1
|
Baig AAM, Ansari B, Ahmed SI, Ishaque F, Farooqui WA. Association of demographics, lumbar active range of motion and disability in chronic low back: a baseline data analysis of a randomized controlled trial from Pakistan. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 2024; 25:489. [PMID: 38909184 PMCID: PMC11193308 DOI: 10.1186/s12891-024-07613-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2024] [Indexed: 06/24/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The disability and significant economic costs accredited to Low back pain (LBP) are likely to rise which is an essential problem in low and middle-income countries like Pakistan. The associated factors of LBP are age, sex, and race including physical activity, high spinal load, lifting, bending, and twisting occupations. The literature highlighted there is substantial differences in associated factors of LBP within available studies in developing countries. The objective is to investigate the association of demographic factors and lumbar range of motion with disability in patients with chronic low back. METHODS A baseline data analysis was performed as an analytical cross-sectional study among 150 patients with chronic low back in a randomized controlled trial with a duration from March 2020 and January 2021. After recording demographics, Modified-Modified Schober's test was used to measure lumbar flexion and extension and Oswestry disability index for disability. After the descriptive analysis the continuous variables, age and pain were analyzed with Spearman's correlation. Variables that were significant in bivariate analysis were then fitted in a multivariable linear regression. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to analyze variations of disability in gender, marital status, work status, education level, and duration of pain. The p-value of 0.05 was significant. RESULTS The results showed a significant correlation between age and pain in sitting (rh=-0.189, p = 0.021 and rh = 0.788, p < 0.001) with the disability but no significant effects of age and pain in sitting (B=-0.124, p = 0.212 and B = 1.128, p = 0.082) on disability were found. The decrease in lumbar flexion and extension was found to increase disability (B=-6.018 and - 4.032 respectively with p < 0.001). Female gender (x2(1) = 15.477, p = < 0.001) and unmarried marital status (x2(1) = 4.539, p = 0.033) had more disability than male gender and married marital status, respectively. There was a significance between groups of the duration of pain regarding disability (x2 (2) = 70.905, p < 0.001). Age, education level, and work status showed no significance (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS The female gender and unmarried marital status are associated with functional disability. Decreased lumbar range of motion accompanies more disability, while age, education level, and work status do not effect on disability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Basit Ansari
- Department of Health, Physical Education and Sports Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Syed Imran Ahmed
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Iqra University, North Campus, Karachi, Pakistan
| | - Farhan Ishaque
- Department of Physiotherapy, Dow Institute of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Leech JB, MacPherson KL, Klopper M, Shumway J, Salvatori RT, Rhon DI, Young JL. The relationships between pain-associated psychological distress, pain intensity, patient expectations, and physical function in individuals with musculoskeletal pain: A retrospective cohort study. PM R 2023; 15:1371-1381. [PMID: 37041723 DOI: 10.1002/pmrj.12983] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/15/2023] [Indexed: 04/13/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The presence of pain-associated psychological distress (PAPD) in musculoskeletal disorders, including negative mood, fear-avoidance, and lack of positive affect/coping, is associated with prolonged disability. The importance of considering psychological influence on pain is well known, but practical ways of addressing it are not as straightforward. Identifying relationships between PAPD and pain intensity, patient expectations, and physical function may guide the development of future studies that assess causality and inform clinical practice. OBJECTIVE To assess the relationship between PAPD measured by the Optimal Screening for Prediction of Referral and Outcome-Yellow Flag tool, and baseline pain intensity, expectations of treatment effectiveness, and self-reported physical function at discharge. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study. SETTING Hospital-based outpatient physical therapy. PARTICIPANTS Patients 18 to 90 years old with spinal pain or lower extremity osteoarthritis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Pain intensity and patient expectations of treatment effectiveness at intake, and self-reported physical function at discharge. RESULTS A total of 534 patients, 56.2% female, median (interquartile range [IQR]) age 61 (21) years with an episode of care between November 2019 and January 2021 were included. A multiple linear regression showed a significant association between PAPD and pain intensity with 6.4% (p < .001) of the variance explained. PAPD explained 3.3% (p < .001) of the variance in patient expectations. One additional yellow flag present resulted in a 0.17-point increase in pain intensity and 1.3% decrease in patient expectations. PAPD was also associated with physical function with 3.2% (p < .001) of the variance explained. PAPD explained 9.1% (p < .001) of the variance in physical function at discharge in the low back pain cohort only when assessed independently by body region. CONCLUSION These findings support the theory that the pain experience is complex and multiple factors should be considered when evaluating a patient with musculoskeletal pain. Clinicians who have identified PAPD may consider these relationships when planning or modifying interventions and pursuing multidisciplinary collaboration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph B Leech
