Of 20,376 Lumbar Discectomies, 2.6% of Patients Readmitted Within 30 Days: Surgical Site Infection, Pain, and Thromboembolic Events Are the Most Common Reasons for Readmission

Prevention and Management of Posterior Wound Complications Following Oncologic Spine Surgery: Narrative Review of Available Evidence and Proposed Clinical Decision-Making Algorithm

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative Review.

OBJECTIVE

Contextualized by a narrative review of recent literature, we propose a wound complication prevention and management algorithm for spinal oncology patients. We highlight available strategies and motivate future research to identify optimal and individualized wound management for this population.

METHODS

We conducted a search of recent studies (2010-2022) using relevant keywords to identify primary literature in support of current strategies for wound complication prevention and management following spine tumor surgery. When primary literature specific to spine tumor cases was not available, data were extrapolated from studies of other spine surgery populations. Results were compiled into a proposed clinical algorithm to guide practice considering available evidence.

RESULTS

Based on available literature, we recommend individualized stratification of patients according to identifiable risk factors for wound complication and propose several interventions which might be employed preventatively, including intrawound antibiotic administration, negative pressure wound therapy, and primary flap closure of the surgical wound. Of these, the available evidence, weighing possible risks vs benefits, most strongly favors primary flap closure of surgical wounds, particularly for patients with multiple risk factors. A secondary algorithm to guide management of wound complications is also proposed.

CONCLUSIONS

Wound complications such as SSI and dehiscence remain a significant source of morbidity following spine tumor surgery. Triaging patients on an individualized basis according to risk factors for complication may aid in selecting appropriate prophylactic strategies to prevent these complications. Future research in this area is still needed to strengthen recommendations.

Association of modic changes and postoperative surgical site infection after posterior lumbar spinal fusion

PURPOSE

Postoperative surgical site infection is one of the most serious complications following spine surgery. Previous studies have reported Modic changes (MC) represent a subclinical infection. This study aims to investigate the relation between Modic changes and surgical site infection after posterior lumbar fusion surgery.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of 424 patients who received posterior lumbar fusion. Preoperative clinical and radiological parameters were recorded. Primary outcome was the rate of postoperative surgical site infection. Covariates included age, body mass index (BMI), sex, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, chronic heart failure, Pfirrmann classification, fused levels, and operation duration. The presence of Modic changes was used as an exposition variable, and adjusted for other risk factors in multivariate analyses.

RESULTS

Of the 424 patients, 30 (7%) developed an acute surgical site infection. Infection had no relation to age, sex, BMI, and comorbidities. There were 212 (50%) patients with MC, and 23 (10.8%) had a surgical site infection, compared to 212 (50%) patients without MC in which there were 7 (3.3%) surgical site infections. MC was associated with surgical site infection in univariate analysis (odds ratio [OR] = 3.56, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.49-8.50, p = 0.004) and multivariate logistic regression analysis (OR = 3.05, 95% CI: 1.26-7.37, p = 0.013). There was statistically significant between specific type (p = 0.035) and grade of MCs (p = 0.0187) and SSI.

CONCLUSIONS

MCs may be a potential risk factor for SSI following posterior lumbar spinal intervertebral fusion. Type I and grade C MCs showed a higher infection rate compared with other MC types and grades.

The Reoperation, Readmission, and Complication Rates at 30 Days Following Lumbar Decompression for Cauda Equina Syndrome

Background and objective Cauda equina syndrome (CES) is considered a surgical emergency, and its primary treatment involves decompression of the nerve roots, typically in the form of discectomy or laminectomy. The primary aim of this study was to determine the complication, reoperation, and readmission rates within 30 days of surgical treatment of CES secondary to disc herniation by using the PearlDiver database (PearlDiver Technologies, Colorado Springs, CO). The secondary aim was to assess preoperative risk factors for a higher likelihood of complication occurrence within 30 days of surgery for CES. Methods A total of 524 patients who had undergone lumbar discectomy or laminectomy for CES were identified. The outcome measures were 30-day reoperation rate for revision decompression or lumbar fusion, and 30-day readmissions related to surgery. The patient data collected included medical history and surgical data including the number of levels of discectomy and laminectomy. Results Based on our findings, intraoperative dural tears, valvular heart disease, and fluid and electrolyte abnormalities were significant risk factors for readmission to the hospital within 30 days following surgery for CES. The most common postoperative complications were as follows: visits to the emergency department (63 patients, 12%), surgical site infection (21 patients, 4%), urinary tract infection (14 patients, 3%), and postoperative anemia (11 patients, 2%). Conclusions In the 30-day period following lumbar decompression for cauda equina syndrome, our findings demonstrated an 8% reoperation rate and 17% readmission rate. Although CES is considered an indication for urgent surgery, gaining awareness about reoperation, readmission, and complication rates in the immediate postoperative period may help calibrate expectations and inform medical decision-making.

