Preoperative narcotic use and its relation to depression and anxiety in patients undergoing spine surgery

Mental health after lumbar spine surgery: cognitive appraisal processes and outcome in a longitudinal cohort study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

A not uncommon finding following spine surgery is that many patients do not achieve mental health improvement up to population norms for their age cohort, despite improvement in pain and functioning.

PURPOSE

This study examined how patients who were categorized as depressed versus not depressed think about health-related quality of life as assessed by cognitive-appraisal processes. It examined cross-sectional and longitudinal differences over 12 months postsurgery.

DESIGN

Prospective longitudinal cohort study with data collected at presurgery and at ∼3- and ∼12-months postsurgery from August 2013 to August 2023.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We included 173 adults undergoing lumbar spine surgery for degenerative spinal conditions at an academic medical center. The study sample was 47% female, with a mean age of 61 (SD=15.0), and a median level of education of college graduate.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Depression was defined as a Mental Component Score (MCS)≤38 on the Rand-36, building on studies that equated MCS scores with significant depression as assessed by clinically validated depression scales. The Quality-of-Life Appraisal Profile assessed the cognitive-appraisal domains of Experience Sampling and Standards of Comparison.

METHODS

The analysis focused on two comparisons: cross-sectionally comparing those who were not depressed (n=82) to those who were depressed (n=77) at baseline; and comparing longitudinal trajectories among those depressed before surgery and improved (n=54) versus did not improve (n=23). T-tests characterized group differences in appraisal endorsement; analysis of variance evaluated appraisal items in terms of explained variance; and Pearson correlation coefficients assessed direction of association in predicting mental health.

RESULTS

There were presurgical and longitudinal differences in both cognitive appraisal domains. Before surgery, depressed patients were less likely than nondepressed patients to endorse emphasizing the positive; more likely to focus on worst moments, recent flare-ups, their spinal condition, and the future; and more likely to compare themselves to high aspirations (eg, perfect health). Over time, among those who were depressed before surgery, those who improved focused decreasingly on worst moments and on the time before their spinal condition, and increasingly on emphasizing the positive and balancing the positives/negatives. Appraisal explained more variance in mental health among those who did not improve as compared to those who did, at all timepoints. All appraisal items were more highly correlated with mental health among those who remained depressed as compared to those who improved, particularly over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Endorsement of cognitive appraisal processes was different for depressed versus nondepressed spine-surgery patients before surgery and distinguished those who were depressed before surgery and improved versus those who did not improve. These findings suggest that targeted interventions could be beneficial for addressing mental health concerns during the spine surgery recovery trajectory. These interventions might use appraisal measures to identify patients likely to remain depressed after surgery, and then focus on helping these patients shift their focus and standards of comparison.

Effects of nurses-led multidisciplinary-based psychological management in spinal surgery: a retrospective, propensity-score-matching comparative study

BACKGROUND

Patients in spine surgery often have emotional disorders which is caused by multi-factors. Therefore, a multidisciplinary and multimodal intervention program is required to improve emotional disorders during the perioperative period. However, related studies were rare. This study aimed to confirm that the multidisciplinary-based psychological management leading by nurses was effective in treating emotional disorders and show the assignments of the members of the multidisciplinary team with the orientations of nurses.

DESIGN

A retrospective, comparative study.

METHOD

This study was a retrospective cohort research and compared the results between the intervention group and control group using the Huaxi Emotional Distress Index (HEI) which was used to evaluate emotional disorders. The intervention group consisted of patients who underwent surgery between January 2018 and December 2020 after psychological management was implemented. The control group consisted of patients with regular care who underwent surgery between January 2015 and December 2017. To improve comparability between the two groups, baseline data from the recruited patients were analyzed using propensity-score-matching (PSM) based on age, sex, marital status, education, and disease region.

RESULTS

A total of 539 (11.5%) people developed emotional disorders, of which 319 (6.8%), 151 (3.2%) and 69 (1.5%) had mild, moderate mood and severe emotional disorders, respectively. 2107 pairs of patients were matched after PSM. Scores of HEI in the intervention group were heightened compared with those in the control group (P<0.001) after matching. Moreover, the incidence of emotional disorders in patients decreased after implementing psychological management (P = 0.001). The severity of emotional disorders was alleviated with statistical significance as well (P = 0.010).

CONCLUSIONS

Nurses-led Multidisciplinary-Based psychological management was able to reduce the incidence of emotional disorders and improve the severity of these in spine surgery patients.

The Drivers of Persistent Opioid Use and Its Impact on Healthcare Utilization After Elective Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence of and risk factors for persistent opioid use after elective cervical and lumbar spine procedures and to quantify postoperative healthcare utilization in this patient population.

METHODS

Patients were retrospectively identified who underwent elective spine surgery for either cervical or lumbar degenerative pathology between November 1, 2013, and September 30, 2018, at a single academic center. Patients were split into 2 cohorts, including patients with and without opioid use at 180-days postoperatively. Baseline patient demographics, underlying comorbidities, surgical variables, and preoperative/postoperative opioid use were assessed. Health resource utilization metrics within 1 year postoperatively (ie, imaging studies, emergency and urgent care visits, hospital readmissions, opioid prescriptions, etc.) were compared between these 2 groups.

RESULTS

583 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 16.6% had opioid persistence after surgery. Opioid persistence was associated with ASA score ≥3 (P = .004), diabetes (P = .019), class I obesity (P = .012), and an opioid prescription in the 60 days prior to surgery (P = .006). Independent risk factors for opioid persistence assessed via multivariate regression included multi-level lumbar fusion (RR = 2.957), cervical central stenosis (RR = 2.761), and pre-operative opioid use (RR = 2.668). Opioid persistence was associated with higher rates of health care utilization, including more radiographs (P < .001), computed tomography (CT) scans (.007), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies (P = .014), emergency department (ED) visits (.009), pain medicine referrals (P < .001), and spinal injections (P = .003).

CONCLUSIONS

Opioid persistence is associated with higher rates of health care utilization within 1 year after elective spine surgery.

Does the Association Between Psychosocial Factors and Opioid Use After Elective Spine Surgery Differ by Sex in Older Adults?

Purpose

Psychosocial disorders have been linked to chronic postoperative opioid use and the development of postoperative pain. The potential interaction between sex and psychosocial factors with respect to opioid use after elective spine surgery in the elderly has not yet been evaluated. Our aim was to assess whether any observed association of anxiety or depression indicators with opioid consumption in the first 72 hours after elective spine surgery varies by sex in adults ≥65 years.

Patients and Methods

Secondary analysis of a retrospective cohort of 647 elective spine surgeries performed at Brigham and Women's Hospital, July 1, 2015-March 15, 2017, in patients ≥65. Linear mixed-effects models were used to test whether history of anxiety, anxiolytic use, history of depression, and antidepressant use were associated with opioid consumption 0-24, 24-48, and 48-72 post surgery, and whether these potential associations differed by sex.

Results

History of anxiety, anxiolytic use, history of depression, and antidepressant use were more common among women (51.3% of the sample). During the first 24 hours after surgery, men with a preoperative history of anxiety consumed an adjusted mean of 19.5 morphine milligram equivalents (MME) (99.6% CI: 8.1, 31.0) more than men without a history of anxiety; women with a history of anxiety only consumed an adjusted mean 2.9 MME (99.6% CI: -3.1, 8.9) more than women without a history of anxiety (P value for interaction between sex and history of anxiety <0.001). No other interactions were detected between sex and psychosocial factors with respect to opioid use after surgery.

Conclusion

Secondary analysis of this retrospective cohort study found minimal evidence that the association between psychosocial factors and opioid consumption after elective spine surgery differs by sex in adults ≥65.

The Effectiveness of a Mindfulness-Based Intervention Integrated with Physical Therapy (MIND-PT) for Postsurgical Rehabilitation After Lumbar Surgery: A Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial as Part of the Back Pain Consortium (BACPAC) Research Program

BACKGROUND

Improving pain management for persons with chronic low back pain (LBP) undergoing surgery is an important consideration in improving patient-centered outcomes and reducing the risk of persistent opioid use after surgery. Nonpharmacological treatments, including physical therapy and mindfulness, are beneficial for nonsurgical LBP through complementary biopsychosocial mechanisms, but their integration and application for persons undergoing surgery for LBP have not been examined. This study (MIND-PT) is a multisite randomized trial that compares an enriched pain management (EPM) pathway that integrates physical therapy and mindfulness vs usual-care pain management (UC) for persons undergoing surgery for LBP.

DESIGN

Participants from military treatment facilities will be enrolled before surgery and individually randomized to the EPM or UC pain management pathways. Participants assigned to EPM will receive presurgical biopsychosocial education and mindfulness instruction. After surgery, the EPM group will receive 10 sessions of physical therapy with integrated mindfulness techniques. Participants assigned to the UC group will receive usual pain management care after surgery. The primary outcome will be the pain impact, assessed with the Pain, Enjoyment, and General Activity (PEG) scale. Time to opioid discontinuation is the main secondary outcome.

SUMMARY

This trial is part of the National Institutes of Health Helping to End Addiction Long-term (HEAL) initiative, which is focused on providing scientific solutions to the opioid crisis. The MIND-PT study will examine an innovative program combining nonpharmacological treatments designed to improve outcomes and reduce opioid overreliance in persons undergoing lumbar surgery.

Impact of social determinants of health on perioperative opioid utilization in patients with lumbar degeneration

Background

Social determinants of health (SDOH), have been demonstrated to significantly impact health outcomes in spine patients. There may be interaction between opioid use and these factors in spine surgical patients. We aimed to evaluate the social determinants of health (SDOH) which are associated with perioperative opioid use among lumbar spine patients.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included patients undergoing spine surgery for lumbar degeneration in 2019. Opioid use was determined based on prescription records from the electronic medical records. Preoperative opioid users (OU) were compared with opioid-naïve patients regarding SDOH including demographics like age and race, and clinical data such as activity and tobacco use. Demographics and surgical data, including age, comorbidities, surgical invasiveness, and other variables were also collected from the records. Multivariate logistic regression was used for analysis of these factors.

