Status Epilepticus: Impact of Therapeutic Coma on Outcome*

Relationship between continuous EEG monitoring findings and prognostic factors in patients with status epilepticus

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Little information is available regarding the use of continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) monitoring findings to predict the prognosis of patients with status epilepticus, which could aid in prognostication. This study investigated the relationship between cEEG monitoring findings and various prognostic indicators in patients with status epilepticus.

METHODS

We reviewed the clinical profiles and cEEG monitoring data of 28 patients with status epilepticus over a ten-year period. Patient demographics, etiology, EEG features, duration of hospital stay, number of antiseizure medications, and outcome measures were analyzed. Functional outcomes were assessed using the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), which evaluates the degree of daily living impairment and dependence on others resulting from neurological injury.

RESULTS

Patients exhibiting electrographic status epilepticus (ESE) demonstrated significantly longer duration of status epilepticus (77.75 ± 58.25 vs. 39.86 ± 29.81 h, p = 0.024) and total length of hospital stay (13.00 ± 6.14 vs. 8.14 ± 5.66 days, p = 0.038) when compared to those with ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). Individuals who displayed any increase in modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score between their premorbid state and discharge also had significantly longer duration of status epilepticus (74.09 ± 34.94 vs. 51.56 ± 54.25 h, p = 0.041) and total length of hospital stay (15.89 ± 6.05 vs. 8.05 ± 4.80 days, p = 0.004) when compared to those who showed no difference. The most prevalent etiology of status epilepticus in our study was chronic structural brain lesions.

CONCLUSIONS

This suggests that ESE may serve as a predictor of prolonged duration of status epilepticus and increased hospitalization among patients with status epilepticus.

ICU-Electroencephalogram Unit Improves Outcome in Status Epilepticus Patients: A Retrospective Before-After Study

OBJECTIVES

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring is recommended for status epilepticus (SE) management in ICU but is still underused due to resource limitations and inconclusive evidence regarding its impact on outcome. Furthermore, the term "continuous monitoring" often implies continuous recording with variable intermittent review. The establishment of a dedicated ICU-electroencephalogram unit may fill this gap, allowing cEEG with nearly real-time review and multidisciplinary management collaboration. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishing on SE outcome and management.

DESIGN

Single-center retrospective before-after study.

SETTING

Neuro-ICU of a Swiss academic tertiary medical care center.

PATIENTS

Adult patients treated for nonhypoxic SE between November 1, 2015, and December 31, 2023.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENT AND MAIN RESULTS

Data from all SE patients were assessed, comparing those treated before and after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function, ICU mortality, SE duration, and ICU SE management. Secondary outcomes were SE type and etiology. Two hundred seven SE patients were included, 149 (72%) before and 58 (38%) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit establishment. ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction was associated with increased detection of nonconvulsive SE (p = 0.003) and SE due to acute symptomatic etiology (p = 0.019). Regression analysis considering age, comorbidities, SE etiology, and SE semeiology revealed a higher chance of returning to premorbid neurologic function (p = 0.002), reduced SE duration (p = 0.024), and a shift in SE management with increased use of antiseizure medications (p = 0.007) after ICU-electroencephalogram unit introduction.

CONCLUSIONS

Integrating neurology expertise in the ICU setting through the establishment of an ICU-electroencephalogram unit with nearly real-time cEEG review, shortened SE duration, and increased likelihood of returning to premorbid neurologic function, with an increased number of antiseizure medications used. Further studies are warranted to validate these findings and assess long-term prognosis.

Risk factors and a predictive model for the occurrence of adverse outcomes in patients with new-onset refractory status epilepsy

Objectives

To determine risk factors for the occurrence of adverse outcomes in patients with new-onset refractory status epilepsy (NORSE) and to construct a concomitant nomogram.

Methods

Seventy-six adult patients with NORSE who were admitted to the Department of Neurology, First Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University between January 2016 and December 2022 were enrolled for the study. Participants were divided into two-those with good and poor functional outcomes-and their pertinent data was obtained from the hospital medical recording system. Univariate analysis was used to identify potential causes of poor outcomes in both groups and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for the occurrence of poor outcomes. Using the R programming language RMS package, a nomogram was created to predict the occurrence of poor outcomes.

Results

The NORSE risk of adverse outcome nomogram model included four predictors, namely duration of mechanical ventilation (OR = 4.370, 95% CI 1.221-15.640, p = 0.023), antiviral therapy (OR = 0.045, 95% CI 0.005-0.399, p = 0.005), number of anesthetics (OR = 13.428, 95% CI 2.16-83.48, p = 0.005) and neutrophil count/lymphocyte count ratio (NLR) (OR = 5.248, 95% CI 1.509-18.252, p = 0.009). The nomogram had good consistency and discrimination in predicting risk and can thus assist clinical care providers to assess outcomes for NORSE patients. Through ordinary bootstrap analyses, the results of the original set prediction were confirmed as consistent with those of the test set.

Conclusion

The nomogram model of risk of adverse outcomes in NORSE adult patients developed in this study can facilitate clinicians to predict the risk of adverse outcomes in NORSE patients and make timely and reasonable interventions for patients at high risk of adverse outcomes.

Association Between Dose Escalation of Anesthetics and Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the association between dose escalation of continuously administered IV anesthetics and its duration with short-term outcomes in adult patients treated for refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

Clinical and electroencephalographic data of patients with RSE without hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy who were treated with anesthetics at a Swiss academic medical center from 2011 to 2019 were assessed. The frequency of anesthetic dose escalation (i.e., dose increase) and its associations with in-hospital death or return to premorbid neurologic function were primary endpoints. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify associations with endpoints.

RESULTS

Among 111 patients with RSE, doses of anesthetics were escalated in 57%. Despite patients with dose escalation having a higher morbidity (lower Glasgow Coma Scale [GCS] score at status epilepticus [SE] onset, more presumably fatal etiologies, longer duration of SE and intensive care, more infections, and arterial hypotension) as compared with patients without, the primary endpoints did not differ between these groups in univariable analyses. Multivariable analyses revealed decreased odds for death with dose escalation (odds ratio 0.09, 95% CI 0.01-0.86), independent of initial GCS score, presumably fatal etiology, SE severity score, SE duration, and nonconvulsive SE with coma, with similar functional outcome among survivors compared with patients without dose escalation.

DISCUSSION

Our study reveals that anesthetic dose escalation in adult patients with RSE is associated with decreased odds for death without increasing the proportion of surviving patients with worse neurofunctional state than before RSE.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that anesthetic dose escalation decreases the odds of death in patients with RSE.

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European academy of neurology registry on adult refractory status epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE)

BACKGROUND

Status Epilepticus (SE) is a common neurological emergency associated with a high rate of functional decline and mortality. Large randomized trials have addressed the early phases of treatment for convulsive SE. However, evidence regarding third-line anesthetic treatment and the treatment of nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is scarce. One trial addressing management of refractory SE with deep general anesthesia was terminated early due to insufficient recruitment. Multicenter prospective registries, including the Sustained Effort Network for treatment of Status Epilepticus (SENSE), have shed some light on these questions, but many answers are still lacking, such as the influence exerted by distinct EEG patterns in NCSE on the outcome. We therefore initiated a new prospective multicenter observational registry to collect clinical and EEG data that combined may further help in clinical decision-making and defining SE.

METHODS

Sustained effort network for treatment of status epilepticus/European Academy of Neurology Registry on refractory Status Epilepticus (SENSE-II/AROUSE) is a prospective, multicenter registry for patients treated for SE. The primary objectives are to document patient and SE characteristics, treatment modalities, EEG, neuroimaging data, and outcome of consecutive adults admitted for SE treatment in each of the participating centers and to identify factors associated with outcome and refractoriness. To reach sufficient statistical power for multivariate analysis, a cohort size of 3000 patients is targeted.

DISCUSSION

The data collected for the registry will provide both valuable EEG data and information about specific treatment steps in different patient groups with SE. Eventually, the data will support clinical decision-making and may further guide the planning of clinical trials. Finally, it could help to redefine NCSE and its management.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT number: NCT05839418.

Status epilepticus in the ICU

Status epilepticus (SE) is a common medical emergency associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Management that follows published guidelines is best suited to improve outcomes, with the most severe cases frequently being managed in the intensive care unit (ICU). Diagnosis of convulsive SE can be made without electroencephalography (EEG), but EEG is required to reliably diagnose nonconvulsive SE. Rapidly narrowing down underlying causes for SE is crucial, as this may guide additional management steps. Causes may range from underlying epilepsy to acute brain injuries such as trauma, cardiac arrest, stroke, and infections. Initial management consists of rapid administration of benzodiazepines and one of the following non-sedating intravenous antiseizure medications (ASM): (fos-)phenytoin, levetiracetam, or valproate; other ASM are increasingly used, such as lacosamide or brivaracetam. SE that continues despite these medications is called refractory, and most commonly treated with continuous infusions of midazolam or propofol. Alternatives include further non-sedating ASM and non-pharmacologic approaches. SE that reemerges after weaning or continues despite management with propofol or midazolam is labeled super-refractory SE. At this step, management may include non-sedating or sedating compounds including ketamine and barbiturates. Continuous video EEG is necessary for the management of refractory and super-refractory SE, as these are almost always nonconvulsive. If possible, management of the underlying cause of seizures is crucial particularly for patients with autoimmune encephalitis. Short-term mortality ranges from 10 to 15% after SE and is primarily related to increasing age, underlying etiology, and medical comorbidities. Refractoriness of treatment is clearly related to outcome with mortality rising from 10% in responsive cases, to 25% in refractory, and nearly 40% in super-refractory SE.

