Combined anterior C2-C3 fusion and C2 pedicle screw fixation for the treatment of unstable hangman's fracture: a contrast to anterior approach only

Anterior atlantoaxial motion preservation fixation technique for axis complex fractures (odontoid process with Hangman's fractures) and technique notes

This study aims to investigate the feasibility and efficacy of anterior atlantoaxial motion preservation fixation (AMPF) in treating axis complex fractures involving the odontoid process fracture and Hangman's fractures with C2/3 instability. A retrospective study was conducted on eight patients who underwent AMPF for axis complex fractures at the General Hospital of Central Theater Command from February 2004 to October 2021. The types of axis injuries, reasons for injuries, surgery time, intraoperative blood loss, spinal cord injury classification (American Spinal Injury Association, ASIA), as well as complications and technical notes, were documented. This study included eight cases of type II Hangman's fracture, five cases of type II and three cases of type III odontoid process fracture. Five patients experienced traffic accidents, while three patients experienced falling injuries. All patients underwent AMPF surgery with an average intraoperative blood loss of 288.75 mL and a duration of 174.5 min. Two patients experienced dysphagia 1 month after surgery. The patients were followed up for an average of 15.63 months. One case improved from C to E in terms of neurological condition, three cases improved from D to E, and four cases remained at E. Bony fusion and Atlantoaxial Motion Preservation were successfully achieved for all eight patients. AMPF is a feasible and effective way for simultaneous odontoid process fracture and Hangman's fractures with C2/3 instability, while preserving atlantoaxial movement.

Hangman's Fracture in Geriatric Population: A Nationwide Multicenter Study in Japan

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective multicenter study.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the treatments of the geriatric population with hangman's fractures using a multicenter database under the Japan Association of Spine Surgeons with Ambition (JASA).

METHODS

The multicenter database included data from 1512 patients. We employed the Levine and Edwards classification for categorizing hangman's fractures. The study incorporated epidemiological data, including the prevalence of hangman's fractures, patient age, and follow-up duration. Bony fusion rates and length of hospitalization were recorded for Type I and Type II fractures, and the degree of neurological impairment was assessed.

RESULTS

Hangman's fractures represented 62 cases, accounting for 7.4% of all cervical spine injuries. The patients had an average age of 76.6 ± 6.5 years, and the mean duration of follow-up was 21.5 ± 23.6 months. The study found that the bony fusion rate for hangman's fractures in the geriatric population was 88.9%. Surgical treatment was associated with a shorter hospitalization period for Type II fractures compared to conservative treatment. Thirteen cases of hangman's fractures in the geriatric population, accounting for 21%, were complicated by spinal cord injury.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest study to date on hangman's fractures in geriatric population ≥65 years. Type I and Type II fractures, according to the Levine and Edwards classification, had a bony fusion rate of up to 90%. In patients with Type II fractures, surgical treatment led to a shorter initial hospital stay. Geriatric patients are at risk of spinal cord injury due to hangman's fractures.

Analysis of the clinical characteristics of adult patients with hangman's fractures: A retrospective study based on multicenter clinical data

Background

There are few reports on the clinical characteristics of adult patients with hangman's fractures.

Methods

The clinical data of adult patients were collected from the hangman's fracture database of 7 medical centers. Data on patients who met the inclusion and exclusion criteria were retrospectively analyzed. Data, including gender, age, mechanism of injury, fracture classification, and treatment, were statistically analyzed.

Results

A total of 216 eligible patients (160 males and 56 females, with a mean age of 49.7 years) were selected. There was no statistically significant difference in gender distribution of different age groups. The male-to-female ratio was similar in the young group (18–44 years) and the middle-aged group (45–64 years) (both about 3:1) but decreased in the elderly group (65 years and above) (about 2:1). Overall, high-energy injury was the main mechanism of injury. There was a statistically significant difference in the percentage of patients with high-energy injury in various age groups (the highest in the young group, and the lowest in the elderly group). Overall, unstable fracture was the main fracture type, with a higher proportion in the young and elderly groups than that in the middle-aged group, but there was no statistically significant difference. From the perspective of treatment options, the percentage of patients receiving surgery was higher in the young and elderly groups than that in the middle-aged group.