Results

Ninety-eight patients were opioid-naïve and 90 used opioids preoperatively. All OU had ≥3 months of use, had more prior spine surgeries (1.07 vs. 0.44, p<.001) and more comorbidities including diabetes, hypertension, and depression (p=.021, 0.043, 0.017). Patients from lower community median income areas, unemployed, or with lower physical capacity (METS<5) were more likely to use opioids preoperatively. Postoperative opioid use was strongly associated with preoperative opioid use, as well as alcohol use, and lower community median income. At one year postoperatively, OU had higher rates of opioid use [72.2% vs. 15.3%, p<.001].

Conclusions

Unemployment, low physical activity level, and lower community median income were associated with preoperative opioid use and longer-term opioid use postoperatively.

Chronic Opioid Use Prior to ACDF Surgery Is Associated with Inferior Postoperative Outcomes: A Propensity-Matched Study of 17,443 Chronic Opioid Users

OBJECTIVE

Candidates for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) have a higher rate of opioid use than does the public, but studies on preoperative opioid use have not been conducted. We aimed to understand how preoperative opioid use affects post-ACDF outcomes.

METHODS

The MarketScan Database was queried from 2007 to 2015 to identify adult patients who underwent an ACDF. Patients were classified into separate cohorts based on the number of separate opioid prescriptions in the year before their ACDF. Ninety-day postoperative complications, postoperative readmission, reoperation, and total inpatient costs were compared between opioid strata. Propensity score-matched patient cohorts were calculated to balance comorbidities across groups.

RESULTS

Of 81,671 ACDF patients, 31,312 (38.3%) were nonusers, 30,302 (37.1%) were mild users, and 20,057 (24.6%) were chronic users. Chronic opioid users had a higher comorbidity burden, on average, than patients with less frequent opioid use (P < 0.001). Chronic opioid users had higher rates of postoperative complications (9.1%) than mild opioid users (6.0%) and nonusers (5.3%) (P < 0.001) and higher rates of readmission and reoperation. After balancing opioid nonusers versus chronic opioid users along with demographic characteristics, preoperative comorbidity, and operative characteristics, postoperative complications remained elevated for chronic opioid users relative to opioid nonusers (8.6% vs. 5.7%; P < 0.001), as did rates of readmission and reoperation.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic opioid users had more comorbidities than opioid nonusers and mild opioid users, longer hospitalizations, and higher rates of postoperative complication, readmission, and reoperation. After balancing patients across covariates, the outcome differences persisted, suggesting a durable association between preoperative opioid use and negative postoperative outcomes.

Association between spine injury and opioid misuse in a prospective cohort of Level I trauma patients

Objective

To explore patient and treatment factors explaining the association between spine injury and opioid misuse.

Design

Prospective cohort study.

Setting

Level I trauma center in a Midwestern city.

Participants

English speaking patients aged 18 to 75 on Trauma and Orthopedic Surgical Services receiving opioids during hospitalization and prescribed at discharge.

Exposure

Spine injury on the Abbreviated Injury Scale.

Main outcome measures

Opioid misuse was defined by using opioids: in a larger dose, more often, or longer than prescribed; via a non-prescribed route; from someone other than a prescriber; and/or use of heroin or opium. Exploratory factor groups included demographic, psychiatric, pain, and treatment factors. Multivariable logistic regression estimated the association between spine injury and opioid misuse when adjusting for each factor group.

Results

Two hundred eighty-five eligible participants consented of which 258 had baseline injury location data and 224 had follow up opioid misuse data. Most participants were male (67.8%), white (85.3%) and on average 43.1 years old. One-quarter had a spine injury (25.2%). Of those completing follow-up measures, 14 (6.3%) developed misuse. Treatment factors (injury severity, intubation, and hospital length of stay) were significantly associated with spine injury. Spine injury significantly predicted opioid misuse [odds ratio [OR] 3.20, 95% confidence interval [CI] (1.05, 9.78)]. In multivariable models, adjusting for treatment factors attenuated the association between spine injury and opioid misuse, primarily explained by length of stay.

Conclusion

Spine injury exhibits a complex association with opioid misuse that predominantly operates through treatment factors. Spine injury patients may represent a subpopulation requiring early intervention to prevent opioid misuse.

Preoperative opioid usage predicts markedly inferior outcomes 2 years after reverse total shoulder arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA) has proved to be a highly effective treatment for rotator cuff-deficient conditions and other end-stage shoulder pathologies. With value-based care emerging, identifying predictive factors of outcomes is of great interest. Although preoperative opioid use has been shown to predict inferior outcomes after anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty and rotator cuff repair, there is a paucity of data regarding its effect on outcomes after RTSA. We analyzed a series of RTSAs to determine the influence of preoperative opioid use on clinical and radiographic outcomes at a minimum of 2 years' follow-up.

METHODS

A retrospective review of primary RTSA patient data revealed 264 patients with ≥2 years of clinical and radiographic follow-up. Patients were classified as preoperative opioid users (71 patients) if they had taken narcotic pain medication for a minimum of 3 months prior to surgery or as opioid naive (193 patients) at the time of surgery. Assessments included preoperative and postoperative visual analog scale pain scores, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, strength, and range of motion, as well as complications and revisions. Radiographs were analyzed for signs of loosening or mechanical failure. The Mann-Whitney U and Fisher exact tests were used for comparisons between groups. Statistical significance was set at P < .05.

RESULTS

The mean patient age was 69.9 years, and the mean follow-up time was 2.8 years. Opioid users were significantly younger (66.1 years vs. 70.7 years, P < .001) at the time of surgery and had significantly higher preoperative rates of mood disorders, chronic pain disorders, and disability status (all P < .05). Postoperatively, opioid users had inferior visual analog scale pain scores (2.59 vs. 1.25, P < .001), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores (63.2 vs. 75.2, P < .001), active forward elevation (P < .001), and internal and external rotational shoulder strength (all P < .05) compared with opioid-naive patients. Periprosthetic radiolucency (8.45% vs. 2.07%, P = .026) and subsequent revision arthroplasty (14.1% vs. 4.66%, P = .014) occurred more frequently in opioid users than in opioid-naive patients. Both groups improved from baseline preoperatively to most recent follow-up in terms of functional outcomes and pain.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative opioid use portended markedly inferior clinical outcomes in patients undergoing RTSA. Additionally, opioid users had significantly increased rates of periprosthetic radiolucency and revision. Preoperative opioid use appears to be a significant marker for adverse outcomes after RTSA.

More Than 1 in 3 Patients With Chronic Low Back Pain Continue to Use Opioids Long-term After Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVE

A common expectation for patients after elective spine surgery is that the procedure will result in pain reduction and minimize the need for pain medication. Most studies report changes in pain and function after spine surgery, but few report the extent of opioid use after surgery. This systematic review aims to identify the rates of opioid use after lumbar spine fusion.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Ovid Medline were searched to identify studies published between January 1, 2005 and June 30, 2020 that assessed the effectiveness of lumbar fusion for the management of low back pain.

RESULTS

Of 6872 abstracts initially identified, 329 studies met the final inclusion criteria, and only 32 (9.7%) reported any postoperative opioid use. Long-term opioid use after surgery persists for more than 1 in 3 patients with usage ranging from 6 to 85.9% and a pooled mean of 35.0% based on data from 21 studies (6.4% of all lumbar fusion studies).

DISCUSSION

Overall, opioid use is not reported in the majority of lumbar fusion trials. Patients may expect a reduced need for opioid-based pain management after surgery, but the limited data available suggests long-term use is common. Lack of consistent reporting of these outcomes limits definitive conclusions regarding the efficacy of spinal fusion for reducing long-term opioid. Patient decisions about undergoing surgery may be altered if they had realistic expectations about rates of postsurgical opioid use. Spine surgery trials should track opioid utilization out to a minimum of 6 months after surgery as a core outcome.

Incidence and risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use following lumbar spine surgery: a cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Sustained postoperative opioid use after elective surgery is a matter of growing concern. Herein, the authors investigated incidence and predictors of long-term opioid use among patients undergoing elective lumbar spine surgery, especially as a function of opioid prescribing practices at postoperative discharge (dose in morphine milligram equivalents [MMEs] and type of opioid).

METHODS

The OptumLabs Data Warehouse (OLDW) was queried for postdischarge opioid prescriptions for patients undergoing elective lumbar decompression and discectomy (LDD) or posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) for degenerative spine disease. Only patients who received an opioid prescription at postoperative discharge and those who had a minimum of 180 days of insurance coverage prior to surgery and 180 days after surgery were included. Opioid-naive patients were defined as those who had no opioid fills in 180 days prior to surgery. The following patterns of long-term postoperative use were investigated: additional fills (at least one opioid fill 90-180 days after surgery), persistent fills (any span of opioid use starting in the 180 days after surgery and lasting at least 90 days), and Consortium to Study Opioid Risks and Trends (CONSORT) criteria for persistent use (episodes of opioid prescribing lasting longer than 90 days and 120 or more total days' supply or 10 or more prescriptions in 180 days after the index fill). Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of long-term use.

RESULTS

A total of 25,587 patients were included, of whom 52.7% underwent PLF (n = 13,486) and 32.5% (n = 8312) were opioid-naive prior to surgery. The rates of additional fills, persistent fills, and CONSORT use were 47%, 30%, and 23%, respectively, after PLF and 35.4%, 19%, and 14.2%, respectively, after LDD. The rates among opioid-naive patients were 18.9%, 5.6%, and 2.5% respectively, after PLF and 13.3%, 2.0%, and 0.8%, respectively, after LDD. Using multivariable logistic regression, the following were identified to be significantly associated with higher risk of long-term opioid use following PLF: discharge opioid prescription ≥ 500 MMEs, prescription of a long-acting opioid, female sex, multilevel surgery, and comorbidities such as depression and drug abuse (all p < 0.05). Elderly (age ≥ 65 years) and opioid-naive patients were found to be at lower risk (all p < 0.05). Similar results were obtained on analysis for LDD with the following significant additional risk factors identified: discharge opioid prescription ≥ 400 MMEs, prescription of tramadol alone at discharge, and inpatient surgery (all p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In an analysis of pharmacy claims from a national insurance database, the authors identified incidence and predictors of long-term opioid use after elective lumbar spine surgery.