Emergency department visits within 90 days of lumbar discectomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar discectomy is a common procedure following which emergency department (ED) visits may occur. Although many quality improvement initiatives target reemissions, ED visits may be more common, be a marker of quality of care, affect patient satisfaction, and contribute to health-care resource utilization and costs.

PURPOSE

To analyze the timing and risk factors predicting ED utilization following lumbar discectomy and thereby facilitate better-targeted risk reduction.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective database review of the 2010 to April 30th, 2021, M157Ortho PearlDiver dataset.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Single-level lumbar laminotomy/discectomy between 2010 and April 30th, 2021, in the PearlDiver M157Ortho dataset.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Functional measures-ED utilization in the 90 days following lumbar discectomy, patient-level predictors for ED utilization, and number and type of reoperations performed in the 90 days following lumbar discectomy.

METHODS

Lumbar laminotomies/discectomies were identified. Patients were excluded if additional procedures were performed or if there was not 90-day follow-up in the dataset. Patient factors were extracted, including age, sex, Elixhauser comorbidity index (ECI), region of the country in which their procedure was performed (Midwest, Northeast, South, West), and patient insurance plan (Commercial, Medicaid, Medicare). The incidence, timing, and frequency of ED utilization within 90 days of lumbar discectomy were then determined. Cohort average weekly ED utilization at 1-year postoperatively was calculated as a baseline for reference. Patient factors predictive of postoperative ED utilization were then determined with univariate and multivariate analyses. Primary diagnoses for ED visits were also categorized. Patients who underwent reoperation for complications related to lumbar discectomy following ED visits were determined, and types of reoperation procedures were characterized.

RESULTS

Of 281,103 lumbar discectomy patients identified, ED visits within 90 days of surgery were identified for 28,632 (10.2%). Of note, 40.4% of these ED visits occurred in the first 2 postoperative weeks. Multivariate analysis revealed several independent predictors of ED utilization following lumbar discectomy, including: younger age (odds ratio [OR] 1.21 per decade decrease), female sex (OR 1.12 relative to male), higher ECI (OR 1.42 per 2-point increase), having surgery performed in the Northeast, Midwest, or West United States (OR 1.05, 1.17, and 1.13, respectively, relative to South), and Medicaid coverage (OR 1.89 relative to Medicare). Forty-three percent of ED visits were surgical site related, of which surgical site pain predominated at 34.2% of overall reasons. Of patients who visited the ED, 943 (3.3%) underwent reoperation in the subsequent 2 weeks. Laminectomy with nerve root decompression was the most performed reoperation (30.9%), followed by incision and drainage (22.5%), posterior nonsegmental instrumentation (10.3%), laminectomy facetectomy and foraminotomy (9.97%), repair of dural/CSF leak or pseudomeningocele with laminectomy (9.3%), repair of dural/CSF leak not requiring laminectomy (8.9%), arthrodesis (4.3%), and posterior segmental instrumentation (3.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Following lumbar discectomy, over 1 in 10 patients were found to visit the ED in the 90 days following their surgery, most commonly in the first 2 postoperative weeks. Specific patient characteristics were associated with such ED visits, with the most common primary diagnoses among ED visitors being surgical site pain. About 3.3% of patients who visited the ED underwent reoperation in the subsequent 2 weeks. Through identification of the timing, risk factors, primary reasons for, and risk of reoperation following ED utilization in the 90-day period after lumbar discectomy, care pathways can be modified to improve patient satisfaction, outcomes, and reduce excess health-care expenditures.

Rheumatoid arthritis patients are at increased risk for adverse events following lumbar discectomy

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Lumbar discectomy is a common procedure for which patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) may be considered. RA is an autoinflammatory disease that may predispose patients to postoperative adverse outcomes.

PURPOSE

To assess the relative odds of adverse events after lumbar discectomy for those with versus without RA in a large, national, administrative dataset.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective cohort study using the 2010 to 2020 MSpine PearlDiver dataset.

