Hounsfield Unit for Assessing Vertebral Bone Quality and Asymmetrical Vertebral Degeneration in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

MRI-based pedicle bone quality score: correlation to quantitative computed tomography bone mineral density and its role in quantitative assessment of osteoporosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Bone quality in the pedicle region generally determines screw pullout strength, insertion torque, and vertebral body loading characteristics. Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA), as the gold standard for evaluating bone mineral density (BMD), cannot measure the BMD of specific parts, such as pedicle, and DEXA is limited in many ways. Recent studies have shown a correlation between the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score and BMD measured using DEXA or quantitative computed tomography (QCT). However, no studies have been reported on the MRI-based pedicle bone quality (PBQ) score. Moreover, few studies have investigated the relationship between MRI-based PBQ and osteoporosis.

PURPOSE

To create a new site-specific MRI-based PBQ assessment method and assess its diagnostic capacity in patients with normal BMD and osteopenia/osteoporosis.

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

A retrospective study.

PATIENT SAMPLE

A total of 156 patients underwent lumbar fusion surgery for chronic low back pain at our hospital between 2021 and 2022, with lumbar QCT and T1-weighted MRI performed before surgery.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Correlation of the PBQ score with QCT BMD, and the association between the PBQ score and presence of osteopenia/osteoporosis.

METHODS

BMD of the lumbar was calculated as the mean BMD of the L1 and L2 vertebral bodies on the basis of asynchronous QCT measurements. The PBQ score, which is the average of the bone quality values of both pedicles on the basis of site-specific T1-weighted sagittal MRI images, was calculated by dividing the median signal intensity of the L1-L4 pedicles by the signal intensity of the cerebrospinal fluid at the L3 level. The interobserver reliability of the PBQ score was assessed using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). A receiver operating characteristic curve was drawn, and the area under the curve (AUC) was calculated to assess the predictive performance of PBQ for osteoporosis. The PBQ score was compared with QCT BMD, as the gold standard, using Pearson correlation analysis.

RESULTS

In total, 156 patients participated in this study, including 51 in the Normal BMD group and 105 in the osteopenia/osteoporosis group. The PBQ score in the osteopenia/osteoporosis group was significantly higher than that in the normal BMD group (3.19±0.55 vs 2.84±0.51, p<.001). The VBQ and PBQ scores were calculated by 2 authors and were in good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.949 and 0.929, respectively). Pearson's test showed a significant negative correlation between PBQ and QCT BMD (r=-0.4887, p<.001). The optimal cutoff PBQ score to differentiate patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis from those with normal BMD was 3.160, with a sensitivity of 66.7%, specificity of 72.5%, and AUC of 0.776. The PBQ score correlated more strongly with QCT BMD (r=-0.4887) than VBQ (r=-0.4078).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, we propose a novel, MRI-based pedicle-specific bone quality score. This is the first study to investigate the relationship between the PBQ score and QCT BMD. The PBQ score showed diagnostic utility, differentiating between patients with osteopenia/osteoporosis and those with normal BMD (AUC=0.776), and the PBQ score correlated more strongly with QCT BMD than VBQ.

Novel MRI-Based Pedicle Bone Quality Score Independently Predicts Pedicle Screw Loosening after Degenerative Lumbar Fusion Surgery

Pedicle screw loosening after posterior lumbar fusion is associated with poor bone quality, which often determines screw pull-out strength, insertion torque, and vertebral body loading characteristics. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score were associated with poor bone quality. Current evidence suggests that pedicle bone quality (PBQ) has a greater impact on screw stability. However, the correlation between MRI-based PBQ score and screw loosening has not been reported.

PURPOSE

To introduce and evaluate an MRI-based PBQ score to determine its effectiveness in predicting pedicle screw loosening following lumbar fusion surgery.

