Ultrasound as a Screening Tool for Central Venous Catheter Positioning and Exclusion of Pneumothorax

Central venous catheter tip positioning using ultrasound in pediatric patients-A prospective observational study

BACKGROUND

In children, central venous catheter (CVC) placement is usually performed under ultrasound guidance for optimal visualization of vessels and reduction of puncture-related complications. Nevertheless, in many cases, additional radiographic examinations are performed to check the position of the catheter tip.

AIM

The primary objective of this observational feasibility study was to determine the number of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter tips that can be identified in a subsequent position check using ultrasonography. Furthermore, we investigated the optimal ultrasound window, time expenditure, and success rate concerning puncture attempts and side effects. In addition, we compared the calculated and real insertion depths and analyzed the position of the catheter tip on postoperative radiographs with the tracheal bifurcation as a traditional landmark.

METHODS

Ninety children with congenital heart defects who required a central venous line for cardiac surgery were included in this single-center study. After the insertion of the catheter, the optimal position of its tip was controlled using one of four predefined ultrasound windows. A chest radiograph was obtained postoperatively in accordance with hospital standards to check the catheter tip position determined by ultrasonography.

RESULTS

The children had a median (IQR) age of 11.5 (4.0, 58.8) months and a mean (SD) BMI of 15.3 (2.91) kg/m2 Ultrasound visualization of the catheter tip was successful in 86/90 (95.6%) children (95% confidence interval [CI]: 91.3%, 99.8%). Postoperative radiographic examination showed that the catheter tip was in the desired position in 94.4% (95% CI: 89.7%, 99.2%) of the cases. None of the children needed the catheter tip position being corrected based on chest radiography.

CONCLUSION

Additional radiation exposure after the placement of central venous catheters can be avoided with the correct interpretation of standardized ultrasound windows, especially in vulnerable children with cardiac disease.

Are routine chest radiographs still indicated after central line insertion? A scoping review

Introduction

Central venous catheters are increasingly inserted using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) guidance. Following insertion, it is still common to request a confirmatory chest radiograph for subclavian and internal jugular lines, at least outside of the operating theater. This scoping review addresses: (i) the justification for routine post-insertion radiographs, (ii) whether it would better to use post-insertion POCUS instead, and (iii) the perceived barriers to change.

Methods

We searched the electronic databases, Ovid MEDLINE (1946-) and Ovid EMBASE (1974-), using the MESH terms ("Echography" OR "Ultrasonography" OR "Ultrasound") AND "Central Venous Catheter" up until February 2023. We also searched clinical practice guidelines, and targeted literature, including cited and citing articles. We included adults (⩾18 years) and English and French language publications. We included randomized control trials, prospective and retrospective cohort studies, systematic reviews, and surveys.

Results

Four thousand seventy-one articles were screened, 117 full-text articles accessed, and 41 retained. Thirteen examined cardiac/vascular methods; 5 examined isolated contrast-enhanced ultrasonography; 7 examined isolated rapid atrial swirl sign; and 13 examined combined/integrated methods. In addition, three systematic reviews/meta-analyses and one survey addressed barriers to POCUS adoption.

Discussion

We believe that the literature supports retiring the routine post-central line chest radiograph. This is not only because POCUS has made line insertion safer, but because POCUS performs at least as well, and is associated with less radiation, lower cost, time savings, and greater accuracy. There has been less written about perceived barriers to change, but the literature shows that these concerns- which include upfront costs, time-to-train, medicolegal concerns and habit- can be challenged and hence overcome.

ECHOTIP: A structured protocol for ultrasound-based tip navigation and tip location during placement of central venous access devices in adult patients

Central venous access devices are routinely used in clinical practice for administration of fluids and medications, for drawing blood samples and for hemodynamic monitoring. The adoption of ultrasound guided venipuncture has significantly reduced procedure-related complications, as documented by the recommendations of most recent guidelines. Ultrasound has also an important role also in other aspects of central venous catheterization, such as in the pre-procedural evaluation of the venous patrimony and in the detection of early and late non-infective complications. Recently, bedside ultrasound has been regarded as a promising tool also for ensuring an accurate and intraprocedural method of tip navigation and tip location. The aim of this paper is to review all the evidence about the accuracy of ultrasound methods for tip navigation and tip location in adult patients, and to suggest a structured standardized protocol for clinical practice.

