Incidence and Risk Factors of Postoperative Hematoma Requiring Reoperation in Single-level Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Risk factors of epidural hematoma in patients undergoing spinal surgery: a meta-analysis of 29 cohort studies

OBJECTIVE

The authors conducted this meta-analysis to identify risk factors for spinal epidural haematoma (SEH) among patients following spinal surgery.

METHODS

The authors systematically searched Pub: Med, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles that reported risk factors associated with the development of SEH in patients undergoing spinal surgery from inception to 2 July 2022. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was estimated using a random-effects model for each investigated factor. The evidence of observational studies was classified as high quality (Class I), moderate quality (Class II or III) and low quality (Class IV) based on sample size, Egger's P value and between-study heterogeneity. In addition, subgroup analyses stratified by study baseline characteristics and leave-one-out sensitivity analyses were performed to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity and the stability of the results.

RESULTS

Of 21 791 articles screened, 29 unique cohort studies comprising 150 252 patients were included in the data synthesis. Studies with high-quality evidence showed that older patients (≥60 years) (OR, 1.35; 95% CI, 1.03-1.77) were at higher risk for SEH. Studies with moderate-quality evidence suggested that patients with a BMI greater than or equal to 25 kg/m² (OR, 1.39; 95% CI, 1.10-1.76), hypertension (OR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.28-2.17), and diabetes (OR, 1.25; 95% CI, 1.01-1.55) and those undergoing revision surgery (OR, 1.92; 95% CI, 1.15-3.25) and multilevel procedures (OR, 5.20; 95% CI, 2.89-9.37) were at higher risk for SEH. Meta-analysis revealed no association between tobacco use, operative time, anticoagulant use or American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification and SEH.

CONCLUSIONS

Obvious risk factors for SEH include four patient-related risk factors, including older age, obesity, hypertension and diabetes, and two surgery-related risk factors, including revision surgery and multilevel procedures. These findings, however, must be interpreted with caution because most of these risk factors had small effect sizes. Nonetheless, they may help clinicians identify high-risk patients to improve prognosis.

The Risk of Adverse Events in Smokers Undergoing Spinal Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Determine if tobacco use is associated with increased risk of postoperative adverse events within 90 days in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery.

METHODS

Databases were queried to identify cohort studies that directly compared smokers with non-smokers and provided the absolute number of adverse events and the population at risk. Data quality was evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Risk ratios (RR) and 95% confidence intervals were calculated and compared between studies. The grading of recommendation, assessment, development and evaluation (GRADE) criteria were used to assess the strength of the evidence.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies assessing 37 897 participants met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 10 031 (26.5%) were smokers and 27 866 (73.5%) were nonsmokers. The mean age for the study population was 58 years, and 45% were males. Smoking was not associated with increased risk of one or more major adverse events within 90 days following spine surgery (seven studies, pooled RR 1.13, 95% CI [.75-1.71], I2 = 41%). However, smoking was significantly associated with one or more major adverse events in ≤2 level fusion (three studies, pooled RR 2.46, 95% CI [1.18-5.12], I2 = 0%), but not in fusions of ≥3 levels (four studies, pooled RR .87, 95% CI [.70-1.08], I2 = 0%). Additionally, there was no statistically significant association between smoking and any adverse event, nor increased reoperation risk due to adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

In this meta-analysis, tobacco use was not associated with a statistically significant increased risk of adverse events within 90 days in patients undergoing spinal fusion surgery. Our results are limited by the variable reporting methodology for both complication rates as well as smoking incidence between the included individual studies.

Preventing and managing complications in dermatologic surgery: Procedural and postsurgical concerns

The second article in this continuing medical education series reviews the evidence regarding the intraoperative and postoperative risks for patients and health care workers. We share the most up-to-date recommendations for risk management and postoperative complication management to ensure optimal surgical efficacy and patient safety.

Incidence, Risk Factors, and Clinical Implications of Postoperative Hematoma Requiring Reoperation Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective study of prospectively collected data.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence, timing, risk factors, and clinical implications of postoperative hematoma requiring reoperation after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Postoperative hematomas requiring reoperation are rare but potentially catastrophic complications after ACDF. However, there has been a lack of large cohort studies investigating these complications in the ACDF population despite increasing outpatient procedure volume.

METHODS

Patients who underwent ACDF in the 2012 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database were identified. The primary outcome was an occurrence of hematoma requiring reoperation within 30 days postoperatively. Risk factors for this outcome were identified using multivariate regression. Postoperative length of stay, subsequent complications, and mortality were compared between patients who did and did not develop a hematoma requiring reoperation.

