1
|
Randhawa VK, Lee R, Alviar CL, Rali AS, Arias A, Vaidya A, Zern EK, Fagan A, Proudfoot AG, Katz JN. Extra-cardiac management of cardiogenic shock in the intensive care unit. J Heart Lung Transplant 2024; 43:1051-1058. [PMID: 38823968 DOI: 10.1016/j.healun.2024.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/25/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a heterogeneous clinical syndrome characterized by low cardiac output leading to end-organ hypoperfusion. Organ dysoxia ranging from transient organ injury to irreversible organ failure and death occurs across all CS etiologies but differing by incidence and type. Herein, we review the recognition and management of respiratory, renal and hepatic failure complicating CS. We also discuss unmet needs in the CS care pathway and future research priorities for generating evidence-based best practices for the management of extra-cardiac sequelae. The complexity of CS admitted to the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit demands a workforce skilled to care for these extra-cardiac critical illness complications with an appreciation for how cardio-systemic interactions influence critical illness outcomes in afflicted patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Varinder K Randhawa
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Division of Cardiology, St Michael's Hospital, and Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Ran Lee
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Sections of Critical Care Cardiology and Advanced Heart Failure and Transplant Cardiology, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - Carlos L Alviar
- The Leon H Charney Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, New York
| | - Aniket S Rali
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, and Department of Anesthesiology, Division of Critical Care Medicine, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee
| | - Alexandra Arias
- Instituto Nacional de Cardiologia Ignacio Chavez, Mexico City, Mexico
| | - Anjali Vaidya
- Pulmonary Hypertension, Right Heart Failure, and CTEPH Program, Division of Cardiology, Temple University Lewis Katz School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Emily K Zern
- Department of Cardiology, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles General Medicine Center, Los Angeles General Medical Center, Keck School of Medicine of University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Andrew Fagan
- Department of Surgery, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Alastair G Proudfoot
- Department of Perioperative Medicine, Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine and Bellevue Hospital Center, New York, New York.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rali AS, Tran L, Balakrishna A, Senussi M, Kapur NK, Metkus T, Tedford RJ, Lindenfeld J. Guide to Lung-Protective Ventilation in Cardiac Patients. J Card Fail 2024; 30:829-837. [PMID: 38513887 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2024.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2023] [Revised: 01/12/2024] [Accepted: 01/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/23/2024]
Abstract
The incidence of acute respiratory insufficiency has continued to increase among patients admitted to modern-day cardiovascular intensive care units. Positive pressure ventilation (PPV) remains the mainstay of treatment for these patients. Alterations in intrathoracic pressure during PPV has distinct effects on both the right and left ventricles, affecting cardiovascular performance. Lung-protective ventilation (LPV) minimizes the risk of further lung injury through ventilator-induced lung injury and, hence, an understanding of LPV and its cardiopulmonary interactions is beneficial for cardiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aniket S Rali
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN.
| | - Lena Tran
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Aditi Balakrishna
- Department of Anesthesiology, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| | - Mourad Senussi
- Department of Medicine, Baylor St. Luke's Medical Center, Houston, TX
| | - Navin K Kapur
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Thomas Metkus
- Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ryan J Tedford
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC
| | - Joann Lindenfeld
- Division of Cardiovascular Diseases, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Thomas A, Banna S, Shahu A, Ali T, Schenck C, Patel B, Notarianni A, Phommalinh M, Kochar A, Heck C, van Diepen S, Miller PE. Propofol vs etomidate for induction prior to invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute myocardial infarction. Am Heart J 2024; 272:116-125. [PMID: 38554762 DOI: 10.1016/j.ahj.2024.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/11/2024] [Revised: 03/19/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) requiring invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) have a high mortality. However, little is known regarding the impact of induction agents, used prior to IMV, on clinical outcomes in this population. We assessed for the association between induction agent and mortality in patients with AMI requiring IMV. METHODS We compared clinical outcomes between those receiving propofol compared to etomidate for induction among adults with AMI between October 2015 and December 2019 using the Vizient® Clinical Data Base, a multicenter, US national database. We used inverse probability treatment weighting (IPTW) to assess for the association between induction agent and in-hospital mortality. RESULTS We identified 5,147 patients, 1,386 (26.9%) of received propofol and 3,761 (73.1%) received etomidate for IMV induction. The mean (SD) age was 66.1 (12.4) years, 33.0% were women, and 51.6% and 39.8% presented with STEMI and cardiogenic shock, respectively. Patients in the propofol group were more likely to require preintubation vasoactive medication and mechanical circulatory support (both, P < .05). Utilization of propofol was associated with lower mortality compared to etomidate (32.3% vs 36.1%, P = .01). After propensity weighting, propofol use remained associated with lower mortality (weighted mean difference -4.7%; 95% confidence interval: -7.6% to -1.8%, P = .002). Total cost, ventilator days, and length of stay were higher in the propofol group (all, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS Induction with propofol, compared with etomidate, was associated with lower mortality for patients with AMI requiring IMV. Randomized trials are needed to determine the optimal induction agent for this critically ill patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Thomas
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Soumya Banna
- Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Andi Shahu
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Tariq Ali
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Bhoumesh Patel
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cardiothoracic Division, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Andrew Notarianni
- Department of Anesthesiology, Cardiothoracic Division, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | | | - Ajar Kochar
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Cory Heck
- Heart and Vascular Center, Yale New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Lopez MP, Applefeld W, Miller PE, Elliott A, Bennett C, Lee B, Barnett C, Solomon MA, Corradi F, Sionis A, Mireles-Cabodevila E, Tavazzi G, Alviar CL. Complex Heart-Lung Ventilator Emergencies in the CICU. Cardiol Clin 2024; 42:253-271. [PMID: 38631793 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccl.2024.02.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
