Use of carboxymethylcellulose/polyethylene oxide gel in microdiscectomy with interlaminectomy: a case series comparison with long-term follow-up

Effects of adhesion barrier gel on functional outcomes of patients with lumbar disc herniation surgery; A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials

Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) is persistent pain and disability following lumbar laminectomy which is associated with decreased quality of life and disability and has been reported in up to 40% of the patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy. Several approaches have been introduced to reduce the rate of the FBSS. Among these, applying anti-adhesive barrier gels have been studied with interest with controversial results. The aim of the current study was to determine the effects of anti-adhesive barrier gels on functional outcome and recurrence of patients undergoing lumbar disc surgery. We searched databases including EMBASE, PUBMED, Web of Science, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and scholar databases until November 2019. To assess the heterogeneity across included studies was used Cochran's Q and I-square (I²) statistics. Standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI between were used to estimate pooled effect sizes. Out of 4507, 10 clinical trials found to be appropriate for current meta-analysis. The pooled results of included clinical trials indicated that adhesion barrier gel significantly decreased leg pain (LP) (SMD = −0.31; 95% CI, −0.60, −0.03; P = 0.032; I²: 59.2%) among patients with lumbar disc herniation surgery. Back pain (BP) (SMD = −0.03; 95% CI, −0.23, 0.16; P = 0.734; I²: 40.2%), and Oswestry disability index (ODI) (SMD = −0.11; 95% CI, −0.27, 0.05; P = 0.178; I²: 0.0%), were not significantly affected following adhesion barrier gel application. Application of adhesion barrier gel in single level lumbar disc surgery is associated with deceased leg pain. However, its application does not affect the low back pain, disability and gate. Further, larger randomized clinical trials are required.

Polymer materials for prevention of postoperative adhesion

Postoperative adhesion (POA) is a common complication that often occurs after a variety of surgeries, such as plastic surgery, repair operations of abdominal, pelvic, and tendon, and so forth. Moreover, POA leads to chronic abdominal pain, secondary infertility in women, intestinal obstruction, and other severe complications, which significantly reduce the life quality of patients. In order to prevent the formation of POA, a number of strategies have been developed, among which an emerging method is physical barriers consisting of polymer materials. This review highlights the most commonly used natural and synthetic polymer materials in anti-adhesion physical barriers. The specific features of polymer materials are analyzed and compared, and the possible prospect is also predicted.

STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE

Postoperative adhesion (POA) is a serious complication accompanied with various surgeries. Polymer material-based physical barriers have attracted a large amount of attention in POA prevention. The polymer barriers can effectively avoid the formation of fibrous tissues among normal organs by reducing the interconnection of injured tissues. In this review, specific features of the natural and synthetic polymer materials for application in POA prevention were presented, and the possible prospects were predicted. All in all, our work can provide inspiration for researchers to choose proper polymer materials for preclinical and even clinical anti-adhesion studies.

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Signal Characteristics of Medishield: Early Postoperative Profile in a Rabbit Interlaminotomy Model

OBJECTIVE

Application of Medishield to the nerve root is common during spinal surgery to create a mechanical barrier from pain mediators and reduce scar formation. However, Medishield's signal characteristics on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have not yet been examined.

METHODS

Microsurgical interlaminotomy was performed on 2 lower lumbar segments in 17 adult New Zealand white rabbits. After dural exposure, applications of 1 mL (autologous blood clot or Medishield) were randomized for each level. On postoperative days 1 through 3, various MRI sequences in 1.5T were performed including T1-weighted, T2-w, T1-gadolinium-weighted, susceptibility-weighted and turbo inversion recovery magnitude (TIRM) sequence. Signaling characteristics were analyzed by 3 blinded observers. Inter-rater agreement was calculated using Fleiss's kappa coefficient (κ). Positive and negative likelihood ratios in detecting Medishield by MRI were determined.

RESULTS

Of 24 MRIs performed, TIRM sequence identified Medishield with the highest likelihood ratio. Medishield's positive likelihood ratio was highest (5.8) on postoperative day 1 with interobserver agreement of 93% (κ = 0.75); these rates declined to 2.5 and 1.4 on postoperative days 2 and 3 with interobserver agreements of 71% (κ = 0.43) and 83% (κ = 0.67), respectively. Medishield adherence was confirmed in each rabbit by histologic examinations.

CONCLUSION

Understanding that radiologic detection of Medishield diminished over time as its signal characteristics became less distinguishable from a blood clot is essential in clinical practice. Medishield was detected on postoperative day 1 but not 2 days later after hemodynamic changes had occurred. These results may provide a guide for postoperative findings, such as differential diagnosis of hematoma.

