Epidural Steroids After a Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy

Methylprednisolone Following Minimally Invasive Lumbar Decompression: A Large Prospective Single-Institution Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective randomized.

OBJECTIVE

Intraoperative methylprednisolone is a common adjunct following microscopic laminectomy/microdiscectomy. The goal of epidural instillation is a rapid symptomatic reduction in irritation of neural elements. There is inconsistent data supporting its use intraoperatively. To understand whether this maneuver results in any clinical effect, we performed a multiyear prospective study.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Previous work has demonstrated equivocal effects on pain with a suggestion of an increased risk of complication. These studies tend to suffer from small sample sizes and short follow-ups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study obtained IRB approval. During the study period from 2013 to 2019, nearly equivalent numbers of patients who had received steroids during MIS decompressions were followed. Primary outcomes included pain (visual analog scale) and disability [Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)] at 2 weeks and 4 months. Secondary outcomes included complications, readmissions, and reoperation rates during the study period.

RESULTS

Four hundred eighty-six patients were followed for a mean follow-up of 5.17 years. The index case was more likely to be a revision surgery in the steroid group. Across all patients, there was no difference in pain at 2 weeks or 4 months. Disability was reduced at 2 weeks in the steroid group (ODI: 16.71 vs . 21.02, P = 0.04) but not at 4 months. By subgroup analysis, this is largely explained by ODI reduction in patients with high preoperative ODI (13.00 vs . 43.43, P = 0.03). Patients in the steroid cohort were more likely to undergo subsequent spinal surgery during the study period.

CONCLUSION

Methylprednisolone instillation is associated with a large, transient reduction in ODI for patients with high preoperative ODI; there is no measurable effect on pain. There is equivocal effect on risk of subsequent reoperation. This issue was clarified in peer review but changes did not make it to the abstract. Therefore, the technique is likely best reserved for patients with significant preoperative disability.

Different approaches to percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To observe the surgical procedure and outcome of percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for L5/S1 lumbar disc herniation (LDH) by the interlaminar and transforaminal approach.

METHODS

A total of 153 patients with L5/S1 LDH who were treated using percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD, n = 84) or percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID, n = 69) from January 2016 to January 2018 were enrolled in this retrospective study. The time of puncture, operation under the endoscope, total operation and number of fluoroscopy of the two groups were compared. All groups were followed up for two years by using the Oswestry disability index (ODI) and the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS). Additionally, the incidence of complications, reoperation and postoperative low back pain were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were no significant difference in general information between the two groups. Compared to the PEID group, the PETD group had a decreased operation time under the endoscope and an increased puncture time, total operation time, and the number of fluoroscopy (p < 0.05). The preoperative VAS and ODI scores of the PETD and PEID group were decreased at the last follow-up (p < 0.05). There were no difference in the preoperative or last follow-up VAS and ODI scores, as well as complications, reoperation between the two groups (p > 0.05). The incidence of postoperative low back pain in the PETD group was lower than that in the PEID group (p > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The two-year clinical outcome of PETD is equal to that of PEID for L5/S1 LDH. Compared to those with PETD, the puncture time, total operation time and radiation exposure are lower with PEID, but the incidence of postoperative low back pain is higher.

Nomogram for predicting the unfavourable outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy for lumbar disc herniation: a retrospective study

Objective

To investigate and integrate multiple independent risk factors to establish a nomogram for predicting the unfavourable outcomes of percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for lumbar disc herniation (LDH).

Methods

From January 2018 to December 2019, a total of 425 patients with LDH undergoing PETD were included in this retrospective study. All patients were divided into the development and validation cohort at a ratio of 4:1. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to investigate the independent risk factors associated with the clinical outcomes of PETD for LDH in the development cohort, and a prediction model (nomogram) was established to predict the unfavourable outcomes of PETD for LDH. In the validation cohort, the nomogram was validated by the concordance index (C-index), calibration curve, and decision curve analysis (DCA).

Results

29 of 340 patients showed unfavourable outcomes in the development cohort, and 7 of 85 patients showed unfavourable outcomes in the validation cohort. Body mass index (BMI), course of disease (COD), protrusion calcification (PC), and preoperative lumbar epidural steroid injection (LI) were independent risk factors associated with the unfavourable outcomes of PETD for LDH and were identified as predictors for the nomogram. The nomogram was validated by the validation cohort and showed high consistency (C-index = 0.674), good calibration and high clinical value.

