Clinical Outcomes of Outpatient Cervical Total Disc Replacement Compared With Outpatient Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion

Effect of device constraint: a comparative network meta-analysis of ACDF and cervical disc arthroplasty

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Clinical trials have demonstrated that cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) is an effective and safe alternative treatment to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical degenerative disc disease in the appropriately indicated patient population. Various devices for CDA exist, differing in the level of device constraint.

PURPOSE

To investigate outcomes following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) versus CDA stratified based on the level of device constraint: Constrained, Semiconstrained, and Unconstrained.

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

PATIENT SAMPLE

2,932 CDA patients (979 Constrained, 1,214 Semiconstrained, 739 Unconstrained) and 2,601 ACDF patients from 41 studies that compared outcomes of patients undergoing CDA or ACDF at a single level at a minimum of 2 years follow-up.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Outcomes of interest included the development of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), index and adjacent segment reoperation rates, range of motion (ROM), high-grade heterotopic ossification (HO, McAfee Grades 3/4), and patient-reported outcomes (NDI/VAS).

METHODS

CDA devices were grouped based on the degrees of freedom (DoF) allowed by the device, as either Constrained (3 DoF), Semiconstrained (4 or 5 DoF), or Unconstrained (6 DoF). A random effects network meta-analysis was conducted using standardized mean differences (SMD) and log relative risk (RR) were used to analyze continuous and categorical data, respectively.

RESULTS

Semiconstrained (p=.03) and Unconstrained CDA (p=.01) demonstrated a significantly lower risk for ASD than ACDF. All levels of CDA constraint demonstrated a significantly lower risk for subsequent adjacent segment surgery than ACDF (p<.001). Semiconstrained CDA also demonstrated a significantly lower risk for index level reoperation than both ACDF and Constrained CDA (p<.001). Unconstrained devices retained significantly greater ROM than both Constrained and Semiconstrained CDA (p<.001). As expected, all levels of device constraint retained significantly greater ROM than ACDF (p<.001). Constrained and Unconstrained devices both demonstrated significantly lower levels of disability on NDI than ACDF (p=.02). All levels of device constraint demonstrated significantly less neck pain than ACDF (p<.05), while Unconstrained CDA had significantly less arm pain than ACDF (p=.02) at final follow-up greater than 2 years.

CONCLUSION

Cervical Disc Arthroplasty, particularly the unconstrained and semiconstrained designs, appears to be more effective than ACDF in reducing the risk of adjacent segment degeneration and the need for further surgeries, while also allowing for greater range of motion and better patient-reported outcomes. Less constrained CDA conferred a lower risk for index level reoperation, while also retaining more range of motion than more constrained devices.

Multimodal analgesic protocol for cervical disc replacement in the ambulatory setting: Clinical case series

Background

Effective pain management is paramount for outpatient surgical success. This study aims to report a case series of patients undergoing cervical disc replacement (CDR) in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) with the use of an enhanced multimodal analgesic (MMA) protocol.

Methods

Primary, single-/2-level CDR procedures at an ASC with an enhanced MMA protocol were included. ASC patients were discharged day of surgery. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were administered at preoperative/6-week/12-week/6-month/1-year/2-year timepoints and included Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) neck, VAS arm, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System-Physical Function (PROMIS-PF), and 12-Item Short-Form Physical and Mental Composite Score (SF-12 PCS/SF-12 MCS). A t-test assessed postoperative PROM improvement from baseline. MCID achievement was determined by comparing ΔPROM scores to previously established thresholds.

Results

106 patients were included, 76 single-level and 30 2-level. Most single-levels occurred at C5-C6, most 2-levels at C5-C7. One 2-level patient developed a hematoma 5 days postoperatively and underwent revision for evacuation. Five patients reported postoperative dysphagia; all were quickly resolved. One patient had an episode of seizure secondary to serotonin syndrome from concealed drug use. Patient was reintubated, transferred, and treated for serotonin syndrome. Two patients experienced postoperative nausea/vomiting. Cohort significantly improved from baseline for all PROMS at all timepoints except SF-12 MCS at 1-year/2-years and SF-12 PCS at 2 years (p < 0.047, all). Overall MCID achievement rates were: VAS arm (48.7%), VAS neck (69.1%), NDI (98.9%), SF-12 MCS (50.0%), SF-12 PCS (54.6%), and PROMIS-PF (73.4%).

Conclusion

Outpatient CDR, incorporating an enhanced MMA protocol, can be safely and effectively performed with proper patient selection and surgical technique. Patients saw timely discharge, well-controlled postoperative pain, and favorable long-term outcomes.

Choose Wisely: Surgical Selection of Candidates for Outpatient Anterior Cervical Surgery Based on Early Complications Among Inpatients

BACKGROUND

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) and cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) are attractive targets for transition to the outpatient setting. We assessed the prevalence of rapid responses and major complications in the inpatient setting following 1 or 2-level ACDFs and CDAs. We evaluated factors that may place patients at greater risk for a rapid response or a postoperative complication.

METHODS

This was an institutional review board-approved, retrospective cohort study of adults undergoing 1 or 2-level ACDF or CDA at 1 hospital over a 2-year period (2018 and 2019). Data on patient demographic characteristics, surgical procedures, and comorbidities were collected. Rapid response events were identified by hospital floor staff and involved acute changes in a patient's clinical condition. Complications were events that were life-threatening, required an intervention, or led to delayed hospital discharge.

RESULTS

In this study, 1,040 patients were included: 888 underwent ACDF and 152 underwent CDA. Thirty-six patients (3.5%) experienced a rapid response event; 22% occurred >24 hours after extubation. Patients having a rapid response event had a significantly higher risk of developing a complication (risk ratio, 10; p < 0.01) and had a significantly longer hospital stay. Twenty-four patients (2.3%) experienced acute complications; 71% occurred >6 hours after extubation. Patients with a complication were older and more likely to be current or former smokers, have chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, have asthma, and have an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score of >2. The length of the surgical procedure was significantly longer in patients who developed a complication. All patients who developed dysphagia had a surgical procedure involving C4-C5 or more cephalad. Patients with a rapid response event or complication were more commonly undergoing revision surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

Rapid response and complications are uncommon following 1 or 2-level ACDFs or CDAs but portend a longer hospital stay and increased morbidity. Revision surgical procedures place patients at higher risk for rapid responses and complications. Additionally, older patients, patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or asthma, patients who are current or former smokers, and patients who have an ASA score of ≥3 are at increased risk for postoperative complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Discharge to Rehabilitation Predicts Increased Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare 30-day readmission and postdischarge morbidity for posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) in patients who were discharged to home versus rehabilitation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An increasing number of patients are being discharged to postacute inpatient care facilities following spine surgery. However, little research has been performed to evaluate the effect of this trend on short-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent PCDF from 2011 to 2018 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvements Program (NSQIP)-database. Regression was utilized to compare primary outcomes between home and rehabilitation groups and to control for predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 8912 patients. Unadjusted analysis revealed that rehabilitation-discharge patients had greater readmission (10.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.002) and postdischarge morbidity (7.1% vs. 4.0%, P<0.001) rates. After controlling for patient-related factors, rehabilitation-discharge independently predicted postdischarge morbidity (P<0.001, odds ratio=2.232). Readmission no longer differed between groups (P=0.071, odds ratio=1.311). Rates of discharge to rehabilitation increased from 23.5% in 2011 to 25.3% in 2018, while postdischarge morbidity rates remained stagnant.Patients discharged to rehabilitation were older (66.9 vs. 59.4 y); more likely to be African American (21.4% vs. 13.8%) and have diabetes (27.1% vs. 17.5%), steroid use (6.4% vs. 4.7%, P=0.002), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)-class ≥3 (80.2% vs. 57.7%); less likely to be male (53.9% vs. 57.4%, P=0.004) and smokers (20.3% vs. 26.6%); and had greater operative time (198 vs. 170 min) and length of hospital stay (5.9 vs. 3.3 d) (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite controlling for significant factors, discharge to rehabilitation independently predicted a 2.2 times increased odds of postdischarge morbidity. Rates of discharge to rehabilitation increased overtime without an appreciable decrease in postdischarge morbidity, suggesting that greater resources are being utilized in the postacute care period without an obvious justification. Therefore, home-discharge should be prioritized after hospitalization for PCDF when feasible. These findings are notable in light of reform efforts aimed at reducing costs while improving quality of care.