PATIENT SAMPLE

After exclusion of patients under 18 years old, those with any trauma, neoplasm, or infection diagnosis within the month before lumbar discectomy, and any patients who had any alternative lumbar spinal surgery performed on the same day as lumbar discectomy, we identified 36,479 lumbar discectomy patients. 2,937 (8.1%) of these patients had a prior diagnosis of RA. After matching 4:1 by patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI, a longitudinal measure of patient comorbidity burden generated via ICD-9 and 10 diagnosis codes), 8,485 lumbar discectomy patients without RA and 2,149 with RA were included.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Incidence of severe and minor adverse events in the 90-days following lumbar discectomy, predictive factors for adverse events within 90-days of lumbar discectomy, risk of adverse events within 90-days of lumbar discectomy stratified by patient medication regimen, 5-year survival to reoperation following lumbar discectomy.

METHODS

Patients undergoing lumbar discectomy were identified from the PearlDiver MSpine dataset. The subset of those with versus without RA were identified and matched 1:4 based on patient age, sex, and ECI scores. The incidence of 90-day adverse events in the two groups was determined and compared by univariate and multivariate analyses. Subgroup analysis was performed based on RA medications being taken.

RESULTS

Matched lumbar discectomy patients with RA (n=2,149) and without RA (n=8,485) were identified. Controlling for patient age, sex, and ECI, those with RA were at significantly higher odds of any (odds ratio [OR] 3.30), severe (OR 2.78), and minor (OR 3.30) adverse events (p<.0001 for all). Stratifying by medications being taken (and relative to those without RA), there was increasing odds of all adverse events (AAE) based on potency of medications (no biologic or disease modifying antirheumatic drugs [DMARDs] OR 2.33, DMARDs only OR 3.86, biologic±DMARDs OR 5.69 (p<.0001 for all). Despite this, no statistically significant difference in 5-year survival from subsequent lumbar surgery was found between those with versus without RA (p=.1000).

CONCLUSIONS

Lumbar discectomy patients with RA were found to be at significantly higher risk for 90-day adverse events following lumbar discectomy, and this was incrementally greater for those on increasingly suppressive medications. Lumbar discectomy patients with RA bear specific consideration and perioperative monitoring when considered for lumbar discectomy.

Risk Factors for 30-day Unplanned Readmission following Surgery for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases: A Systematic Review

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES

Surgical procedures for lumbar degenerative diseases (LDD), which have emerged in the 21-century, are commonly practiced worldwide. Regarding financial burdens and health costs, readmissions within 30days following surgery are inconvenient. We performed a systematic review to integrate real-world evidence and report the current risk factors associated with 30-day readmission following surgery for LDD.

METHODS

The Cochrane Library, Embase, and Medline electronic databases were searched from inception to April 2022 to identify relevant studies reporting risk factors for 30-day readmission following surgery for LDD.

RESULTS

Thirty-six studies were included in the review. Potential risk factors were identified in the included studies that reported multivariate analysis results, including age, race, obesity, higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score, anemia, bleeding disorder, chronic pulmonary disease, heart failure, dependent status, depression, diabetes, frailty, malnutrition, chronic steroid use, surgeries with anterior approach, multilevel spinal surgeries, perioperative transfusion, presence of postoperative complications, prolonged operative time, and prolonged length of stay.

CONCLUSIONS

There are several potential perioperative risk factors associated with unplanned readmission following surgery for LDD. Preoperatively identifying patients that are at increased risk of readmission is critical for achieving the best possible outcomes.

Early Failures After Lumbar Discectomy Surgery: An Analysis of 62 690 Patients

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the rate of early failures (readmission or reoperation for new or recurrent pain/neurological symptoms) within 30 days after lumbar discectomy and identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted of patients undergoing lumbar discectomy in the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database between 2013 and 2017. Rates of readmission for new or recurrent symptoms or reoperation for revision discectomy or fusion within 30 days postoperatively were measured and correlated with risk factors.

