In vivo analysis of cervical range of motion after 4- and 5-level subaxial cervical spine fusion

Motion Capture-based 3-dimensional Measurement of Range of Motion in Patients Undergoing Cervical Laminoplasty

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective study.

OBJECTIVE

To measure 3-dimensional cervical range of motion (ROM) by noninvasive optical tracking-based motion-capture technology in patients undergoing laminoplasty, and to elucidate the postoperative effects of laminoplasty on cervical mobility.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Cervical laminoplasty is a motion-sparing decompression surgery for degenerative cervical myelopathy. Unlike cervical laminectomy and fusion, the true postoperative impact of laminoplasty on neck motion has not been well studied.

METHODS

Participants comprised 25 patients undergoing double-door cervical laminoplasty for degenerative cervical myelopathy in a single center. Maximum flexion/extension, left/right rotation, and left/right side bending were recorded using the motion-capture device preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. ROMs in 3 orthogonal axes were calculated. Preoperative differences in C2-7 Cobb angles on lateral flexion/extension x-rays were also measured as the radiologic ROM to assess reliability. Preoperative and 1-year postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association score, Neck Disability Index [NDI], and Euro-QOL were recorded, and correlations with ROMs were assessed.

RESULTS

Preoperative mean (±SD) ROMs for flexion/extension, rotation, and side bending were 90±17, 107±16, and 53±17 degrees, respectively. Although radiologic sagittal ROM measurement showed a smaller range than motion capture, averaging 36±13 degrees, a moderate to strong correlation between radiologic and motion capture values was observed (R=0.57, P=0.003). Preoperative NDI showed a negative correlation with coronal ROM (rho=-0.547, P=0.02). Postoperative ROM showed a significant reduction in rotation (95±16 degrees, P=0.002) but not in flexion/extension or side bending.

CONCLUSIONS

Three-dimensional motion-capture analysis allowed reliable measurement of cervical ROM. Rotational ROM was significantly reduced after laminoplasty, showing that cervical kinematics are still significantly altered.

Optimizing Surgical Strategy for Cervical Spinal Deformity: Global Alignment and Surgical Targets

Cervical spinal deformity (CSD) is a complex condition characterized by abnormal curvature and cervical spine alignment. It can lead to a multitude of symptoms, including chronic pain, neurological deficits, and functional impairments, severely impacting an individual's health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Surgical intervention is often necessary to address the deformity and alleviate symptoms, but optimal surgical strategies remain a topic of ongoing research and debate. This narrative review aims to provide an in-depth overview of the surgical management of CSD, focusing on optimizing patient outcomes and enhancing readers' understanding of the complexities involved. We begin by discussing the importance of preoperative assessment, including comprehensive radiographic evaluation and careful consideration of the global spinal alignment. The relationship between the cervical spine and the reciprocal changes that occur are explored to guide surgeons in their decision-making process. Furthermore, we delve into the selection of fusion levels, emphasizing the significance of identifying the primary driver of deformity. We review the current literature on optimal alignment targets and strategies to optimize surgical planning. By providing a comprehensive analysis of the surgical management of CSD, this review aims to enhance the readers' knowledge and assist surgeons in making informed decisions when planning and executing surgical interventions. Understanding the intricacies of CSD correction and the latest advancements in the field can ultimately improve patient outcomes and enhance HRQoL for individuals suffering from this challenging condition.

Effect of Cervicothoracic Junction LIV Selection on Posterior Cervical Fusion Mechanical Failure: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

Analyze and summarize literature evaluating the role of C7, T1, and T2 lowest instrumented vertebra (LIV) selection in posterior cervical fusion (PCF) and if this affects the progression of mechanical failure and revision surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Literature evaluating mechanical failure and adjacent segment disease in the setting of PCF at or nearby the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) remains limited with studies reporting conflicting results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two reviewers conducted a detailed systematic review using EMBASE, PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on June 28, 2021, for primary research articles comparing revision and complication rates for posterior fusions ending in the lower cervical spine (C7) and upper thoracic spine (T1-T2). The initial systematic database yielded 391 studies, of which 10 met all inclusion criteria. Random effects meta-analyses compared revision and mechanical failure rates between patients with an LIV above the CTJ and patients with an LIV below the CTJ.