Spine Surgery Complications in the Ambulatory Surgical Center Setting: Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

This was a systematic review study.

PURPOSE

This study aims to review current literature to determine the rates of complications in relation to spine surgery in ambulatory surgery centers (ASC).

BACKGROUND

Recent improvements in anesthesia, surgical techniques, and technological advances have facilitated a rise in the use of ASC. Despite the benefits and lower costs associated with ASCs, there is inconsistent reporting of complication rates.

METHODS

This systematic review was completed utilizing the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA). Pertinent studies were identified through Embase and PubMed databases using the search string ((("ambulatory surgery center") AND "spine surgery") AND "complications"). Articles were excluded if they did not report outpatient surgery in an ASC, did not define complications, were in a language other than English, were non-human studies, or if the articles were classified as reviews, book chapters, single case reports, or small case series (≤10 patients). The primary outcome was the frequency of complications with respect to various categories.

RESULTS

Our query identified 150 articles. After filtering relevance by title, abstract, and full text, 22 articles were included. After accounting for 2 studies that were conducted on the same study sample, a total of 11,245 patients were analyzed in this study. The most recent study reported results from May 2019. While 5 studies did not list their surgical technique, studies reported techniques including open (6), minimally invasive surgery (2), endoscopic (4), microsurgery (1), and combined techniques (4). The following rates of complications were determined: cardiac 0.29% (3/1027), vascular 0.25% (18/7116), pulmonary 0.60% (11/1839), gastrointestinal 1.12% (2/179), musculoskeletal/spine/operative 0.59% (24/4053), urologic 0.80% (2/250), transient neurological 0.67% (31/4616), persistent neurological 0.61% (9/1479), pain related 0.57% (20/3479), and wound site 0.68% (28/4092).

CONCLUSIONS

After literature review, this is the first study to comprehensively analyze the current state of literature reporting on the complication profile of all ASC spine surgery procedures. The most common complications were gastrointestinal (1.12%) and the most infrequent were vascular (0.25%). Case reports varied significantly with regard to the type and rate of complications reported. This study provides complication profiles to assist surgeons in counseling patients on the most realistic expectations.

Cervical Total Disc Replacement: Novel Devices

This article reviews the available literature for novel cervical total disc replacement devices, including ones which are available inside and outside of the United States. It includes biomechanical consideration as well as design characteristics and clinical data when available.

Comparison of the Safety of Outpatient Cervical Disc Replacement With Inpatient Cervical Disc Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVES

Outpatient cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been performed with an increasing trend in recent years. However, the safety profile surrounding outpatient CDR remains insufficient. The present study systematically reviewed the current studies about outpatient CDR and performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the current evidence on the safety of outpatient CDR as a comparison with the inpatient CDR.

METHODS

We searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library databases comprehensively up to April 2020. Patient demographic data, overall complication, readmission, returning to the operation room, operating time were analyzed with the Stata 14 software and R 3.4.4 software.

RESULTS

Nine retrospective studies were included. Patients underwent outpatient CDR were significantly younger (mean difference [MD] = -1.97; 95% CI -3.80 to -0.15; P = .034) and had lower prevalence of hypertension (OR = 0.68; 95% CI 0.53-0.87; P = .002) compared with inpatient CDR. The pooled prevalence of overall complication was 0.51% (95% CI 0.10% to 1.13%) for outpatient CDR. Outpatient CDR had a 59% reduction in risk of developing complications (OR = 0.41; 95% CI 0.18-0.95; P = .037). Outpatient CDR showed significantly shorter operating time (MD = -18.37; 95% CI -25.96 to -10.77; P < .001). The readmission and reoperation rate were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of prospective studies on the safety of outpatient CDR. However, current evidence shows outpatient CDR can be safely performed under careful patient selection. High-quality, large prospective studies are needed to demonstrate the generalizability of this study.

Surgical Start Time Impact on Hospital Length of Stay for Elective Inpatient Procedures

Background

Hospital length of stay (LOS) remains an important, albeit nonspecific, metric in the analysis of surgical services. Modifiable factors to reduce LOS are few in number and the ability to practically take action is limited. Surgical scheduling of elective cases remains an important task in optimizing workflow and may impact the post-surgical LOS.

Methods

Retrospective data from a single tertiary care academic institution were analyzed from elective adult surgical cases performed from 2017 through 2019. Emergent or urgent add-on cases were excluded. Variables included primary procedure, age, diabetes status, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) class, and surgical start time. Analysis of the median LOS following surgery was performed using Mann-Whitney tests and Cox hazards model. Matched-cohort analysis of mean total hospitalization costs was performed using the Student’s t-test. 

Results

9,258 patients were analyzed across five surgical service lines, of which 777 patients had surgical start time after 3 PM. The median LOS for the after 3 PM group was 1 day longer than the before 3 PM start time cohort (3.0 vs 2.1, p < 0.001). Service line analysis revealed increased LOS for Orthopedics and Neurosurgery (3.0 vs 1.9, p < 0.001; 3.0 vs 2.0, p < 0.05). Multivariate analysis confirmed that start time before 3 PM predicted shorter LOS (HR = 1.214, 1.126-1.309; p < 0.001). Case-matched cost analysis for frequently performed orthopedic and neurosurgical cases with an after 3 PM start time failed to demonstrate a significant difference in total hospital charges. 

Conclusion

Optimization of surgical services scheduling to increase the proportion of elective surgical cases started before 3 PM has the potential to decrease post-surgical LOS for adult patients undergoing Orthopedic or Neurosurgical procedures. 

Comparative Analysis of 30-Day Readmission, Reoperation, and Morbidity Between Lumbar Disc Arthroplasty Performed in the Inpatient and Outpatient Settings Utilizing the ACS-NSQIP Dataset

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

Spine surgery has been increasingly performed in the outpatient setting, providing greater control over cost, efficiency, and resource utilization. However, research evaluating the safety of this trend is limited. The objective of this study is to compare 30-day readmission, reoperation, and morbidity for patients undergoing lumbar disc arthroplasty (LDA) in the inpatient versus outpatient settings.

METHODS

Patients who underwent LDA from 2005 to 2018 were identified using the ACS-NSQIP (American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program) database. Regression was utilized to compare readmission, reoperation, and morbidity between surgical settings, and to evaluate for predictors thereof.

RESULTS

We identified 751 patients. There were no significant differences between inpatient and outpatient LDA in rates of readmission, reoperation, or morbidity on univariate or multivariate analyses. There were also no significant differences in rates of specific complications. Inpatient operative time (138 ± 75 minutes) was significantly (P < .001) longer than outpatient operative time (106 ± 43 minutes). In multivariate analysis, diabetes (P < .001, OR = 7.365), baseline dyspnea (P = .039, OR = 6.447), and increased platelet count (P = .048, OR = 1.007) predicted readmission. Diabetes (P = .016, OR = 6.533) and baseline dyspnea (P = .046, OR = 13.814) predicted reoperation. Baseline dyspnea (P = .021, OR = 8.188) and ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) class ≥3 (P = .014, OR = 3.515) predicted morbidity. Decreased hematocrit (P = .008) and increased operative time (P = .003) were associated with morbidity in univariate analysis, but not in multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Readmission, reoperation, and morbidity were statistically similar between surgical setting, indicating that LDA can be safely performed in the outpatient setting. Higher ASA class and specific comorbidities predicted poorer 30-day outcomes. These findings can guide choice of surgical setting given specific patient factors.