How much refractory is 'refractory status epilepticus'? A retrospective study of treatment strategies and clinical outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to evaluate whether differences in clinical outcomes exist according to treatments received and seizure activity resolution in patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

Consecutive episodes of non-hypoxic status epilepticus (SE) in patients ≥ 14 years old were included. Episodes of RSE were stratified in: (i) SE persistent despite treatment with first-line therapy with benzodiazepines and one second-line treatment with antiseizure medications (ASMs), but responsive to successive treatments with ASMs (RSE-rASMs); (ii) SE persistent despite treatment with first-line therapy with benzodiazepines and successive treatment with one or more second-line ASMs, but responsive to anesthetic drugs [RSE-rGA (general anesthesia)]. Study endpoints were mortality during hospitalization and worsening of modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge.

RESULTS

Status epilepticus was responsive in 298 (54.1%), RSE-rASMs in 152 (27.6%), RSE-rGA in 46 (8.3%), and super-refractory (SRSE) in 55 (10.0%) out of 551 included cases. Death during hospitalization occurred in 98 (17.8%) and worsening of mRS at discharge in 287 (52.1%) cases. Multivariable analyses revealed increased odds of in-hospital mortality with RSE-rGA (odds ratio [OR] 3.05, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.27-7.35) and SRSE (OR 3.83, 95%. CI 1.73-8.47), and increased odds of worsening of mRS with RSE-rASMs (OR 2.06, 95% CI 1.28-3.31), RSE-rGA (OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.97-10.00), and SRSE (OR 13.81, 95% CI 5.34-35.67).

CONCLUSIONS

In RSE, varying degrees of refractoriness may be defined and suit better the continuum spectrum of disease severity and the heterogeneity of SE burden and prognosis.

Further advances in epilepsy

In 2017, one of us reviewed advances in epilepsy (Manford in J Neurol 264:1811-1824, 2017). The current paper brings that review up to date and gives a slight change in emphasis. Once again, the story is of evolution rather than revolution. In recognition that most of our current medications act on neurotransmitters or ion channels, and not on the underlying changes in connectivity and pathways, they have been renamed as antiseizure (ASM) medications rather than antiepileptic drugs. Cenobamate is the one newly licensed medication for broader use in focal epilepsy but there have been a number of developments for specific disorders. We review new players and look forward to new developments in the light of evolving underlying science. We look at teratogenicity; old villains and new concerns in which clinicians play a vital role in explaining and balancing the risks. Medical treatment of status epilepticus, long without evidence, has benefitted from high-quality trials to inform practice; like buses, several arriving at once. Surgical treatment continues to be refined with improvements in the pre-surgical evaluation of patients, especially with new imaging techniques. Alternatives including stereotactic radiotherapy have received further focus and targets for palliative stimulation techniques have grown in number. Individuals' autonomy and quality of life continue to be the subject of research with refinement of what clinicians can do to help persons with epilepsy (PWE) achieve control. This includes seizure management but extends to broader considerations of human empowerment, needs and desires, which may be aided by emerging technologies such as seizure detection devices. The role of specialist nurses in improving that quality has been reinforced by specific endorsement from the International League against Epilepsy (ILAE).

Duration of constant rate infusion with diazepam or propofol for canine cluster seizures and status epilepticus

Introduction

Constant rate infusion (CRI) of benzodiazepines or propofol (PPF) is a therapeutic option for cluster seizures (CS) and status epilepticus (SE) in canine patients non-responding to first-line benzodiazepines or non-anesthetics. However, specific indications for optimal duration of CRI are lacking. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of duration of anesthetic CRI on outcome and length of hospital stay in dogs with refractory seizure activity of different etiology.

Study design

Open-label non-randomized clinical trial.

Materials and methods

Seventy-three client-owned dogs were enrolled. Two groups [experimental (EXP) vs. control (CTRL)] were compared. The EXP group received diazepam (DZP) or PPF CRI for 12 h (±1 h) and the CTRL group received DZP or PPF CRI for 24 h (±1 h) in addition to a standardized emergency treatment protocol identical for both study groups. The historical control group was made up of a population of dogs already reported in a previously published paper by the same authors. Favorable outcome was defined as seizure cessation after CRI, no seizure recurrence, and clinical recovery. Poor outcome was defined as seizure recurrence, death in hospital or no return to acceptable clinical baseline. Univariate statistical analysis was performed.

Results

The study sample was 73 dogs: 45 (62%) received DZP CRI and 28 (38%) received PPF CRI. The EXP group was 39 dogs (25 DZP CRI and 14 PPF CRI) and the CTRL group 34 dogs (20 DZP CRI and 14 PPF CRI). We found no statistically significant difference in outcomes between the groups. The median length of stay was 56 h (IQR, 40-78) for the ALL EXP group and 58.5 h (IQR, 48-74.5) for the ALL CTRL group (p = 0.8).

Conclusion

Even though a shorter DZP or PPF CRI duration was not associated with a worse outcome, the study failed to identify a clear superiority of shorter CRI duration on outcome or length of hospital stay in dogs with refractory seizure activity of different etiology.

Effects of epileptiform activity on discharge outcome in critically ill patients in the USA: a retrospective cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Epileptiform activity is associated with worse patient outcomes, including increased risk of disability and death. However, the effect of epileptiform activity on neurological outcome is confounded by the feedback between treatment with antiseizure medications and epileptiform activity burden. We aimed to quantify the heterogeneous effects of epileptiform activity with an interpretability-centred approach.

METHODS

We did a retrospective, cross-sectional study of patients in the intensive care unit who were admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital (Boston, MA, USA). Participants were aged 18 years or older and had electrographic epileptiform activity identified by a clinical neurophysiologist or epileptologist. The outcome was the dichotomised modified Rankin Scale (mRS) at discharge and the exposure was epileptiform activity burden defined as mean or maximum proportion of time spent with epileptiform activity in 6 h windows in the first 24 h of electroencephalography. We estimated the change in discharge mRS if everyone in the dataset had experienced a specific epileptiform activity burden and were untreated. We combined pharmacological modelling with an interpretable matching method to account for confounding and epileptiform activity-antiseizure medication feedback. The quality of the matched groups was validated by the neurologists.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 1, 2011, and Oct 14, 2017, 1514 patients were admitted to Massachusetts General Hospital intensive care unit, 995 (66%) of whom were included in the analysis. Compared with patients with a maximum epileptiform activity of 0 to less than 25%, patients with a maximum epileptiform activity burden of 75% or more when untreated had a mean 22·27% (SD 0·92) increased chance of a poor outcome (severe disability or death). Moderate but long-lasting epileptiform activity (mean epileptiform activity burden 2% to <10%) increased the risk of a poor outcome by mean 13·52% (SD 1·93). The effect sizes were heterogeneous depending on preadmission profile-eg, patients with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy or acquired brain injury were more adversely affected compared with patients without these conditions.

INTERPRETATION

Our results suggest that interventions should put a higher priority on patients with an average epileptiform activity burden 10% or greater, and treatment should be more conservative when maximum epileptiform activity burden is low. Treatment should also be tailored to individual preadmission profiles because the potential for epileptiform activity to cause harm depends on age, medical history, and reason for admission.

FUNDING

National Institutes of Health and National Science Foundation.

Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with recurrent status epilepticus episodes

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have focused on medical and pharmacological treatments and outcome predictors of patients with status epilepticus (SE). However, a sufficient understanding of recurrent episodes of SE is lacking. Therefore, we reviewed recurrent SE episodes to investigate their clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with relapses.

METHODS

In this retrospective, multicenter study, we reviewed recurrent SE patient data covering 2011 to 2017 from the university hospitals of Frankfurt and Marburg, Germany. Clinical characteristics and outcome variables were compared among the first and subsequent SE episodes using a standardized form for data collection.

RESULTS

We identified 120 recurrent SE episodes in 80 patients (10.2% of all 1177 episodes). The mean age at the first SE episode was 62.2 years (median 66.5; SD 19.3; range 21-91), and 42 of these patients were male (52.5%). A mean of 262.4 days passed between the first and the second episode. Tonic-clonic seizure semiology and a cerebrovascular disease etiology were predominant in initial and recurrent episodes. After subsequent episodes, patients showed increased disability as indicated by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), and 9 out of 80 patients died during the second episode (11.3%). Increases in refractory and super-refractory SE (RSE and SRSE, respectively) were noted during the second episode, and the occurrence of a non-refractory SE (NRSE) during the first SE episode did not necessarily provide a protective marker for subsequent non-refractory episodes. An increase in the use of intravenous-available anti-seizure medication (ASM) was observed in the treatment of SE patients. Patients were discharged from hospital with a mean of 2.8 ± 1.0 ASMs after the second SE episode and 2.1 ± 1.2 ASMs after the first episode. Levetiracetam was the most common ASM used before admission and on discharge for SE patients.

CONCLUSIONS

This retrospective, multicenter study used the mRS to demonstrate worsened outcomes of patients at consecutive SE episodes. ASM accumulations after subsequent SE episodes were registered over the study period. The study results underline the necessity for improved clinical follow-ups and outpatient care to reduce the health care burden from recurrent SE episodes.