RESULTS

In total 62 690 patients were identified; overall rate of readmission within 30 days was 3.3%, including 1.2% for pain or neurological symptoms. Populations at increased risk of readmission were those with 3 or more levels of treatment (2.0%, odds ratio [OR] 2.8%, P < .01), age >70 years (1.8%, OR 1.6, P < .01), class 3 obesity (1.5%, OR 1.4, P = .04), and female gender (1.4%, OR 1.2, P = .02). The overall rate of reoperation within 30 days was 2.2%, including 1.2% for revision decompression or lumbar fusion surgery. Populations at increased risk of reoperation were revision discectomies (1.4%, OR 1.7, P < .01) and females (1.1%, OR 1.4, P < 0.01). Extraforaminal discectomies were associated with lower rates of readmission (0.7%, OR 0.6, P = 0.02) and reoperation (0.4%, OR 0.4, P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Early failures after lumbar discectomy surgery are rare. However, certain subpopulations are associated with increased rates of early failure: obesity, multilevel surgery, females, and revision discectomies.

Predicting patient outcomes after far lateral lumbar discectomy

INTRODUCTION

The LACE+ (Length of Stay, Acuity of Admission, Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) Score, Emergency Department (ED) visits within the previous 6 months) index has never been tested in a purely spine surgery population. This study assesses the ability of LACE + to predict adverse patient outcomes following discectomy for far lateral disc herniation (FLDH).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data were obtained for patients (n = 144) who underwent far lateral lumbar discectomy at a single, multi-hospital academic medical center (2013-2020). LACE + scores were calculated for all patients with complete information (n = 100). The influence of confounding variables was assessed and controlled with stepwise regression. Logistic regression was used to test the ability of LACE + to predict risk of unplanned hospital readmission, ED visits, outpatient office visits, and reoperation after surgery.

RESULTS

Mean age of the population was 61.72 ± 11.55 years, 69 (47.9 %) were female, and 126 (87.5 %) were non-Hispanic white. Patients underwent either open (n = 92) or endoscopic (n = 52) surgery. Each point increase in LACE + score significantly predicted, in the 30-day (30D) and 30-90-day (30-90D) post-discharge window, higher risk of readmission (p = 0.005, p = 0.009; respectively) and ED visits (p = 0.045). Increasing LACE + also predicted, in the 30D and 90-day (90D) post-discharge window, risk of reoperation (p = 0.022, p = 0.016; respectively), and repeat neurosurgical intervention (p = 0.026, p = 0.026; respectively). Increasing LACE + score also predicted risk of reoperation (p = 0.011) within 30 days of initial surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

LACE + may be suitable for characterizing risk of adverse perioperative events for patients undergoing far lateral discectomy.

Timing of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy and Risk of Wound-Related Complications Among Patients With Spinal Metastatic Disease

STUDY DESIGN

This was an epidemiological study using national administrative data from the MarketScan database.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of early versus delayed adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) on wound healing following surgical resection for spinal metastatic disease.

METHODS

We queried the MarketScan database (2007-2016), identifying patients with a diagnosis of spinal metastasis who also underwent RT within 8 weeks of surgery. Patients were categorized into "Early RT" if they received RT within 4 weeks of surgery and as "Late RT" if they received RT between 4 and 8 weeks after surgery. Descriptive statistics and hypothesis testing were used to compare baseline characteristics and wound complication outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 540 patients met the inclusion criteria: 307 (56.9%) received RT within 4 weeks (Early RT) and 233 (43.1%) received RT within 4 to 8 weeks (Late RT) of surgery. Mean days to RT for the Early RT cohort was 18.5 (SD, 6.9) and 39.7 (SD, 7.6) for the Late RT cohort. In a 90-day surveillance period, n = 9 (2.9%) of Early RT and n = 8 (3.4%) of Late RT patients developed wound complications (P = .574).

CONCLUSIONS

When comparing patients who received RT early versus delayed following surgery, there were no significant differences in the rates of wound complications. Further prospective studies should aim to identify optimal patient criteria for early postoperative RT for spinal metastases.

30-Day Recurrence, Readmission Rate, and Clinical Outcome After Emergency Lumbar Discectomy

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the 30-day recurrence rate after emergency lumbar discectomy. Secondary aims were to investigate the factors affecting the 30-day recurrence and readmission rates and clinical outcome.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Excluding cauda equine syndrome (CES) due to massive intervertebral disc herniation, emergency surgery for lumbar disc herniation (LDH) is rarely required. The operation may, however, be performed for other reasons such as persistent or progressive motor paresis associated with radiculopathy or uncontrolled pain. Literature on these topics is scarce.

