Pediatric Ventilation Liberation: A Survey of International Practice Among 555 Pediatric Intensivists

Framework for Research Gaps in Pediatric Ventilator Liberation

BACKGROUND

The 2023 International Pediatric Ventilator Liberation Clinical Practice Guidelines provided evidence-based recommendations to guide pediatric critical care providers on how to perform daily aspects of ventilator liberation. However, because of the lack of high-quality pediatric studies, most recommendations were conditional based on very low to low certainty of evidence.

RESEARCH QUESTION

What are the research gaps related to pediatric ventilator liberation that can be studied to strengthen the evidence for future updates of the guidelines?

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted systematic reviews of the literature in eight predefined Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome (PICO) areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation to generate recommendations. Subgroups responsible for each PICO question subsequently identified major research gaps by synthesizing the literature. These gaps were presented at an international symposium at the Pediatric Acute Lung Injury and Sepsis Investigators meeting in spring 2022 for open discussion. Feedback was incorporated, and final evaluation of research gaps are summarized herein. Although randomized controlled trials (RCTs) represent the highest level of evidence, the panel sought to highlight areas where alternative study designs also may be appropriate, given challenges with conducting large multicenter RCTs in children.

RESULTS

Significant research gaps were identified in six broad areas related to pediatric ventilator liberation. Several of these areas necessitate multicenter RCTs to provide definitive results, whereas other gaps can be addressed with multicenter observational studies or quality improvement initiatives. Furthermore, a need for some physiologic studies in several areas remains, particularly regarding newer diagnostic methods to improve identification of patients at high risk of extubation failure.

INTERPRETATION

Although pediatric ventilator liberation guidelines have been created, the certainty of evidence remains low and multiple research gaps exist that should be filled through high-quality RCTs, multicenter observational studies, and quality improvement initiatives.

Weaning from noninvasive respiratory support in children in acute settings: Expert consensus statement using modified Delphi methodology

OBJECTIVE

To reach a consensus on the definition and modalities of weaning from noninvasive ventilation in acute settings.

DESIGN

A modified Delphi survey using closed and open-ended questions.

SETTING

Three rounds of consensus determination were sent via electronic mail survey to 33 experts. The survey questionnaire had four sections: definition of weaning, definition of weaning failure, criteria to initiate weaning, and modalities of weaning. Questions where agreement had been reached on round 1 were no longer part of the survey in rounds 2 and 3.

SUBJECTS

Twenty-five international experts from 10 countries.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Overall, this survey generated positive consensus from experts for 19/35 statements (9 with strong agreement and 10 with weak agreement) about weaning from noninvasive respiratory support. No negative consensus could be identified.

CONCLUSION

The clinical practice statements issued address important aspects of definition of weaning, definition of weaning failure, criteria to initiate weaning, and modalities of weaning in acute settings.

Predicting Duration of Invasive Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric ICU

BACKGROUND

Timely ventilator liberation can prevent morbidities associated with invasive mechanical ventilation in the pediatric ICU (PICU). There currently exists no standard benchmark for duration of invasive mechanical ventilation in the PICU. This study sought to develop and validate a multi-center prediction model of invasive mechanical ventilation duration to determine a standardized duration of invasive mechanical ventilation ratio.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study using registry data from 157 institutions in the Virtual Pediatric Systems database. The study population included encounters in the PICU between 2012-2021 involving endotracheal intubation and invasive mechanical ventilation in the first day of PICU admission who received invasive mechanical ventilation for > 24 h. Subjects were stratified into a training cohort (2012-2017) and 2 validation cohorts (2018-2019/2020-2021). Four models to predict the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation were trained using data from the first 24 h, validated, and compared.

RESULTS

The study included 112,353 unique encounters. All models had observed-to-expected (O/E) ratios close to one but low mean squared error and R2 values. The random forest model was the best performing model and achieved an O/E ratio of 1.043 (95% CI 1.030-1.056) and 1.004 (95% CI 0.990-1.019) in the validation cohorts and 1.009 (95% CI 1.004-1.016) in the full cohort. There was a high degree of institutional variation, with single-unit O/E ratios ranging between 0.49-1.91. When stratified by time period, there were observable changes in O/E ratios at the individual PICU level over time.

