Evaluation of a systematic approach to pediatric back pain: the utility of magnetic resonance imaging

Optimizing Advanced Imaging of the Pediatric Patient in the Emergency Department: Technical Report

Advanced diagnostic imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, are key components in the evaluation and management of pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department. Advances in imaging technology have led to the availability of faster and more accurate tools to improve patient care. Notwithstanding these advances, it is important for physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners to understand the risks and limitations associated with advanced imaging in children and to limit imaging studies that are considered low value, when possible. This technical report provides a summary of imaging strategies for specific conditions where advanced imaging is commonly considered in the emergency department. As an accompaniment to the policy statement, this document provides resources and strategies to optimize advanced imaging, including clinical decision support mechanisms, teleradiology, shared decision-making, and rationale for deferred imaging for patients who will be transferred for definitive care.

Optimizing Advanced Imaging of the Pediatric Patient in the Emergency Department: Technical Report

Advanced diagnostic imaging modalities, including ultrasonography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), are key components in the evaluation and management of pediatric patients presenting to the emergency department. Advances in imaging technology have led to the availability of faster and more accurate tools to improve patient care. Notwithstanding these advances, it is important for physicians, physician assistants, and nurse practitioners to understand the risks and limitations associated with advanced imaging in children and to limit imaging studies that are considered low value, when possible. This technical report provides a summary of imaging strategies for specific conditions where advanced imaging is commonly considered in the emergency department. As an accompaniment to the policy statement, this document provides resources and strategies to optimize advanced imaging, including clinical decision support mechanisms, teleradiology, shared decision-making, and rationale for deferred imaging for patients who will be transferred for definitive care.

Assessing need for advance imaging among children with back pain using pain intensity as clinical marker

INTRODUCTION

Pediatric back pain evaluation nowadays relies on patient history, physical examination, and plain radiographs to identify underlying pathologies. Constant pain, night pain, radicular pain, and abnormal neurological examination were previously recommended as clinical markers to assess the need for magnetic resonance imaging evaluation. Recent studies have challenged the use of these clinical markers, recommending further studies. This study aimed to assess pain intensity as a predictor of underlying magnetic resonance imaging pathology in children with back pain.

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study of pediatric patients between 8 and 17 years with back pain for more than 4 weeks from 2009 to 2021 was conducted. A whole spine magnetic resonance imaging was performed on patients with back pain without an identifiable cause and no prior spine treatment. The numerical rating scale questionnaire was administered to each patient, and answers were divided into three groups: mild (1-3), moderate (4-6), and severe (7-10) numerical rating scale score. Student's t-test and chi-square analysis were used to correlate differences between continuous and categorical values, respectively.

RESULTS

Of 590 patients (70% female and a mean age of 15.25 years), there were 35.1% of patients had a magnetic resonance imaging underlying pathology. No association was found between severe numerical rating scale score and the presence of underlying MRI pathology (p = 0.666). Patients with low or moderate numerical rating scale scores had similar associations to an underlying magnetic resonance imaging pathology as patients with a severe numerical rating scale score (p = 0.256; p = 0.357, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Back pain intensity was not found to be an effective clinical marker for predicting underlying magnetic resonance imaging pathology in pediatric patients with back pain.

Investigation of Spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging Results of Pediatric Patients Presenting with Low Back Pain

Objective: Low back pain in pediatric patients can be severe in terms of its consequences and should be investigated. In this study, the etiology of pediatric low back pain was examined, and it was evaluated whether there was a relationship between age and gender. Material and Methods: In this study, 228 patients under 18 who applied to Şanlıurfa Training and Research Hospital Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation and Brain and Nerve Surgery polyclinics complained of low back pain and underwent spinal Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in 2021 were analyzed retrospectively. Results: The ages of 228 patients included in our study ranged from 4 to 18 years, with a mean age of 12.8±2.5. 54.8% of the cases were male (n=125), 45.2% (n=103) were female. While MRI findings were not observed in 92 cases, MRI findings were found in 136 cases. Disc pathology was detected in 44.7% (n=102) of the cases, and structural pathology was found in 14.9% (n=36). The most common disc pathology was bulging, constituting 32.9% (n=75) of the cases. There was no significant difference between the genders of the cases according to the incidence of disc pathology (p=0.434). When age and incidence of disc pathology were evaluated, the age of the group with disc pathology was significantly higher than the group without disc pathology (p

