Translation and validation study of Chinese versions of the neck disability index and the neck pain and disability scale

Psychometric properties of neck disability index - a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

To evaluate the data on the psychometric properties of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched in April 2023. The random effects meta-analysis was conducted when possible.

RESULTS

Of 492 identified records, 79 were included. 70 studies were considered to be of low risk of systematic bias. Alpha was >0.81. Pooled test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.91 (95% CI 0.90-0.93). The NDI correlations with pain rating scales varied from 0.38 to 0.89. 13 studies found the NDI to be unidimensional and 15 - two- or three-dimensional. The minimal detectable change varied from 3% to 27% and minimal clinically important difference from 5% to 33%. Pooled area under the curve was 0.74 (95% CI 0.68-0.80). Most studies have not detected floor or ceiling effect. Sex-related differential item functioning has been present in one study.

CONCLUSIONS

The NDI demonstrated good internal consistency and test-retest reliability without floor or ceiling effect. In most situations, the NDI could be considered a unidimensional scale. The NDI well correlated with the common scales of pain and disability. The minimal clinically important difference and minimal detectable change were around 15% (7.5/50 points).

Adaption and psychometric evaluation of the Hindi version of Neck Disability Index in the rural population of Northern India: A cross cultural study

Background

To ensure the validity and therapeutic utility of the Neck disability index (NDI) scale, translations, cultural adaptations and psychometric evidence is necessary. This study aimed to address the absence of a suitable and validated Hindi version of the NDI for the rural population. The specific objectives were to translate, adapt, and evaluate the psychometric properties of the newly developed Hindi version of the NDI.

Methods

Following guidelines provided by the American Association of Orthopedic Surgeons, the original English NDI scale was cross-culturally adapted into Hindi. The adaptation process included translations (forward and backward), expert committee review, pre-testing and cognitive debriefing with 30 individuals experiencing chronic non-specific neck pain. The outcome of this process was the creation of the Hindi version of the NDI, termed NDI-Hi. Subsequently, NDI-Hi was administered to 211 participants with neck pain from multiple centers for psychometric testing. The evaluation involved test-retest reliability over a 48-hour interval, factor analysis, assessment of internal reliability measures, and criterion-related validity by comparing it with the NPAD-Hindi version.

Results

The NDI-Hi version exhibited favorable psychometric properties, including good test-retest reliability with an intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.87. Internal consistency of the scale was high, indicated by Cronbach's alpha coefficient (α) of 0.96. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was determined to be 2.58, and the minimal detectable change (MDC) was calculated to be 7.15. Furthermore, the NDI-Hi showed significant correlation with the NPAD-Hindi version, with a correlation coefficient (rho) of 0.86, and a p-value of less than 0.001.

Conclusions

The NDI-Hi demonstrated validity and reliability as an outcome tool for assessing neck disability. It can be effectively utilized in clinical practice and research settings involving Hindi-speaking individuals with chronic non-specific neck pain. The adapted scale is particularly well-suited for the rural Northern Indian Hindi-speaking population.

Ultrasonographic measurement indicated patients with chronic neck pain had reduced diaphragm thickness and mobility along with declined respiratory functions

BACKGROUND

Chronic neck pain (CNP) is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition including notable impairments in respiratory function. The diaphragm, serving dual roles in respiration and spinal stability, is intricately linked to the cervical spine through fascial, neurophysiological, and biomechanical connections. However, to date, none has investigated the diaphragm function in patients with CNP.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the diaphragm function, respiratory muscle strength, and pulmonary function in patients with CNP. In addition, their associations were also examined.

DESIGN

A case-control study.

METHODS

A total of 54 participants were recruited including 25 patients with CNP (CNP group) and 29 healthy adults (CON group). Pulmonary function including forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1), and respiratory muscle strength represented by maximal inspiratory (MIP) and maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), as well as diaphragm function including ultrasonographic measures of mobility and thickness changes during maximal inspiration and expiration were assessed in all participants. Additionally, the intensity of pain and disability were evaluated using a Visual Analog Scale and Neck Disability Index only in patients with CNP.

RESULTS

Significant reductions of the FVC, FEV1, MIP, and MEP were found in the CNP group compared to the CON group (p < 0.05). The diaphragm mobility and thickness changes were also significantly decreased in the CNP group than the CON group with medium effect sizes (p < 0.05). Only diaphragm thickness change was positively correlated with FVC, FEV1, and MEP in patients with CNP. Furthermore, MEP showed the strongest contribution to diaphragm thickness change based on the regression analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaired diaphragm function, respiratory muscle strength, and pulmonary function were observed in patients with CNP. Patients with smaller diaphragm thickness change had poorer pulmonary function and reduced maximal expiratory muscle strength. Diaphragm assessment and intervention may be considered in CNP management.

Translation and validation of the Urdu version of the neck pain and disability scale

PURPOSE

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the neck pain and disability scale (NPDS) into Urdu language (NPDS-U), and to investigate the NPDS-U's psychometric properties in patients with non-specific neck pain (NSNP).

METHODS

The NPDS was translated and cross-culturally adapted into Urdu in accordance with the previously described guidelines. The study included 200 NSNP patients and 50 healthy participants. The NPDS-U, Urdu version of neck disability index (NDI-U), neck Bournemouth questionnaire (NBQ), and numerical pain rating scale (NPRS) were completed by all participants. After three weeks of physiotherapy, the patients completed all of the above-mentioned questionnaires, along with the global rating of change scale. Reliability, factor analysis, validity, and responsiveness were all tested.

RESULTS

The NPDS-U demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (ICC2,1=0.92) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96). There were no floor or ceiling effects. A three-factor structure was extracted, which explained 70.42% of the total variance. The NPDS-U showed moderate to strong correlations with NPRS, NDI-U, and NBQ (r = 0.67-0.76, p < 0.001). A significant difference in the NPDS-U change scores between the stable and the improved groups (p < 0.001) confirmed its responsiveness.

CONCLUSION

The NPDS-U is a reliable, valid, and responsive scale for assessing neck pain and disability in Urdu-speaking patients with NSNP.

Simplified Chinese version of the core outcome measures index (COMI) for patients with neck pain: cross-cultural adaptation and validation

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Core Outcome Measures Index for (COMI) into a Simplified Chinese version (COMI-SC) and to evaluate the reliability and validity of COMI-SC in patients with neck pain.

METHODS

The COMI-neck was translated into Chinese according to established methods. The COMI-neck questionnaire was then completed by 122 patients with a hospital diagnosis of neck pain. Reliability was assessed by calculating Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was assessed by correlating the COMI-neck with the Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), the VAS and the Short Form (36) Health Survey (SF-36). Using confirmatory factor analysis to validate the structural, convergent and discriminant validity of the questionnaire.

RESULTS

The COMI-neck total scores were well distributed, with no floor or ceiling effects. Internal consistency was excellent (Cronbach's alpha = 0.861). Moderate to substantial correlations were found between COMI-neck and NPDS (r = 0.420/0.416/0.437, P < 0.001), NDI (r = 0.890, P < 0.001), VAS (r = 0.845, P < 0.001), as well as physical function (r = - 0.989, P < 0.001), physical role (r = - 0.597, P < 0.001), bodily pain (r = - 0. 639, P < 0.001), general health (r = - 0.563, P < 0.001), vitality (r = - 0.702, P < 0.001), social functioning (r = - 0.764, P < 0.001), role emotional (r = - 0.675, P < 0.001) and mental health (r = - 0.507, P < 0.001) subscales of the SF-36. An exploratory factor analysis revealed that the 3-factor loading explained 71.558% of the total variance [Kaiser-Mayer-Olkin (KMO) = 0.780, C2 = 502.82, P < 0.001]. CMIN/DF = 1.813, Tucker-Lewis index (TLI) = 0.966 (> 0.9), Comparative Fit Index (CFI) = 0.982 (> 0.9), Normed Fit Index (NFI) = 0.961 (> 0.9), RMSEA = 0.082 (< 0.5) indicating that the model fits well.

CONCLUSION

COMI-neck was shown to have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with non-specific chronic neck pain and could be recommended for patients in mainland China.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Diagnostic: individual cross-sectional studies with consistently applied reference standard and blinding.

Effects of online exercise intervention on physical and mental conditions in young adults with chronic neck pain

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of online exercise therapy with conventional exercise therapy for young adults with chronic neck pain. A randomized clinical trial recruiting 35 university students with self-reported chronic neck pain was conducted. The experimental group receiving 6-week online exercise therapy and active control group receiving the same face-to-face conventional exercise therapy. Visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain, Neck Disability Index (NDI), Work Limitations Questionnaire (WLQ), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and its subscales were evaluated. Both groups had improvements in VAS, NDI, HADS and WLQ scores from baseline to 6 weeks. All comparisons of changes in outcome variables between groups were not statistically significant. For young adults with chronic neck pain, both the online and conventional exercise interventions could improve their pain level, neck disability, anxiety state, and work efficiency. The online exercise intervention appeared feasible as an alternative treatment option for them.

Comparison of the effectiveness of zero-profile device and plate cage construct in the treatment of one-level cervical disc degenerative disease combined with moderate to severe paraspinal muscle degeneration

Objective

Recent evidence indicates that cervical paraspinal muscle degeneration (PMD) is a prevalent and age-related condition in patients with cervical disc degenerative disease (CDDD). However, the relationship between surgery selection and post-operative outcomes in this population remains unclear. Consequently, this study aims to investigate the disparities in clinical outcomes, radiological findings, and complications between two frequently utilized anterior cervical surgical procedures. The objective is to offer guidance for the management of PMD in conjunction with CDDD.