Midazolam, Ketamine, and Propofol: While We Slept, Others Worked on Anesthetizing Infusions for Refractory Status Epilepticus

Management of Refractory Status Epilepticus: An International Cohort Study (MORSE CODe) Analysis of Patients Managed in the ICU Chiu WT, Campozano V, Schiefecker A, Rodriguez DR, Ferreira D, Headlee A, Zeidan S, Grinea A, Huang YH, Doyle K, Shen Q, Gómez D, Hocker SE, Rohaut B, Sonneville R, Hong C-T, Demeret S, Kurtz P, Maldonado N, Helbok R, Fernandez T, Claassen J. Neurology . 2022;99(11):e1191-e1201. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000200818 Background and Objectives: Status epilepticus that continues after the initial benzodiazepine and a second anticonvulsant medication is known as refractory status epilepticus (RSE). Management is highly variable because adequately powered clinical trials are missing. We aimed to determine whether propofol and midazolam were equally effective in controlling RSE in the intensive care unit, focusing on management in resource-limited settings. Methods: Patients with RSE treated with midazolam or propofol between January 2015 and December 2018 were retrospectively identified among 9 centers across 4 continents from upper-middle-income economies in Latin America and high-income economies in North America, Europe, and Asia. Demographics, Status Epilepticus Severity Score, etiology, treatment details, and discharge modified Rankin Scale (mRS) were collected. The primary outcome measure was good functional outcome defined as a mRS score of 0-2 at hospital discharge. Results: Three hundred eighty-seven episodes of RSE (386 patients) were included, with 162 (42%) from upper-middle-income and 225 (58%) from high-income economies. Three hundred six (79%) had acute and 79 (21%) remote etiologies. Initial RSE management included midazolam in 266 (69%) and propofol in 121 episodes (31%). Seventy episodes (26%) that were initially treated with midazolam and 42 (35%) with propofol required the addition of a second anesthetic to treat RSE. Baseline characteristics and outcomes of patients treated with midazolam or propofol were similar. Breakthrough (odds ratio [OR] 1.6, 95% CI 1.3-2.0) and withdrawal seizures (OR 2.0, 95% CI 1.7-2.5) were associated with an increased number of days requiring continuous intravenous anticonvulsant medications (cIV-ACMs). Prolonged EEG monitoring was associated with fewer days of cIV-ACMs (1-24 hours OR 0.5, 95% CI 0.2-0.9, and >24 hours OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.5-1.0; reference EEG <1 hour). This association was seen in both, high-income and upper-middle-income economies, but was particularly prominent in high-income countries. One hundred ten patients (28%) were dead, and 80 (21%) had good functional outcomes at hospital discharge. Discussion: Outcomes of patients with RSE managed in the intensive care unit with propofol or midazolam infusions are comparable. Prolonged EEG monitoring may allow physicians to decrease the duration of anesthetic infusions safely, but this will depend on the implementation of RSE management protocols. Goal-directed management approaches including EEG targets may hold promise for patients with RSE. Ketamine for Management of Neonatal and Pediatric Refractory Status Epilepticus Jacobwitz M, Mulvihill C, Kaufman MC, Gonzalez AK, Resendiz K, MacDonald JM, Francoeur C, Helbig I, Topjian AA, Abend NS. Neurology . 2022;99(12):e1227-e1238. doi:10.1212/WNL.0000000000200889 Background and Objectives: Few data are available regarding the use of anesthetic infusions for refractory status epilepticus (RSE) in children and neonates, and ketamine use is increasing despite limited data. We aimed to describe the impact of ketamine for RSE in children and neonates. Methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study of consecutive patients admitted to the intensive care units of a quaternary care children’s hospital treated with ketamine infusion for RSE. Results: Sixty-nine patients were treated with a ketamine infusion for RSE. The median age at onset of RSE was 0.7 years (interquartile range 0.15-7.2), and the cohort included 13 (19%) neonates. Three patients (4%) had adverse events requiring intervention during or within 12 hours of ketamine administration, including hypertension in 2 patients and delirium in 1 patient. Ketamine infusion was followed by seizure termination in 32 patients (46%), seizure reduction in 19 patients (28%), and no change in 18 patients (26%). Discussion: Ketamine administration was associated with few adverse events, and seizures often terminated or improved after ketamine administration. Further data are needed comparing first-line and subsequent anesthetic medications for treatment of pediatric and neonatal RSE.

Evaluating salvage electroconvulsive therapy for the treatment of prolonged super refractory status epilepticus: A case series

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Clinicians have treated super refractory status epilepticus (SRSE) with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT); however, data supporting the practice are scant and lack rigorous evaluation of continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) changes related to therapy. This study aims to describe a series of patients with SRSE treated at our institution with ECT and characterize cEEG changes using a blinded review process.

METHODS

We performed a single-center retrospective study of consecutive patients admitted for SRSE and treated with ECT from January 2014 to December 2022. Our primary outcome was the resolution of SRSE. Secondary outcomes included changes in ictal-interictal EEG patterns, anesthetic burden, treatment-associated adverse events, and changes in clinical examination. cEEG was reviewed pre- and post-ECT by blinded epileptologists.

RESULTS

Ten patients underwent treatment with ECT across 11 admissions (8 female, median age 57 years). At the time of ECT initiation, nine patients had ongoing SRSE while two had highly ictal patterns and persistent encephalopathy following anesthetic wean, consistent with late-stage SRSE. Super-refractory status epilepticus resolution occurred with a median time to cessation of 4 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 3-9 days) following ECT initiation. Background continuity improved in five patients and periodic discharge frequency decreased in six. There was a decrease in anesthetic use following the completion of ECT and an improvement in neurological exams. There were no associated adverse events.

DISCUSSION

In our cohort, ECT was associated with improvement of ictal-interictal patterns on EEG, and resolution of SRSE, and was not associated with serious adverse events. Further controlled studies are needed.

Early timing of anesthesia in status epilepticus is associated with complete recovery: A 7-year retrospective two-center study

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken to investigate the efficacy, tolerability, and outcome of different timing of anesthesia in adult patients with status epilepticus (SE).

METHODS

Patients with anesthesia for SE from 2015 to 2021 at two Swiss academic medical centers were categorized as anesthetized as recommended third-line treatment, earlier (as first- or second-line treatment), and delayed (later as third-line treatment). Associations between timing of anesthesia and in-hospital outcomes were estimated by logistic regression.

RESULTS

Of 762 patients, 246 received anesthesia; 21% were anesthetized as recommended, 55% earlier, and 24% delayed. Propofol was preferably used for earlier (86% vs. 55.5% for recommended/delayed anesthesia) and midazolam for later anesthesia (17.2% vs. 15.9% for earlier anesthesia). Earlier anesthesia was statistically significantly associated with fewer infections (17% vs. 32.7%), shorter median SE duration (.5 vs. 1.5 days), and more returns to premorbid neurologic function (52.9% vs. 35.5%). Multivariable analyses revealed decreasing odds for return to premorbid function with every additional nonanesthetic antiseizure medication given prior to anesthesia (odds ratio [OR] = .71, 95% confidence interval [CI] = .53-.94) independent of confounders. Subgroup analyses revealed decreased odds for return to premorbid function with increasing delay of anesthesia independent of the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS; STESS = 1-2: OR = .45, 95% CI = .27-.74; STESS > 2: OR = .53, 95% CI = .34-.85), especially in patients without potentially fatal etiology (OR = .5, 95% CI = .35-.73) and in patients experiencing motor symptoms (OR = .67, 95% CI = .48-.93).

SIGNIFICANCE

In this SE cohort, anesthetics were administered as recommended third-line therapy in only every fifth patient and earlier in every second. Increasing delay of anesthesia was associated with decreased odds for return to premorbid function, especially in patients with motor symptoms and no potentially fatal etiology.

A practical approach to in-hospital management of new-onset refractory status epilepticus/febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome

New-onset refractory status epilepticus (NORSE) is "a clinical presentation, not a specific diagnosis, in a patient without active epilepsy or other preexisting relevant neurological disorder, with new onset of refractory status epilepticus without a clear acute or active structural, toxic, or metabolic cause." Febrile infection related epilepsy syndrome (FIRES) is "a subcategory of NORSE that requires a prior febrile infection, with fever starting between 2 weeks and 24 h before the onset of refractory status epilepticus, with or without fever at the onset of status epilepticus." These apply to all ages. Extensive testing of blood and CSF for infectious, rheumatologic, and metabolic conditions, neuroimaging, EEG, autoimmune/paraneoplastic antibody evaluations, malignancy screen, genetic testing, and CSF metagenomics may reveal the etiology in some patients, while a significant proportion of patients' disease remains unexplained, known as NORSE of unknown etiology or cryptogenic NORSE. Seizures are refractory and usually super-refractory (i.e., persist despite 24 h of anesthesia), requiring a prolonged intensive care unit stay, often (but not always) with fair to poor outcomes. Management of seizures in the initial 24-48 h should be like any case of refractory status epilepticus. However, based on the published consensus recommendations, the first-line immunotherapy should begin within 72 h using steroids, intravenous immunoglobulins, or plasmapheresis. If there is no improvement, the ketogenic diet and second-line immunotherapy should start within seven days. Rituximab is recommended as the second-line treatment if there is a strong suggestion or proof of an antibody-mediated disease, while anakinra or tocilizumab are recommended for cryptogenic cases. Intensive motor and cognitive rehab are usually necessary after a prolonged hospital stay. Many patients will have pharmacoresistant epilepsy at discharge, and some may need continued immunologic treatments and an epilepsy surgery evaluation. Extensive research is in progress now via multinational consortia relating to the specific type(s) of inflammation involved, whether age and prior febrile illness affect this, and whether measuring and following serum and/or CSF cytokines can help determine the best treatment.