Pediatric Back Pain: A Scoring System to Guide Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of back pain in the pediatric population is increasing, and the workup of these patients presents a clinical challenge. Many cases are selflimited, but failure to diagnose a pathology that requires clinical intervention can carry severe repercussions. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) carries a high cost to the patient and health care system, and may even require procedural sedation in the pediatric population. The aim of this study was to develop a scoring system based on pediatric patient factors to help determine when an MRI will change clinical management.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort analysis of consecutive pediatric patients who presented to clinic with a chief complaint of back pain between 2010 and 2018 at single orthopaedic surgery practice. Comprehensive demographic and presentation variables were collected. A predictive model of factors that influence whether MRI results in a change in management was then generated using cross-validation least absolute shrinkage and selection operator logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 729 patients were included, with a mean age of 15.1 years (range: 3 to 20 y). Of these, 344 (47.2%) had an MRI. A predictive model was generated, with nocturnal symptoms (5 points), neurological deficit (10 points), age (0.7 points per year), lumbar pain (2 points), sudden onset of pain (3.25 points), and leg pain (3.75 points) identified as significant predictors. A combined score of greater than 9.5 points for a given patient is highly suggestive that an MRI will result in a change in clinical management (specificity: 0.93; positive predictive value: 0.92).

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive model was generated to help determine when ordering an MRI may result in a change in clinical management for workup of back pain in the pediatric population. The main factors included the presence of a neurological deficit, nocturnal symptoms, sudden onset, leg pain, lumbar pain, and age. Care providers can use these findings to better determine if and when an MRI might be appropriate.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-diagnostic study.

Formulation of Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain- the revised 2019 edition

BACKGROUND

The latest clinical guidelines are mandatory for physicians to follow when practicing evidence-based medicine in the treatment of low back pain. Those guidelines should target not only Japanese board-certified orthopaedic surgeons, but also primary physicians, and they should be prepared based entirely on evidence-based medicine. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline committee decided to update the guideline and launched the formulation committee. The purpose of this study was to describe the formulation we implemented for the revision of the guideline with the latest data of evidence-based medicine.

METHODS

The Japanese Orthopaedic Association Low Back Pain guideline formulation committee revised the previous guideline based on a method for preparing clinical guidelines in Japan proposed by Medical Information Network Distribution Service Handbook for Clinical Practice Guideline Development 2014. Two key phrases, "body of evidence" and "benefit and harm balance" were focused on in the revised version. Background and clinical questions were determined, followed by literature search related to each question. Appropriate articles were selected from all the searched literature. Structured abstracts were prepared, and then meta-analyses were performed. The strength of both the body of evidence and the recommendation was decided by the committee members.

RESULTS

Nine background and nine clinical qvuestions were determined. For each clinical question, outcomes from the literature were collected and meta-analysis was performed. Answers and explanations were described for each clinical question, and the strength of the recommendation was decided. For background questions, the recommendations were described based on previous literature.

CONCLUSIONS

The 2019 clinical practice guideline for the management of low back pain was completed according to the latest evidence-based medicine. We strongly hope that this guideline serves as a benchmark for all physicians, as well as patients, in the management of low back pain.

Is the numerical rating scale an adequate predictor for assessing MRI underlying pathologies among painful adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients?