METHODS

The retrospective study analyzed 244 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with pedicle screws between December 2017 and December 2021, with CT and MRI imaging before surgery. Data collected included patient demographics and preoperative radiological data. Radiographic screw loosening was measured at 12 months postoperatively. Clinical assessments included pain visual analog scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores. The PBQ score was measured using MRI scans. We use univariate analysis for preliminary screening of the risk factors of screw loosening. Subsequent analysis involved multivariate logistic regression to identify independent predictive factors for screw loosening. We constructed the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve to ascertain the discriminative capacity of the PBQ score. The area under the curve (AUC) quantified its predictive accuracy. Additionally, we evaluated the association between PBQ score and screw loosening using Spearman's correlation analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 244 patients who underwent PLIF with pedicle screw fixation participated in this study, including 35 in the loosening group and 209 in the non-loosening group. PBQ score in the loosening group was significantly higher than that in the non-loosening group. On multivariate logistic regression, the higher PBQ score (OR = 8.481, 95% CI: 3.158-22.774; p < 0.001) and the lower mean Hounsfield unit (HU) value of L1-4 (OR = 0.967, 95% CI 0.951-0.984; p < 0.001) were the variables that significantly predicted screw loosening. The AUC for the PBQ score and HU value were 0.751 (95% CI: 0.673-0.828) and 0.702 (95% CI: 0.612-0.791). The PBQ score optimal cutoff to differentiate patients with loosening and with non-loosening was calculated as 3.045 with a sensitivity of 85.7% and specificity of 76.9%, while the optimal cutoff of the HU value was 151.5 with a sensitivity of 64.6% and specificity of 89.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The association between the PBQ score and the propensity for lumbar pedicle screw loosening was found to be substantial. As a predictive measure, the PBQ score outperformed the HU value in forecasting the likelihood of screw loosening post-posterior lumbar fusion.

Asymmetric Osteopenia in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Based on Hounsfield Unit of Computed Tomography

Purpose

To characterize the asymmetrical loss of bone mass and identify the association between scoliosis and osteopenia in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS).

Methods

Demographic information, Cobb angle, and Hounsfield unit (HU) of the neutral vertebra (NV) and apical vertebra (apex) of the major curve were collected retrospectively in 54 AIS patients. For 84 control subjects, HU values were measured at T12 and L5. Propensity score matching was performed to balance the interference of age and BMI.

Results

In the AIS group, the concave and convex lateral HU of the NV and the convex lateral HU of the apex were negatively correlated with the Cobb angle. The AIS patients had lower bilateral HU. The mean HU and the apex-convex HU were also lower in the AIS group, while the apex-concave HU was slightly higher. After matching, the apex-convex HU of the AIS group remained lower, while the apex-concave HU was higher.

Conclusion

Patients with AIS exhibit osteopenia, particularly on the convex side. The severity of scoliosis was found to be directly proportional to the severity of bone loss and the degree of bilateral osteopenia asymmetry. Appropriate intervention for bone loss may be able to curb the progression of scoliosis.

S1 vertebral bone quality score independently predicts pedicle screw loosening following surgery in patients with adult degenerative scoliosis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score is an effective predictor of pedicle screw loosening after lumbar fusion surgery and has been recognized as a valuable tool for assessing preoperative bone quality. Due to the lateral curvature of lumbar spine of degenerative scoliosis, accurate measurement of VBQ score by conventional measurement methods that capture MRI signal intensity at L1-4 may be limited under certain conditions. To this end, a new simplified S1 VBQ score method has been proposed, which is comparable to the previous L1-4 VBQ score or S1 Hounsfield unit (HU) value, and has high accuracy and reliability.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the predictive value of MRI-based S1 VBQ score for pedicle screw loosening following surgery for adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS).

STUDY DESIGN/SETTING

Retrospective single-center cohort.

PATIENT SAMPLE

We reviewed 92 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) with pedicle screw fixation for ADS between January 2017 and January 2020.