Burden of preoperative opioid use and its impact on healthcare utilization after primary single level lumbar discectomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The complication profile and higher cost of care associated with preoperative opioid use and spinal fusion is well described. However, the burden of opioid use and its impact in patients undergoing lumbar discectomy is not known. Knowledge of this, especially for a relatively benign and predictable procedure will be important in bundled and value-based payment models.

PURPOSE

To study the burden of pre-operative opioid use and its effect on postoperative healthcare utilization, cost, and opioid use in patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A 29,745 patients undergoing primary single level lumbar discectomy from the IBM MarketScan (2000-2018) database.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Ninety-day and 1-year utilization of lumbar epidural steroid injections, emergency department (ED) services, lumbar magnetic resonance imaging, hospital readmission, and revision lumbar surgery. Continued opioid use beyond 3-months postoperatively until 1-year was also studied. We have reported costs associated with healthcare utilization among opioid groups.

METHODS

Patients were categorized in opioid use groups based on the duration and number of oral prescriptions before discectomy (opioid naïve, < 3-months opioid use, chronic preoperative use, chronic preoperative opioid use with 3-month gap before surgery, and other). The risk of association of preoperative opioid use with outcome measures was studied using multivariable logistic regression analysis with adjustment for various demographic and clinical variables.

RESULTS

A total of 29,745 patients with mean age of 45.3±9.6 years were studied. Pre-operatively, 29.0% were opioid naïve, 35.0% had < 3-months use and 12.0% were chronic opioid users. There was a significantly higher rate of post-operative lumbar epidural steroid injections, magnetic resonance imaging , ED visits, readmission and revision surgery within 90-days and 1-year after surgery in chronic pre-operative opioid users as compared with patients with < 3-months use and opioid naïve patients (p<.001). Chronic post-operative opioid use was present in 62.6% of the preoperative chronic opioid users as compared with 5.6% of patients with < 3-months opioid use. A 3-month prescription free period before surgery in chronic pre-operative opioid users cut the incidence of chronic post-operative opioid use by more than half, at 25.7%. Cost of care and adjusted analysis of risk have been described.

CONCLUSION

Chronic preoperative opioid use was present in 12% of a national cohort of lumbar discectomy patients. Such opioid use was associated with significantly higher post-operative healthcare utilization, risk of revision surgery, and costs at 90-days and 1-year postoperatively. Two-third of chronic preoperative opioid users had continued long-term postoperative opioid use. However, a 3-month prescription free period before surgery in chronic opioid users reduces the risk of long-term postoperative use. This data will be useful for patient education, pre-operative opioid use optimization, and risk-adjustment in value-based payment models.

The Impact of Nurse Navigator-Led Preoperative Education on Hospital Outcomes Following Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Beyond the spine-specific pathology, patient factors such as associated medical and psychosocial conditions, understanding of the treatment process, and the degree of patient activation-defined as the ability of the individual to utilize the available information and actively engage in making their healthcare decisions-can influence outcomes after posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) surgery. A retrospective observational cohort study of 177 patients undergoing PLF at a single institution was conducted. Patient demographics, medical and psychosocial risk factors, and outcomes were compared between patients who attended a nurse navigator-led group preoperative education course and those who did not. Patients attending the course were younger, more likely to undergo one-level fusion, less likely to undergo 5- or more-level fusion, and had less comorbidity burden as measured by the hierarchical condition categories score. No differences in psychosocial risk factors were observed between groups. Course attendees had a significantly shorter length of stay (2.12 vs. 2.60 days, p = .042) and decreased average hospital cost (U.S. $10,149 vs. U.S. $14,792, p < .001) than those who did not attend; no differences in other outcomes were observed. After controlling for differences in risk factors, patients enrolled in a preoperative education course demonstrated a statistically significant reduction in hospital cost (β=-4,143, p < .001). Preoperative education prior to PLF surgery may reduce hospital cost, possibly through increased patient activation. Given the relatively high prevalence of psychosocial risk factors in this and similar patient populations, optimizing patient activation and engagement is important to achieve high value care. Based on our findings, nurse navigator-led preoperative education appears to be valuable in this patient population and should be included in enhanced recovery protocols.

Association of Depression and Anxiety With Expectations and Satisfaction in Foot and Ankle Surgery

INTRODUCTION

Mental health diagnoses involving depression or anxiety are common and can have a dramatic effect on patients with musculoskeletal pathologies. In orthopaedics, depression/anxiety (D/A) is associated with worse postoperative patient-reported outcomes. However, few studies have assessed the effect of D/A on expectations and satisfaction in foot and ankle patients.

METHODS

Adult patients undergoing elective foot and ankle surgery were prospectively enrolled. Preoperatively, patients completed the eight-item Patient Health Questionnaire Depression Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder Screener-7, Foot and Ankle Outcome Score (FAOS), and Expectations Survey. At 2 years postoperatively, surveys including satisfaction, improvement, and fulfillment of expectations were administered. Fulfillment of expectations (fulfillment proportion) and FAOS scores were compared between patients with D/A and non-D/A patients.

RESULTS

Of 340 patients initially surveyed, 271 (80%) completed 2-year postoperative expectations surveys. One in five patients had D/A symptoms. Preoperatively, D/A patients had greater expectations of surgery (P = 0.015). After adjusting for measured confounders, the average 2-year postoperative fulfillment proportion was not significantly lower among D/A compared with non-D/A (0.86 versus 0.78, P = 0.2284). Although FAOS scores improved postoperatively for both groups, D/A patients had significantly lower preoperative and postoperative FAOS scores for domains of symptoms, activity, and quality of life (P < 0.05 for all). D/A patients reported less improvement (P = 0.036) and less satisfaction (P = 0.005) and were less likely willing to recommend surgery to others (P = 0.011).

DISCUSSION

Patients with D/A symptoms had higher preoperative expectations of surgery. Although D/A patients had statistically similar rates of fulfillment of expectations compared with non-D/A patients, they had markedly lower FAOS scores for domains of symptoms, activity, and quality of life. D/A patients also perceived less improvement and were more often dissatisfied with their outcomes. These findings should not dissuade providers from treating these patients surgically but rather emphasize the importance of careful patient selection and preoperative expectation management.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III; retrospective review of prospective cohort study.

The Influence of Preoperative Narcotic Consumption on Patient-Reported Outcomes of Lumbar Decompression

Study Design

Retrospective cohort.

Purpose

This study aimed to assess the relationship between preoperative narcotic consumption and patient-reported outcomes (PRO) in patients undergoing minimally invasive (MIS) lumbar decompression (LD).

Overview of Literature

Previous studies report negative effects of narcotic consumption on perioperative outcomes and recovery; however, its impact on quality of life and surgical outcomes is not fully understood.

Methods

A surgical database was retrospectively reviewed for patients undergoing primary, single-level MIS LD from 2013 to 2020. Patients lacking preoperative narcotic consumption data were excluded. Demographics, spinal pathologies, and operative characteristics were collected. Patients were grouped based on preoperative narcotic consumption. Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for back and leg, Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 12-item Short Form Physical Component Summary, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System physical function (PROMIS-PF) were collected preoperatively and postoperatively. Preestablished values were used to calculate achievement of minimum clinically important difference (MCID). Differences in mean PROs and MCID achievement between groups were evaluated.

Results

The cohort was 453 patients; 184 used preoperative narcotics and 269 did not. Significant differences were found in American Society of Anesthesiologists classification, ethnicity, insurance type, and estimated blood loss between groups. Significant differences were also found in preoperative PHQ-9, VAS leg, ODI, and PROMIS-PF between groups (all p<0.05). Mean postoperative PROs did not differ by group (p>0.05). A higher rate of MCID achievement was associated with the narcotic group for PHQ-9 and PROMIS-PF at 6 weeks (both p≤0.050), VAS leg at 1 year (p=0.009), and overall for ODI and PHQ-9 (both p≤0.050).

Conclusions

Preoperative narcotic consumption was associated with worse preoperative depression, leg pain, disability, and physical function. In patients consuming preoperative narcotics, a higher proportion achieved an overall MCID for disability and depressive symptoms. Patients taking preoperative narcotic medications may report significantly worse preoperative PROs but demonstrate greater improvements in postoperative disability and mental health.

Relationship between initial opioid prescription size and likelihood of refill after spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Best practices in opioid prescribing after elective surgery have been developed for most surgical subspecialties, including spine. However, some percentage of patients will become chronic users.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine the relationship between the size of initial opioid prescription after surgery for degenerative spinal disease and the likelihood of refills.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective case-control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Opioid-naïve patients aged 18 to 64 undergoing elective spinal procedures (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, posterior cervical fusion, lumbar decompression, and lumbar fusion) from 2010 to 2015 filling an initial perioperative prescription using insurance claims from Truven Health MarketScan (n=25,329).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Functional measure: health-care utilization. Primary outcome was occurrence of an opioid refill within 30 postoperative days.

METHODS

We used logistic regression to examine the probability of an additional refill by initial opioid prescription strength, adjusting for patient factors.

RESULTS

About 26.3% of opioid-naïve patients obtained refills of their opioid prescriptions within 30 days of surgery. The likelihood of obtaining a refill was unchanged with the size of the initial perioperative prescription across procedure categories. Patient factors associated with increased likelihood of refills included age 30 to 39 years (odds ratio [OR] 1.137, p=.007, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.072-1.249), female gender (OR 1.137, p<.001, 95% CI 1.072-1.207), anxiety disorder (OR 1.141, p=.017, 95% CI 1.024-1.272), mood disorder (OR 1.109 p=.049, 95% CI 1.000-1.229), and history of alcohol/substance abuse (OR 1.445 p=.006, 95% CI 1.110-1.880).

CONCLUSIONS

For opioid-naïve patients, surgeons can prescribe lower amounts of opioids after elective surgery for degenerative spinal disease without concern of increased need for refills.