This review aims to enhance the comprehension and management of cardiopulmonary interactions in critically ill patients with cardiovascular disease undergoing mechanical ventilation. Highlighting the significance of maintaining a delicate balance, this article emphasizes the crucial role of adjusting ventilation parameters based on both invasive and noninvasive monitoring. It provides recommendations for the induction and liberation from mechanical ventilation. Special attention is given to the identification of auto-PEEP (positive end-expiratory pressure) and other situations that may impact hemodynamics and patients' outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mireia Padilla Lopez
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute IIB Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Willard Applefeld
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC, USA
| | - P. Elliott Miller
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Andrea Elliott
- Division of Cardiology, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Courtney Bennett
- Heart and Vascular Institute, Leigh Valley Health Network, Allentown, PA, USA
| | - Burton Lee
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, MA, USA
| | - Christopher Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Michael A Solomon
- Clinical Center and Cardiology Branch, Critical Care Medicine Department, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MA, USA
| | - Francesco Corradi
- Department of Surgical, Medical, Molecular Pathology and Critical Care Medicine, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sionis
- Department of Cardiology, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Biomedical Research Institute IIB Sant Pau, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Eduardo Mireles-Cabodevila
- Respiratory Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Ohio and the Lerner College of Medicine of Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Critical Care Medicine, Intensive Care Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | - Carlos L Alviar
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schenck CS, Chouairi F, Dudzinski DM, Miller PE. Noninvasive Ventilation in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med 2024:8850666241243261. [PMID: 38571399 DOI: 10.1177/08850666241243261] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2024]
Abstract
Over the last several decades, the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has seen an increase in the complexity of the patient population and etiologies requiring CICU admission. Currently, respiratory failure is the most common reason for admission to the contemporary CICU. As a result, noninvasive ventilation (NIV), including noninvasive positive-pressure ventilation and high-flow nasal cannula, has been increasingly utilized in the management of patients admitted to the CICU. In this review, we detail the different NIV modalities and summarize the evidence supporting their use in conditions frequently encountered in the CICU. We describe the unique pathophysiologic interactions between positive pressure ventilation and left and/or right ventricular dysfunction. Additionally, we discuss the evidence and strategies for utilization of NIV as a method to reduce extubation failure in patients who required invasive mechanical ventilation. Lastly, we examine unique considerations for managing respiratory failure in certain, high-risk patient populations such as those with right ventricular failure, severe valvular disease, and adult congenital heart disease. Overall, it is critical for clinicians who practice in the CICU to be experts with the application, risks, benefits, and modalities of NIV in cardiac patients with respiratory failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fouad Chouairi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, USA
| | - David M Dudzinski
- Department of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
- Corrigan Minehan Heart Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kaur G, Berg DD. The Changing Epidemiology of the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. Crit Care Clin 2024; 40:1-13. [PMID: 37973347 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccc.2023.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2023]
Abstract
Coronary care units (CCUs) were originally designed to monitor and treat peri-infarction ventricular arrhythmias but have evolved into highly specialized cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) that provide care to a patient population that is increasingly heterogeneous and complex. Paralleling broader epidemiologic trends, patients admitted to contemporary CICUs are older and have a greater burden of cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular comorbidities. Moreover, contemporary CICU patients have high illness severity and often present with acute noncardiac organ dysfunction. In addition to these shifting demographic patterns, there have been important epidemiologic changes in CICU technologies, multidisciplinary systems of care, and physician staffing and training.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gurleen Kaur
- Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - David D Berg
- Department of Medicine, Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, TIMI Study Group, 60 Fenwood Road, Suite 7022, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Miller PE, Huber K, Bohula EA, Krychtiuk KA, Pöss J, Roswell RO, Tavazzi G, Solomon MA, Kristensen SD, Morrow DA. Research Priorities in Critical Care Cardiology: JACC Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 82:2329-2337. [PMID: 38057075 PMCID: PMC10752230 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.09.828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Revised: 08/15/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 12/08/2023]
Abstract
Over the last several decades, the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has seen a substantial evolution in the patient population, comorbidities, and diagnoses. However, the generation of high-quality evidence to manage these complex and critically ill patients has been slow. Given the scarcity of clinical trials focused on critical care cardiology (CCC), CICU clinicians are often left to extrapolate from studies that either exclude or poorly represent the patient population admitted to CICUs. The lack of high-quality evidence and limited guidance from society guidelines has led to significant variation in practice patterns for many of the most common CICU diagnoses. Several barriers, both common to critical care research and unique to CCC, have impeded progress. In this multinational perspective, we describe key areas of priority for CCC research, current challenges for investigation in the CICU, and essential elements of a path forward for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
| | - Kurt Huber
- 3rd Department of Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Wilhelminen Hospital, and Sigmund Freud University, Medical Faculty, Vienna, Austria
| | - Erin A Bohula
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Konstantin A Krychtiuk
- Department of Internal Medicine II, Division of Cardiology Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Janine Pöss
- Department of Cardiology, Heart Center Leipzig at University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Robert O Roswell