The use of constant pain and night pain as clinical markers for predicting the presence of underlying pathology in painful adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients has been questioned. Pain intensity has been recognized as an important domain in pain assessment. The numerical rating scale (NRS) is one of the most commonly validated tools to assess pain intensity in children above 8 years of age. The aim of this study was to assess the NRS as a predictor of underlying pathologies found by MRI in painful AIS patients. A cross-sectional study comprising of all AIS patients with back pain lasting >4 weeks from April 2015 to April 2019 was performed. An MRI was performed on each AIS patient presenting with back pain after a nondiagnostic history, physical examination and spinal X-ray. The pain was graded using the NRS, ranging from 0 to 10. Patients were divided into three groups: NRS (1-3), NRS (4-6) and NRS (7-10). Variables, including gender, age, scoliosis magnitude and presence of underlying pathology, were compared between the groups. A total of 186 AIS patients were evaluated in the study, were 66/186 (35.5%) of them had underlying pathologies. The mean age of subjects was 14.7 years, 85% being female. An underlying pathology was identified in 4/11 (36.4%) with NRS (1-3), 28/82 (34.2%) with NRS (4-6) and 34/93 (36.6%) with NRS (7-10) (P = 0.94). The use of an NRS was not found to be an adequate predictor for identifying an underlying pathology via MRI in painful AIS patients.

Lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration, end-plates and paraspinal muscle changes in children and adolescents with low-back pain

The prevalence of low-back pain (LBP) in adolescents ranges from 7 to 72%. We aimed to define the radiologic characteristics of the lumbar spine in children and adolescents with LBP with/without leg pain. Two hundred and fourteen children and adolescents, who were born between 2001 and 2009 and had lumbar spine MRI for LBP with/without leg pain, were evaluated in terms of intervertebral disc degeneration (IVDD), end-plates and paraspinal muscle changes on lumbar spine MRIs. Severe IVDD was detected at all lumbar levels except for L2-L3. Modic changes were present in 4.2% of the patients. Modic changes were more common in patients with severe IVDD than in those with mild-to-moderate IVDD. Severe IVDD was significantly associated with Modic changes at the corresponding L1-L2 and L3-L4 disc levels. Girls had significantly more fatty infiltration in the paraspinal muscles when compared to boys. The risk of having severe IVDD concomitant with Modic changes was high [odds ratio (OR), 8.6]. The OR was 20.7 for predicting the presence of severe IVDD at any level if Modic changes presented particularly at the L3-L4 level. The ORs of Modic changes presented at any lumbar level at the background of fat-infiltrated multifidus at L3-L4 and L4-L5 levels were 8.3 and 9.1, respectively. Fatty infiltration in the paraspinal muscles and IVDD were closely associated with Modic changes in children and adolescents with LBP. Lumbar IVDD in children and adolescents could be the result of a mechanical pathology.

Pediatric back pain-Diagnostic algorithm

BACKGROUND

Back pain in the pediatric population is common. History and a thorough physical examination and a systematic work-up approach are key components to guide the physician in evaluating the possible causes of pain and providing appropriate treatment.

OBJECTIVE

The main aim of this review was to develop an algorithmic approach to assist physicians in the assessment of pediatric back pain. A comprehensive review of prevalence, differential diagnoses and proper management of pediatric back pain are also presented.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed in PubMed to gather articles on the prevalence, risk factors, diagnostic tools, differential diagnoses and appropriate management of pediatric back pain.

RESULTS

Available literature revealed that pediatric back pain is a common complaint. Although most cases are non-specific and self-limiting, there is a wide differential that should be considered including inflammatory, neoplastic, infectious and mechanical causes. Sedentary lifestyle, obesity and vigorous physical activity have been shown to increase the likelihood of developing back pain. We proposed an algorithm to guide the physician's decision about the next step in the diagnostic process.

CONCLUSION

A well-defined strategy in the diagnostic process is needed in approaching children/adolescents with back pain. This would have the benefit of minimizing costs, unnecessary tests and child/family anxiety as well as increasing the likelihood of early diagnosis and proper treatment.