OUTCOME MEASURES

Association between S1 VBQ score and pedicle screw loosening following surgery for ADS.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the records of all patients who performed PLIF between January 2017 and January 2020. The clear zone around pedicle screws≥1 mm can be identified as screw loosening. The S1 VBQ score is calculated from the S1 central-based noncontrast T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The signal intensity (SI) of the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was then measured using ROI placed at the L3 level to normalize the results. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for screw loosening. Then, constructed a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and determined the threshold (cut-off) of VBQ score with high sensitivity and specificity based on Youden Index.

RESULTS

A total of 92 patients were included, including 34 males and 58 females. The mean age of the patients was 61.23±1.23 years old. At 1-year follow-up, the screw loosening rate was 56.5% (52/92). The age and levels of fixation were higher in the loosening group than in the nonloosening group (p=.036, p=.025). Patients in the loosening group had a greater VBQ score compared to patients in the nonloosening group (3.31±0.41 vs 3.01±0.28, p=.001). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that advanced age (OR, 1.090; 95% CI 1.005-1.183; p=.039) and higher VBQ score (OR, 5.778; 95% CI 2.889-16.177; p=.001) were independent risk factors for screw loosening. In addition, the ROC curve were created to assess the role of VBQ score as predictors of screw loosening with a diagnostic accuracy of 74.6% (95% CI 64.2%-85.1%).The most suitable threshold for the VBQ score as determined by the Youden Index was 3.175 (sensitivity: 76.0%, specificity: 83.3%).

CONCLUSIONS

Higher S1 VBQ score was significantly associated with pedicle screw loosening following surgery for ADS. The S1 VBQ score can be used as an effective preoperative predictor, which has the potential clinical application.

Comparative Analysis of the 3 Cervical Vertebral Bone Quality (C-VBQ) Score Methodologies and Their Correlations to the Lumbar Vertebral Bone Quality (VBQ) Score

OBJECTIVE

Common complications after spinal fusion, such as pseudoarthrosis, cage subsidence, or instrumentation failure, are affected by patients' bone quality. The cervical-vertebral bone quality (C-VBQ) score, a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based adaption of the lumbar vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score, was developed by 3 separate research groups simultaneously to evaluate bone quality in cervical spinal fusion patients. We present the first analysis comparing these scoring methods to the well-validated VBQ score.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of data for consecutive patients who underwent spine surgery at a single institution was completed. The VBQ score was calculated using the Ehresman et al.

METHOD

The C-VBQ scores, named according to placement of the region of interest within the cerebral spinal fluid, were calculated separately using the methods of Soliman et al. (C2-VBQ), Razzouk et al. (C5-VBQ), and Huang et al. (T1-VBQ). Linear regression models were utilized to evaluate correlations to the VBQ score.

RESULTS

A total of 105 patients were identified (mean age, 57.0 ± 11.9 years; women, 50.5%). Mean scores were C2-VBQ, 2.37 ± 0.55; C5-VBQ, 2.36 ± 0.61; and T1-VBQ, 2.64 ± 0.68. The C-VBQ scores for the C2 level were significantly higher than those for the C3-C6 levels (3.18 ± 0.96 vs. 2.63 ± 0.77, P < 0.001), whereas the C7 level was found to have significantly lower C-VBQ scores (2.42 ± 0.78 vs. 2.63 ± 0.77, P = 0.04). The C2-VBQ (r = 0.63) score had the strongest correlation to the VBQ score, compared to C5-VBQ (r = 0.41) and T1-VBQ (r = 0.43) (P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that the C2-VBQ had the strongest correlation to the lumbar VBQ score among all C-VBQ scores.