- Northwell Health, Zucker School of Medicine, Hempstead, New York, USA
| | - Guido Tavazzi
- Department of Clinical-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, Intensive Care Fondazione Policlinico San Matteo Hospital IRCCS, Pavia, Italy
| | - Michael A Solomon
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | | | - David A Morrow
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lamba HK, Hart LD, Zhang Q, Loera JM, Civitello AB, Nair AP, Senussi MH, Loor G, Liao KK, Shafii AE, Chatterjee S. Clinical Predictors and Outcomes After Left Ventricular Assist Device Implantation and Tracheostomy. Tex Heart Inst J 2023; 50:e238100. [PMID: 37624675 PMCID: PMC10660898 DOI: 10.14503/thij-23-8100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/27/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Postoperative respiratory failure is a major complication that affects up to 10% of patients who undergo cardiac surgery and has a high in-hospital mortality rate. Few studies have investigated whether patients who require tracheostomy for postoperative respiratory failure after continuous-flow left ventricular assist device (CF-LVAD) implantation have worse survival outcomes than patients who do not. OBJECTIVE To identify risk factors for respiratory failure necessitating tracheostomy in CF-LVAD recipients and to compare survival outcomes between those who did and did not require tracheostomy. METHODS Consecutive patients who underwent primary CF-LVAD placement at a single institution between August 1, 2002, and December 31, 2019, were retrospectively reviewed. Propensity score matching accounted for baseline differences between the tracheostomy and nontracheostomy groups. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify tracheostomy risk factors and 90-day survival; Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to assess midterm survival. RESULTS During the study period, 664 patients received a CF-LVAD; 106 (16.0%) underwent tracheostomy for respiratory failure. Propensity score matching produced 103 matched tracheostomy-nontracheostomy pairs. Patients who underwent tracheostomy were older (mean [SD] age, 57.9 [12.3] vs 54.6 [13.9] years; P = .02) and more likely to need preoperative mechanical circulatory support (61.3% vs 47.8%; P = .01) and preoperative intubation (27.4% vs 8.8%; P < .001); serum creatinine was higher in the tracheostomy group (mean [SD], 1.7 [1.0] vs 1.4 [0.6] mg/dL; P < .001), correlating with tracheostomy need (odds ratio, 1.76; 95% CI, 1.21-2.56; P = .003). Both before and after propensity matching, 30-day, 60-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival were worse in patients who underwent tracheostomy. Median follow-up was 0.8 years (range, 0.0-11.2 years). Three-year Kaplan-Meier survival was significantly worse for the tracheostomy group before (22.0% vs 61.0%; P < .001) and after (22.4% vs 48.3%; P < .001) matching. CONCLUSION Given the substantially increased probability of death in patients who develop respiratory failure and need tracheostomy, those at high risk for respiratory failure should be carefully considered for CF-LVAD implantation. Comprehensive management to decrease respiratory failure before and after surgery is critical.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harveen K. Lamba
- Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Lucy D. Hart
- Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Qianzi Zhang
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Jackquelin M. Loera
- Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Andrew B. Civitello
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Ajith P. Nair
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Mourad H. Senussi
- Section of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Gabriel Loor
- Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Kenneth K. Liao
- Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Alexis E. Shafii
- Division of Cardiothoracic Transplantation and Circulatory Support, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
| | - Subhasis Chatterjee
- Division of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
- Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, The Texas Heart Institute, Houston, Texas
- Division of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery, Michael E. DeBakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Bansal M, Mehta A, Machanahalli Balakrishna A, Kalyan Sundaram A, Kanwar A, Singh M, Vallabhajosyula S. RIGHT VENTRICULAR DYSFUNCTION IN SEPSIS: AN UPDATED NARRATIVE REVIEW. Shock 2023; 59:829-837. [PMID: 36943772 DOI: 10.1097/shk.0000000000002120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/23/2023]
Abstract
ABSTRACT Sepsis is a multisystem disease process, which constitutes a significant public health challenge and is associated with high morbidity and mortality. Among other systems, sepsis is known to affect the cardiovascular system, which may manifest as myocardial injury, arrhythmias, refractory shock, and/or septic cardiomyopathy. Septic cardiomyopathy is defined as the reversible systolic and/or diastolic dysfunction of one or both ventricles. Left ventricle dysfunction has been extensively studied in the past, and its prognostic role in patients with sepsis is well documented. However, there is relatively scarce literature on right ventricle (RV) dysfunction and its role. Given the importance of timely detection of septic cardiomyopathy and its bearing on prognosis of patients, the role of RV dysfunction has come into renewed focus. Hence, through this review, we sought to describe the pathophysiology of RV dysfunction in sepsis and what have we learnt so far about its multifactorial nature. We also elucidate the roles of different biomarkers for its detection and prognosis, along with appropriate management of such patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mridul Bansal
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | - Aryan Mehta
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Wake Forest University School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, North Carolina
| | | | - Arvind Kalyan Sundaram
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, UMass Chan-Baystate Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | | | - Mandeep Singh
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Schenck C, Banna S, Heck C, Ali T, Miller PE. Rocuronium Versus Succinylcholine in Patients With Acute Myocardial Infarction Requiring Mechanical Ventilation. J Am Heart Assoc 2023; 12:e8468. [PMID: 37158165 PMCID: PMC10227322 DOI: 10.1161/jaha.123.029775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Soumya Banna
- Department of Internal MedicineYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Cory Heck
- Yale New Haven HospitalNew HavenCTUSA
| | - Tariq Ali
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| | - P. Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal MedicineYale School of MedicineNew HavenCTUSA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Carnicelli AP, Agarwal R, Tedford RJ, Ramaiah V, Felker GM, Katz JN. Critical Care Enrichment During Advanced Heart Failure Training. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023; 81:1296-1299. [PMID: 36990549 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.01.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2022] [Revised: 01/25/2023] [Accepted: 01/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/31/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony P Carnicelli
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA.