- Bellin College, Department of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
- The University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, College of Rehabilitative Sciences, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Kevin L MacPherson
- Bellin College, Department of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
- South College, School of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Mareli Klopper
- Bellin College, Department of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Joshua Shumway
- Bellin College, Department of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Robert T Salvatori
- Bellin College, Department of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
- The University of St. Augustine for Health Sciences, College of Rehabilitative Sciences, Doctor of Physical Therapy Program, Austin, Texas, USA
| | - Daniel I Rhon
- Bellin College, Department of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Jodi L Young
- Bellin College, Department of Physical Therapy, Doctor of Science in Physical Therapy Program, Green Bay, Wisconsin, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Alanazi F, Alrwaily M. Cultural Adaptation, Reliability and Validation of the Arabic Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire in Patients with Low Back Pain. J Pain Res 2023; 16:317-325. [PMID: 36756204 PMCID: PMC9900143 DOI: 10.2147/jpr.s375202] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2023] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Background The Örebro Musculoskeletal Pain Questionnaire (ÖMPQ) assesses the psychosocial factors in people with complaints of musculoskeletal disorders and predicts those likely to develop persistent symptoms. Objective To culturally-adapt and assess the validity of the ÖMPQ in an Arabic population with low back pain (LBP). Methods This was a prospective cohort validation study of the ÖMPQ. The Arabic-ÖMPQ was created by forward translation, translation synthesis and backward translation in an Arabic population. Participants were included if they were 18 years or older, had acute or chronic LBP and were fluent in Arabic. Eighty-four patients completed the questionnaires at baseline, 2 days later and 3 months follow-up. We assessed specific agreement and test-retest reliability using the interclass correlation coefficient (ICC). We assessed predictive validity using linear regression and relative risk. We assessed content validity by investigating the ceiling and floor effects. Results To construct validity, the Arabic-ÖMPQ had a moderate (r≥0.3, <0.5) to high (r≥0.5) correlation with pain, disability, fear-avoidance and catastrophizing questionnaires. The test-rest reliability was high ICC2,1=0.92 (95% CI: 0.83-0.96). The Arabic-ÖMPQ score at baseline can significantly predict disability at 3 months F(1,82)=33.87, p<0.01; R2=0.29. Conclusion The translation of the Arabic-ÖMPQ into Arabic was successful. The Arabic-ÖMPQ showed very good reliability and proper validity and thus can be used to predict the risk of developing persistent disability amongst patients with LBP in an Arabic population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fahad Alanazi
- Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia,Correspondence: Fahad Alanazi, Department of Physical Therapy and Health Rehabilitation, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Jouf University, Sakaka, Jouf Region, Saudi Arabia, Email
| | - Muhammad Alrwaily
- Division of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alamam D, Alrushud A, Alodaibi F, Alhowimel A, Almarzouq R, Alangari R, Khunain SB, Alosaimi W, Almoheidib S. Reassurance regarding educational messages in people with non-specific low back pain: A cross-sectional study. Musculoskeletal Care 2022; 20:937-944. [PMID: 35962533 DOI: 10.1002/msc.1683] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2022] [Revised: 07/24/2022] [Accepted: 07/28/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION/OBJECTIVES Educational messages related to Low back pain (LBP) are often contradictory and drive maladaptive beliefs, as they conflict with the latest research evidence. This study aims to examine participants' reassurance levels in relation to educational messages regarding LBP among the Saudi population with the condition compared to those without it, and to assess the association between levels of reassurance and fear avoidance. METHODS A list of 13 educational messages about LBP was generated from LBP-educational resources in Saudi Arabia, and from expert consensus on a set of evidence-based key messages for people with LBP. Consented respondents with LBP of various durations and those without the condition completed a questionnaire containing questions on demographic characteristics, the absence or presence of LBP and its intensity, and the fear-avoidance beliefs questionnaire (FABQ). We also asked them to rate their level of perceived reassurance regarding the educational messages using a Likert-type scale from 0 to 10. RESULTS Participants (n = 1652) reported that the 13 educational messages had reassured them about LBP. However, there was no significant difference between participants with and without LBP (p ≥ 0.05). There was an overall weak association between the responses to the 13 educational messages and the fear-avoidance questionnaire. However, reassurance levels regarding most of the educational messages were negatively associated with the FABQ. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION We demonstrate that people with and without LBP need reassurance about the condition. Furthermore, we show that as reassurance increases, fear-avoidance decreases, confirming the complex nature of LBP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalyah Alamam
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Asma Alrushud
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris Alodaibi
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Raghad Almarzouq
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Raneem Alangari
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara Bin Khunain
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Waad Alosaimi
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara Almoheidib
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Alamam D, Alhowimel A, Alodaibi F, Alsobayel H. Are healthcare providers offering the proper education for people with low back pain? Content analysis of educational materials. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2022; 35:1269-1276. [PMID: 35599466 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-210232] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disorder and leading cause of disability worldwide. In Saudi Arabia, patients with LBP are dispensed with educational materials to supposedly facilitate their recuperation. OBJECTIVE Appraise the suitability of educational materials provided for people with LBP in Saudi Arabia to determine whether they meet the needs of patients, inform self-management, and are consistent with clinical practice guidelines. METHODS A qualitative data collection method was used, and content analyses were conducted to analyse data based on manifest content. Educational items in English and Arabic were collected from relevant health providers in Saudi Arabia. RESULTS Seventeen educational materials were sourced from: Ministry of Health hospitals (n= 10), military hospitals (n= 4), private hospitals (n= 2), and a multidisciplinary healthcare association (n= 1). Six identified sub-themes comprise: epidemiological/anatomical data about LBP (n= 6); causes/risk factors (n= 10); exercise (n= 14) and physical activity-related (n= 3) recommendations; treatment-related recommendations (n= 2); general health and lifestyle-related recommendations (n= 8); and postural and ergonomics-related recommendations (n= 13). A common theme emerged, that 'the content of educational materials hindered reassurance and self-management for people with LBP.' CONCLUSION The reviewed educational materials fail to adequately report information that assure patients or inform their self-management among the Saudi population with LBP. Further, reviewed items are heavily influenced by the biomedical model of pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalyah Alamam
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Ahmed Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Alkarj, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris Alodaibi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Hana Alsobayel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia.,Research Chair for Health Care Innovation, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Alrushud AS, Alamam DM, Almurdi MM, Almutairi SK, Alzahrani RO, Alanazi MS, Dhahi WM, Alshaiqy DM. Primary Investigation of Low Back Pain among Saudi Arabians: A Cross-Sectional Study. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:12854. [PMID: 36232153 PMCID: PMC9565200 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph191912854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
Low back pain (LBP) is a prevalent disease that affects all ages and is a symptom that induces immobility. Patients' beliefs may influence LBP management, and adjusting detrimental beliefs is required to improve treatment outcomes. Our aim was to evaluate the prevalence of LBP within the Saudi population and beliefs regarding LBP, physical activity, rest, imaging, and medication. People with LBP were targeted with a questionnaire containing sections on demographic information and the validated Back Beliefs Questionnaire (BBQ), in addition to questions regarding imaging, physical activity, rest and medication. A total of 651 responses were received, 559 of them (86%) experienced LBP. The most common age group was those aged 18-21 (n = 221), 80% from females. The average BBQ score was 27.8 (SD = 5.58). The majority of the respondents held the following beliefs, which are contrary to the best available evidence: back pain must be rested (77.1%) and X-rays or scans are required to gain the best medical care for LBP (73.2%). The Saudi population holds unhelpful beliefs that may affect their quality of life. Healthcare professionals working with patients with LBP have an important role in changing detrimental beliefs and behaviors about the condition.