Methods

A total of 140 patients who underwent single-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) at our department were included in this study. The patients were divided into three groups based on the severity of PMD: mild (n=40), moderate (n=54), and severe (n=46), as determined by Goutalier fat infiltration grade. The subjects of interest were those with moderate-severe PMD, and their clinical outcomes, radiological parameters, and complications were compared between those who received a stand-alone zero-profile anchored cage (PREVAIL) and those who received a plate-cage construct (PCC).

Results

The JOA, NDI, and VAS scores exhibited significant improvement at all postoperative intervals when compared to baseline, and there were no discernible differences in clinical outcomes between the two groups. While the PCC group demonstrated more pronounced enhancements and maintenance of several sagittal alignment parameters, such as the C2-7 angle, FSU angle, C2-7 SVA, and T1 slope, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The incidence of dysphagia in the zero-profile group was 22.41% at one week, which subsequently decreased to 13.79% at three months and 3.45% at the final follow-up. In contrast, the plate cage group exhibited a higher incidence of dysphagia, with rates of 47.62% at one week, 33.33% at three months, and 11.90% at the final follow-up. Notably, there were significant differences in the incidence of dysphagia between the two groups within the first three months. However, the fusion rate, occurrence of implant subsidence, and adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) were comparable at the final follow-up.

Conclusion

For patients with one-level cervical disc degenerative disease combined with paraspinal muscle degeneration, both the zero-profile technique and PCC have demonstrated efficacy in ameliorating clinical symptoms and maintaining the postoperative sagittal balance. Although no significant disparities were observed between these two technologies in terms of complications such as adjacent segment degeneration and implant subsidence, the zero-profile technique exhibited superior performance over PCC in relation to dysphagia during the early stages of postoperative recovery. To validate these findings, studies with longer follow-up periods and evaluations of multilevel cervical muscles are warranted.

Psychometric validation of the simplified Chinese Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale in patients with chronic nonspecific neck pain

INTRODUCTION

Reliable and valid measurement tools are crucial for clinical practice in chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNSNP). The Copenhagen Neck Functional Disability Scale (CNFDS) is a widely used scale in neck pain assessment and has its unique advantages, but it is not available for patients with CNSNP in southern China.

OBJECTIVE

To develop the simplified Chinese version of CNFDS (CNFDS-SC) cross-culturally and to investigate its measurement properties in patients with CNSNP.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Validation of neck pain measurement scale in southern China.

PATIENTS

One hundred five patients with CNSNP.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Internal consistency and test-retest reliability were evaluated using Cronbach's alpha and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), respectively. Construct validity and structural validity were validated by hypothesis testing and exploratory factor analysis, respectively. Internal and external responsiveness were validated. Interpretability was revealed by the standard error of measurement (SEM) and smallest detectable change (SDC).

RESULTS

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.77 for first test and 0.84 for retest) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.95) were satisfactory. CNFDS-SC scores showed strong correlations with the numeric rating scale (NRS), the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and the Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) scores (r = 0.652, 0.763, and 0.719, respectively; p < .001). Factor analysis revealed a one-factor structure of the scale. Regarding responsiveness, the standardized response mean (SRM) and the Guyatt's responsiveness index (GRI) were 1.29 and 2.12, respectively. CNFDS-SC change scores showed good correlations with the anchoring question (r = 0.619, p < .001), NDI (r = 0.439, p = .001), and NPQ (r = 0.438 p = .001) change scores; the area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.89 (p < .001). The SEM and SDC were 0.93 and 2.57, respectively. No floor or ceiling effect and no missing items were observed.

CONCLUSION

The CNFDS-SC was demonstrated with adequate reliability, validity, responsiveness, and interpretability. The CNFDS-SC could be an effective tool for the clinical assessment of patients with CNSNP in southern China.

The Effect of ISBT-Bowen Therapy in the Treatment of Myofascial Neck Pain-a Randomized, Single-Blinded Clinical Trial

Background

Myofascial pain syndrome (MPS) is the most common diagnosis in patient presenting with chronic non-specific neck pain. It affects people's work performance, productivity, and quality of life. To date, there is little research evaluating the effectiveness of non-invasive techniques, such as ISBT-Bowen Therapy in managing neck MPS.

Objectives

To investigate the effectiveness of Bowen therapy in managing myofascial pain syndrome with symptoms lasting for more than six weeks. The study will also examine the long-term effect of ISBT-Bowen Therapy on functional enhancement, quality of life, and physical and mental well-being.

Methods

This is a prospective, single-blinded randomized controlled trial (RCT). A total of 90 myofascial neck pain patients were recruited and randomized to receive 8 sessions of ISBT-Bowen Therapy over a 12-week period (n = 45) or to continue their usual conventional treatment (n = 45). Pressure pain threshold (PPT), cervical range of motion (CROM), numerical rating pain scores, Neck Disability Index (NDI), SF-12 Health Survey (SF-12) Version 2, Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item (GAD7), and Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) were measured at baseline, 12 weeks, and 24 weeks after baseline.

Results

When compared with the control group, PPT significantly increased after ISBT-Bowen Therapy at 12 and 24 weeks. CROM on flexion, lateral flexion, and rotation were greatly improved at 12 weeks after Bowen therapy, and maintained at 24 weeks, except left lateral flexion. NDI, GAD7, and PHQ9 were all reduced after Bowen Therapy at both 12 and 24 weeks. Both Physical and Mental Component Summary scores of SF-12 were improved after Bowen therapy at 12 and 24 weeks.

Conclusions

This study confirmed the efficacy of ISBT-Bowen Therapy for patients with MPS. It alleviates pain, improves functional outcomes, enhances quality of life, and relieves mood symptoms.

Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability and validity tests of the Chinese version of the Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire

OBJECTIVE

To translate and culturally adapt the Profile Fitness Mapping neck questionnaire (ProFitMap-neck) into the Chinese version and evaluate its psychometric properties.

METHODS

The procedure of translation and cross-cultural adaptation was performed according to the recommended guidelines. A total of 220 patients with chronic neck pain (CNP) and 100 individuals without neck pain participated in the study. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity and construct validity were investigated.

RESULTS

The Chinese version of ProFitMap-neck (CHN-ProFitMap-neck) showed adequate internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.88-0.95). A good test-retest reliability was proven by the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC_3A,1 = 0.78-0.86). Floor-ceiling effects were absent. Exploratory factor analysis revealed 6 factors for the symptom scale and 4 factors for the function scale. The CHN-ProFitMap-neck showed a moderate to high negative correlation with NDI (r = 0.46-0.60, P < 0.01), a small to moderate negative correlation with VAS (r = 0.29-0.36, P < 0.01), and a small to high positive correlation with SF-36 (r = 0.21-0.52, P < 0.01). No significant correlation between the CHN-ProFitMap-neck function scale and VAS (P > 0.05) or the mental health domain of the SF-36 was found (P > 0.05). The CHN-ProFitMap-neck scores were significantly lower in the CNP group than in the non-CNP group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The CHN-ProFitMap-neck had acceptable psychometric properties and could be used as a reliable and valid instrument in the assessment of patients with chronic neck pain in mainland China.

Comparison of time-dependent resistance isometric exercise and active range of motion exercise in alleviating the sensitization of postoperative axial pain after cervical laminoplasty

BACKGROUND

Postoperative axial pain (PAP) is a significant complication after cervical laminoplasty.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate pain sensitization in PAP patients and effects of time-dependent resistance isometric exercise compared to active range-of-motion exercise on PAP.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

211 patients undergoing postoperative 12-week exercises were evaluated for pressure pain threshold (PPT), temporal summation (TS) and both cross-sectional area and fatty infiltration of paraspinal muscles preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. There patients underwent Numeric rating pain scale (NRS) and neck disability index (NDI) 3 and 6 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

At postoperative 3-month assessments, fewer patients undergoing isometric exercise showed PAP compared to range-of-motion exercise group (14/98 vs. 34/113; P = 0.006), and pain-related assessments in the former were lower than the latter (NRS at rest: 0.3 ± 0.8 vs. 0.7 ± 1.4, P = 0.014; NRS with movements: 0.4 ± 1.0 vs. 1.0 ± 1.7, P = 0.015; NDI: 2.4 ± 6.3 vs. 6.7 ± 10.9, P = 0.002). Postoperative cross-sectional area was smaller in isometric exercise group (603.5 ± 190.2) than in range-of-motion exercise group (678.7 ± 215.5) (P = 0.033), and the former showed higher local-area PPT and lower TS than the latter (PPT: 3.9 ± 1.8 vs. 3.1 ± 1.6, P = 0.002; TS: 1.8 ± 0.9 vs. 2.2 ± 1.0, P = 0.003). PAP patients showed lower local-area PPT and greater TS than those without PAP in both isometric (PPT: 2.8 ± 0.7 vs. 4.0 ± 1.9, P = 0.019; TS: 2.4 ± 0.6 vs. 1.7 ± 0.9, P = 0.011) and range-of-motion (PPT: 2.2 ± 0.9 vs. 3.6 ± 1.7, P < 0.001; TS: 2.8 ± 0.8 vs. 1.9 ± 0.9, P < 0.001) exercise groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Both peripheral and central sensitization are involved in PAP. Time-dependent isometric exercise has more positive effects on PAP than range-of-motion exercise because of its advantages in improving pain sensitization.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Temporary Spinal Cord Stimulation versus Pulsed Radiofrequency for Postherpetic Neuralgia: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Objectives

The objective of this study is to compare the safety and effectiveness of the temporary spinal cord stimulation (SCS) versus pulsed radiofrequency (PRF) in treating postherpetic neuralgia (PHN).