Low Back Pain in Adolescent and Geriatric Populations

Spinal pain is the most common form of musculoskeletal pain. Chronic low back pain may contain nociceptive, neuropathic, and central components. Children are at risk of developing spinal pain. An increasing proportion of children develop low back pain as they become adolescents. In most adolescents, no specific diagnosis is identified. Psychological factors play a role in adolescents with back pain. Lumbar spinal stenosis causes neurogenic claudication in older patients. Magnetic resonance imaging is the best radiographic technique to detect nerve compression. Surgical decompression with or without fusion may offer greater short-term benefit but may not be significantly better than medical therapy.

Global incidence of spinal perineural Tarlov's cysts and their morphological characteristics: a meta-analysis of 13,266 subjects

BACKGROUND

Spinal perineural Tarlov's cysts (TCs) are considered incidental findings that occasionally might exert pressure upon nerve roots and correspond with patients' signs and symptoms. Purpose of this meta-analysis is to deliver global incidence and characteristics (location, size, and shape) of TCs.

METHODS

Following PRISMA checklist, all major databases were searched by two authors for radiologic studies reporting incidence and morphologic features (location, size, and shape) of TCs. Anatomical Quality Assessment tool was applied for risk of bias evaluation. Meta-analysis of random-effects model was employed. Subgroup analysis for regional distribution, gender, sacral levels, age, correspondence with symptoms, and persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) were planned ahead.

RESULTS

22 radiologic studies of level 3 evidence involving 13,266 subjects were included. Global pooled prevalence of TCs was 4.18% (95% CI 2.47-6.30). Mean pooled sagittal diameter was 11.86 mm (95% CI 10.78-12.93). Sacral cysts strongly prevailed over the other segments. Of the sacral, S2 level was the most common (46.7% [95% CI 29.4-60.5]). Geographically, the highest incidence was found in Europe (6.07% [95% CI 1.49-13.00]), followed by North America (3.82% [95% CI 0.49-9.44]), and Asia (3.33% [95% CI 1.52-5.75]). TCs were more common in women than in men (5.84% vs 3.03%, p < 0.001, test of homogeneity, χ²). Subjects with PGAD had incidence of 37.87% (95% CI 2.45-81.75). TCs in pediatric population are rare-0.53% (95% CI 0.02-1.51). 15.59% of TCs corresponded with symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

Spinal perineural (Tarlov) cysts are found in a minority of population. S2 level of the sacral bone is affected most frequently. There is female predominance. Correspondence with symptoms is seen in less than one-fifth of TCs. Studies with stronger evidence level are needed to corroborate the results. The purported high incidence in PGAD requires confirmation in case-control studies for the risk-ratio calculation.

The role of radiography in the study of spinal disorders

Despite the growing use of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the study of spinal disorders, radiography still plays an important role in many conditions affecting the spine. However, the study and interpretation of spine radiograph is receiving less attention and radiologists are increasingly unfamiliar with the typical findings in normal and pathologic conditions of the spine. The aim of this article is to review the radiologic indications of radiograph in different pathologic conditions that affect the spine, including congenital, traumatic, degenerative, inflammatory, infectious and tumour disorders, as well as their main radiographic manifestations.

Annual Trends and Geographic Variation in the Utilization of Imaging in Pediatric Patients with Low Back Pain in the United States

BACKGROUND

Low back pain (LBP) is increasing in the pediatric population. Advanced imaging, such as computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, performed for LBP imposes significant costs with little benefit. We investigated annual trends and demographic and geographic variation in spinal imaging for first-time pediatric presenters with LBP in primary care clinics.

METHODS

We queried a private administrative claims database for patients presenting with LBP who underwent plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging from 2011 to 2017. We used a Cochrane Armitage test of trend to determine significant annual variation in diagnostic imaging utilization during the study period. The χ² test was used to determine demographic and geographic variation.