RESULTS

Data from 10 studies (total sample=2001, LIV above CTJ=1046, and LIV below CTJ=955) were meta-analyzed. No differences were found between the 2 cohorts for all-cause revision [odds ratio (OR)=0.75, 95% CI=0.42-1.34, P<0.0001] and construct-specific revision (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.25-1.53, P<0.0001). The odds of total mechanical failure in the LIV below CTJ cohort compared with the LIV above CTJ cohort were significantly lower (OR=0.38, 95% CI=0.18-0.81, P<0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The results show patients with PCFs ending below the CTJ have a lower risk of undergoing total mechanical failure compared with fusions ending above the CTJ. This is important information for both physicians and patients to consider when planning for operative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

To Cross the Cervicothoracic Junction? Terminating Posterior Cervical Fusion Constructs Proximal to the Cervicothoracic Junction Does Not Impart Increased Risk of Reoperation in Patients With Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effect of caudal instrumentation level on revision rates following posterior cervical laminectomy and fusion.

METHODS

A retrospective review of a prospectively collected database was performed. Minimum follow-up was one year. Patients were divided into two groups based on the caudal level of their index fusion construct (Group 1-cervical and Group 2- thoracic). Reoperation rates were compared between the two groups, and preoperative demographics and radiographic parameters were compared between patients who required revision and those who did not. Multivariate binomial regression analysis was performed to determine independent risk factors for revision surgery.

RESULTS

One hundred thirty-seven (137/204) patients received fusion constructs that terminated at C7 (Group 1), while 67 (67/204) received fusion constructs that terminated at T1 or T2 (Group 2). The revision rate was 8.33% in the combined cohort, 7.3% in Group 1, and 10.4% in Group 2. There was no significant difference in revision rates between the 2 groups (P = .43). Multivariate regression analysis did not identify any independent risk factors for revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

This study shows no evidence of increased risk of revision in patients with fusion constructs terminating in the cervical spine when compared to patients with constructs crossing the cervicothoracic junction. These findings support terminating the fusion construct proximal to the cervicothoracic junction when indicated.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Functional Range of Motion of the Cervical Spine in Cervical Fusion Patients During Activities of Daily Living

Following cervical spine fusion there is a reduction in maximum range of motion (ROM) but how this impacts activity of daily living (ADLs) and quality of life is unknown. This study's purpose is to quantify maximum and functional cervical spine ROM in patients with multi-level cervical fusion (>3 levels) compared to controls during ADLs and to correlate functional range of motion with scores from patient reported outcomes measures (PROs) including the Comparative Pain Scale (CPS), Fear Avoidance Belief Questionnaire (FABQ), and Neck Disability Index (NDI). An inertial measurement unit (IMU) system quantified ROM during ADLs in the extension/flexion, lateral bending, and axial rotation directions of motion. The reliability of this system was compared to standard optical motion tracking. Fourteen participants (8 females, age = 60.0 years (18.7) (median, (interquartile range)) with a history of multi-level cervical fusion (years post-op 0.9 (0.7)) were compared to 16 controls (13 females, age = 52.1 years (15.8)). PROs were collected for each participant. Fusion participants had significantly decreased maximum ROM in all directions of motion. Fusion participants had decreased ROM for some ADLs (backing up a car, using a phone, donning socks, negotiating stairs). CPS, FABQ, and NDI scores were significantly increased in fusion participants. Reductions in two activities (backing up a car, stair negotiation) correlated with a combination of increased PRO scores. Cervical fusion decreases maximum ROM and is correlated with increased PROs in some ADLs, however there is minimal impact on functional ROM. Investigation into velocity and acceleration may yield categorization of pathologic movement.

Bridging the Cervicothoracic Junction During Multi-Level Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and Meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review seeks to compare fusion, reoperation and complication rates, estimated blood loss (EBL), and surgical time between multi-level instrumented fusions with LIVs (lowest instrumented vertebra) in the cervical spine and those that extend into the thoracic spine.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Several studies address the question of whether to extend a long-segment, posterior cervical fusions, performed for degenerative disease, into the upper thoracic spine. Recommendations for appropriate LIV continue to vary.

METHODS

A comprehensive computerized literature search through multiple electronic databases without date limits up until April 3rd, 2020 using combinations of key search terms and sets of inclusion/exclusion criteria was performed.