Surgical Science and the Evolution of Critical Care Medicine

Surgical science has driven innovation and inquiry across adult and pediatric disciplines that provide critical care regardless of location. Surgically originated but broadly applicable knowledge has been globally shared within the pages Critical Care Medicine over the last 50 years.

EFSUMB Clinical Practice Guidelines for Point-of-Care Ultrasound: Part One (Common Heart and Pulmonary Applications) LONG VERSION

AIMS

 To evaluate the evidence and produce a summary and recommendations for the most common heart and lung applications of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS).

METHODS

 We reviewed 10 clinical domains/questions related to common heart and lung applications of PoCUS. Following review of the evidence, a summary and recommendation were produced, including assignment of levels of evidence (LoE) and grading of the recommendation, assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). 38 international experts, the expert review group (ERG), were invited to review the evidence presented for each question. A level of agreement of over 75 % was required to progress to the next section. The ERG then reviewed and indicated their level of agreement regarding the summary and recommendation for each question (using a 5-point Likert scale), which was approved if a level of agreement of greater than 75 % was reached. A level of agreement was defined as a summary of "strongly agree" and "agree" on the Likert scale responses.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

 One question achieved a strong consensus for an assigned LoE of 3 and a weak GRADE recommendation (question 1). The remaining 9 questions achieved broad agreement with one assigned an LoE of 4 and weak GRADE recommendation (question 2), three achieving an LoE of 3 with a weak GRADE recommendation (questions 3-5), three achieved an LoE of 3 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 6-8), and the remaining two were assigned an LoE of 2 with a strong GRADE recommendation (questions 9 and 10).

CONCLUSION

 These consensus-derived recommendations should aid clinical practice and highlight areas of further research for PoCUS in acute settings.

The Incremental Role of Multiorgan Point-of-Care Ultrasounds in the Emergency Setting

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) represents a goal-directed ultrasound examination performed by clinicians directly involved in patient healthcare. POCUS has been widely used in emergency departments, where US exams allow physicians to make quick diagnoses and to recognize early life-threatening conditions which require prompt interventions. Although initially meant for the real-time evaluation of cardiovascular and respiratory pathologies, its use has been extended to a wide range of clinical applications, such as screening for deep-vein thrombosis and trauma, abdominal ultrasonography of the right upper quadrant and appendix, and guidance for invasive procedures. Moreover, recently, bedside ultrasounds have been used to evaluate the fluid balance and to guide decongestive therapy in acutely decompensated heart failure. The aim of the present review was to discuss the most common applications of POCUS in the emergency setting.

Assessment of the Tip Position of Central Venous Catheters Inserted Using Peres' Height Formula

OBJECTIVES

The tip of a central venous catheter (CVC) should be positioned in the proximity of the cavo-atrial junction (CAJ) where the lower third of the superior vena cava (SVC) and the upper right atrium (RA) are located to prevent life-threatening complications. This study aimed to determine the accuracy of Peres' height formula in predicting the correct insertion depth of CVC.  Methods: A total of 332 patients were enrolled in this prospective observational study. All CVCs were inserted using Peres' formula. The 'correct' tip position of CVC was the placement of the CVC tip 1 cm above and 1 cm below the carina in CXR. Rates of correct placements for each side and site of catheter insertions, gender, and body mass index (BMI) differences were evaluated.

RESULTS

The correct placement rate of all catheters was 74.4%. There were statistically significant correlations between the correct placement of right-sided jugular and subclavian catheters (p<0.001) and left-sided jugular and subclavian catheters (p=0.014). There was a statistically significant difference in male patients (p=0.047). Higher BMI resulted in a lower rate of correct placement with no statistically significant difference (p=0.457).