Conclusion

Hangman's fracture is predominant in males of all age groups, with high-energy injury as the main mechanism of injury. Unstable fracture is common fracture type. The percentage of patients receiving surgery in the young and elderly groups is higher than that in the middle-aged group, which may be correlated with the high incidence of unstable fracture and the life characteristics of the patients in the young and elderly age groups.

New Trend in Craniovertebral Junction Surgical Strategy: Technical Note for the Treatment of Hangman's Fractures Through a Minimally Invasive Approach

INTRODUCTION

The reduction, stabilization, and maintenance of alignment are the main goals in the surgical treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. The choice of the surgical strategy remains poorly standardized; anterior and/or posterior fusion could be performed; and none of the available clinical studies in the literature have shown significant differences in outcomes or complication rates. Vertebral anatomy, age, comorbidities, patient factors, and surgical experience may guide the treatment choice.

METHODS

We present a case of a polytraumatized young woman with an unstable hangman's fracture type II, according to Levine-Edwards classification. We treated the fracture by using a plate with four holes to fix C2-C3 without discectomy and body fusion.

RESULTS

We performed a small incision, such as those used for the fixation of odontoid screws, where the working angle allowed us to easily and quickly position the plate by using a minimally invasive approach.

CONCLUSION

The stabilization alone, without discectomy and body fusion with the cage, in the same way favored the natural healing of the bone fracture. In our opinion, in some select cases, fixation of C2-C3 alone through a minimally invasive approach allows for bone healing with fewer risks and an easier surgery.

Posterior fixation for paediatric and adolescent unstable hangman's fracture: evolution to C1 sparing techniques

PURPOSE

The aim was to study surgical outcomes in hangman's fractures in paediatric and adolescent patients and to demonstrate evolution in posterior surgery from C1-C2-C3 fusion to C1 sparing techniques.

METHODS

Patients (aged ≤ 18 years) operated at a tertiary level centre between September 2011 to February 2018 with more than 1 year of follow-up were included. Neurological status, type of fracture, operating time, blood loss, follow-up, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

Nine patients were included, with mean age mean of 16.45 years, with a mean follow-up of 42.78 months. Six patients having neurological deficit showed improvement. Two patients, one having undergone C1-C3 lateral mass screw rod fixation (LMSF) and other had C2 pedicle screw with C3 LMSF, developed kyphosis for which fixation was further extended caudally. One patient with an old hangman's fracture with reabsorbed axis pedicle underwent C2 body screw along with C3-C4 pedicle screw rod fixation and C2 pedicle reconstruction. All patients showed evidence of postoperative fusion.

CONCLUSION

Hangman's fractures in young patients can be successfully managed via posterior fixation. In our centre, we have evolved in the direction of motion preservation at C1 C2 joint, along with 3 column stable fixation of the C2 pedicle. C2 pedicle reformation has allowed motion preserving surgery in complex fracture types. Extension of construct till C4 in selected cases is important to prevent postoperative kyphosis.

Anterior C2-3 fusion surgery alone for highly displaced Hangman's fracture with severe angulation of C2-3 of more than 30°

BACKGROUND

Highly displaced Hangman's fracture is a very rare and extremely unstable fracture of the C2 axis. Combined anteroposterior or posterior long-segment fusion surgery is typically performed for the treatment of highly displaced Hangman's fracture. However, these kinds of surgeries increase the risk of complications, loss of motion, and hospital costs.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to investigate the surgical outcomes of anterior C2-3 fusion surgery alone for highly displaced Hangman's fractures with severe angulation of C2-3 by more than 30° and discoligamentous injury.

METHODS

A total of five patients (four men and one woman) were included in this study with a mean age of 40.4 years (range, 26-70 years). The mean follow-up period after surgery was 37.2 months (range, 12-96 months). The fracture characteristics, treatment methods, and outcomes were retrospectively analyzed.