Association Between Induced Burst Suppression and Clinical Outcomes in Patients With Refractory Status Epilepticus: A 9-Year Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To investigate the frequency of induced EEG burst suppression pattern during continuous IV anesthesia (IVAD) and associated outcomes in adult patients treated for refractory status epilepticus (RSE).

METHODS

Patients with RSE treated with anesthetics at a Swiss academic care center from 2011 to 2019 were included. Clinical data and semiquantitative EEG analyses were assessed. Burst suppression was categorized as incomplete burst suppression (with ≥20% and <50% suppression proportion) or complete burst suppression (with ≥50% suppression proportion). The frequency of induced burst suppression and association of burst suppression with outcomes (persistent seizure termination, in-hospital survival, and return to premorbid neurologic function) were the endpoints.

RESULTS

We identified 147 patients with RSE treated with IVAD. Among 102 patients without cerebral anoxia, incomplete burst suppression was achieved in 14 (14%) with a median of 23 hours (interquartile range [IQR] 1-29) and complete burst suppression was achieved in 21 (21%) with a median of 51 hours (IQR 16-104). Age, Charlson comorbidity index, RSE with motor symptoms, the Status Epilepticus Severity Score and arterial hypotension requiring vasopressors were identified as potential confounders in univariable comparisons between patients with and without any burst suppression. Multivariable analyses revealed no associations between any burst suppression and the predefined endpoints. However, among 45 patients with cerebral anoxia, induced burst suppression was associated with persistent seizure termination (72% without vs 29% with burst suppression, p = 0.004) and survival (50% vs 14% p = 0.005).

DISCUSSION

In adult patients with RSE treated with IVAD, burst suppression with ≥50% suppression proportion was achieved in every fifth patient and not associated with persistent seizure termination, in-hospital survival, or return to premorbid neurologic function.

Comparing Patients With Isolated Seizures and Status Epilepticus in Intensive Care Units: An Observational Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the frequency of status epilepticus (SE) among seizing critically ill adult patients and to determine clinical differences between patients with isolated seizures and patients with SE in the intensive care unit (ICU).

METHODS

From 2015 to 2020, all consecutive adult ICU patients at a Swiss tertiary care center with isolated seizures or SE as reported by intensivists and/or consulting neurologists were identified by screening of all digital medical, ICU, and EEG records. Patients aged <18 years and patients with myoclonus due to hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy but without seizures on EEG were excluded. The frequency of isolated seizures, SE, and clinical characteristics at seizure onset associated with SE were the primary outcomes. Uni- and multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify associations with the emergence of SE.

RESULTS

Among 404 patients with seizures, 51% had SE. Compared with patients with isolated seizures, patients with SE had a lower median Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (3 vs 5, p < 0.001), fewer fatal etiologies (43.6% vs 80.5%, p < 0.001), higher median Glasgow coma scores (7 vs 5, p < 0.001), fever more frequently (27.5% vs 7.5%, p < 0.001), shorter median ICU and hospital stay (ICU: 4 vs 5 days, p = 0.039; hospital stay: 13 vs 15 days, p = 0.045), and recovered to premorbid function more often (36.8% vs 17%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analyses revealed decreased odds ratios (ORs) for SE with increasing CCI (OR 0.91, 95% CI 0.83-0.99), fatal etiology (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.08-0.29), and epilepsy (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.16-0.63). Systemic inflammation was an additional association with SE after excluding patients with seizures as the reason for ICU admission (ORfor CRP 1.01, 95% CI 1.00-1.01; ORfor fever 7.35, 95% CI 2.84-19.0). Although fatal etiologies and increasing CCI remained associated with low odds for SE after excluding anesthetized patients and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy, inflammation remained associated in all subgroups except patients with epilepsy.

DISCUSSION

Among all ICU patients with seizures, SE emerged frequently and seen in every second patient. Besides the unexpected low odds for SE with higher CCI, fatal etiology, and epilepsy, the association of inflammation with SE in the critically ill without epilepsy represents a potential treatment target and deserves further attention.

Status Epilepticus in Older Adults: Diagnostic and Treatment Considerations

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the leading life-threatening neurological emergencies in the elderly population, with significant morbidity and mortality. SE presents unique diagnostic and therapeutic challenges in the older population given overlap with other causes of encephalopathy, complicating diagnosis, and the common occurrence of multiple comorbid diseases complicates treatment. First-line therapy involves the use of rescue benzodiazepine in the form of intravenous lorazepam or diazepam, intramuscular or intranasal midazolam and rectal diazepam. Second-line therapies include parenteral levetiracetam, fosphenytoin, valproate and lacosamide, and underlying comorbidities guide the choice of appropriate medication, while third-line therapies may be influenced by the patient's code status as well as the cause and type of SE. The standard of care for convulsive SE is treatment with an intravenous anesthetic, including midazolam, propofol, ketamine and pentobarbital. There is currently limited evidence guiding appropriate therapy in patients failing third-line therapies. Adjunctive strategies may include immunomodulatory treatments, non-pharmacological strategies such as ketogenic diet, neuromodulation therapies and surgery in select cases. Surrogate decision makers should be updated early and often in refractory episodes of SE and informed of the high morbidity and mortality associated with the disease as well as the high probability of subsequent epilepsy among survivors.

Balancing the risks and benefits of anesthetics in status epilepticus

PURPOSE

According to international guidelines, status epilepticus refractory to first- and second-line antiseizure medication should be treated with anesthetics. Therefore, continuously delivered intravenous midazolam, propofol, or barbiturates are recommended as third-line therapy. While electroencephalographically (EEG)-controlled titration of anesthetics to seizure termination or to the emergence of an EEG burst-suppression pattern makes sense, evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of such third-line treatment is limited and concerns regarding the risks of anesthesia remain. The lack of treatment alternatives and persistent international discord reflecting contradictory results from some studies leave clinicians on their own when deciding to escalate treatment. In this conference-accompanying narrative review, we highlight the challenges of EEG-monitored third-line treatment and discuss recent studies that examined earlier administration of anesthetics.

RESULTS

Based on the literature, maintaining continuous burst suppression is difficult despite the constant administration of anesthetics, and the evidence for burst suppression as an adequate surrogate target is limited by methodological shortcomings as acknowledged by international guidelines. In our Swiss cohort including 102 patients with refractory status epilepticus, burst suppression as defined by the American Clinical Neurophysiology Society's Critical Care EEG Terminology 2021 was established in only 21%. Besides case reports suggesting that rapid but short-termed anesthesia can be sufficient to permanently stop seizures, a study including 205 patients revealed that anesthesia as second-line treatment was associated with a shorter median duration of status epilepticus (0.5 versus 12.5 days, p < 0.001), median ICU (2 versus 5.5 days, p < 0.001) and hospital stay (8 versus 17 days, p < 0.001) with equal rates of complications when compared to anesthesia as third-line treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent investigations have led to important findings and new insights regarding the use of anesthetics in refractory status epilepticus. However, numerous methodological limitations and remaining questions need to be considered when it comes to the translation into clinical practice, and, in consequence, call for prospective randomized studies. This paper was presented at the 8th London-Innsbruck Colloquium on Status Epilepticus and Acute Seizures held in September 2022.

Constant rate infusion of diazepam or propofol for the management of canine cluster seizures or status epilepticus

INTRODUCTION

Cluster seizures (CS) and status epilepticus (SE) in dogs are severe neurological emergencies that require immediate treatment. Practical guidelines call for constant rate infusion (CRI) of benzodiazepines or propofol (PPF) in patients with seizures not responding to first-line treatment, but to date only few studies have investigated the use of CRI in dogs with epilepsy.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective clinical study.

METHODS

Dogs that received CRI of diazepam (DZP) or PPF for antiepileptic treatment during hospitalization at the Veterinary Teaching Hospital of the University of Turin for CS or SE between September 2016 and December 2019 were eligible for inclusion. Favorable outcome was defined as cessation of clinically visible seizure activity within few minutes from the initiation of the CRI, no seizure recurrence within 24 h after discontinuation of CRI through to hospital discharge, and clinical recovery. Poor outcome was defined as recurrence of seizure activity despite treatment or death in hospital because of recurrent seizures, catastrophic consequences of prolonged seizures or no return to an acceptable neurological and clinical baseline, despite apparent control of seizure activity. Comparisons between the number of patients with favorable outcome and those with poor outcome in relation to type of CRI, seizure etiology, reason for presentation (CS or SE), sex, previous AED therapy and dose of PPF CRI were carried out.