Determining the Difference in Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes Between Expandable and Nonexpandable Titanium Cages in Cervical Fusion Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Expandable cages have been increasingly used in cervical and lumbar reconstructions; however, there is a paucity in the literature on how they compare with traditional nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine. We present a systematic review and meta-analysis, comparing the clinical and radiologic outcomes of expandable versus nonexpandable corpectomy cage use in the cervical spine.

METHODS

A database search identified studies detailing the outcomes of expandable and nonexpandable titanium cage use in the cervical spine. These studies were screened using the PRISMA protocol. Fixed-effects and random-effects models were used with a 95% confidence interval. Two analyses were carried out for each outcome: one including all studies and the other including only studies reporting on exclusively 1-level and 2-level cases.

RESULTS

Forty-one studies were included. The mean change in segmental lordosis was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 6.72 vs. 3.69°, P < 0.001; 1-level and 2-level, 6.81° vs. 4.31°, P < 0.001). The mean change in cervical lordosis was also significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 5.71° vs. 3.11°, P = 0.027; 1-level and 2-level, 5.71° vs. 2.07°, P = 0.002). No significant difference was found between the complication rates (all, P = 0.43; 1-level and 2-level, P = 0.94); however, the proportion of revisions was significantly greater in expandable cages (all, 0.06 vs. 0.02, P = 0.03; 1-level and 2-level, 0.08 vs. 0.01, P = 0.017).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of expandable cages may carry a modest improvement in radiologic outcomes compared with nonexpandable cages in the cervical spine; however, they may also lead to a higher rate of revisions based on our analyses.

Greater than 5-year follow-up of outpatient L4-L5 lumbar interspinous fixation for degenerative spinal stenosis using the INSPAN device

Background

Lumbar spinal stenosis is treated with decompression directly such as laminectomies and indirectly with an interspinous device through distraction and extension block. Interspinous devices (IPD) have also been used as an adjunct to spinal fusion. However, the design for IPD to treat spinal stenosis does not fixate the spine while the design for spinal fusion is designed to fixate the spine. There is a paucity of data on a single device that has been used for both fusion and stenosis. Authors aim to demonstrate the long-term outcomes of interspinous fixation at L4-5 for degenerative spinal stenosis.

Methods

We evaluated patients with spinal stenosis and degenerative disc disease who were treated with open decompression and distraction of the spinous processes at L4-L5 using an interspinous device. All patients complained of lower back pain and neurogenic claudication. This is a retrospective review of prospectively collected data (level 3) under an IRB approved study cohort. The charts of patient undergoing lumbar decompression with Interspinous Distraction, Fixation using InSpan device (INSPAN LLC) in an outpatient setting were reviewed with over a 5-year follow-up period.

Results

122 surgical cases of lumbar decompression with interspinous fixation, spanning between the timeframe of September 2011 to October 2016. A total of 56 patients had instrumentation at L4-L5. Total female population was 46%. The median age of the patients included in the population was 50.9±10.7 years with a median BMI of 24.8±11.4 kg/m². Two-year VAS and ODI showed significant improvement from 8.1±1.2 to 1.5±1.1 and 42.9±14.3 to 14.8±5.1. All surgeries were completed in less than one hour. There was a total of 1 revision case with removal of INSPAN and open hemilaminectomy decompression.

Conclusions

Long term results demonstrated improved outcomes in patients who underwent Interspinous distraction decompression in an ambulatory surgery center using the INSPAN IPD at L4-L5 for Degenerative Spinal Stenosis. There was one revision converted to hemilaminectomy. There were no complications or blood transfusions.

Low Complication Rate of Anterior Lumbar Spine Surgery in an Ambulatory Surgery Center

BACKGROUND

As healthcare costs rise, attempts are being made to perform an increasing proportion of spine surgery in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). ASCs are more efficient, both economically and functionally. There remains uncertainty regarding the safety of performing anterior lumbar procedures requiring vascular access, as little has been published on this subset of patients.

METHODS

This is a consecutive case series analysis of anterior lumbar spine surgeries that were performed in a free-standing ASC in a private-practice setting over a 1-year period, including anterior lumbar interbody fusion, artificial disc replacement, and hybrid procedures. The preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data recorded included age, gender, body mass index, tobacco use, and the presence of diabetes; level and procedure, operating room time, estimated blood loss, complications; discharge site, occurrence of reoperation, hospital admission, or any medical complication or infection over a 90-day period.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients underwent 63 treated levels (34 artificial disc replacement, 29 anterior lumbar interbody fusion): 40 single-level, 10 two-level, one three-level. Average age was 45 years; 27 female, 24 males. None of the patients were diabetics, three were current smokers, seven were former smokers. Average body mass index was 27 ± 4 (range 16-36). Average total anesthesia time was 100 minutes (range 57-187 minutes). Average estimated blood loss was 23 mL (range 5-250 mL). Seventy-one percent of patients were discharged directly home, 29% to an aftercare facility. In the 30-day postoperative period there were no deaths, one hospital admission for pain, and no significant medical complications or surgical site infections.

CONCLUSION

In this consecutive case series artificial disc replacement or anterior lumbar interbody fusion was performed at 63 levels in 51 patients in the ASC setting with an observed major complication rate of zero and hospital unplanned admission rate of 2% (1/51). This provides some evidence that these procedures are safe to perform in the ASC setting. However, a highly experienced vascular surgeon and efficient surgical team, and strict patient selection criteria are all critical in making this possible.

Experience of using a 3-blade LES-Tri retractor over 5 years for lumbar decompression microdiscectomy

BACKGROUND

Lower back pain is the fifth most common reason for visiting a physician in the United States. Degenerative disc disease, degenerative spondylolisthesis, arthritis, and facet arthrosis are leading causes for lumbar spinal stenosis. The previous gold standard involved open laminectomy combined with medial facetectomy and foraminotomy. The advent of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and endoscopic technologies has led to less invasive and targeted interventions. In this study, the authors aim to show a five-year experience using a three-blade retractor for lumbar decompression and microdiscectomy.

METHODS

A database review of a single spine surgeon over the last 5 years with a total of 306 patients undergoing single-level lumbar decompression with and without microdiscectomy.

RESULTS

The average age was 47 ± 12 years and the average BMI was 29.7 ± 5.7 kg/m2 with a total of 52% male patients. Operative levels included L3-4, L4-L5, and L5-S1, with 65% of procedures at the L5-S1 level and follow-up was for two years. Overall mean VAS back scores decreased from 7.9 ± 1.6 to 2.5 ± 1.1 at two-year follow-up, p = 0.001. Preoperative ODI scores improved from 32.1 ± 5.1 to 17.9 ± 4.3 at two-year follow-up, p = 0.002. The mean EBL and surgeon time was 21 ± 15 ml and 35 ± 17 min, respectively.

CONCLUSION

This less exposure surgery technique can be performed to allow lumbar decompression, with or without microdiscectomy. This is an anatomy preserving technique with improved outcomes.

