Overtreatment of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in the Surgical ICU

Development and Validation Nomogram for Predicting the Survival of Patients with Thrombocytopenia in Intensive Care Units

Background

The number of patients with thrombocytopenia (TCP) is relatively high in intensive care units (ICUs). It is therefore necessary to evaluate the prognostic risk of such patients.

Aim

This study investigated the risk factors affecting the survival of patients with TCP in the ICU. Using the findings of this investigation, we developed and validated a risk prediction model.

Methods

We evaluated patients admitted to the ICU who presented with TCP. We used LASSO regression to identify important clinical indicators. Based on these indicators, we developed a prediction model complete with a nomogram for the development cohort set. We then evaluated the mode's accuracy using a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curves, and decision curve analysis (DCA) in a validation cohort.

Results

A total of 141 cases of ICU TCP were included in the sample, of which 47 involved death of the patient. Clinical results were as follows: N (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.86-0.97, P=0.003); TBIL (HR 1.98, 95% CI 1.02-1.99, P=0.048); APACHE II (HR 1.94, 95% CI 1.39, 2.48, P=0.045); WPRN (HR 6.22, 95% CI 2.86-13.53, P<0.001); WTOST (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.21-1.46, P<0.001); and DMV [HR1.87, 95% CI 1.12-2.33]. The prediction model yielded an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.918 (95% CI 0.863-0.974) in the development cohort and 0.926 (95% CI 0.849-0.994) in the validation cohort. Application of the nomogram in the validation cohort gave good discrimination (C-index 0.853, 95% CI 0.810-0.922) and good calibration. DCA indicated that the nomogram was clinically useful.

Conclusion

The individualized nomogram developed through our analysis demonstrated effective prognostic prediction for patients with TCP in ICUs. Use of this prediction metric may reduce TCP-related morbidity and mortality in ICUs.

Analysis of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnostic and management strategies in individuals with inconclusive antibody optical densities

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is an uncommon but serious complication of exposure to heparin. Antibody optical densities (ODs) used to diagnose HIT exceeding 2 are highly suggestive of disease, whereas ODs less than 0.5 often 'rule out' HIT. Variation in the clinical care of patients with inconclusive ODs between 0.5 and 2 is likely. This single-centre, retrospective analysis evaluates the diagnosis, management and outcomes of those with antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2. We queried our institution's Healthcare Enterprise Repository for Ontological Narration (HERON) database to identify individuals with antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2. Chart review was completed to calculate 4T scores, corroborate diagnosis codes with documented information in our electronic health record (EHR) and evaluate the diagnosis, management and outcomes of these individuals. These data were evaluated using descriptive and univariate statistics. Among individuals evaluated for HIT between November 2007 and July 2020, we identified 302 individuals with ODs between 0.5 and 2. Serotonin release assays (SRAs) were assessed in 55% (165/302) and were positive in 12% (20/165). In those with available data, 96% with low 4T scores had negative SRAs and 4% had positive SRAs. As 4T scores and antibody ODs proportionally increased, SRA positivity also increased. Clinical management varied widely; however, 4T scoring remains a valuable assessment in this cohort. In those with HIT antibody ODs between 0.5 and 2, true positives were uncommon, and their clinical management varied widely. Fortunately, 4T scoring is a useful prognostic tool that improves the diagnosis and management among those with inconclusive HIT.

Reducing Inappropriate Simultaneous Ordering of Heparin Antibody and Serotonin Release Assays

INTRODUCTION

A 4T score with intermediate or high probability of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia prompts ordering of anti-platelet 4 heparin complex. If positive, a serotonin release assay (SRA) is recommended to confirm diagnosis. Despite these recommendations, overtesting of both anti-platelet 4 and SRA is highly prevalent.

METHODS

This was a quality improvement initiative using two forms of clinical decision support across 11 acute care hospitals. First, a 4T calculator was incorporated into anti-platelet 4 orders. Second, a Best Practice Advisory fired when anti-platelet 4 and SRA were ordered simultaneously, prompting the provider to remove the SRA order. Data were analyzed by a quasi-experimental interrupted time series linear regression comparing weekly average laboratory tests per 1,000 patient-days pre- and postintervention.