Development and validation of a clinical prediction score for poor postoperative pain control following elective spine surgery

OBJECTIVE

Thirty percent to sixty-four percent of patients experience poorly controlled pain following spine surgery, leading to patient dissatisfaction and poor outcomes. Identification of at-risk patients before surgery could facilitate patient education and personalized clinical care pathways to improve postoperative pain management. Accordingly, the aim of this study was to develop and internally validate a prediction score for poorly controlled postoperative pain in patients undergoing elective spine surgery.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was performed in adult patients (≥ 18 years old) consecutively enrolled in the Canadian Spine Outcomes and Research Network registry. All patients underwent elective cervical or thoracolumbar spine surgery and were admitted to the hospital. Poorly controlled postoperative pain was defined as a mean numeric rating scale score for pain at rest of > 4 during the first 24 hours after surgery. Univariable analysis followed by multivariable logistic regression on 25 candidate variables, selected through a systematic review and expert consensus, was used to develop a prediction model using a random 70% sample of the data. The model was transformed into an eight-tier risk-based score that was further simplified into the three-tier Calgary Postoperative Pain After Spine Surgery (CAPPS) score to maximize clinical utility. The CAPPS score was validated using the remaining 30% of the data.

RESULTS

Overall, 57% of 1300 spine surgery patients experienced poorly controlled pain during the first 24 hours after surgery. Seven significant variables associated with poor pain control were incorporated into a prediction model: younger age, female sex, preoperative daily use of opioid medication, higher preoperative neck or back pain intensity, higher Patient Health Questionnaire-9 depression score, surgery involving ≥ 3 motion segments, and fusion surgery. Notably, minimally invasive surgery, body mass index, and revision surgery were not associated with poorly controlled pain. The model was discriminative (C-statistic 0.74, 95% CI 0.71-0.77) and calibrated (Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit, p = 0.99) at predicting the outcome. Low-, high-, and extreme-risk groups stratified using the CAPPS score had 32%, 63%, and 85% predicted probability of experiencing poorly controlled pain, respectively, which was mirrored closely by the observed incidence of 37%, 62%, and 81% in the validation cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Inadequate pain control is common after spine surgery. The internally validated CAPPS score based on 7 easily acquired variables accurately predicted the probability of experiencing poorly controlled pain after spine surgery.

Multi-modal pain control regimen for anterior lumbar fusion drastically reduces in-hospital opioid consumption

Background

The opioid epidemic is at epic proportions currently in the United States. Exposure to opioids for surgery and subsequent postoperative pain management is a known risk factor for opioid dependence. In addition, opioids can have a negative impact on multiple aspects including clinical outcomes, length of hospital stay, and overall cost of care. Thus, the greatest effort to reduce perioperative opioid use is necessary and a multimodal pain control (MMPC) has been gaining popularity. However, its efficacy in spine surgery is not well known. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy of a MMPC protocol in patients undergoing lumbar single-level anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF).

Methods

This is a retrospective comparative study. From a prospective, single-surgeon, surgical database, consecutive patients undergoing single-level ALIF with or without subsequent posterior fusion for degenerative lumbar conditions were identified before and after initiation of the MMPC protocol. The MMPC protocol consisted of a preoperative oral regimen of cyclobenzaprine (10 mg), gabapentin (600 mg), acetaminophen (1 g), and methadone (10 mg). Postoperatively they received a bilateral transverse abdominis plane block with 0.5% Ropivacaine prior to extubation. We compared in-hospital opioid consumption between the MMPC and non-MMPC cohorts as well as baseline demographic, the length of hospital stay, cost, and rate of postoperative ileus. Opioid consumption was calculated and normalized to the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs).

Results

In total, 68 patients in the MMPC cohort and 39 in the non-MMPC cohort were identified. There was no difference in baseline demographics including sex, body mass index, smoking status, or preoperative opioid use between the two groups. Although there was no difference in the MMEs on the day of surgery (58.5 vs. 66.9, P=0.387), cumulative MMEs each day after surgery was significantly lower in the MMPC cohort, with final cumulative MMEs being reduced by 62% (120.2 vs. 314.8, P<0.001). There was no difference in postoperative ileus, length of stay, and hospital costs.

Conclusions

The use of a MMPC protocol in patients undergoing single-level ALIF for degenerative conditions reduced opioid consumption starting on the first day after surgery, resulting in a cumulative reduction of 62%.

Correlating Psychological Comorbidities and Outcomes After Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Literature review.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this literature review is to examine the effects of psychological disorders on postoperative complications, surgical outcomes, and long-term narcotic use. We also hope to detail the value of preoperative identification and treatment of these pathologies.

METHODS

A series of systematic reviews of the relevant literature examining the effects of psychological disorders and spine surgery was conducted using PubMed and Cochrane databases.

RESULTS

Combined, the database queries yielded 2275 articles for consideration. After applying screening criteria, 96 articles were selected for inclusion. Patients with underlying psychological disease have higher rates of delirium, readmission, longer hospital stays, and higher rates of nonroutine discharge following spine surgery. They also have higher rates of chronic postoperative narcotic use and may experience worse surgical outcomes. Because of these defined issues, researchers have developed multiple screening tools to help identify patients with psychological disorders preoperatively for potential treatment. Treatment of these disorders prior to surgery may significantly improve surgical outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Patients with psychological disorders represent a unique population with respect to their higher rates of spinal pain complaints, postoperative complications, and worsened functional outcomes. However, proper identification and treatment of these conditions prior to surgery may significantly improve many outcome measures in this population. Future investigations in this field should attempt to develop and validate current strategies to identify and treat individuals with psychological disorders before surgery to further improve outcomes.

Expectations of Lumbar Surgery Outcomes among Opioid Users Compared with Non-Users

STUDY DESIGN

Matched cohort study.

PURPOSE

To compare and describe the effect of opioid usage on the expectations of lumbar surgery outcomes among patients taking opioids and patients not taking opioids.

OVERVIEW OF LITERATURE

Chronic opioid use is common among lumbar-spine surgery patients. The decision to undergo elective lumbar surgery is influenced by the expected surgery outcomes. However, the effects of opioids on patients' expectations of lumbar surgery outcomes remain to be rigorously assessed.

METHODS

A total of 77 opioid users grouped according to dose and duration (54 "higher users," 30 "lower users") were matched 2:1 to 154 non-opioid users based on age, sex, marital status, chiropractic care, disability, and diagnosis. All patients completed a validated 20-item Expectations Survey measuring expected improvement with regard to symptoms, function, psychological well-being, and anticipated future spine condition. "Greater expectations" was defined as a higher survey score (possible range, 0-100) based on the number of items expected and degree of improvement expected.

RESULTS

The mean Expectations Survey scores for all opioid users and all non-users were similar (73 vs. 70, p=0.18). Scores were different, however, for lower users (79) compared with matched non-users (69, p=0.01) and compared with higher users (70, p=0.01). In multivariable analysis, "reater expectations" was independently associated with having had chiropractic care (p=0.03), being more disabled (p=0.002), and being a lower-dose opioid user (p=0.03). Compared with higher users, lower users were also more likely to expect not to need pain medications 2 years after surgery (47% vs. 83%, p=0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Patient expectations of lumbar surgery are associated with diverse demographic and clinical variables. A lower dose and shorter duration of opioid use were associated with expecting more items and expecting more complete improvement compared with non-users. In addition, lower opioid users had greater overall expectations compared with higher users.

Preoperative Opioid Use and Clinical Outcomes in Spine Surgery: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Prescription opioid use and opioid-related deaths have become an epidemic in the United States, leading to devastating economic and health ramifications. Opioids are the most commonly prescribed drug class to treat low back pain, despite the limited body of evidence supporting their efficacy. Furthermore, preoperative opioid use prior to spine surgery has been reported to range from 20% to over 70%, with nearly 20% of this population being opioid dependent.

OBJECTIVE

To review the medical literature on the effect of preoperative opioid use in outcomes in spine surgery.

METHODS

We reviewed manuscripts published prior to February 1, 2019, exploring the effect of preoperative opioid use on outcomes in spine surgery. We identified 45 articles that analyzed independently the effect of preoperative opioid use on outcomes (n = 32 lumbar surgery, n = 19 cervical surgery, n = 7 spinal deformity, n = 5 “other”).

RESULTS

Preoperative opioid use is overwhelmingly associated with negative surgical and functional outcomes, including postoperative opioid use, hospitalization duration, healthcare costs, risk of surgical revision, and several other negative outcomes.

CONCLUSION

There is an urgent and unmet need to find and apply extensive perioperative solutions to combat opioid use, particularly in patients undergoing spine surgery. Further investigations are necessary to determine the optimal method to treat such patients and to develop opioid-combative strategies in patients undergoing spine surgery.

The Impact of Preoperative Chronic Opioid Therapy in Patients Undergoing Decompression Laminectomy of the Lumbar Spine

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review of electronic medical records (EMR).

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to (1) characterize the pattern of opioid utilization in patients undergoing spine surgery and (2) compare the postoperative course between patients with and without chronic preoperative opioid prescriptions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative pain management for patients with a history of opioid usage remains a challenge for spine surgeons. Opioids are controversial in this setting due to side effects and potential for abuse and addiction. Given the increasing rate of opioid prescriptions for spine-related pain, more studies are needed to evaluate patterns and risks of preoperative opioid usage in surgical patients.

METHODS

EMR were reviewed for patients (age > 18) with lumbar spinal stenosis undergoing lumbar laminectomy in 2011 at our institution. Data regarding patient demographics, levels operated, pre/postoperative medications, and in-hospital length of stay were collected. Primary outcomes were length of stay and duration of postoperative opioid usage.

RESULTS

One hundred patients were reviewed. Fifty-five patients had a chronic opioid prescription documented at least 3 months before surgery. Forty-five patients were not on chronic opioid therapy preoperatively. The preoperative opioid group compared with the non-opioid group had a greater proportion of females (53% vs. 40%), younger mean age (63 yrs vs. 65 yrs), higher frequency of preoperative benzodiazepine prescription (20% vs. 11%), longer average in-hospital length of stay (3.7 d vs. 3.2 d), and longer duration on postoperative opioids (211 d vs. 79 d).