Conclusions

The nomogram based on patients' preoperative clinical characteristics, including BMI, COD, LI and PC, can be used to accurately predict the unfavourable outcomes of PETD for LDH.

Effects of local intraoperative epidural use of triamcinolone acetonide-soaked Gelfoam on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial

OBJECTIVE

Prior evidence has supported the use of local intraoperative epidural steroids in lumbar discectomy for improvements in postoperative pain and outcomes. However, currently there is a paucity of data regarding the efficacy of local epidural steroids in spinal fusion procedures. The present investigation aimed to evaluate the impact of local epidural administration of triamcinolone acetonide-soaked Gelfoam on postoperative pain and patient-reported outcomes in patients undergoing instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion.

METHODS

In this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, patients were randomly divided into two groups (treatment and control). Patients in the treatment group received a Gelfoam carrier soaked in 1 ml of triamcinolone acetonide (40 mg), which was placed over the nerve roots in the epidural space before the closure. Patients in the control group received a Gelfoam carrier soaked in normal saline in a similar fashion to the treatment group. Patients were followed up during their hospital stay and at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. The primary outcome measure was early postoperative visual analog scale (VAS) scores for pain both at rest and with movement.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were recruited in this study and were randomly allocated to the treatment or control group. No significant difference was found in baseline demographic, clinical, and surgical characteristics between the two groups. Postoperative VAS scores for pain both at rest and with movement were comparable between the treatment and control groups. Cumulative morphine consumption, length of hospital stay, and incidence of postoperative complications such as surgical site infection were also similar between the two groups. There was no significant difference in patient-reported outcomes including VAS scores for back and leg pain as well as the Oswestry Disability Index at 4 and 12 weeks postoperatively. The proportion of patients who achieved a minimum clinically important difference for patient-reported outcomes were also similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In contrast to the existing literature on the beneficial use of local intraoperative epidural steroids in conventional lumbar discectomy, the present study did not demonstrate such significant efficacy for the use of local epidural steroids in instrumented posterolateral lumbar spinal fusion. However, there is still a lack of evidence in this regard and further high-quality clinical trials are required to evaluate the efficacy of local epidural steroids in this group of patients.

The feasibility and safety of cocktail treatment of triple anti-inflammatory agents loaded with gelatin sponge promotes early recovery after posterior percutaneous endoscopic cervical discectomy

Purpose

To investigate whether a cocktail therapy of dexamethasone, ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine, and vitamin B12 can achieve satisfactory pain relief and promote early functional recovery after PPECD.

Methods

Eighty single-level patients with CDH who received PPECD were retrospectively divided into two groups: the cocktail and control groups. Clinical data were recorded and evaluated by a dedicated physician who was not involved in the patient’s treatment. The primary clinical outcomes included visual analog scores (VASs) for upper limber pain and neck disability index (NDI) scores. The follow-up time points were preoperatively and postoperative 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months. The modified MacNab criteria was used to evaluate the surgical effect of the last follow-up.

Results

The follow-up data of 74 cases were complete, except 6 cases lost to follow-up. There was no significant difference between the two groups in demographics, duration of symptoms, operation stage (p > 0.05), and operation time (80.5 ± 5.5 vs. 81.5 ± 3.5 min). The VAS in the upper limbs pain was significantly higher postoperatively than preoperatively in both groups (p < 0.05). The cocktail group had a lower VAS than the control group 1 week postoperatively (p < 0.05); however, VAS not different between groups at the remaining time points. The NDI scores were significantly better postoperatively than preoperatively, and no significant differences were seen when comparing nodes at postoperative follow-up (p > 0.05). In the control group, two cases with foraminal stenosis were found to have unrelieved pain in the early postoperative period, but the pain was relieved at the final follow-up and did not convert to open decompression surgery.

Conclusions

Cocktail treatment, in which a drug sustained-release material made of gelatin sponge was impregnated with dexamethasone, ropivacaine, dexmedetomidine and vitamin B12, facilitates pain relief and early postoperative recovery after PPECD.

Cave-in Decompression Technique in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy for Ossification Occupation in Lumbar Spinal Canal: A retrospective analysis of 23 cases

OBJECT

Percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) for the treatment of ossification occupation of the lumbar spinal canal is technically demanding. The purpose of this study was to describe an endoscopic cave-in decompression technique in PETD for ossification occupation of the lumbar spinal canal and to report the clinical results.