Comparison of the safety of outpatient cervical disc replacement with inpatient cervical disc replacement: A protocol for a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has been widely used as an effective treatment for cervical degenerative disc diseases in recent years. However, the cost of this procedure is very high and may bring a great economic burden to patients and the health care system. It is reported that outpatient procedures can reduce nearly 30% of the costs associated with hospitalization compared with inpatient procedures. However, the safety profile surrounding outpatient CDR remains poorly resolved. This study aims to evaluate the current evidence on the safety of outpatient CDR METHODS:: Four English databases were searched. The inclusion and exclusion criteria were developed according to the PICOS principle. The titles and abstracts of the records will be screened by 2 authors independently. Records that meet the eligibility criteria will be screened for a second time by reading the full text. An extraction form will be established for data extraction. Risk of bias assessment will be performed by 2 authors independently using Cochrane risk of bias tool or Newcastle-Ottawa scale. Data synthesis will be conducted using Stata software. Heterogeneity among studies will be assessed using I test. The funnel plot, Egger regression test, and Begg rank correlation test will be used to examine the publication bias.

RESULTS

The results of this meta-analysis will be published in a peer-review journal.

CONCLUSION

This will be the first meta-analysis that compares the safety of outpatient CDR with inpatient CDR. Our study will help surgeons fully understand the complications and safety profile surrounding outpatient CDR. OSF REGISTRATION NUMBER:: doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/3597Z.

Outcomes following outpatient anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the treatment of myelopathy

INTRODUCTION

Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is a commonly performed procedure for the treatment of degenerative cervical disease. With continued increase in U.S. healthcare expenditure, surgeons have begun to more closely examine the benefits of performing ACDF in an outpatient setting to increase efficiency, reduce the overall financial burden on patients/providers, and provide streamlined care for these patients. The purpose of this study was to analyze outcomes following outpatient ACDF for the treatment of myelopathy.

METHODS

14,490 patients who had undergone ACDF for myelopathy from 2010 to 2018 were included in this retrospective study, of which 2956 (20.40%) patients were considered to have undergone outpatient surgery. Pearson chi-squared tests and Fischer's Exact Tests were used to analyze differences in categorical variables of demographics, preoperative comorbidities, and postoperative complications, while Mann-Whitney-U-Tests were used to compare mean values of continuous variables. Coarsened-exact-matching (CEM) was implemented to control for baseline differences in demographics and comorbidities, and post-matching diagnostics included multivariate and univariate imbalance measure assessment. Outcomes were compared between the CEM-matched inpatient and outpatients ACDF cohorts.

RESULTS

Upon CEM-matching (L1-statistic <0.001), the outpatient cohort (n = 2610, 25.13%) demonstrated significantly lower rates of any complication (p < 0.001), minor complications (p = 0.001), urinary tract infections (p = 0.029), blood transfusions (p < 0.001), major complications (p < 0.001), deep incisional surgical site infections (p = 0.017), ventilator dependence (p = 0.027), cardiac arrest (p = 0.028), unplanned reoperations (p = 0.001), and mortality (p = 0.006) in the 30-day postoperative period when compared to inpatient controls (n = 7774, 74.87%).

CONCLUSION

ACDF has been a target amongst spinal procedures as a prime candidate for outpatient surgery. However, no previous reports have described complication rates and perioperative parameters in the sub-population of outpatient ACDF patients with myelopathy. In addition to shorter times from admission to operating room, operative time, and LOS, our study also demonstrated lower rates of major and overall complications in outpatient ACDF's for myelopathy in comparison to their inpatient counterparts. Performing ACDF's for myelopathy in an outpatient setting may help to curb costs, improve outcomes, and serve as a valuable learning resource for graduate medical education with rapid turnovers and shorter operative times.

The Safety of Single and Multilevel Cervical Total Disc Replacement in Ambulatory Surgery Centers

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the safety profile of single- and multilevel cervical artificial disc replacement (ADR) performed in an outpatient setting.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As healthcare costs rise, attempts are made to perform an increasing proportion of spine surgery in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). ASCs are more efficient, economically and functionally. Few studies have published on the safety profile of multilevel cervical ADR.

METHODS

We have performed an analysis of all consecutive cervical ADR surgeries that we performed in an ASC over a 9-month period, including multilevel and revision surgery. The pre-, intra-, and postoperative data recorded included age, sex, body mass index, tobacco use, and diabetes; level and procedure, operating room time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and complications; and discharge site, occurrence of reoperation, hospital admission, or any medical complication or infection over a 90-day period.

RESULTS

A total of 147 patients underwent 231 treated levels: 71 single-level, 76 multilevel: 69 two-level, 6 three-level, and 1 four-level. Average age was 50 ± 10 years; 71 women, 76 men. None of the patients had insulin-dependent diabetes, 4 were current smokers, and 16 were former smokers. Average body mass index was 26.8 ± 4.6 (range 18-40). Average total anesthesia time was 88 minutes (range 39-168 min). Average EBL was 15 mL (range 5-100 mL). Approximately 90.3% of patients were discharged directly home, 9.7% to an aftercare facility. In the 90-day postoperative period there were zero deaths and two hospital admissions (1.4%)-one for medical complication (0.7%) and one for a surgical site infection (0.7%).

CONCLUSION

In this consecutive case series we performed 231 ADRs in 147 patients in the outpatient setting, including multilevel and revision procedures, with 2 minor postoperative complications resulting in hospital unplanned admissions within 90 days. We believe that these procedures are safe to perform in an ASC. An efficient surgical team and careful patient selection criteria are critical in making this possible.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Complications of anterior cervical spine surgery: a systematic review of the literature

The anterior approach to the cervical spine is commonly utilized for a variety of degenerative, traumatic, neoplastic, and infectious indications. While many potential complications overlap with those of the posterior approach, the distinct anatomy of the anterior neck also presents a unique set of hazards. We performed a systematic review of the literature to assess the etiology, presentation, natural history, and management of these complications. Following the guidelines of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA), a PubMed search was conducted to evaluate clinical studies and case reports of patients who suffered a complication of anterior cervical spine surgery. The search specifically included articles concerning adult human subjects, written in the English language, and published from 1989 to 2019. The PubMed search yielded 240 articles meeting our criteria. The overall rates of complications were as follows: dysphagia 5.3%, esophageal perforation 0.2%, recurrent laryngeal nerve palsy 1.3%, infection 1.2%, adjacent segment disease 8.1%, pseudarthrosis 2.0%, graft or hardware failure 2.1%, cerebrospinal fluid leak 0.5%, hematoma 1.0%, Horner syndrome 0.4%, C5 palsy 3.0%, vertebral artery injury 0.4%, and new or worsening neurological deficit 0.5%. Morbidity rates in anterior cervical spine surgery are low. Nevertheless, the unique anatomy of the anterior neck presents a wide variety of potential complications involving vascular, aerodigestive, neural, and osseous structures.

Application of a modified surgical position in anterior approach for total cervical artificial disc replacement

BACKGROUND

Total cervical artificial disc replacement (TDR) has been considered a safe and effective alternative surgical treatment for cervical spondylosis and degenerative disc disease that have failed to improve with conservative methods. Positioning the surgical patient is a critical part of the procedure. Appropriate patient positioning is crucial not only for the safety of the patient but also for optimizing surgical exposure, ensuring adequate and safe anesthesia, and allowing the surgeon to operate comfortably during lengthy procedures. The surgical posture is the traditional position used in anterior cervical approach; in general, patients are in a supine position with a pad under their shoulders and a ring-shaped pillow under their head.

AIM

To investigate the clinical outcomes of the use of a modified surgical position versus the traditional surgical position in anterior approach for TDR.

METHODS

In the modified position group, the patients had a soft pillow under their neck, and their jaw and both shoulders were fixed with wide tape. The analyzed data included intraoperative blood loss, position setting time, total operation time, and perioperative blood pressure and heart rate.