RESULTS

All five patients had type II Hangman's fractures (according to the Levine and Edwards classification scheme). None of the included patients had neurologic deficit or other spine injury but all patients had complete C2-3 discoligamentous injury. Before surgery, all patients successfully achieved closed reduction by skull traction, followed by C2-3 anterior decompression and fusion (ACDF) with plating. For interbody grafting, three patients received a polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cage filled with an autogenous cancellous iliac bone graft and two received autogenous tricortical iliac bone grafts. Severe angulation (39.2° vs. 3.0°, P < 0.001) and severe displacement (76.1% vs. 4.0%, P < 0.001) of C2-3 were both significantly corrected after surgery. All patients had achieved solid fusion at last follow-up. In terms of clinical outcomes, the mean neck pain visual analog scale score was significantly improved (8.6 points vs. 1.8 points, P < 0.001). The mean neck disability index value was also significantly improved (45.4 points vs. 13.0 points, P < 0.01). According to Odom's criteria, all patients achieved satisfactory outcomes. No major complications occurred. One patient complained of dysphagia, but recovered after three months with conservative treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative closed reduction and anterior C2-3 fusion surgery alone should be considered as a less-invasive and useful surgical option for highly displaced Hangman's fracture with severe angulation of C2-3, which is an extremely unstable fracture of the C2 axis.

Evolution to Pedicle Reformation Technique in Surgical Management of Hangman's Fracture

BACKGROUND

Opinions vary regarding optimal treatment of unstable hangman's fractures. Recent technological advances have allowed short segment, motion preserving fixation, even in complex cases. The aim of the study was to demonstrate C1-C2 motion-preserving short-segment fusion in hangman's fracture and the evolution of technique from pedicle realignment to pedicle reformation in complex fractures with resorbed/destroyed C2 pedicles.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. Patients operated by a single surgeon at a tertiary level center from 2012 to 2018 were included. The type of fracture, operating time, and blood loss was recorded. Neurologic deficits were recorded using the American Spinal Injury Association scale with regular clinicoradiologic follow-up.

RESULTS

Nine patients (8 male), with a mean age of 36 ± 16.9 years were included. In the initial 7 patients, C2 pedicle screw, C3-C4 lateral mass screw, and rod fixation was done. The last 2 patients were complex neglected injuries, with 1 having severe angulation and displacement and the other having spondyloptosis with C2 body placed anterior to C4 body. In both these patients, direct C2 body screw were placed and pedicle reconstruction was done. Mean follow up was 41.4 ± 29.8 months. All 5 patients with preoperative neurologic deficits had improvement in power. C1-C2 joint motion was preserved in all. All patients had bony fusion.

CONCLUSIONS

Preservation of motion at the C1-C2 joint should be the goal in all surgically managed hangman's fracture patients. The technique of C2 pedicle reconstruction can be utilized for the same in old neglected hangman's fractures.

Experience of Using Transpedicular Osteosynthesis in Traumatic Spondylolisthesis of the Axis

The aim of the study was to assess the efficacy and safety of direct posterior transpedicular osteosynthesis in traumatic spondylolisthesis of C₂ vertebra.

Materials and Methods

The present study is an observational retrospective analysis of the results of surgical treatment of 19 patients operated on in 2014-2020 using the posterior transpedicular osteosynthesis technique with Herbert's compression screws for a Hangman's fracture type II according to Levine-Edwards classification. After the operation, the follow-up period lasted for 22 [10; 36] months.

Results

The study group of patients (n=19) made 2.48% of all patients operated on for traumatic injury of the cervical spine (n=766) in the period from 2014 to 2020. In all cases, the surgical treatment was successful; there were no intraoperative complications in the form of damage to the vascular and nerve structures. The average duration of surgery was 70.8±24.5 min, and intraoperative blood loss was 92.9±41.8 ml. The length of hospitalization stay was 7 [5; 17] days. On the postoperative CT scans, no significant screw malposition (>2 mm) was found.

Conclusion

Transpedicular osteosynthesis with compression screws in C₂ traumatic spondylolisthesis is a safe and sparing operation with a short duration and insignificant blood loss. Thorough preoperative planning and knowledge of the anatomic landmarks make it possible to perform this operation effectively under the C-arm X-ray system control without any navigation system.

A new transpedicular lag screw fixation for treatment of unstable Hangman's fracture: a minimum 2-year follow-up study

BACKGROUND

A new C2 transpedicular lag screw designed by our team has been used in human cadaver spines for biomechanical testing, and the results showed that the biomechanical properties of the new C2 transpedicular lag screw were better than ordinary screws. The objective of this study is to analyze the clinical efficacy and safety of the new C2 transpedicular lag screw fixation for the treatment of unstable Hangman's fracture.