RESULTS

A total of 37 dogs, with 50 instances of hospitalization and CRI administered for CS or SE were included in the study. CRI of diazepam (DZP) or PPF was administered in 29/50 (58%) and in 21/50 (42%) instances of hospitalization, respectively. Idiopathic epilepsy was diagnosed in 21/37 (57%), (13/21 tier I and 8/21 tier II); structural epilepsy was diagnosed in 6/37 (16%) of which 4/6 confirmed and 2/6 suspected. A metabolic or toxic cause of seizure activity was recorded in 7/37 (19%). A total of 38/50 (76%) hospitalizations were noted for CS and 12/50 (24%) for SE. In 30/50 (60%) instances of hospitalization, the patient responded well to CRI with cessation of seizure activity, no recurrence in the 24 h after discontinuation of CRI through to hospital discharge, whereas a poor outcome was recorded for 20/50 (40%) cases (DZP CRI in 12/50 and PPF CRI in 8/50). Comparison between the number of patients with favorable outcome and those with poor outcome in relation to type of CRI, seizure etiology, reason for presentation (CS or SE), sex and previous AED therapy was carried out but no statistically significant differences were found.

CONCLUSIONS

The present study is the first to document administration of CRI of DZP or PPF in a large sample of dogs with epilepsy. The medications appeared to be tolerated without major side effects and helped control seizure activity in most patients regardless of seizure etiology. Further studies are needed to evaluate the effects of CRI duration on outcome and complications.

Therapeutically induced EEG burst-suppression pattern to treat refractory status epilepticus—what is the evidence?

Current guidelines advocate to treat refractory status epilepticus (RSE) with continuously administered anesthetics to induce an artificial coma if first- and second-line antiseizure drugs have failed to stop seizure activity. A common surrogate for monitoring the depth of the artificial coma is the appearance of a burst-suppression pattern (BS) in the EEG. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the origin and neurophysiology of the BS phenomenon as well as the evidence from the literature for the presumed benefit of BS as therapy in adult patients with RSE.

Intravenous ganaxolone for the treatment of refractory status epilepticus: Results from an open-label, dose-finding, phase 2 trial

OBJECTIVE

Patients with refractory status epilepticus (RSE) have failed treatment with benzodiazepines and ≥1 second-line intravenous (IV) antiseizure medication (ASM). Guidelines recommend IV anesthesia when second-line ASMs have failed, but potential harms can outweigh the benefits. Novel treatments are needed to stop and durably control RSE without escalation to IV anesthetics. Ganaxolone is an investigational neuroactive steroid in development for RSE treatment. This study's objective was to determine the appropriate dosing for IV ganaxolone in RSE and obtain a preliminary assessment of efficacy and safety.

METHODS

This was an open-label, phase 2 trial conducted from February 19, 2018 to September 18, 2019, at three sites in the United States. Patients were aged ≥12 years, had convulsive or nonconvulsive SE, and failed to respond to ≥1 second-line IV ASM. Twenty-one patients were screened; 17 were enrolled. Patients received IV ganaxolone added to standard-of-care ASMs. Ganaxolone infusion was initiated as an IV bolus (over 3 min) with continuous infusion of decreasing infusion rates for 48-96 h followed by an 18-h taper. There were three ganaxolone dosing cohorts: low, 500 mg/day; medium, 650 mg/day; and high, 713 mg/day. The primary end point was the number of patients not requiring escalation to IV anesthetic treatment within 24 h of ganaxolone initiation.

RESULTS

Most of the 17 enrolled patients (65%) had nonconvulsive SE, and had failed a median of three prior ASMs, including first-line benzodiazepine and second-line IV ASM therapy. Median time to SE cessation following ganaxolone initiation was 5 min. No patient required escalation to third-line IV anesthetics during the 24-h period following ganaxolone initiation. Two treatment-related serious adverse events (sedation) were reported. Of the three deaths, none was considered related to ganaxolone; all occurred 9-22 days after completing ganaxolone.

SIGNIFICANCE

IV ganaxolone achieved rapid and durable seizure control in patients with RSE, and showed acceptable safety and tolerability.

Reponse of second-line treatment in focal status epilepticus: A tertiary hospital experience

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the response to various antiseizure medications (ASMs) in the treatment of focal status epilepticus (SE) in the established phase, and the effect of administering several ASMs prior to sedation.

METHODS

All SE cases in patients aged > 16 years treated with non-BZDs ASMs were prospectively collected in our centre from February 2011 to April 2019. In total, 281 episodes were analysed.

RESULTS

Median age at SE onset was 65.1 years; 47 % were focal motor and 53 % focal non-motor episodes. SE cessation was achieved in 79 % episodes with second-line drugs, whereas a third line (anesthetics) was required in 47 episodes. SE cessation was achieved in only 27 % with the first ASM, 48 % with the second, and 51 % with the third. Prompt resolution of the SE episode with a first or second ASM was associated with a better outcome than episodes requiring a larger number of drugs (p = 0.024). The first option in our sample was levetiracetam in 70 % of cases. Among the total of non-responding SE cases treated with levetiracetam as the first ASM option, 107 were subsequently given lacosamide (seizure cessation in 53.3 %) and 34 valproic acid (seizure cessation in 29.4 %) (p = 0.015).

CONCLUSION

Our findings further support the notion that early termination of SE with a first or second ASM confers a better functional outcome. The large difference in response between the first ASM and consecutive ones suggests that the sum of different ASMs might be the key to resolving focal SE.

Conocimiento de los residentes de especialidades médico-quirúrgicas en Colombia acerca del estado epiléptico

 Introducción: el estado epiléptico es una emergencia con serias implicaciones a nivel social y económico, cuando no se maneja de manera adecuada puede llevar a la muerte. Debe abordarse por el primer especialista que tenga contacto con el paciente. En Colombia no hay estudios acerca de la adherencia a guías de práctica clínica. Objetivo: evaluar cuál es el conocimiento acerca del estado epiléptico en residentes de especialidades médico quirúrgicas en Colombia. Métodos: estudio de corte transversal descriptivo. Se aplicó una encuesta por medio de formulario google, diseñada con base en las guías de práctica clínica rutinaria para el manejo de esta patología. Resultados: respondieron la encuesta 76 residentes de neurología, medicina interna, medicina de urgencias y cuidado crítico, la edad más frecuente fue 26 a 31 años, con una relación hombre mujer de 46/54%. Discusión: las preguntas concernientes a las definiciones operativas y a los tiempos de acción fueron las que tuvieron una mejor consistencia al responderse, hay una importante falencia en la selección y uso de medicamentos anticrisis en el contexto del estado epiléptico, por lo que es importante fortalecer la educación médica en éstos aspectos académicos.

IGNITE Status Epilepticus Survey: A Nationwide Interrogation about the Current Management of Status Epilepticus in Germany

We aimed to evaluate the current management of status epilepticus (SE) in intensive care units (ICUs) in Germany, depending on the different hospital levels of care and the ICU specialty. We performed a nationwide web-based anonymized survey, including all German ICUs registered with the German Society for Neurointensive and Emergency Care (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurointensiv- und Notfallmedizin; DGNI). The response rate was 83/232 (36%). Continuous EEG monitoring (cEEG) was available in 86% of ICUs. Regular written cEEG reports were obtained in only 50%. Drug management was homogeneous with a general consensus regarding substance order: benzodiazepines—anticonvulsants—sedatives. Thereunder first choice substances were lorazepam (90%), levetiracetam (91%), and propofol (73%). Data suggest that network structures for super-refractory SE are not permeable, as 75% did not transfer SE patients. Our survey provides “real world data” concerning the current management of SE in Germany. Uniform standards in the implementation of cEEG could help further improve the overall quality. Initial therapy management is standardized. For super-refractory SE, a concentration of highly specialized centers establishing network structures analogous to neurovascular diseases seems desirable to apply rescue therapies with low evidence carefully, ideally collecting data on this rare condition in registries and clinical trials.

Hippocampal injury and learning deficits following non-convulsive status epilepticus in periadolescent rats

The effects of non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) on the developing brain remain largely elusive. Here we investigated potential hippocampal injury and learning deficits following one or two episodes of NCSE in periadolescent rats. Non-convulsive status epilepticus was induced with subconvulsive doses of intrahippocampal kainic acid (KA) under continuous EEG monitoring in postnatal day 43 (P43) rats. The RKA group (repeated KA) received intrahippocampal KA at P43 and P44, the SKA group (single KA injection) received KA at P43 and an intrahippocampal saline injection at P44. Controls were sham-treated with saline. The modified two-way active avoidance (MAAV) test was conducted between P45 and P52 to assess learning of context-cued and tone-signaled electrical foot-shock avoidance. Histological analyses were performed at P52 to assess hippocampal neuronal densities, as well as potential reactive astrocytosis and synaptic dysfunction with GFAP (glial fibrillary acidic protein) and synaptophysin (Syp) staining, respectively. Kainic acid injections resulted in electroclinical seizures characterized by behavioral arrest, oromotor automatisms and salivation, without tonic-clonic activity. Compared to controls, both the SKA and RKA groups had lower rates of tone-signaled shock avoidance (p < 0.05). In contextual testing, SKA rats were comparable to controls (p > 0.05), but the RKA group had learning deficits (p < 0.05). Hippocampal neuronal densities were comparable in all groups. Compared to controls, both the SKA and RKA groups had higher hippocampal GFAP levels (p < 0.05). The RKA group also had lower hippocampal Syp levels compared to the SKA and control groups (p < 0.05), which were comparable (p > 0.05). We show that hippocampal NCSE in periadolescent rats results in a seizure burden-dependent hippocampal injury accompanied by cognitive deficits. Our data suggest that the diagnosis and treatment of NCSE should be prompt.

Parental perception of FIRES outcomes, emotional states, and social media usage

Objective

To investigate parental perception of FIRES outcomes, assess emotional states and related social media usage.