Upper instrumented vertebrae selection criteria for degenerative lumbar scoliosis based on the hounsfield unit asymmetry of the first coronal reverse vertebrae: an observational study

BACKGROUND

Selection of the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV) is crucial for surgical treatment of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS), given the relevance of UIV in postoperative proximal adjacent segment degeneration (pASD). Our previous research found that selection of UIV not lower than (≤) the first coronal reverse vertebra (FCRV), which marks the turning point of Hounsfield unit (HU) asymmetry, could significantly reduce pASD. However, the degree of HU asymmetry can vary among patients, suggesting a demand for more individualized UIV selection criteria, which we aimed to develop using quantitative HU measurement in the current study.

METHODS

We included 153 consecutive patients with DLS. Quantitative measurement of HU of both sides of the vertebrae of these patients was performed on three planes of CT reconstruction for average values and determination of FCRV. Pre- and postoperative X-ray plain films were examined for radiological measurements and determination of pASD. Further, 35 patients with lumbar disc herniation and without significant scoliosis were also included as the reference group, and their bilateral HU was measured.

RESULTS

In all 153 patients, those with UIV ≤ FCRV had a significantly lower rate of pASD (9.4% vs. 24.6%, P = 0.011). The difference between HU of the left and right sides of the FCRV (dF) could range from close to 0-59.4. The difference between HU of the left and right sides of the vertebrae in the reference group had an average value of 5.21. In 101 dF ≥ 5 DLS patients, those with UIV ≤ FCRV had a significantly lower rate of pASD (7.6% vs. 28.6%, P = 0.005), while this rate was insignificant in the other 52 dF < 5 patients (13.3% vs. 18.2%, P = 0.708). No other general, radiological, or operative parameter was found to have significant influence on the occurrence of pASD.

CONCLUSIONS

Selection of UIV ≤ FCRV can significantly reduce the risk of pASD for patients with DLS with dF ≥ 5. Trial Registration Not applicable, since this is an observational study.

Patterns of Misdiagnosis and Discordance in Detecting Osteoporosis: A Comparison of Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry and Lumbar Computed Tomography Hounsfield Units

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective chart review.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to identify the prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) by lumbar computed tomography (CT) Hounsfield units (HUs) in patients who have normal or osteopenic bone determined by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

OP is a critical issue in the postmenopausal and aging population. Bone mineral density assessment by DEXA has been described as insensitive for diagnosing OP in the lumbar spine. Improving the detection of OP can bring more patients to treatment and reduce the risks associated with low bone mineral density.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed all patients with DEXA scans and noncontrast CTs of the lumbar spine over a 15-year period. Patients were diagnosed as non-OP if they had a normal DEXA T -score (≥ -1) or osteopenic DEXA T -score (between -1.1 and -2.4). Patients in this cohort were considered osteoporotic by CT if L1-HU ≤110. Demographics and lumbar HUs were compared between these stratified groups.

RESULTS

A total of 74 patients were included for analysis. All patients were demographically, similar, and the average patient age was 70 years. The prevalence of OP determined by CT L1-HU ≤110 was 46% (normal DEXA: 9%, osteopenic DEXA: 63%). A significant number of males in our study were considered osteoporotic by L1-HU ≤110 (74%, P = 0.03). All individual axial and sagittal lumbar HU measurements including L1-L5 average lumbar HUs were statistically significant among non-OP and OP groups except for the lower lumbar levels ( P > 0.05 for L4 axial HUs, and L4-L5 sagittal HUs).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of OP in patients with normal or osteopenic T -scores is high. Among those with osteopenia by DEXA, more than 50% may lack appropriate medical treatment. The DEXA scan may be particularly insensitive to male bone quality making the CT HU the diagnostic method of choice for detecting OP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Decompression Alone in the Setting of Adult Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis and Stenosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.OBJECTIVESSurgical decompression alone for patients with neurogenic leg pain in the setting of degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) and stenosis is commonly performed, however, there is no summary of evidence for outcomes.