RESULTS

Blood pressure and heart rate were not significantly different before and after body positioning in both groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the traditional position group, the modified position group showed a statistically significantly longer position setting time (P < 0.05). However, the total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were significantly reduced in the modified position group compared with the traditional position group (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

The clinical outcomes indicated that total operation time and intraoperative blood loss were relatively lower in the modified position group than in the traditional position group, thus reducing the risks of surgery while increasing the position setting time. The modified surgical position is a safe and effective method to be used in anterior approach for TDR surgery.

Incidence of Fusion Across Total Disc Replacement With Heterotopic Ossification: Are Ball and Socket Disk Replacements Fusing With and Without Radiographic Evidence

STUDY DESIGN

This is a level III retrospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The authors aim to review the outcomes and complications of ball and socket total disk replacements (TDRs).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

TDR is a motion-preserving technique that closely reproduces physiologic kinematics of the cervical spine. However, heterotopic ossification and spontaneous fusion after implantation of the total cervical disk have been reported in several studies to decrease the range of motion postulated by in vitro and in vivo biomechanical studies.

METHODS

The medical records of 117 consecutive patients undergoing cervical TDR over a 5-year period with Mobi-C, Prodisc-C, Prestige LP, and Secure-C implants were followed. Outcomes assessed included Visual Analogue Scale neck and arm and Neck Disability Index scores. The radiographic assessment looked at heterotopic ossification leading to fusion and complication rates.

RESULTS

Of the 117 patients that underwent TDR, 56% were male with the group's mean age being 46.2±10.3 years and body mass index of 18.9±13.6 kg/m. The longest follow-up was 5 years with Prodisc-C group, with overall fusion noted in 16% of patients. One patient was also noted to have fusion which was not seen radiographically but noted intraoperatively for adjacent segment disease. There has been no demonstrable radiographic fusion seen in the Prestige LP group, however, the follow-up has only been 12-24 months for this group.

CONCLUSION

In this study, we have demonstrated radiographic fusion anterior to the ball and socket TDR as well as the uncovertebral joint. We postulate that with the use of a mobile core disk there is an increased potential for fusion leading to a nonfunctional disk replacement.

Complication avoidance and management in ambulatory spine surgery

The positive safety profile and potential cost savings associated with ambulatory spine surgery have resulted in an increasing number of spine procedures being performed on an outpatient basis. As indications become more inclusive and the variety and volume of ambulatory procedures grow, the incidence of complications may rise. Limiting adverse events in the outpatient setting starts with patient selection. Surgeons should be aware of the potential complications and associated risk factors for common ambulatory spine procedures and employ strategies to limit and appropriately manage them. Protocols which include patient education, multimodal anesthesia and analgesia, standardized post-operative monitoring, and safe discharge planning are also essential for maximizing safety in the ambulatory setting.

Artificial Discs in Cervical Disc Replacement: A Meta-Analysis for Comparison of Long-Term Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Cervical disc replacement (CDR) has emerged as an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for the surgical treatment of degenerative cervical disc disease. Although comparison of the 2 techniques has been studied in the literature, a thorough assessment of all artificial discs between each has not been performed. The objective of the present study was to examine the long-term outcomes of 5 artificial discs.

METHODS

An electronic literature search was conducted for studies of CDR devices for all years available. Only articles in English were included. Heterotopic ossification, adjacent segment disease, and reoperation comprised the primary outcomes of interest. Pooled descriptive statistics with effect size (ES) and 95% confidence interval were used to synthesize the outcomes for each device.

RESULTS

Sixty-five studies (n = 5785) were included in the analysis. Comparison of the incidence of grade III/IV heterotopic ossification showed a significant variability between the 5 devices (P < 0.001) with ProDisc-C (ES, 38%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 24%-54%) having the highest incidence rate. Overall rate of adjacent segment disease was 14% (95% CI, 7%-23%) with significant associated heterogeneity (P < 0.001). Regarding 2-year reoperation risk, the overall incidence rate was 2% (95% CI, 1%-3%), with nonsignificant variability between devices (P = 0.63). The highest rate was observed in the Discover group (ES, 4%; 95% CI, 0%-13%).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present meta-analysis indicate that surgical and clinical outcomes may differ among different CDR devices. These findings may assist surgeons in tailoring their decision making to specific patient profiles. Future multicenter efforts are needed to validate associations found in this study.

Analysis of Outcomes and Cost of Inpatient and Ambulatory Anterior Cervical Disk Replacement Using a State-level Database

BACKGROUND

Outpatient cervical artificial disk replacement (ADR) is a promising candidate for cost reduction. Several studies have demonstrated low overall complications and minimal readmission in anterior cervical procedures.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to compare clinical outcomes and cost associated between inpatient and ambulatory setting ADR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Outcomes and cost were retrospectively analyzed for patients undergoing elective ADR in California, Florida, and New York from 2009 to 2011 in State Inpatient and Ambulatory Databases.

RESULTS

A total of 1789 index ADR procedures were identified in the inpatient database (State Inpatient Databases) compared with 370 procedures in the ambulatory cohort (State Ambulatory Surgery and Services Databases). Ambulatory patients presented to the emergency department 19 times (5.14%) within 30 days of the index procedure compared with 4.2% of inpatients. Four unique patients underwent readmission within 30 days in the ambulatory ADR cohort (1% total) compared with 2.2% in the inpatient ADR group. No ambulatory ADR patients underwent a reoperation within 30 days. Of the inpatient ADR group, 6 unique patients underwent reoperation within 30 days (0.34%, Charlson Comorbidity Index zero=0.28%, Charlson Comorbidity Index>0=0.6%). There was no significant difference in emergency department visit rate, inpatient readmission rate, or reoperation rates within 30 days of the index procedure between outpatient or inpatient ADR. Outpatient ADR is noninferior to inpatient ADR in all clinical outcomes. The direct cost was significantly lower in the outpatient ADR group ($11,059 vs. 17,033; P<0.001). The 90-day cumulative charges were significantly lower in the outpatient ADR group (mean $46,404.03 vs. $80,055; P<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

ADR can be performed in an ambulatory setting with comparable morbidity, readmission rates, and lower costs, to inpatient ADR.

Current trends in ambulatory spine surgery: a systematic review

Spine surgery continues to move into the ambulatory setting in an effort to pair high-quality care delivery with low-cost facilities. The purpose of this review was to assess the current literature for trends in the practice of ambulatory spine surgery. A systematic review of the English language literature from the past five years was performed utilizing PRISMA standards. The results demonstrate that current focus of research emphasizes the safety of ambulatory surgery-with several studies commenting on complication rates, patient selection, and postoperative protocols to prevent readmissions or complications. Research is also focused on quality of care, and ensuring non-inferiority of ambulatory surgery when compared with traditional inpatient hospitalizations. Importantly, no level I or II literature has been published on the topic in the past five years, suggesting a renewed need for high quality prospective studies.

Future endeavors in ambulatory spine surgery

Due to the high societal and financial burden of spinal disorders, spine surgery is thought to be one of the most impactful targets for healthcare cost reduction. One avenue for cost-reduction that is increasingly being explored not just in spine surgery but across specialties is the performance of surgeries in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). Despite potential cost-savings, the utilization of ASCs for spine surgery remains largely limited to high-volume centers in the US, and predominantly for single- or two-level lumbar microdiscectomy and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures. Factors most commonly cited for the lack of wider adoption include the risk of life-threatening complications, paucity of guidelines, and limited accessibility of these procedures to various patient populations. Thus, the future growth and adoption of ambulatory spine surgery depends on addressing these concerns by developing evidence-based guidelines for patient- and procedure selection, creating risk-stratification tools, devising appropriate discharge recommendations, and optimizing care protocols to ensure that safety, efficacy and outcomes are maintained. Other avenues that may allow for more widespread use of ASCs include the use of electronic health tools for post-operative monitoring after discharge from the ASC, increasing accessibility of ambulatory procedures to eligible populations, and identifying systemic inefficiencies and implementing process-improvement measures to optimize patient-selection, scheduling and peri-operative management. The success of ambulatory surgery ultimately depends not only on the surgical procedure, but also on its organization upstream and downstream. It provides an exciting and burgeoning avenue for innovation, cost-reduction and value-creation.

