Advanced breast cancer: chemotherapy phase III trials that change a standard

Costs and mortality of recurrent versus de novo hormone receptor-positive/HER2(-) metastatic breast cancer

AIM

To examine cost and mortality differences in postmenopausal women with HR(+)/HER2(-) advanced breast cancer.

METHODS

Using claims data (2007-2013), women with newly diagnosed (de novo) stage IV, or early- or late-recurring metastatic breast cancer were identified.

RESULTS

Compared with de novo (n = 121) and late-recurrent (n = 106), early-recurrent (n = 172) patients had significantly higher costs in total and for anticancer systemic agents. Adjusted per patient per month costs for early-recurrent patients were US$13,404, versus US$9955 (de novo) and US$9721 (late-recurrent; p = 0.02). Early-recurrent patients' risk of death was twice that of de novo patients (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

Compared with new diagnosis or late recurrence, early recurrence of HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer was associated with higher mortality and healthcare costs.

Sequential Metastatic Breast Cancer Chemotherapy: Should the Median be the Message?

Background: Counseling and anticipatory guidance of the expected course of treatment for women newly diagnosed with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) are difficult due to multiple factors influencing survival following MBC therapy. In order to better tailor counseling at the onset and through the duration of MBC we used non-clinical trial data to better characterize real life experience of sequential MBC treatment. We examined the following aims: (1) What demographic and tumor characteristics are predictive of survival in MBC? (2) What is the median duration of each sequential chemotherapy regimen and subsequent survival of women following each sequence of chemotherapy regimen in MBC?

Methods: Retrospective study included 792 women diagnosed from January 1999 through December 2009 at the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Program.

Results: Median duration of sequential chemotherapy regimen and median survival from completion of sequence of chemotherapy regimens were relatively short with a wide range of treatment duration and survival. Characteristics for poor survival included hormone status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER 2/neu) status, and increased number and type of metastatic sites. Women who took more than the second sequential chemotherapy regimens had no more than median 3 months of treatment duration and 6 months survival from treatment termination.

Discussion: Median clinical response and survival shorten with sequential chemotherapy regimen but with wide ranges. The rare clinical response of the minority should not set the standard for treatment expectations. All cancer clinicians, including oncology nurses, must ensure that patients are receiving tailored counseling regarding their specific risks and benefits for sequential MBC chemotherapy.

Tumor-Specific Systemic Treatment in Advanced Breast Cancer - How Long does it Make Sense?

SUMMARY: Metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is a chronic and incurable disease which can be kept steady for a long time with continuous oncologic therapy. There are various treatment options. Disease-free as well as overall survival were prolonged in many pharmaceutical studies. The therapist focuses on these oncologic parameters as well as the patient's quality of life. One central point of the communication between doctor and patient is the prediction by the medical team of how long to continue oncologic therapy and when to start palliative medicine in terms of best palliative care. Treatment options currently available for MBC as well as the importance of this difficult communication between the involved parties are pointed out. The end of tumor-specific oncologic therapy does not necessarily mean the end of therapeutic measures for the individual patient.

Role of gemcitabine in metastatic breast cancer patients: a short review

Many active cytotoxic drugs, given according to a number of different regimens are approved for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer patients. However, these therapies have not changed the outcome of patients affected by this malignancy. As a consequence, the balance between chemotherapy-induced side effects and relief of cancer-related symptoms must be carefully considered in this setting. Gemcitabine is an antimetabolite that is incorporated as a triphosphate into DNA. As a single agent, it yields responses rates ranging from 14% to 37% in chemotherapy-naïve patients and from 12% to 30% in patients previously treated with anthracyclines and/or taxanes. In combination with paclitaxel, it produces a significantly higher response rate (41.4% vs. 26.2%), longer time to progression (6.1 vs. 4 months) and significantly higher overall survival (18.6 vs. 15.8 months) than paclitaxel alone. In addition, a phase III study revealed that gemcitabine plus docetaxel is as effective as capecitabine plus docetaxel, but causes significantly less non-haematologic toxicity. Lastly, in another phase III trial, progression free survival was significantly longer with the combination of gemcitabine plus vinorelbine than with vinorelbine alone (6 vs. 4 months), but without a significant difference in overall survival; the incidence of haematologic toxicity was higher in the group treated with combined therapy. Novel gemcitabine combinations are being investigated in phase II studies.