RESULTS

The study included 67,423 patients with mean age 15.2 ± 3 years. There was no significant change in radiography (34.8% in 2011 vs. 35.5% in 2017, P = 0.795) or computed tomography (1.6% in 2011 vs. 1.1% in 2017, P = 0.073), but there was a significant increase in magnetic resonance imaging (3.3% in 2011 vs. 4.5% in 2017, P = 0.017). Overall, there was no significant change in total imaging use (P = 0.895). Boys had higher rates of imaging compared with girls (40.2% vs. 35.6%, P < 0.001). Imaging rates significantly varied between regions across the United States (P < 0.001). The Midwest had the highest imaging rates (41%), while the Northeast had the lowest rates (31%).

CONCLUSIONS

There was significant demographic and geographic variation but no significant annual change in total diagnostic spinal imaging for pediatric patients with LBP between 2011 and 2017, with rates of advanced imaging remaining relatively low.

The Prevalence of Abnormalities in the Pediatric Spine on MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to provide an overview of the prevalence of reported musculoskeletal abnormalities on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the pediatric spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Back pain is a common complaint and significant health issue, already in children. Several studies have investigated musculoskeletal abnormalities of the pediatric spine as possible cause of low back pain (LBP). However, it is not clear which abnormalities are the most prevalent among children.

METHODS

A systematic literature search on the prevalence of musculoskeletal spinal abnormalities on MRI in children was conducted in the Embase, Medline Ovid, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases. Risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using a checklist based on the Downs and Black checklist. General information on study and patient characteristics and the prevalence of spinal abnormalities were extracted from the studies. Prevalence data were presented in three subgroups: nonathletes without LBP, participants with LBP, and athletes. Prevalence data of the most reported abnormalities were pooled using random-effects proportion meta-analysis. The study protocol was prospectively registered in PROSPERO (CRD42017080543).

RESULTS

The search resulted in 16,783 articles, of which 31 articles (2373 participants) were included in this systematic review. Two-thirds of the studies had a low RoB. The pooled prevalence in nonathletes without LBP, participants with LBP, and athletes without LBP was respectively 22%, 44%, and 22% for disc degeneration, 1%, 38%, and 13% for herniated discs, 5%, 22%, and 11% for endplate changes, and 0%, 30%, and 6% for pars fractures.

CONCLUSION

Disc degeneration, herniated discs, endplate changes, and spondylolysis are the most reported spinal abnormalities on MRI in children in literature. Spinal abnormalities seen in adults are already prevalent in children with LBP, with the highest prevalence for disc degeneration and herniated discs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Prevalence and clinical relevance of underlying pathological conditions in painful adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: a MRI-based study

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-sectional comparative study.

OBJECTIVES

Evaluate prevalence and clinical relevance of an underlying pathology in painful adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) patients after a non-diagnostic history, physical examination and spinal X-ray using Magnetic Resonance Image (MRI) as diagnostic tool. Discrepancies regarding indications of routine MRI screening in painful AIS patients are multifactorial. Few studies have investigated relationship and practical importance of painful AIS with an underlying pathology by MRI.

METHOD

A total of 152-consecutive AIS patients complaining of back pain during a 36-month period were enrolled. All patients underwent whole-spine MRI after a non-diagnostic history, physical examination and spinal X-ray. Underlying pathologies were reported as neural and non-neural axis abnormalities based on MRI reports. Variables such as sex, age, constant or intermittent pain, night pain, back pain location (thoracic or lumbar pain), Cobb-angle and follow-up were evaluated as clinical markers to predict presence of underlying MRI pathologies.

RESULTS

The presence of an underlying pathology was found by MRI in 54 painful AIS patients (35.5%). Isolated syringomyelia was the only neural axis abnormality found in 6 patients (3.9%). Non-neural axis abnormalities (31.6%) were composed by: 32 herniated nucleus pulposus, 5 vertebral disc desiccation, 4 ovarian cysts, 3 renal cysts, 2 sacral cysts, and 2 vertebral hemangiomas. There was no association with gender, age of presentation, initial coronal Cobb angle and follow up; with presence of an underlying pathology. Lumbar pain location was identified as an adequate clinical marker that correlated with presence of an underlying pathology (p = 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Prevalence of underlying pathologies diagnosed by MRI in painful AIS was found high (35.5%), but it's clinical relevance and implication are debatable. The use of MRI did not affect orthopedic management of painful AIS patients who showed an underlying pathology. A thorough evaluation must be performed by clinicians; and discussed with patients and family prior to undergo further imaging management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Common neoplastic causes of paediatric and adolescent back pain

