Increasing Fusion Rate Between 1 and 2 Years After Instrumented Posterolateral Spinal Fusion and the Role of Bone Grafting

Interscapular Pain after Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: Does Zygapophyseal Joints over Distraction Play a Role?

Introduction: Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) for cervical disc herniation (CDH) is commonly performed. Specific post-operative complications include dysphagia, dysphonia, cervicalgia, adjacent segment disorder, cage subsidence, and infections. However, interscapular pain is commonly reported by these patients after surgery, although its mechanisms have not been clarified yet. Methods: This retrospective series of 31 patients undergoing ACDF for CDH at a single Academic Hospital. Baseline and post-operative clinical, radiological, and surgical data were analyzed. The linear regression analysis was conducted to identify any factor independently influencing the incidence rate of post-operative interscapular pain. Results: The mean age was 57.6 ± 10.8 years, and the M:F ratio was 2.1. Pre-operative mean VAS-arm was 7.15 ± 0.81 among the 20 patients reporting brachialgia, and mean VAS-neck was 4.36 ± 1.43 among those 9 patients reporting cervicalgia. At 1 month, interscapular pain was still reported by 8 out of the 17 patients who experienced it post-operatively, and it was recovered in all patients after 2 months. The regression analysis showed that interscapular pain was not directly associated with age (p = 0.74), gender (p = 0.46), smoking status (p = 0.44), diabetes (0.42), pre-operative brachialgia (p = 0.21) or cervicalgia (p = 0.48), symptoms duration (p = 0.13), baseline VAS-arm (p = 0.11), VAS-neck (p = 0.93), or mJOA (p = 0.63) scores, or disc height modification (p = 0.90). However, the post-operative increase in the mean zygapophyseal joint rim distance was identified as an independent factor in determining interscapular pain (p = 0.02). Conclusions: Our study revealed that the onset of interscapular pain following ACDF may be determined by over distraction of the zygapophyseal joint rim. Then, proper sizing of prosthetic implants could reduce this painful complication.

Spontaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion Following Posterolateral Fusion Surgery: A Retrospective Analysis of 5-Year Data

Background

Posterolateral fusion (PLF) surgery is frequently performed for a range of spinal disorders. However, spontaneous lumbar interbody fusion (SLIF) following PLF surgery is yet to be reported. Thus, we evaluated the incidence and characteristics of SLIF among patients that underwent PLF surgery.

Methods

This retrospective study involved review of electronic medical records of 121 adult patients who underwent primary lumbar decompression with instrumented PLF between 2006 and 2011. The available radiographs of L2-S1 region were assessed for SLIF and PLF. At 1 year, modified Lee's and Lenke's criteria were used to assess SLIF and PLF, respectively. Differences between the patients in the fusion and non-fusion groups were evaluated.

Results

At 1-year follow-up, 28.93 and 87.61% patients had SLIF and PLF, respectively. Moreover, 27.27% patients had both SLIF and PLF. L4-L5 (n = 13) was the most common segment involved in SLIF. SLIF rate was significantly greater among young adults (p value = 0.001), and those with no pre-operative instability (p value = 0.003) as well as who underwent pedicular fixation instrumented PLF surgery (p value < 0.0001). While, PLF was significantly greater in patients who did not undergo discectomy (p value = 0.049). SLIF was not significantly associated with sex, age groups, discectomy status, and level of PLF surgery (all p values > 0.05). PLF was not significantly associated with sex, age groups, pre-operative instability, type of instrumentation, and level of PLF surgery (all p values > 0.05). There was no significant association between patients with SLIF and PLF (p value = 0.155).

Conclusions

More than a quarter of patients developed SLIF and majority of them had PLF. SLIF was significantly associated with younger age at surgery and use of pedicular fixation instruments.Level of Evidence III; retrospective cohort study.