CONCLUSIONS

Peres' formula can be easily used to determine the correct position of CVC tips with a success rate in the Turkish population. However, practitioners should be aware of the low accuracy rate of Peres' formula in female patients (68.5%) and patients with BMI over 35 kg/m² (62.5%).

Economic Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation vs Chest Radiography in Critically Ill Patients: A Labor Cost Model

INTRODUCTION

Despite evidence suggesting that point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is faster and non-inferior for confirming position and excluding pneumothorax after central venous catheter (CVC) placement compared to traditional radiography, millions of chest radiographs (CXR) are performed annually for this purpose. Whether the use of POCUS results in cost savings compared to CXR is less clear but could represent a relative advantage in implementation efforts. Our objective in this study was to evaluate the labor cost difference for POCUS-guided vs CXR-guided CVC position confirmation practices.

METHODS

We developed a model to evaluate the per patient difference in labor cost between POCUS-guided vs CXR-guided CVC confirmation at our local urban, tertiary academic institution. We used internal cost data from our institution to populate the variables in our model.

RESULTS

The estimated labor cost per patient was $18.48 using CXR compared to $14.66 for POCUS, resulting in a net direct cost savings of $3.82 (21%) per patient using POCUS for CVC confirmation.

CONCLUSION

In this study comparing the labor costs of two approaches for CVC confirmation, the more efficient alternative (POCUS-guided) is not more expensive than traditional CXR. Performing an economic analysis framed in terms of labor costs and work efficiency may influence stakeholders and facilitate earlier adoption of POCUS for CVC confirmation.

Real time wire localization by ultrasound during central line insertion improves accurate positioning in all upper torso sites

PURPOSE

To investigate whether point of care ultrasound can improve central venous catheter tip positioning.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A single center retrospective case control study. We compared the precision of central venous catheter tip positioning between two intensive care units while in only one of the units, we used point of care ultrasound for guidewire identification.

RESULTS

207 cases in which central venous catheter was inserted using point of care ultrasound guided method, compared to 192 controls. The primary outcome of correct placement of the central venous catheter tip was significantly higher in the point of care ultrasound guided group (97.6% vs 88.0% p = 0.001). Central venous catheter tip was located too low among 12% of patients in the control group while in only 2.4% of patients in the point of care ultrasound group (p = 0.001). Logistics regression analysis revealed that the correct placement of central venous catheter tip in the point of care ultrasound group versus the control group had an odds ratio of 4.9 (CI 1.6-14.5 P = 0.004).

CONCLUSION

Point of care ultrasound for guidewire identification and localization, while inserting central venous catheter from all upper torso sites, improves precision positioning.

Protocol for DRAUP: a deimplementation programme to decrease routine chest radiographs after central venous catheter insertion

Introduction

Avoiding low value medical practices is an important focus in current healthcare utilisation. Despite advantages of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) over chest X-ray including improved workflow and timeliness of results, POCUS-guided central venous catheter (CVC) position confirmation has slow rate of adoption. This demonstrates a gap that is ripe for the development of an intervention.

Methods

The intervention is a deimplementation programme called DRAUP (deimplementation of routine chest radiographs after adoption of ultrasound-guided insertion and confirmation of central venous catheter protocol) that will be created to address one unnecessary imaging modality in the acute care environment. We propose a three-phase approach to changing low-value practices. In phase 1, we will be guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research framework to explore barriers and facilitators of POCUS for CVC confirmation in a single centre, large tertiary, academic hospital via focus groups. The qualitative methods will inform the development and adaptation of strategies that address identified determinants of change. In phase 2, the multifaceted strategies will be conceptualised using Morgan’s framework for understanding and reducing medical overuse. In phase 3, we will locally implement these strategies and assess them using Proctor’s outcomes (adoption, deadoption, fidelity and penetration) in an observational study to demonstrate proof of concept, gaining valuable insights on the programme. Secondary outcomes will include POCUS-guided CVC confirmation efficacy measured by time and effectiveness measured by sensitivity and specificity of POCUS confirmation after CVC insertion.