Neoplasm of the spinal column in children is rare, but can involve either benign or malignant tumours. Early detection of malignant tumours is key to successful clinical outcome and long-term prognosis. In such cases, back pain is a common presenting symptom, but often has a non-neoplastic cause. Therefore, it is important for GPs and trainees who encounter paediatric patients to be aware of the clinical entity to be able to thoroughly assess them in clinical practice. This article discusses the types of paediatric spinal neoplasms, anatomical-based classification, clinical red flags, imaging modalities and outlines brief management options.

Characteristics and Treatment of Pediatric Patients in an Osteopathic Manipulative Medicine Clinic

Context

Osteopathic manipulative medicine (OMM) is recognized as an adjunctive medical approach for the treatment of pediatric patients, but few studies have detailed the pediatric conditions that prompt the use of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) or the types and frequency of OMT used.

Objective

To present descriptive data of pediatric patients receiving OMT from a neuromusculoskeletal medicine/OMM outpatient clinic.

Methods

Data were drawn from electronic health records from a single outpatient specialty clinic for pediatric clinical encounters involving OMT that took place between January 1, 2014, and December 31, 2016. Encounter notes and billing records were reviewed for demographic information, presenting complaints, clinical assessments, somatic dysfunction assessments, OMT techniques used, and payment method. Data were categorized by patient age and analyzed.

Results

Five hundred thirty-seven pediatric patients (321 girls, 216 boys) received OMT during the study. These patients accounted for 1688 clinical encounters (1106 for girls, 582 for boys). Mean (SD) number of encounters was 2.7 (1.3) encounters for boys and 3.5 (1.1) encounters for girls. A higher percentage of patients younger than age 2 were boys, while a higher percentage of patients older than age 2 were girls (both P=.005). Musculoskeletal complaints and assessments were the most common for children aged 6 years and older; misshapen head, feeding difficulties, and colic were the most frequently reported for children younger than 6 years. There were 8557 somatic dysfunction assessments documented; thoracic and cervical somatic dysfunction were most commonly assessed. There were 8485 OMT techniques documented, and myofascial release was most frequently used. Encounters with self-pay patients (n=72) involved fewer somatic dysfunction assessments (P<.001) than encounters with patients using private insurance (n=1060) or Medicaid (n=542).

Conclusion

The electronic health records reviewed in the current study revealed descriptive data of pediatric patients presenting to an OMM clinic; these data were rarely documented in previous literature. They may be used by clinicians to better understand the role of OMM as a pediatric adjunctive medical approach and to identify conditions to target for future outcome studies based on common presenting complaints.

Evaluating low back pain in adolescents

Low back pain in adolescents is a common complaint in primary care. With an average prevalence rate of 40%, adolescent low back pain correlates with greater healthcare use, higher incidences of adult back pain, and negative effects on overall well-being. A thorough history and physical examination can increase early detection and accurate diagnosis while ensuring the judicious use of diagnostic modalities. Although underlying serious pathology is rare in adolescents with low back pain, clinicians should recognize specific signs and symptoms that necessitate urgent evaluation and intervention. This article emphasizes the value of using a thorough history and physical examination to guide the initial diagnostic workup and to enhance the early detection and accurate diagnosis of adolescents who present with low back pain.

Are Constant Pain, Night Pain, or Abnormal Neurological Examination Adequate Predictors of the Presence of a Significant Pathology Associated With Pediatric Back Pain?