| | - Richa Agarwal
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ryan J Tedford
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, South Carolina, USA
| | - Vijay Ramaiah
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - G Michael Felker
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Management of Cardiogenic Shock Unrelated to Acute Myocardial Infarction. Can J Cardiol 2023; 39:406-419. [PMID: 36731605 DOI: 10.1016/j.cjca.2023.01.023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Revised: 01/18/2023] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Cardiogenic shock is an extreme manifestation of acute decompensated heart failure. Cardiogenic shock is often caused by-and has traditionally been studied in the setting of-acute myocardial infarction (AMI CS); however, there is increasing incidence and recognition of cardiogenic shock not associated with acute myocardial infarction (non-AMI CS) as a distinct entity. Despite decades of study and technologic advancements, cardiogenic shock mortality remains as high as 50%, regardless of etiology. New approaches to shock phenotyping and classification have emerged, with a focus on appropriately matching patient physiology to a growing list of available interventions. Further study is needed to determine whether these efforts will lead to more nuanced use of mechanical circulatory support and improved patient outcomes, especially in non-AMI CS. In the meantime, models of care incorporating multidisciplinary decision making, such as shock teams, may improve patient selection and outcomes.
Collapse
|
13
|
Shahu A, Banna S, Applefeld W, Rampersad P, Alviar CL, Ali T, Luk A, Fajardo E, van Diepen S, Miller PE. Liberation From Mechanical Ventilation in the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. JACC. ADVANCES 2023; 2:100173. [PMID: 38939038 PMCID: PMC11198553 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100173] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2022] [Revised: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
The prevalence of respiratory failure is increasing in the contemporary cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) and is associated with a significant increase in morbidity and mortality. For patients that survive their initial respiratory decompensation, liberation from invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and the decision to extubate requires careful clinical assessment and planning. Therefore, it is essential for the CICU clinician to know how to assess and manage the various stages of IMV liberation, including ventilator weaning, evaluation of extubation readiness, and provide post-extubation care. In this review, we provide a comprehensive approach to liberation from IMV in the CICU, including cardiopulmonary interactions relative to withdrawal from positive pressure ventilation, evaluation of readiness for and assessment of spontaneous breathing trials, sedation management to optimize extubation, strategies for patients at a high risk for extubation failure, and tracheostomy in the cardiovascular patient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andi Shahu
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Soumya Banna
- Department of Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Willard Applefeld
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Penelope Rampersad
- The Tomsich Family Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Connecticut, USA
| | - Carlos L. Alviar
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University Langone Medicine Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tariq Ali
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Mayo, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Adriana Luk
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Elaine Fajardo
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - P. Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Metkus TS, Baird-Zars VM, Alfonso CE, Alviar CL, Barnett CF, Barsness GW, Berg DD, Bertic M, Bohula EA, Burke J, Burstein B, Chaudhry SP, Cooper HA, Daniels LB, Fordyce CB, Ghafghazi S, Goldfarb M, Katz JN, Keeley EC, Keller NM, Kenigsberg B, Kontos MC, Kwon Y, Lawler PR, Leibner E, Liu S, Menon V, Miller PE, Newby LK, O'Brien CG, Papolos AI, Pierce MJ, Prasad R, Pisani B, Potter BJ, Roswell RO, Sinha SS, Shah KS, Smith TD, Snell RJ, So D, Solomon MA, Ternus BW, Teuteberg JJ, van Diepen S, Zakaria S, Morrow DA. Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN): a cohort profile. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. QUALITY OF CARE & CLINICAL OUTCOMES 2022; 8:703-708. [PMID: 36029517 PMCID: PMC9603535 DOI: 10.1093/ehjqcco/qcac055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/11/2022] [Revised: 08/23/2022] [Accepted: 08/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The aims of the Critical Care Cardiology Trials Network (CCCTN) are to develop a registry to investigate the epidemiology of cardiac critical illness and to establish a multicentre research network to conduct randomised clinical trials (RCTs) in patients with cardiac critical illness. METHODS AND RESULTS The CCCTN was founded in 2017 with 16 centres and has grown to a research network of over 40 academic and clinical centres in the United States and Canada. Each centre enters data for consecutive cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) admissions for at least 2 months of each calendar year. More than 20 000 unique CICU admissions are now included in the CCCTN Registry. To date, scientific observations from the CCCTN Registry include description of variations in care, the epidemiology and outcomes of all CICU patients, as well as subsets of patients with specific disease states, such as shock, heart failure, renal dysfunction, and respiratory failure. The CCCTN has also characterised utilization patterns, including use of mechanical circulatory support in response to changes in the heart transplantation allocation system, and the use and impact of multidisciplinary shock teams. Over years of multicentre collaboration, the CCCTN has established a robust research network to facilitate multicentre registry-based randomised trials in patients with cardiac critical illness. CONCLUSION The CCCTN is a large, prospective registry dedicated to describing processes-of-care and expanding clinical knowledge in cardiac critical illness. The CCCTN will serve as an investigational platform from which to conduct randomised controlled trials in this important patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S Metkus
- Divisions of Cardiology and Cardiac Surgery, Departments of Medicine and Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Vivian M Baird-Zars
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Carlos E Alfonso
