Somatosensory Functions in Survivors of Critical Illness

Characteristics and influence on quality of life of new-onset pain in critical COVID-19 survivors

Background

Pain is a clinical feature of COVID‐19, however, data about persistent pain after hospital discharge, especially among ICU survivors is scarce. The aim of this study was to explore the incidence and characteristics of new‐onset pain and its impact on Health‐Related Quality of Life (HRQoL), and to quantify the presence of mood disorders in critically ill COVID‐19 survivors.

Methods

This is a preliminary report of PAIN‐COVID trial (NCT04394169) presenting a descriptive analysis in critically ill COVID‐19 survivors, following in person interview 1 month after hospital discharge. Pain was assessed using the Brief Pain Inventory, the Douleur Neuropathique 4 questionnaire and the Pain Catastrophizing Scale. HRQoL was evaluated with the EQ 5D/5L, and mood disorders with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).

Results

From 27 May to 19 July 2020, 203 patients were consecutively screened for eligibility, and 65 were included in this analysis. Of these, 50.8% patients reported new‐onset pain; 38.5% clinically significant pain (numerical rating score ≥3 for average pain intensity); 16.9% neuropathic pain; 4.6% pain catastrophizing thoughts, 44.6% pain in ≥2 body sites and 7.7% widespread pain. Patients with new‐onset pain had a worse EQ‐VAS and EQ index value (p < 0.001). Pain intensity was negatively correlated to both the former (Spearman ρ: −0.546, p < 0.001) and the latter (Spearman ρ: −0.387, p = 0.001). HADS anxiety and depression values equal or above eight were obtained in 10.8% and 7.7% of patients, respectively.

Conclusion

New‐onset pain in critically ill COVID‐19 survivors is frequent, and it is associated with a lower HRQoL.

Trial registration No.: NCT04394169. Registered 19 May 2020. https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04394169.

Significance

A substantial proportion of severe COVID‐19 survivors may develop clinically significant persistent pain, post‐intensive care syndrome and chronic ICU‐related pain. Given the number of infections worldwide and the unprecedented size of the population of critical illness survivors, providing information about the incidence of new‐onset pain, its characteristics, and its influence on the patients’ quality of life might help establish and improve pain management strategies.

Musculoskeletal complications following critical illness: A scoping review

PURPOSE

To explore the extent to which musculoskeletal (MSK) complications have been reported following critical illness, identifying evidence gaps and providing recommendations for future research.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched five databases from January 1st 2000 to March 31st 2021. We included published original research reporting MSK complications in patients discharged from hospital following an admission to an intensive care unit (ICU). Two reviewers independently screened English language articles for eligibility. Data extracted included the MSK area of investigation and MSK outcome measures. The overall quality of study was evaluated against standardised reporting guidelines.

RESULTS

4512 titles were screened, and 32 met the inclusion criteria. Only one study included was interventional, with the majority being prospective cohort studies (n = 22). MSK complications identified included: muscle weakness or atrophy, chronic pain, neuromuscular dysfunction, peripheral joint impairment and fracture risk. The quality of the overall reporting in the studies was deemed adequate.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified a heterogenous body of literature reporting a high prevalence of a variety of MSK complications extending beyond muscle weakness, therefore future investigation should include evaluations of more than one MSK area. Further investigation of MSK complications could inform the development of future post critical illness rehabilitation programs.

Occurrence and Risk Factors of Chronic Pain After Critical Illness

OBJECTIVES

Occurrence, risk factors, and impact on daily life of chronic pain after critical illness have not been systematically studied.

DESIGN

Cohort study.

SETTING

A tertiary ICU in The Netherlands.

PATIENTS

We surveyed patients who had been discharged from our ICU between 2013 and 2016. Three cohorts were defined as follows: 1) ICU survivors; 2) one-year survivors reporting newly-acquired chronic pain; and (3) one-year survivors with pain who lived within 50 km from the study hospital. In cohort 1, we estimated the prevalence of new chronic pain 1 year after ICU discharge and constructed a prediction model for its occurrence incorporating three outcomes: death during follow-up, surviving without new pain, and surviving with newly-acquired pain. In cohort 2, we determined clinical features of pain and its impact on daily life. In cohort 3, we assessed the presence of neuropathic characteristics of pain.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The three cohorts contained 1,842, 160, and 42 patients, respectively. Estimated occurrence of new chronic pain was 17.7% (95% CI, 15.8-19.8%; n = 242) in 1-year survivors (n = 1,368). Median pain intensity on the numeric rating scale was 4 (interquartile range, 2-6) in the week before survey response, with impact being most evident on activities of daily living, social activities, and mobility. Neuropathic pain features were present in 50% (95% CI, 37-68%) of affected subjects. Among nine predictor variables included in a multinomial model, only female gender and days in ICU with hyperinflammation were associated with pain.

CONCLUSIONS

Newly-acquired chronic pain is a frequent consequence of critical illness, and its impact on daily life of affected patients is substantial.

Physician and Nurse Research in Multidisciplinary Intensive Care Units

BACKGROUND

Although clinical care is multidisciplinary, intensive care unit research commonly focuses on single-discipline themes. We sought to characterize intensive care unit research conducted by physicians and nurses.

