Biomechanical Analysis of Two-level Cervical Disc Replacement With a Stand-alone U-shaped Disc Implant

Comparison of the effects of different artificial discs on hybrid surgery: A finite element analysis

In recent years, artificial cervical discs have been used in intervertebral disc replacement surgery and hybrid surgery (HS). The advantages and disadvantages of different artificial cervical discs in artificial cervical disc replacement surgery have been compared. However, few scholars have studied the biomechanical effects of various artificial disc prostheses on the human cervical spine in HS which include the Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF) and Cervical Disc Arthroplasty (CDA). This study compared the biomechanical behavior of Mobi-C and Prestige LP in the operative and adjacent segments during two-level hybrid surgery. A three-dimensional finite element model of C2-C7 was first established and validated. Subsequently, clinical surgery was then simulated to establish a surgical model of anterior cervical fusion at the C4-C5 level. Mobi-C and Prestige-LP artificial disc prostheses were implanted at the C5-C6 level to create two hybrid models. All finite element models were fixed on the lower endplate of the C7 vertebra and subjected to a load of 73.6 N and different directions of 1 Nm torque on the odontoid process of the C2 vertebra to simulate human flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation. This paper compares the ROM, intervertebral pressure, and facet joint force after hybrid surgery with the intact model. The results show that compared with Prestige LP, Mobi-C can improve ROM of the replacement segment and compensate for the intervertebral pressure of the adjacent segment more effectively, but the facet joint pressure of the replacement segment may be higher.

Biomechanical effect of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone in consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis

BACKGROUND

Intermediate vertebral collapse is a newly discovered complication of consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). There have been no analytical studies related to the effects of endplate defects on the biomechanics of the intermediate vertebral bone after ACDF. This study aimed to compare the effects of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone biomechanics in the zero-profile (ZP) and cage-and-plate (CP) methods of consecutive 2-level ACDF and to determine whether collapse of the intermediate vertebra is more likely to occur using ZP.

METHODS

A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of the intact cervical spine (C2-T1) was constructed and validated. The intact FE model was then modified to build ACDF models and imitate the situation of endplate injury, establishing two groups of models (ZP, IM-ZP and CP, IM-ZP). We simulated cervical motion, such as flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation, and compared the range of motion (ROM), upper and lower endplate stress, fusion fixation device stress, C5 vertebral body stress, intervertebral disc internal pressure (intradiscal pressure, or IDP) and the ROM of adjacent segments in the models.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference between the IM-CP model and the CP model in the ROM of the surgical segment, upper and lower endplate stress, fusion fixation device stress, C5 vertebral body stress, IDP, or ROM of the adjacent segments. Compared with the CP model, the endplate stress of the ZP model is significantly higher in the flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation conditions. Compared with the ZP model, endplate stress, screw stress, C5 vertebral stress and IDP in IM-ZP were significantly increased under flexion, extension, lateral bending and axial rotation conditions.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to consecutive 2-level ACDF using CP, collapse of the intermediate vertebra is more likely to occur using ZP due to its mechanical characteristics. Intraoperative endplate defects of the anterior lower margin of the middle vertebra are a risk factor leading to collapse of the middle vertebra after consecutive 2-level ACDF using ZP.

From Mechanobiology to Mechanical Repair Strategies: A Bibliometric Analysis of Biomechanical Studies of Intervertebral Discs

Neck pain and low back pain are major challenges in public health, and intervertebral disc (IVD) biomechanics is an important multidisciplinary field. To date, no bibliometric literature review of the relevant literature has been performed, so we explored the emerging trends, landmark studies, and major contributors to IVD biomechanics research. We searched the Web of Science core collection (1900–2022) using keywords mainly composed of “biomechanics” and “intervertebral disc” to conduct a bibliometric analysis of original papers and their references, focusing on citations, authors, journals, and countries/regions. A co-citation analysis and clustering of the references were also completed. A total of 3189 records met the inclusion criteria. In the co-citation network, cluster #0, labeled as “annulus fibrosus tissue engineering”, and cluster #1, labeled as “micromechanical environment”, were the biggest clusters. References by MacLean et al and Holzapfel et al were positioned exactly between them and had high betweenness centrality. There existed a research topic evolution between mechanobiology and mechanical repair strategies of IVDs, and the latter had been identified as an emerging trend in IVD biomechanics. Numerous landmark studies had contributed to several fields, including mechanical testing of normal and pathological IVDs, mechanical evaluation of new repair strategies and development of finite element model. Adams MA was the author most cited by IVD biomechanics papers. Spine, the European Spine Journal, and the Journal of Biomechanics were the three journals where the most original articles and their references have been published. The United States has contributed most to the literature (n = 1277 papers); however, the research output of China is increasing. In conclusion, the present study suggests that IVD repair is an emerging trend in IVD biomechanics.

