The Effect of Surgical Decompression and Fusion on Functional Balance in Patients With Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis

The prognostic value of fear-avoidance beliefs on postoperative pain and dysfunction for lumbar degenerative disk disease: a meta-analysis

The study aimed to explore the prognostic value of fear-avoidance beliefs (FABs) on postoperative pain and back-specific function for patients with lumbar degenerative disk disease (LDDD). FABs have been proven to be a predictorof pain and disability for patients with low back pain. However, whether FABs are a predictor of surgical outcomes for LDDD is a matter of debate. PubMed, Cochrane library, EMBASE, and EBSCO were searched for eligible cohort studies or secondary analyses of randomized controlled trials. Fixed-effect meta-analysis models were used to estimate odds ratios (OR) because of absent or low heterogeneity ( I ² < 50%). Subgroup analyses were conducted according to different follow-up durations. Forest plots were used for graphical representation. Six studies with a total of 829 participants were included in the meta-analyses. Risk of bias was high for three studies and moderate for the other three studies. For patients with LDDD, meta-analyses showed that FABs were a predictor of postoperative pain intensity [OR 2.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 2.76-3.00] and back-specific function (OR 3.13; 95% CI, 3.02-3.24). Patients with FABs are less likely to report improvement in pain (OR 2.56; 95% CI, 1.73-3.86) and function (OR 2.81; 95% CI, 2.57-3.07). In conclusion, FABs were a predictor of postoperative pain and back-specific function for patients with LDDD. This prognostic value is sustained for a long period after surgery (>12 months). Clinicians are advised to initiate targeted interventions for patients with FABs at different stages after surgery. Due to the limited number and low quality of included studies, the results of this meta-analysis should be interpreted with caution.

Research topics and hotspot trends of lumbar spondylolisthesis: A text-mining study with machine learning

Objectives

The study aimed to conduct a bibliometric analysis of publications concerning lumbar spondylolisthesis, as well as summarize its research topics and hotspot trends with machine-learning based text mining.

Methods

The data were extracted from the Web of Science Core Collection (WoSCC) database and then analyzed in Rstudio1.3.1 and CiteSpace5.8. Annual publication production and the top-20 productive authors over time were obtained. Additionally, top-20 productive journals and top-20 influential journals were compared by spine-subspecialty or not. Similarly, top-20 productive countries/regions and top-20 influential countries/regions were compared by they were developed countries/regions or not. The collaborative relationship among countries and institutions were presented. The main topics of lumbar spondylolisthesis were classified by Latent Dirichlet allocation (LDA) analysis, and the hotspot trends were indicated by keywords with strongest citation bursts.

Results

Up to 2021, a total number of 4,245 articles concerning lumbar spondylolisthesis were finally included for bibliometric analysis. Spine-subspecialty journals were found to be dominant in the productivity and the impact of the field, and SPINE, EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL and JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE were the top-3 productive and the top-3 influential journals in this field. USA, Japan and China have contributed to over half of the publication productivity, but European countries seemed to publish more influential articles. It seemed that developed countries/regions tended to produce more articles and more influential articles, and international collaborations mainly occurred among USA, Europe and eastern Asia. Publications concerning surgical management was the major topic, followed by radiographic assessment and epidemiology for this field. Surgical management especially minimally invasive technique for lumbar spondylolisthesis were the recent hotspots over the past 5 years.

Conclusions

The study successfully summarized the productivity and impact of different entities, which should benefit the journal selection and pursuit of international collaboration for researcher who were interested in the field of lumbar spondylolisthesis. Additionally, the current study may encourage more researchers joining in the field and somewhat inform their research direction in the future.

Balance effort, Cone of Economy, and dynamic compensatory mechanisms in common degenerative spinal pathologies

BACKGROUND

Changes in balance are common in individuals with spinal disorders and may cause falls. Balance efficiency, is the ability of a person to maintain their center of gravity with minimal neuromuscular energy expenditure, oftentimes referred to as Cone of Economy (CoE). CoE balance is defined by two sets of measures taken from the center of mass (CoM) and head: 1) the range-of-sway (RoS) in the coronal and sagittal planes, and 2) the overall sway distance. This allows spine caregivers to assess the severity of a patient's balance, balance pattern, and dynamic posture and record the changes following surgical intervention. Maintenance of balance requires coordination between the central nervous and musculoskeletal systems.

RESEARCH QUESTION

To discern differences in balance effort values between common degenerative spinal pathologies and a healthy control group.

METHODS

Three-hundred and forty patients with degenerative spinal pathologies: cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM), adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS), sacroiliac dysfunction (SIJD), degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis (DLS), single-level lumbar degeneration (LD), and failed back syndrome (FBS), and 40 healthy controls were recruited. A functional balance test was performed approximately one week before surgery recorded by 3D video motion capture.

