after injury. Displacement was defined as greater than 5 mm in any plane at the time of injury.

RESULTS

Two hundred eighty-six patients with unilateral sacral fractures were initially enrolled, with a mean age of 40 years and mean injury severity score of 16. One hundred twenty-three patients completed the 2-year follow-up as follows: 29 DN, 30 DO, 47 NN, and 17 NO with 56% loss to follow-up at 2 years. Highest dysfunction was seen at 3 months for all groups with mean SMFA dysfunction scores: 25 DN, 28 DO, 27 NN, and 31 NO. The mean SMFA scores at 2 years for all groups were 13 DN, 12 DO, 17 NN, and 17 NO.

CONCLUSIONS

All groups (operative/nonoperative and displaced/nondisplaced) reported worst function 3 months after injury, and all but (DN) continued to recover for 2 years after injury, with peak recovery for DN seen at 1 year. No functional benefit was seen with operative intervention for either displaced or nondisplaced injuries at any time point.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

A computed tomography based survey study investigating the agreement of the therapeutic strategy for fragility fractures of the pelvis

Treatment recommendations for fragility fractures of the pelvis (FFP) have been provided along with the good reliable FFP classification but they are not proven in large studies and recent reports challenge these recommendations. Thus, we aimed to determine the usefulness of the FFP classification determining the treatment strategy and favored procedures in six level 1 trauma centers. Sixty cases of FFP were evaluated by six experienced pelvic surgeons, six inexperienced surgeons in training, and one surgeon trained by the originator of the FFP classification during three repeating sessions using computed tomography scans with multiplanar reconstruction. The intra-rater reliability and inter-rater reliability for therapeutic decisions (non-operative treatment vs. operative treatment) were moderate, with Fleiss kappa coefficients of 0.54 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44–0.62) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.34–0.49). We found a therapeutic disagreement predominantly for FFP II related to a preferred operative therapy for FFP II. Operative treated cases were generally treated with an anterior–posterior fixation. Despite the consensus on an anterior–posterior fixation, the chosen procedures are highly variable and most plausible based on the surgeon’s preference.

Contributions of Pubic Rami Fracture Morphology and Fixation to Pelvic Ring Stability in Type 1 Lateral Compression Injuries: A Biomechanical Cadaveric Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment of lateral compression type 1 (LC-1) injuries has historically been nonoperative with immediate weight-bearing. However, management of these injuries remains controversial, with reports of displacement at follow-up for nonoperatively managed LC-1 fractures. The goal of our study was to determine the effect of superior pubic ramus fracture morphology and fixation construct on pelvic stability.

METHODS

Ten fresh-frozen cadaveric were transected into hemi-pelvises. Incomplete Denis type 1 sacral fractures were made. Hemi-pelvises were randomized to receive a transverse-type or oblique-type superior pubic ramus fracture with the contralateral hemi-pelvis receiving the opposing morphology. A lateral load to 135N was applied with an Instron materials testing machine and lateral displacement of the hemi-pelvis was recorded. Deflection and stiffness were calculated. Statistical analysis was conducted using a t test assuming unequal variances with an alpha = 0.05.

RESULTS

Oblique-type superior pubic ramus fractures allowed more deflection compared with transverse-type fractures in the absence of fixation (P = 0.018). The posterior-only and combined anterior and posterior fixation configurations on average reduced deflection more than no fixation or anterior fixation only. In all fixation configuration cases, the average deflection for transverse-type fractures was less than that of the oblique-type fractures.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that displacement of LC-1 pelvic injuries may be related to pubic rami fracture morphology. When looking at initial injury imaging, oblique-type pubic rami fractures may suggest an increased potential for displacement over time. In such cases, we recommend an examination under anesthesia to evaluate for underlying instability and consideration for fixation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level V.

Unstable minimally displaced lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries have a similar hospital course as intertrochanteric femur fractures

INTRODUCTION

The purpose of this study was to evaluate how the hospital course of minimally displaced LC1 fractures, with and without occult instability, compares with that of intertrochanteric femur fractures.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Retrospective comparative cohort analysis at an urban level one trauma center of 40 consecutive patients with an isolated LC1 pelvic ring injury and 40 age/sex matched patients with an isolated intertrochanteric femur fracture was performed. Medical records and radiographs were reviewed for patient and injury characteristics, including demographics, displacement, time to surgery, ambulation, physical therapy (PT) clearance, hospital length of stay (LOS), and inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

The LC1 pelvic ring injury group included 26 (65%) patients with ≥ 10 mm of displacement on lateral stress radiographs. The unstable LC1 group, compared to the stable LC1 group, had a greater LOS (median difference (MD): 2 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1 to 4, p = 0.0004), longer time to ambulate 15 feet (MD: 1 day, CI: 1 to 2, p = 0.0002), longer time to clear PT (MD: 2 days, CI: 1 to 3, p = 0.0003), and more inpatient MMEs (MD: 386 MME, CI: 225.8 to 546.7, p = 0.0002). The unstable LC1 and intertrochanteric fracture groups had no detectable differences in LOS (p = 0.24), days to ambulate 15 feet (p = 0.46), days to clear PT (p = 0.95), and inpatient MMEs (p = 0.06).