CONCLUSION

Patients on chronic opioids prior to spine surgery are more likely to have a longer hospital stay and continue on opioids for a longer time after surgery, compared with patients not on chronic opioid therapy. Spine surgeons and pain specialists should seek to identify patients on chronic opioids before surgery and evaluate strategies to optimize pain management in the pre- and postoperative course.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Characterizing the Risk of Long-Term Opioid Utilization in Patients Undergoing Lumbar Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Single-institution retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether prescribing practices at discharge are associated with opioid dependence (OD) in patients undergoing discectomy or laminectomy procedures for degenerative indications.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Long-term opioid use in spine surgery is associated with higher healthcare utilization and worse postoperative outcomes. The impact of prescribing practices at discharge within this surgical population is poorly understood.

METHODS

A query of an administrative database was conducted to identify all patients undergoing discectomy or laminectomy procedures at our high-volume tertiary referral center between 2007 and 2016. For patients included in the analysis, opioid prescription data on admission and discharge were manually abstracted from the electronic health record, including opioid type, frequency, route, and dose, and then converted to daily morphine equivalent dose (MED) values. We defined OD as a consecutive narcotic prescription lasting for at least 90 days within the first 12 months after the index surgical procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 819 total patients, 499 (60.9%) patients had an active opioid prescription before surgery. Postoperatively, 813 (99.3%) received at least one narcotic prescription within 30 days of index surgery, and 162 (19.8%) continued with sustained opioid use in the 12 months after surgery. In adjusted analysis, patients with OD had a higher incidence of preoperative depression (P = 0.012) and preoperative opioid use (P < 0.001), as well as a higher frequency of preoperative benzodiazepine prescriptions (P = 0.009), and discharge MED value exceeding 120 mg/day (P = 0.013). Postoperative OD was observed in 7.5% of previously opioid-naïve patients.

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to test for an association between MED values prescribed at discharge and sustained opioid use after lumbar spine surgery. In addition to previously reported risk factors, discharge prescription dose exceeding 120 mg/day is independently associated with OD after spine surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Preoperative Maximization to Reduce Complications in Spinal Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Invited narrative review.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review was to summarize current literature regarding risk factors that surgeons can optimize in the preoperative setting in the spinal surgery patient, in order to reduce complications and improve patient-reported outcomes.

METHODS

Review of the relevant literature by the authors.

RESULTS

Modifiable risk factors identified relative to the patient include obesity, malnutrition/nutrient deficiency, diabetes/hyperglycemia, preoperative anemia, vitamin D/DEXA (dual-energy radiograph absorptiometry), nicotine use/smoking, and opioid use/psychosocial factors.

CONCLUSION

By maximizing a patient's physiological and psychological status prior to elective spine surgery, we may move closer to achieving the goals of value-based care: improving patient-reported outcomes while decreasing the cost of care.

Postoperative opioid cessation rates based on preoperative opioid use

Aims

The aim of this study was to characterize the relationship between pre- and postoperative opioid use among patients undergoing common elective orthopaedic procedures

Patients and Methods

Pre- and postoperative opioid use were studied among patients from a national insurance database undergoing seven common orthopaedic procedures using univariate log-rank tests and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analyses.

Results

A total of 98 769 patients were included; 35 701 patients were opioid-naïve, 11 621 used opioids continuously for six months before surgery, and 4558 used opioids continuously for at least six months but did not obtain any prescriptions in the three months before surgery. Among opioid-naïve patients, between 0.76% and 4.53% used opioids chronically postoperatively. Among chronic preoperative users, between 42% and 62% ceased chronic opioids postoperatively. A three-month opioid-free period preoperatively led to a rate of cessation of chronic opioid use between 82% and 93%, as compared with between 31% and 50% with continuous preoperative use (p < 0.001 for significant changes in opioid use before and after surgery in each procedure). Between 5.6 and 20.0 preoperative chronic users ceased chronic use for every new chronic opioid user. Risk factors for chronic postoperative use included chronic preoperative opioid use (odds ratio (OR) 4.84 to 39.75; p < 0.0001) and depression (OR 1.14 to 1.55; p < 0.05 except total hip arthroplasty). With a three-month opioid-free period before surgery, chronic preoperative opioids elevated the risk of chronic opioid use only mildly, if at all (OR 0.47 to 1.75; p < 0.05 for total shoulder arthroplasty, rotator cuff repair, and carpal tunnel release).

Conclusion

Chronic preoperative opioid use increases the risk of chronic postoperative use, but an opioid-free period before surgery decreases this risk compared with continuous preoperative use Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2019;101-B:1570–1577

Total Inpatient Morphine Milligram Equivalents Can Predict Long-term Opioid Use After Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study from a single institution.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to assess the thresholds for postoperative opioid consumption, which are predictive of continued long-term opioid dependence.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The specific sum total of inpatient opioid consumption as a risk factor for long-term use after transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) has not been previously studied.

METHODS

Charts of patients who underwent a one, two, or three-level primary TLIF between 2014 and 2017 were reviewed. Total morphine milligram equivalents (MME) consumed was tabulated and separated into three categories based on ROC curve analysis of opioid utilization at 6-month follow-up. Multivariate binary regression analysis assessed these MME dosage categories. A further subanalysis grouped patients on the basis of whether they had used opioids preoperatively.

RESULTS

One hundred seventy-two patients met the inclusion criteria and were separated into groups who received less than 250 total inpatient MME (44%), between 250 and 500 total inpatient MME (26%), and greater than 500 total inpatient MME (27%). Patients undergoing a TLIF who received <250 total MME in the immediate postoperative period had a 3.73 (odds ratio) times smaller probability of requiring opioids at 6-month follow-up [P = 0.027, 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.084-0.86]. Patients who received >500 total MME had a 4.84 times greater probability (P = 0.002, 95% CI 1.8-13) of requiring opioids at 6-month follow-up. A subanalysis demonstrated individuals with preoperative opioid use who received <250 total MME had a 7.09 times smaller probability (P = 0.033, 95% CI 0.023-0.85) of requiring opioids at 6-month follow-up while those who received >500 total MME had a 5.43 times greater probability (P = 0.033, 95% CI 1.6-18) of requiring opioids at 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSION

Exceeding the threshold of 500 total MMEs in the immediate postoperative period after a TLIF is a significant risk factor that predicts continued opioid use at 6-month follow-up, particularly among patients with a history of preoperative opioid utilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Preoperative Chronic Opioid Therapy Negatively Impacts Long-term Outcomes Following Cervical Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, observational.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to define the impact of preoperative chronic opioid therapy (COT) on outcomes following cervical spine fusions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Opioid therapy is a commonly practiced method to control acute postoperative pain. However, concerns exist relating to use of prescription opioids, including inherent risk of abuse, tolerance, and inferior outcomes following major surgery.

METHODS

A commercial dataset was queried from 2007 to 2015 for patients undergoing primary cervical spine arthrodesis [ICD-9 codes 81.01-81.03]. Primary outcome measures were 1-year and 2-year reoperation rates, emergency department (ED) visits, adverse events, and prolonged postoperative opioid use. Secondary outcomes included short-term outcomes including 90-day complications (cardiac, renal, neurologic, infectious, etc.). COT was defined as a history of opioid prescription filling within 3 months before surgery and was the primary exposure variable of interest. Generalized linear models investigated the association of preoperative COT on primary/secondary endpoints following risk-adjustment.

RESULTS

Overall, 20,730 patients (51.3% female; 85.9% >50 years) underwent primary cervical spine arthrodesis. Of these, 10,539 (n = 50.8%) met criteria for COT. Postoperatively, 75.3% and 29.8% remained on opioids at 3 months and 1 year. Multivariable models identified an association between COT and an increased risk of 90-day ED visit [odds ratio (OR): 1.25; P < 0.001] and wound complications (OR: 1.24; P = 0.036). At 1 year, COT was strongly associated with reoperations (OR: 1.17; P = 0.043), ED visits (OR: 1.31; P < 0.001), and adverse events including wound complications (OR: 1.32; P < 0.001), infections (OR: 1.34; P = 0.042), constipation (OR: 1.11; P = 0.032), neurological complications (OR: 1.44; P = 0.01), acute renal failure (OR: 1.24; P = 0.004), and venous thromboembolism (OR: 1.20; P = 0.008). At 2 years, COT remained a significant risk factor for additional long-term negative outcomes such as reoperations, including adjacent segment disc disease (OR: 1.21; P = 0.005), ED visits (OR: 1.32; P < 0.001), and other adverse events. Preoperative COT was associated with prolonged postoperative narcotic use at 3 months (OR: 1.30; P < 0.001), 1 year (OR: 5.17; P < 0.001), and at 2 years (OR: 5.75; P < 0.001) after cervical arthrodesis.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative COT is a modifiable risk factor that is strongly associated with prolonged postoperative opioid use. In addition, COT was associated with inferior short-term and long-term outcomes after cervical spine fusion.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Discontinuation of Chronic Opiate Therapy After Successful Spinal Cord Stimulation Is Highly Dependent Upon the Daily Opioid Dose

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to determine if any of the factors recorded on a standard clinical history of a patient considered for spinal cord stimulation (SCS) would be associated with reduction or cessation of opioids following implantation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single academic center.

METHODS

Patients included in the chart analysis underwent implantation of percutaneous SCS devices from 1999 to 2015 with follow-up until the end of September 2018. Patients who achieved at least an average of 50% pain reduction were included for analysis of daily opioid intake. Patients were then divided into 4 groups that included no opioid use, stable opioid daily dose, weaned opioid dose, and complete cessation of opioids. Statistical methods were used to analyze for associations between opioid intake after SCS insertion and usual elements of a clinical history, including adjuvant medications, numeric pain rating, past medical history, psychiatric illness, substance abuse, employment, and smoking history.

RESULTS

In a group of 261 patients who had undergone implantation, 214 met the criteria for analysis and had a median age of 50 years, with majority having the diagnoses of failed back surgery syndrome and complex regional pain syndrome. The only factor that was associated with complete cessation of opioid use was a median dose of 30 mg of morphine per day (P < 0.01) and was observed in 15% of subjects who used opioids preoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The elimination of opioid dependence following initiation of SCS therapy is highly dependent on the daily dose.