Numerical Size Optimization of Cervical Spine Disc Prosthesis Mobi-C Using Design of Experiment Technics

The cervical spine is a structure subject to various vertebral injuries, namely, herniation of intervertebral discs and osteoporosis. Nowadays, several segments of society are vulnerable to these diseases that affect spine motion especially elderly people and women. Hence, various designs of cervical artificial discs are in use or under investigation claiming to restore the normal kinematics of the cervical spine. In this work, it is proposed to minimize the stress level by numerical size optimization in the Mobi-C cervical spine prosthesis to improve their biomechanical performances. For this aim, design of experiment (DoE) is employed as an optimization technique to investigate three geometrical parameters of the prosthesis design. Accordingly, DoE optimization allowed to minimize the equivalent stress value on Mobi-C from 20.3 MPa to 17.856 MPa corresponding to a percentage decrease of 12% from the original geometry. This provides an advantage for the durability of the prosthesis and also for the bone by reducing stress concentration.

Investigation into Cervical Spine Biomechanics Following Single, Multilevel and Hybrid Disc Replacement Surgery with Dynamic Cervical Implant and Fusion: A Finite Element Study

Cervical fusion has been a standard procedure for treating abnormalities associated with the cervical spine. However, the reliability of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) has become arguable due to its adverse effects on the biomechanics of adjacent segments. One of the drawbacks associated with ACDF is adjacent segment degeneration (ASD), which has served as the base for the development of dynamic stabilization systems (DSS) and total disc replacement (TDR) devices for cervical spine. However, the hybrid surgical technique has also gained popularity recently, but its effect on the biomechanics of cervical spine is not well researched. Thus, the objective of this FE study was to draw a comparison among single-level, bi-level, and hybrid surgery with dynamic cervical implants (DCIs) with traditional fusion. Reductions in the range of motion (ROM) for all the implanted models were observed for all the motions except extension, compared to for the intact model. The maximum increase in the ROM of 42% was observed at segments C5–C6 in the hybrid DCI model. The maximum increase in the adjacent segment’s ROM of 8.7% was observed in the multilevel fusion model. The maximum von Mises stress in the implant was highest for the multilevel DCI model. Our study also showed that the shape of the DCI permitted flexion/extension relatively more compared to lateral bending and axial rotation.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Different Surgical Approaches for the Treatment of Adjacent Segment Diseases After Primary Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis

Symptomatic adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a common challenge after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF). The objective of this study was to compare the biomechanical effects of a second ACDF and laminoplasty for the treatment of ASD after primary ACDF. We developed a finite element (FE) model of the C2-T1 based on computed tomography images. The FE models of revision surgeries of ACDF and laminoplasty were simulated to treat one-level and two-level ASD after primary ACDF. The range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure (IDP) of the adjacent segments, and stress in the cord were analyzed to investigate the biomechanical effects of the second ACDF and laminoplasty. The results indicated that revision surgery of one-level ACDF increased the ROM and IDP at the C2–C3 segment, whereas two-level ACDF significantly increased the ROM and IDP at the C2–C3 and C7-T1 segments. Furthermore, no significant changes in the ROM and IDP of the laminoplasty models were observed. The stress in the cord of the re-laminoplasty model decreased to some extent, which was higher than that of the re-ACDF model. In conclusion, both ACDF and laminoplasty can relieve the high level of stress in the spinal cord caused by ASD after primary ACDF, whereas ACDF can achieve better decompression effect. Revision surgery of the superior ACDF or the superior and inferior ACDF after the primary ACDF increased the ROM and IDP at the adjacent segments, which may be the reason for the high incidence of recurrent ASD after second ACDF.

Biomechanical modelling of the facet joints: a review of methods and validation processes in finite element analysis

There is an increased interest in studying the biomechanics of the facet joints. For in silico studies, it is therefore important to understand the level of reliability of models for outputs of interest related to the facet joints. In this work, a systematic review of finite element models of multi-level spinal section with facet joints output of interest was performed. The review focused on the methodology used to model the facet joints and its associated validation. From the 110 papers analysed, 18 presented some validation of the facet joints outputs. Validation was done by comparing outputs to literature data, either computational or experimental values; with the major drawback that, when comparing to computational values, the baseline data was rarely validated. Analysis of the modelling methodology showed that there seems to be a compromise made between accuracy of the geometry and nonlinearity of the cartilage behaviour in compression. Most models either used a soft contact representation of the cartilage layer at the joint or included a cartilage layer which was linear elastic. Most concerning, soft contact models usually did not contain much information on the pressure-overclosure law. This review shows that to increase the reliability of in silico model of the spine for facet joints outputs, more needs to be done regarding the description of the methods used to model the facet joints, and the validation for specific outputs of interest needs to be more thorough, with recommendation to systematically share input and output data of validation studies.

Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

To compare the biomechanical changes of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) versus cervical disc arthroplasty (CDA).

METHODS

A three-dimensional finite element (FE) model of intact C2-C7 segments was constructed and validated. In the one-level surgery model, the cage with plate implant or Prestige LP cervical disc prosthesis were integrated at C5-C6 segment into the FE model; while in the two-level surgery model, the prostheses were integrated at both C4-C5 and C5-C6 segments into the FE model. A pure moment of 1.0 Nm combined with a follower load of 73.6 N were imposed on C2 to investigate the flexion-extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation of different segments in the FE model. The segmental range of motion (ROM) and intradiscal pressure of the surgery models were investigated and compared with the intact model.

RESULTS

In the one-level model of ACDF, the ROM at C5-C6 was decreased, the ROM and intradiscal pressure at C4-C5 and C6-C7 segments were increased. In the two-level model of ACDF, the ROM at C4-C5 and C5-C6 were decreased, the ROM and intradiscal pressure at C3-C4 and C6-C7 were increased. However, in both one- and two-level models of CDA, the ROM of surgery segments were preserved, avoiding the increase of the ROM and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent segments.

CONCLUSIONS

Abnormal ROM and intradiscal pressure at the adjacent segments may contribute to the higher risk of ASD after ACDF compared with CDA.

Percutaneous posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy: a finite element analysis and radiological assessment

Percutaneous posterior full-endoscopic cervical foraminotomy and discectomy (PECFD) is recognized as a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR). However, the potential mechanisms of the degenerative changes and postoperative recurrence after PECFD are unclear. In this study, a finite element (FE) analysis and radiological assessment were performed to evaluate the biomechanical effects after PECFD. The FE model indicated that the ROM and IDP of C5-C6 increased significantly after PECFD in the extension loading. The radiological evaluation revealed that the extension ROM of C2-C7 and the operative level increased significantly at the one-year follow-up compared with that obtained preoperatively. Combining the FE results and radiological changes, we conclude that the increase in the ROM and IDP at the operative level in the extension loading is the potential cause of the degenerative changes and recurrences after PECFD surgery.

Optimization of Three-Level Cervical Hybrid Surgery to Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease: A Finite Element Study

Hybrid surgery (HS) allows surgeons to tailor fusion and arthroplasty in the treatment of multiple-level cervical disc degeneration. However, the decision making of selecting either ACDF or ADR for each level in three-level HS remains controversial and has not been fully investigated. This study was aimed to optimize three-level cervical hybrid constructs by systematically investigating their biomechanical properties and their effect on adjacent levels. A finite element model of cervical spine (C2–C7) was developed, and eight C3–C6 surgical models including six HS were constructed. The range of motion (ROM) in flexion, extension, lateral bending, and axial rotation under 2.0 Nm moments with 30 N follower load were simulated. The von Mises stress, strain energy at the adjacent intervertebral disc (IVD) and force at the adjacent facet were calculated. The ROM of the hybrid constructs and adjacent levels was close to that of the intact spine. HS with arthroplasty performed at C5-6 had better performance in terms of ROM reduction at the inferior adjacent level (C6-7). Moreover, C-D-D and 3ADR had best performance in reducing the von Mises stress and strain energy at C6-7. All HS reduced the facet burden at both C2-3 and C6-7 levels. However, the major drawback of HS revealed here is that the effect of C6-7 protection is at the cost of increased C2-3 IVD burden. In conclusion, we recommend C-D-D and 3ADR for patient with C3–C6 disc degeneration without predisposing C2-3 condition. C-C-D could be a good alternative with a lower medical cost. This analysis guides the decision making in three-level cervical HS before future cadaver studies or human clinical trials.

Simplifying the human lumbar spine (L3/L4) material in order to create an elemental structure for the future modeling

The human lumbar spine incorporates the best joints in nature due to its optimal static and dynamic behavior against the internal and external loads. Developing an elemental structure based on this joint requires simplification in terms of the materials employed by keeping the mechanical and anatomical behaviors of the human lumbar spine. In the present study, the finite element (FE) of two motion segments of the human lumbar spine (L3/L4) was developed based on the CT scan data as the base for vertebrae geometry, verified geometry properties for another part of two motion segments, and combination of materials and loads obtained from the validated resources. Then, simplification occurred in four continuous steps such as omitting the annual fibers of annual matrix, representing the material of the annual matrix to the nucleus, demonstrating the material of annual matrix to the endplates too, and omitting the trabecular part of vertebrae. The present study aimed to propose the method for developing the basic structure of the human lumbar spine by simplifying its materials in the above-mentioned steps, analyzing the biomechanical effects of these four steps in terms of their internal and external responses, and validating the data obtained from the FE method. The validated simplified way introduced in this study can be used for future research by making implants, prosthesis, and modeling based on the human lumbar spine in other fields such as industrial design, building structures, or joints, which results in making the model easier, cheaper, and more effective.