METHODS

A systematic search of English language medical literature databases was performed for studies describing outcomes of decompression alone in DLS, defined as Cobb angle >10˚, and 2-year minimum follow-up. Three outcomes were examined: 1) Cobb angle progression, 2) reoperation rate, and 3) ODI and overall satisfaction. Data were pooled and weighted averages were calculated to summarize available evidence.

RESULTS

Across 15 studies included in the final analysis, 586 patients were examined. Average preoperative and postoperative Cobb angles were 17.6˚ (Range: 12.7 - 25˚) and 18.0 (range 14.1 - 25˚), respectively. Average change in Cobb angle was an increase of 1.8˚. Overall rate of reoperation ranged from 3 to 33% with an average of 9.7%. Average ODI before surgery, after surgery, and change in scores were 56.4%, 27.2%, and an improvement of 29% respectively. Average from 8 studies that reported patient satisfaction was 71.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

Current literature on decompression alone in the setting of DLS is sparse and is not high quality, limited to patients with small magnitude of lumbar coronal Cobb angle, and heterogenous in the type of procedure performed. Based on available evidence, select patients with DLS who undergo decompression alone had minimal progression of Cobb angle, relatively low reoperation rate, and favorable patient-reported outcomes.

Reliability of end, stable, neutral, first coronal reverse vertebrae identification in degenerative lumbar scoliosis: Intra- and interobserver consistency analysis

Objective

To assess the intra- and interobserver reliability by observer training level used for selecting the end vertebra (EV), neutral vertebra (NV), stable vertebra (SV), and first coronal reverse vertebrae (FCRV) in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS) patients.

Methods

Fifty consecutive upright long-cassette radiographs and CT examination of operative cases of DLS were evaluated by three surgeons at various levels of training. For each iteration, the observers attempted to identify the UEV, NV and SV from x-ray, and FCRV from the CT examination. Intra- and interobserver reliability was assessed by means of Cohen's Kappa correlation coefficient, and raw percentages of agreement were recorded.

Results

Intraobserver reliability was excellent for determining FCRV (K _a = 0.761-0.837), fair to good for determining UEV (K _a = 0.530-0.636), fair to good for determining SV (K _a = 0.519-0.644), and fair to good for determining NV (K _a = 0.504-0.734), respectively. Additionally, we also noted a trend towards better intraobserver reliability with increasing levels of experience. Interobserver reliability was poor between observers beyond chance for UEV, NV, SV (K _a = 0.105-0.358), and good reliability for FCRV (K _a = 0.581-0.624). All three observers agreed on the same level of the FCRV in 24 patients of the time, which presented less Coronal imbalance type C compared to the other 26 patients.

Conclusion

Experience and training level of the observers are important factors affecting the accurate identification of these vertebrae in DLS, intraobserver reliability increases along with increasing levels of observer experience. FCRV is superior to UEV, NV, and SV in the accuracy of identification, Type C coronal malalignment could affect the accurate identification of FCRV.

Proximal Fusion Level Above First Coronal Reverse Vertebrae: An Essential Factor Decreasing the Risk of Adjacent Segment Degeneration in Degenerative Lumbar Scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiological analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To explore whether proximal fusion level above first coronal reverse vertebrae (FCRV) could decrease risk of adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) in degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DLS).

METHODS

One hundred and 16 DLS patients were divided into 2 groups according to occurrence of ASD: study group (ASD positive group) and control group (ASD negative group). FCRV was defined as the first vertebrae that presents opposite orientation of asymmetric Hounsfield unit (HU) ratio from the other vertebrae within major curve. Incidence of ASD was evaluated in subgroups according to location between FCRV and upper instrumented vertebrae (UIV).

RESULTS

The fusion level was shorter in study group than that in control group. There were 12 patients presented FCRV 2-level proximal than SV, 32 patients presented FCRV 1-level proximal than SV, 35 patients presented the same vertebra of FCRV with SV, 23 patients presented FCRV 1-level distal than SV, 14 patients presented FCRV 2-level distal than SV. When UIV located above FCRV, no patient presented ASD, while 15.4% patients presented ASD when UIV located on FCRV. In study group, proximal scoliosis progression was detected in 1 patient (3.9%) when UIV located on FCRV, and 17 patients (29.8%) when UIV located below FCRV.