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine; University of Miami Hospital & Clinics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Carlos L Alviar
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York 10016 NY, USA
| | - Christopher F Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Gregory W Barsness
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN 55902, USA
| | - David D Berg
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mia Bertic
- University of Toronto Etobicoke,Toronto ON, Canada
| | - Erin A Bohula
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - James Burke
- Lehigh Valley Heart Institute, Allentown, PA 18103, USA
| | | | | | - Howard A Cooper
- Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College, Valhalla NY 10901, USA
| | - Lori B Daniels
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine La Jolla, UCSD, San Diego, CA 92037, USA
| | - Christopher B Fordyce
- UBC Centre for Cardiovascular Innovation, Cardiovascular Health Program, UBC Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcomes Sciences, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Shahab Ghafghazi
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY 40202, USA
| | - Michael Goldfarb
- Division of Cardiology, Jewish General Hospital, McGill University, Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Ellen C Keeley
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA
| | - Norma M Keller
- Department of Medicine at NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Bellevue Hospital, New York NY 10016, USA
| | - Benjamin Kenigsberg
- Departments of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC, WA 20010, USA
| | - Michael C Kontos
- Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA 23219, USA
| | - Younghoon Kwon
- Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA
| | - Patrick R Lawler
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, Toronto General Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto ON, Canada
| | - Evan Leibner
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, The Mount Sinai Hospital, New York, NY 10029, USA
| | - Shuangbo Liu
- Max Rady College of Medicine St. Boniface Hospital Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Venu Menon
- Cardiovascular Medicine, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06510, USA
| | - L Kristin Newby
- Divison of Cardiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC 27710, USA
| | - Connor G O'Brien
- Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of California-San Francisco School of Medicine, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Alexander I Papolos
- Departments of Cardiology and Critical Care Medicine, MedStar Washington Hospital Center, Washington DC, WA 20010, USA
| | - Matthew J Pierce
- Department of Cardiology, Zucker School of Medicine at Hofstra/Northwell, Long Island, NY 11549, USA
| | - Rajnish Prasad
- Wellstar Cardiovascular Medicine, Marietta, GA 30060, USA
| | | | - Brian J Potter
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | | | - Shashank S Sinha
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, VA 22042, USA
| | - Kevin S Shah
- University of Utah Health Sciences Center, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
| | - Timothy D Smith
- The Christ Hospital and Lindner Institute for Research and Education Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA
| | | | - Derek So
- University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | | | - Bradley W Ternus
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Jeffrey J Teuteberg
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University Medical Center, Palo Alto, CA 94305, USA
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Sammy Zakaria
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - David A Morrow
- Levine Cardiac Intensive Care Unit, TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Brusca SB, Galiatsatos P, Warner S, Li X, Powell-Wiley TM, Kadri SS, Solomon MA. Outcomes of Patients With Primary Cardiac Diagnoses Admitted to Cardiac vs Noncardiac Intensive Care Units. JACC. ADVANCES 2022; 1:100114. [PMID: 36466046 PMCID: PMC9718493 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/18/2022] [Indexed: 06/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Demographics in cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) have evolved, with increased prevalence of noncardiac critical illnesses. OBJECTIVES This study compares outcomes of patients with primary cardiac diagnoses admitted to CICUs vs those of patients with primary cardiac diagnoses admitted to noncardiac ICUs. METHODS The Cerner Health Facts Database was queried to identify adults with primary cardiac diagnoses admitted to ICUs within 48 hours of presentation between 2009 and 2014. Only hospitals with multiple ICUs including a CICU were studied. Information on ICU staffing was not available. A univariate analysis of ICU type (model 1) and multivariate analyses incorporating patient- and hospital-level variables (model 2) and concurrent, noncardiac, ICU-level diagnoses (model 3) were utilized to assess the impact of ICU type on inpatient mortality. RESULTS Of 16,163 encounters across 14 hospitals, 8,499 (52.6%) were admitted to CICUs and 7,664 (47.4%) to noncardiac ICUs. Univariate analysis (model 1) demonstrated increased mortality in noncardiac ICUs compared to CICUs (odds ratio [OR]: 1.47, 95% CI: 1.32-1.64; P < 0.0001). This risk dissipated (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.91-1.18; P = 0.56) after controlling for patient- and hospital-level variables (model 2). Inclusion of concurrent, noncardiac, ICU-level diagnoses (model 3) lead to a reversal with decreased mortality in noncardiac ICUs (OR: 0.86, 95% CI: 0.76-0.98; P = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS In this historical cohort study evaluating CICU outcomes prior to the evolution of proposed staffing and care model modernization, survival of cardiac patients with concurrent, noncardiac critical illnesses may have been better with the expertise available in general system ICUs. These results may support contemporary efforts to increase the capacity to manage noncardiac critical illnesses in CICUs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel B. Brusca
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Panagis Galiatsatos
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Sarah Warner
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Xiaobai Li
- Biostatistics and Epidemiology Service, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Tiffany M. Powell-Wiley
- Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Intramural Research Program, National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Sameer S. Kadri
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael A. Solomon