METHODS

From May 2018 to June 2020, 23 consecutive cases, diagnosed in our institution as ventral ossification in the lumbar spinal canal and treated with PETD, were evaluated. The endoscopic cave-in decompression technique was performed. We analyzed the clinical outcomes on a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). Perioperative data and complications rate were also recorded.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 15.7 ± 2.8 months. Mean preoperative VAS score for low-back pain was 5.65 ± 1.43, and decreased to 0.57 ± 0.5 at final follow-up. Mean preoperative VAS score for leg pain was 5.48 ± 1.38, and decreased to 0.56 ± 0.5 at final follow-up. Mean preoperative ODI score decreased from 33.04 ± 5.28 preoperatively to 8.7 ± 2.54 at last follow-up. One patient experienced transient postoperative hypoesthesia, and 1 developed a mild transient decline in muscle strength; both recovered progressively. Postoperative CT and MRI showed that the ossification was effectively removed and the nerve root and dural mater was completely decompressed in all cases.

CONCLUSION

The endoscopic cave-in decompression technique in PETD is a safe and effective treatment method for selected patients with ossification occupation of the lumbar spinal canal.

Outcomes of epidural steroids following percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Percutaneous transforaminal endoscopic discectomy (PTED) has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases. Epidural injection of steroids can reduce the incidence and duration of postoperative pain in a short period of time. Although steroids are widely believed to reduce the effect of surgical trauma, the observation indicators are not uniform, especially the long-term effects, so the problem remains controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this paper was to evaluate the efficacy of epidural steroids following PTED.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Database from 1980 to June 2021 to identify randomized and non-randomized controlled trials comparing epidural steroids and saline alone following PTED. The primary outcomes included postoperative pain at least 6 months as assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI). The secondary outcomes included length of hospital stay and the time of return to work.

Results

A total of 451 patients were included in three randomized and two non-randomized controlled trials. The primary outcomes, including VAS and ODI scores, did not differ significantly between epidural steroids following PTED and saline alone. There were no significant intergroup differences in length of hospital stay. Epidural steroids were shown to be superior in terms of the time to return to work (P < 0.001).

Conclusions

Intraoperative epidural steroids did not provide significant benefits, leg pain control, improvement in ODI scores, and length of stay in the hospital, but it can enable the patient to return to work faster.

Epidural steroids following percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Percutaneous endoscopic interlaminar discectomy (PEID) has been widely used in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation and spinal stenosis, epidural steroids following PEID in an effort to reduce the incidence and duration of postoperative pain. Although steroids are widely thought to reduce the effect of surgical trauma, the observation index is not uniform, so the issue is still controversial. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of local epidural steroids application following PEID.

METHODS

We will search the following databases from their inception to August 2020, PubMed, Embase, Medline, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Literature Database, Web of Science, Wan Fang Database, Cochrane Library. The search strategy includes the MeSH terms. Meta-analysis will be performed using Rev Man V.5.3.5 statistical software.

RESULTS

This study will provide a high-quality synthesis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of local epidural steroids following PEID.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review will provide evidence to judge whether local epidural steroids application following PEID is an effective and safe intervention for patients. It will provide reliable evidence for its extensive application.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

INPLASY2020100085.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Discectomy for Hard or Calcified Lumbar Disc Herniation: A New Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Hard or calcified discs are often adherent to surrounding nerve tissue. The whole herniated disc is difficult to remove by pulling part of the hernia mass, which makes obtaining good results through endoscopic treatment difficult. The purpose of this study was to describe the details of the transforaminal endoscopic lumbar discectomy technique for a hard or calcified disc and report the clinical results.

METHODS

From October 2016 to June 2019, 43 consecutive cases diagnosed as hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation at our institution and treated with transforaminal endoscopic discectomy were evaluated. Endoscopic decompression was performed in patients with hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation.

RESULTS

The preoperative visual analog scale score for leg pain (mean ± standard deviation) was 7.09 ± 1.74. The score improved to 2.55 ± 1.35 at 1 week postoperatively, 1.88 ± 1.29 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 1.58 ± 1.0 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01 for all). The preoperative Oswestry Disability Index (mean ± standard deviation) was 55.4 ± 23.04, which improved to 30.89 ± 13.64 at 1 week postoperatively, 23.08 ± 11.64 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 16.42 ± 9.76 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01 for all). Two patients developed a dural laceration. Both patients were discharged after several hours of observation. None of the patients had postoperative infection, epidural hematoma, or delayed neurological deterioration.