RESULTS

Average ordering frequency of anti-platelet 4 changed from 0.508 to 0.510 per 1,000 patient-days (0.5%, p = 0.42) without significant slope or level differences. Average ordering frequency of SRA decreased from 0.430 to 0.289 per 1,000 patient-days (32.8%, p < 0.001) with a significant level difference of -0.128 orders per 1,000 patient-days (-31.2%, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A simultaneous Best Practice Advisory was effective in reducing SRA orders, but not anti-platelet 4 orders.

Identification of Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Surgical Critically Ill Patients by Using the HIT Expert Probability Score: An Observational Pilot Study

Background: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains a challenging diagnosis especially in surgical intensive care unit (SICU) patients. The aim of the study was to evaluate for the first time the diagnostic accuracy of the HIT Expert Probability (HEP) score in the early identification of HIT in SICU patients. Methods: The HEP and 4Ts scores were calculated in all patients with suspected HIT during their stay in our SICU. The diagnosis of HIT was finally confirmed (HIT+ group) or excluded (HIT− group) by an independent committee blinded to the HEP and 4Ts score values. The primary outcome was the sensitivity and specificity of a HEP score ≥ 5 for the diagnosis of HIT. The secondary outcome was the area under the ROC curve (AUC) of the HEP and 4Ts scores in the diagnosis of HIT. Results: Respectively 6 and 113 patients were included in the HIT+ and HIT− groups. A HEP score value ≥ 5 had a sensitivity (95% confidence interval (95% CI)) of 1.00 (0.55−1.00), and a specificity (95% CI) of 0.92 (0.86−0.96). The AUC (95% CI) was significantly higher for the HEP score versus for the 4Ts score (0.967 (0.922−1.000) versus 0.707 (0.449−0.965); p = 0.035). Conclusions: A HEP score value < 5 could be helpful to rule out HIT in SICU patients.

Heparin Induced Thrombocytopenia for the Perioperative and Critical Care Clinician

Purpose of Review

This review will illustrate the importance of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in the intraoperative and critical care settings.

Recent Findings

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs more frequently in surgical patients compared with medical patients due to the inflammatory release of platelet factor 4 and perioperative heparin exposure. Recognition of this disease requires a high index of suspicion. Diagnostic tools and therapeutic strategies have been expanded and refined in recent years.

Summary

HIT is a condition where antibodies against the heparin/platelet factor 4 complex interact with platelet receptors to promote platelet activation, aggregation, and thrombus formation. Our review will focus on intraoperative and postoperative considerations related to HIT to help the clinician better manage this rare but often devastating hypercoagulable disease process.

Evaluation of Serotonin Release Assay and Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay Optical Density Thresholds for Heparin-Induced Thrombocytopenia in Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation

OBJECTIVES

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia is a recognized concern in patients on extracorporeal life support. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the applicability of an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optical density threshold less than 1 to rule out heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

DESIGN

Retrospective, single-center study.

SETTING

Patients were recruited from a prospectively maintained database of all patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation from 2012 to 2018 at a tertiary referral center.

PATIENTS

Forty-seven patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support.

INTERVENTIONS

The primary objective was to evaluate the application of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optical density thresholds and the serotonin release assay in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Patients were divided into two cohorts, serotonin release assay negative and serotonin release assay positive. In order to perform a sensitivity and specificity analysis of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay optical density thresholds, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia negative was defined as an optical density less than 1.0 and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia positive as an optical density greater than or equal to 1.0.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Utilizing the prespecified optical density thresholds, a specificity and negative predictive value of 89% and 95% were achieved, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

This assessment has helped to identify optical density thresholds for patients undergoing extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. Our data suggest that an optical density threshold of 1.0 may aid clinicians in objectively ruling out heparin-induced thrombocytopenia without sending a confirmatory serotonin release assay. Increasing the optical density threshold to 1.0 resulted in a high specificity and negative predictive value.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: Diagnostic challenges in intensive care patients especially with extracorporeal circulation

BACKGROUND

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a serious drug induced reaction that may be associated with life threatening complications. Platelet-activating antibodies directed against platelet factor 4 (PF4)/heparin complexes cause the disease. The diagnosis of HIT is challenging, as thrombocytopenia is a frequent finding in intensive care (ICU) patient population, especially during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the performance of a diagnostic algorithm for HIT in ICU patients.