METHODS

From March 2013 to June 2017, 25 patients who had unstable Hangman's fractures were operated on with a new C2 transpedicular lag screw fixation. The patients included 18 males and 7 females whose ages ranged from 31 to 62 years (average 45.4 ± 9.3 years). The cause of the injury was a traffic accident in 17 patients and a fall from height in 8 patients. Other associated lesions included rupture of the spleen (1 patient) and rib fractures (2 patients). According to the Levine-Edwards classification, 17 patients were type II and 8 patients were type IIA, and according to the Frankel Neurological Performance scale, 8 cases and 17 cases were graded as spinal cord injury D and E, respectively. Twenty-three cases received bilateral screw fixation, and 2 cases had unilateral screw fixation because another pedicle was chipped. The whole procedure was accomplished with monitoring by "C"-arm fluoroscopy.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 36 ± 12 months and ranged from 24 to 60 months. No obvious symptomatic or radiologic postoperative complications were found during the follow-up period. Six cases were restored from D to E while 2 cases remained D according to the American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grade. Pre- and postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) and Neck Disability Index (NDI) were statistically different (P < 0.001). Osseous union was achieved in all cases, and the range of cervical motion recovered to the normal level up to the last follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

The primary clinical and radiographic efficacies of a new C2 transpedicular lag screw fixation for the treatment of unstable Hangman's fracture were satisfactory. This approach could be considered a simple, effective, reliable, and economic surgical method for managing unstable Hangman's fractures.

A novel technique using a pedicle screw and bucking bar for the treatment of hangman's fracture

The treatment of hangman's fracture is controversial. If treated with a traditional surgical procedure, there will likely be many complications, such as kyphosis, pseudarthrosis and nonunion. Our present study aims to describe a bucking bar method with pedicle screw fixation to treat hangman's fracture. Thirty-two patients with an unstable hangman's fracture who underwent posterior C2-3 pedicle lag screw fixation surgery assisted by a bucking bar between May 2004 and Jan 2017 were evaluated. All the participating patients were successfully treated using this novel technique, and follow-up revealed anatomical fusion in 27 patients, incomplete fusion in 4 patients, and C2-3 angular deformity healing in 1 patient. No patient developed throat wall edema or pseudomembrane formation. Satisfactory reduction, fixation and fusion of C2 pedicle fractures can be achieved using a pedicle screw assisted with the transoral bucking bar technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, retrospective case-series study.

Treatment of Axis Ring Fractures: Recommendations of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma (DGOU)

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative literature review and expert recommendation.

OBJECTIVE

To establish treatment recommendations for axis ring fractures based on the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma.

METHODS

This recommendation summarizes the knowledge of the experts of the Spine Section of the German Society for Orthopaedics and Trauma with regard to the treatment of axis ring fractures based on a narrative literature review.

RESULTS

Typical "hangman's fractures" with bilateral separation of the neural arch from C2 and atypical "hangman's fractures" with irregular fracture morphology are described. Computed tomography is the "gold" standard used to detect and analyse these fractures adequately. Furthermore, the detection of vertebral artery integrity is necessary. To classify axis ring fractures, the Levine-Edwards or Josten classification is recommended. In particular, the integrity of the C2/3 disc and the integrity of the anterior longitudinal ligament are used to determine the treatment strategy. While Levine-Edwards type I and type IIA (Josten type 1 and 2) fractures should be treated conservatively, Levine type II and type III (Josten type 3 and 4) fractures should be treated operatively. Levine-Edwards type II fractures will be predominately treated by anterior C2/3 fusion. Levine-Edwards type III fractures have to be primary reduced, if an anterior fusion is planned (anterior cervical discectomy and fusion [ACDF] C2/3). If a closed reduction of a type III fracture is impossible, an open reduction and posterior fixation/fusion is the treatment of choice.

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment is predominantly reserved for Levine-Edwards I and IIA fractures. Operative treatment should be performed in case of Levine-Edwards II and III fractures.

Individual Surgical Strategy Using Posterior Lag Screw-Rod Technique for Unstable Atypical Hangman's Fracture Based on Different Fracture Patterns

OBJECTIVE

The literature on surgical management of atypical hangman's fracture (AHF) is sparse. The aim of this study was to describe an individual surgical strategy using a lag screw-rod technique for treatment of unstable AHF based on different fracture patterns.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of 23 patients with unstable AHF was performed. Fractures were classified into 3 patterns: A, 1 fracture line through 1 side of C2 body obliquely and another through pars interarticularis on the other side; B, 1 fracture line through 1 side of C2 body obliquely and another through contralateral lamina; C, bilateral oblique fracture lines through posterior cortex of C2 on different sides. Posterior C2-C3 pedicle screw fixation and fusion using a lag screw-rod technique with different surgical strategies for each fracture pattern was used for all patients. Complications, neck pain, neurologic status, reduction of anterior translation and angulation between C2 and C3, and fusion rate were evaluated.