CONCLUSIONS

Transforaminal endoscopic discectomy could be an effective treatment method for a selected group of patients with hard or calcified lumbar disc herniation.

Full-Endoscopic Lumbar Foraminoplasty for Symptomatic Cement Leakage with Exiting Nerve Root Impingement

BACKGROUND

Foraminal stenosis, a common disorder occurring in elderly patients, is often caused by narrowing of the foramen, resulting in the confinement of neural structures by the tissue and vertebrae. Full-endoscopic lumbar foraminoplasty (FELF) is an effective treatment option for patients with foraminal stenosis. However, to the best of our knowledge, no previous study has reported the treatment of symptomatic cement leakage. We report a case of symptomatic cement leakage treated with FELF with the patient under local anesthesia.

CASE DESCRIPTION

An 85-year-old woman was admitted to our spine unit because of lower back pain. The patient had presented with lower back pain and new-onset left thigh pain after vertebroplasty performed 3 months previously. The patient was not able to walk and was bedridden. To overcome this problem, T12 percutaneous vertebroplasty and left transforaminal L3-L4 foraminoplasty was performed with the patient under local anesthesia. After surgery, the patient was able to walk and was discharged 4 days postoperatively.

CONCLUSION

The present report has shown that FELF can successfully remove symptomatic cement leakage, resulting in pain relief.

Impact of local steroid application in a minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: results of a prospective, randomized, single-blind trial

OBJECTIVELocal epidural steroid application may be associated with decreased pain and narcotic use in the immediate postoperative period following lumbar discectomy. However, local steroid delivery following lumbar fusion procedures has not been well characterized. This study aims to characterize the effect of local intraoperative depomedrol application on perioperative and postoperative outcomes following a single-level minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS TLIF).METHODSA prospective, randomized, single-blinded study was performed. A priori power analysis determined that 86 patients were needed to detect a difference of 1 point in the visual analog scale (VAS) pain score between groups. Ninety-three patients were randomized into depomedrol (DEPO) and no depomedrol (NODEPO) cohorts. Prior to surgical closure, DEPO patients received 1 ml depomedrol (80 mg) applied directly to the surgical site by using a Gelfoam carrier. NODEPO patients received 1 ml saline on the same Gelfoam carrier. Perioperative outcomes including acute postoperative pain and narcotic use were assessed for the duration of inpatient stay. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) questionnaires including VAS back and leg pain scores, and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were administered preoperatively and at 6-week, 12-week, and 6-month follow-up. Outcomes for DEPO and NODEPO cohorts were compared using linear regression controlled for sex.RESULTSOf the 93 patients, 45 (48.4%) were randomized to DEPO and 48 (51.6%) to NODEPO. A greater percentage of DEPO patients were female (53.3% vs 27.1%, p = 0.010). There were no other significant differences in patient baseline characteristics. Similarly, operating time, estimated blood loss, and length of inpatient stay did not differ between cohorts. Patients in the DEPO cohort consumed fewer hourly narcotics on postoperative day 0 (5.3 vs 6.3 oral morphine equivalents/hour, p = 0.034). However, no differences in acute postoperative pain or total narcotics consumption were observed between groups. Preoperative VAS leg scores were statistically different between cohorts (p = 0.027). However, preoperative ODI and VAS back scores did not differ between groups. Additionally, DEPO and NODEPO groups experienced similar improvements in PROs at all postoperative time points.CONCLUSIONSLocal depomedrol use did not lead to decreases in acute postoperative pain or narcotics consumption after MIS TLIF. Additionally, local depomedrol was not associated with postoperative improvements in PROs. The findings of this randomized trial suggest that surgical and clinical outcomes following MIS TLIF may not be impacted by intraoperative application of depomedrol.Clinical trial registration no.: NCT03308084 (clinicaltrials.gov).

Acupotomy therapy for lumbar disc herniation: Protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is a clinically common degenerative spinal disease that adversely affects patients' quality of life and work ability. Although several articles have reported that acupotomy can improve the clinical symptoms of LDH, the efficiency of acupotomy has not been scientifically or methodically evaluated. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate and synthesize evidence on the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy therapy in patients with LDH.

