The Change in Sway and Neuromuscular Activity in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis Patients Pre and Post Surgery Compared With Controls

Early Postural Stability Changes in Patients Undergoing Correction of Spinal Deformity: A Prospective, Controlled Pilot Study

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Adult spinal deformity (ASD) is a prevalent condition often requiring surgical intervention. Improved outcomes among ASD patients have been shown to correlate with postoperative spinopelvic parameters, yet little is currently known about the role of postural stability and balance assessment for ASD patients.

PURPOSE

Explore early changes in postural stability following ASD correction.

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Sixteen adult patients who underwent four-level or greater posterolateral fusion to address global spinal malalignment and 14 healthy controls with no known spinal deformity nor surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Postural stability parameters, spinopelvic parameters preoperatively and postoperatively.

METHODS

Force plate balance assessment was completed where participants and healthy controls were instructed to stand with their hands at their sides, standing still, with eyes open. Center of pressure (COP), center of gravity (COG), and cone of economy (COE) parameters were analyzed with paired and unpaired t tests with an alpha of 0.05.

RESULTS

Preoperatively, ASD patients demonstrated more COG (P=0.0244) and sagittal and coronal head (P<0.05) sway than healthy controls. Postoperatively, ASD patients exhibited less COP (P=0.0308), COG (P=0.0276) and head (P=0.0345) sway. Compared to healthy controls, ASD patients postoperatively exhibited similar postural stability, aside from COP and COG sway amplitudes (P<0.05), and coronal head sway (P=0.0309). Pelvic incidence-lumbar lordosis and sagittal vertical axis improved from 16.2° to 4.8° (P<0.01) and 82.2 to 22.5 mm (P<0.01), respectively.

CONCLUSION

We report a novel early improvement in postural stability, comparable to healthy controls, following ASD correction that may be related to improved spinopelvic alignment. Force plate evaluation may be a useful tool for ASD patients postoperatively. Future clinical trials assessing the impact of postural stability on clinical and radiographic outcomes are warranted.

Scoliosis Research Society-22r score is affected by standing whole body sagittal alignment, age, and sex, but not by standing balance or skeletal muscle mass in healthy volunteers

PURPOSE

Aging and spinal disease impair standing whole body sagittal alignment (WBS alignment), which leads to stooping. When WBS alignment deteriorates, compensatory mechanisms are activated to maintain standing posture. Increase of the compensation impairs health-related quality of life (HRQOL). The purpose of this research was to determine whether postural factors, age, and sex affect HRQOL.

METHODS

This cross-sectional study evaluated the influence of WBS alignment, standing body sway (balance), skeletal muscle mass (SMM), aging, and sex on HRQOL in healthy volunteers (n = 150; mean age 40.9 years [20-76], 96 women). Age, sex, weight, height, and body mass index (BMI) were obtained. HRQOL was assessed with Scoliosis Research Society-22 (SRS-22r). WBS alignment and balance were measured by EOS imaging with simultaneous force plate measurement. SMM was measured using a medical body composition analyzer. Based on the bivariate analysis between the SRS-22r subtotal and all parameters, selected ten parameters were used for multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify affecting factors to SRS-22r.

RESULTS

Men had significantly higher weight, height, BMI, and SRS-22r score in all domains. The L4-S1 lumbar lordosis angle was greater in men, and pelvic tilt and knee hyperextension were greater in women. Women had a more stable standing posture, whereas men had significantly higher SMM values. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that age, sex, and TPA were identified as significant factors affecting SRS-22r.

CONCLUSIONS

In healthy volunteers, SRS-22r is affected by aging, sex (woman had a lower score), and sagittal malalignment. Neither Standing balance nor SMM, however, affect SRS-22r.4.

Functional Ability Classification Based on Moderate and Severe Kinesophobia and Demoralization Scores in Degenerative Spine Patients

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the relationship of fear avoidance and demoralization on gait and balance and determine a threshold score for the Tampa Scale for Kinesophobia (TSK) and the Demoralization Scale (DS) that identifies spine patients with gait and balance dysfunction amplified by underlying psychological factors.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Fear avoidance and demoralization are crucial components of mental health that impact the outcomes in spine surgery. However, interpreting their effect on patient function remains challenging. Further establishing this correlation and identifying a threshold of severity can aid in identifying patients in whom a portion of their altered gait and balance may be amplified by underlying psychologic distress.