Safety of Outpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Propensity-Matched Multi-institutional Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort comparison study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the perioperative adverse event profile of cervical total disc replacement (CTDR) performed as an outpatient relative to inpatient procedure.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Recent reimbursement changes and a push for safe reductions in hospital stay have resulted in increased interest in performing CTDRs in the outpatient setting. However, there has been a paucity of studies investigating the safety of outpatient CTDR procedures, despite increasing frequency.

METHODS

Patients who underwent single-level CTDR were identified in the 2005 to 2016 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Outpatient versus inpatient procedure status was defined by length of stay, with outpatient being less than 1 day. Patient baseline characteristics and comorbidities were compared between the two groups. Propensity score matched comparisons were then performed for 30-day perioperative complications and readmissions between the two cohorts. In addition, perioperative outcomes of outpatient single-level CTDR versus matched outpatient single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) cases were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 373 outpatient and 1612 inpatient single-level CTDR procedures were identified. After propensity score matching was performed to control for potential confounders, statistical analysis revealed no significant difference in perioperative complications between outpatient versus matched inpatient CTDR. Notably, the rate of readmissions was not different between the two groups. In addition, there was no difference in rates of perioperative adverse events between outpatient single-level CTDR versus matched outpatient single-level ACDF.

CONCLUSION

The perioperative outcomes evaluated in the current study support the conclusion that, for appropriately selected patients, single-level CTDR can be safely performed in the outpatient setting without increased rates of 30-day perioperative complications or readmissions compared with inpatient CTDR or outpatient single-level ACDF.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Decreasing radiation dose with FluoroLESS Standalone Anterior Cervical Fusion

Background

Radiation dose continues to be a concern especially in the field of spine surgery, where anterior and posterior instrumentation is frequently utilized to treat multiple pathologies. The authors aim to demonstrate the feasibility of decreasing the radiation dose in standalone anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Methods

Standalone ACDF (S-ACDF) with 48 consecutive patients (Group 1) with a comparison control group with ACDF with an anterior cervical plate (ACP) of 49 patients (Group 2). Fluoroscopy was performed for positioning, identification of level, placement of the implant, each screw, final AP and lateral images for the first 20 patients in Group 1. Screw placement could then be performed confidently based on cosine rule of cosine (Ѳ) = adj/hyp.

Results

Forty-eight patients in Group 1 (S-ACDF) and 49 patients in Group 2 (ACDF-ACP). Statistical significance not demonstrated for age, BMI or gender, P=0.691, 0.947 and 0.286 respectively. Mean radiation dose in group 1 of 17.9±6.6 mAs and 0.8±0.3 mSv was significantly less compared to group 2 which was 29.8±5.4 and 1.3±0.2 mSv, P<0.001. The average radiation dose for single-level fusion in Group 1 was 12.5±3.5 mAs and 0.5±0.1 mSv this is compared to Group 2 of 27.8±3.9 mAs and 1.2±0.2 mSv, P=0.001. The average radiation dose for two level fusion in Group 1 was 22.2±5.1 mAs and 0.9±0.2 mSv this is compared to Group 2 of 33.9±6.0 and 1.4±0.3 mSv, P=0.001.

Conclusions

In the outpatient setting, S-ACDF has shown a statistically significant intergroup difference in overall radiation dose, as well as single and two-level fusions, (P<0.001). We conclude that S-ACDF can decrease overall radiation exposure to patients.

Outpatient and Inpatient Single-level Cervical Total Disc Replacement: A Comparison of 30-day Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to compare 30-day postoperative outcomes between patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient single-level cervical total disc replacement (TDR) surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical TDR is a motion-sparing treatment for cervical radiculopathy and myelopathy. It is an alternative to anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with a similar complication rate. Like ACDF, it may be performed in the inpatient or outpatient setting. Efforts to reduce health care costs are driving spine surgery to be performed in the outpatient setting. As cervical TDR surgery continues to gain popularity, the safety of treating patients on an outpatient basis needs to be validated.

METHODS

The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was queried for patients who underwent single-level cervical disc replacement surgery between 2006 and 2015. Complication data including 30-day complications, reoperation rate, readmission rate, and length of stay data were compared between the inpatient and outpatient cohort using univariate analysis.

RESULTS

There were 531 (34.2%) patients treated as outpatients and 1022 (65.8%) were treated on an inpatient basis. The two groups had similar baseline characteristics. The overall 30-day complication rate was 1.4% for inpatients and 0.6% for outpatients. Reoperation rate was 0.6% for inpatient and 0.4% for outpatients. Readmission rate was 0.9% and 0.8% for inpatient and outpatient, respectively. There were no statistical differences identified in rates of readmission, reoperation, or complication between the inpatient and outpatient cohorts.

CONCLUSION

There was no difference between 30-day complications, readmission, and reoperation rates between inpatients and outpatients who underwent a single-level cervical TDR. Furthermore, the overall 30-day complication rates were low. This study supports that single-level cervical TDR can be performed safely in an outpatient setting.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Outpatient Posterior Lumbar Fusion: A Population-Based Analysis of Trends and Complication Rates

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective case-control study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine the nationwide trends and complication rates associated with outpatient posterior lumbar fusion (PLF).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Outpatient lumbar spine fusion is now possible secondary to minimally invasive techniques that allow for reduced hospital stays and analgesic requirements. Limited data are currently available regarding the clinical outcome of outpatient lumbar fusion.

METHODS

The Humana administrative claims database was queried for patients who underwent one to two-level PLF (CPT-22612 or CPT-22633 AND ICD-9-816.2) as either outpatients or inpatients from Q1 2007 to Q2 2015. The incidence of perioperative medical and surgical complications was determined by querying for relevant International Classification of Diseases and Current Procedural Terminology codes. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to calculate odds ratios (ORs) of complications among outpatients relative to inpatients undergoing PLF.

RESULTS

Cohorts of 770 patients who underwent outpatient PLF and 26,826 patients who underwent inpatient PLF were identified. The median age was in the 65 to 69 years age group for both cohorts. The annual relative incidence of outpatient PLF remained stable across the study period (R = 0.03, P = 0.646). Adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities, patients undergoing outpatient PLF had higher likelihood of revision/extension of posterior fusion [(OR 2.33, confidence interval (CI) 2.06-2.63, P < 0.001], anterior fusion (OR 1.64, CI 1.31-2.04, P < 0.001), and decompressive laminectomy (OR 2.01, CI 1.74-2.33, P < 0.001) within 1 year. Risk-adjusted rates of all other postoperative surgical and medical complications were statistically comparable.

CONCLUSION

Outpatient lumbar fusion is uncommonly performed in the United States. Data collected from a national private insurance database demonstrate a greater risk of postoperative surgical complications including revision anterior and posterior fusion and decompressive laminectomy. Surgeons should be cautious in performing PLF in the outpatient setting, as the risk of revision surgery may increase in these cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Safety and Efficiency of Cervical Disc Arthroplasty in Ambulatory Surgery Centers vs. Hospital Settings

Background

Outpatient surgery has been shown safe and effective for anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and more recently, for 1-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). The purpose of this analysis is to compare the safety and efficiency of 1-level and 2-level CDA performed in an ambulatory surgery center (ASC) and in a hospital setting.