METHOD

We plan to search eight English and Chinese electronic databases, including the Web of Science, Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, SinoMed, Wanfang, China Science and Technology Journal (VIP), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) databases, for potentially eligible studies. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on acupotomy treatment in LDH patients will be searched for independently by 2 reviewers in the databases from their inception to August 2018. We will combine data from clinically homogenous studies in a fixed effect meta-analysis using RevManV.5.3.5, and the evidence level will be assessed by using the method for Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE).

RESULTS

This systematic review and meta-analysis will use high-quality evidence-based medicine to assess the efficacy and safety of acupotomy therapy in LDH.

CONCLUSION

This study protocol will provide strong evidence to determine whether acupotomy therapy is an effective and safe intervention for patients with LDH.

Effectiveness and safety of acupotomy for treating back and/or leg pain in patients with lumbar disc herniation: A study protocol for a multicenter, randomized, controlled, clinical trial

BACKGROUND

As the number of patients suffering from back and/or leg pain due to lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is increasing in Korea, conservative treatments for patients with LDH have been spotlighted. Although several studies have been published on the use of acupotomy for the treatment of such patients, most of them are only case studies. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy to those for manual acupuncture for the treatment of patients with LDH.

METHODS/DESIGN

This study is planned as a multicenter, parallel design, randomized, controlled, clinical study. One hundred forty-six patients diagnosed with LDH will be randomly assigned to either the acupotomy group or the manual acupuncture group at a 1:1 ratio. Participants in both groups will receive a total of 4 interventions over 2 weeks. An effectiveness assessment based on the outcomes on the visual analog scale (VAS), Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMDQ), Modified-Modified Schober Test (MMST), EuroQol Five Dimensions (EQ-5D), and Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) will be conducted at baseline and at 2, 4, and 6 weeks postrandomization. The primary outcome will be the mean change in the VAS for back and/or leg pain 4 weeks postrandomization. Adverse events will be recorded at every visit.

DISCUSSION

The results of this study will provide evidence for the effectiveness and safety of acupotomy treatment for patients with LDH.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Research Information Service of South Korea (CRIS- KCT0002824), April 24, 2018.

Comparative Outcomes of Perioperative Epidural Steroids After Percutaneous Endoscopic Lumbar Discectomy for Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

To assess postoperative outcomes and complications after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD) with or without epidural steroids (ES) administration in lumbar disc herniation.

METHODS

In a double-blind randomized, placebo-controlled trial at Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, from May 2014 to May 2015, 30 patients were randomly allocated to receive ES or placebo (saline) after PELD. The primary outcome was 24-hour morphine consumption. Secondary outcomes were visual analog scale (VAS) scores for leg and back pain, Oswestry Disability Index score, Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire score, and complications at 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean patient age was 60.0 years, and 0.57% of patients were male. Mean VAS back pain, VAS leg pain, Oswestry Disability Index, and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire scores at baseline were 4.7, 6.1, 24.9, 17.5 in the ES group and 5.1, 5.5, 24.7, 16.7 in the placebo group, respectively. Mean morphine requirements measured at 8, 16, and 24 hours were 3.47, 2.67, and <0.001 in the ES group and 3.13, 1.67, and 0.40 in the placebo group. The mean VAS scores measured at 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours were 2.99, 2.70, 2.56, 3.30, 3.05, and 2.05 the ES group and 3.13, 1.13, 1.26, 1.65, 1.22, and 1.08 in placebo group. The difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05 for all).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of ES with PELD for lumbar disc herniation does not improve postoperative pain, morphine requirements, or disability scores in the short-term and midterm periods.

Epidural versus intravenous steroids application following percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy

Retrospectively study.The purpose of this study was to compare the effects of intraoperative epidural steroids and single dose intravenous steroids following a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).Inflammatory irritation of dorsal root ganglia or sensory nerve roots may cause postoperative pain. Epidural steroids have been applied after a lumbar discectomy for more than 20 years. Epidural steroid application after a PELD is easier to perform and safer because the operations are under observation of the scope.We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with lumbar intervertebral disc herniation who had undergone transforaminal PELD at our department. There are 60 patients in epidural steroid group, intravenous steroid group, and control group, respectively. Visual analog scores (VAS) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were collected. Successful pain control is defined as 50% or more reduction in back and leg pain (VAS scores).VAS scores (back and leg) and ODI showed a significant decrease in all groups when comparing pre- and postoperatively. Epidural steroid group had a significant improvement in successful pain control compared with the control group at 2 weeks of follow-up. VAS scores (leg) in the epidural steroid group showed a significant decrease compared with the intravenous steroids group at 1, 3, and 7 days after the surgery, but this difference had no statistical significance at 1, 6, and 12 months of follow-up. All groups did not show a significant difference in ODI at 1, 6, and 12 months follow-up.Epidural application of steroid has a better effect on controlling the postoperative pain of PELD in the short term. The epidural application of steroid did not show a tendency to cause infection.