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
- Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
van Diepen S, Horowitz JM. Multiple Layers of Care and Risk: Comparing Cross-Specialty Outcomes Using Regional, Hospital, and Patient-Level Data. JACC. ADVANCES 2022; 1:100115. [PMID: 38939699 PMCID: PMC11198560 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - James M. Horowitz
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Relation of Ischemic Heart Disease to Outcomes in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome. Am J Cardiol 2022; 176:24-29. [PMID: 35606175 DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2022.04.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2022] [Revised: 03/29/2022] [Accepted: 04/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Patients with ischemic heart disease (IHD) are often excluded from acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) clinical trials. As a result, little is known about the impact of IHD in this population. We sought to assess the association between IHD and clinical outcomes in patients with ARDS. Participants from 4 ARDS randomized controlled trials with shared study criteria, definitions, and end points were included. Using multivariable logistic regression, we assessed for the association between IHD and a primary outcome of 60-day mortality. Secondary outcomes included 90-day mortality, 28-day ventilator-free days, and 28-day organ failure. Among 1,909 patients, 102 had a history of IHD (5.4%). Patients with IHD were more likely to be older and male (p <0.05). Noncardiac co-morbidities, severity of illness, and other markers of ARDS severity were not statistically different (all, p >0.05). Patients with IHD had a higher 60-day (39.2% vs 23.3%, p <0.001) and 90-day (40.2% vs 24.0%, p <0.001) mortality, and experienced more frequent renal (45.1% vs 32.0%, p = 0.006) and hepatic (35.3% vs 25.2%, p = 0.023) failure. After multivariable adjustment, 60-day (odds ratio [OR] 1.76; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07 to 2.89, p = 0.025) and 90-day (OR 1.74; 95% CI: 1.06 to 2.85, p = 0.028) mortality remained higher. IHD was associated with 10% fewer ventilator-free days (incidence rate ratio 0.90; 95% CI: 0.85 to 0.96, p = 0.001). In conclusion, co-morbid IHD was associated with higher mortality and fewer ventilator-free days in patients with ARDS. Future studies are needed to identify predictors of mortality and improve treatment paradigms in this critically ill subgroup of patients.
Collapse
|
18
|
Thomas A, van Diepen S, Beekman R, Sinha SS, Brusca SB, Alviar CL, Jentzer J, Bohula EA, Katz JN, Shahu A, Barnett C, Morrow DA, Gilmore EJ, Solomon MA, Miller PE. Oxygen Supplementation and Hyperoxia in Critically Ill Cardiac Patients: From Pathophysiology to Clinical Practice. JACC. ADVANCES 2022; 1:100065. [PMID: 36238193 PMCID: PMC9555075 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2022.100065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Oxygen supplementation has been a mainstay in the management of patients with acute cardiac disease. While hypoxia is known to be detrimental, the adverse effects of artificially high oxygen levels (hyperoxia) have only recently been recognized. Hyperoxia may induce harmful hemodynamic effects, including peripheral and coronary vasoconstriction, and direct cellular toxicity through the production of reactive oxygen species. In addition, emerging evidence has shown that hyperoxia is associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Thus, it is essential for the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) clinician to understand the available evidence and titrate oxygen therapies to specific goals. This review summarizes the pathophysiology of oxygen within the cardiovascular system and the association between supplemental oxygen and hyperoxia in patients with common CICU diagnoses, including acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, shock, cardiac arrest, pulmonary hypertension, and respiratory failure. Finally, we highlight lessons learned from available trials, gaps in knowledge, and future directions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alexander Thomas
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Rachel Beekman
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Shashank S. Sinha
- Inova Heart and Vascular Institute, Inova Fairfax Medical Center, Falls Church, VA
| | - Samuel B. Brusca
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - Carlos L. Alviar
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Jacob Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Erin A. Bohula
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Jason N. Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC
| | - Andi Shahu
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Christopher Barnett
- Division of Cardiology, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA
| | - David A. Morrow
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Emily J. Gilmore
- Department of Neurology, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| | - Michael A. Solomon
- Critical Care Medicine Department, National Institutes of Health Clinical Center and Cardiovascular Branch, National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, of the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - P. Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The modern cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) has evolved into a high-intensity unit that cares for critically ill patients. Despite this transformation, changes to the staffing model and organizational structure in these specialized units have only recently begun to meet these challenges. We describe the most recent evidence which will inform future CICU staffing models. RECENT FINDINGS In the United States, the majority of CICUs are open as opposed to closed units, yet recent data suggests that transition to a closed staffing model is associated with a decrease in mortality. These reductions in mortality in closed CICUs are most pronounced in the most critically ill populations, such as patients with mechanical circulatory support, cardiac arrest, and respiratory failure. In addition, one study has shown that transition to a cardiac intensivist staffed CICU was associated with a reduction in mortality. Finally, multidisciplinary and protocolized teams imbedded within the CICU, specifically 'shock teams,' have recently been developed and may reduce mortality in this particularly sick patient population. SUMMARY Although the preponderance of data suggests improved outcomes with a closed, intensivist staffed CICU model, future multicenter studies are needed to better define the ideal staffing models for the contemporary CICU.