Methods

From September 1, 2019, to May 30, 2020, 44 PHN patients admitted to the Pain Department of the Foshan First People's Hospital, China were enrolled in this study. The patients were randomly assigned to SCS and PRF groups in a ratio of 1 : 1 and were given respective therapy for 8 days. Rash, in all patients, was located in the trunk and extremities of the spinal nerve (C4-L5), and the pain intensity was greater than or equal to 7 points on the VAS scale. Subsequently, we evaluated the visual analogue scale (VAS), efficiency rate (ER), complete remission rate (CRR), daily sleep interference score (SIS), patient health questionnaire (PHQ-9), generalized anxiety disorder assessment (GAD-7), bodily pain (BP), and physical function (PF) sections of the 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36) at the following time points: presurgery, as well as 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months postsurgery.

Results

The final analysis was performed on 40 patients (n = 20 SCS cohort, and n = 20 PRF cohort). Both cohorts exhibited comparable baseline values (P > 0 : 05). Particularly, they were similar in age, sex, pain duration, involved dermatome, and comorbidity. Among the variables that demonstrated marked improvements from presurgical data to 1 week postsurgery were VAS, ER, CRR, SIS, PHQ-9, GAD-7, as well as BP and PF of the SF-36 in both cohorts. In addition, this improvement persisted for 6 months. There was no complication related to surgery in any of our patients.

Conclusion

Based on our analysis, SCS exhibited better efficacy and safety than PRF. This study was prospectively registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR2100050647).

Novel Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Intervertebral Disc Injection of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Cervicodiscogenic Pain: A Case Report and Technical Note

Ultrasound-guided needle placement into the cervical intervertebral discs using a lateral-to-medial approach is reportedly possible. Clinically, however, patients commonly present with very high uncovertebral joints or narrowed intervertebral spaces, making the method difficult or impossible. This report presents a novel ultrasound-guided needle placement technique to the cervical intervertebral discs using a more medial approach between the trachea/thyroid gland and the carotid sheath. A patient presented with neck pain radiating to the right shoulder and right-sided interscapular regions that affected his sleep and daily functioning. Physiotherapy, selective nerve root block, and percutaneous endoscopic right C7 laminotomy did not sufficiently improve his condition, which progressed to bilateral interscapular and bilateral shoulder pain. Provocative discography was performed with injection of leukocyte-poor and red blood cell-poor platelet-rich plasma to provoke the discogenic pain, which was treated with platelet-rich plasma mixed with lidocaine. The patient recovered well. A month later, there was a significant decrease in the neck disability index score from the initial 28/50 to 14, and there was a further decrease to 5 after 2 months. In conclusion, this medial approach of ultrasound-guided cervical disc needle placement is feasible, even in patients where disc access by previously described approaches is impossible.

Alterations in kinematics of temporomandibular joint associated with chronic neck pain

BACKGROUND

Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is an umbrella term for pain and dysfunction of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) and its associated structures. Patients with TMD show changes in TMJ kinematics and masticatory muscle activation. TMD is commonly comorbid with non-specific chronic neck pain (NCNP), which may be one of the risk factors for TMD.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate whether patients with NCNP have altered TMJ kinematics and masticatory muscle activity.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional exploratory study including 19 healthy participants and 20 patients with NCNP but without TMD symptoms. TMJ kinematics was measured during mouth opening and closing, jaw protrusion and jaw lateral deviation. Surface electromyography was used to record the muscle activity of the anterior temporalis, masseter, sternocleidomastoid and upper trapezius while clenching. Furthermore, cervical posture, cervical range of motion (ROM) and pressure-pain threshold of the neck and masticatory muscles were measured.

RESULTS

Compared with the healthy group, the NCNP group showed significantly reduced upper cervical rotation ROM (p = .041) and increased condylar path length (p = .02), condylar translation (opening p = .034, closing p = .011) and mechanical pain sensitivity of the upper trapezius (p = .018). Increased condylar translation was significantly correlated with reduced upper cervical mobility and poor cervical posture (r = -0.322 to -0.397; p = .012-.046).

CONCLUSION

Increased condylar translation and path length in patients with NCNP may indicate poor control of TMJ articular movement, which may result from neck pain or may be a compensation for limited neck mobility. Evaluation of excessive TMJ translation may be considered in patients with NCNP.

Translation, Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire: Persian Version

Introduction: The Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (NBQ) is being used widely in various countries. This study evaluated the validity and reliability of the Persian version of NBQ.

Methods: This methodological study investigated 170 patients with chronic neck pain (NP). The psychometric properties of NBQ were evaluated in two stages. First, the standard scale was translated based on Guillemin’s guidelines for cross-cultural adaption and face validity tested in a pilot group (N=25). Second, it was conducted on a sample of 170 diverse chronic pain patients. Construct validity was determined with convergent validity by short-form McGill pain questionnaire. Then, the reliability was confirmed using Cronbach’s alpha and the intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results: The instrument demonstrated a good face validity and the participants made minor changes. A slight change was applied on content validity. In construct validity, Pearson’s correlation coefficient was 0.85, which was statistically significant and showed strong correlation. A Cronbach’s alpha of 0.87 was obtained. This confirmed the remarkable internal consistency and stability (0.92).

Conclusion: The Persian version of NBQ showed a good internal consistency and reliability and it could be considered as a valuable tool for assessing patients with cervical pain in Iranian population.

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Simplified Chinese Version of the Copenhagen Neck Function Disability Scale

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

OBJECTIVE

Th aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt Copenhagen Neck Function Disability Scale into a Simplified Chinese version (CNFDS-C), and evaluate the reliability and validity of CNFDS-C in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The CNFDS is a reliable and valid evaluation instrument for chronic neck pain. However, Simplified Chinese version of CNFDS hasn't been validated.

METHODS

A total of 150 participants were included in this study. Internal consistency was estimated according to Cronbach alpha. Test-retest reliability was assessed by intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC). Construct validity was analyzed by correlations between CNFDS-C and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) as well as the short form (36) health survey (SF-36).

RESULTS

The original version of the CNFDS was cross-culturally adapted and translated into Simplified Chinese. CNFDS-C was indicated to have excellent reliability (Cronbach alpha = 0.810, ICC = 0.927). Moderate to substantial correlations between CNFDS-C and NDI (r = 0.642, P < 0.001), VAS (r = 0.581, P < 0.001), as well as Physical Function (r = -0.583, P < .001), Role Physical (r = -0.478, P < 0.001), Bodily Pain (r = -0.610, P < 0.001), and General Health (r = -0.439, P < 0.001) subscales of SF-36 were observed.

CONCLUSION

CNFDS-C was demonstrated to have acceptable reliability and validity in patients with nonspecific chronic neck pain, which could be recommended for patients in Chinese mainland.Level of Evidence: 3.

Ultrasound-Guided Transforaminal Injections of Platelet-Rich Plasma Compared with Steroid in Lumbar Disc Herniation: A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study

Transforaminal steroid injection is extensively used as a treatment in cases of herniated disc, but it is associated with complications. In comparison, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection has been used in musculoskeletal disorders and could be another option. This study is aimed at comparing the efficacy and safety aspects between ultrasound-guided transforaminal injections of PRP and steroid in patients who suffer from radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation. In a randomized controlled trial, ultrasound-guided transforaminal injections of either PRP (n = 61) or steroid (n = 63) were administered to a total of 124 patients who suffer from radicular pain due to lumbar disc herniation. Patients were assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS), pressure pain thresholds (PPTs), Oswestry disability index (ODI), and the physical function (PF) and bodily pain (BP) domains of the 36-item short form health survey (SF-36) before operation and 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after operation. The rate and latency of F-wave were obtained before operation and 12 months postoperation. There was no statistical difference in terms of age and sex between both groups. Statistically significant improvements from the patients' data before operation to data obtained 1-month postoperation were observed in VAS, PPTs, ODI, and PF and BP of SF-36 in both groups and kept for 1 year. F-wave rate and latency were improved significantly at 1-year postoperation in both groups. Intergroup differences during follow-ups over a period of 1 year were not found to be significant in all the above assessment between the PRP and steroid groups. No complications were reported. The results showed similar outcome for both transforaminal injections using PRP and steroid in the treatment of lumbar disc herniation, suggesting the possible application of PRP injection as a safer alternative. The trial was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR-INR-17011825).

Reliability and Validity of Cross Culturally Adapted Punjabi Version of NDI (NDI-P) in Patients with Neck Pain: A Psychometric Analysis

BACKGROUND

Neck disability index (NDI) is one of the commonest patient-reported outcome measures used to evaluate disability related to neck pain. Its application to non-English-speaking Punjabi population is limited as a validated and cross-culturally adapted Punjabi version of NDI is not available. The purpose of the study was to analyze the psychometric properties of Punjabi version of neck disability index (NDI-P) in patients with neck pain.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The translation and cross-cultural adaptation of Punjabi version of NDI was done according to well-recommended guidelines. The pre-final version was tested on a set of 15 patients and suitable modifications were made. The final version was administered to 100 patients with neck pain of more than 2 weeks duration. Psychometric properties comprising internal consistency, test-re-test reliability, construct validity and factorial structure of the questionnaire were determined.