CONCLUSION

Patients with minimally displaced unstable LC1 injuries had worse hospital courses than stable LC1 injuries and similar hospital courses as intertrochanteric femur fractures. These findings emphasize the associated morbidity of unstable LC1 injuries.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective cohort study.

A Prospective Clinical Trial Comparing Surgical Fixation Versus Nonoperative Management of Minimally Displaced Complete Lateral Compression Pelvis Fractures

OBJECTIVE

To compare the early pain and functional outcomes of operative fixation versus nonoperative management for minimally displaced complete lateral compression (LC; OTA/AO 61-B1/B2) pelvic fractures.

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial.

SETTING

Two academic trauma centers.

PATIENTS

Forty-eight adult patients with LC pelvic ring injuries with <10 mm of displacement were treated nonoperatively and 47 with surgical fixation. Sixty percent of participants were randomized. Seventy-three percent of the fractures were displaced <5 mm, and 71% were LC-1 patterns.

INTERVENTION

Operative fixation versus nonoperative management.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS

The primary outcome was patient-reported pain using the 10-point Brief Pain Inventory. Functional outcome was measured using the Majeed pelvic score. Outcomes were analyzed using hierarchical Bayesian models to compare the average treatment effect from injury to 12 and 52 weeks postinjury. The probability of the mean treatment benefit exceeding a clinically important difference was determined.

RESULTS

The 3-month average treatment effect of surgery compared with nonoperative management was a 1.2-point reduction in pain [95% credible interval (CrI): 0.4-1.9] and an 8% absolute improvement in the Majeed score (95% CrI: 3%-14%). Similar results persisted to 1 year. Patients with initial fracture displacement ≥5 mm experienced a larger reduction in pain (2.2, 95% CrI: 0.9-3.5) compared with those patients with less initial displacement (0.9, 95% CrI: 0.1-1.8).

CONCLUSION

On average, surgical fixation likely provides a small improvement in pain and functional outcome for up to 12 months. Patients with ≥5 mm of posterior pelvic ring displacement are more likely to experience clinically important improvements in pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) pelvic ring injuries: a spectrum of fracture types and treatment algorithms

Lateral compression type 1 (LC1) fractures are the commonest pelvic ring injury. However, they represent a heterogenous spectrum of injury mechanisms and fracture patterns, resulting in a lack of strong evidence for a universally agreed treatment algorithm. Although consensus exists that LC1 fractures have a preserved posterior ligamentous complex and are vertically stable, controversy persists around defining internal rotational instability. As such, treatment strategies extend from routine non-operative management through to dynamic imaging such as examination under anaesthetic (EUA) or stress radiographs to guide fixation algorithm. Multiple protocols sit between these two, all with slightly different thresholds for advocating surgery or otherwise, exemplifying a broad lack of consensus that is not seen for other, more severe, grades of pelvic ring injury. In the following review we discuss the evolving concepts of pelvic ring instability and management, starting from a historical perspective, through to current trends and controversies in LC1 fracture treatment. Emerging directions for research and emerging pharmacological and surgical treatments/technologies are also considered and expert commentary from 3 leading centres provided. The distinction is made between LC1 fracture arising from high-energy trauma and those following low-energy falls from standing height (so-called fragility fractures of the pelvis-FFP), since these two patient groups have different functional requirements and medical vulnerabilities. Issues pertaining to FFP are considered separately.

The incidence of pelvic fractures and related surgery in the Finnish adult population: a nationwide study of 33,469 patients between 1997 and 2014

Background and purpose - Information on the epidemiological trends of pelvic fractures and fracture surgery in the general population is limited. We therefore determined the incidence of pelvic fractures in the Finnish adult population between 1997 and 2014 and assessed the incidence and trends of fracture surgery.Patients and methods - We used data from the Finnish National Discharge Register (NHDR) to calculate the incidence of pelvic fractures and fracture surgery. All patients 18 years of age or older were included in the study. The NHDR covers the whole Finnish population and gives information on health care services and the surgical procedures performed.Results and interpretation - We found that in Finnish adults the overall incidence of hospitalization for a pelvic fracture increased from 34 to 56/100,000 person-years between 1997 and 2014. This increase was most apparent for the low-energy fragility fractures of the elderly female population. The ageing of the population is likely therefore to partly explain this increase. The annual number and incidence of pelvic fracture surgery also rose between 1997 and 2014, from 118 (number) and 3.0 (incidence) in 1997 to 187 and 4.3 in 2014, respectively. The increasing number and incidence of pelvic fractures in the elderly population will increase the need for social and healthcare services. The main focus should be on fracture prevention.

Assessment of instability in type B pelvic ring fractures

Pelvic ring fractures have increased in incidence and operative fixation over the past several decades. These are dynamic injuries but decisions on operative management are still often made on the basis of static imaging. Expert opinion varies greatly on which injuries require fixation and how much fixation. Examination under anaesthesia has been shown to guide management of pelvic injuries by more accurately assessing levels of instability.