RESULTS

No technique-related complications (e.g., spinal cord or nerve injury caused by malposition of screws) occurred. Mean follow-up time was 37 months. Satisfactory reduction and bony union were demonstrated on postoperative radiographs. Neck pain and neurologic deficits caused by C2 injury improved significantly in all patients after operation. No graft or implant-related complications were observed in patients during the entire follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Using individual surgical strategies based on different fracture patterns, the posterior C2-C3 lag screw-rod technique may be an effective and reliable option for unstable AHF.

Management challenges of traumatic spondylolisthesis of the Axis with an unusual C2-C3 posterior subluxation in a paediatric patient: case report and literature review

Introduction

Paediatric cervical spine injuries are uncommon. Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis (TSA) is commonly encountered in the trauma setting. The management of TSA may be surgical or non-surgical. Decision making is quite challenging depending on patient presentation and nature of injury, and even more so in the paediatric age group.

Objectives

To present a case report highlighting the challenges in the management of TSA.

Methods

We present an 8 year old male, who sustained a bilateral C2 pars fracture with associated unusual C2-C3 posterior subluxation.

Results

Neuroradiological studies identified the fracture/subluxation of C2-C3 and revealed an intact but posteriorly displaced C2-C3 disc causing cord compression. An Extension Halter traction was initially commenced. This seemed to have worsened the patient's neck pains, and caused motor weakness and autonomic dysfunction. An anterior cervical discectomy and fusion was finally decided on and performed after evaluation and brainstorming by our spinal Unit. Intra-operative findings revealed separation of the C2-C3 disc from the C3 superior end plate which probably explains the unusual nature of the subluxation.

Conclusion

The case shows that surgical intervention as a primary management for TSA even in the paediatric age group is safe and also avoids risks inherent in conservative management.

Combined Anterior-Posterior Fixation and Fusion for Completely Dislocated Hangman's Fracture: A Retrospective Analysis of 11 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effectiveness and feasibility of combined anterior-posterior fixation and fusion for the treatment of completely dislocated hangman's fracture.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A completely dislocated hangman's fracture describes the complete anterior displacement of the C2 vertebral body onto the C3 body. This type of fracture is exceptionally unstable, and for which the management is challenging. Specific treatment strategies need to be further clarified.

METHODS

From January 2003 to January 2012, 11 patients with completely dislocated hangman's fracture underwent combined anterior-posterior fixation and fusion at our institution; an anterior-posterior approach was used in 9 patients, and an anterior-posterior-anterior approach was used in 2 patients. The operative time, hospital duration, neurological improvement, fusion rate, and complications were assessed.

RESULTS

The operation times of the 2 anterior-posterior-anterior surgeries (165 and 210 min) were longer than the anterior-posterior approach surgeries (mean, 133 min; range: 110-155 min). The average hospital duration was 8.5 days (range: 7.0-13.0 d). Postoperative reduction and solid fusion were achieved in all patients. Neurological status was significantly improved, as the mean Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score significantly increased from a preoperative score of 8.9±1.7 to 14.6±1.6 at the final follow-up (P<0.01). The mean neurological recovery rate was 51%. Moderate postoperative neck pain occurred in 2 patients, which was relieved after 2 months of conservative treatment with oral celecoxib. The mean visual analog scale pain score was 1.4±0.8 at the last assessment. Hoarseness was found after surgery in 1 patient who recovered 1 month later without any treatment. No graft-related or plate-related complications occurred during the entire follow-up period.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined anterior-posterior fixation and fusion is an effective and safe treatment for completely dislocated hangman's fracture.

Management of Hangman's Fractures: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Traumatic spondylolisthesis of the axis, is a common cervical spine fracture; however, to date there is limited data available to guide the treatment of these injuries. The purpose of this review is to provide an evidence-based analysis of the literature and clinical outcomes associated with the surgical and nonsurgical management of hangman's fractures.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using PubMed (MEDLINE) and Scopus (EMBASE, MEDLINE, COMPENDEX) for all articles describing the treatment of hangman's fractures in 2 or more patients. Risk of nonunion, mortality, complications, and treatment failure (defined as the need for surgery in the nonsurgically managed patients and the need for revision surgery for any reason in the surgically managed patients) was compared for operative and nonoperative treatment methods using a generalized linear mixed model and odds ratio analysis.