METHODS

Four hundred five symptomatic spine patients were given the TSK and DS questionnaires. Patient's gait and balance were tested with a human motion capture system. A TSK score of 41 and a DS score of 30 were chosen as thresholds to classify moderate versus severe dysfunction based on literature and statistical analysis.

RESULTS

Higher TSK and DS scores were correlated with worse walking speed (P < 0.001), longer stride time (P = 0.001), decreased stride length (P < 0.048), and wider step width (<0.001) during gait as well as increased sway across planes (P = 0.001) during standing balance. When classified by TSK scores >41, patients with more severe fear avoidance had slower walking speed (P < 0.001), longer stride time (P = 0.001), shorter stride length (P = 0.004), increased step width (P < 0.001), and increased sway (P = 0.001) compared with their lower scoring counterparts. Similarly, patients with DS > 30 had slower walking speed (P = 0.012), longer stride time (P = 0.022), and increased sway (P = 0.003) compared with their lower scoring counterparts.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that fear avoidance and demoralization directly correlate with worsening gait and balance. Furthermore, patients with TSK > 41 and DS > 30 have more underlying psychological factors that contribute to significantly worse function compared with lower scoring peers. Understanding this relationship and using these guidelines can help identify and treat patients whose gait dysfunction may be amplified by psychologic distress.Level of Evidence: 3.

Reporting and tracking objective functional outcome measures: implementation of a summary report for gait and balance measures

The aim of this manuscript is to describe knowledge gaps in the literature, future directions, and emerging applications of gait and balance analysis in spine surgery with regard to functional outcomes measurement. Functional outcome measurement has been established as a useful clinical and research investigational tool in musculoskeletal disease. Evidence currently supports its use in the diagnosis, treatment, and outcome measurement of multiple musculoskeletal disease states, including spinal disease, and its usefulness continues to grow as literature develops. Gait and balance analysis has proven to be broadly applicable, but most clinicians remain unfamiliar and untrained in its usage. The logistical and communication barriers are also described with the potential solutions that are on the near horizon of research. This article describes our methodology for improving conveyance of functional outcome measures in spine surgery. Additionally, we provide a case example of an adult patient with spinal deformity who is examined pre and post operatively using our methodology.

Assessing the cone of economy in patients with spinal disease using only a force plate: an observational retrospective cohort study

STUDY DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort with multiple regression modeling.

OBJECTIVE

The aim is to develop a new method for estimating cone of economy (CoE) using a force plate rather than traditional motion capture.

BACKGROUND

Currently, most spinal deformity surgeons rely on static radiographic parameters for alignment, balance, and outcomes data alongside patient-reported outcome measures. The CoE, the stable region of upright posture, can be objectively measured to determine the efficiency and balance of the spine. Motion capture technology is currently used to collect data to calculate CoE, but this requires expensive and complex equipment, which is a barrier to widespread adoption and clinical use of CoE measurements. Force plates, which measure pressure, are less expensive and can be used in a clinical setting.

METHODS

Motion capture and a force plate were used to quantify the CoE of 473 subjects (423 spinal surgical candidates; 50 healthy controls; 271 females; age: 58.60 ± 15.27; height: 1.69 ± 0.13; weight: 81.07 ± 20.91), and a linear multiple regression model was used to predict CoE using force plate data in a human motion laboratory setting. Patients were required to stand erect with feet together and eyes open in their self-perceived balanced and natural position for a full minute while measures of sway and center of pressure (CoP) were recorded.

RESULTS

The CoP variable regression model successfully predicted CoE measurements. The variables that were used to predict vertical CoE were CoP coronal sway, CoP sagittal sway, and CoP total sway in several combinations. The coefficient of determination for the head total sway model indicated a 87.0% correlation (F(3,469) = 1044.14, p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination for the head sagittal sway model indicated a 69.2% correlation (F(3,469) = 351.70, p < 0.001). The coefficient of determination for the head coronal sway model indicated a 85.2% correlation (F(3,469) = 899.27, p < 0001).

CONCLUSION

Cone of economy was estimated from force plate data using center of pressure with high correlation without the use of motion capture in healthy controls and a variety of spine patients. This could lower the entry burden for measurement of the CoE in patients, enabling widespread use. This would provide surgeons objective global balance data, along with Haddas' CoE classification system, that could assist with surgical decision-making and facilitate objective monitoring surgical outcomes.