Collapse
|
7
|
Alhowimel A, Alodaibi F, Alotaibi M, Alamam D, Fritz J. Comparison of attitudes and beliefs of physical therapists and primary care physicians regarding low back pain management: A cross-sectional study. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 2022; 35:803-809. [PMID: 34657870 PMCID: PMC9398080 DOI: 10.3233/bmr-200295] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The first-line contact for patients seeking care for low back pain (LBP) can potentially change the disease course. The beliefs and attitudes of healthcare providers (HCPs) can influence LBP management. Although referring patients with LBP to physical therapy is common, the first-line contact for patients with LBP in Saudi Arabia is the primary care physician (PCP). Physical therapy will soon be integrated into primary care; therefore, it is rational to compare physical therapists' (PTs) beliefs and attitudes regarding LBP with those of PCPs. OBJECTIVE We compared PCPs' and PTs' attitudes and beliefs regarding LBP management. METHODS We employed a cross-sectional, voluntary response sample research design using the Pain Attitudes and Beliefs Scale (PABS). Participants were PTs and PCPs practicing in Saudi Arabia. RESULTS In total, 153 participants completed the PABS (111 PTs and 52 PCPs). PCPs demonstrated significantly higher PABS biomedical subscale scores than did the PTs. CONCLUSIONS HCPs in Saudi Arabia should receive additional training to adopt a biopsychosocial approach to managing LBP. In this study, the HCPs' treatment recommendations may not correspond with contemporary clinical guidelines. Research to facilitate the implementation of optimal professional education and training to adopt a biopsychosocial approach is an urgent priority.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia,Corresponding author: Ahmed Alhowimel, Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, AlKharj 11942, Saudi Arabia. Tel.: +966 115886354; E-mails: ;
| | - Faris Alodaibi
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mazyad Alotaibi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Science, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dalyah Alamam
- College of Applied Medical Sciences, Health Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Julie Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Association Between Psychosocial Parameters and Response to Chiropractic Care Among Older Adults With Chronic Low Back Pain: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2022; 44:675-682. [PMID: 35753883 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2022.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/29/2021] [Revised: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 03/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study was to determine whether baseline self-efficacy, fear of pain with movement (kinesiophobia), or change in either were associated with clinically important improvement in disability among older adults with chronic low back pain after 12 weeks of chiropractic spinal manipulation (CSM) and exercise. METHODS This secondary analysis used randomized trial data from community-dwelling adults aged 65 years or older with chronic spinal disability who received non-pharmacological treatment of CSM and exercise. Those with ≥30% reduction in the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) after 12 weeks of treatment were considered responders to care. Psychosocial measures included the Pain Self-Efficacy Questionnaire (PSEQ) and the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). Logistic regression-assessed associations were between psychosocial, demographic, and low back predictors and 30% ODI improvement. RESULTS There were 176 community-dwelling older adults included in this analysis. Mean age was 71 years, 59.7% were women; 176 (96.7%) had complete data. Baseline disability (ODI = 26.1 ± 9.3) and back pain (5.0 ± 1.9, 0-10 scale) were moderate. Baseline PSEQ reflected higher self-efficacy (47.7 ± 7.8, 0-60 scale) with minimal kinesiophobia (TSK 34.3 ± 5.2, 17-68 scale). Seventy-two (40.9%) achieved 30% reduction in ODI (mean -5.4 ± 7.9) after 12 weeks of treatment. Mean self-efficacy improvement was clinically important (2.5 ± 6.5 points); kinesiophobia (-2.7 ± 4.4 points) and LBP (-1.6 points) also improved. Baseline PSEQ and percent improvement in PSEQ and TSK were associated with response to treatment in univariate regression analyses but not in multiple regression models that included low back predictors. LBP duration >4 years negatively impacted recovery. CONCLUSIONS Among this sample of older adults who received chiropractic manipulation and exercise, baseline self-efficacy and improvements in self-efficacy and kinesiophobia were individually associated with clinically important reductions in disability post-intervention, although not in adjusted models when LBP duration was included.