RESULTS

Our comprehensive literature search yielded 3852 studies. Of these, 8 articles consisting of 1162 patients were included in the meta-analysis. In 61.2% of the patients, the fusion did not cross the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) (cervical LIV, CLV). In the remaining 38.8%, the fusion extended into the upper thoracic spine (thoracic LIV, TLV). Overall, mean patient age was 62.5 years (range: 58.8-66.1 years). Our direct analysis showed that odds of fusion were not statistically different between the CLV and TLV groups (OR: .648, 95% CI: .336-1.252, P = .197). Similarly, odds of reoperation (OR: 0.726, 95% CI: 0.493-1.068, P = .104) and complication rates were similar between the 2 groups (OR: 1.214, 95% CI: 0.0.750-1.965, P = .430). Standardized mean difference (SMD) for the blood loss (SMD: .728, 95% CI: 0.554-.901, P = .000) and operative (SMD: 0.653, 95% CI: .479-.826, P = .000) differed significantly between the 2 groups. The indirect analysis showed similar fusion (Effect Size (ES)_TLV: .892, 95% CI: .840-.928 vs ES_CLV:0.894, 95% CI:0.849-.926); reoperation rate (ES_TLV:0.112, 95% CI: 0.075-.164 vs ES_CLV: .125, 95% CI: .071-.211) and complication rates (ES_TLV: .108, 95% CI: .074-.154 vs ES_CLV:0.081, 95% CI: .040-.156).

CONCLUSIONS

Our meta-analysis showed that fusion, complication, and reoperation rates did not differ significantly between patients in whom multi-level posterior fusions ended in the cervical spine vs those of which was extended into the thoracic spine. The mean blood loss, operative time and length of stay were significantly lower in patients with CLV at C6 or C7, compared to their counterparts. These data suggest that, absent focal, C7-T1 pathology, extension of long, posterior cervical fusions into the thoracic spine may not be necessary.

A novel virtual reality application for autonomous assessment of cervical range of motion: development and reliability study

Background

Neck pain, one of the most common musculoskeletal diseases, affects 222 million people worldwide. The cervical range of motion (CROM) is a tool used to assess the neck's state across three movement axes: flexo-extension, rotation, and lateral flexion. People with neck pain often have a reduced CROM, and they feel pain at the end-range and/or accompany neck movements with compensatory trunk movements. Virtual reality (VR) setups can track the movement of the head and other body parts in order to create the sensation of immersion in the virtual environment. Using this tracking position information, a CROM assessment can be performed using a VR setup that may be carried out autonomously from the user's home. The objectives of this study were to develop a VR experience that could be used to perform a CROM assessment, and to evaluate the intra-rater and inter-rater reliability of the CROM measures guided by this VR experience. To the best of our knowledge, a study of this type has not been carried out before.

Materials & Methods

A total of 30 asymptomatic adults were assessed using a VR device (HTC Vive Pro Eye™). Two raters provided support with the VR setup, and the participants were guided by the VR experience as they performed the movements. Each rater tested each subject twice, in random order. In addition to a head-mounted display (HMD), a tracker located on the subject's back was used to measure trunk compensatory movements. The CROM was estimated using only the HMD position and this measurement was corrected using the tracker data. The mean and standard deviation were calculated to characterize the CROM. To evaluate the reliability, the interclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for intra-rater and inter-rater analysis. The standard error of measurement and minimum detectable change were also calculated. The usability of the VR system was measured using the Spanish version of the System Usability Scale.

Results

The mean CROM values in each axis of movement were compatible with those described in the literature. ICC values ranged between 0.86 and 0.96 in the intra-rater analysis and between 0.83 and 0.97 in the inter-rater analysis; these values were between good and excellent. When applying the correction of the trunk movements, both the intra-rater and inter-rater ICC values slightly worsened except in the case of the lateral flexion movement, where they slightly improved. The usability score of the CROM assessment/VR system was 86 points, which is an excellent usability score.

Conclusion

The reliability of the measurements and the usability of the system indicate that a VR setup can be used to assess CROM. The reliability of the VR setup can be affected by slippage of the HMD or tracker. Both slippage errors are additive, i.e., only when the sum of these two errors is less than the compensatory movement do the measurements improve when considering the tracker data.

Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction in Multilevel Cervical Arthrodesis: A Systematic Review & Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In multisegment cervical arthrodeses, a common clinical dilemma for the surgeon is whether to extend the fusion past the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ).

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis compares clinical outcomes and radiological parameters when crossing and not crossing the CTJ.