Biodegradable biomaterials in orthopedic surgery: A narrative review of the current evidence

BACKGROUND

Biomaterials are routinely used in orthopedic surgery to fill bone defects, improve bone healing, and as degradable fixation material. A wide range of materials are currently in use, and the materials are chosen according to their bioactive properties. Osteoinductive materials stimulate bone healing by promoting osteogenesis. Osteoconductive materials facilitate bone growth on the surface of the material. Despite the many materials in use and an increasing number of published studies, randomized controlled trials on the subject are scarce.

METHODS

This review aims to summarize the history of biodegradable biomaterials and also the published level I evidence currently available on orthopedic biomaterials.

RESULTS

Most of the studies have been superiority trials with non-significant differences compared to conventional treatment options, confirming that several biomaterials are suitable treatment options for multiple indications including bone and/or tendon fixation, filling bone defects, and spinal fusion. Biomaterials help to avoid donor site complications associated with autogenous bone grafts and often eliminate the need for implant removal. However, the surgical technique may in some cases be more demanding than with conventional methods. Careful consideration of the pros and cons is therefore recommended in clinical practice.

CONCLUSION

Biodegradable biomaterials complement the range of available treatment options in several fields of orthopedic surgery. However, some biomaterials performed worse than expected and were not recommended for clinical use, emphasizing the need for high-quality randomized trials. It is also noteworthy that several trials included only a limited number of patients, rendering the interpretation of the results of these underpowered studies challenging.

Is local autogenous morselized bone harvested from decompression through a posterior-transforaminal approach sufficient for single-level interbody fusion in the lower lumbar spine?

BACKGROUND

To determine the volume and applicability of local autogenous morselized bone (LAMB) harvested and used during posterior-transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (P-TLIF) in the lower lumbar spine.

METHODS

Clinical and radiographic data of 147 patients (87 males) undergoing P-TLIF from January 2017 to December 2019 for lumbar degenerative diseases were retrospectively analyzed. Computed tomography was used to assess the fusion status (at 6 months, 1 year, and the last follow-up postoperatively), restored disc height, graft fusion area and volume, and the minimum required bone volume (MRBV). Clinical outcomes of P-TLIF were assessed using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and visual analog scale (VAS) for low back pain (LBP) and leg pain (LP).

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 28.4 ± 4.49 months. The patient's age and diagnosis were correlated to the volume and weight of LAMB (mean volume and weight: 3.50 ± 0.45 mL and 3.88 ± 0.47 g, respectively). The ratio of actual fusion area to the total disc endplate and the ratio of actual fusion volume to the total volume of the disc space were > 40%. MRBV ranged from 1.83 ± 0.48 cm³ to 2.97 ± 0.68 cm³. The proportion of grade 4 or 5 fusions increased from 60.6% at 6 months to 96.6% at the last follow-up. The ODI, VAS-LP, and VAS-LBP scores significantly improved after surgery and remained unchanged during the follow-up.

CONCLUSION

When combined with a cage, the volume of LAMB harvested from decompression through the unilateral approach at a single-level is sufficient to achieve a solid interbody fusion in the lower lumbar spine with excellent clinical and radiographic outcomes.

A Pre-clinical Standard Operating Procedure for Evaluating Orthobiologics in an In Vivo Rat Spinal Fusion Model

The rat animal model is a cost effective and reliable model used in spinal pre-clinical research. Complications from various surgical procedures in humans often arise that were based on these pre-clinical animal models. Therefore safe and efficacious pre-clinical animal models are needed to establish continuity into clinical trials. A Standard Operating Procedure (SOP) is a validated method that allows researchers to safely and carefully replicate previously successful surgical techniques. Thus, the aim of this study is to describe in detail the procedures involved in a common rat bilateral posterolateral intertransverse spinal fusion SOP used to test the efficacy and safety different orthobiologics using a collagen-soaked sponge as an orthobiologic carrier. Only two orthobiologics are currently FDA approved for spinal fusion surgery which include recombinant bone morphogenetic protein 2 (rhBMP-2), and I-FACTOR. While there are many additional orthobiologics currently being tested, one way to show their safety profile and gain FDA approval, is to use well established pre-clinical animal models. A preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative surgical setup including specific anesthesia and euthanasia protocols are outlined. Furthermore, we describe different postoperative methods used to validate the spinal fusion SOP, which include μCT analysis, histopathology, biomechanical testing, and blood analysis. This SOP can help increase validity, transparency, efficacy, and reproducibly in future rat spinal fusion surgery procedures.