Collapse
|
9
|
Alhowimel AS, Alotaibi MA, Alamam DM, Alodaibi FA, Fritz JM. Attitudes and Beliefs of Primary Care Physicians Working in Saudi Arabia Regarding the Management of Low Back Pain: A Cross-Sectional Study. Int J Gen Med 2022; 14:10225-10233. [PMID: 35002292 PMCID: PMC8728917 DOI: 10.2147/ijgm.s343775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2021] [Accepted: 12/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Healthcare professionals’ beliefs and attitudes towards low back pain management play a significant role during treatment. This is a crucial aspect of primary care physicians working as a first point of contact for people seeking healthcare for low back pain. Aim To identify the beliefs and behaviors of frontline healthcare professionals (primary care physicians) working in the Riyadh region with regard to low back pain management. Methods A cross-sectional design was implemented, in which the Pain Attitude and Beliefs Scale (PABS) questionnaire was used along with a low back pain clinical vignette with some questions. The PABS assesses healthcare provider orientations toward low back pain with two subscales: biomedical and behavioral. In total, 400 primary care physicians working in the Riyadh region of Saudi Arabia were invited to participate. Results The responding primary care physicians (n = 72, response rate = 18%) provided an average score on the behavioral subscale (mean = 31.5±7.1) that was lower than that on the biomedical subscale (36.5±7.8) of the PABS. The lower scores in the biomedical subscale are associated with the using of clinical guidelines for low back pain management (χ2 (1) = 4.7, p = 0.03). Moreover, providing guideline-based advices regarding activity and work was more likely to come from those scoring above the mean in the behavioral subscale. Conclusion The results of this study show that Saudi Arabian primary care physicians manage their patients within a biomedical framework; there is some compliance to the current low back pain clinical guidelines among these physicians, with under/post-graduate education being needed for these professionals to adopt a more biopsychosocial framework during low back pain management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmed S Alhowimel
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Mazyad A Alotaibi
- Department of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, Alkharj, Saudi Arabia
| | - Dalyah M Alamam
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Faris A Alodaibi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Julie M Fritz
- Department of Physical Therapy and Athletic Training, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Alamam DM, Leaver A, Alsobayel HI, Moloney N, Lin J, Mackey MG. Low Back Pain-Related Disability Is Associated with Pain-Related Beliefs Across Divergent Non-English-Speaking Populations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PAIN MEDICINE 2021; 22:2974-2989. [PMID: 33624814 DOI: 10.1093/pm/pnaa430] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES This systematic review and meta-analysis examined relationships between low back pain (LBP)-related disability and pain beliefs, including pain catastrophizing, pain-related fear, self-efficacy, and back pain beliefs, in non-English-speaking populations. Additionally, the effects of selected cultural factors (i.e., language/geographic area) on the strength of relationships were examined. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS Nine databases were searched. Studies included observational or randomized control clinical trials. Eligible studies had to report estimates of the association between pain beliefs and disability. Pooled estimates of correlation coefficients were obtained through random-effects meta-analysis methods. RESULTS Fifty-nine studies, (n = 15,383) were included. Moderate correlations were identified between disability and pain self-efficacy (chronic LBP r = -0.51, P ≤ 0.001), between disability and pain catastrophizing (acute LBP r = 0.47, P ≤ 0.001; chronic LBP r = 0.44, P ≤ 0.001), and also between disability and pain-related fear (chronic LBP r = 0.41, P ≤ 0.001). Otherwise, weak correlations were identified between disability and most pain beliefs (range r = -0.23 to 0.35, P ≤ 0.001). Pooled correlation coefficients between disability and all pain beliefs (except the Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire-Work subscale) represent medium effects and suggest that lower disability was associated with greater pain self-efficacy, less pain-related fear, less catastrophic thinking, and less negative back pain beliefs about the nature and cause of back pain. Results were consistent across most language groups and geographic regions; few studies reported ethnicity or religion. DISCUSSION LBP-related disability was associated with pain-related beliefs, with consistency demonstrated for each pain belief construct across divergent non-English-speaking populations. Further research examining cultural factors, such as ethnicity or religion, and with a more diverse population is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dalyah M Alamam