METHODS

One hundred randomly selected reports of clinical studies published in critical care medical and nursing journals were reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 100 articles reviewed, 50 were published in medical journals and 50 were published in nursing journals. Only 1 medical study (2%) used qualitative methods, compared with 9 nursing studies (18%) (P = .02). The distribution of quantitative study designs differed between medical and nursing journals (P < .001), with medical journals having a predominance of cohort studies (29 articles [58%]). Compared with medical journal articles, nursing journal articles had significantly fewer authors (median [interquartile range], 5 [3-6] vs 8 [6-10]; P < .001) and study participants (94 [51-237] vs 375 [86-4183]; P < .001) and a significantly lower proportion of male study participants (55% [26%-65%] vs 60% [51%-65%]; P = .02). Studies published in medical journals were much more likely than those published in nursing journals to exclusively involve patients as participants (47 [94%] vs 25 [50%]; P < .001). Coauthorship between physicians and nurses was evident in 14 articles (14%), with infrequent inclusion of authors from other health care disciplines.

CONCLUSIONS

Physician research and nurse research differ in several important aspects and tend to occur within silos. Increased interprofessional collaboration is possible and worthwhile.

Persistent pain in intensive care survivors: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

According to earlier studies where the main aim has been quality of life, there is growing evidence of increased levels of persistent pain in survivors of critical illness. The cause of admission and several factors during intensive care may have associated risk factors for pain persistence. This systematic review aims to determine the incidence or prevalence of persistent pain after critical illness and to identify risk factors for it.

METHODS

Six databases were searched, and eventually nine studies were included in the final systematic process. The validity of observational and cross-sectional studies was analysed using the National Institute of Health 'Quality Assessment Tool for Observational Cohort and Cross-Sectional Studies'.

RESULTS

The incidence of persistent pain after intensive care varied from 28% to 77%. Risk factors for persistent pain were acute pain at discharge from ICU, higher thoracic trauma score, surgery, pre-existing pain, organ failure, longer length of ventilator or hospital stay, and sepsis. No difference in incidence between medical and surgical patients was found.

CONCLUSIONS

New systematic, observational studies are warranted to identify persistent pain-related factors in intensive care to improve pain management protocols and thereby diminish the risk of persistent pain after ICU stay.

Chronic pain in critical care survivors: a narrative review

Chronic pain is an important problem after critical care admission. Estimates of the prevalence of chronic pain in the year after discharge range from 14% to 77% depending on the type of cohort, the tool used to measure pain, and the time point when pain was assessed. The majority of data available come from studies using health-related quality of life tools, although some have included pain-specific tools. Nociceptive, neuropathic, and nociplastic pain can occur in critical care survivors, but limited information about the aetiology, body site, and temporal trajectory of pain is currently available. Older age, pre-existing pain, and medical co-morbidity have been associated with pain after critical care admission. No trials were identified of interventions to target chronic pain in survivors specifically. Larger studies, using pain-specific tools, over an extended follow-up period are required to confirm the prevalence, identify risk factors, explore any association between acute and chronic pain in this setting, determine the underlying pathological mechanisms, and inform the development of future analgesic interventions.

Chronic intensive care-related pain: Exploratory analysis on predictors and influence on health-related quality of life

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence for the development of chronic pain after intensive care. Nonetheless, there is only limited knowledge about factors leading to chronic intensive care-related pain (CIRP). Thus, the primary objective was the identification of predictors of CIRP. Moreover, we aimed to assess the impact of CIRP on patients' health-related quality of Life (HRQOL).

METHODS

Comprehensive information on patients' pain before ICU admission and present pain was collected longitudinally by means of the German Pain Questionnaire 6 and 12 months after ICU discharge (ICU_DC ). In addition, a subsample of patients underwent Quantitative Sensory Testing (QST). We used Generalized Estimating Equations to identify predictors of CIRP with logistic regression models.

RESULTS

In total, 204 patients (197/159 at 6/12 months after ICU_DC ) were available for the analyses. In the multivariate models, moderate to severe average pain in the 4 weeks after ICU_DC , lower age, female sex, increased inflammation and chronic pain conditions and increased levels of anxiety before ICU admission were predictive for CIRP. In addition, small fibre deficits and lower disease severity were associated with CIRP in the QST subsample (81 patients, 77/55 at 6/12 months after ICU_DC ). Patients with CIRP reported significantly lower HRQOL than patients without CIRP.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic intensive care-related pain is associated with specific decrements in HRQOL. Knowledge about the identified predictors is of clinical and scientific importance and might help to reduce the incidence of CIRP.

SIGNIFICANCE

Chronic intensive care-related pain is associated with specific decrements in health-related quality of life. While most of the identified predictors for CIRP can only be considered as risk factors, especially adequate (post-) acute pain management should be studied as preventive strategy.

Age-Related Changes in Immunological and Physiological Responses Following Pulmonary Challenge

This review examines the current status of knowledge of sepsis and pneumonia in the elderly population and how the dynamics of the pulmonary challenge affects outcome and consequences. Led by an unprecedented shift in demographics, where a larger proportion of the population will reach an older age, clinical and experimental research shows that aging is associated with certain pulmonary changes, but it is during infectious insult of the lungs, as in the case of pneumonia, that the age-related differences in responsiveness and endurance become obvious and lead to a worse outcome than in the younger population. This review points to the neutrophil, and the endothelium as important players in understanding age-associated changes in responsiveness to infectious challenge of the lung. It also addresses how the immunological set-point influences injury-repair phases, remote organ damage and how intake of drugs may alter the state of responsiveness in the users. Further, it points out the importance of considering age as a factor in inclusion criteria in clinical trials, in vitro/ex vivo experimental designs and overall interpretation of results.