Incidence and Risk Factors for Chronic Postoperative Opioid Use After Major Spine Surgery: A Cross-Sectional Study With Longitudinal Outcome

BACKGROUND

Chronic opioid use is a significant public health concern. Surgery is a risk factor for developing chronic opioid use. Patients undergoing major spine surgery frequently are prescribed opioids preoperatively and may be at risk for chronic opioid use postoperatively. The aim of this study was to investigate the incidence of and perioperative risk factors associated with chronic opioid use after major spine surgery.

METHODS

The records of patients who underwent elective major spine surgery at the University of Virginia between March 2011 and February 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. The primary outcome was chronic opioid use through 12 months postoperatively. Demographic data, medical comorbidities, preoperative pain scores, and medication use including daily morphine-equivalent (ME) dose, intraoperative use of lidocaine and ketamine, estimated blood loss, postoperative pain scores and medication use, and postoperative opioid use were collected. Logistic regression models were used to examine factors associated with chronic opioid use.

RESULTS

Of 1477 patient records reviewed, 412 patients (27.9%) were opioid naive and 1065 patients (72.3%) used opioids before surgery. Opioid data were available for 1325 patients, while 152 patients were lost to 12-month follow-up and were excluded. Of 958 preoperative opioid users, 498 (52.0%) remained chronic users through 12 months. There was a decrease in opioid dosage (mg ME) from preoperative to 12 months postoperatively with a mean difference of -14.7 mg ME (standard deviation, 1.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], -17.8 to -11.7). Among 367 previously opioid-naive patients, 67 (18.3%) became chronic opioid users. Factors associated with chronic opioid use were examined using logistic regression models. Preoperative opioid users were nearly 4 times more likely to be chronic opioid users through 12 months than were opioid-naive patients (odds ratio, 3.95; 95% CI, 2.51-6.33; P < .001). Mean postoperative pain score (0-10) was associated with increased odds of chronic opioid use (odds ratio for a 1 unit increase in pain score 1.25, 95% CI, 1.13-1.38; P < .001). Use of intravenous ketamine or lidocaine was not associated with chronic opioid use through 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Greater than 70% of patients presenting for major spine surgery used opioids preoperatively. Preoperative opioid use and higher postoperative pain scores were associated with chronic opioid use through 12 months. Use of ketamine and lidocaine did not decrease the risk for chronic opioid use. Surveillance of patients for these factors may identify those at highest risk for chronic opioid use and target them for intervention and reduction strategies.

Comparing different chronic preoperative opioid use definitions on outcomes after spine surgery

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

No consensus exists for defining chronic preoperative opioid use. Most spine studies rely solely on opioid duration to stratify patients into preoperative risk categories.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare established opioid definitions that contain both duration and dosage to opioid models that rely solely on duration, including the CDC Guideline for Prescribing Opioids for Chronic Pain, in patients undergoing spine surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study that used opioid data from the Tennessee Controlled Substance Monitoring Database and prospective clinical data from a single-center academic spine registry.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The study cohort consisted of 2,373 patients who underwent elective spine surgery for degenerative conditions between January 2011 and February 2017 and who completed a follow-up assessment at 12 months after surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative opioid use and patient-reported satisfaction (NASS Satisfaction Scale), disability (Oswestry/Neck Disability Index), and pain (Numeric Rating Scale) at 12 month follow-up.

METHODS

Six different chronic preoperative opioid use variables were created based on the number of times a prescription was filled and/or daily morphine milligram equivalent for the one year before surgery. These variables defined chronic opioid use as 1) most days for > 3 months (CDC), 2) continuous use for ≥ 6 months (Schoenfeld), 3) >4,500 mg for at least 9 months (Svendsen wide), 4) >9,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen intermediary), 5) >18,000 mg for 12 months (Svendsen strict), 6) low-dose chronic (1-36 mg for >91 days), medium-dose chronic (36-120 mg for >91 days), and high-dose chronic (>120 mg for >91 days) (Edlund). Multivariable regression models yielding C-index and R² values were used to compare chronic preoperative opioid use definitions by postoperative outcomes, adjusting for type of surgery.

RESULTS

Chronic preoperative opioid use was reported in 470 to 725 (19.8% to 30.6%) patients, depending on definition. The Edlund definition, accounting for duration and dosage, had the highest predictive ability for postoperative opioid use (77.5%), followed by Schoenfeld (75.7%), CDC (72.6%), and Svendsen (59.9% to 72.5%) definitions. A combined Edlund and Schoenfeld duration and dosage definition in post-hoc analysis, that included 3 and 6 month duration cut-offs, performed the best overall with a C-index of 78.4%. Both Edlund and Schoenfeld definitions explained similar amounts of variance in satisfaction, disability, and pain (4.2% to 8.5%). Svendsen and CDC definitions demonstrated poorer performance for patient-reported outcomes (1.4% to 7.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The Edlund definition is recommended for identifying patients at highest risk for postoperative opioid use. When opioid dosage is unavailable, the Schoenfeld definition is a reasonable choice with similar predictive ability. For patient-reported outcomes, either the Edlund or Schoenfeld definition is recommended. Future work should consider combing dosage and duration, with 3 and 6 month cutoffs, into chronic opioid use definitions.

Preoperative Narcotic Use and Inferior Outcomes After Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty: A Clinical and Radiographic Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Our purpose was to determine whether the chronic use of preoperative narcotics adversely affected clinical and/or radiographic outcomes.

METHODS

Seventy-three patients (79 shoulders) with primary total shoulder arthroplasty for osteoarthritis were evaluated clinically and radiographically at preoperative visits and postoperatively at a minimum follow-up of 2 years: 26 patients (28 shoulders) taking chronic narcotic pain medication for at least 3 months before surgery and 47 patients (51 shoulders) who were not taking narcotics preoperatively.

RESULTS

Postoperatively, significant differences were noted between the narcotic and nonnarcotic groups regarding American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores and visual analog scale scores, as well as forward elevation, external rotation, and all strength measurements (P < 0.01). The nonnarcotic group had markedly higher American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons scores, better overall range of motion and strength, and markedly lower visual analog scale scores than the narcotic group.

CONCLUSION

Chronic preoperative narcotic use seems to be a notable indicator of poor outcomes of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty for glenohumeral osteoarthritis.

The Presence of a Psychiatric Condition is Associated With Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Matched Case-Controlled Study

BACKGROUND

We sought to examine the association between having a psychiatric condition and undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement (FAI).

METHODS

A matched case-control study was performed to control for age and gender. All patients over 16 years of age with FAI treated with hip arthroscopy by a single surgeon were randomly matched to a patient of the same age and gender undergoing knee arthroscopy for any diagnosis other than infection by the same surgeon during the same period. Conditional logistic regression was used to compare the odds of having a psychiatric condition between groups.

RESULTS

Fifty-one matched pairs of patients undergoing hip and knee arthroscopy were identified. Each group contained 35 females (69%) and had a mean age of 33.6 years. Of the 51 hip arthroscopy cases, 23 (45.1%) had a psychiatric condition. Of the 51 knee arthroscopy controls, 11 (21.6%) had a psychiatric condition. Patients undergoing hip arthroscopy were statistically significantly more likely to have a psychiatric condition compared to patients undergoing knee arthroscopy with an odds ratio of 3.4 (95% confidence interval 1.3-9.2, P < .01).

CONCLUSION

There was a strong association between having a psychiatric condition and undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAI. More research should be done investigating psychiatric conditions among patients with FAI and whether this association can identify strategies to optimize patient outcomes.

Use of prescription opioids before and after an operation for chronic pain (lumbar fusion surgery)

Lumbar fusion surgery is usually prompted by chronic back pain, and many patients receive long-term preoperative opioid analgesics. Many expect surgery to eliminate the need for opioids. We sought to determine what fraction of long-term preoperative opioid users discontinue or reduce dosage postoperatively; what fraction of patients with little preoperative use initiate long-term use; and what predicts long-term postoperative use. This retrospective cohort study included 2491 adults undergoing lumbar fusion surgery for degenerative conditions, using Oregon's prescription drug monitoring program to quantify opioid use before and after hospitalization. We defined long-term postoperative use as ≥4 prescriptions filled in the 7 months after hospitalization, with at least 3 occurring >30 days after hospitalization. Overall, 1045 patients received long-term opioids preoperatively, and 1094 postoperatively. Among long-term preoperative users, 77.1% continued long-term postoperative use, and 13.8% had episodic use. Only 9.1% discontinued or had short-term postoperative use. Among preoperative users, 34.4% received a lower dose postoperatively, but 44.8% received a higher long-term dose. Among patients with no preoperative opioids, 12.8% became long-term users. In multivariable models, the strongest predictor of long-term postoperative use was cumulative preoperative opioid dose (odds ratio of 15.47 [95% confidence interval 8.53-28.06] in the highest quartile). Cumulative dose and number of opioid prescribers in the 30-day postoperative period were also associated with long-term use. Thus, lumbar fusion surgery infrequently eliminated long-term opioid use. Opioid-naive patients had a substantial risk of initiating long-term use. Patients should have realistic expectations regarding opioid use after lumbar fusion surgery.

Prescription Opioid Use Before and After Hip Arthroscopy: A Caution to Prescribers

PURPOSE

To determine pre- and postoperative opioid utilization while identifying risk factors for prolonged postoperative opioid use following hip arthroscopy.

METHODS

All patients undergoing hip arthroscopy between 2007 and the second quarter of 2016 were identified within the Humana Inc. administrative claims database. Chronic preoperative opioid utilization was defined as filling of any opioid prescription 1 to 3 months before surgery, whereas acute preoperative opioid utilization was defined as filling any opioid prescription within 1 month of surgery. Rates of pre- and postoperative opioid utilization were calculated, and patient demographic characteristics and medical conditions associated with pre- and postoperative opioid utilization were identified.

RESULTS

Of the 1,208 patients undergoing hip arthroscopy, chronic and acute preoperative opioid utilization was observed in 24.9% and 17.3% of patients, respectively. Chronic preoperative opioid utilization was more frequently observed in obese (P < .001) patients, those ≥50 years of age (P = .002), and those with preexisting anxiety and/or depression (P < .001). In multivariate analysis, chronic preoperative opioid utilization was the strongest predictor of opioid prescription filling at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months postoperatively (odds ratio at 3 months, 18.60, 95% confidence interval, 12.41 to 28.55), whereas preexisting anxiety and/or depression and obesity were additionally identified as predictors of prolonged postoperative opioid utilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic preoperative opioid utilization before hip arthroscopy is common at 24.9%. The high rate of chronic preoperative opioid utilization is particularly important considering that chronic preoperative opioid utilization is the strongest predictor of continued postoperative opioid prescription filling out to 12 months postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, retrospective case series.