Reduction of Leg Pain by Oxiplex Gel After Lumbar Discectomy in Patients With Predominant Leg Pain and Elevated Levels of Lower Back Pain: A Prospective, Randomized, Blinded, Multicenter Clinical Study

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, blinded, multicenter clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate carboxymethylcellulose/polyethylene oxide gel (Oxiplex) in improving clinical outcomes in subjects having predominant leg pain and elevated low back pain undergoing first-time lumbar discectomy for disk herniation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Clinical studies in the United States and Italy found that Oxiplex reduced leg pain after decompression surgery.

METHODS

A total of 68 subjects with herniated lumbar disk were enrolled and randomized into treatment (surgery plus gel) or surgery-only control groups. A prospective statistical analysis assessed the effect of gel in the severe back pain subgroup (prespecified as greater than or equal to median baseline back pain of the population studied). All subjects except 2 controls lost to follow-up completed the study. Preoperative and postoperative visual analogue scale leg pain scores were analyzed and compared between groups at 60 days after surgery.

RESULTS

There were no serious adverse events or neurological safety concerns reported in any patients. Gel-treated patients had statistically significantly lower visual analogue scale leg pain scores at study end compared with controls (P=0.0240), representing a 21% additional reduction in leg pain compared with surgery alone in the severe baseline back pain subgroup (P=0.0240). The proportion of subgroup patients experiencing zero leg pain at study end was significantly higher in the gel treatment group (60%) than in the control group (23%) (P=0.0411).

CONCLUSIONS

The data from this study confirm and extend results of 2 previous studies in Italy and the United States that reported statistically significantly greater reductions in leg pain in gel-treated patients with severe preoperative low back pain compared with patients who only underwent decompression surgery.

Case series and descriptive cohort studies in neurosurgery: the confusion and solution

BACKGROUND

Case series (CS) are well-known designs in contemporary use in neurosurgery but are sometimes used in contexts that are incompatible with their true meaning as defined by epidemiologists. This inconsistent, inappropriate and incorrect use, and mislabeling impairs the appropriate indexing and sorting of evidence.

METHOD

Using PubMed, we systematically identified published articles that had "case series" in the "title" in 15 top-ranked neurosurgical journals from January 2008 to December 2012. The abstracts and/or full articles were scanned to identify those with descriptions of the principal method as being "case series" and then classified as "true case series" or "non-case series" by two independent investigators with 100 % inter-rater agreement.

RESULTS

Sixty-four articles had the label "case series" in their "titles." Based on the definition of "case series" and our appraisal of the articles using Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines, 18 articles (28.13 %) were true case series, while 46 (71.87 %) were mislabeled. Thirty-five articles (54.69 %) mistook retrospective (descriptive) cohorts for CS. CS are descriptive with an outcome-based sampling, while "descriptive cohorts" have an exposure-based sampling of patients, followed over time to assess outcome(s). A comparison group is not a defining feature of a cohort study and distinguishes descriptive from analytic cohorts.

CONCLUSION

A distinction between a case report, case series, and descriptive cohorts is absolutely necessary to enable the appropriate indexing, sorting, and application of evidence. Researchers need better training in methods and terminology, and editors and reviewers should scrutinize more carefully manuscripts claiming to be "case series" studies.

Use of Temporary Implantable Biomaterials to Reduce Leg Pain and Back Pain in Patients with Sciatica and Lumbar Disc Herniation

The principle etiology of leg pain (sciatica) from lumbar disc herniation is mechanical compression of the nerve root. Sciatica is reduced by decompression of the herniated disc, i.e., removing mechanical compression of the nerve root. Decompression surgery typically reduces sciatica more than lumbar back pain (LBP). Decompression surgery reduces mechanical compression of the nerve root. However, decompression surgery does not directly reduce sensitization of the sensory nerves in the epidural space and disc. In addition, sensory nerves in the annulus fibrosus and epidural space are not protected from topical interaction with pain mediators induced by decompression surgery. The secondary etiology of sciatica from lumbar disc herniation is sensitization of the nerve root. Sensitization of the nerve root results from a) mechanical compression, b) exposure to cellular pain mediators, and/or c) exposure to biochemical pain mediators. Although decompression surgery reduces nerve root compression, sensory nerve sensitization often persists. These observations are consistent with continued exposure of tissue in the epidural space, including the nerve root, to increased cellular and biochemical pain mediators following surgery. A potential contributor to lumbar back pain (LBP) is stimulation of sensory nerves in the annulus fibrosus by a) cellular pain mediators and/or b) biochemical pain mediators that accompany annular tears or disruption. Sensory fibers located in the outer one-third of the annulus fibrosus increase in number and depth as a result of disc herniation. The nucleus pulposus is comprised of material that can produce an autoimmune stimulation of the sensory nerves located in the annulus and epidural space leading to LBP. The sensory nerves of the annulus fibrosus and epidural space may be sensitized by topical exposure to cellular and biochemical pain mediators induced by lumbar surgery. Annulotomy or annular rupture allows the nucleus pulposus topical access to sensory nerve fibers, thereby leading to LBP. Coverage of the annulus and adjacent structures in the epidural space by absorbable viscoelastic gels appears to reduce LBP following surgery by protecting sensory fibers from cellular and biochemical pain mediators.