Methods

A survey‐based study of parents of children with FIRES participating in a FIRES‐specific Facebook group was performed. The survey collected information on medical aspects of their child's course in the acute, subacute, and chronic periods, emotional states, and social media usage. Child outcome was assessed utilizing the pediatric extended Glasgow outcome scale (GOS‐E). Parental emotional states were assessed utilizing the Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS). Descriptive statistics were performed. Associations were described using the Spearman rank correlation. Open‐ended questions were included. Thematic analysis was performed.

Results

Twenty‐nine surveys were analyzed. All children were in the chronic phase at time of survey response, except for two who died. Mothers answered 22 surveys, and fathers answered seven. Median age at FIRES presentation was 5.6 years [IQR 4.2‐8.95], with a median number of 3 seizures per week [IQR 0‐10, range 0‐50], 4 daily anti‐seizure medicines [IQR 3‐5], and chronic GOS‐E of 6 [IQR 2‐8 range 2‐8]. Most parents reported none to mild levels of depression, anxiety, and stress. Higher seizure burden positively correlated with parental depression symptoms (r = .41 (95% CI 0.01, 0.70), P = .045). Most parents found social media helpful with coping and 96% desired FIRES research advertised. Twenty‐five parents shared their recommendations to fellow parents and the medical team in an open‐ended format. Themes included support, expertise, and medical advice.

Significance

Despite their children's significantly impaired functional outcome after FIRES and high rates of medically refractory epilepsy, the cohort demonstrated remarkable emotional resilience. They perceive social media as beneficial, are interested in social media‐advertised research, and share valuable advice. Social media may serve as an introductory platform to enhance the physician‐scientist‐parent/patient relationship.

Safety and Efficacy of Coma Induction Following First-Line Treatment in Status Epilepticus: A 2-Center Study

OBJECTIVE

To explore the safety and efficacy of artificial coma induction to treat status epilepticus (SE) immediately after first-line antiseizure treatment instead of following the recommended approach of first using second-line drugs.

METHODS

Clinical and electrophysiologic data of all adult patients treated for SE from 2017 to 2018 in the Swiss academic medical care centers from Basel and Geneva were retrospectively assessed. Primary outcomes were return to premorbid neurologic function and in-hospital death. Secondary outcomes were the emergence of complications during SE, duration of SE, and intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stays.

RESULTS

Of 230 patients, 205 received treatment escalation after first-line medication. Of those, 27.3% were directly treated with artificial coma and 72.7% with second-line nonanesthetic antiseizure drugs. Of the latter, 16.6% were subsequently put on artificial coma after failure of second-line treatment. Multivariable analyses revealed increasing odds for coma induction after first-line treatment with younger age, the presence of convulsions, and an increased SE severity as quantified by the Status Epilepticus Severity Score (STESS). While outcomes and complications did not differ compared to patients with treatment escalation according to the guidelines, coma induction after first-line treatment was associated with shorter SE duration and ICU and hospital stays.

CONCLUSIONS

Early induction of artificial coma is performed in more than every fourth patient and especially in younger patients presenting with convulsions and more severe SE. Our data demonstrate that this aggressive treatment escalation was not associated with an increase in complications but with shorter duration of SE and ICU and hospital stays.

CLASSIFICATION OF EVIDENCE

This study provides Class III evidence that early induction of artificial coma after unsuccessful first-line treatment for SE is associated with shorter duration of SE and ICU and hospital stays compared to the use of a second-line nonanesthetic antiseizure drug instead of or before anesthetics, without an associated increase in complications.

Early Neurologic Recovery, Practice Pattern Variation, and the Risk of Endotracheal Intubation Following Established Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the association between early neurologic recovery, practice pattern variation, and endotracheal intubation during established status epilepticus, we performed a secondary analysis within the cohort of patients enrolled in the Established Status Epilepticus Treatment Trial (ESETT).

METHODS

We evaluated factors associated with the endpoint of endotracheal intubation occurring within 120 minutes of ESETT study drug initiation. We defined a blocked, stepwise multivariate regression, examining 4 phases during status epilepticus management: (1) baseline characteristics, (2) acute treatment, (3) 20-minute neurologic recovery, and (4) 60-minute recovery, including seizure cessation and improving responsiveness.

RESULTS

Of 478 patients, 117 (24.5%) were intubated within 120 minutes. Among high-enrolling sites, intubation rates ranged from 4% to 32% at pediatric sites and 19% to 39% at adult sites. Baseline characteristics, including seizure precipitant, benzodiazepine dosing, and admission vital signs, provided limited discrimination for predicting intubation (area under the curve [AUC] 0.63). However, treatment at sites with an intubation rate in the highest (vs lowest) quartile strongly predicted endotracheal intubation independently of other treatment variables (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 8.12, 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.08-21.4, model AUC 0.70). Site-specific variation was the factor most strongly associated with endotracheal intubation after adjustment for 20-minute (aOR 23.4, 95% CI 6.99-78.3, model AUC 0.88) and 60-minute (aOR 14.7, 95% CI 3.20-67.5, model AUC 0.98) neurologic recovery.

CONCLUSIONS

Endotracheal intubation after established status epilepticus is strongly associated with site-specific practice pattern variation, independently of baseline characteristics, and early neurologic recovery and should not alone serve as a clinical trial endpoint in established status epilepticus.

TRIAL REGISTRATION INFORMATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01960075.

Pharmacotherapy for Nonconvulsive Seizures and Nonconvulsive Status Epilepticus

Most seizures in critically ill patients are nonconvulsive. A significant number of neurological and medical conditions can be complicated by nonconvulsive seizures (NCSs) and nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE), with brain infections, hemorrhages, global hypoxia, sepsis, and recent neurosurgery being the most prominent etiologies. Prolonged NCSs and NCSE can lead to adverse neurological outcomes. Early recognition requires a high degree of suspicion and rapid and appropriate duration of continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) monitoring. Although high quality research evaluating treatment with antiseizure medications and long-term outcome is still lacking, it is probable that expeditious pharmacological management of NCSs and NCSE may prevent refractoriness and further neurological injury. There is limited evidence on pharmacotherapy for NCSs and NCSE, although a few clinical trials encompassing both convulsive and NCSE have demonstrated similar efficacy of different intravenous (IV) antiseizure medications (ASMs), including levetiracetam, valproate, lacosamide and fosphenytoin. The choice of specific ASMs lies on tolerability and safety since critically ill patients frequently have impaired renal and/or hepatic function as well as hematological/hemodynamic lability. Treatment frequently requires more than one ASM and occasionally escalation to IV anesthetic drugs. When multiple ASMs are required, combining different mechanisms of action should be considered. There are several enteral ASMs that could be used when IV ASM options have been exhausted. Refractory NCSE is not uncommon, and its treatment requires a very judicious selection of ASMs aiming at reducing seizure burden along with management of the underlying condition.

[S2k guidelines: status epilepticus in adulthood : Guidelines of the German Society for Neurology]

This S2k guideline on diagnosis and treatment of status epilepticus (SE) in adults is based on the last published version from 2021. New definitions and evidence were included in the guideline and the clinical pathway. A seizures lasting longer than 5 minutes (or ≥ 2 seizures over more than 5 mins without intermittend recovery to the preictal neurological state. Initial diagnosis should include a cCT or, if possible, an MRI. The EEG is highly relevant for diagnosis and treatment-monitoring of non-convulsive SE and for the exclusion or diagnosis of psychogenic non-epileptic seizures. As the increasing evidence supports the relevance of inflammatory comorbidities (e.g. pneumonia) related clinical chemistry should be obtained and repeated over the course of a SE treatment, and antibiotic therapy initiated if indicated.Treatment is applied on four levels: 1. Initial SE: An adequate dose of benzodiazepine is given i.v., i.m., or i.n.; 2. Benzodiazepine-refractory SE: I.v. drugs of 1st choice are levetiracetam or valproate; 3. Refractory SE (RSE) or 4. Super-refractory SE (SRSE): I.v. propofol or midazolam alone or in combination or thiopental in anaesthetic doses are given. In focal non-convulsive RSE the induction of a therapeutic coma depends on the circumstances and is not mandatory. In SRSE the ketogenic diet should be given. I.v. ketamine or inhalative isoflorane can be considered. In selected cased electroconvulsive therapy or, if a resectable epileptogenic zone can be defined epilepsy surgery can be applied. I.v. allopregnanolone or systemic hypothermia should not be used.

Not all patients with convulsive status epilepticus intubated in pre-hospital settings meet the criteria for refractory status epilepticus

INTRODUCTION

Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) for generalized convulsive status epilepticus (GCSE) are a heterogeneous population. Our objective was to evaluate the number of patients who fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for refractory GCSE and describe their initial management and prognosis.

METHODS

This multicenter retrospective study was conducted in four French ICUs in Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital in Paris and in the Hospital of Jossigny. Mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU for GCSE between, January 1, 2014, and, December 31, 2016, were included. Patients with anoxia and traumatic brain injury were excluded. Their pre-hospital and ICU medical records were reviewed. The collected data included pre-hospital clinical status, pre-hospital antiepileptic treatment, reason for mechanical ventilation, duration of general anesthesia, and prognosis in the ICU. A retrospective initial diagnosis based on the findings of the analysis of the clinical records was attributed to each patient.