With limited data available to inform interventions that use concurrent implementation and deimplementation strategies to substitute chest X-ray for POCUS using the DRAUP programme, we propose that this primary implementation and secondary effectiveness pilot study will provide novel data that will expand the knowledge of implementation approaches to replacing low value or unnecessary care in acute care environments.

Ethics and dissemination

Approval of the study by the Human Research Protection Office has been obtained. This work will be disseminated by publication of peer-reviewed manuscripts, presentation in abstract form at scientific meetings and data sharing with other investigators through academically established means.

Trial registration number

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier, NCT04324762, registered on 27 March 2020.

Diagnostic accuracy among trainees to safely confirm peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement using bedside ultrasound

BACKGROUND

Real-time utilization of ultrasound to confirm peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) placement improves efficacy and reduces patient radiation exposure. We evaluated if novice ultrasound users could accurately confirm appropriate PICC tip location via ultrasound assessment.

METHODOLOGY

A prospective data collection study was conducted in an academic center with an established PICC team. Novice ultrasonography users performed 2 echocardiographic views (subcostal and apical 4 chamber) and noted position of visible wire. The presence of central bubbles (visualized in the heart) after a saline infusion, as well as time to bubbles (push-to-bubbles) seen in all patients, was also recorded. Image quality and confidence in imaging acquisition was also recorded.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients between ages 0 and 18 were enrolled over the study period with mean patient age of 10 years and median weight of 34 kg. The quality of image acquisition was rated as great only 34-44%. The wire was visualized only 25% of the time. The median push-to-bubble time when the PICC was later confirmed to be in appropriate positioning was 1.5 seconds with a delay of greater than 3 seconds 40% of the time when the line was malpositioned. The overall positive predictive value of ultrasound identifying malpositioned lines in this study was 43%.

CONCLUSIONS

With this PICC placement technique, ultrasound confirmation of PICC placement by novice ultrasound users was not superior to confirmation with chest radiograph. There may remain potential for future ultrasound protocols, with pediatric-specific technology or echogenic catheter tips, to reduce radiation exposure from chest radiograph during PICC line positioning verification.

Point-of-care Ultrasound-guided Central Venous Catheter Confirmation in Ultrasound Nonexperts

OBJECTIVE

Emerging evidence suggests that chest radiography (CXR) following central venous catheter (CVC) placement is unnecessary when point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) is used to confirm catheter position and exclude pneumothorax. However, few providers have adopted this practice, and it is unknown what contributing factors may play a role in this lack of adoption, such as ultrasound experience. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of POCUS to confirm CVC position and exclude a pneumothorax after brief education and training of nonexperts.

METHODS

We performed a prospective cohort study in a single academic medical center to determine the diagnostic characteristics of a POCUS-guided CVC confirmation protocol after brief training performed by POCUS nonexperts. POCUS nonexperts (emergency medicine senior residents and critical care fellows) independently performed a POCUS-guided CVC confirmation protocol after a 30-minute didactic training. The primary outcome was the diagnostic accuracy of the POCUS-guided CVC confirmation protocol for malposition and pneumothorax detection. Secondary outcomes were efficiency and feasibility of adequate image acquisition, adjudicated by POCUS experts.

RESULTS

Twenty-six POCUS nonexperts collected data on 190 patients in the final analysis. There were five (2.5%) CVC malpositions and six (3%) pneumothoraxes on CXR. The positive likelihood ratios of POCUS for malposition detection and pneumothorax were 12.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 3.26 to 46.69) and 3.41 (95% CI = 0.51 to 22.76), respectively. The accuracy of POCUS for pneumothorax detection compared to CXR was 0.93 (95% CI = 0.88 to 0.96) and the sensitivity was 0.17 (95% CI = 0.00 to 0.64). The median (interquartile range) time for CVC confirmation was lower for POCUS (9 minutes [8.5-9.5 minutes]) compared to CXR (29 minutes [1-269 minutes]; Mann-Whitney U, p < 0.01). Adequate protocol image acquisition was achieved in 76% of the patients.