Cone of economy classification: evolution, concept of stability, severity level, and correlation to patient-reported outcome scores

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study OBJECTIVE: To determine a classification system for cone of economy (CoE) measurements that defines clinically significant changes in altered balance and to assess if the CoE measurements directly impacts patients reported outcome measures (PROMs). Preoperative functional data is a crucial component of determining patient disability and prognosis. The CoE has been theorized to be the foundation of biomechanical changes that leads to increased energy expenditure and disability in spine patients. PROMs have been developed to quantify the level of debilitation in spine patients but have various limitations.

METHODS

A total of 423 symptomatic adult patients with spine pathology completed a series of PROMs preoperatively including VAS, ODI, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Fear and Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and Demoralization (DS). Functional balance was tested in this group using a full-body reflective marker set to measure head and center of mass (CoM) sway.

RESULTS

PROMs scores were correlated with the magnitude of the CoE measurements. Patients were separated by the following proposed classification: CoM coronal sway > 1.5 cm, CoM sagittal sway > 3.0 cm, CoM total sway > 30.0 cm, head coronal sway > 3.0 cm, head sagittal sway > 6.0 cm, and head total sway > 60.0 cm. Significant differences were noted in the ODI (< 0.001), FABQ physical activity (< 0.001-0.009), DS (< 0.001-0.023), and TSK (< 0.001-0.032) across almost all planes of motion for both CoM and head sway. The ODI was most sensitive to the difference between groups across CoM and head sway planes with a mean ODI of 47.5-49.5 (p < 0.001) in the severe group versus 36.6-39.3 (p < 0.001) in the moderate group.

CONCLUSIONS

By classifying CoE measurements by the cutoffs proposed, clinically significant alterations in balance can be quantified. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that across spinal pathology, higher magnitude CoE and range of sway measurements correlate with worsening PROMs. The Haddas' CoE classification system in this study helps to identify patients that may benefit from surgery and guide their postoperative prognosis.

Does improved radiographic alignment truly enhance dynamic functional balance?

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective concurrent cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the relationship between radiographic alignment parameters and functional CoE measurements at 1 week before and at 3 months after realignment surgery in ADS patients. Adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) represents a significant healthcare burden with exceedingly high and increasing prevalence, particularly among the elderly. Radiographic alignment measures and patient-reported outcomes currently serve as the standard means to assess spinal alignment, deformity, and stability. Neurological examinations have served as qualitative measures for indicating muscle strength, motor deficits, and gait abnormalities. Three-dimensional motion analysis is increasingly being used to identify and measure gait and balance instability. Recently, techniques have been established to quantify balance characteristics described by Dubousset as the "cone of economy" (CoE). The relationship between radiographic alignment parameters and CoE balance measures of ADS patients before and after realignment surgery is currently unknown.

PATIENT SAMPLE

29 ADS patients treated with realignment surgery.

METHODS

Patients were evaluated at 1 week before realignment surgery and at their 3-month follow-up examination. During each evaluation, patients completed self-reported outcomes (visual analog scales for pain, Oswestry Disability Index, SRS22r) and a functional balance test. Mean changes in dependent measures from before to after surgery were compared using paired t tests. Pearson correlations were used to test for significant correlations between changes in radiographic and CoE measures.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were found for all patient-reported outcomes, in several radiographic measures, and in CoE measures. Improvements of scoliosis Cobb angle, coronal pelvic tilt, lumbar lordosis, and thoracic kyphosis showed significant correlations with CoE sway and total distance measures at both the center of mass and center of the head.

CONCLUSION

Improved radiographic alignment measures significantly correlated with improved CoE balance measures among ADS patients treated with realignment surgery at their three-month follow-up. These findings indicate that functional balance evaluations when used in conjunction with radiographic measurements, may provide a more robust and improved patient-specific sensitivity for postoperative assessments. CoE balance may represent a new measure of added value for surgical intervention of ADS.

The Effect of Surgical Decompression and Fusion on Functional Balance in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the effect of lumbar decompression and fusion surgery on balance and stability in patients with degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS) and compare them to controls.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

DLS is a condition in which one vertebra subluxates relative to an adjacent vertebra in the absence of a disruption in the neural arch. While the existing literature demonstrates that decompression and fusion can successfully alleviate pain and reduce disability in patients with DLS, no studies to date have used quantitative dynamic testing to determine the effect of surgery on cone of economy (CoE) measures in this patient population.