METHODS

ICU patients who developed thrombocytopenia or thrombosis under heparin treatment were included in this study. The pretest probability for HIT was estimated using the 4Ts-score and patient's sera were tested using two rapid immunoassays (RA) LFI-HIT and PaGIA (from Milenia Biotec and DiaMed), and within 72 h using the IgG enzyme immunoassay (EIA) from Hyphen and the heparin induced platelet activation assay (HIPA).

RESULTS

392 consecutive ICU patients with suspected HIT were enrolled in this study, of whom 83/392 (21.2%) patients had extracorporeal circulation. Sera from 120/392 (30.6%) and 98/392 (25.0%) patients revealed positive results in RA and IgG EIA, respectively. The HIPA test revealed heparin-dependent platelet activation in a total of 15/392 (3.8%) ICU patients (3 medical and 12 surgical patients). In addition, sera from 7 patients revealed indeterminate HIPA results, of whom 2 patients had a clinical course compatible with HIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from our study confirm the high frequency of IgG PF4/heparin antibodies in ICU patients under unfractionated heparin and shows that the combination of 4Ts-score and RA does not reduce the laboratory overinvestigation for HIT in these patients.

Predictive value of scoring tools in determining heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

There are currently no scoring tools validated for use in predicting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This study aims to determine the predictive value of the Warkentin 4T score, Lilo-Le Louet score, and the heparin-induced thrombocytopenia expert probability score in detecting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. This was a single center, retrospective, observational cohort study of patients at Rush University Medical Center. Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia–positive patients were defined as those with an optical density greater than or equal to 0.4, consistent with a positive anti-platelet 4 heparin antibody. Out of 39 patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation with suspected heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, six (15.4%) were found to be anti-platelet 4–positive. A heparin-induced thrombocytopenia diagnosis was confirmed by serotonin-release assay in two patients (5.1%). The 4T, heparin-induced thrombocytopenia expert probability, and Lilo-Le Louet scoring tools all demonstrated a low positive predictive value (21.4%, 16.7%, and 6.7%, respectively), with the 4T and heparin-induced thrombocytopenia expert probability scores demonstrating the highest specificity (66.7% and 84.8%, respectively) and lowest sensitivity (50% and 16.7%, respectively). The Lilo-Le Louet score had high sensitivity (100%) and low specificity (12.5%) in post-cardiopulmonary bypass patients. Based on the findings of this study, all three scoring tools have limited utility for predicting heparin-induced thrombocytopenia in patients on extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Limited impact of clinician education on reducing inappropriate PF4 testing for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

A high frequency of PF4-ELISA testing in patients suspected to have heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) despite low 4T scores has been observed in multiple medical centers. Education of clinicians has been suggested to reduce inappropriate testing. We determined trends of PF4-ELISA testing in our institution after the introduction of a HIT education program for clinicians. A HIT Program was developed that included ongoing education, individual feedback, and continuous clinical audit of PF4-ELISA utilization. To assess the impact of education on PF4-ELISA testing trends, we conducted a prospective cohort review of all adult patients who had a PF4-ELISA ordered over a 3 month period (the last quarter of the academic year). 72 PF4-ELISA tests were ordered during the study period. Prospectively calculated 4T scores by investigators revealed 60 low-risk (83.3%), 9 intermediate-risk (12.5%), and 3 high-risk (4.16%). We observed divergent 4T scores with the ordering clinician calculating a higher 4T score compared to the Hematology Quality Improvement (QI) team. The majority of PF4-ELISA testing was ordered by the intensive care units (ICUs) (n = 32, 44.44%). Our study revealed that the frequency of calculation of 4T scores remains poor with the majority inappropriately performed in the ICU setting, with ordering clinicians calculating higher 4T scores than the Hematology QI team. This suggests that clinician education alone is insufficient. Introducing mandatory 4T score calculation prior to PF4-ELISA testing may not be helpful as ordering clinicians can bypass the restriction through inaccurate 4T score calculation.