RESULTS

Overall, 25 studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in our quantitative analysis. Bony union was the principal outcome measure used to assess successful treatment. All studies included documented fracture union and were included in statistical analyses. The overall union rate for 131 fractures treated nonsurgically was 94.14% [95% confidence interval (CI), 76.15-98.78]. The overall union rate for 417 fractures treated surgically was 99.35% (95% CI, 96.81-99.87). Chance of nonunion was lower in those patients treated surgically (odds ratio, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.02-0.71). There was not a significant difference in mortality between patients treated surgically (0.16%; 95% CI, 0.01%-2.89%) and nonsurgically (1.04%; 95% CI, 0.08%-11.4%) (odds ratio, 0.15; 95% CI, 0.01-2.11). Treatment failure was less likely in the surgical treatment group (0.12%; 95% CI, 0.01%-2.45%) than the nonsurgical treatment group (0.71%; 95% CI, 0.28%-15.75%) (odds ratio 0.07; 95% CI, 0.01-0.56).

CONCLUSION

Hangman's fractures are common injuries, and surgical treatment leads to an increase in the rate of osteosynthesis/fusion without significantly increasing the rate of complication. Both an anterior and a posterior approach result in a high rate of fusion, and neither approach seems to be superior.

A novel classification for atypical Hangman fractures and its application: A retrospective observational study

Atypical Hangman fractures (AHF) were first formally reported and considered to be more often associated with neurologic deficit in 1993. However, there is a paucity of literature focusing on these fractures. The purpose of the retrospective study was to introduce a new classification scheme for AHF and its application.Sixty-two patients with Hangman fractures were identified. There were 46 (74.2%, 46/62) AHF patients, including 29 type I, 9 type II, 5 type IIa, and 3 type III fractures (Levine-Edwards classification). Based on fracture patterns, incidence, and their impact on neurologic status, a primary classification for AHF was devised. The clinical features of AHF were observed, and a new classification was introduced. The appropriate treatment strategy of AHF was discussed.Of 46 AHF patients, 27 underwent surgical treatment (24 with posterior approach with screw-rod fixation and fusion, 1 with anterior approach by C2/3 discectomy and fusion, and 2 with anterior and posterior approach), and the remaining 19 patients underwent nonoperative treatment. No patient complained severe neck pain at final follow-up. Neurologic status improved 1 to 2 grade in 12 cases with neurologic deficit. All patients achieved bony fusion within the follow-up period.AHF should be recognized as a distinct fracture subtype. The new classification for AHF is based on the feature of fracture patterns, injury mechanism, incidence, and their impact on neurologic deficit. And the new classification is complementary to Levine-Edwards.

Burst C2 Fractures Combined with Traumatic Spondylolisthesis: Can Atlantoaxial Motion Be Preserved? Including Some Technical Tips for Reduction and Fixation

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective comparative clinical case series.

OBJECTIVE

Burst C2 fractures are very rare. Treatment options include conservative treatment or fusion (anterior, posterior, or anterior and posterior). Anterior fusion addresses mainly hangman component. The bursting body usually needs posterior or combined anterior-posterior fusion, but both permanently sacrifice atlantoaxial motion. Can anterior-"first" approach preserve C1-C2 motion and restore function?

METHODS

We report nine cases of burst C2 combined with C2-C3 spondylolisthesis and an odontoid fracture. The surgical group included six patients treated initially with an anterior approach, moving to a posterior one when necessary. All were treated with anterior diskectomy fusion using one session and one incision. The halo group included three patients treated conservatively using halo traction followed by rigid collar. Assessments included self-reported, physiologic, and functional measures. Reduction was assessed using Roy-Camille's criteria and improvement of canal compression ratio. Clinical outcome was graded excellent, very good, good, or poor according to pain, range of motion, and work status.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 44.5 ± 8.3 (range 36.0 to 62.0) weeks. Results in the surgical group were judged to be excellent in four and good in two. One patient developed atlantoaxial osteoarthritis. Results were good in one patient and poor in two patients in the halo group. Two patients developed atlantoaxial osteoarthritis. All three cases had work limitations.