CONCLUSION

Thirty-minute training of POCUS in nonexperts demonstrates adequate diagnostic accuracy, efficiency, and feasibility of POCUS-guided CVC position confirmation, but not exclusion of pneumothorax.

ACR Appropriateness Criteria® Intensive Care Unit Patients

Chest radiography is the most frequent and primary imaging modality in the intensive care unit (ICU), given its portability, rapid image acquisition, and availability of immediate information on the bedside preview. Due to the severity of underlying disease and frequent need of placement of monitoring devices, ICU patients are very likely to develop complications related to underlying disease process and interventions. Portable chest radiography in the ICU is an essential tool to monitor the disease process and the complications from interventions; however, it is subject to overuse especially in stable patients. Restricting the use of chest radiographs in the ICU to only when indicated has not been shown to cause harm. The emerging role of bedside point-of-care lung ultrasound performed by the clinicians is noted in the recent literature. The bedside lung ultrasound appears promising but needs cautious evaluation in the future to determine its role in ICU patients. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. The guideline development and revision include an extensive analysis of current medical literature from peer reviewed journals and the application of well-established methodologies (RAND/UCLA Appropriateness Method and Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation or GRADE) to rate the appropriateness of imaging and treatment procedures for specific clinical scenarios. In those instances where evidence is lacking or equivocal, expert opinion may supplement the available evidence to recommend imaging or treatment.

Use of Point-of-Care Ultrasound to Confirm Central Venous Catheter Placement and Evaluate for Postprocedural Complications

BACKGROUND

Central venous catheter (CVC) placement is commonly performed in the emergency department (ED), but traditional confirmation of placement includes chest radiograph.

OBJECTIVE

This manuscript details the use of point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) to confirm placement of a CVC and evaluate for postprocedural complications.

DISCUSSION

CVC access in the ED setting is an important procedure. Traditional confirmation includes chest radiograph. POCUS is a rapid, inexpensive, and accurate modality to confirm CVC placement and evaluate for postprocedural complications. POCUS after CVC can evaluate lung sliding for pneumothorax and the internal jugular vein for misdirected CVC. A bubble study with POCUS visualizing agitated saline microbubbles within the right heart can confirm venous placement.

CONCLUSIONS

POCUS can rapidly and reliably confirm CVC placement, as well as evaluate for postprocedural complications. Knowledge of this technique can assist emergency clinicians.

[Complications and success rates of subclavian vein catheterization depending on experience]

BACKGROUND

The infraclavicular puncture of the subclavian vein is a standard procedure for anesthetists. Meanwhile the literature and recommendations are clear and the use of real-time ultrasound guidance is the standard procedure; however, anesthetists will always get into special circumstances were they have to use the landmark technique, so this competence must be preserved. Feared complications of infraclavicular subclavian vein puncture are pneumothorax and arterial puncture. Up to now there is no clear learning curve for the infraclavicular subclavian vein puncture in the landmark technique performed by anesthetists.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine the influence of the puncture experience on the success rate and mechanical complications, such as pneumothorax and arterial puncture in patients who received an infraclavicular subclavian vein puncture with the landmark technique. Three levels of experience were defined for comparison: inexperienced 0-20 punctures, moderately experienced 21-50 and experienced over 50 punctures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Post hoc analysis of a previously published noninferiority study to examine the influence of ventilation on the pneumothorax rate in the subclavian vein puncture using the landmark technique. This analysis included 1021 anesthetized patients who were included in the original study between August 2014 and October 2017. Demographic data as well as the number of puncture attempts, puncture success, the overall rate of mechanical complications, pneumothorax rate and arterial puncture rates were calculated.