RESULTS

The developed NDI-P showed excellent internal consistency (Chronbach alpha of NDI-P is 0.87), test-re-test reliability (ICC 0.840) and construct validity (Spearman correlation coefficient with VAS 0.547). Factor analysis proved the questionnaire to be having a 2-factor structure with a total variance of 56.58%.

CONCLUSION

NDI (P) is a reliable and valid instrument for measurement of disability related to neck pain in Punjabi population. It can be used both in research and clinical care settings in future.

Validation of the Nepali versions of the Neck Disability Index and the Numerical Rating Scale for Neck Pain

STUDY DESIGN

A cross-sectional study with a test-retest design.

OBJECTIVE

To translate and culturally adapt the numerical rating scale (NRS) for neck pain intensity and the Neck Disability Index (NDI), and asses their measurement properties in a Nepalese neck pain population.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neck pain is one of the most common musculoskeletal disorders in Nepal. Research on neck pain disorders has been hampered by lack of standardized patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in Nepali language. Therefore, we aimed at validating a Nepali version of the NDI and NRS neck pain.

METHODS

At Dhulikhel hospital in Nepal, 150 patients with neck pain and/or cervical radiculopathy completed the translated self-administered questionnaires. We had made one cultural adaption of the NDI driving item in the final Nepali version. Relative reliability was analyzed with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC 2.1) and absolute reliability with the smallest detectable change (SDC). Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach alpha. Construct and discriminative validity was assessed by Spearman correlation for a priori hypotheses, receiver-operating characteristics curves, and analysis of variance. Time spent and assistance needed to complete the questionnaires were used to assess feasibility.

RESULTS

Test-restest reliability was excellent with ICC (95% confidence intervals) of 0.87 (0.66, 0.94) for NDI and 0.97 (0.94, 0.99) for NRS neck pain. The absolute reliability was acceptable (a SDC of 1.6 for NRS and 9.3 for NDI) and a Cronbach alpha (internal consistency) of 0.70 for NDI, as well as acceptable construct validity, discriminative validity, and feasibility.

CONCLUSION

The Nepali versions of the NRS neck pain and NDI can be recommended for assessing pain and disability among patients with neck pain and cervical radiculopathy, but their responsiveness to change remains to be tested.Level of Evidence: 2.

Efficacy and safety of Shi-style cervical manipulation therapy for treating acute and subacute neck pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Background

Neck pain is a common clinical disease, which seriously affects people’s mental health and quality of life and results in loss of social productivity. Improving neck pain’s curative effect and reducing its recurrence rate are major medical problems. Shi’s manipulation therapy has unique advantages and technical features that aid in the diagnosis and treatment of neck pain. Compared with first-line non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment of neck pain, Shi’s cervical manipulation lacks the relevant research basis of therapeutic advantage, safety, and satisfaction for treating acute and subacute neck pain. Herein, we aim to confirm our hypothesis in a clinical trial that the safety and efficacy of Shi’s cervical manipulation will be more effective, safer, and more satisfactory than NSAIDs to treat acute and subacute neck pain.

Methods

In this multicenter, positive-controlled, randomized clinical trial, traditional analgesic drug (NSAID) is used to evaluate and show that Shi’s manipulation is more effective, safe, and satisfactory for treating acute and subacute neck pain. Overall, 240 subjects are randomly divided into the trial and control groups, with both groups treated by the corresponding main intervention method for up to 12 weeks. Clinical data will be collected before the intervention and immediately after the first treatment; at 3 days and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks after the intervention; and at 26 and 52 weeks after treatment follow-up of clinical observation index data collection. The clinical observation indices are as follows: (1) cervical pain is the primary observation index, measured by Numerical Rating Scale. The secondary indices include the following: (2) cervical dysfunction index, measured by patient self-evaluation using cervical Neck Disability Index; (3) cervical activity measurement, measured by the cervical vertebra mobility measurement program of Android mobile phone system; (4) overall improvement, measured by patient self-evaluation with SF-36; and (5) satisfactory treatment, determined by patient self-evaluation.

Discussion

We will discuss whether Shi’s cervical manipulation has greater advantages in efficacy, safety, and satisfaction of acute and subacute neck pain than traditional NSAIDs, to provide a scientific basis for the dissemination and application of Shi’s cervical manipulation.

Trial registration

China Registered Clinical Trial Registration Center ChiCTR1900021371. Registered on 17 February 2019

Questionnaires for the evaluation of the cervical and lumbar spine in Italian language: a systematic review of the structural and psychometric characteristics

INTRODUCTION

There has been an increase in the use of questionnaires as tools for the subjective evaluation of patients with neuro-musculoskeletal problems. The aim of this study was to analyze the psychometric properties of the questionnaires published in Italian for the evaluation of cervical and lumbar spine pain and related dysfunction.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Two blinded bibliographical searches were carried out on seven databases, regarding back, lumbar and/or cervical musculoskeletal problems. Both the structural characteristics and the psychometric aspects of each of the questionnaires were extracted from each of the selected articles. The structural characteristics were: full name, acronym, author and date of adaptation to the Italian language, what it measures, number of items, time to complete, the result scale, where the points are located and the cost. The psychometric aspects were: standard error of measurement (SEM), minimum detectable change (MDC), minimal clinically important difference (MCID), test-retest reliability, internal consistency, criterion validity, construct validity and sensitivity to changes.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

For the structural characteristics of the questionnaires identified for the valuation of the lumbar area, the number of items ranged between 10 and 24. Only two of the questionnaires presented specific categories, and the time to complete ranged between 5 and 7 minutes. The reliability of the questionnaires ranged between 0.869 and 0.961. None of the questionnaires calculated the inter-observer reliability. The internal consistency ranged between 0.82 and 0.90 for criterion validity. None of the questionnaires calculated sensitivity, SEM, MDC or MCID, with the exception of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire, which showed a value of 12 on MDC. For the assessment of the cervical region, the number of items ranged from 6 to 20. Three of the questionnaires had sub-categories, and the time to complete them ranged between 2 and 5 minutes. The test-retest reliability ranged between 0.78 and 0.997. The internal consistency ranged between 0.842 and 0.942.

CONCLUSIONS

The Italian versions of the questionnaires present good basic structural and psychometric characteristics for the evaluation of patients with back, lumbar and/or cervical musculoskeletal disorders. The analysis of the structural and psychometric characteristics of these questionnaires is fundamental to identify the best tools to use in research and in clinical practice.

Simplified Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

PURPOSE

This study aimed to validate the simplified Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) for Chinese patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM).

METHODS

The construct validity was conducted using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). The convergent validity was based on factor loading, composite reliability (CR), and Pearson correlation coefficients (r). Internal consistency reliability was evaluated using Cronbach's α, test-retest reliability using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC), and the ceiling and floor effects were also examined.

RESULTS

A total of 168 native Chinese-speaking patients were enrolled. The CFA indicated that construct validity did not meet the preset criteria to be considered as good. Except for Q 4-1, the factor loading was higher than the standard of 0.5, and the CR values ranged from 0.70 to 0.85. Strong to moderate correlations were found between other scales and the simplified Chinese JOACMEQ. The scale showed good internal consistency reliability (Cronbach's α 0.639-0.821), and test-retest reliability (ICC 0.760-0.916). Moreover, the ceiling effect was displayed from Q1 to Q4.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicates that the simplified Chinese JOACMEQ is a reliable and valid measure of the functional status among Chinese patients with CSM.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe JOACMEQ was translated into the simplified Chinese and culturally adapted for Chinese-speaking patients with CSM for the first time.The simplified JOACMEQ demonstrated an excellent level of internal consistency and good test-retest reliability.The simplified Chinese JOACMEQ was reliable and valid for the measurement of the functional status among the patients with CSM.

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation of the Malay version of the Neck Disability Index

Purpose: Translating the Neck Disability Index (NDI) into the Malay language (NDI-M); evaluation of psychometric properties in patients with neck pain.Methods: The NDI-M was translated according to established guidelines. In the first visit, 120 participants completed the NDI-M, visual analogue scale (VAS) for pain and demographic details. 98 participants returned to complete similar questionnaires and the Global Rating of Change (GRoC) scale. The NDI-M was evaluated for internal consistency, test-retest reliability, content validity, construct validity and responsiveness.Results: The NDI-M demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.84) and good test-retest reliability (ICC_2,1 = 0.79). Content validity was confirmed with no floor or ceiling effects. Construct validity was established revealing three-factor subscales explaining 68% of the total variance. The NDI-M showed a moderate correlation with VAS (R_p = 0.49, p < 0.001). Regarding responsiveness, a moderate correlation between NDI-M change scores and VAS change scores was found (R_p = 0.40, p < 0.001). However, there was no significant correlation between NDI-M with GRoC (R_s = 0.11, p = 0.27).Conclusions: The NDI-M is a reliable and valid tool to measure functional outcomes in patients with neck pain. It is responsive in detecting changes in pain intensity during a patient's rehabilitation journey.Implications for rehabilitationThe NDI was translated into the Malay language and culturally adapted for Malay-speaking patients with neck pain.The NDI-M demonstrated an excellent level of internal consistency and good test-retest reliability. It demonstrated content and construct validity, with three-factor subscales, and moderate responsiveness for pain intensity.The NDI-M is a reliable, valid and responsive instrument to measure functional limitations in patients with neck pain for rehabilitation.