Application of a new hydrogel dural sealant that reduces epidural adhesion formation: evaluation in a large animal laminectomy model

OBJECT

The aim of this study was to evaluate the application and effects of a novel, nonswelling, polyethylene glycol-based hydrogel adhesion barrier and sealant in a canine laminectomy model of CSF leakage and adhesion formation.

METHODS

After full-width L-2 and L-5 laminectomies, 1-cm midline durotomies were created and sutured closed, except for the last 1-2 mm on the cranial end to create spontaneous CSF leakage. All 5 control animals received no further treatment. Experimental animals received hydrogel at both durotomy sites via either the Dual Liquid applicator (5 animals) or MicroMyst gas-assisted sprayer (5 animals). Sealing of the CSF leak was confirmed by Valsalva maneuver. At 2 months, 2 animals from each group were killed to evaluate dural healing and epidural adhesion formation. The remaining animals were similarly evaluated 4 months after surgery. One animal died at 66 days due to a cause unrelated to hydrogel treatment.

RESULTS

In hydrogel-treated animals, all leaking durotomies were sealed intraoperatively. All animals recovered uneventfully. There were no treatment-related health effects. MicroMyst hydrogel application was more controlled, slower, and significantly less thick (p = 0.0094) than Dual Liquid application. All 5 control animals developed subcutaneous CSF accumulations under the incision within days of surgery, compared with only 1 of 10 hydrogel-treated animals (p = 0.002). At 2 and 4 months, control laminectomy sites showed extensive, dense epidural adhesions blending with neodura, compared with hydrogel-treated sites (p < 0.0001 and p = 0.0234, respectively). At 2 months in hydrogel-treated animals, gel filled the epidural space and no epidural adhesions were noted (p < 0.0001 relative to controls). At 4 months, the hydrogel was absorbed. The hydrogel space was filled with scant, loosely organized connective tissue.

CONCLUSIONS

Hydrogel prevented CSF leakage and mitigated epidural scarring without affecting healing of the dura or laminectomy site. The safety profile of the hydrogel appears favorable due to its synthetic composition, polyethylene glycol chemistry, minimal local tissue response, and lack of neurological deficits. Controlled application of such hydrogel materials may reduce the incidence of postoperative leaks, prevent adhesion formation and thus improve recovery from spinal surgery, and improve identification of tissue planes for reoperations.

Evaluation of Perivascular Adhesion Formation in New Zealand White Rabbits Using Oxiplex and DuraSeal Xact Adhesion Barrier System

Background

Adhesion formation after spine surgery is a result of normal wound healing that may place patients at increased risk for complications during revision surgery. Preventing adhesions could reduce the risk of complications during revision surgery, and possibly reduce the need for revision procedures. This study evaluates the ability of DuraSeal Xact Adhesion Barrier System (DSX) (Covidien, Mansfield, Massachusetts) and Oxiplex/SP gel (OX) (FzioMed, San Luis Obispo, California) to affect the extent and severity of postoperative perivascular adhesion development in an anterior spinal surgical rabbit model.

Methods

We determined the extent and severity of postoperative adhesion development 34 days after surgery in 12 male New Zealand White rabbits randomly assigned to intraoperative treatment with either DSX or OX, or to an untreated control group. Adhesion severity and extent were scored on scale from 0 (none) to 3 (severe).

Results

The extent and severity of adhesions in the DSX group were significantly less than in the untreated control group. The DSX group mean extent score was 1.3 ± 0.5 (vs 2.5, P = .01) and the mean severity score was 1.25 ± 0.5 (vs 2.8, P = .005). The extent and severity of adhesions in the OX group were not significantly different from the control group.

Conclusion

In this study, we found DSX to be the most effective compound in preventing adhesion formation after anterior spine surgery.

Clinical Relevance

Extrapolating these results in rabbits to humans, less scarring between the major blood vessels could decrease the rate of complications in revision spine procedures.