Transforaminal Endoscopic Decompression for Lumbar Spinal Stenosis: A Novel Surgical Technique and Clinical Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

Transforaminal endoscopic treatment has been reported to be an effective treatment option in patients with lumbar disc herniation. However, it is rarely performed for spinal stenosis because of the limitation of endoscopic working mobility caused by the exiting nerve root and foraminous bony structure. The objective of this study was to describe a novel transforaminal endoscopic decompression technique for spinal stenosis and report the clinical results.

METHODS

From October 2015 to October 2016, 30 consecutive cases were diagnosed as lateral recess stenosis in our institution and underwent transforaminal endoscopic decompression. Visual analog scale (VAS) of back and leg pain and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were measured preoperatively and at follow-up.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD value of preoperative VAS leg pain score was 7.6 ± 1.17. The score improved to 2.2 ± 1.11 at 1 week postoperatively, 1.73 ± 0.96 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 1.63 ± 0.95 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01). The mean ± SD value of the preoperative ODI score was 65.69 ± 14.22. The score improved to 24.29 ± 11.89 at 1 week postoperatively, 21.25 ± 9.25 at 4 weeks postoperatively, and 15.62 ± 10.49 at 26 weeks postoperatively (P < 0.01). There were no patients with postoperative infection, dural tear, delayed neurologic deterioration, or conversion to open surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Transforaminal endoscopic decompression under local anesthesia could be an effective treatment method for the selected group of patients with spinal stenosis.

Efficacy of intraoperative epidural triamcinolone application in lumbar microdiscectomy: a matched-control study

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to investigate whether the intraoperative application of an epidural steroid (ES) on the decompressed nerve root improves short- and midterm subjective and objective clinical outcomes after lumbar microdiscectomy.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective analysis of a 2-center database including consecutive cases in which patients underwent lumbar microdiscectomy. All patients who received ES application (40 mg triamcinolone, ES group) were matched by age and sex to patients who had not received ES application (control group). Objective functional impairment (OFI) was determined using age- and sex-adjusted T-scores of the Timed Up and Go (TUG) test. Back and leg pain (visual analog scale), functional impairment (Oswestry Disability Index [ODI], Roland-Morris Disability Index [RMDI], and health-related quality of life (hrQoL; 12-Item Short Form Health Survey [SF-12] physical component summary [PSC] score and EuroQol [EQ-5D index]) were measured at baseline, on postoperative day 3, and at postoperative week 6.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients who received ES application were matched with 101 controls. There were no baseline demographic or disease-specific differences between the study groups, and preoperative pain, functional impairment, and hrQoL were similar. On postoperative day 3, the ES group had less disability on the RMDI (mean 7.4 vs 10.3, p = 0.003) and higher hrQoL as determined by the SF-12 PCS (36.5 vs 32.7, p = 0.004). At week 6, the ES group had less disability on the RMDI (3.6 vs 5.7, p = 0.050) and on the ODI by trend (17.0 vs 24.4, p = 0.056); better hrQoL, determined by the SF-12 PCS (44.3 vs 39.9, p = 0.018); and lower OFI (TUG test T-score 100.5 vs 110.2, p = 0.005). The week 6 responder status based on the minimum clinically important difference (MCID) was similar in the ES and control groups for each metric. The rates and severity of complications were similar, with a 3.8% and 4.0% reoperation rate in the ES group and control group, respectively (p = 0.272). There was a tendency for shorter hospitalization in the ES group (5.0 vs 5.8 days, p = 0.066).

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative ES application on the decompressed nerve root is an effective adjunct treatment that may lower subjective and objective functional impairment and increase hrQoL in the short and intermediate term after lumbar microdiscectomy. However, group differences were lower than the commonly accepted MCIDs for each metric, indicating that the effect size of the benefit is limited.

■ CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE Type of question: therapeutic; study design: retrospective cohort trial; evidence: Class II.

Epidural Steroids at Closure After Microdiscectomy/Laminectomy for Reduction of Postoperative Analgesia: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

This review assessed the efficacy of epidural steroid administration on the reduction of pain, hospital stay time, and use of opioid analgesics postoperatively.