Cross-cultural Adaptation, Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the Simplified-Chinese Version of Neck Disability Index

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric evaluation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to translate the Neck Disability Index (NDI) into the simplified-Chinese language and to evaluate the reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the new questionnaire.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neck pain is a major health problem resulting in major disability. NDI is the most frequently used scale for self-rating of disability due to neck pain. At present, there is no simplified-Chinese version of the NDI. The aims of this study were to culturally adapt and translate the NDI into the simplified-Chinese language (NDI-SC) and to evaluate its psychometric properties in patients with neck pain.

METHODS

The NDI was translated into simplified-Chinese version based on established guidelines. A total of 70 patients participated in this study. Patients were asked to complete a set of questionnaires comprising of their demographic information, the NDI-SC, and a visual analog scale (VAS) of pain. Fifty-six patients returned after 1 to 2 weeks to complete the same set of questionnaires and the global rating of change (GROC) scale. Then, the NDI-SC was evaluated for content validity, construct validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and responsiveness.

RESULTS

The NDI-SC demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach α = 0.92) and good test-retest reliability (ICC2,1 = 0.85). Content validity was confirmed as no floor or ceiling effects were detected for the NDI-SC total score. Construct validity was established with factor analysis revealing two-factor subscales explaining 66% of the variance. The NDI-SC showed a strong correlation with VAS (Rp = 0.61, P < 0.001) and a moderate correlation with GROC (Rs = 0.46, P < 0.001). The correlation between NDI-SC change scores and VAS change scores was also moderate (Rp = 0.59, P < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

The results showed that the NDI-SC is a reliable, valid, and responsive instrument to measure functional limitations in patients with neck pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Comparison of 10-year Outcomes of Bryan Cervical Disc Arthroplasty for Myelopathy and Radiculopathy

Objective

To evaluate the long‐term efficacy of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty in the treatment of myelopathy patients compared with radiculopathy patients.

Methods

This study is a prospective study. Sixty‐six patients (38 patients in myelopathy group and 28 patients in radiculopathy group) who were treated with Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty between 2004 and 2007 and followed for 10 years were included in this study. The Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and Odom's criteria were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. X‐ray, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) were used to evaluate the radiographic outcomes including the global range of motion (ROM), segmental ROM, and segment alignment before the surgery and at last follow‐up. The incidence of segmental kyphosis, segmental mobility lost, and the grade of paravertebral ossification (PO) were also evaluated at last follow‐up.

Results

The JOA score and NDI improved in both groups. Thirty‐three of 38 patients in myelopathy group and all patients in radiculopathy group reported good or excellent outcomes according to Odom's criteria. The segmental ROM was (9.5° ± 4.4°) before surgery and maintained at (9.0° ± 5.5°) at last follow‐up in myelopathy group. The segmental ROM was (9.5° ± 4.6°) and (9.0° ± 5.3°) before surgery and at last follow‐up in radiculopathy group, respectively. The Bryan prosthesis remained mobile at last follow‐up for 30 patients (78.9%) in the myelopathy group and 22 patients (78.6%) in the radiculopathy group. Of the patients in the myelopathy group, 21.1% developed segmental kyphosis, as did 21.4% of patients in the radiculopathy group. The incidence of PO and high‐grade PO was 92.1 and 28.9% in the myelopathy group, and was 92.9 and 32.1% in the radiculopathy group. There was no significant difference between both groups.

Conclusions

Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty was an effective and safe technique in treating patients with myelopathy. The clinical and radiographic outcomes in the myelopathy group were similar to those in the radiculopathy group at the 10‐year follow‐up.

Randomized Trial on Comparison of the Efficacy of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Dry Needling in Myofascial Trigger Points

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to compare the efficacy of radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy and dry needling in the treatment of myofascial trigger points in the upper trapezius muscle.

DESIGN

A total of 65 patients with myofascial trigger points were randomly divided into extracorporeal shock wave therapy group (n = 32) and dry needling group (n = 33). Patients received 3 wks of treatment at 1-wk intervals (in both groups). Visual analog scale, pressure pain threshold, Neck Disability Index, and shear modulus were evaluated before treatment, immediately after the first therapy, 1 mo, and 3 mos after the completion of the third therapy.

RESULTS

Significant improvements of visual analog scale, pressure pain threshold, and Neck Disability Index scores were observed at all time points after treatment (P < 0.01) in both treatment groups. The shear modulus of myofascial trigger points was reduced in both dry needling group (P < 0.05) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy group (P < 0.01) immediately after the first treatment. Significant reductions in shear modulus were maintained up to 3-mo posttreatment in both groups (P < 0.01). There were no significant differences between the radial extracorporeal shock wave therapy group and dry needling group.

CONCLUSIONS

The extracorporeal shock wave therapy is as effective as dry needling for relieving pain, improving function, and reducing shear modulus for patients with myofascial trigger points after a series of three treatments.

Cross-cultural adaptation of the Neck Pain and Disability Scale: a methodological systematic review

BACKGROUND

Neck pain is a common and uncomfortable symptom, adversely affecting the work and life of those affected. The Neck Pain and Disability Scale (NPDS) is widely used in neck pain assessment. It has been cross-culturally adapted into several languages to extend its reach to non-English-speaking countries. The aim of this study was to comprehensively evaluate the translation procedures and measurement properties of cross-cultural adaptations of the NPDS.

METHOD

We searched multiple databases, including PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, SciELO, PsycINFO, Medline, SinoMed, PsycINFO, Web of Science, and Scopus, using the keywords "Neck Pain and Disability Scale," "NPDS," "cross-cultural," and "translation". Cross-cultural adaptation and quality control of measurement properties of adaptation procedures were independently conducted by two reviewers in accordance with Guidelines for the Process of Cross-Cultural Adaptation of Self-Report Measures and Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire.

RESULTS

There are 15 adaptations of NPDS in 11 different languages with multiple versions in Korean, simplified Chinese and Turkish with 19 studies. In about half of these studies, forward and back translations were conducted. Specially, they mostly focus on the synthesis phase of the translations. Only the simplified-Chinese-2011 adaptation meets the standards of composition due to the existence of an expert committee. Internal consistency, reliability, and construct validity have been evaluated in most existing eligible articles. Half of these articles tested ceiling and floor effects, and only a few included agreement responsiveness and interpretability.

CONCLUSION

The Italian (publication 1 and 2), Persian-Iranian, simplified-Chinese-2011, and Thai adaptations show better quality than others with regard to cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties. Further studies should fully assess the measurement properties of the NPDS in the Dutch (publication 1 and 2), Hindi-Indian, Korean-2013, simplified-Chinese-2010, Turkish-2004, and Turkish-2007 adaptations.

Neck pain in episodic migraine: a cross-sectional study

Purpose: It has been reported that neck pain is more prevalent in episodic migraineurs (EM) than in the general population. Subjects with episodic migraine exhibited widespread hypersensitivity in cranio-cervical region. Our objectives were to explore the potential factors associated with the presence of neck pain for EM, and whether there were differences in pericranial muscle tenderness between EM with and without neck pain.

Patients and methods: Fifty EM with neck pain (34.76±8.04) and 50 age- and sex-matched EM without neck pain (34.26±9.39) were enrolled. The characteristics of headaches and some lifestyle factors were assessed in two groups. The migraine disability score and neck disability index were also recorded. During migraine-free period, cranio-cervical muscle tenderness scores and mechanical pain threshold were assessed for all patients.

Results: There were no significant differences in pain intensity (p=0.44), migraine disability (p=0.71), duration (p=0.44) or frequency (p=0.85) of headache between EM with and without neck pain. The lifestyle factors including smoking, alcohol, coffee, body mass index≧23kg/m², poor sleeping (<8 h/day) and time spent on TV and computers (>2 h/day) were not associated with the presence of neck pain in this study. Compared with EM without neck pain, those with neck pain had higher neck tenderness (p<0.01) and higher cephalic tenderness scores (p<0.01). Neck Disability Index scores were positively correlated with neck and total muscle tenderness scores.

Conclusion: There was a significant difference in cranio-cervical muscle tenderness scores between EM with and without neck pain. For EM, the factors studied in the current research seemed not associated with the onset of neck pain, and further studies including other factors are needed.

Cross-cultural Adaptation and Validation of the Simplified-Chinese Version of Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire for Patients in Mainland China

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to develop and assess the internal reliability and structure validity of a simplified Chinese version of the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire (SC-NBQ) for evaluation of patients with nonspecific neck pain (NP) in mainland China.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The NBQ has been cross-culturally translated into several languages with good internal consistency and construct validity to evaluate low back pain and NP. However, the NBQ has been not translated or validated for Chinese-speaking patients.

METHODS

The SC-NBQ was developed by standard cross-translation procedures, and completed by 106 patients with nonspecific NP, along with other self-reported questionnaires, including the Neck Disability Index (NDI), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Functional Rating Index (FRI), and 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36). The internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity of the SC-NBQ were determined.

RESULTS

The NBQ was successfully translated into Chinese. All patients completed the SC-NBQ twice, and the other instruments. Score distribution demonstrated that there was no floor or ceiling effects of the SC-NBQ. Cronbach α coefficient (α = 0.89) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC = 0.97) showed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability. A good construct validity was shown by strong correlation with HADS (r = 0.75), NDI (r = 0.82), FRI (r = 0.90) and SF-36 physical functioning (r = 0.75), and bodily pain (r = 0.75) subscales.