METHODS

Our outcomes of interest included overall reoperation, successful fusion, adjacent segment disease (ASD) leading to revision surgery, estimated blood loss (EBL), length of stay (LOS). We also studied the postoperative change in radiological parameters - cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA), cervical lordosis (CL), and T1 slope (T1S) - and change in Neck Disability Index (NDI) and neck pain in Visual Analog Scale (VAS).

RESULTS

Thirteen studies with 1,720 patients were included. There were 974 (56.6%) patients in the non-crossing group and 746 (43.4%) patients in the crossing group. Non-crossing was associated with a higher risk of overall reoperation (RR=1.56; 95% CI:0.98-2.47) and ASD requiring revision surgery (RR=2.82; 95% CI:1.33-5.98; number-needed-to-harm = 22). The non-crossing group had lower EBL by 175 mL and shorter LOS by one day; the latter finding was only trending towards statistical significance. Successful fusion, as well as changes in cSVA, CL, NDI, and VAS were not different between the two groups at a statistically significant level.

CONCLUSIONS

In multilevel cervical arthrodesis, not crossing the CTJ is associated with a higher risk of overall reoperation and ASD requiring reoperation than crossing the CTJ, along with lower EBL and LOS. Differences in successful fusion, patient-reported outcomes, and sagittal radiological parameters were not significant.

No Difference in Reoperation Rates for Adjacent Segment Disease (Operative Adjacent Segment Disease) in Posterior Cervical Fusions Stopping at C7 Versus T1/T2: A Cohort of 875 Patients-Part 1

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study with chart review.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether there is a difference in reoperation rates for adjacent segment disease ([ASD] operative ASD) in posterior cervical fusions (PCFs) that stop at -C7 versus -T1/T2.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

There are surgical treatment challenges to the anatomical complexities of the cervicothoracic junction. Current posterior cervical spine surgery is based on the belief that ASD occurs if fusions are stopped at C7 although there is varying evidence to support this assumption.

METHODS

Patients were followed until validated reoperations for ASD, membership termination, death, or March 31, 2020. Descriptive statistics and 5-year crude incidence rates and 95% confidence intervals for operative ASD for PCF ending at -C7 or -T1/T2 were reported. Time-dependent crude and adjusted multivariable Cox-Proportional Hazards models were used to evaluate operative ASD rates with adjustment for covariates or risk change estimates more than 10%.

RESULTS

We identified 875 patients with PCFs (beginning at C3 or C4 or C5 or C6) stopping at either -C7 (n = 470) or -T1/T2 (n = 405) with average follow-up time of 4.6 (±3.3) years and average time to operative ASD of 2.7 (±2.8) years. Crude overall incidence rates for stopping at -C7 (2.12% [1.02%-3.86%]) and -T1/T2 (2.48% [1.25%-4.40%]) were comparable with no statistical difference in risk (adjusted hazard ratio = 1.47, 95% confidence interval = 0.61-3.53, P = 0.39). In addition, we observed no differences in the probability of operative ASD in competing risk time-dependent models (Grey test P  = 0.448).

CONCLUSION

A large cohort of 875 patients with PCFs stopping at -C7 or -T1/T2 with an average follow-up of more than 4 years found no statistical difference in reoperation rates for ASD (operative ASD).Level of Evidence: 3.

Factors predicting loss of cervical lordosis following cervical laminoplasty: A critical review

Background:

Laminoplasty is a method of posterior cervical decompression which indirectly decompresses the spinal column. Unfortunately, many patients undergoing laminoplasty develops postoperative loss of cervical lordosis (LCL) or kyphotic alignment of cervical spine even though they have sufficient preoperative lordosis which results in poor surgical outcome.

Objective:

We would like to highlight the relationship between various radiological parameters of cervical alignment and postoperative LCL in patients undergoing laminoplasty.

Methods:

We performed extensive literature search using PubMed, Google Scholar, and Web of Science for relevant articles that report factors affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.

Results:

On reviewing the literature, patients with high T1 slope have more lordotic alignment of cervical spine preoperatively. They also have more chances of LCL following laminoplasty. C2–C7 sagittal vertical axis (SVA) has no role in predicting LCL following laminoplasty though patients with low T1 slope (≤20°) and high C2–C7 SVA (>22 mm) had correction of kyphotic deformity following laminoplasty. C2–C7 lordosis, Neck Tilt, cervical range of motion, and thoracic kyphosis has no predictive value for LCL. Lower value of T1 slope (T1S-CL) and CL/T1S has more incidence of developing LCL following laminoplasty. The role of C2–C3 disc angle has not yet been evaluated in patients undergoing laminoplasty. Dynamic extension reserve determines the contraction reserve of SPMLC and lower dynamic extension reserve is associated with higher chances of LCL following laminoplasty.