RESULTS

The overall rate of mechanical complications (pneumothorax + arterial puncture) was significantly higher in the inexperienced group (0-21) compared to the experienced group (>50, 15% vs. 8.5%, respectively, p = 0.023). This resulted in an odds ratio of 0.52 (confidence interval, CI: 0.32-0.85, p = 0.027). Likewise, the rate of puncture attempts in the group of inexperienced (0-20) with 1.85 ± 1.12 was significantly higher than in the group of experienced (>50, 1.58 ± 0.99, p = 0.004) and resulted in an odds ratio of 0.59 (CI: 0.31-0.96, p = 0.028). Although the puncture attempts of the moderately experienced (21-50) compared to the inexperienced (0-20) was not significant lower, we found an odds ratio of 0.69 (CI: 0.48-0.99, p = 0.042). The rate of successful puncture was 95.1% in the experienced group versus 89.3% in the inexperienced group (p = 0.001), which resulted in an odds ratio of 2.35 (CI: 1.28-4.31, p = 0.018). When viewed individually, no significant differences were found for pneumothorax and arterial puncture.

CONCLUSION

In this post hoc analysis of the puncture of the subclavian vein using the landmark technique, we found a significant reduction of puncture attempts and overall mechanical complications. At least 50 punctures seem to be necessary to achieve the end of the learning curve; however, the landmark technique should only be used under special circumstances, when real-time ultrasound is not available. Anesthetists who want to complete their repertoire and learn the landmark technique should always perform a static ultrasound examination before starting the puncture in order to reduce complications due to anatomical variations or thrombosis.

[Catheterization of the subclavian vein and the risk of pneumothorax : Mechanical ventilation increases the risk of pneumothorax during infraclavicular landmark-guided subclavian vein puncture: a prospective randomized study]

BACKGROUND

Infraclavicular subclavian vein (SCV) catheterization is a standard procedure in anesthesia and intensive care. There is a lack of evidence on how mechanical ventilation during venipuncture of the SCV influences pneumothorax rates.

OBJECTIVE

Primary hypothesis: non-inferiority of continuing vs. discontinuing mechanical ventilation during infraclavicular puncture of the SCV with respect to the pneumothorax rate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective, randomized and single-blinded study was approved by the local ethics committee. A total of 1021 eligible patients who underwent cranial neurosurgery in 2 different university hospitals were assessed between August 2014 and October 2017. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups directly before induction of anesthesia. Intervention groups for venipuncture of the SCV were mechanical ventilation: tidal volume 7 ml/kg ideal body weight, positive end expiratory pressure (PEEP) ideal body weight/10, n = 535, or apnea: manual/spontaneous, APL valve 0 mbar, n = 486. Patients and the physicians who assessed pneumothorax rates were blinded to the intervention group. Venipuncture was carried out by both inexperienced and experienced physicians.

RESULTS

The pneumothorax rate was significantly higher in the mechanical ventilation group (2.2% vs. 0.4%; p = 0.012) with an odds ratio (OR) of 5.63 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.17-27.2; p = 0.031). A lower body mass index (BMI) was associated with a higher pneumothorax rate, OR 0.89 (95% CI: 0.70-0.96; p = 0.013).

CONCLUSION

In this study landmark-guided infraclavicular SCV catheterization was associated with a significantly higher rate of pneumothorax when venipuncture was performed during mechanical ventilation and not in apnea. If a short phase of apnea is justifiable in the patient, mechanical ventilation should be discontinued during the venipuncture procedure.

Should the ultrasound probe replace your stethoscope? A SICS-I sub-study comparing lung ultrasound and pulmonary auscultation in the critically ill

Background

In critically ill patients, auscultation might be challenging as dorsal lung fields are difficult to reach in supine-positioned patients, and the environment is often noisy. In recent years, clinicians have started to consider lung ultrasound as a useful diagnostic tool for a variety of pulmonary pathologies, including pulmonary edema. The aim of this study was to compare lung ultrasound and pulmonary auscultation for detecting pulmonary edema in critically ill patients.

Methods

This study was a planned sub-study of the Simple Intensive Care Studies-I, a single-center, prospective observational study. All acutely admitted patients who were 18 years and older with an expected ICU stay of at least 24 h were eligible for inclusion. All patients underwent clinical examination combined with lung ultrasound, conducted by researchers not involved in patient care. Clinical examination included auscultation of the bilateral regions for crepitations and rhonchi. Lung ultrasound was conducted according to the Bedside Lung Ultrasound in Emergency protocol. Pulmonary edema was defined as three or more B lines in at least two (bilateral) scan sites. An agreement was described by using the Cohen κ coefficient, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, positive predictive value, and overall accuracy. Subgroup analysis were performed in patients who were not mechanically ventilated.