RESULTS

Among the 98 patients included, 88.8% (n = 87/98) fulfilled the diagnostic criteria for GCSE; of these cases, 16.1% (n = 14/87) were refractory. Eleven percent of the patients did not fulfill the criteria for GCSE at the time of initial management (retrospective diagnosis of single convulsive seizure, repetitive convulsive seizures, or psychogenic non-epileptic seizures). Most patients were intubated for coma (58.9%, n = 56/95, missing data: n = 3). In the ICU, the median [Q1-Q3] duration of general anesthesia before weaning was 12.3 h (5.0-18.0 h); 7% of the patients had a relapse of status epilepticus, and 2% died in the ICU.

CONCLUSION

Among the cases of confirmed GCSE in the mechanically ventilated patients admitted to the ICU, 16.1% were refractory, with an overall good prognosis. A significant proportion of patients did not fulfill the diagnostic criteria for refractory GCSE.

Update on the management of status epilepticus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Randomized controlled trials investigating the initial pharmacological treatment of status epilepticus have been recently published. Furthermore, status epilepticus arising in comatose survivors after cardiac arrest has received increasing attention in the last years. This review offers an updated assessment of status epilepticus treatment in these different scenarios.

RECENT FINDINGS

Initial benzodiazepines underdosing is common and correlates with development of status epilepticus refractoriness. The recently published ESETT trial provides high-level evidence regarding the equivalence of fosphenytoin, valproate, and levetiracetam as a second-line option. Myoclonus or epileptiform transients on electroencephalography occur in up to 1/3 of patients surviving a cardiac arrest. Contrary to previous assumptions regarding an almost invariable association with death, at least 1/10 of them may awaken with reasonably good prognosis, if treated. Multimodal prognostication including clinical examination, EEG, somatosensory evoked potentials, biochemical markers, and neuroimaging help identifying patients with a chance to recover consciousness, in whom a trial with antimyoclonic compounds and at times general anesthetics is indicated.

SUMMARY

There is a continuous, albeit relatively slow progress in knowledge regarding different aspect of status epilepticus; recent findings refine some treatment strategies and help improving patients' outcomes. Further high-quality studies are clearly needed to further improve the management of these patients, especially those with severe, refractory status epilepticus forms.

Antiepileptic Drug Therapy for Status Epilepticus

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most serious neurologic emergencies. SE is a condition that encompasses a broad range of semiologic subtypes and heterogeneous etiologies. The treatment of SE primarily involves the management of the underlying etiology and the use of antiepileptic drug therapy to rapidly terminate seizure activities. The Drug Committee of the Korean Epilepsy Society performed a review of existing guidelines and literature with the aim of providing practical recommendations for antiepileptic drug therapy. This article is one of a series of review articles by the Drug Committee and it summarizes staged antiepileptic drug therapy for SE. While evidence of good quality supports the use of benzodiazepines as the first-line treatment of SE, such evidence informing the administration of second- or third-line treatments is lacking; hence, the recommendations presented herein concerning the treatment of established and refractory SE are based on case series and expert opinions. The choice of antiepileptic drugs in each stage should consider the characteristics and circumstances of each patient, as well as their estimated benefit and risk to them. In tandem with the antiepileptic drug therapy, careful searching for and treatment of the underlying etiology are required.

A Theoretical Paradigm for Evaluating Risk-Benefit of Status Epilepticus Treatment

Aggressive treatment of status epilepticus with anesthetic drugs can provide rapid seizure control, but it might lead to serious medical complications and worse outcomes. Using a decision analysis approach, this concise review provides a framework for individualized decision making about aggressive and nonaggressive treatment in status epilepticus. The authors propose and review the most relevant parameters guiding the risk-benefit analysis of treatment aggressiveness in status epilepticus and present real-world-based case examples to illustrate how these tools could be used at the bedside and serve to guide future research in refractory status epilepticus treatment.

Postinfectious inflammation in cerebrospinal fluid is associated with nonconvulsive seizures in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients

PURPOSE

It was unclear how nonconvulsive seizures (NCS) occurred after subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). The aim of this prospective observational study was to determine the association between cerebrospinal fluid postinfectious inflammation and NCS in patients with SAH.

METHODS

Demographics and parameters were retrieved from pooled data of all SAH patients monitored by continuous electroencephalography (cEEG) in our Stroke-Intensive Care Unit (Stroke-ICU) over six years period. Patients were divided into two groups (NCS group and non-NCS group). According to clinical and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) parameters, a logistic regression model was used to analyze the association between CSF inflammation and NCS.

RESULTS

The data of 143 SAH patients were analyzed (25 patients with NCS and 118 patients with non-NCS). Median age was 53 years (min - max: 19 years - 90 years). 4.8 % SAH patients were accompanied with NCS. Among these 25 NCS patients, only 2 (8%) had complete control of EEG discharges. After confounders correction, logistic regression analysis showed: SAH patients with older age [P = 0.003, OR = 1.193, 95 %CI (1.062-1.341)], intracranial infections [P = 0.000, OR = 171.939, 95 %CI (18.136-1630.064)] and higher increased modified Fisher Scale (mFS) [P = 0.003, OR = 8.884, 95 %CI (2.125-37.148)] were more likely to develop NCS; furthermore, a high level of CSF interleukin-6 (IL-6) was an independent risk factor for NCS [P = 0.000, OR = 1.015, 95 %CI (1.010-1.020)], with a threshold of 164.9 pg/mL (sensitivity = 0.84, specificity = 0.96). Compared with non-NCS patients, NCS patients were more likely to have poor Glasgow outcome scale (GOS) (1-3) at 3 months after discharge (88 %).

CONCLUSIONS

SAH patients with NCS were associated with poor neurological prognosis. With the increase of age and mFS, these patients were more likely to develop NCS. As an intracranial infective mark, a high level of CSF IL-6 was an independent risk factor for NCS. For brain protection of severe brain injury after SAH, we should focus on the increasingly important role of inflammatory response.

Status Epilepticus-Work-Up and Management in Children

Status epilepticus (SE) is one of the most common neurological emergencies in children and has a mortality of 2 to 4%. Admissions for SE are very resource-consuming, especially in refractory and super-refractory SE. An increasing understanding of the pathophysiology of SE leaves room for improving SE treatment protocols, including medication choice and timing. Selecting the most efficacious medications and giving them in a timely manner may improve outcomes. Benzodiazepines are commonly used as first line and they can be used in the prehospital setting, where most SE episodes begin. The diagnostic work-up should start simultaneously to initial treatment, or as soon as possible, to detect potentially treatable causes of SE. Although most etiologies are recognized after the first evaluation, the detection of more unusual causes may become challenging in selected cases. SE is a life-threatening medical emergency in which prompt and efficacious treatment may improve outcomes. We provide a summary of existing evidence to guide clinical decisions regarding the work-up and treatment of SE in pediatric patients.

To Wean or Not to Wean: Machine Learning to the Rescue

[Box: see text]

Markers in Status Epilepticus Prognosis

Status epilepticus (SE) is a neurologic emergency with high morbidity and mortality. The assessment of a patient's prognosis is crucial in making treatment decisions. In this review, we discuss various markers that have been used to prognosticate SE in terms of recurrence, mortality, and functional outcome. These markers include demographic, clinical, electrophysiological, biochemical, and structural data. The heterogeneity of SE etiology and semiology renders development of prognostic markers challenging. Currently, prognostication in SE is limited to a few clinical scores. Future research should integrate clinical, genetic and epigenetic, metabolic, inflammatory, and structural biomarkers into prognostication models to approach "personalized medicine" in prognostication of outcomes after SE.

Ictal-interictal continuum: a review of recent advancements

Continuous electroencephalogram (cEEG) has become an indispensable technique in the management of critically ill patients for early detection and treatment of non-convulsive seizures (NCS) and non-convulsive status epilepticus (NCSE). It has also brought about a renaissance in a wide range of rhythmic and periodic patterns with heterogeneous frequency and morphology. These patterns share the rhythmic and sharp appearances of electrographic seizures, but often lack the necessary frequency, spatiotemporal evolution and clinical accompaniments to meet the definitive criteria for ictal patterns. They may be associated with cerebral metabolic crisis and neuronal injury, therefore not clearly interictal either, but lie along an intervening spectrum referred to as ictal-interictal continuum (IIC). Generally speaking, rhythmic and periodic patterns are categorized as interictal patterns when occurring at a rate of <1Hz, and are categorized as NCS and NCSE when occurring at a rate of >2.5 Hz with spatiotemporal evolution. As such, IIC commonly includes the rhythmic and periodic patterns occurring at a rate of 1–2.5 Hz without spatiotemporal evolution and clinical correlates. Currently there are no evidence-based guidelines on when and if to treat patients with IIC patterns, and particularly how aggressively to treat, presenting a challenging electrophysiological and clinical conundrum. In practice, a diagnostic trial with preferably a non-sedative anti-seizure medication (ASM) can be considered with the end point being both clinical and electrographic improvement. When available and necessary, correlation of IIC with biomarkers of neuronal injury, such as neuronal specific enolase (NSE), neuroimaging, depth electrode recording, cerebral microdialysis and oxygen measurement, can be assessed for the consideration of ASM treatment. Here we review the recent advancements in their clinical significance, risk stratification and treatment algorithm.