INTRODUCTION

Previous studies have suggested that most cases of pediatric back pain do not have an identifiable cause. No reliable sign or indication differentiates between a benign or serious cause of the symptom. Constant pain, night pain, and abnormal neurological examination have been suggested as adequate predictors of an identifiable cause, when plain radiographs could not explain the symptoms. The purpose of this study is to determine the sensitivity, specificity, and likelihood ratios of constant pain, night pain, and abnormal neurological examination to predict the presence of an underlying positive finding as a cause of back pain.

METHOD

From 2010 to 2016, all patients who presented with a chief complaint of back pain were included in the study. Magnetic Resonance Image was performed to all patients presenting with back pain without identifiable cause lasting >4 weeks. Patients who presented with spondylolysis were treated accordingly base on radiographic findings and were excluded as study protocol.

RESULTS

A total of 388 patients were evaluated during the study period. The mean age of the subjects was 14.5 years; 69.7% being female. An underlying pathologic condition was identified in 56 of 132 (42%) of patients with constant pain, 61 of 162 (38%) with night pain, and 8 of 9 (89%) with abnormal neurological examination. Probability to have an underlying pathology correlated directly with the amount of clinical markers.

DISCUSSION

An abnormal neurological examination was found as a strong predictor for an underlying pathologic condition. Further imaging of a pediatric patient with back pain without clear explanation for their symptoms on plain radiographs should not be limited to constant pain, or night pain because clinicians could be missing important diagnosis. Therefore, the clinician cannot be assured by absence of these clinical markers, that there is no underlying spinal pathology.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

The Use of Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Plain Radiographs Among Adolescents With Back Pain and Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

Background

Low back pain (LBP) and adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) are common pediatric diagnoses. The workup for these diagnoses can be highly variable and can use significant health care resources. There has been no analysis to date on the use of imaging for workup of AIS and/or LBP.

Methods

The Humana Private Payer Database was queried for clinical and financial information for patients with AIS and/or LBP using International Classification of Diseases (ICD-9) for LBP and AIS. Current procedural terminology codes related to magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and radiographs for the thoracolumbar spine were used to identify patients with LBP and/or AIS that used these diagnostic imaging modalities. Only patients ages 10 to 19 years were included in this analysis.

Results

The total number of patients with AIS and LBP was 18 696 and 56 560, respectively. Thoracolumbar imaging was used within the workup for 71.76% and 45.53% of patients with AIS alone and LBP alone, respectively. MRI was used for 2.92% and 9.53% of patients with AIS alone and LBP alone, respectively. Radiographic imaging was used for 71.06% and 42.63% for AIS alone and LBP alone, respectively. There was minimal variation among regions in use of MRI for AIS. For patients with LBP, the diagnosis with the highest use of MRI was "sciatica" (29.07%). Patients with both LBP and AIS had statistically higher rates of imaging (91.04%), MRI (18.99%), and radiographs (89.71%). Among patients with an MRI, 20.87% never had a radiograph. Reimbursement per patient for radiographs was $164 and $239 for AIS and LBP, respectively. Reimbursement per patient for MRI was $1,263 and $1,882 for AIS and LBP, respectively.

Conclusions

There is substantial use of both MRI and radiographs for adolescents with LBP and/or AIS. Clinicians should be aware of the impact these diagnostic tests have on the patient and the overall health care system.

Back Pain in a Pediatric Emergency Department: Etiology and Evaluation

OBJECTIVES

Back pain is an uncommon chief complaint in the pediatric emergency department (ED). However, there are serious underlying conditions requiring prompt diagnosis and treatment. While the etiology is usually benign, variation exists in the evaluation. The study purpose was to describe pediatric patients who presented to the ED with back pain and evaluate for associations with laboratory and radiologic abnormalities indicative of underlying musculoskeletal pathology.

METHODS

A retrospective review was conducted of patients aged birth to 18 years who presented to a pediatric ED with a chief complaint of back pain during a 1-year period. Primary outcome was discharge diagnosis, categorized as nonpathologic back pain, pathologic back pain, and other etiologies. Descriptive statistics were used.