CONCLUSION

The SC-NBQ demonstrated good internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity, and may be used for the evaluation of NP in Chinese-speaking patients.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Comparing the effectiveness of integrating ergonomics and motor control to conventional treatment for pain and functional recovery of work-related neck-shoulder pain: A randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Work-related neck and shoulder pain (WRNSP) is highly prevalent among patients who seek physiotherapy treatment. Clinicians may tend to focus on teaching home exercises and provide general advice about workplace improvement. The present study investigates the short- and long-term impact of an intervention approach that emphasizes on integrating the motor control re-education with ergonomic advice.

METHODS

Participants diagnosed with WRNSP (n = 101) were randomly assigned into two groups in this randomized controlled trial. The Ergo-motor Group (EM, n = 51) received an integrated intervention with ergonomic advice/modifications and motor control training individualized for each participant based on their specific work demands. Control Group (CO, n = 50) received treatment for pain relief and general exercises of their necks at a designated physiotherapy clinic. Neck pain intensity and functional outcome measures were assessed before, immediately and 1-year after the 12-week intervention programmes. Global Rating of Change Score was used to evaluate the perceived recovery at 1-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Both groups reported significant reductions in pain and functional disability scores at post-intervention (EM, n = 44; CO, n = 42) and 1-year follow-up (EM, n = 40; CO, n = 38); however, no significant between-group differences were found (p > 0.05). Significantly higher rating in global recovery score was reported in EM group at 1-year follow-up (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Intervention integrating ergonomic advice/modification with motor control exercise was found to be equally effective as pain relief and general exercise for pain and functional recovery. However, at 1-year follow-up, such integrated approach resulted in significantly better global recovery perceived by people with WRNSP.

SIGNIFICANCE

Integrating ergonomic intervention and motor control training achieved similar reduction in pain and functional outcomes compared to conventional physiotherapy at post-intervention and at 1-year follow-up, for patients with moderate level of work-related neck-shoulder pain and mild degree of functional disability. The Ergo-motor Group reported significantly better perceived overall recovery at 1-year follow-up.

Shi's Daoyin Therapy for Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Objective

To compare the immediate and short term effectiveness of Shi's Daoyin therapy (DT) rather than the Melbourne Protocol (MP) in terms of pain, mobility, and isometric strength of cervical muscles in nonacute nonspecific neck pain patients.

Material and Methods

A total of 114 nonacute nonspecific neck pain patients aged 20~50 years were recruited and randomly assigned to be treated by either Shi's DT or the MP. 56 cases and 54 cases received treatment for 3 weeks and were evaluated before and after intervention and at 3-week follow-up in Shi's DT group and MP group, respectively. The outcome measures were Chinese version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI), cervical range of motion (ROM), maximal voluntary isometric force (MVIF), and pain intensity (Numeric Pain Rating Scale, NPRS).

Results

All outcomes of both groups showed statistically significant improvements after the intervention and at 3-week follow-up (P < 0.05), while no statistically significant difference was found in NDI between groups. When followed up after 3 weeks, the ROM in axial rotation was significantly greater in the Shi's DT group (P < 0.05), and the NPRS in the Shi's DT group was significantly lower than the MP group (P < 0.05). At the end of the treatment period, the MVIF in lateral bending in the Shi's DT group had a lower value (P = 0.044) than in the MP group, but there was no significant difference in flexion and extension between the two groups.

Conclusions

Both Shi's DT and MP groups demonstrated an obvious reduction in pain intensity and improvements in neck mobility after a short term follow-up period. The improvement of Shi's DT in disability and pain during functional activities is generally similar to that of the MP for the treatment of nonacute nonspecific neck pain.

[Responsiveness of Chinese version of Neck Outcome Score in subjects with neck pain]

Objective

To analyze responsiveness of Chinese version of Neck Outcome Score (NOOS-C) and provide a reliable measure to assess intervention effect for patients with neck pain.

Methods

Cross-cultural adaptation of NOOS was performed according to the Beaton's guidelines for cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Eighty patients with neck pain were recruited between September 2016 and May 2017. Those patients were assessed using NOOS-C and Chinese version of Neck Disability Index (NDI) before and after intervention. And 71 patients completed those questionnaires. The statistic differences of the score of each subscale and the total scale before and after intervention were evaluated by paired-samples t test. Internal responsiveness was determined by effect size (ES) and standardized response mean (SRM) based on the calculated difference before and after intervention. External responsiveness was analyzed by Spearman correlation coefficient.

Results

The differences in symptom subscale, sleep disturbance subscale, participating in everyday life subscale, every day activity and pain subscale, and the scale between before and after intervention were significant ( P<0.05) except for mobility subscale ( P>0.05). The difference of NDI-C before and after intervention was -12.11%±17.45%, ES was 0.77, and SRM was 0.69. The difference of NOOS-C before and after intervention was 13.74±17.22, ES was 0.83, and SRM was 0.80. Spearman correlation analysis revealed that the relativity about NOOS-C and NDI-C before and after intervention were both negative ( r=-0.914, P=0.000; r=-0.872, P=0.000).

Conclusion

NOOS-C's responsiveness is good.

Development and Validation of Taiwanese Version of the Neck Disability Index

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-cultural adaptation and cross-sectional psychometric testing in a convenience sample of patients with neck pain.

OBJECTIVE

To translate and cross-culturally adapt the Neck Disability Index (NDI) into a Taiwanese version and to assess the psychometric properties.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The Taiwanese NDI has not been developed or validated.

METHODS

The NDI was first translated and culturally adapted to the Taiwanese version. The test-retest reliability within 1 week was examined (n = 32). The factor structure was assessed by confirmatory factor analysis (n = 137). The construct validity was assessed by examining the relationship between the NDI and other well-known measures (n = 137).

RESULTS

The Taiwanese version was successfully translated and cross-culturally adapted. The internal consistency was excellent, with Cronbach α = 0.89. High test-retest reliability was demonstrated with intraclass correlation coefficients of 0.87. The minimal detectable change was 8.74. The two-factor model (pain and function factors) was better than the one-factor model, with higher factor loadings and better goodness-of-fit statistics. The convergent validity was supported by moderate correlation of the pain factor with the Visual Analogue Scale (|rho| = 0.45), and high correlation of the function factor with the physical component summary of the Short-From 36 (SF-36) (|rho| = 0.60).

CONCLUSION

The Taiwanese NDI is a reliable and valid disease-specific measure for assessment of pain and functional status in patients with neck pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

Clinical and radiological outcomes of cervical disc arthroplasty: ten year follow-up study

PURPOSE

Previous studies have demonstrated that cervical disc arthroplasty has favourable short- and medium-term clinical and radiological outcomes. However, long-term follow-up outcomes have rarely been reported. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the ten year follow-up clinical and radiological outcomes in patients who underwent Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients who underwent single-level Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty with a minimum ten year follow-up were included in the study. Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) score, neck disability index (NDI), and Odom's criteria were used to evaluate clinical outcomes. X-ray, CT, and MRI were used to evaluate the radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

At last follow-up, the JOA score and NDI improved significantly, and 65 patients (91.5%) had good or excellent outcomes according to Odom's criteria. The range of motion (ROM) at operated level was 9.7° pre-operatively and maintained to 8.6° at last follow-up. The sagittal alignment of operated level was decreased from 2.1° pre-operatively to 1.2° at last follow-up (P < 0.01). The ROM and sagittal alignment of cervical spine had no significant change. At last follow-up, 16 patients (22.5%) developed segmental kyphosis, and 33 patients (46.5%) developed adjacent segment degeneration. Paravertebral ossification (PO) was observed in 66 patients (93.0%), and high-grade PO (grades III and IV) was observed in 25 patients (35.2%).

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and radiological outcomes of Bryan cervical disc arthroplasty over ten years follow-up are satisfying. However, the occurrence of high-grade PO restricted the ROM of operated level.

Psychometric Validation of the Adapted Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) Version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ)

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective questionnaire translation and validation.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) into Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) and to assess its validity, reliability, and sensitivity for differentiating cervical myelopathy (CM) and presence of acute neck/shoulder pain.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CM frequently presents with various symptoms affecting patients' quality of life. Hence, a patient-oriented instrument such as JOACMEQ is necessary to assess patient-perceived outcomes of CM treatment.

METHODS

The English version of JOACMEQ was translated and adapted using double forward and single backward translations. The translated JOACMEQ was administered to patients with suspected CM, followed by the Traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI), EuroQol five-dimension five-level (EQ-5D-5L), and Short Form-12 version 2 (SF-12v2) questionnaires. Construct validity of the domains was assessed using Spearman correlation test against domains with similar constructs. Internal consistency was assessed by Cronbach's alpha. Sensitivity of the adapted JOACMEQ was determined by known group comparisons.

RESULTS

A total of 100 patients were recruited. Psychometric testing of the translated JOACMEQ demonstrated an excellent overall internal consistency with Cronbach's α > 0.9, and good internal consistency of Lower Extremity Function (0.823) and Quality of Life (0.875) domains. Score of all domains of the translated JOACMEQ had significant correlations (P < 0.01-0.05) with nearly all domains of SF-12v2 and with both NDI and EQ-5D-5L scores. JOACMEQ was sensitive in detecting differences (P < 0.001) between subjects who had CM and those without, and also between those patients with/without CM experiencing current neck/shoulder pain.

CONCLUSION

Our translated JOACMEQ has satisfactory psychometric properties, including adequate clinical and construct validity, and internal consistency in patients with suspected/diagnosed CM and can differentiate between those with/without pain. It is demonstrated as a sensitive outcome measure for CM and neck/shoulder pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

2.