Evaluation of Thrombocytopenia in Critically Ill Patients Receiving Continuous Renal Replacement Therapy

BACKGROUND

Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may be associated with thrombocytopenia in critically ill patients. A confounding factor is concomitant use of unfractionated heparin (UFH) and suspicion for heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the impact of CRRT on platelet count and development of thrombocytopenia.

METHODS

Retrospective analyses evaluated the intrapatient change in platelet count following CRRT initiation. Critically ill adult patients who received CRRT for at least 48 hours were included. The primary outcome was intrapatient change in platelet count from CRRT initiation through the first 5 days of therapy. Secondary outcomes included thrombocytopenia incidence, identification of concomitant factors associated with thrombocytopenia, and frequency of HIT.

RESULTS

80 patients were included. Median platelet count at CRRT initiation (D0) was 128000/µL (81500-212500/µL), which was higher than those on subsequent post-CRRT days (D1: 104500/µL [63000-166750/µL]; D2: 88500/µL [53500-136750/µL]; D3: 91000/µL [49000-138000/µL]; D4: 93000/µL [46000-134000/µL]; and D5: 76000/µL [45500-151000/µL]; P < 0.05 for all). Twenty-five (35%) patients had thrombocytopenia on CRRT D0 compared with D2 (56.3%), D3 (58.7%), and D5 (59.1%); P < 0.05 for all. Controlling for potential confounders, Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score at the time of CRRT initiation was the only independent factor associated with thrombocytopenia. One (1.3%) patient had confirmed HIT. Conclusion and Relevance: This study is the first to demonstrate serial decreases in platelet count across multiple days after CRRT initiation. These data may provide additional insight to thrombocytopenia development in critically ill patients receiving heparin while on CRRT that is not associated with HIT.

The effect of obesity on the rate of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia

: Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) occurs in patients receiving heparin-containing products due to the formation of platelet-activating antibodies to heparin and platelet factor 4. Diagnosis includes utilization of a scoring system known as the 4-T score, and HIT laboratory assays. Recently, obesity was identified as a potential factor associated with the development of HIT. The objective of this study was to evaluate the association of HIT with obesity in ICU and general medicine patients. We performed a chart review of adult patients within the Methodist Healthcare System, and included patients who had an ELISA and serotonin release assay laboratory tests reported within same hospital admission in which they also had documented receipt of heparin. Obese patients were compared with nonobese patients (BMI < 30) for the primary outcome of HIT occurrence, and secondary outcomes including rate of thrombosis, 4-T scores, and ELISA optical density values. We also generated a 5-T score by including one additional point for those with a BMI of 30 or more to determine the predictive value of this score in identifying HIT. Obesity was confirmed to be a risk factor for HIT, and the 5-T score model was also predictive of the development of HIT. However, the 5-T score was not statistically more predictive of HIT than the 4-T score. Predicting HIT remains challenging and novel markers of HIT are needed to improve HIT recognition. Although obesity did not improve the 4-T score, it may improve the predictability of other scoring systems, and further investigation is warranted.

Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia: A critical appraisal of clinical practice guidelines with the AGREE II instrument

BACKGROUND

Despite the availability of clinical practice guidelines (CPGs), the risk of death or thromboembolic complication associated with heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) remains high. Our aim was to systematically review the quality of CPGs for HIT and summarize the recommendations.

METHODS

CPGs for HIT were systematically searched on PubMed, Embase, guidelines' websites, and Google up to August 6, 2017. Independently, three appraisers assessed the quality of CPGs using the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research & Evaluation II (AGREE II) instrument and extracted the data. Recommendations were summarized, and a comparative study was conducted to analyze the consistency among guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 11 CPGs were evaluated. The quality assessed by AGREE II varied widely, not only between domains within guidelines, but also between guidelines across domains. The domain of scope and purpose and clarity of presentation obtained the highest median scores, while the domain of rigor of development and editorial independence obtained the lowest median scores. The ACCP guideline and BSH guideline were recommended for use in dealing with HIT, achieving a score of at least 50% in all six AGREE II domains. Recommendations across guidelines were inconsistent, especially in the choice of non-heparin anticoagulant for HIT.

CONCLUSIONS

Future HIT guidelines should place more emphasis on methodological quality and improve efforts to include cost and local availability of drugs when providing recommendations.