Conclusions:

Cervical lordotic alignment is important in maintaining cervical sagittal balance which ultimately is responsible for global spinal sagittal balance and horizontal gaze. Among various radiological parameters, T1 Slope has been reported to be the most important factor affecting cervical alignment following laminoplasty.

Crossing the Cervicothoracic Junction in Cervical Arthrodesis Results in Lower Rates of Adjacent Segment Disease Without Affecting Operative Risks or Patient-Reported Outcomes

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the risks and benefits of crossing the cervicothoracic junction (CTJ) in cervical arthrodesis.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Whether the CTJ should be crossed in cervical arthrodesis remains up for debate. Keeping C7 as the distal end of the fusion risks adjacent segment disease (ASD) and can result in myelopathy or radiculopathy. Longer fusions are thought to increase operative risk and complexity but result in lower rates of ASD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients undergoing cervical spine fusion surgery ending at C7 or T1 with ≥1-year follow-up were included. To evaluate operative risk, estimated blood loss (EBL), operative time, and length of hospital stay were collected. To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs), Neck Disability Index (NDI) and SF-12 questionnaires (PCS12 and MCS12) were obtained at follow-up. Revision surgery data were also obtained.

RESULTS

A total of 168 patients were included and divided into a C7 end-of-fusion cohort (NC7=59) and a T1 end-of-fusion cohort (NT1=109). Multivariate regression analysis adjusting for age, sex, race, surgical approach, and number of levels fused showed that EBL (P=0.12), operative time (P=0.07), and length of hospital stay (P=0.06) are not significantly different in the C7 and T1 end-of-fusion cohorts. Multivariate regression of PROs showed no significant difference in NDI (P=0.70), PCS12 (P=0.23), or MCS12 (P=0.15) between cohorts. Fisher analysis showed significantly higher revision rates in the C7 end-of-fusion cohort (7/59 for C7 vs. 2/109 for T1; odds ratio, 6.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-65.1; P=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Crossing the CTJ in cervical arthrodesis does not increase operative risk as measured by blood loss, operative time, and length of hospital stay. However, it leads to lower revision rates, likely because of the avoidance of ASD, and comparable PROs. Thus, crossing the CTJ may help prevent ASD without negatively affecting operative risk or long-term PROs.

Experimental assessment of cervical ranges of motion and compensatory strategies

Background

Literature is still limited regarding reports of non-invasive assessment of the cervical range of motion in normal subjects. Investigations into compensatory motions, defined as the contribution of an additional direction to the required motion, are also limited.

The objectives of this work were to develop and assess a reliable method for measuring the cervical range of motion in order to investigate motion and compensatory strategies.

Methods and data collection

Ninety-seven no neck-related pain subjects (no severe cervical pathology, 57 women, age: 28.3 ± 7.5y. old, BMI: 22.5 ± 3.2 kg/m²) underwent a non-invasive cervical range of motion assessment protocol. In-vivo head’s motion relative to the thorax was assessed through the measurement of the main angular amplitudes in the 3 directions (flexion/extension, axial rotations and lateral inclinations) and associated compensatory motions using an opto-electronic acquisition system.

Results

The principal motion reproducibility resulted in intra-class correlation coefficients ranging from 0.81 to 0.86. The following maximum ranges of motion were found: 127.4 ± 15.1° of flexion/extension, 89.3 ± 12° of lateral inclinations and 146.4 ± 13° of axial rotations after 6 outlier exclusions. Compensatory motions highly depend on the associated principal motion: for flexion/extension: (3.5 ± 7.6;-2.1 ± 7.8°), for rotation: (25.7 ± 17.9°;0.4 ± 4.7)°, for inclination: (22.9 ± 34.7°;-0.04 ± 8.7°). Age, BMI and weight significantly correlated with flexions (p < 0.032). Motion patterns were identified through clustering.

Conclusions

This kinematic analysis has been proven to be a reliable diagnostic tool for the cervical range of motion. The non-unicity and variability of motion patterns through the clustering of motion strategy identification have been shown. Compensatory motions contributed to such motion pattern definition despite presenting significant intra-individual variability.