RESULTS

Two-hundred thirty-two patient encounters were reviewed, with 177 included in data analysis. A nonpathologic diagnosis of back pain was found in 76.8% of visits. Back pain and back or muscle strain were the most common diagnoses. Pathologic back pain diagnoses represented 2.3% of visits. Radiologic imaging was performed in 37.9%. Positive findings were noted in 16.9% of radiographs; no abnormalities were noted on computed tomography scan or magnetic resonance imaging. Laboratory studies were conducted in 35%. Abnormal plain radiographs were associated with a pathologic diagnosis of back pain (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Most pediatric patients presenting to the ED with back pain were found to have a nonpathologic etiology and were discharged. Among those with a pathologic back pain diagnosis, abnormal radiograph findings were the only statistically significant factor, whereas laboratory studies, computed tomography scans, and magnetic resonance imaging scans were less indicative.

Low Back Pain in Adolescents: A 1-Year Analysis of Eventual Diagnoses

BACKGROUND

Back pain in adolescents is very common and often seen in the office for evaluation of potential spinal pathology. Pediatric back pain has often thought to be from serious identifiable causes such as spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, tumor, or infection. A follow-up analysis of adolescents initially presenting with back pain to their eventual subsequent diagnosis within 1 year has not been reported on a large scale with a national sample.

METHODS

A national insurance database (PearlDiver Patient Records Database) was queried for ICD-9 codes to identify patients aged 10 to 19 years with back pain from 2007 to 2010. These patients were tracked for imaging obtained, and eventual development of subsequent associated spinal pathology diagnoses using CPT and ICD-9 codes for up to 1 year after initial presentation.

RESULTS

A total of 215,592 adolescents were identified presenting with low back pain (LBP) from 2007 to 2010. Over 80% of adolescents with LBP had no identifiable diagnosis within 1 year. The most common associated subsequent diagnoses were lumbar strain/spasm (8.9%), followed by scoliosis (4.7%), lumbar degenerative disk disease (1.7%), and lumbar disk herniation (1.3%). The rates of all other diagnoses including spondylolysis, spondylolisthesis, infection, tumor, and fracture had <1% association with LBP.

CONCLUSIONS

In conclusion, adolescent LBP is a common diagnosis for which underlying serious pathology is rare. The most common diagnosis aside from strain or muscle spasm associated with LBP are scoliosis and degenerative disk disease. Pediatric orthopaedists often are consulted on patients with LBP and should always have high suspicion for potential serious spinal pathology, but should recognize the most common etiologies of back pain in adolescence.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV-case series.

The prevalence of degenerative or incidental findings in the lumbar spine of pediatric patients: a study using magnetic resonance imaging as a screening tool

PURPOSE

Several studies using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to evaluate the lumbar spine in adults have shown a large prevalence of degenerative changes in asymptomatic subjects; however, studies in pediatric patients are scarce. Those studies have suggested a lower rate of degenerative findings in adolescents than in adults, but the actual prevalence of MRI findings in the pediatric population has not yet been determined. We aimed to determine the prevalence of degenerative changes in the lumbar spine of pediatric patients using abdominal and pelvic MRI as the screening tool.

METHODS

We studied 103 patients (mean age 6.6 years) who were evaluated with abdominal and pelvic MRI for indications that were not spine related. The entire lumbo-sacral spine was evaluated to detect the presence of disc degeneration (DD), disc displacement, anular rupture with high-intensity zone (HIZ) and Modic changes.

RESULTS

In our population, 10.7 % [4.9-16.5] had at least one disc classified as Pfirrmann 2, and no patients presented discs classified as Pfirrmann 3, 4 or 5; patients exhibiting discs classified as Pfirrmann 2 were significantly older than patients who had only Pfirrmann 1 discs. The prevalence of disc bulging was 1 % [0-2.9]. No patients presented disc herniation (including protrusion or extrusions); additionally, no patients exhibited HIZ or Modic changes.

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental findings related to DD are very uncommon at this early age, in contrast to findings described in adults or later in adolescence.