RESULTS

A total of 37,261 ACDF patients were identified, of which 148 (0.40%) developed a hematoma requiring reoperation (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.33%-0.46%). Of the cases that developed this complication, 37% occurred after discharge. Risk factors for the development of hematoma requiring reoperation were multilevel procedures (most notably ≥3 levels, relative risk [RR] = 3.14, 95% CI = 1.86-5.32, P < 0.001), preoperative international normalized ratio >1.2 (RR = 2.85, 95% CI = 1.42-5.71, P = 0.006), lower BMI (notably body mass index ≤24, RR = 2.11, 95% CI = 1.21-3.67, P = 0.008), American Society of Anesthesiologists classification ≥3 (RR = 2.07, 95% CI = 1.47-2.91, P < 0.001), preoperative anemia (RR = 1.71, 95% CI = 1.12-2.63, P = 0.027), and male sex (RR = 1.67, 95% CI = 1.18-2.37, P = 0.004). In addition, patients who developed a hematoma requiring reoperation before discharge had a longer length of stay. Further, those who developed a hematoma requiring reoperation were at higher risk for subsequent ventilator requirement, deep wound infection, pneumonia, and reintubation.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative hematoma requiring reoperation occurred in approximately 1 in 250 patients after ACDF. High-risk patients should be closely monitored through the perioperative period.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Missing data treatments matter: an analysis of multiple imputation for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

The presence of missing data is a limitation of large datasets, including the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP). In addressing this issue, most studies use complete case analysis, which excludes cases with missing data, thus potentially introducing selection bias. Multiple imputation, a statistically rigorous approach that approximates missing data and preserves sample size, may be an improvement over complete case analysis.

PURPOSE

The present study aims to evaluate the impact of using multiple imputation in comparison with complete case analysis for assessing the associations between preoperative laboratory values and adverse outcomes following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Patients undergoing one-level ACDF were identified in NSQIP 2012-2015.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Perioperative adverse outcome variables assessed included the occurrence of any adverse event, severe adverse events, and hospital readmission.

METHODS

Missing preoperative albumin and hematocrit values were handled using complete case analysis and multiple imputation. These preoperative laboratory levels were then tested for associations with 30-day postoperative outcomes using logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 11,999 patients were included. Of this cohort, 63.5% of patients had missing preoperative albumin and 9.9% had missing preoperative hematocrit. When using complete case analysis, only 4,311 patients were studied. The removed patients were significantly younger, healthier, of a common body mass index, and male. Logistic regression analysis failed to identify either preoperative hypoalbuminemia or preoperative anemia as significantly associated with adverse outcomes. When employing multiple imputation, all 11,999 patients were included. Preoperative hypoalbuminemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of any adverse event and severe adverse events. Preoperative anemia was significantly associated with the occurrence of any adverse event, severe adverse events, and hospital readmission.

CONCLUSIONS

Multiple imputation is a rigorous statistical procedure that is being increasingly used to address missing values in large datasets. Using this technique for ACDF avoided the loss of cases that may have affected the representativeness and power of the study and led to different results than complete case analysis. Multiple imputation should be considered for future spine studies.

The Role of the RN Circulator in a Navigated Posterior Spinal Fusion: 1.3 www.aornjournal.org/content/cme

The RN circulator plays a vital role in preparing for a minimally invasive spinal fusion with navigation by confirming that the necessary equipment and stakeholders are available and ensuring that the amount of equipment and the number of people in the room do not compromise patient safety or the sterility of the surgical field. Patients who undergo minimally invasive spinal fusion experience less blood loss, shorter hospital stays, and reduced costs than those who undergo open spinal fusion procedures. The overall successful fusion rates and improvement in patient quality of life are equivalent between the two approaches. Using navigation during minimally invasive and open spinal fusion procedures decreases radiation exposure to the patient and surgical team and helps ensure a more accurate placement of pedicle screws compared with nonnavigated minimally invasive or open spinal fusions.

Risk factors for predicting increased surgical drain output in patients after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion

Background

Although measures to reduce and treat the postoperative surgical drain output are discussed, along with the increased interest in causative factors related to the prevention and treatment reported by many studies, these are still controversial.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on a consecutive series of 217 patients who had underwent ACCF between January 2016 and March 2017. Patients were categorized based on normal or increased total drain output. These two groups were compared for demographic distribution and clinical data to investigate the predictive factors of increased drain output by multivariate analysis.

Results

The overall incidence rate of increased drain output after ACCF was 16.6%. There are no significant differences in sex, BMI, history of taking aspirin, and ASA classification between the two groups (P > 0.05). Of the patients with increased drain output, a significantly higher proportion of patients have OPLL in the surgical level, 18 (50.0%) versus 33 (18.2%) (P = 0.000). The mean age was 60.67 ± 8.18 years versus 54.41 ± 10.05 years (P = 0.001). Number of discs involved was 2.42 ± 0.50 versus 2.02 ± 0.65 (P = 0.001). Operation time was 112.22 ± 16.49 min versus 105.21 ± 17.89 min (P = 0.031). Intraoperative blood loss was 109.86 ± 62.02 mL versus 87.83 ± 56.40 mL (P = 0.036). Logistic regression analysis showed that age (OR, 1.075; p = 0.003), history of smoking (OR, 2.792; p = 0.021), OPLL in surgical level (OR, 2.107; p = 0.001), and number of discs involved (OR, 2.764; p = 0.003) maintained its significance in predicting likelihood of increased surgical drain output.

Conclusions

The occurrence of increased drain output after ACCF is most likely multifactorial and is related to age, history of smoking, OPLL in surgical level, and number of discs involved.