METHODS

All patients admitted for inpatient care after a visit to the emergency department (ED) due to acute low back pain and who had subsequently undergone an emergency lumbar discectomy during the 4-year study period were included in the study. Patients attending the ED who subsequently had a delayed discectomy formed the control group. Recurrence and readmission rates were analyzed and clinical outcome at 30 days post-surgery was assessed with the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and the visual analog pain scale (VAS).

RESULTS

One hundred thirty patients were admitted to the hospital after visiting the ED and underwent an emergency discectomy after a median of 1.0 days from admittance. Six patients in the study group [4.6% (95% CI: 2.1-9.7)] had recurrent LDH and nine patients in total [6.9% (95% CI: 3.9-12.6)] were readmitted within 30 days. None of the baseline variables clearly predicted recurrence. Mean ODI difference between the study group and controls was 8.1 (95% CI: -6.7-23.2). BMI and surgery by a non-spine surgeon were associated with higher ODI values.

CONCLUSION

An emergency discectomy is associated with a higher rate than expected of both recurrent LDHs and 30-day readmissions. Surgeon experience and patient-related factors had minor effects on the 30-day clinical outcome.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Effect of Surgical Setting on Hospital-Reported Outcomes for Elective Lumbar Spinal Procedures: Tertiary Versus Community Hospitals

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

As hospital compensation becomes increasingly dependent on pay-for-performance and bundled payment compensation models, hospitals seek to reduce costs and increase quality. To our knowledge, no reported data compare these measures between hospital settings for elective lumbar procedures. The study compares hospital-reported outcomes and costs for elective lumbar procedures performed at a tertiary hospital (TH) versus community hospitals (CH) within a single health care system.

METHODS

Retrospective review of a physician-maintained, prospectively collected database consisting of 1 TH and 4 CH for 3 common lumbar surgeries from 2015 to 2016. Patients undergoing primary elective microdiscectomy for disc herniation, laminectomy for spinal stenosis, and laminectomy with fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis were included. Patients were excluded for traumatic, infectious, or malignant pathology. Comparing hospital settings, outcomes included length of stay (LOS), rates of 30-day readmissions, potentially preventable complications (PPC), and discharge to rehabilitation facility, and hospital costs.

RESULTS

A total of 892 patients (n = 217 microdiscectomies, n = 302 laminectomies, and n = 373 laminectomy fusions) were included. The TH served a younger patient population with fewer comorbid conditions and a higher proportion of African Americans. The TH performed more decompressions (P < .001) per level fused; the CH performed more interbody fusions (P = .007). Cost of performing microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy (P = .014) was significantly higher at the TH, but there was no significant difference for laminectomy with fusion. In a multivariable stepwise linear regression analysis, the TH was significantly more expensive for single-level microdiscectomy (P < .001) and laminectomy with single-level fusion (P < .001), but trended toward significance for laminectomy without fusion (P = .052). No difference existed for PPC or readmissions rate. Patients undergoing laminectomy without fusion were discharged to a facility more often at the TH (P = .019).

CONCLUSIONS

We provide hospital-reported outcomes between a TH and CH. Significant differences in patient characteristics and surgical practices exist between surgical settings. Despite minimal differences in hospital-reported outcomes, the TH was significantly more expensive.

Face-to-Face Meetings with Neurosurgical Patients Before Hospital Discharge: Impact on Telephone Outreach, Emergency Department Visits, and Hospital Readmissions

The Johns Hopkins Community Health Partnerships (JCHiP) was developed in 2010 within the Johns Hopkins Health Systems. As part of JCHiP, the Patient Access Line call center was created. The average telephone reach rate at The Johns Hopkins Hospital in 2014 was only 53%. In a population of adult neurosurgical patients, this study aimed to: determine the impact of face-to-face meetings with neurosurgical patients before hospital discharge on telephone follow-up (TFU) reach rates, and determine the association between TFU reach rates and subsequent emergency department (ED) visits and hospital readmission rates. This quasi-experimental study used a posttest-only research design with a comparison group. Two adult inpatient neurosurgical units at the Johns Hopkins Hospital were selected as the intervention and comparison groups. A convenience sampling technique was used. Face-to-face meetings pre hospital discharge resulted in a TFU reach rate of 97.7% on the intervention unit while the comparison unit had only a 76.1% TFU reach rate (P < .001). Reached patients had fewer ED visits (7.8%) than not reached patients (17.4%); however, the difference was not statistically significant (P = .138). Reached patients also had fewer hospital readmissions (3.3%) than not reached patients (8.7%); this also was not statistically significant (P = .214). This study demonstrated that face-to-face meetings with neurosurgical patients prior to discharge increased TFU rates. Results were statistically significant. ED visits and hospital readmissions were also reduced in reached patients and the findings were clinically significant.