Methods

The study was a retrospective collection and analysis of data from consecutive CDA patients treated in ASCs compared to a historical control group of patients treated in hospital settings who were classified as outpatient (0 or 1-night stay) or inpatient (2 or more nights). Surgery time, blood loss, return to work, adverse events (AEs), and subsequent surgeries were compared.

Results

The sample consisted of 145 ASC patients, 348 hospital outpatients, and 65 hospital inpatients. A greater proportion of 2-level surgeries were performed in hospital than ASC. Surgery times were significantly shorter in ASCs than outpatient or inpatient 1-level (63.6 ± 21.6, 86.5 ± 35.8, and 116.7 ± 48.4 minutes, respectively) and 2-level (92.4 ± 37.3, 126.7 ± 43.8, and 140.3 ± 54.5 minutes, respectively) surgeries. Estimated blood loss was also significantly less in ASC than outpatient and inpatient 1-level (18.5 ± 30.6, 43.7 ± 35.9, and 85.7 ± 98.0 mL, respectively) and 2-level (21.1 ± 12.3, 67.8 ± 94.9, and 64.9 ± 66.1 mL). There were no hospital admissions and no subsequent surgeries among ASC patients. ASC patients had 1 AE (0.7%) and hospital patients had 10 AEs (2.4%). Working patients returned to work after a similar number of days off, but fewer ASC patients had returned to work by the end of the 90-day period.

Conclusions

Both 1- and 2-level CDA may be performed safely in an ASC. Surgeries in ASCs are of shorter duration and performed with less blood loss without increased AEs.

Comparison of Inpatient and Outpatient Preoperative Factors and Postoperative Outcomes in 2-Level Cervical Disc Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate factors associated with inpatient admission following 2-level cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA). A secondary aim was to compare outcomes between those treated on an inpatient versus outpatient basis.

METHODS

Using data from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to assess the independent effect of each variable on inpatient or outpatient selection for surgery. Statistical significance was defined by p-values <0.05. The factors considered were age, sex, body mass index (BMI), smoking status, American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification, and comorbidities including hypertension, diabetes, history of dyspnea or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, previous cardiac intervention or surgery, steroid usage, and history of bleeding. In addition, whether the operation was performed by an orthopedic or neurosurgical specialist was analyzed.

RESULTS

The number of 2-level CDA procedures increased from 6 cases reported in 2014 to 142 in 2016, although a statistically significant increase in the number of outpatient cases performed was not seen (p=0.2). The factors found to be significantly associated with inpatient status following surgery were BMI (p=0.019) and diabetes mellitus requiring insulin (p=0.043). There were no significant differences in complication and readmission rates between the inpatient and outpatient groups.

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing inpatient 2-level CDA had significantly higher rates of obesity and diabetes requiring insulin than did patients undergoing the same procedure in the outpatient setting. With no difference in complication or readmission rates, 2-level CDA may be considered safe in the outpatient setting in appropriately selected patients.

Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy: A French study and literature review

INTRODUCTION

In France, surgery for lumbar disc herniation is now being done in the outpatient ambulatory setting at select facilities. However, surgery for the cervical spine in this setting is controversial because of the dangers of neck hematoma. We wanted to share our experience with performing ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy in 30 patients at our facility.

RESULTS

Since 2014, 30 patients (16 men, 14 women; mean age of 47.2 years) with cervical radiculopathy due to single-level cervical disc disease (19 at C5-C6 and 11 at C6-C7) were operated at our ambulatory surgery center. After anterior cervical discectomy, cervical disc replacement was performed in 13 patients and fusion in 17 patients. The mean operative time was 38minutes and the mean duration of postoperative monitoring was 7hours 30minutes. The patients stayed at the healthcare facility for an average of 10hours 10minutes. One female patient (3%) was transferred to a standard hospital unit due to a neurological deficit requiring surgical revision with no cause identified. Two patients (7%) were rehospitalized on Day 1 due to dysphagia that resolved spontaneously. Thus the "ambulatory success rate" was 90% (27/30). There were no other complications and the overall satisfaction rate was excellent (9.6/10).

DISCUSSION

Outpatient anterior cervical discectomy is now widely performed in the United States. Ours is the first study of French patients undergoing this procedure. The complication rate was very low (<2%) and even lower than patients treated in an inpatient hospital setting in comparative studies. Note that our patients were carefully selected for outpatient surgery as certain risk factors for complications have previously been identified (age, 3+levels, comorbidities/ASA>2). No deaths in the first 30 days postoperative have been reported in the literature. Wound hematoma leading to airway compromise is rare in the ambulatory setting (0.2%). The few cases that occurred were detected early and the hematoma drained before the patient was discharged. Dysphagia is actually the most common complication (8 to 30%).

CONCLUSION

Cervical spine surgery can be performed in an ambulatory surgery center in carefully selected patients. Our criteria are patients less than 65 years of age, single-level disease, ASA<2, and standard cervical morphology. The complication and readmission rates are low. Careful hemostasis combined with close postoperative monitoring for at least 6hours helps to reduce the risk of neck hematoma. Prevention of postoperative dysphagia must be a focus of the care provided.

Sentinel sign in standalone anterior cervical fusion: Outcomes and fusion rate

Background

The authors aim to demonstrate the feasibility, outcomes and fusion rate of a standalone PEEK cage in the outpatient setting.

Methods

48 consecutive patients undergoing standalone ACDF (S-ACDF) (Group 1) were compared to control group of 49 patients who had ACDF with ACP (Group 2).

Results

Analysis of follow-up at the one year period postoperative outcomes between groups 1 and 2 demonstrated no intergroup statistical significant difference in VAS neck, arm and NDI scores p = 0.414, 0.06 and p = 0.328 respectively.

Conclusion

We conclude that S-ACDF can be safely done in an ambulatory surgery center with satisfactory clinical and patient-reported outcomes.

Ambulatory anterior cervical discectomy and fusion is associated with a higher risk of revision surgery and perioperative complications: an analysis of a large nationwide database

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

With the changing landscape of health care, outpatient spine surgery is being more commonly performed to reduce cost and to improve efficiency. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) is one of the most common spine surgeries performed and demand is expected to increase with an aging population.

PURPOSE

The objective of this study was to determine the nationwide trends and relative complication rates associated with outpatient ACDF.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

This is a large-scale retrospective case control study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

The patient sample included Humana-insured patients who underwent one- to two-level ACDF as either outpatients or inpatients from 2011 to 2016 OUTCOME MEASURES: The outcome measures included incidence and the adjusted odds ratio (OR) of postoperative medical and surgical complications within 1 year of the index surgery.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review was performed of the PearlDiver Humana insurance records database to identify patients undergoing one- to two-level ACDF (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT]-22551 and International Classification of Diseases [ICD]-9-816.2) as either outpatients or inpatients from 2011 to 2016. The incidence of perioperative medical and surgical complications was determined by querying for relevant ICD and CPT codes. Multivariate logistic regression adjusting for age, gender, and Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to calculate ORs of complications among outpatients relative to inpatients undergoing ACDF.