RESULTS

Balance effort and compensatory mechanisms were found to be significantly greater in degenerative spinal pathologies patients compared to controls. Head and Center of Mass (CoM) overall sway ranged from 65.22 to 92.78 cm (p < 0.004) and 35.77-53.31 cm (p < 0.001), respectively in degenerative spinal pathologies patients and in comparison to controls (Head: 44.52 cm, CoM: 22.24 cm). Patients with degenerative spinal pathologies presented with greater trunk (1.61-2.98°, p < 0.038), hip (4.25-5.87°, p < 0.049), and knee (4.55-6.09°, p < 0.036) excursion when compared to controls (trunk: 0.95°, hip: 2.97°, and knee: 2.43°).

SIGNIFICANCE

The results of this study indicate that patients from a wide variety of degenerative spinal pathologies similarly exhibit markedly diminished balance (and compensatory mechanisms) as indicated by increased sway on a Romberg test and a larger Cone of Economy (CoE) as compared to healthy controls. Balance effort, as measured by overall sway, was found to be approximately double in patients with degenerative spinal pathologies compared to healthy matched controls. Clinicians can compare CoE parameters among symptomatic patients from the different cohorts using the Haddas' CoE classification system to guide their postoperative prognosis.

Cone of economy classification: evolution, concept of stability, severity level, and correlation to patient-reported outcome scores

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective cohort study OBJECTIVE: To determine a classification system for cone of economy (CoE) measurements that defines clinically significant changes in altered balance and to assess if the CoE measurements directly impacts patients reported outcome measures (PROMs). Preoperative functional data is a crucial component of determining patient disability and prognosis. The CoE has been theorized to be the foundation of biomechanical changes that leads to increased energy expenditure and disability in spine patients. PROMs have been developed to quantify the level of debilitation in spine patients but have various limitations.

METHODS

A total of 423 symptomatic adult patients with spine pathology completed a series of PROMs preoperatively including VAS, ODI, Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK), Fear and Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire (FABQ), and Demoralization (DS). Functional balance was tested in this group using a full-body reflective marker set to measure head and center of mass (CoM) sway.

RESULTS

PROMs scores were correlated with the magnitude of the CoE measurements. Patients were separated by the following proposed classification: CoM coronal sway > 1.5 cm, CoM sagittal sway > 3.0 cm, CoM total sway > 30.0 cm, head coronal sway > 3.0 cm, head sagittal sway > 6.0 cm, and head total sway > 60.0 cm. Significant differences were noted in the ODI (< 0.001), FABQ physical activity (< 0.001-0.009), DS (< 0.001-0.023), and TSK (< 0.001-0.032) across almost all planes of motion for both CoM and head sway. The ODI was most sensitive to the difference between groups across CoM and head sway planes with a mean ODI of 47.5-49.5 (p < 0.001) in the severe group versus 36.6-39.3 (p < 0.001) in the moderate group.

CONCLUSIONS

By classifying CoE measurements by the cutoffs proposed, clinically significant alterations in balance can be quantified. Furthermore, this study demonstrates that across spinal pathology, higher magnitude CoE and range of sway measurements correlate with worsening PROMs. The Haddas' CoE classification system in this study helps to identify patients that may benefit from surgery and guide their postoperative prognosis.

What is actually happening inside the "cone of economy": compensatory mechanisms during a dynamic balance test

STUDY DESIGN

A nonrandomized, prospective, concurrent control cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To further develop cone of economy (CoE) measurements by identifying compensatory mechanisms at the extremes of the CoE and comparing balance control strategies in a group of adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS) patients with non-scoliotic controls. The CoE concept was first proposed by Dubousset and is frequently referred to when assessing balance in spinal deformity patients. Recently, a method that quantifies the CoE of individual patients through 3D video kinematic and electromyography data was developed. However, this method lacks measurements that describe the motor control strategies utilized by spinal disorder patients to maintain balance.

PATIENT SAMPLE

Twenty ADS patients and 15 non-scoliotic controls.

METHODS

All test subjects were fitted with a full body marker set. Each subject performed a series of functional balance tests (Romberg's with eyes opened) while being recorded in a human motion capture system. Three-dimensional CoE dimensions, range of sway (RoS), overall sway and lower extremity and trunk range of motion (RoM) were measured and analyzed.

RESULTS

Patients with ADS demonstrated greater overall sway and RoS in the sagittal and coronal planes compared to controls. Moreover, ADS patients presented with more hip flexion and trunk flexion at maximal points of sway and more ankle, knee, hip and trunk RoM when swaying in comparison with controls.

CONCLUSIONS

ADS patients have larger CoE dimensions and increased sway when compared to non-scoliotic controls. ADS patients rely on a hip balance control "strategy" and lower extremity RoM to maintain balance, which differed from control subjects. Unlike prior attempts to define compensatory mechanisms in ADS patients, the described technique utilizes dynamic, three-dimensional measurements to define what is occurring within the CoE. By expanding on prior CoE measurements, we were able to define a unique dynamic balance control strategy for each patient.