Results

The Simple Intensive Care Studies-I cohort included 1075 patients, of whom 926 (86%) were eligible for inclusion in this analysis. Three hundred seven of the 926 patients (33%) fulfilled the criteria for pulmonary edema on lung ultrasound. In 156 (51%) of these patients, auscultation was normal. A total of 302 patients (32%) had audible crepitations or rhonchi upon auscultation. From 130 patients with crepitations, 86 patients (66%) had pulmonary edema on lung ultrasound, and from 209 patients with rhonchi, 96 patients (46%) had pulmonary edema on lung ultrasound. The agreement between auscultation findings and lung ultrasound diagnosis was poor (κ statistic 0.25). Subgroup analysis showed that the diagnostic accuracy of auscultation was better in non-ventilated than in ventilated patients.

Conclusion

The agreement between lung ultrasound and auscultation is poor.

Trial registration

NCT02912624. Registered on September 23, 2016.

Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access 2020

These practice guidelines update the Practice Guidelines for Central Venous Access: A Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Central Venous Access, adopted by the American Society of Anesthesiologists in 2011 and published in 2012. These updated guidelines are intended for use by anesthesiologists and individuals under the supervision of an anesthesiologist and may also serve as a resource for other physicians, nurses, or healthcare providers who manage patients with central venous catheters.

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

Ultrasound Guidance for Central Venous Access: Current Evidence and Clinical Recommendations

Ultrasound-guided central line placement has been shown to decrease the number of needle puncture attempts, complication, and failure rates. In order to obtain successful central access, it is important to have adequate cognitive knowledge, workflow understanding, and manual dexterity to safely execute this invasive procedure. The operator should also be familiar with the anatomical variations, equipment operations, and potential complications and their prevention. In this article, we present a detailed review of ultrasound-guided central venous access. It includes a description of anatomy, operative technique, equipment operation, and techniques for specific situations. We describe the use of ultrasound guidance to avoid and identify various complications associated with this procedure. We have also reviewed recent recommendations and guidelines for the use of ultrasound for central venous access and the current evidence pertaining to the recommendations for the expected level of training, methodology, and metrics for establishing competency.

Cannulation of the Internal Mammary Vein With a Single-Lumen Infusion Catheter in a Patient With Portal Hypertension: A Case Report

We present a central venous catheter misplacement case. A left internal jugular vein percutaneous introducer was inserted for fluid resuscitation with a single-lumen infusion catheter placed through the lumen for medication infusions. Placement was performed under ultrasound guidance, with confirmation of the wire within the venous lumen. Radiographs suggested that the introducer had perforated the innominate vein. Contrast was injected through the single-lumen infusion catheter and showed cannulation of the left internal mammary vein. The link between portal hypertension and increased risk of central line misplacement as well as diagnosis and potential methods to avoid this rare complication are discussed.

Ultrasound-guided vascular access in critical illness

Over the past two decades, ultrasound (US) has become widely accepted to guide safe and accurate insertion of vascular devices in critically ill patients. We emphasize central venous catheter insertion, given its broad application in critically ill patients, but also review the use of US for accessing peripheral veins, arteries, the medullary canal, and vessels for institution of extracorporeal life support. To ensure procedural safety and high cannulation success rates we recommend using a systematic protocolized approach for US-guided vascular access in elective clinical situations. A standardized approach minimizes variability in clinical practice, provides a framework for education and training, facilitates implementation, and enables quality analysis. This review will address the state of US-guided vascular access, including current practice and future directions.