Analysis of the Factors That Could Predict Segmental Range of Motion After Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement: A 7-Year Follow-up Study

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To identify the potential preoperative factors and surgical technique factors that are associated with long-term range of motion (ROM) after surgery. Further, this article aimed to guide selection of patients with cervical artificial disk replacement and a fine surgical technique.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Segmental ROM is the most important parameter concerning cervical kinematics after a cervical artificial disk replacement. There are few researches regarding the influencing factors on postoperative ROM, and consistent results have not yet been reported.

METHODS

The cohort comprised a total of 68 disks implanted into 57 patients who were retrospectively analyzed. The mean follow-up period was 84.1 months. Segmental ROM and other useful parameters were measured using lateral neutral, extension, and flexion radiographs, which were obtained preoperatively, 3 months after surgery, and at last follow-up. Preoperative CT and clinical assessment were also used. To find out associated factors, the patients were divided into 2 groups according to the segmental ROM at last follow-up.

RESULTS

After surgery, the clinical outcomes were satisfactory. The segmental ROM at last follow-up (7.8±4.3 degrees) was preserved without significant change from preoperative ROM (8.8±3.8 degrees). The patients who had a better segmental ROM after surgery were found to have a higher preoperative segmental ROM, a younger age, a better disk insertion angle, and disk insertion depth. These 4 factors were identified as independent risk factors (P=0.027, 0.017, 0.036, and 0.046, respectively) for long-term ROM.

CONCLUSIONS

The postoperative long-term, segmental ROM was well preserved and found to be affected by the preoperative segmental ROM, patient's age, disk insertion angle, and disk insertion depth.

Comparison of the Clinical and Radiographic Results Between Cervical Artificial Disk Replacement and Anterior Cervical Fusion: A 6-Year Prospective Nonrandomized Comparative Study

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective nonrandomized comparative study.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the long-term clinical and radiographic results of cervical artificial disk replacement (CADR) and anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF), and to provide our evidence if CADR could reduce adjacent segment degeneration (ASD).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

CADR is widely used in spine surgery today. Despite the short-term results of it having been ascertained, the long-term results are still under observation. Meanwhile it is still debatable if CADR could reduce ASD in the long run.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sixty-three patients with cervical myelopathy who underwent CADR (28) or ACDF (35) with a minimum follow-up of 68 months were included. Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, neck disability index, and Odom's scale were used to evaluate the clinical outcomes. Radiographs, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging were used to evaluate the radiographic outcomes.

RESULTS

Both CADR and ACDF groups showed significant improvement on Japanese Orthopaedic Association scores and neck disability index, and there was no significant difference between the 2 groups. The sagittal alignment was maintained for both the groups. The C2-C7 range of motion had no significant change for CADR group, whereas it significantly decreased for ACDF group. The range of motion at index level of CADR patients decreased from 9.5±3.7 degrees before surgery to 7.0±3.0 degrees at 3 months after surgery (P<0.001), and it was maintained to 6.6±4.1 degrees at last follow-up without significant decrease (P=0.448). We used radiographic data to evaluate ASD and we found the incidence of ASD was significantly lower for CADR group than ACDF group.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical and radiographic results of CADR over 6-year follow-up are basically satisfying. Compared with ACDF, CADR could better preserve physiological motion and biomechanics of cervical spine, and reduce the occurrence of ASD.

Urdu version of the neck disability index: a reliability and validity study

Background

Despite the wide use of the neck disability index (NDI) for assessing disability in patients with neck pain, the NDI has not yet been translated and validated in Urdu. The first purpose of the present study was to translate and cross-culturally adapt the NDI into the Urdu language (NDI-U). The second purpose was to investigate the reliability, validity and responsiveness of the NDI-U in Urdu-speaking patients experiencing chronic mechanical neck pain (CMNP).

Methods

Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the original version of the NDI were carried out using previously described procedures. Seventy-six patients with CMNP and thirty healthy participants were recruited for the study. NDI-U and visual analogue scales for pain intensity (VAS_pain) and disability (VAS_disability) were administered to all the participants at baseline and to the patients 3 weeks after receiving physiotherapy intervention. The global rating of change scale (GROC) was also administered at this time. Test-retest reliability and internal consistency were carried out on forty-six randomly selected patients two days after they completed the NDI-U. The NDI-U was evaluated for factor analysis, content validity, construct validity (discriminative and convergent validity) and responsiveness.

Results

An intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC_2,1) revealed excellent test-retest reliability for all items (ICC_2,1 = 0.86–0.98) and total scores (ICC_2,1 = 0.99) of the NDI-U. The NDI-U was found internally consistent with a Cronbach’s alpha of 0.90 and a fair to good correlation between single items and the NDI-U total scores (r = 0.34 to 0.89). Factor analysis of the NDI-U produced two factors explaining 66.71% of the variance. Content validity was good, as no floor or ceiling effects were detected for the NDI-U total score. To determine discriminative validity, an independent t-test revealed a significant difference in the NDI-U total scores between the patients and healthy controls (P < 0.001). For convergent validity, Pearson’s correlation coefficient showed a strong correlation between NDI-U and VAS_disability (r = 0.83, P < 0.001) and a moderate correlation between NDI-U and VAS_pain (r = 0.62, P < 0.001). To measure responsiveness, an independent t-test showed a significant difference in the NDI-U change scores between the stable and the improved groups (P < 0.001). Furthermore, moderate correlations were found between the NDI-U change scores and the GROC (r = 0.50, P < 0.001), VAS_disability change scores (r = 0.58, P < 0.001) and VAS_pain change scores (r = 0.55, P < 0.001).

Conclusion

The results showed that the NDI-U is a reliable, valid and responsive questionnaire to measure disability in Urdu-speaking patients with CMNP.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12891-017-1469-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Patient-reported outcome measures for non-specific neck pain validated in the Italian-language: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Patient-reported outcome measures can improve the management of patients with non-specific neck pain. The choice of measure greatly depends on its content and psychometric properties. Most questionnaires were developed for English-speaking people, and need to undergo cross-cultural validation for use in different language contexts. To help Italian clinicians select the most appropriate tool, we systematically reviewed the validated Italian-language outcome measures for non-specific neck pain, and analyzed their psychometric properties and clinical utility.

METHODS

The search was performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. All articles published in English or Italian regarding the development, translation, or validation of patient-reported outcome measures available in the Italian language were included. Two reviewers independently selected the studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality using the COSMIN checklist.

RESULTS

Out of 4891articles screened, 66 were eligible. Overall, they were of poor or fair methodological quality. Four instruments measuring function and disability (Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire, and Core Outcome Measures Index), and one measuring activity-related fear of movement (NeckPix©) were identified. Each scale showed some psychometric weaknesses or problems with functioning, and none emerged as a gold standard.

CONCLUSIONS

Several patient-reported outcome measures are now available for assessing Italian people with non-specific neck pain. While the Neck Disability Index is the one most widely used, the Neck Bournemouth Questionnaire appears the most promising tool from a psychometric point of view.

Translation, Validation, and Crosscultural Adaptation of the Hebrew Version of the Neck Disability Index

STUDY DESIGN

The present study's design was translation and crosscultural validation of the Neck Disability Index (NDI).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study was to translate and culturally adapt the NDI into Hebrew language and to evaluate the psychometric properties of this version.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

As yet, no Hebrew language neck pain and disability questionnaires exist. The NDI is widely used and validated among different patient populations with neck pain.

METHODS

The English version of the NDI was translated into Hebrew according to the published guidelines. A total of 100 patients with neck pain participated in the study. Inclusion criteria were age 18 years and older, neck pain, and ability to read and speak Hebrew. Exclusion criteria were cancer or suspected tumor, neck pain related to vertebral fracture, or neurological disease. Participants were asked to complete the NDI-Hebrew version (NDI-H), Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), and Patient-Specific Functional Scale (PSFS). Seventy-three patients completed the NDI-H twice in an interval of 2 days. Psychometric properties included test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient), internal consistency (Cronbach α), convergent validity (Pearson correlation), and factor analysis.

RESULTS

The NDI-H demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.827 to 0.929; Pv < 0.001). Cronbach α value was excellent (0.855). A very good correlation was found between the NDI-H and NPRS scores (r = 0.611, P < 0.001) and a good correlation between the NDI-H and PSFS score (r = 0.417, P < 0.001). Factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution representing daily function and pain and symptoms.

CONCLUSION

The NDI-H is a valid and reliable instrument to measure functional limitations and disability in Hebrew-speaking patients with neck pain.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

NA.

Mapping the neck disability index to SF-6D in patients with chronic neck pain

Background

This study sought to statistically map the neck disability index (NDI) to the six-dimension health state short form (SF-6D) to estimate algorithms for use in economic analyses in patients with chronic neck pain (CNP).

Methods

The relationships between NDI and SF-6D scores were estimated by using data from a cohort of patients with chronic neck pain (n = 272). By using ordinary least squares (OLS), generalized linear modeling (GLM), censored least absolute deviations (CLAD) and Tobit regression, scores from all 10 items of the NDI instruments were univariately tested against SF-6D values and retained in a multivariate regression model, if statistically significant. The predictive ability of the model was assessed by mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE) and normalized RMSE.

Results

The mean age of the 272 CNP patients was 39.9 ± 12.3 years; 57.8 % of the CNP patients were female. An OLS regression equation that included recreation item of NDI was optimal, with a MAE of 0.04and 0.04 and an RMSE of 0.06and 0.05in the derivation set and validation set, respectively. Predicted utilities accurately represented the observed ones.