Collapse
|
20
|
Affiliation(s)
- P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine Yale School of Medicine New Haven CT
| | - Jacob Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine Mayo Clinic Rochester MN
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Duke University Durham NC
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Il'Giovine ZJ, Starling RC. Needing to vent: best to pitch the vent before heart transplant. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:852-854. [PMID: 34518879 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Zachary J Il'Giovine
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Desk J3-4, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| | - Randall C Starling
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Heart, Vascular and Thoracic Institute, Kaufman Center for Heart Failure Treatment and Recovery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Desk J3-4, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Metkus TS, Lindsley J, Fair L, Riley S, Berry S, Sahetya S, Hsu S, Gilotra NA. Quality of Heart Failure Care in the Intensive Care Unit. J Card Fail 2021; 27:1111-1125. [PMID: 34625130 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.08.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Revised: 08/03/2021] [Accepted: 08/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Patients with heart failure (HF) who are seen in an intensive care unit (ICU) manifest the highest-risk, most complex and most resource-intensive disease states. These patients account for a large relative proportion of days spent in an ICU. The paradigms by which critical care is provided to patients with HF are being reconsidered, including consideration of various multidisciplinary ICU staffing models and the development of acute-response teams. Traditional HF quality initiatives have centered on the peri- and postdischarge period in attempts to improve adherence to guideline-directed therapies and reduce readmissions. There is a compelling rationale for expanding high-quality efforts in treating patients with HF who are receiving critical care so we can improve outcomes, reduce preventable harm, improve teamwork and resource use, and achieve high health-system performance. Our goal is to answer the following question: For a patient with HF in the ICU, what is required for the provision of high-quality care? Herein, we first review the epidemiology of HF syndromes in the ICU and identify relevant critical care and quality stakeholders in HF. We next discuss the tenets of high-quality care for patients with HF in the ICU that will optimize critical care outcomes, such as ICU staffing models and evidence-based management of cardiac and noncardiac disease. We discuss strategies to mitigate preventable harm, improve ICU culture and conduct outcomes review, and we conclude with our summative vision of high-quality of ICU care for patients with HF; our vision includes clinical excellence, teamwork and ICU culture.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas S Metkus
- The Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
| | | | - Linda Fair
- Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sarah Riley
- The Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Stephen Berry
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Sarina Sahetya
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Steven Hsu
- The Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Nisha A Gilotra
- The Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nandiwada S, Islam S, Jentzer JC, Miller PE, Fordyce CB, Lawler P, Alviar CL, Sun LY, Dover DC, Lopes RD, Kaul P, van Diepen S. The association between cardiac intensive care unit mechanical ventilation volumes and in-hospital mortality. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL. ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:797-805. [PMID: 34318875 PMCID: PMC9067446 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 06/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
AIMS The incidence of respiratory failure and use of invasive or non-invasive mechanical ventilation (MV) in the cardiac intensive care units (CICUs) is increasing. While institutional MV volumes are associated with reduced mortality in medical and surgical ICUs, this volume-mortality relationship has not been characterized in the CICU. METHODS AND RESULTS National population-based data were used to identify patients admitted to CICUs (2005-2015) requiring MV in Canada. CICUs were categorized into low (≤100), intermediate (101-300), and high (>300) volume centres based on spline knots identified in the association between annual MV volume and mortality. Outcomes of interest included all-cause in-hospital mortality, the proportion of patients requiring prolonged MV (>96 h) and CICU length of stay (LOS). Among 47 173 CICU admissions requiring MV, 89.5% (42 200) required invasive MV. The median annual CICU MV volume was 43 (inter-hospital range 1-490). Compared to low-volume centres (35.9%), in-hospital mortality was lower in intermediate [29.2%, adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.84, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72-0.97, P = 0.019] and high-volume (18.2%; aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.66-1.02, P = 0.076) centres. Prolonged MV was higher in low-volume (29.2%) compared to high-volume (14.8%, aOR 0.70, 95% CI 0.55-0.89, P = 0.003) and intermediate-volume (23.0%, aOR 0.85, 95% CI 0.68-1.06, P = 0.14] centres. Mortality and prolonged MV were lower in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)-capable and academic centres, but a shorter CICU LOS was observed only in subgroup of PCI-capable intermediate- and high-volume hospitals. CONCLUSIONS In a national dataset, we observed that higher CICU MV volumes were associated with lower incidence of in-hospital mortality, prolonged MV, and CICU LOS. Our data highlight the need for minimum MV volume benchmarks for CICUs caring for patients with respiratory failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shiva Nandiwada
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sunjidatul Islam
- Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Christopher B Fordyce
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Patrick Lawler
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Interdepartmental Division of Critical Care Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Carlos L Alviar
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Louise Y Sun
- Division of Cardiac Anesthesiology, University of Ottawa Heart Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Douglas C Dover
- Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Padma Kaul
- Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Sean van Diepen
- Canadian VIGOUR Center, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Critical Care Medicine and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Cardiogenic shock is a complex clinical syndrome of end-organ hypoperfusion due to impaired cardiac performance. Although cardiogenic shock has traditionally been viewed as a monolithic disorder predominantly caused by severe left ventricular dysfunction complicating acute myocardial infarction (AMI), there is increasing recognition of the diverse causes of cardiogenic shock and wide spectrum of clinical severity. The purpose of this review is to describe the contemporary epidemiology of cardiogenic shock, including trends in clinical outcomes and recent efforts to refine risk assessment. RECENT FINDINGS The incidence of cardiogenic shock among patients with AMI has remained remarkably stable at 3-10%; however, the proportion of cardiogenic shock cases related to AMI has decreased over time to ∼30%, while the proportion of cardiogenic shock cases due to acute decompensated heart failure has steadily increased. Estimated in-hospital mortality from cardiogenic shock in contemporary registries is approximately 30-40%, suggesting modest improvement in cardiogenic shock outcomes over the last decade. There is a wide spectrum of clinical severity among patients presenting with cardiogenic shock, which is described by the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions clinical staging criteria. SUMMARY Improved clinical characterization and risk assessment of patients with cardiogenic shock may facilitate more effective clinical investigations of this morbid clinical syndrome.