CONCLUSIONS

We derived and validated a model to predict the duration of invasive mechanical ventilation that performed well in aggregated predictions at the PICU and the cohort level. This model could be beneficial in quality improvement and institutional benchmarking initiatives for use at the PICU level and for tracking of performance over time.

Noninvasive Ventilation or CPAP for Postextubation Support in Small Infants

BACKGROUND

Infants with a high risk of extubation failure are often treated with noninvasive ventilation (NIV) or CPAP, but data on the role of these support modalities following extubation are sparse. This report describes our experience using NIV or CPAP to support infants following extubation in our pediatric ICUs (PICUs).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective study of children < 10 kg receiving postextubation NIV or CPAP in our PICUs. Data on demographics, medical history, type of support, vital signs, pulse oximetry, near-infrared spectroscopy (NIRS), gas exchange, support settings, and re-intubation were extracted from the electronic medical record. Support was classified as prophylactic if planned before extubation and rescue if initiated within 24 h of extubation. We compared successfully extubated and re-intubated subjects using chi-square test for categorical variables and Mann-Whitney test for continuous variables.

RESULTS

We studied 51 subjects, median age 44 (interquartile range 0.5-242) d and weight 3.7 (3-4.9) kg. There were no demographic differences between groups, except those re-intubated were more likely to have had cardiac surgery prior to admission (0% vs 14%, P = .040). NIV was used in 31 (61%) and CPAP in 20 (39%) subjects. Prophylactic support was initiated in 25 subjects (49%), whereas rescue support was needed in 26 subjects (51%). Twenty-two subjects (43%) required re-intubation. Re-intubation rate was higher for rescue support (58% vs 28%, P = .032). Subjects with a pH < 7.35 (4.3% vs 42.0%, P = .003) and lower somatic NIRS (39 [24-56] vs 62 [46-72], P = .02) were more likely to be re-intubated. The inspiratory positive airway pressure, expiratory positive airway pressure, and FIO2 were higher in subjects who required re-intubation.

CONCLUSIONS

NIV or CPAP use was associated with a re-intubation rate of 43% in a heterogeneous sample of high-risk infants. Acidosis, cardiac surgery, higher FIO2 , lower somatic NIRS, higher support settings, and application of rescue support were associated with the need for re-intubation.

Pediatric Ventilator Liberation: One-Hour Versus Two-Hour Spontaneous Breathing Trials in a Single Center

BACKGROUND

The optimal spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) duration is not known for children who are critically ill. The study objective was to evaluate extubation outcomes between cohorts exposed to a 1- or 2-h SBT.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of a quality improvement project database in a 24-bed pediatric ICU. The intervention was a respiratory therapist-driven SBT clinical pathway across 2 improvement cycles by using a 2- or 1-h SBT. The primary outcomes were extubation failure and rescue noninvasive ventilation in the first 48 h. Secondary outcomes included SBT results and process measures.

RESULTS

There were 218 and 305 encounters in the 2- and 1-h cohorts, respectively. Extubation failure (7.3 vs 8.5%; P = .62) and rescue noninvasive ventilation rates (9.3 vs 8.2%; P = .68) were similar. In logistic regression models, SBT duration was not independently associated with either primary outcome. Extubation after 1-h SBT failure was associated with significantly higher odds of rescue noninvasive ventilation exposure (odds ratio 3.94, 95% CI 1.3-11.9; P = .02). SBT results were not associated with odds of extubation failure. There were 1,072 (2 h) and 1,333 (1 h) SBTs performed. The 1-h SBT pass rate was significantly higher versus the 2-h SBT (71.4 vs 51.1%; P < .001). Among all failed SBTs, the top 3 reported failure modes were tidal volume ≤ 5 mL/kg (23.6%), breathing frequency increase > 30% (21%), and oxygen saturation < 92% (17.3%). When considering all failed SBTs, 75.5% of failures occurred before 45 min.

CONCLUSIONS

A 1-h SBT may be a viable alternative to a 2-h version for the average child who is critically ill. Further, a 1-h SBT may better balance extubation outcomes and duration of invasive ventilation for the general pediatric ICU population.