Strategy for the Practice of Spine Oncological Surgery During the Covid-19 Pandemic

Delay of Surgery for Spinal Metastasis due to the COVID-19 Outbreak Affected Patient Outcomes

OBJECTIVE

The present study is to analyze the effects of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID 2019) outbreak and the subsequent lockdown on the outcomes of spinal metastasis patients.

METHODS

The study was a retrospective analysis of data from a prospective cohort study. All patients underwent surgical intervention for spinal metastases between January 2019 and December 2021 and had at least 3 months of postoperative follow-up. The primary outcome was overall mortality during the 4 different stages (pre-COVID-19 era, COVID-19 pandemic except in Taiwan, national lockdown, lifting of the lockdown). The secondary outcomes were the oncological severity scores, medical/surgical accessibility, and patient functional outcome during the 4 periods as well as survival/mortality.

RESULTS

A total of 233 patients were included. The overall mortality rate was 41.20%. During the Taiwan lockdown, more patients received palliative surgery than other surgical methods, and no total en bloc spondylectomy was performed. The time from surgeon visit to operation was approximately doubled after the COVID-19 outbreak in Taiwan (75.97, 86.63, 168.79, and 166.91 hours in the 4 periods, respectively). The estimated survival probability was highest after the national lockdown was lifted and lowest during the lockdown. In the multivariate analysis, increased risk of mortality was observed with delay of surgery, with emergency surgery having a higher risk with delays above 33 hours, urgent surgery (below 59 and above 111 hours), and elective surgery (above 332 hours).

CONCLUSION

The COVID-19 pandemic and related policies have altered daily clinical practice and negatively impacted the survival of patients with spinal metastases.

Impact of the COVID-19 on the surgical management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma: A systematic review

Background

The COVID-19 pandemic had greatly and negatively impacted health services including the management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma. As disease progression is time-sensitive, decision taken by the oncology orthopedic surgeon on performing surgical treatment determines the patient outcome. On the other hand, as the world tried to control the spread of COVID-19 infection, treatment re-prioritization based on urgency level had to be done which consequently affect treatment provision for sarcoma patients. Patient and clinician's concern regarding the outbreak have also inflicted on treatment decision making. A systematic review was thought to be necessary to summarize the changes seen in managing primary malignant bone and soft tissue tumors.

Methods

We performed this systematic review in line with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 Statement. The review protocol had been registered on PROSPERO with submission number CRD42022329430. We included studies which reported primary malignant tumor diagnosis and its surgical intervention from March 11th, 2020 onwards. The main outcome is to report changes implemented by different centers around the world in managing primary malignant bone tumors surgically in response to the pandemic. Three electronic medical databases were scoured and by applying eligibility criteria. Individual authors evaluated the articles' quality and risk of bias using the Newcastle-Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale other instruments developed by JBI of the University of Adelaide. The overall quality assessment of this systematic review was self-evaluated using the AMSTAR (Assessing the Methodological Quality of Systematic Reviews) Checklist.

Results

There were 26 studies included in the review with various study designs, conveyed in almost all continents. The outcomes from this review are change in surgery time, change in surgery type, and change in surgery indication in patients with primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma. Surgery timing has been experiencing delay since the pandemic occurred, including delay in the multidisciplinary forum, which were all related to lockdown regulations and travel restrictions. For surgery type, limb amputation was preferred compared to limb-salvage procedures due to shorter duration and simpler reconstruction with better control of malignancy. Meanwhile, the indications for surgical management are still based on the patient's demographics and disease stages. However, some would stall surgery regardless of malignancy infiltration and fracture risks which are indication for amputation. As expected, our meta-analysis showed higher post-surgical mortality in patients with malignant bone and soft tissue sarcoma during the COVID-19 pandemic with odds ratio of 1.14.

Conclusion

Surgical management of patients with primary bone and soft tissue sarcoma has seriously been affected due to adjustments to the COVID-19 pandemic. Other than institutional restrictions to contain the infection, patient and clinician's decisions to postpone treatment due to COVID-19 transmission concern were also impactful in treatment course. Delay in surgery timing has caused higher risk of worse surgical outcome during the pandemic, which is aggravated if the patient is infected by COVID-19 as well. As we transition into a post-COVID-19 pandemic period, we expect patients to be more lenient in returning for their treatment but by then disease progression might have taken place, resulting in worse overall prognosis. Limitation to this study were few assumptions made in the synthesis of numerical data and meta-analysis only for changes in surgery time outcome and lack of intervention studies included.

Cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic: Choosing between the devil and the deep blue sea

COVID-19 was declared a "Public Health Emergency of International Concern" in March 2020. Since then, drastic measures were implemented to reduce the virus spread. These measures prevented cancer patients from receiving prompt medical care. A delay in testing and treating cancer patients is thought to protect them from serious COVID-19 complications but exposes them at the same time to the risk of disease progression and cancer related mortality. Healthcare providers are therefore facing the dilemma of choosing between two unpleasant scenarios. To shed light upon the matter, we present in this review article, based on an extensive search of the literature, an overview of the delay in the management of cancer patients, possible contributors to this delay and its benefits and risks on cancer patients' health.