Chronic preoperative opioid use is a risk factor for increased complications, resource use, and costs after cervical fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

As health-care transitions to value-based models, there has been an increased focus on patient factors that can influence peri- and postoperative adverse events, resource use, and costs. Many studies have reported risk factors for systemic complications after cervical fusion, but none have studied chronic opioid therapy (COT) as a risk factor.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to answer the following questions from a large cohort of patients who underwent primary cervical fusion for degenerative pathology: (1) What is the patient profile associated with preoperative COT? (2) Is preoperative COT a risk factor for 90-day systemic complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmission, and 1-year adverse events? (3) What are the risk factors and 1-year adverse events related to long-term postoperative opioid use? (4) How much did payers reimburse for management of complications and adverse events?

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective review of Humana commercial insurance data (2007-Q3 2015).

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample included 29,101 patients undergoing primary cervical fusion for degenerative pathology.

METHODS

Patients and procedures of interest were included using International Classification of Diseases (ICD) coding. Patients with opioid prescriptions for >6 months before surgery were considered as having preoperative COT. Patients with continued opioid use until 1-year after surgery were considered as long-term users. Descriptive analysis of patient cohorts has been done. Multiple-variable logistic regression analyses adjusting for approach, number of levels of surgery, discharge disposition, and comorbidities were done to answer first three study questions. Reimbursement data from insurers have been reported to answer our fourth study question.

RESULTS

Of the entire cohort, 6,643 (22.8%) had preoperative COT. Preoperative COT was associated with a higher risk of 90-day wound complications (odds ratio [OR] 1.39, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.16-1.66), all-cause 90-day ED visits (adjusted OR 1.22, 95% CI: 1.13-1.32), and pain-related ED visits (adjusted OR 1.39, 95% CI: 1.24-1.55). Patients who had preoperative COT were more likely to receive epidural or facet joint injections within 1 year after surgery (adjusted OR 1.68, 95% CI: 1.47-1.92). These patients were also more likely to undergo a repeat cervical fusion within a year than patients who did not have preoperative COT (adjusted OR 1.21, 95% CI: 1.01-1.43). Preoperative COT had a higher likelihood of long-term use after surgery (adjusted OR 4.72, 95% CI: 4.41-5.06). Long-term opioid use after surgery was associated with a higher risk of new-onsetconstipation (adjusted OR 1.34, 95% CI: 1.22-1.48). The risk of complications and adverse events was not found to be significant in patients with <3 months of preoperative opioid use or those who stopped opioids for at least 6 weeks before surgery. The cost of additional resource use for medications, ED visits, constipation, injections, and revision fusion ranged from $623 to $27,360 per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative opioid use among patients who underwent cervical fusion increases complication rates, postoperative opioid usage, health-care resource use, and costs. These risks may be reduced by restricting the duration of preoperative opioid use or weaning off before surgery. Better understanding and management of pain in the preoperative period with judicious use of opioids is critical to enhance outcomes after cervical fusion surgery.

Opioid use following cervical spine surgery: trends and factors associated with long-term use

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Limited or no data exist evaluating risk factors associated with prolonged opioid use following cervical arthrodesis.

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were to assess trends in postoperative narcotic use among preoperative opioid users (OUs) versus non-opioid users (NOUs) and to identify factors associated with postoperative narcotic use at 1 year following cervical arthrodesis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective observational study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample included 17,391 patients (OU: 52.4%) registered in the Humana Inc claims dataset who underwent anterior cervical fusion (ACF) or posterior cervical fusion (PCF) between 2007 and 2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Prolonged opioid usage was defined as narcotic prescription filling at 1 year following cervical arthrodesis.

METHODS

Based on preoperative opioid use, patients were identified as an OU (history of narcotic prescription filled within 3 months before surgery) or a NOU (no preoperative prescription). Rates of opioid use were evaluated preoperatively for OU and trended for 1 year postoperatively for both OU and NOU. Multivariable regression techniques investigated factors associated with the use of narcotics at 1 year following ACF and PCF. Based on the model findings, a web-based interactive app was developed to estimate 1-year postoperative risk of using narcotics following cervical arthrodesis (http://neuro-risk.com/opiod-use/ or https://www.neurosurgerycost.com/opioid/opioid_use).

RESULTS

Overall, 87.4% of the patients (n=15,204) underwent ACF, whereas 12.6% (n=2187) underwent PCF. At 1 month following surgery, 47.7% of NOUs and 82% of OUs had a filled opioid prescription. Rates of prescription opioids declined significantly to 7.8% in NOUs versus 50.5% in OUs at 3 months, but plateaued at the 6- to 12-month postoperative period (NOU: 5.7%-6.7%, OU: 44.9%-46.9%). At 1 year, significantly higher narcotic prescription filling rates were observed in OUs compared with NOUs (45.3% vs. 6.3%, p<.001). Preoperative opioid use was a significant driver of 1-year narcotic use following ACF (odds ratio [OR]: 7.02, p<.001) and PCF (OR: 6.98, p<.001), along with younger age (≤50 years), history of drug dependence, and lower back pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 50% of the patients used opioids before cervical arthrodesis. Postoperative opioid use fell dramatically during the first 3 months in NOU, but nearly half of the preoperative OUs will remain on narcotics at 1 year postoperatively. Our findings serve as a baseline in identifying patients at risk of chronic use and encourage discontinuation of opioids before cervical spine surgery.

What are the Rates, Reasons, and Risk Factors of 90-day Hospital Readmission After Lumbar Discectomy?: An Institutional Experience

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the rate, reasons, and risk factors for 90-day readmissions after lumbar discectomy at an academic medical center.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several studies have reported complications and readmissions after spine surgery; however, only one previous study has focused specifically on lumbar discectomy. As the patient profile and morbidity of various spine procedures is different, focus on procedure-specific complications and readmissions will be beneficial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent lumbar discectomy for unrelieved symptoms of prolapsed intervertebral disk and had at least 90 days of follow-up at an academic institution (2013-2014) were included. Retrospective review of electronic medical record was performed to record demographic and clinical profile of patients. Details of lumbar discectomy, index hospital stay, discharge disposition, hospital readmission within 90 days, reason for readmission and treatment given have been reported. Risk factors for hospital readmission were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients with a mean age of 45.0±13.8 years were included. The 90-day readmission rate was 5.3% (19/360) of which two-third patients were admitted within 30 days giving a 30-day readmission rate of 3.7% (13/356). The top 2 primary reasons for readmission included back and/or leg pain, numbness, or tingling (42.9%), and persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak or seroma (25.0%). On adjusted analysis, risk factors associated with higher risk of readmission included incidental durotomy [odds ratio (OR), 26.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3-129.9] and discharge to skilled nursing facility/inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 25.2; 95% CI, 2.7-235.2). Increasing age was a negative predictor of readmission (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental durotomy, younger age, and discharge to nursing facility were associated with higher risk of 90-day hospital readmission after lumbar discectomy. As compared with extensive spine procedures, patient comorbidity burden may not be as significant in predicting readmission after this relatively less invasive procedure.

Preoperative Chronic Opioid Therapy: A Risk Factor for Complications, Readmission, Continued Opioid Use and Increased Costs After One- and Two-Level Posterior Lumbar Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, economic analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To study patient profile associated with preoperative chronic opioid therapy (COT), and study COT as a risk factor for 90-day complications, emergency department (ED) visits, and readmission after primary one- to two-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF) for degenerative spine disease. We also evaluated associated costs, risk factors, and adverse events related to long-term postoperative opioid use.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Chronic opioid use is associated with poor outcomes and dependence after spine surgery. Risk factors, complications, readmissions, adverse events, and costs associated with COT in patients undergoing lumbar fusion are not entirely known. As providers look to reduce healthcare costs and improve outcomes, identification of modifiable risk factors is important.

METHODS

Commercial insurance data from 2007 to Q3-2015 was used to study preoperative opioid use in patients undergoing primary one- to two-level PLF. Ninety-day complications, ED visits, readmissions, 1-year adverse events, and associated costs have been described. Multiple-variable regression analyses were done to study preoperative COT patient profile and opioid use as a risk factor for complications and adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 24,610 patients with a mean age of 65.6 ± 11.5 years were included. Five thousand five hundred (22.3%) patients had documented opioid use for more than 6 months before surgery, and 87.4% of these had continued long-term use postoperatively. On adjusted analysis, preoperative COT was found to be a risk factor for 90-day wound complications, pain diagnoses, ED visits, readmission, and continued use postoperatively. Postspinal fusion long-term opioid users had an increased utilization of epidural/facet joint injections, risk for revision fusion, and increased incidence of new onset constipation within 1 year postsurgery. The cost associated with increase resource use in these patients has been reported.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative COT is a modifiable risk factor for complications, readmission, adverse events, and increased costs after one- or two-level PLF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Opioids delay healing of spinal fusion: a rabbit posterolateral lumbar fusion model

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Opioid use is prevalent in the management of pre- and postoperative pain in patients undergoing spinal fusion. There is evidence that opioids downregulate osteoblasts in vitro, and a previous study found that morphine delays the maturation and remodeling of callus in a rat femur fracture model. However, the effect of opioids on healing of spinal fusion has not been investigated before. Isolating the effect of opioid exposure in humans would be limited by the numerous confounding factors that affect fusion healing. Therefore, we have used a well-established rabbit model to study the process of spinal fusion healing that closely mimics humans.