RESULTS

Cohorts of 1,215 patients who underwent outpatient ACDF and 10,964 patients who underwent inpatient ACDF were identified. The median age was in the 65-69 age group for both cohorts. The annual relative incidence of outpatient ACDF increased from 0.11 in 2011 to 0.22 in 2016 (R²=0.82, p=.04). Adjusting for age, gender, and comorbidities, patients undergoing outpatient ACDF were more likely to undergo revision surgery for posterior fusion at both 6 months (OR 1.58, confidence interval [CI] 1.27-1.96, p<.001) and 1 year (OR 1.79, CI 1.51-2.13, p<.001) postoperatively. Outpatient ACDF was also associated with a higher likelihood of revision anterior fusion at 1 year postoperatively (OR 1.46, CI 1.26-1.70, p<.001). Among medical complications, postoperative acute renal failure was more frequently associated with outpatient ACDF than inpatient ACDF (OR 1.25, CI 1.06-1.49, p=.010). Adjusted rates of all other queried surgical and medical complications were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient ACDF is increasing in frequency nationwide over the past several years. Nationwide data demonstrate a greater risk of perioperative surgical complications, including revision anterior and posterior fusion, as well as a higher risk of postoperative acute renal failure. Candidates for outpatient ACDF should be counseled and carefully selected to reduce these risks.

Option for transverse midline incision and other factors that determine patient's decision to have cervical spine surgery

BACKGROUND

Authors aim to determine patients' preference for surgical incision and factors affecting the decision for surgery to the anterior neck.

METHODS

A questionnaire was presented prior to evaluation and if preceded to surgery followup given.

RESULTS

243 patients completed questionnaire, with 60% female population and younger than 50 years. 151 patients preferred a transverse midline incision with a statistically significant increase in outcomes and cosmesis importance and a decrease in the importance of board certification.

CONCLUSION

Findings of questionnaire demonstrate that patients' prefer a transverse midline anterior neck incision, with surgical outcomes being the overall factor affecting decision making.

[Analysis of influence of shell angle of cervical artificial disc on long-term effectiveness of cervical artificial disc replacement]

Objective

To evaluate the influence of the shell angle of cervical artificial disc on long-term effectiveness of cervical artificial disc replacement (CADR).

Methods

The clinical data of 71 patients who were treated with single-level CADR with Bryan prosthesis between December 2003 and December 2007 and followed up more than 10 years, were retrospectively analyzed. There were 44 males and 27 females with an age of 26-69 years (mean, 45.9 years). According to the shell angle of the cervical artificial disc which was measured on the postoperative lateral X-ray film, the patients were divided into kyphotic group (shell angle was negative) and non-kyphotic group. The following evaluation indexes before operation and at last follow-up were compared between 2 groups. Radiographic indexes included the range of motion (ROM) of cervical spine, the ROM of operated level, Cobb angle of operated level (the negative value indicated that the segmental kyphosis occurred at operated level), paravertebral ossification (PO) grades (grades 3 and 4 were high grade PO). Clinical indexes included Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and overall effectiveness evaluation (Odom criteria).

Results

There were 24 patients in kyphotic group and 47 patients in non-kyphotic group. There was no significant difference in baseline data including gender, age, and operated level between 2 groups ( P>0.05). All the patients in 2 groups were followed up 121-165 months (mean, 128 months). There was no significant difference in preoperative ROM of cervical spine and ROM of operated level between 2 groups ( P>0.05); but the preoperative Cobb angle of operated level in kyphosis group was significantly lower than that in non-kyphotic group ( t=2.636, P=0.013). There was no significant difference in ROM of cervical spine at last follow-up between 2 groups ( t=1.393, P=0.168), however, the ROM and the Cobb angle of operated level in kyphotic group were significantly lower than those in non-kyphotic group ( P<0.05). According to the Cobb angle of operated level at last follow-up, there were 9 patients (37.5%) with segmental kyphosis in kyphotic group and 7 patients (14.9%) in non-kyphotic group, showing significant difference ( χ²=4.651, P=0.031). There was a significant difference in PO grades between 2 groups ( Z=2.894, P=0.004) at last follow-up. In kyphotic group, there were 10 patients (41.7%) with low grade PO and 14 patients (58.3%) with high grade PO; and in non-kyphosis group, there were 36 patients (76.6%) with low grade PO and 11 patients (23.4%) with high grade PO. There was no significant difference in JOA scores and NDI before operation and at last follow-up, and the JOA improvement rate, NDI decline, and Odom criteria score at last follow-up between 2 groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

The shell angle of cervical artificial disc may lead to a decrease in the postoperative segmental ROM, and an increased occurrence of segmental kyphosis and high incidence of PO.

Outpatient spine surgery: defining the outcomes, value, and barriers to implementation

Spine surgery is a key target for cost reduction within the United States health care system. One possible strategy involves the transition of inpatient surgeries to the ambulatory setting. Lumbar laminectomy with or without discectomy, lumbar fusion, anterior cervical discectomy and fusion, and cervical disc arthroplasty all represent promising candidates for outpatient surgeries in select populations. In this focused review, the authors clarify the different definitions used in studies describing outpatient spine surgery. They also discuss the body of evidence supporting each of these procedures and summarize the proposed cost savings. Finally, they examine several patient- and surgeon-specific considerations to highlight the barriers in translating outpatient spine surgery into actual practice.

Spine Surgery in the Ambulatory Surgery Center Setting: Value-Based Advancement or Safety Liability?

Here, we systematically review clinical studies that report morbidity and outcomes data for cervical and lumbar surgeries performed in ambulatory surgery centers (ASCs). We focus on anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), posterior cervical foraminotomy, cervical arthroplasty, lumbar microdiscectomy, lumbar laminectomy, and minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion (TLIF) and lateral lumbar interbody fusion, as these are prevalent and surgical spine procedures that are becoming more commonly performed in ASC settings.

A systematic search of PubMed was conducted, using combinations of the following phrases: “outpatient,” “ambulatory,” or “ASC” with “anterior cervical discectomy fusion,” “ACDF,” “cervical arthroplasty,” “lumbar,” “microdiscectomy,” “laminectomy,” “transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,” “spine surgery,” or “TLIF.”

In reviewing the available literature to date, there is ample level 3 (retrospective comparisons) and level 4 (case series) evidence to support both the safety and effectiveness of outpatient cervical and lumbar surgery. While no level 1 or 2 (randomized clinical trials) evidence currently exists, the plethora of real-world clinical data creates a formidable argument for serious investments in ASCs for multiple spine procedures.

National outcomes following single-level cervical disc arthroplasty versus anterior cervical discectomy and fusion

Background

To compare the differences in the thirty-day postoperative outcomes between cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF).

Methods

Patients undergoing primary single-level ACDF and CDA from 2010-2014 were identified by unique Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes within the American College of Surgeon's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database. Primary outcomes included surgical and medical complications, length of hospital stay (LOS), unplanned readmission, return to operating room, and mortality all occurring within 30 days of the initial procedure. Patients were propensity score-matched to reduce selection bias and differences in preoperative characteristics. Multivariate logistic regression models were utilized to determine associations between covariates and primary outcomes of interest.

Results

Propensity score-matching produced a cohort of 1,305 patients with 652 (50.0%) ACDF and 653 (50.0%) CDA patients. There were no statistically significant differences in the development of major surgical or medical complications between the groups. ACDF patients experienced a significantly longer LOS (2.3±14.8 vs. 1.1±1.0 days, P=0.034) and unplanned hospital readmission (1.8% vs. 0.2%, P=0.002). For ACDF patients, increased LOS [odds ratios (OR), 4.21; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.29-13.73; P=0.017] and increased readmission (OR, 12.17; 95% CI, 1.16-127.23; P=0.037) persisted in the multivariate model. Elevated ASA classification, preoperative anemia and elevated white blood cell count (WBC) were also associated with a significantly increased LOS.

Conclusions

Although ACDF and CDA can be indicated for similar cervical pathologies, the latter can be performed safely and effectively with comparable perioperative risk of major complications. The increased readmission rate and LOS for patients undergoing ACDF may have significant impact on patient cost and outcomes.