CONCLUSIONS

Proximal fusion level above FCRV could decrease the risk of ASD in DLS, especially for the proximal scoliosis progression. FCRV represent the transitional point of the mechanical load on coronal plane, and may be within a more stable condition than stable vertebrae measured from radiographs.

Hounsfield unit for assessing asymmetrical loss of vertebral bone mineral density and its correlation with curve severity in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Background

Low bone mass concomitantly occurs in patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) and can persist until skeletal maturity. The purpose of this study was to assess the asymmetrical loss of vertebral bone mineral density (vBMD) and its correlation with curve severity in patients with AIS using Hounsfield unit (HU) values measured from computed tomography scans.

Methods

A total of 93 AIS patients were retrospectively recruited. The HU values of the vertebral body (VB-HU) and pedicle screw trajectory (PST-HU) were measured from four vertebrae above (Apex − 4) to four below (Apex + 4) the apical vertebra (Apex) of the major curve. The VB-HU and PST-HU at the upper end vertebra, Apex, and lower end vertebra within the concave and convex sides of the major and minor curves and stable vertebrae were obtained.

Results

A significant correlation was found between the Cobb angle and VB-HU at the periapical levels of the major curve. VB-HU and PST-HU at periapical levels were significantly greater within the concavity than the convexity of both major and minor curves. The asymmetric ratios of VB-HU and PST-HU were significantly correlated with the major curve Cobb angle, peaked at the apex, and gradually diminished from the apex to the end vertebrae. The asymmetrical loss of vBMD aggravated with the progression of curve severity, presenting as VB-HU, significantly decreased within the convexity and insignificantly decreased within the concavity of the major curve.

Conclusion

The asymmetrical loss of vBMD was associated with the progression of curve severity in AIS. For patients with severe AIS, the distraction of the pedicle screws at the concave side should be a priority in correcting the major curve, and supplemental anchors and larger-sized screws should be placed within the convex side around the apex of the major curve to reduce the risk of screw loosening after surgery.

Computed tomography-based paravertebral muscle density predicts subsequent vertebral fracture risks independently of bone mineral density in postmenopausal women following percutaneous vertebral augmentation

BACKGROUND

The risk of subsequent vertebral fractures (SVF) after the primary vertebral fracture cannot be explained by lower bone mineral density (BMD) alone. Computed tomography (CT) measurements of paravertebral muscle density (PMD) are recognized radiographic markers used to predict physical function, fragile fractures.

AIMS

This study aims to investigate the relationship between PMD and the risk of SVF in cohorts of postmenopausal women, and to determine if combining both PMD and BMD measures derived from CT can improve the accuracy of predicting SVF.

METHODS

This study enrolled 305 postmenopausal women between the ages of 50 and 88 for 3 years of follow-up studies. Trabecular attenuation (Hounsfield units, HU) was measured at L1 level and muscle attenuation of paravertebral muscle at L3 level on preoperative lumbar CT scans to determine the L1 BMD and L3 PMD. Kaplan-Meier analysis was applied to evaluate SVF-free survival. The hazard ratios (HRs) of PMD for SVF events were estimated with the Cox proportional hazards model. The predictive values of L1 BMD and L3 PMD for SVF were quantified using the Receiver-Operating Characteristic (ROC) curve.