[Who benefits from medical technical innovations? : A medical and medical economic analysis using the example of lumbar disc surgery]

Further developments in disease diagnosis and treatment are of immense relevance for advancements in medical care of the population. A detailed cost-benefit analysis of direct and indirect costs is usually unavailable. In the current article, these aspects are investigated using prospectively collected randomized data over two years. Specifically, the surgical treatment of a herniated lumbar disc is addressed, and whether a newly introduced technique (e.g., annular closure device) can lead to a better quality of care and increased patient satisfaction when performed during the standard operation, while also being economically viable.

Evaluation of hospital readmissions for surgical site infections in Italy

Background

The objectives of this investigation are to assess the prevalence of hospital readmissions for surgical site infections (SSIs) in patients aged ≥18 in Italy and to describe the clinical characteristics of these patients and evaluate the possible association with readmission for SSIs.

Methods

A retrospective epidemiological study was conducted between January and May 2015 considering a sample of patients aged ≥18 years admitted to the surgical wards of two hospitals in Naples and undergoing surgery in the year 2014.

Results

3.8% of patients had been readmitted and 28.8% of them were readmitted to hospital due to SSIs. The multiple logistic regression model showed that readmissions for SSIs were significantly more common in smokers (odds ratio [OR] = 3.14; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.13-8.69), in patients with immunosuppression status (OR = 8.28; 95% CI = 1.76-38.87), in patients with low serum albumin (OR = 3.07; 95% CI = 1.05-9.01) and in patients who had undergone a surgical procedure classified as contaminated (OR = 10:44; 95% CI = 3.11-35.01) compared with those that had undergone a surgical procedure classified as clean.

Conclusions

The results point to the need that hospital infection prevention strategies are implemented in order to reduce morbidity and mortality for patients. Moreover, the measures taken to prevent infections would lead to a reduction in health spending since almost one third of readmissions to the hospital in our study were due to SSIs.

What are the Rates, Reasons, and Risk Factors of 90-day Hospital Readmission After Lumbar Discectomy?: An Institutional Experience

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To report the rate, reasons, and risk factors for 90-day readmissions after lumbar discectomy at an academic medical center.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several studies have reported complications and readmissions after spine surgery; however, only one previous study has focused specifically on lumbar discectomy. As the patient profile and morbidity of various spine procedures is different, focus on procedure-specific complications and readmissions will be beneficial.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent lumbar discectomy for unrelieved symptoms of prolapsed intervertebral disk and had at least 90 days of follow-up at an academic institution (2013-2014) were included. Retrospective review of electronic medical record was performed to record demographic and clinical profile of patients. Details of lumbar discectomy, index hospital stay, discharge disposition, hospital readmission within 90 days, reason for readmission and treatment given have been reported. Risk factors for hospital readmission were analyzed by multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 356 patients with a mean age of 45.0±13.8 years were included. The 90-day readmission rate was 5.3% (19/360) of which two-third patients were admitted within 30 days giving a 30-day readmission rate of 3.7% (13/356). The top 2 primary reasons for readmission included back and/or leg pain, numbness, or tingling (42.9%), and persistent cerebrospinal fluid leak or seroma (25.0%). On adjusted analysis, risk factors associated with higher risk of readmission included incidental durotomy [odds ratio (OR), 26.2; 95% confidence interval (CI), 5.3-129.9] and discharge to skilled nursing facility/inpatient rehabilitation (OR, 25.2; 95% CI, 2.7-235.2). Increasing age was a negative predictor of readmission (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.91-0.99).

CONCLUSIONS

Incidental durotomy, younger age, and discharge to nursing facility were associated with higher risk of 90-day hospital readmission after lumbar discectomy. As compared with extensive spine procedures, patient comorbidity burden may not be as significant in predicting readmission after this relatively less invasive procedure.