Treatment of Refractory Convulsive Status Epilepticus: A Comprehensive Review by the American Epilepsy Society Treatments Committee

Purpose:

Established tonic–clonic status epilepticus (SE) does not stop in one-third of patients when treated with an intravenous (IV) benzodiazepine bolus followed by a loading dose of a second antiseizure medication (ASM). These patients have refractory status epilepticus (RSE) and a high risk of morbidity and death. For patients with convulsive refractory status epilepticus (CRSE), we sought to determine the strength of evidence for 8 parenteral ASMs used as third-line treatment in stopping clinical CRSE.

Methods:

A structured literature search (MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, CINAHL) was performed to identify original studies on the treatment of CRSE in children and adults using IV brivaracetam, ketamine, lacosamide, levetiracetam (LEV), midazolam (MDZ), pentobarbital (PTB; and thiopental), propofol (PRO), and valproic acid (VPA). Adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH), corticosteroids, intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg), magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine were added to determine the effectiveness in treating hard-to-control seizures in special circumstances. Studies were evaluated by predefined criteria and were classified by strength of evidence in stopping clinical CRSE (either as the last ASM added or compared to another ASM) according to the 2017 American Academy of Neurology process.

Results:

No studies exist on the use of ACTH, corticosteroids, or IVIg for the treatment of CRSE. Small series and case reports exist on the use of these agents in the treatment of RSE of suspected immune etiology, severe epileptic encephalopathies, and rare epilepsy syndromes. For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of brivaracetam (level U; 4 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists on the effectiveness of ketamine (level U; 25 class IV studies). For children and adults with CRSE, it is possible that lacosamide is effective at stopping RSE (level C; 2 class III, 14 class IV studies). For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that LEV and VPA are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support the effectiveness of LEV (level U; 2 class IV studies). Magnesium sulfate may be effective in the treatment of eclampsia, but there are only case reports of its use for CRSE. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ and diazepam infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that MDZ infusion and PTB are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support either that MDZ infusion and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study) or that low-dose and high-dose MDZ infusions are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For children and adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that MDZ is effective as the last drug added (level U; 29 class IV studies). For adults with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB and PRO are equally effective (level U; 1 class III study). For adults and children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PTB is effective as the last ASM added (level U; 42 class IV studies). For CRSE, insufficient evidence exists to support that PRO is effective as the last ASM used (level U; 26 class IV studies). No pediatric-only studies exist on the use of PRO for CRSE, and many guidelines do not recommend its use in children aged <16 years. Pyridoxine-dependent and pyridoxine-responsive epilepsies should be considered in children presenting between birth and age 3 years with refractory seizures and no imaging lesion or other acquired cause of seizures. For children with CRSE, insufficient evidence exists that VPA and diazepam infusion are equally effective (level U, 1 class III study). No class I to III studies have been reported in adults treated with VPA for CRSE. In comparison, for children and adults with established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), after an initial benzodiazepine, it is likely that loading doses of LEV 60 mg/kg, VPA 40 mg/kg, and fosphenytoin 20 mg PE/kg are equally effective at stopping SE (level B, 1 class I study).

Conclusions:

Mostly insufficient evidence exists on the efficacy of stopping clinical CRSE using brivaracetam, lacosamide, LEV, valproate, ketamine, MDZ, PTB, and PRO either as the last ASM or compared to others of these drugs. Adrenocorticotropic hormone, IVIg, corticosteroids, magnesium sulfate, and pyridoxine have been used in special situations but have not been studied for CRSE. For the treatment of established convulsive SE (ie, not RSE), LEV, VPA, and fosphenytoin are likely equally effective, but whether this is also true for CRSE is unknown. Triple-masked, randomized controlled trials are needed to compare the effectiveness of parenteral anesthetizing and nonanesthetizing ASMs in the treatment of CRSE.

Therapeutic Options for Patients with Refractory Status Epilepticus in Palliative Settings or with a Limitation of Life-Sustaining Therapies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Refractory status epilepticus (RSE) represents a serious medical condition requiring early and targeted therapy. Given the increasing number of elderly or multimorbid patients with a limitation of life-sustaining therapy (LOT) or within a palliative care setting (PCS), guidelines-oriented therapy escalation options for RSE have to be omitted frequently.

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review sought to summarize the evidence for fourth-line antiseizure drugs (ASDs) and other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options beyond guideline recommendations in patients with RSE to elaborate on possible treatment options for patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, focusing on fourth-line ASDs or other minimally or non-invasive therapeutic options was performed in February and June 2020 using the MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane databases. The search terminology was constructed using the name of the specific ASD or therapy option and the term 'status epilepticus' with the use of Boolean operators, e.g. "(brivaracetam) AND (status epilepticus)". The respective Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and Emtree terms were used, if available.

RESULTS

There is currently no level 1, grade A evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE. The best evidence was found for the use of lacosamide and topiramate (level 3, grade C), followed by brivaracetam, perampanel (each level 4, grade D) and stiripentol, oxcarbazepine and zonisamide (each level 5, grade D). Regarding non-medicinal options, there is little evidence for the use of the ketogenic diet (level 4, grade D) and magnesium sulfate (level 5, grade D) in RSE. The broad use of immunomodulatory or immunosuppressive treatment options in the absence of a presumed autoimmune etiology cannot be recommended; however, if an autoimmune etiology is assumed, steroid pulse, intravenous immunoglobulins and plasma exchange/plasmapheresis should be considered (level 4, grade D). Even if several studies suggested that the use of neurosteroids (level 5, grade D) is beneficial in RSE, the current data situation indicates that there is formal evidence against it.

CONCLUSIONS

RSE in patients undergoing LOT or in a PCS represents a challenge for modern clinicians and epileptologists. The evidence for the use of ASDs in RSE beyond that in current guidelines is low, but several effective and well-tolerated options are available that should be considered in this patient population. More so than in any other population, advance care planning, advance directives, and medical ethical aspects have to be considered carefully before and during therapy.

Dexamethasone as Abortive Treatment for Refractory Seizures or Status Epilepticus in the Inpatient Setting

Refractory seizures or status epilepticus (RS/SE) continues to be a challenge in the inpatient setting. Failure to abort a seizure with antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) may lead to intubation and treatment with general anesthesia exposing patients to complications, extending hospitalization, and increasing the cost of care. Studies have shown a key role of inflammatory mediators in seizure generation and termination. We describe 4 patients with RS/SE that was aborted when dexamethasone was added to conventional AEDs: a 61-year-old female with temporal lobe epilepsy who presented with delirium, nonconvulsive status epilepticus, and oculomyoclonic status; a 56-year-old female with history of traumatic left frontal lobe hemorrhage who developed right face and hand epilepsia partialis continua followed by refractory focal clonic seizures; a 51-year-old male with history of traumatic intracranial hemorrhage who exhibited left-sided epilepsia partialis continua; and a 75-year-old female with history of breast cancer who manifested nonconvulsive status epilepticus and refractory focal clonic seizures. All patients continued experiencing RS/SE despite first- and second-line therapy, and one patient continued to experience RS/SE despite third-line therapy. Failure to abort RS/SE with conventional therapy motivated us to administer intravenous dexamethasone. A 10-mg load was given (except in one patient) followed by 4.0- 5.2 mg q6h. All clinical and electrographic seizures stopped 3-4 days after starting dexamethasone. When dexamethasone was discontinued 1-3 days after seizures stopped, all patients remained seizure-free on 2-3 AEDs. The cessation of RS/SE when dexamethasone was added to conventional antiseizure therapy suggests that inflammatory processes are involved in the pathogenesis of RS/SE.

Causes of Death in Status Epilepticus

OBJECTIVES

To determine the causes of death in patients with status epilepticus. To analyze the relative contributions of seizure etiology, seizure refractoriness, use of mechanical ventilation, anesthetic drugs for seizure control, and medical complications to in-hospital and 90-day mortality, hospital length of stay, and discharge disposition.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort.

SETTING

Single-center neuroscience ICU.

PARTICIPANTS

Patients with status epilepticus were identified by retrospective search of electronic database from January 1, 2011, to December 31, 2016.

INTERVENTIONS

Review of electronic medical records.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Demographics, clinical characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analysis were used to determine whether the use of anesthetic drugs, mechanical ventilation, Status Epilepticus Severity Score, refractoriness of seizures, etiology of seizures, or medical complications were associated with in-hospital, 90-day mortality or discharge disposition. Among 244 patients with status epilepticus (mean age was 64 yr [interquartile range, 42-76], 55% male, median Status Epilepticus Severity Score 3 [interquartile range, 2-4]), 24 received anesthetic drug infusions for seizure control. In-hospital and 90-day mortality rates were 9.2% and 19.2%, respectively. Death was preceded by withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment in 19 patients (86.3%) and cardiac arrest in three (13.7%). Only Status Epilepticus Severity Score was associated with in-hospital and 90-day mortality, whereas the use of anesthetic drugs for seizure control, mechanical ventilation, medical complications, etiology, and refractoriness of seizures were not. Hospital length of stay was longer in patients with medical complications (p = 0.0091), refractory seizures (p = 0.0077), and in those who required anesthetic drugs for seizure control (p = 0.0035). Patients who had refractory seizures were less likely to be discharged home (odds ratio, 0.295; CI, 0.143-0.608; p = 0.0009).

CONCLUSIONS

In this cohort, death primarily resulted from the underlying neurologic disease and withdrawal of life-sustaining treatment and not from our treatment choices. Use of anesthetic drugs, medical complications, and mechanical ventilation were not associated with in-hospital and 90-day mortality.