PURPOSE

The objective of this work was to study the effect of systemic opioids on the process of healing of spinal fusion in a rabbit posterolateral spinal fusion model.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a preclinical animal study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-four adult New Zealand white rabbits were studied in two groups after approval from the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). The opioid group (n=12) received 4 weeks' preoperative and 6 weeks' postoperative transdermal fentanyl. Serum fentanyl levels were measured just before surgery and 4 weeks postoperatively to ensure adequate levels. The control group (n=12) received only perioperative pain control as necessary. All animals underwent a bilateral L5-L6 posterolateral spinal fusion using iliac crest autograft. Animals were euthanized at the 6-week postoperative time point, and assessment of fusion was done by manual palpation, plain radiographs, microcomputed tomography (microCT), and histology.

RESULTS

Twelve animals in the control group and 11 animals in the opioid group were available for analysis at the end of 6 weeks. The fusion scores on manual palpation, radiographs, and microCT were not statistically different. Three-dimensional microCT morphometry found that the fusion mass in the opioid group had a lower bone volume (p=.09), a lower trabecular number (p=.02), and a higher trabecular separation (p=.02) compared with the control group. Histologic analysis found areas of incorporation of autograft and unincorporated graft fragments in both groups. In the control group, there was remodeling of de novo woven bone to lamellar organization with incorporation of osteocytes, formation of mature marrow, and relative paucity of hypertrophied osteoblasts lining new bone. Sections from the opioid group showed formation of de novo woven bone, and hypertrophied osteoblasts were seen lining the new bone. There were no sections showing lamellar organization and development of mature marrow elements in the opioid group. Less dense trabeculae on microCT correlated with histologic findings of relatively immature fusion mass in the opioid group.

CONCLUSIONS

Systemic opioids led to an inferior quality fusion mass with delay in maturation and remodeling at 6 weeks in this rabbit spinal fusion model. These preliminary results lay the foundation for further research to investigate underlying cellular mechanisms, the temporal fusion process, and the dose-duration relationship of opioids responsible for our findings.

Opioid Utilization Following Lumbar Arthrodesis: Trends and Factors Associated With Long-term Use

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective, observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

In patients undergoing lumbar spine arthrodesis, we sought to establish perioperative trends in chronic versus naive opioid users (OUs) and identify modifiable risk factors associated with prolonged consumption.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The morbidity associated with excessive opioid use for chronic conditions continues to climb and has been identified as a national epidemic. Limiting excessive perioperative opioid use after procedures such as lumbar fusion remains a national health strategy.

METHODS

A national commercial claims dataset (2007-2015) was queried for all patients undergoing anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) and/or lumbar [posterior/transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (P/TLIF) or posterolateral fusion (PLF)] spinal fusion procedures. Patients were labeled as either an OU (prescription within 3 months pre-surgery) or opioid naive (ON, no prescription). Rates of opioid use were evaluated preoperatively for OU, and longitudinally tracked up to 1-year postoperatively for both OU and ON. Multivariable regression techniques investigated factors associated with opioid use at 1-year following surgery. In addition, a clinical calculator (app) was created to predict 1-year narcotic use.

RESULTS

Overall, 26,553 patients (OU: 58.3%) underwent lumbar surgery (ALIF: 8.5%; P/TLIF: 43.8%; PLF: 41.5%; ALIF+PLF: 6.2%). At 1-month postop, 60.2% ON and 82.9% OUs had a filled opioid prescription. At 3 months, prescription rates declined significantly to 13.9% in ON versus 53.8% in OUs, while plateauing at 6 to 12-month postoperative period (ON: 8.4-9.6%; OU: 42.1-45.3%). At 1 year, significantly higher narcotic prescription filling rates were observed in OUs than in ON (42.4% vs. 8.6%; P < 0.001). Preoperative opioid use was the strongest driver of 1-year narcotic use following ALIF [odds ratio (OR): 7.86; P < 0.001], P/TLIFs (OR: 4.62; P < 0.001), or PLF (OR: 7.18; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Approximately one-third patients chronically use opioids before lumbar arthrodesis and nearly half of the pre-op OUs will continue to use at 1 year. Our findings serve as a baseline in identifying patients at risk for chronic use and alter surgeons to work toward discontinuation of opioids before lumbar spinal surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Sustained Preoperative Opioid Use Is a Predictor of Continued Use Following Spine Surgery

BACKGROUND

Preoperative opioid use is known to increase the likelihood of complications and inferior outcomes following spine surgery. We evaluated the association of preoperative opioid use and other risk factors with postoperative opioid use.

METHODS

We queried 2006-2014 TRICARE insurance claims to identify adults who underwent lumbar interbody arthrodesis, lumbar discectomy, lumbar decompression, or lumbar posterolateral arthrodesis. The duration of preoperative opioid use was categorized as acute exposure, exposed without sustained use, intermediate sustained use, and chronic sustained use. Cox proportional-hazard models that adjusted for demographic factors, preoperative diagnoses, comorbidities, postoperative complications, and the type of procedure performed were used to identify factors associated with a reduced likelihood of opioid discontinuation following the surgical procedure.

RESULTS

There were 27,031 patients included in this analysis. Following the surgical procedure, 67.1% of patients had discontinued opioid use by 30 days, and 86.4% had ceased use by 90 days. Overall, 2,379 patients (8.8%) continued to use opioid medications at 6 months. Duration of preoperative opioid use, among other demographic and clinical factors, was the most important predictor of continued use following a surgical procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

The majority of patients who were using prescription opioids prior to the surgical procedure discontinued these medications postoperatively. Duration of preoperative use appears to be the most important predictor of sustained use following a surgical procedure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Our results indicate that the majority of patients who are using prescription opioids prior to spine surgery discontinue these medications following surgical intervention. Among those who continue opioid use ≥90 days after the surgical procedure, the duration of preoperative use appears to be the most important predictor.

Narcotics and Knee Arthroscopy: Trends in Use and Factors Associated With Prolonged Use and Postoperative Complications

PURPOSE

To (1) examine trends in the prevalence of preoperative and prolonged postoperative narcotic use in patients undergoing knee arthroscopy, (2) characterize factors associated with prolonged narcotic use after knee arthroscopy, and (3) explore the association of preoperative and prolonged postoperative narcotic use with complications after knee arthroscopy.

METHODS

The PearlDiver database was reviewed for patients who underwent knee arthroscopy from 2007 to 2015 with a minimum of 6 months' follow up. Patients with preoperative or prolonged postoperative narcotic use were identified and analyzed for trends. Predictors for prolonged postoperative use were identified, and regression analysis was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

RESULTS

A total of 75,372 patients were included, of which 23.9% used narcotics preoperatively and 22.6% used narcotics for a prolonged period postoperatively. There was no statistically significant trend on a year-to-year basis in preoperative (P = .744) or prolonged postoperative (P = .304) narcotic use. The most significant predictor for prolonged postoperative use was preoperative use (OR 5.33, CI 5.11-5.56, P < .0001), with the odds increasing as the number of preoperative prescriptions increased. Preoperative narcotic use was associated with increased emergency department visits (OR 1.25, CI 1.15-1.36, P < .0001), hospital admission (OR 1.15, CI 1.00-1.33, P = .046), and infection (OR 1.31, CI 1.07-1.59, P = .007). Prolonged postoperative narcotic use was associated with subsequent ipsilateral knee arthroscopy (OR 1.64, CI 1.45-1.86, P < .0001) as well as subsequent knee arthroplasty (OR 1.98, CI 1.83-2.14, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study did not show a trend in the use of narcotics, preoperatively or on a prolonged basis postoperatively, during the study period. The degree of preoperative narcotic use is correlated with prolonged narcotic use. The use of narcotics preoperatively and for a prolonged period postoperatively is associated with increased complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level IV, case series, therapeutic.

Narcotic-Dependent Patients Derive Equal Benefit from Enhanced Recovery

Areas of the southeast United States have endemic levels of prescription drug use, diversion, and abuse. Because preoperative narcotics use is associated with increased surgical morbidity and increased readmission rates, there is a compelling need to categorize health outcomes of patients maintaining an active opioid prescription. The purpose of this study is to determine the health outcomes of preoperative narcotic users who undergo colorectal surgery within the enhanced recovery (ER) protocol, a set of multimodal interventions designed to reduce postoperative complications. Five hundred and five colorectal surgery patients were identified within the ER protocol at Carilion Clinic. Opioid dependence was defined as an active prescription for 30 days before surgery. Thirty-day outcome variables were defined by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. One hundred and one patients were identified as opioid dependent and 404 as opioid naïve. Groups were comparable in terms of age at surgery, mean body mass index, and presurgical physical classification. Groups fared similarly with regard to readmission (χ2, P > 0.999), reoperation (χ2, P = 0.869), and average length of stay [t(135) = 1.49, P = 0.137]. These preliminary data show that opioid-dependent patients derive benefit equal to opioid-naïve patients within the ER protocol.

Factors Affecting Long-Term Postoperative Narcotic Use in Discectomy Patients

BACKGROUND

Long-term narcotic use has risks and potentially life-threatening opioid-related side effects. Extended narcotic use in patients undergoing discectomy raises concerns of other underlying causes of pain or overprescription and/or abuse. The goal of this study was to determine which factors have an effect on active narcotic prescription >3 months after discectomy.

METHODS

The PearlDiver Database was used in this study. Patients 30-55 years old undergoing discectomy without fusions were queried for active narcotic drug prescription occurring >30 days and >3 months after original surgery. Medical co-diagnoses were independently analyzed for effects on long-term active narcotic prescriptions. Prior narcotic use was defined by use within 4 months before surgery.

RESULTS

Of 1321 patients undergoing discectomy, 621 had actively prescribed narcotics >3 months after surgery. Preoperative narcotic use had the largest effect on odds of postoperative prescription (odds ratio [OR] = 3.4). Medical comorbidities increasing odds of long-term narcotic prescriptions included migraines (OR = 1.4), diabetes mellitus (OR = 1.4), depression (OR = 1.6), and smoking (OR = 1.9).

CONCLUSIONS

Narcotic abuse is a serious problem rooted in overprescription of these drugs, which has ultimately led to much more caution in prescribing among physicians. Because pain management and drug prescription must be balanced, identifying patients who may be susceptible to narcotic overprescription is important. Patients with co-diagnoses increasing odds of long-term narcotic prescriptions would benefit from early and continual postsurgical follow-up to ensure accurate pain management and to determine if narcotic prescriptions are justly warranted in the later postoperative period.