Outpatient Spine Clinic Utilization is Associated With Reduced Emergency Department Visits Following Spine Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Review of TRICARE claims (2006-2014) data to assess Emergency Department (ED) utilization following spine surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to determine utilization rates and predictors of ED utilization following spine surgical interventions.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Visits to the ED following surgical intervention represent an additional stress to the healthcare system. While factors associated with readmission following spine surgery have been studied, drivers of postsurgical ED visits, including appropriate and inappropriate use, remain underinvestigated.

METHODS

TRICARE claims were queried to identify patients who had undergone one of three common spine procedures (lumbar arthrodesis, discectomy, decompression). ED utilization at 30- and 90 days was assessed as the primary outcome. Outpatient spine surgical clinic utilization was considered the primary predictor variable. Multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

Between 2006 and 2014, 48,868 patients met inclusion criteria. Fifteen percent (n = 7183) presented to the ED within 30 days postdischarge. By 90 days, 29% of patients (n = 14,388) presented to an ED. The 30- and 90-day complication rates were 6% (n = 2802) and 8% (n = 4034), respectively, and readmission rates were 5% (n = 2344) and 8% (n = 3842), respectively. Use of outpatient spine clinic services significantly reduced the likelihood of ED utilization at 30 [odds ratio (OR) 0.48; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.46-0.53] and 90 days (OR 0.55; 95% CI 0.52-0.57).

CONCLUSION

Within 90 days following spine surgery, 29% of patients sought care in the ED. However, only one-third of these patients had a complication recorded, and even fewer were readmitted. This suggests a high rate of unnecessary ED utilization. Outpatient utilization of spine clinics was the only factor independently associated with a reduced likelihood of ED utilization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Longer Operative Time Is Associated With Increased Adverse Events After Anterior Cervical Diskectomy and Fusion: 15-Minute Intervals Matter

Little is known about the impact of operative time, as an independent and interval variable, on general health perioperative outcomes following anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion. Therefore, patients undergoing a 1-level anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. Operative time (as an interval variable) was tested for association with perioperative outcomes using a multivariate regression that was adjusted for differences in baseline characteristics. A total of 15,241 patients were included. Increased surgical duration was consistently correlated with a rise in any adverse event postoperatively, with each additional 15 minutes of operating time raising the risk for having any adverse event by an average of 10% (99.64% confidence interval, 3%-17%, P<.001). In fact, 15-minute increases in surgical duration were associated with incremental increases in the rates of venous thromboembolism, sepsis, unplanned intubation, extended length of hospital stay, and hospital readmission. Greater operative time, despite controlling for other patient variables, increases the risk for overall postoperative adverse events and multiple individual adverse outcomes. This increased risk may be attributed to anesthetic effects, physiologic stresses, and surgical site issues. Although it is difficult to fully isolate operative time as an independent variable because it may be closely related to the complexity of the surgical pathology being addressed, the current study suggests that surgeons should maximize operative efficiency as possible (potentially using strategies that have been shown to improve operative time in the 15-minute magnitude), without compromising the technical components of the procedure. [Orthopedics. 2018; 41(4):e483-e488.].

Risk factors for wound complications following spine surgery

Background

Wound complications, including surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence, are among the most common complications following spine surgery often leading to readmission. The authors sought to identify preoperative characteristics predictive of wound complications after spine surgery.

Methods

The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for years 2012-2014 was reviewed for patients undergoing spine surgery, defined by the Current Procedural Terminology codes. Forty-four preoperative and surgical characteristics were analyzed for associations with wound complications.

Results

Of the 99,152 patients included in this study, 2.2% experienced at least one wound complication (superficial SSI: 0.9%, deep SSI: 0.8%, organ space SSI: 0.4%, and dehiscence: 0.3%). Multivariate binary logistic regression testing found 10 preoperative characteristics associated with wound complications: body mass index ≥30, smoker, female, chronic steroid use, hematocrit <38%, infected wound, inpatient status, emergency case, and operation time >3 hours. A risk score for each patient was created from the number of characteristics present. Receiver operating characteristic curves of the unweighted and weighted risk scores generated areas under the curve of 0.701 (95% CI: 0.690-0.713) and 0.715 (95% CI: 0.704-0.726), respectively. Patients with unweighted risk scores >7 were 25-fold more likely to develop a wound complication compared to patients with scores of 0. In addition, mortality rate, reoperation rate, and total length of stay each increased nearly 10-fold with increasing risk score.

Conclusion

This study introduces a novel risk score for the development of wound dehiscence and SSIs in patients undergoing spine surgery, using new risk factors identified here.