METHODS

We searched Medline, PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews for studies using epidural steroids through any route after lumbar surgery. The primary study outcomes included preoperative and postoperative pain as assessed with a visual analogue scale (VAS), length of hospital stay (LOS), and postoperative use of opioid analgesics. The data were extracted and stratified according to the steroid administered. Data were then assessed for heterogeneity, subgroup differences, and ultimately tabulated in a Forest plot.

RESULTS

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials were included in this review, with 16 undergoing quantitative analysis. Steroids were shown to be superior in terms of VAS outcome at 24 hours, with triamcinolone and dexamethasone performing similarly. Methylprednisolone paradoxically performed worse at the 24-hour mark. At 1 month, all steroids illustrated superiority in terms of VAS outcome. Steroids also proved superior in reducing LOS and postoperative use of opioid analgesia.

CONCLUSIONS

Intraoperative or perioperative epidural administration of steroids offers significant benefits in terms of pain control, reduction in LOS, and use of postoperative opioid analgesia. Before steroids are routinely used by spinal surgeons, however, significantly more research is required. A particular emphasis should be placed on quality study protocols and data recording, to allow for more thorough analyses in the future.

Effectiveness and safety of acupotomy for lumbar disc herniation: a study protocol for a randomized, assessor-blinded, controlled pilot trial

BACKGROUND

Acupotomy aims to reduce pressure on the nerve, improve surrounding blood circulation, and recover the kinetic state of soft tissue in treating lumbar disc herniation. Although several previous studies have suggested the potential use and substantial benefits of acupotomy, there is still insufficient evidence regarding this technique. This trial is designed to determine if acupotomy is more effective than manual acupuncture in improving low back pain and/or leg pain, disability, lumbar mobility, and quality of life in patients with herniated lumbar disc.

METHODS

Fifty eligible patients will be randomly assigned to an acupotomy group or a manual acupuncture group in a 1:1 ratio. The experimental group will receive acupotomy at the affected side's inner core muscles and soft tissue at the level of the herniated disc where tenderness appears (twice per week for 2 weeks). The control group will receive manual acupuncture (thrice per week for 2 weeks) at GV3 (Yaoyangguan) and the bilateral BL23 (Shenshu), BL24 (Qihaishu), BL25 (Dachangshu), and BL26 (guanyuanshu) for local points and the bilateral GB30 (Huantio), BL40 (Weizhong), and BL60 (Kunlun) for distant points. The primary outcome will be the mean change in the visual analog scale from baseline to 4 weeks (2 weeks after final treatment). The Oswestry Disability Index, Modified-Modified Schober Test, and EuroQol five dimensions questionnaire will determine secondary outcomes. Adverse events will be evaluated at every visit.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide valuable data and insights for a confirmative, full-scale randomized controlled trial to determine the clinical effects of acupotomy.

A retrospective study of epidural and intravenous steroids after percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy for large lumbar disc herniation

OBJECTIVE

To assess the early curative effect of epidural or intravenous administration of steroids during a percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy (PELD).

METHODS

28 consecutive patients who underwent PELD due to large lumbar disc herniation between November 2014 and January 2016 were followed up for 6 months. These patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment they received after PELD. 14 patients (Group A) were treated by PELD and epidural steroids, while the other 14 patients (Group B) were treated by PELD and intravenous steroids. We evaluated the effectiveness by the preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) scores for back and leg pain, and the postoperative Oswestry disability index (ODI) at 3 weeks after surgery via the clinical charts and telephone interview. Postoperative hospital stay and time return to work were investigated as well.

RESULTS

There is a significant decrease in VAS (back, leg), ODI, and time return to work (p < 0.05). For VAS (back), Group A showed a significant decrease compared with Group B at 1 day and 1 week after surgery (p = 0.011, p = 0.017). As for VAS (leg), Group A showed a significant decrease compared with Group B at 1 day, 1 week, 3 weeks, and 3 months follow-up examinations (p = 0.002, p = 0.006, p < 0.001, p < 0.001). For ODI, Group A showed a notable decrease compared with Group B (p < 0.001). The postoperative hospital stay in two groups was not statistically different (p = 0.636). But the time return to work in Group A was significantly shorter than that in Group B (p = 0.023).

CONCLUSION

Patients who underwent PELD with epidural steroid administration for large lumbar disc herniation showed favorable curative effect compared with those who underwent PELD with intravenous steroid administration.