RESULT

During the 3 years of follow-up studies, 88 patients (28.9%) suffered an SVF. ROC curve analysis demonstrated that an L3 PMD threshold of 32 HU had a sensitivity of 89.8% and a specificity of 62% for the prediction of SVF. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that L3 PMD ≤ 32 HU was significantly associated with lower SVF-free survival (p < 0.001; log-rank test). After adjusting for age, BMI, diabetes, postoperative osteoporosis treatment, handgrip strength, L1 BMD, multivariate analyses also indicated a persistent modest effect of L3 PMD on SVF-free survival. The area under the ROC curve of L3 PMD and L1 BMD, combined to predict the risk of SVF, was 0.790, which was significantly higher than the value for L1 BMD alone (0.735). L3 PMD and L1 BMD significantly improved the accuracy of SVF risk prediction compared with L1 BMD alone, which was confirmed by reclassification improvement measures. The inclusion of handgrip strength and postoperative osteoporosis treatment in the model further improved SVF prediction accuracy, and PMD remained significant in the model.

CONCLUSION

Decreased L3 PMD is an independent risk predictor of SVF. Combined CT-based L1 BMD and L3 PMD can significantly improve the accuracy of predicting the risk of SVF in postmenopausal women who have suffered prior osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Reliability of Hounsfield Unit for Assessing Asymmetrical Vertebral Bone Mass in Adult Degenerative Scoliosis

Objective

Hounsfield Unit (HU) has been used to investigate the asymmetrical vertebral bone mass in patients associated with adult degenerative scoliosis (ADS). Therefore, there is an inevitable need to evaluate the performance of HU values in ADS subjects.

Methods

A total of 162 patients (81 ADS patients and 81 non-ADS patients) aged ≥50 years undergoing the CT examination were reviewed. The HU values of the lumbar vertebral body (including total, convex side, and concave side) at bilateral pedicle plane were obtained and compared. The paired t-test, chi-squared test, independent samples t-test, and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were used for statistical analyses.

Results

The HU values were significantly different between the convex and concave sides of the lumbar vertebral body (P < 0.01). The total prevalence of osteoporosis (OP) in ADS patients was higher than that of non-ADS patients. The prevalence of OP in female or male of ADS patients was higher than that of non-ADS patients, respectively. Intra- and inter-rater reliability were very strong (both >0.8) for measuring asymmetrical vertebral bone mass in ADS patients.

Conclusion

HU value was a high reproducibility method for evaluating the vertebral bone mass in ADS patients. The HU values at the concave sides were significantly higher than that of convex sides at the lumbar vertebral body on the pedicle plane. The prevalence of OP in ADS patients was higher than that of non-ADS patients, especially for females associated with ADS. Moreover, the static asymmetric load did not enhance the bone mass at the concave side compared with the left/right side of non-ADS patients.

Hounsfield Unit for Assessing Bone Mineral Density Distribution Within Cervical Vertebrae and Its Correlation With the Intervertebral Disc Degeneration

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective radiological analysis.

OBJECTIVE

To assess bone mineral mass distribution within cervical vertebrae based on Hounsfield unit (HU) measurement, and explore its correlation with intervertebral disc degeneration.

METHOD

Three hundred and twenty-four patients with degenerative cervical spine disease were retrospectively reviewed and divided into six groups according to age. HU measurement of the whole vertebrae from C3 through C7 was obtained, then HU measurement within upper and lower part of the vertebrae on sagittal plane were obtained from C3 through C7. Disc degeneration on MRI was graded from I to V using the Pfirrmann classification.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference in the HU value from C3 to C7 among Group II to Group VI, the HU value presented consistently decreasing trend from young patients to old patients. In C6 and C7 vertebrae, there were significant differences in HU values between upper and lower parts of the vertebrae. More importantly. In all groups, HU values were highest in the upper part of the C4 vertebrae and then gradually decreased towards C3 and C7. HU value of both upper and lower vertebrae presented decreasing trend along with the aggravation of the disc degeneration.

CONCLUSION

HU values are not typically consistent throughout all levels of the cervical spine and the distribution within the vertebrae is not homogeneous. Decreased vertebral BMD and vertebral osteoporosis may trigger or exacerbate the adjacent intervertebral disc degeneration.