CONCLUSION

A single anterior approach achieved union and preserved C1-C2 motion and function in some cases. Conservative treatment achieved union but failed to achieve good reduction or good clinical outcome in grossly instable fractures. However, we believe that the ideal management is yet to evolve.

Anterior discectomy/corpectomy and fusion with internal fixation for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures: a retrospective study of 38 cases

OBJECT

The object of this study was to describe the authors' method of anterior discectomy/corpectomy and fusion combined with internal fixation for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures and to evaluate the clinical and radiological outcomes.

METHODS

This study included 38 consecutive patients who underwent surgery for unstable hangman's fractures between July 2002 and October 2011 and were followed up for more than 2 years. The patients were 18 women and 20 men with a mean age of 42.8 years (range 20–69 years). The fracture resulted from a fall in 9 patients, a motor vehicle accident in 21 patients, and a motorcycle accident in 8 patients. The Levine-Edwards classification was Type II in 13 patients, Type IIA in 20 patients, and Type III in 5 patients. All patients underwent anterior C2–3 intervertebral disc excision or C-3 corpectomy, decompression and reduction, interbody implantation of an autologous iliac bone graft, and internal fixation with a titanium plate. Pain was assessed before and after surgery using a visual analog scale (VAS). Myelopathy was graded using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Patient satisfaction with the surgery was assessed using Odom's grading system. Anteroposterior, lateral, and dynamic (flexion/extension) radiographs were obtained during the follow-up period. Two-dimensional CT studies with sagittal and coronal reconstructions were routinely performed.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up period was 49.2 months (range 24–132 months). There was a significant decrease between the preoperative and final follow-up VAS scores (mean [SD] 7.56 ± 1.52 vs 2.36 ± 1.25, p < 0.05) and a significant increase between the preoperative and final follow-up JOA scores (12.58 ± 1.34 vs 16.13 ± 1.17, p < 0.05). Postoperative radiographs showed satisfactory reduction of the fracture in all cases. Postoperative complications included transient neurological deficits (3 cases), hematoma (2 cases), temporary dysphagia (5 cases), temporary hoarseness (2 cases), prolonged pain at the iliac crest donor site (4 cases), and wound infection at the iliac crest donor site (2 cases). Solid fusion was achieved in 94.7% of patients at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Anterior discectomy/corpectomy and fusion combined with internal fixation is a safe and effective procedure for the treatment of unstable hangman's fractures.

Outcomes of surgery for unstable odontoid fractures combined with instability of adjacent segments

BACKGROUND

At present, traumatic atlantoaxial dislocation or C2-3 instability complicating odontoid fractures remains rarely reported. The aim of this study was to further investigate the surgical treatment strategies and curative effects for odontoid fractures combined with instability of adjacent segments.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of 12 patients (5 females and 7 males; age, 21-65 years) who underwent internal fixation for odontoid fractures (type II and shallow type III) and atlantoaxial instability in 6 cases, C2-3 instability in 4 cases, simultaneous C1-2 and C2-3 instability in 2 cases between January 2005 and June 2012. Accordingly, individualized surgeries were performed. Fracture healing and bone fusion were determined on X-ray scan. Upper limbs, lower limbs and sphincter functions were assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score. Frankel grading system was used for the evaluation of neurological situation.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up time of all 12 cases was 16.4 months (range, 12 to 48 months). Odontoid fracture healing was obtained in all patients within 9 months, and graft fusion was achieved within 6 months. JOA score was significantly improved from 6.3 ± 3.1 preoperatively to 11.1 ± 4.6 at 12 months after operation (P = 0.007), with 50.5 ± 25.7% recovery rate and 66.7% excellent and good rate. Except one patient still had Frankel grade B neurological injury at 12 months after surgery, the other patients improved their neurological situation (at 1 grade in Frankel scale). One patient developed wound fat liquefaction which resolved by changing the dressing. Cerebrospinal fluid leakage occurred in three patients, which resolved after the continuous drainage for 2 days.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the characteristics of odontoid fractures, the individualized operative procedure should be performed, resulting in high fracture healing rate, function recovery rate, and less, transient complications.