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.,Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Andrew Leaver
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Hana I Alsobayel
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
| | - Niamh Moloney
- Department of Health Professions, Faculty of Medicine Health and Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.,THRIVE Physiotherapy, Guernsey, Channel Islands
| | - Jianhua Lin
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Martin G Mackey
- Faculty of Health Sciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mescouto K, Olson RE, Hodges PW, Setchell J. A critical review of the biopsychosocial model of low back pain care: time for a new approach? Disabil Rehabil 2020; 44:3270-3284. [PMID: 33284644 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2020.1851783] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Low back pain (LBP) is the leading cause of disability worldwide. Clinical research advocates using the biopsychosocial model (BPS) to manage LBP, however there is still no clear consensus regarding the meaning of this model in physiotherapy and how best to apply it. The aim of this study was to investigate how physiotherapy LBP literature enacts the BPS model. MATERIAL AND METHODS We conducted a critical review using discourse analysis of 66 articles retrieved from the PubMed and Web of Science databases. RESULTS Analysis suggest that many texts conflated the BPS with the biomedical model [Discourse 1: Conflating the BPS with the biomedical model]. Psychological aspects were almost exclusively conceptualised as cognitive and behavioural [Discourse 2: Cognition, behaviour, yellow flags and rapport]. Social context was rarely mentioned [Discourse 3: Brief and occasional social underpinnings]; and other broader aspects of care such as culture and power dynamics received little attention within the texts [Discourse 4: Expanded aspects of care]. CONCLUSION Results imply that multiple important factors such as interpersonal or institutional power relations, cultural considerations, ethical, and social aspects of health may not be incorporated into physiotherapy research and practice when working with people with LBP.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONWhen using the biopsychosocial model with patients with low back pain, researchers narrowly focus on biological and cognitive behavioural aspects of the model.Social and broader aspects such as cultural, interpersonal and institutional power dynamics, appear to be neglected by researchers when taking a biopsychosocial approach to the care of patients with low back pain.The biopsychosocial model may be inadequate to address complexities of people with low back pain, and a reworking of the model may be necessary.There is a lack of research conceptualising how physiotherapy applies the biopsychosocial model in research and practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karime Mescouto
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Rebecca E Olson
- School of Social Science, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Paul W Hodges
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jenny Setchell
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Moslem WM, Alrwaily M, Almarwani MM. Adherence to low back pain clinical practice guidelines by Saudi physical therapists: a cross-sectional study. Physiother Theory Pract 2020; 38:938-951. [DOI: 10.1080/09593985.2020.1806420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Walaa M. Moslem
- Physiotherapy Department, Prince Sultan Military Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
- Health Rehabilitation Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Muhammad Alrwaily
- Division of Physical Therapy, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, South Morgantown, WV, USA
- Department of Physical Therapy, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maha M. Almarwani
- Health Rehabilitation Sciences Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|