An in-vitro model to test the influence of immune cell secretome on MSC osteogenic differentiation

Immune cells and their soluble factors have an important role in the bone healing process. Modulation of the immune response, therefore, offers a potential strategy to enhance bone formation. To investigate the influence of the immune system on osteogenesis, we developed and applied an in-vitro model that incorporates both innate and adaptive immune cells. Human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) were isolated and cultured for 24 hours and subsequently stimulated with immune-modulatory agents; C-class CpG oligodeoxynucleotide (CpG ODN C), Polyinosinic acid-polycytidylic acid Poly(I:C), and lipopolysaccharide (LPS); all pathogen recognition receptor agonists, and that target Toll-like receptors TLR9, -3, and -4, respectively. The conditioned medium obtained from PBMCs after 24 hours was used to investigate its effects on the metabolic activity and osteogenic differentiation capacity of human bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs). Conditioned media from unstimulated PBMCs did not affect the metabolic activity and osteogenic differentiation capacity of MSCs. The conditioned medium from CpG ODN C and LPS stimulated PBMCs increased alkaline phosphatase activity of MSCs by approximately 3-fold as compared to the unstimulated control, whereas Poly(I:C) conditioned medium did not enhance ALP activity of MSCs. Moreover, direct stimulation of MSCs with the immune-modulatory stimuli did not result in increased alkaline phosphatase activity. These results demonstrate that soluble factors present in conditioned medium from PBMCs stimulated with immune-modulatory factors enhance osteogenesis of MSCs. This in-vitro model can serve as a tool in screening immune-modulatory stimulants from a broad variety of immune cells for (indirect) effects on osteogenesis and also to identify soluble factors from multiple immune cell types that may modulate bone healing.

Ceramic bone graft substitute vs autograft in XLIF: a prospective randomized single-center evaluation of radiographic and clinical outcomes

Purpose of the Study

The objective of this prospective, parallel, randomized, single-center study is to evaluate the clinical success of a commercial ceramic bone graft substitute (CBGS) for autograft in eXtreme Lateral Interbody Fusion (XLIF) procedures. Please confirm if the author names are presented accurately and in the correct sequence (given name, middle name/initial, family name). Author 1 Given name: [Cristiano Magalhães], Last name [Menezes]. Author 2 Given name: [Gabriel Carvalho], Last name [Lacerda]. Author 5 Given name: [Erica Godinho], Last name [Menezes]. Also, kindly confirm the details in the metadata are correct.yes

Methods

Forty-five adult subjects were consecutively enrolled and randomized into a single-level XLIF procedure using either CBGS or iliac crest bone graft autograft (30 and 15 subjects, respectively). The primary outcome was fusion rate at 12, 18, and 24 months. Secondary outcomes were pain and disability measured by HRQOL questionnaires. Kindly check and confirm whether the corresponding author and his corresponding affiliations is correctly identified.yes

Results

The fusion rates for both CBGS and autograft groups at the 24-month follow-up were 96.4% and 100%, respectively. For the CBGS group, mean ODI, mean back pain, and mean worst leg pain significantly improved at the 24-month follow-up by 76.7% (39.9–9.3), 77.6% (7.3–1.6), and 81.3% (5.1–1.0), respectively. For the autograft group, mean ODI, mean back pain, and mean worst leg pain significantly improved during the same time period by 77.1% (35.9–8.2), 75.6% (6.1–1.5), and 86.0% (6.6–0.9), respectively (all time points between groups, p < 0.05).

Conclusion

The results of this prospective, randomized study support the use of CBGS as a standalone bone graft substitute for autograft in single-level XLIF surgery. The clinical performance and safety outcomes reported here are consistent with published evidence on CBGS. Improvements in patient-reported back pain, leg pain, and disability outcomes were comparable between the CBGS and autograft groups.