Computed tomography-guided C2 pedicle screw placement for treatment of unstable hangman fractures

STUDY DESIGN

Case series and description of technique.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of inserting pedicle screws in unstable Hangman fracture cases by using intraoperative CT (O-arm) based navigation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Hangman fracture, also known as traumatic spondylolisthesis of the C2, is defined as a fracture involving the lamina, articular facets, pedicles, or pars of the axis vertebra. Opinions vary regarding the optimal treatment of unstable Hangman fractures. Some authors have recommended the use of rigid orthosis, whereas others have recommended surgical stabilization. The peculiar anatomy of the upper cervical spine is highly variable, and the presence of surrounding neurovascular structures makes pedicle screw fixation even more technically challenging. The advent of intraoperative 3-dimensional navigation systems permits safe and accurate instrumentation of the cervical spine.

METHODS

Ten patients with unstable Hangman fracture, with age ranging from 17 years to 81 years, were operated under O-arm-based navigation, and screw position was confirmed with intraoperative computed tomographic scan.

RESULTS

A total of 52 screws were inserted under O-arm guidance: 20 in C2 pedicle, 20 in C3 lateral mass, and rest in C4 lateral mass. Screw misplacement was seen in only 1 C2 pedicle screw (1 of 20, 5%). No new-onset neurological deficit developed in any of the patients. Follow-up ranged from 3 months to 21 months. Bony fusion was achieved in all. Full rotation was preserved at C1-C2 joint. All the patients (50%) with neurological deficits before surgery improved after surgery.

CONCLUSION

This series demonstrates that C2 pedicle screws can be put with precision under O-arm-guided navigation, and intraoperative computed tomographic scan can confirm position of screws. Patients can be operated and mobilized early with negligible risk of screw misplacement, with preservation of motion at the C1-C2 joint.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

Simultaneous anterior and posterior screw fixations confined to the axis for stabilization of a 3-part fracture of the axis (odontoid, dens, and hangman fractures): report of 2 cases

Fractures of the axis are considered to be one of the most common injuries to the cervical spine, accounting for more than 20% of all cervical spine fractures. Multiple fractures of the axis are much rarer, accounting for 1% of all cervical fractures. Management of such complex fractures is still challenging, and there is no strong consensus for the treatment. The authors describe the cases of 2 patients who presented with 3-part fractures of the axis consisting of an odontoid Type II fracture and a Levine-Edwards Type IA fracture, which were treated with concurrent insertion of an anterior odontoid screw and bilateral posterior pedicle screws. The cases presented were characterized by 1) a Type II odontoid fracture; 2) a Type IA traumatic spondylolisthesis with no or a little translation and angulation of C-2 on C-3 in a ring fracture of the axis; and 3) no disorders at the C2-3 disc on MR images. Therefore, the authors performed surgery confined to the axis by concurrently inserting an anterior odontoid screw and posterior bilateral pedicle screws without arthrodesis of C2-3. This was followed with cervical soft collar fixation for only 1-2 weeks. The outcomes were favorable, including good osteosynthesis, high primary stability, early patient mobilization, and preserved range of motion of the cervical spine at C2-3 as well as at C1-2.

Posterior fixation and fusion of unstable Hangman's fracture by using intraoperative three-dimensional fluoroscopy-based navigation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and accuracy of posterior screw fixation for unstable Hangman's fracture using intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation.

METHODS

14 patients with unstable Hangman's fractures (11 males and 3 females), ranging in age from 21 to 59 years, received posterior fixation assisted by an intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation system: 11 Levine-Edwards type II and three type IIA cases. The American Spine Injury Association grade was D in 2 and E in 12 cases.

RESULTS

Operation time was 110 min (range 90-140 min). Hospital stay was 7.6 days (range 5-12 days). All the patients were observed for an average of 28.8 months (range 15-50 months). No screw-related injury to nerve, or vertebral artery was observed intraoperatively. An average of four screws/patient were inserted. Pedicle screws were placed into C2 and C3, and 5 screws were into the lateral mass of C3. Screw placement accuracy was evaluated using postoperative CT, according to the modified classification of Gertzbein and Robbins; one screw was grade 2 in C2, and three screws were grade 2 in the pedicle of C3. No grade 3 misplacement or clinical deficits were noted. C3 lateral mass screws were successfully inserted. Neck pain was relieved in each case. Neurologic status improved from D to E in 2 cases. Solid fusion was demonstrated in all the cases by static and dynamic films during the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This case series demonstrates that intraoperative 3D fluoroscopy-based navigation is a safe, accurate, and effective tool for screw placement in patients with unstable Hangman's fracture.