New insights in the use of pleural ultrasonography for diagnosis and treatment of pleural disease

The use of transthoracic ultrasound (US) has acquired a wide consensus among respiratory physicians during the last few years. The development of portable devices promotes patient's bedside evaluation providing rapid, real-time and low-cost diagnostic information. The different acoustic impedance between different tissues and organs produces artifacts known as A lines, B lines, sliding sign, lung point, etc. The identification of such artifacts is essential to discriminate normal pleural appearance from the presence of pleural effusion, pneumothorax, thickenings and tumors. Ultrasounds are also a valuable tool during interventional procedures, such as thoracentesis, chest tube insertion and transcutaneous biopsy. Its use is recommended before medical thoracoscopy in order to assess the best site of trocar insertion according to presence, quantity and characteristics of pleural effusion. The aim of this review is to provide practical tips on chest ultrasound in clinical and interventional respiratory practice.

Perioperative ultrasound-assisted clinical evaluation - A case based review

Ultrasound is increasingly being adopted into anaesthesia and intensive care practice. The range of ultrasound examination has also increased from transoesophageal echocardiography in cardiac surgery and ultrasound-guided nerve blocks and vascular access, to examination of the heart, lungs, abdomen and deep veins. Typically, the use of ultrasound is focused or basic, designed to be performed by the anaesthetist at the patient's bedside in real time to answer clinical questions and to direct therapy. Ultrasound is not performed in isolation, but used to complement clinical evaluation, and accordingly can be considered as 'ultrasound-assisted perioperative evaluation'. Whilst there is good evidence that ultrasound improves diagnostic accuracy and in turn alters management, there are few data examining whether ultrasound leads to improved clinical outcomes. This review will examine multiple uses of perioperative ultrasound with case studies to illustrate potential utility.

Rapid Central Vein Assessment (RaCeVA): A systematic, standardized approach for ultrasound assessment before central venous catheterization

Ultrasound technology has revolutionized the practice of safer vascular access, for both venous and arterial cannulation. The ability to visualize underlying structures of the chest, neck, and upper/lower extremities provides for greater success, speed, and safety with all vascular access procedures. Ultrasound not only yields superior procedural advantages but also provides a platform to perform a thorough assessment of the vascular structures to evaluate vessel health, viability, size, and patency, including the location of other important and best avoided anatomical structures-prior to performing any procedures. Such assessment is best performed using a systematic and standardized approach, as the Rapid Central Vein Assessment, described in this study.

Malposition of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter Into the Right Inferior Thyroid Vein: A Case Report

Patient: Female, 58

Final Diagnosis: Breast cancer

Symptoms: None

Medication: None

Clinical Procedure: Insertion of a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC)

Specialty: Anesthesiology

Is Routine Chest X-Ray After Ultrasound-Guided Central Venous Catheter Insertion Choosing Wisely?: A Population-Based Retrospective Study of 6,875 Patients

BACKGROUND

A routine chest radiograph (CXR) is recommended as a screening test after central venous catheter (CVC) insertion. The goal of this study was to assess the value of a routine postprocedural CXR in the era of ultrasound-guided CVC insertion.

METHODS

This population-based retrospective cohort study was performed to review the records of all adult patients who had a CVC inserted in the operating room in a tertiary institution between July 1, 2008, and December 31, 2015. We determined the incidence of pneumothorax and catheter misplacement after ultrasound-guided CVC insertion. A logistic regression analysis was performed to examine the potential risk factors associated with these complications, and a cost analysis was conducted to evaluate the economic impact.

RESULTS

Of 18,274 patients who had a CVC inserted, 6,875 patients were included. The overall incidence of pneumothorax and catheter misplacement was 0.33% (95% CI, 0.22-0.5) (23 patients) and 1.91% (95% CI, 1.61-2.26) (131 patients), respectively. The site of catheterization was the major determinant of pneumothorax and catheter misplacement; left subclavian vein catheterization was the site at a higher risk for pneumothorax (OR, 6.69 [95% CI, 2.45-18.28]; P < .001), and catheterization sites other than the right internal jugular vein were at a higher risk for catheter misplacement. Expenditures on routine postprocedural CXR were US $105,000 to $183,000 per year at our institution.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that pneumothorax and catheter misplacement after ultrasound-guided CVC insertion were rare, and the costs of a postprocedural CXR were exceedingly high. We concluded that a routine postprocedural CXR is unnecessary and not a wise choice in our setting.