Circumferential Fusion Employing Transforaminal vs. Direct Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion—A Potential Impact on Implants Stability

Background

Different fusion techniques were introduced in clinical practice in patients with lumbar degenerative disc disease, however, no evidence has been provided on the advantages of one technique over another.

The Objective of This Study

Is to assess the potential impact of circumferential fusion employing transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) vs. direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) on pedicle screw stability.

Materials and Methods

This is a single-center prospective evaluation of consecutive 138 patients with degenerative instability of lumbar spinal segments. Either conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) with posterior fusion or direct lateral interbody fusion (DLIF) using cages of standard dimensions, were applied. The conventional open technique was used to supplement TLIF with pedicle screws while percutaneous screw placement was used in patients treated with DLIF. The duration of the follow-up accounted for 24 months. Signs of pedicle screws loosening (PSL) and bone union after fusion were assessed by the results of CT imaging. Fisher‘s exact test was used to assess the differences in the rate of CT loosening and revision surgery because of implant instability. Logistic regression was used to assess the association between potential factors and complication rate.

Results

The rate of PSL detected by CT and relevant revision surgery in groups treated with TLIF and DLIF accounted for 25 (32.9%) vs. 2 (3.2%), respectively, for the former and 9 (12.0%) vs. 0 (0%) for the latter (p &lt; 0.0001 and p = 0.0043) respectively. According to the results of logistic regression, a decrease in radiodensity values and a greater number of levels fused were associated with a rise in PSL rate. DLIF application in patients with radiodensity below 140 HU was associated with a considerable decrease in complication rate. Unipolar or bipolar pseudoarthrosis in patients operated on with TLIF was associated with a rise in PSL rate while patients treated with DLIF tolerate delayed interbody fusion formation. In patients treated with TLIF supplementary total or partial posterior fusion resulted in a decline in PSL rate.

Conclusion

Even though the supplementary posterior fusion may considerably reduce the rate of PSL in patients treated with TLIF, the application of DLIF provide greater stability resulting in a substantial decline in PSL rate and relevant revision surgery.

Long-Term Outcome After Midline Lumbar Fusion for the Treatment of Lumbar Spine Instability Due to Degenerative Disease

BACKGROUND

Midline lumbar fusion (MIDLF) is one promising new surgical technique that has been developed to minimize perioperative damage to the paravertebral stabilizing musculotendinous system. The aim of this study was to assess long-term clinical and radiological effects of MIDLF.

METHODS

This prospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent MIDLF for degenerative spinal instability. Clinical and radiological examinations were performed before and after surgery. Perioperative and postoperative complications were recorded. Follow-up was 2 years. P ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The study included 64 patients (mean age 58.9 ± 10.7 years; 41 women [64.1%]). The most frequent indication for MIDLF was degenerative spondylolisthesis grade I (28 cases [43.8%]); the prevalent spinal segment to be fused was L4-L5 (35 cases [54.7%]). Mean duration of surgery was 148.2 ± 28.9 minutes. Relief of low back pain and leg pain was significant and stable in the postoperative period as assessed by visual analog scale (P < 0.001). Of patients, 86.9% reported fair, good, or excellent outcomes in terms of pain relief based on MacNab score 2 years after surgery. Patients' level of function in activities of daily living improved significantly based on Oswestry Disability Index score: from 66.8 ± 9.8 before surgery to 33.9 ± 16.5 2 years after surgery (P < 0.001). X-rays and computed tomography at 12 months showed interbody fusion in 46 cases (73.4%), inconclusive results in 13 cases (20.3%), and no fusion in 4 cases (6.3%). No damage to neural or vascular structures and no failure of hardware or screw loosening were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

MIDLF is a safe, efficient method for surgical treatment of lumbar spine instability. Its limited invasiveness contributes to better preservation of paravertebral muscles and enhanced postoperative spinal stability.