Conclusions

We have provided algorithms for the estimation of health state utility values from the response of NDI. Future economic evaluations of the interventions for chronic neck pain could be informed by these algorithms.

Identification of head control deficits following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

PURPOSE

To investigate the presence of head control deficits and its course of recovery after anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) surgery in cervical spondylotic myelopathy (CSM) patients.

METHODS

Thirty-seven CSM patients were assessed for their C2-C7 cervical lordosis, neck Range of Motion (ROM), repositioning accuracy, neck strength as well as surface electromyography of the neck muscle activities during slow head motions. Assessments were performed preoperatively and then at 3- and 6-month postoperatively.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found for the C2-C7 cervical lordosis postoperatively at 6-month. ROM was restricted immediately after surgery but recovered over time, however, neck strength remained significantly reduced postoperatively. Reposition accuracy improved immediately after surgery but declined again at 6-month follow-up. In addition, muscle activities required to control head motions showed a continuous reduction postoperatively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adequate C2-C7 cervical lordosis was maintained in the current study with improvement of slow head motion control and ROM at 6-month. However, improvement in head position sense was not maintained and neck strength showed continuous declination overtime. Assessment and monitoring of head control deficits should be routinely considered in CSM patients.

Responsiveness of the Chinese versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index in postoperative patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the postoperative responsiveness of the Chinese versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ) and the Neck Disability Index (NDI) in a cohort of patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

We have recently completed the translation and cross-cultural adaptation of a Chinese version of JOACMEQ. However, the postoperative responsiveness of the Chinese JOACMEQ and how it compares with the more commonly used NDI remain undetermined.

METHODS

Forty-five patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy undergoing surgical decompression were recruited. All patients completed the Chinese JOACMEQ and the NDI preoperatively and again at 3-month follow-up together with an 11-point Global Rating of Change scale. Patients were dichotomized either as "Improved" or "Stable" on the basis of Global Rating of Change. Paired t test, standardized effect sizes, and Guyatt responsiveness index were used to determine internal responsiveness. External responsiveness was evaluated by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and the minimal clinically important change was determined as the optimal cutoff point for patient discrimination anchor-based on Global Rating of Change classification.

RESULTS

Bladder function and quality of life (QOL) domains (P < 0.03) of the JOACMEQ and the NDI (P = 0.004) reached statistically significant difference with the paired t test. After the dichotomization, the standardized effect size was strong for the QOL domain in the improved group (0.85) and the Cervical spine function (0.97) in the stable group, respectively. Based on the Guyatt responsiveness index, strong responsiveness was found for the Bladder function (0.88) and QOL (0.76) domains of the JOACMEQ and moderate responsiveness (0.55) for the NDI. The Bladder function (area = 0.82; minimal clinically important change = 6) and QOL (0.83; minimal clinically important change = 8.5) also produced largest area under the receiver operating characteristic curve.

CONCLUSION

Bladder function and QOL domains of the JOACMEQ seem to demonstrate the strongest postoperative responsiveness and thus may be more appropriate than NDI when attempting to determine treatment efficacy in cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

The Neck Disability Index-Russian Language Version (NDI-RU): A Study of Validity and Reliability

STUDY DESIGN

Cross-cultural adaptation and psychometric testing.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a validated Russian translation and then to evaluate the validity and reliability of the Russian language version of the Neck Disability Index (NDI-RU).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Neck pain is highly prevalent and can greatly affect daily activity. The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is the most frequently used scale for self-rating of disability due to neck pain. Its translated versions are applied in many countries. However, the Russian language version of the NDI has not been developed yet.

METHODS

Cross-cultural adaptation of the NDI-RU was performed according to established guidelines. Then, the NDI-RU was evaluated for content validity, concurrent criterion validity, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor structure, and minimum detectable change.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-two patients took part in the study in total: 109 in validity (39.5 ± 10 yr), 123 in reliability (38.4 ± 11 yr; 80 in the test-retest phase). A culturally valid translation was achieved. NDI-RU total scores were distributed normally. Floor/ceiling effects were absent. Good values of Cronbach α were obtained for each item (from 0.80 to 0.84) and for the total NDI-RU (0.83). A 2-factor solution was found for the NDI-RU. The average interitem correlation coefficient was 0.53. Intraclass correlation coefficients for test-retest reliability coefficients ranged from 0.65 to 0.92 for different items and 0.91 for the total NDI-RU. Moderate correlation (Spearman rs = 0.62; P < 0.05) was found between the NDI-RU total score and graphic rating scalepain score. Completion of the NDI-RU takes 3.6 ± 1 minutes.

CONCLUSION

The development of a Russian language version of the Neck Disability Index resulted in a valid, reliable instrument that can be used both in clinical practice and scientific investigations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.

Expansive Open-Door Cervical Laminoplasty: In Situ Reconstruction of Extensor Muscle Insertion on the C2 Spinous Process Combined With Titanium Miniplates Internal Fixation

Retrospective cohort study. To evaluate efficacy and relevant problems of in situ reconstruction of extensor muscle insertion on the C2 spinous process combined with titanium miniplates internal fixation in expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty in order to improve surgical treatment effect. Expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty has been widely applied in clinical practice, but there are a series of postoperative problems. Therefore, decreasing postoperative complications in order to more effectively relieve symptoms remains a subject for additional research. From October 2011 to September 2013, a total of 60 patients who suffered cervical canal stenosis were treated by expansive open-door laminoplasty with in situ reconstruction of extensor muscle insertion on the C2 spinous process combined with titanium miniplates internal fixation. Changes of cervical curvature index (CI) and range of motion (ROM) were calculated using data from preoperative and postoperative cervical spine X-ray examinations. Clinical function was scored using the Japanese Orthopedics Association Scoring System (JOA) and the neck disability index (NDI). The mean CI before the operation and at 1-year postoperation were 10.49% ± 3.93% and 14.14 ± 2.85 (P < 0.05). The mean ROM values were 43.35 ± 7.55 before the operation, 34.83 ± 7.41 at 1-year postoperation (P < 0.05). The NDI scores decreased from 19.42 ± 4.12 to 7.37 ± 2.58, and the JOA scores increased from 8.87 ± 1.99 to 13.55 ± 1.72, representing significant improvement (P < 0.05). One patient had postoperative C5 nerve root palsy and completely recovered 1 month later. Neither collapse nor door closure in the open-door side occurred in any of the patients. Expansive open-door cervical laminoplasty with in situ reconstruction of extensor muscle insertion on the C2 spinous process combined with titanium miniplates internal fixation is a safe and effective surgical method, and can effectively decrease postoperative complications and achieve satisfactory clinical results.

Validation of the simplified Chinese version of the functional rating index for patients with nonspecific neck pain in mainland China

STUDY DESIGN

Validation of a self-report questionnaire, Functional Rating Index (FRI).

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the psychometric properties of the simplified Chinese (SC) version of FRI in patients with nonspecific neck pain (NP).

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

FRI has been cross-culturally validated in few languages with excellent reliability, validity, and clinical utility when it is applied in patients with low back pain. Recently, it has been pointed out that FRI can be employed to assess patients with NP. However, FRI has not been validated in patients with NP in China.

METHODS

The cross-culturally adapted 10-item SC-FRI was completed by 122 patients with nonspecific NP, along with the Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, 36-Item Short Form Health Survey, and Pain Visual Analogue Scale. Psychometric evaluation included score distribution, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity.

RESULTS

SC-FRI attained a high completion rate (96.9%). Each item was scored with a normal distribution without any floor and ceiling effects. The internal consistency and test-retest reliability were good to excellent (Cronbach α coefficient = 0.86; intraclass r = 0.97). Construct validity was confirmed by a strong correlation with Neck Disability Index, Neck Pain and Disability Scale, and Visual Analogue Scale (r = 0.77, 0.78, and 0.86, respectively, all P < 0.0001), and with the physical functioning and bodily pain domains (r = -0.69 and -0.66, respectively, both P < 0.0001), and by a weak correlation with the vitality, role-emotional, and mental health domains of 36-Item Short Form Health Survey.

CONCLUSION

SC-FRI showed satisfactory clinical utility, internal consistency, test-retest reliability, and construct validity in Chinese-speaking patients with nonspecific NP.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3.

A systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation of the neck disability index

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a systematic review of cross-cultural adaptations of the Neck Disability Index (NDI) and to give a critical assessment to improve its translation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The NDI is used to assess functional capacity and physical activity in patients with neck pain, but the quality of its cross-cultural adaptations has not been systematically reviewed.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE were searched up through 2013 to identify studies of cross-cultural NDI adaptations. Search terms were "Neck Disability Index" or "NDI" and "cross-cultur*" or "cultur*" or "valid*" or "equivalence" or "transl*." Data were extracted and study quality was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty-four different NDI versions were identified from 14 different languages/cultures. Most reported forward and back translation and pretesting, but sample size was a problem for most studies. The Cronbach α was generally acceptable, and 13 versions met the criterion of reliability by reporting an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.70 or more, although some versions did not reach the minimal intraclass correlation coefficient. Eleven versions tested ceiling and floor effects, but only 1 Japanese version reported a floor effect. No study reported interpretability, and none provided the minimal important change or minimal important difference.

CONCLUSION

The Arabic, Italian, and Thai versions were of higher quality than the other versions according to the overall assessment of the 3 checklists. The Catalan, Chinese, Japanese, Korean, Thai, and Turkish versions need more research according to the Quality Criteria for Psychometric Properties of Health Status Questionnaire. Pretest sample size was not large enough in most cases.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1.