Collapse
|
25
|
Jentzer JC, Alviar CL, Miller PE, Metkus T, Bennett CE, Morrow DA, Barsness GW, Kashani KB, Gajic O. Trends in Therapy and Outcomes Associated With Respiratory Failure in Patients Admitted to the Cardiac Intensive Care Unit. J Intensive Care Med 2021; 37:543-554. [PMID: 33759608 DOI: 10.1177/08850666211003489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/26/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe the epidemiology, outcomes, and temporal trends of respiratory failure in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). MATERIALS AND METHODS Retrospective cohort analysis of 2,986 unique Mayo Clinic CICU patients from 2007 to 2018 with respiratory failure. Temporal trends were analyzed, along with hospital and 1-year mortality. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine adjusted hospital mortality trends. RESULTS The prevalence of respiratory failure in the CICU increased from 15% to 38% during the study period (P < 0.001 for trend). Among patients with respiratory failure, the utilization of invasive ventilation decreased and noninvasive ventilation modalities increased over time. Hospital mortality and 1-year mortality were 24% and 54%, respectively, with variation according to the type of respiratory support (highest among patients receiving invasive ventilation alone: 35% and 46%, respectively). Hospital mortality was highest among patients with concomitant cardiac arrest and/or shock (52% for patients with both). Hospital mortality decreased in the overall population from 35% to 25% (P < 0.001 for trend), but was unchanged among patients receiving positive-pressure ventilation. CONCLUSIONS The prevalence of respiratory failure in CICU more than doubled during the last decade. The use of noninvasive respiratory support increased, while overall mortality declined over time. Cardiac arrest and shock accounted for the majority of deaths. Further research is needed to optimize the outcomes of high-risk CICU patients with respiratory failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob C Jentzer
- Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.,Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| | - Carlos L Alviar
- The Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Bellevue Hospital Center, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| | - P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, CT, USA.,Yale National Clinician Scholars Program, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Thomas Metkus
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | | | - David A Morrow
- TIMI Study Group, Cardiovascular Division, Brigham and Women's Hospital, and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kianoush B Kashani
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA.,Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | - Ognjen Gajic
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester MN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Proudfoot AG, Jain A. Striking the balance in admissions with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction requiring advanced respiratory support. EUROPEAN HEART JOURNAL-ACUTE CARDIOVASCULAR CARE 2021; 10:116-118. [PMID: 33724347 DOI: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuab004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Alastair G Proudfoot
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Department of Perioperative Medicine, West Smithfield, London, UK.,William Harvey Research Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.,Charité - Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Germany.,Deutsches Herzzentrum Berlin, Berlin,Germany
| | - Ajay Jain
- Barts Heart Centre, St Bartholomew's Hospital, Department of Perioperative Medicine, West Smithfield, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Miller PE, Van Diepen S, Metkus TS, Alviar CL, Rayner-Hartley E, Rathwell S, Katz JN, Ezekowitz J, Desai NR, Ahmad T. Association between Respiratory Failure and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Acute Heart Failure: Analysis of 5 Pooled Clinical Trials. J Card Fail 2021; 27:602-606. [PMID: 33556546 DOI: 10.1016/j.cardfail.2021.01.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 01/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite a temporal increase in respiratory failure in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure (HF), clinical trials have largely not reported the incidence or associated clinical outcomes for patients requiring mechanical ventilation. METHODS AND RESULTS After pooling 5 acute HF clinical trials, we used multivariable logistic regression adjusted for demographics, comorbidities, examinations, and laboratory findings to assess associations between mechanical ventilation and clinical outcomes. Among the 8296 patients, 210 (2.5%) required mechanical ventilation. Age, sex, smoking history, baseline ejection fraction, HF etiology, and the proportion of patients randomized to treatment or placebo in the original clinical trial were similar between groups (all, P > 0.05). Baseline diabetes mellitus was more common in the mechanical ventilation group (P = 0.02), but other comorbidities, including chronic lung disease, were otherwise similar (all P > 0.05). HF rehospitalization at 30 days (12.7% vs 6.6%, P < 0.001) and all-cause 60-day mortality (33.3% vs 6.1%, P < 0.001) was higher among patients requiring mechanical ventilation. After multivariable adjustment, mechanical ventilation use was associated with an increased 30-day HF rehospitalization (odds ratio 2.03; 95% confidence interval, 1.29-3.21, P = 0.002), 30-day mortality (odds ratio 10.40; 95% confidence interval, 7.22-14.98, P < 0.001), and 60-day mortality (odds ratio 7.68; 95% confidence interval, 5.50-10.74, P < 0.001). The influence of mechanical ventilation did not differ by HF etiology or baseline ejection fraction (both, interaction P > 0.20). CONCLUSIONS Respiratory failure during an index hospitalization for acute HF was associated with increased rehospitalization and all-cause mortality. The development of respiratory failure during an acute HF admission identifies a particularly vulnerable population, which should be identified for closer monitoring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Elliott Miller
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut; Yale National Clinicians Scholar Program, New Haven, Connecticut.
| | - Sean Van Diepen
- Department of Critical Care and Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
| | - Thomas S Metkus
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Carlos L Alviar
- Leon H. Charney Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | - Erin Rayner-Hartley
- Division of Cardiology, Royal Columbian Hospital, University of British Columbia, New Westminster, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Sarah Rathwell
- Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Jason N Katz
- Division of Cardiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina
| | - Justin Ezekowitz
- Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Canadian VIGOUR Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Nihar R Desai
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Tariq Ahmad
- Section of Cardiovascular Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| |
Collapse
|