METHODS

Forty-five DLS patients performed a series of functional balance tests a week before and 3 months after surgery and were compared to 28 controls. The outcome measures included range of sway (RoS) and total sway for the center of mass (CoM) and head in the sagittal, coronal, and axial planes, along with leg and back Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), Fear/Avoidance Behavior Questionnaire (FABQ), Tampa Scale of Kinesophobia (TSK), and Demoralization scale.

RESULTS

RoS for the CoM (P < 0.005) and head (P < 0.017) decreased in all planes postoperatively. Reductions in CoM (P = 0.001) and head total sway (P = 0.001) were also observed after surgery. Furthermore, patients with DLS reported strong improvements in VAS low back (P = 0.001), VAS leg (P = 0.001), ODI (P = 0.001), FABQ Physical (P = 0.003), TSK (P = 0.001), and demoralization (P = 0.044) with surgical intervention. Although total sway was reduced after surgery, it did not return to the level of normal controls as demonstrated with more total sway of their CoM (P = 0.002) and head (P = 0.001) as well as more sagittal head RoS (P = 0.048).

CONCLUSION

This study confirms that surgical intervention for degenerative spondylolisthesis is effective at reducing disability, back and leg pain, demoralization, kinesiophobia, and fear-avoidance beliefs related to physical activity in patients with DLS. Furthermore, such patients exhibit a significantly more stable stance after surgery. However, balance parameters did not completely normalize by 3 months postoperatively.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Visual Verticality Perception in Spinal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients diagnosed with traumatic or non-traumatic spinal pain and idiopathic scoliosis frequently suffer from imbalance. The evaluation of the perception of verticality by means of visual tests emerges as a quick and easy tool for clinical management of the balance disorders. Several studies have assessed the visual perception of verticality in spinal diseases obtaining controversial results. The aim of our study is to analyze the perception of visual verticality in subjects with several spinal diseases in comparison with healthy subjects. A meta-analysis was carried out. PubMed MEDLINE, Scopus, WoS, CINAHL, and SciELO databases were searched until January 2020. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was calculated to analyze differences between patients and healthy controls. Fifteen studies with a total of 2052 patients were included. In comparison with healthy subjects, a misperception of verticality was found in patients with spinal pain when the perception of the verticality was assessed with the rod and frame test (SMD = 0.339; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.181, 0.497; p < 0.001). It seems that the perception of visual verticality is not altered in patients with idiopathic scoliosis (p = 0.294). The present meta-analysis shows a misperception of visual verticality only in patients with spinal pain.

What is actually happening inside the "cone of economy": compensatory mechanisms during a dynamic balance test

STUDY DESIGN

A nonrandomized, prospective, concurrent control cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To further develop cone of economy (CoE) measurements by identifying compensatory mechanisms at the extremes of the CoE and comparing balance control strategies in a group of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients with non-scoliotic controls. The CoE concept was first proposed by Dubousset and is frequently referred to when assessing balance in spinal deformity patients. Recently, a method that quantifies the CoE of individual patients through 3D video kinematic and electromyography data was developed. However, this method lacks measurements that describe the motor control strategies utilized by spinal disorder patients to maintain balance.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Twenty ADS patients and 15 non-scoliotic controls.

METHODS

All test subjects were fitted with a full body marker set. Each subject performed a series of functional balance tests (Romberg's with eyes opened) while being recorded in a human motion capture system. Three-dimensional CoE dimensions, range of sway (RoS), overall sway and lower extremity and trunk range of motion (RoM) were measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with ADS demonstrated greater overall sway and RoS in the sagittal and coronal planes compared to controls. Moreover, ADS patients presented with more hip flexion and trunk flexion at maximal points of sway and more ankle, knee, hip and trunk RoM when swaying in comparison with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

ADS patients have larger CoE dimensions and increased sway when compared to non-scoliotic controls. ADS patients rely on a hip balance control "strategy" and lower extremity RoM to maintain balance, which differed from control subjects. Unlike prior attempts to define compensatory mechanisms in ADS patients, the described technique utilizes dynamic, three-dimensional measurements to define what is occurring within the CoE. By expanding on prior CoE measurements, we were able to define a unique dynamic balance control strategy for each patient.