Comparison of Multilevel Cervical Disc Replacement and Multilevel Anterior Discectomy and Fusion: A Systematic Review of Biomechanical and Clinical Evidence

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to comprehensively compare the clinical and biomechanical efficiency of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) with anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) for treatment of multilevel cervical disc disease using a meta-analysis and systematical review.

METHODS

A literature search was performed using PubMed, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library for articles published between January 1960 and December 2017. Both clinical and biomechanical parameters were analyzed. Statistical tests were conducted by Revman 5.3. Nineteen studies including 10 clinical studies and 9 biomechanical studies were filtered out.

RESULTS

The pooled results for clinical efficiency showed that no significant difference was observed in blood loss (P = 0.09; mean difference [MD], 7.38; confidence interval [CI], -1.16 to 15.91), hospital stay (P = 0.33; MD, -0.25; CI, -0.76 to 0.26), Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores (P = 0.63; MD, -0.11; CI, -0.57 to 0.34), visual analog scale (P = 0.08; MD, -0.50; CI, -1.06 to 0.05), and Neck Disability Index (P = 0.33; MD, -0.55; CI, -1.65 to 0.56) between the 2 groups. Compared with ACDF, ACDR did show increased surgical time (P = 0.03; MD, 31.42; CI, 2.71-60.14). On the other hand, ACDR showed increased index range of motion (ROM) (P < 0.00001; MD, 13.83; CI, 9.28-18.39), lower rates of adjacent segment disease (ASD) (P = 0.001; odds ratio [OR], 0.27; CI, 0.13-0.59), complications (P = 0.006; OR, 0.62; CI, 0.45-0.87), and rate of subsequent surgery (P < 0.00001; OR, 0.25; CI, 0.14-0.44). As for biomechanical performance, ACDR maintained index ROM and avoided compensation in adjacent ROM and tissue pressure.

CONCLUSIONS

Multilevel ACDR may be an effective and safe alternative to ACDF in terms of clinical and biomechanical performance. However, further multicenter and prospective studies should be conducted to obtain a stronger and more reliable conclusion.

Prosthesis and Hybrid Strategy Consideration for Treating Two-level Cervical Disc Degeneration in Hybrid Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Biomechanical analysis using a validated nonlinear finite element (FE) model.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to combine the strategy of two-level hybrid surgery (HS) to explore how prostheses affect cervical biomechanics.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Few FE studies have explored differences in biomechanical behavior between combined and stand-alone structured prostheses with HS. No FE studies have considered whether the prosthesis type and hybrid strategy influence two-level HS.

METHODS

Three prostheses-Prodisc-C, PCM, and DCI-were analyzed in flexion and extension during HS at C4-C6. There were two HS constructs: anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) conducted at the C4-C5 levels and anterior cervical disc replacement (ACDR) conducted at C5-C6 levels (ACDF/ACDR); ACDR/ACDF.

RESULTS

Flexion motion at adjacent levels was greater than that of intact spine. A maximum increase of 80% was observed with PCM in the ACDF/ACDR group. Extension motion at adjacent levels for both hybrid strategies with PCM, however, was similar to that of intact spine (<10% change), whereas it increased by 14% to 32% with DCI. The strain energy-storing capability with DCI tended to be similar to that of normal discs. Facet stress at the infra-adjacent level, however, significantly increased with DCI in both groups, whereas it increased with PCM and Prodisc-C only in the ACDR/ACDF group. All prostheses produced overloads on cartilage at the arthroplasty level. Prodisc-C and PCM cores showed stress above the yield stress of ultrahigh-molecular-weight polyethylene.

CONCLUSION

Each prosthesis had advantages and disadvantages. In extension, DCI (vs. Prodisc-C and PCM) exhibited more compensation at adjacent levels in terms of motion, moments, and facet stress. The biomechanical performance of Prodisc-C was easily affected by the hybrid strategy. Thus, if only a combined-structure prosthesis is available for two-level HS (C4-C6 level), the hybrid strategy should be carefully evaluated and the ACDF/ACDR construct is recommended to avoid accelerating degeneration of adjacent segments.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5.