Platelet hyperfunction is decreased by additional aspirin loading in patients presenting with myocardial infarction on daily aspirin therapy:

Clinical pharmacology of antiplatelet drugs

INTRODUCTION

Platelets play a key role in arterial thrombosis and antiplatelet therapy is pivotal in the treatment of cardiovascular disease. Current antiplatelet drugs target different pathways of platelet activation and show specific pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic characteristics, implicating clinically relevant drug-drug interactions.

AREAS COVERED

This article reviews the role of platelets in hemostasis and cardiovascular thrombosis, and discusses the key pharmacodynamics, drug-drug interactions and reversal strategies of clinically used antiplatelet drugs.

EXPERT OPINION

Antiplatelet therapies target distinct pathways of platelet activation: thromboxane A₂ synthesis, adenosine diphosphate-mediated signaling, integrin α_IIbβ₃ (GPIIb/IIIa), thrombin-mediated platelet activation via the PAR1 receptor and phosphodiesterases. Key clinical drug-drug interactions of antiplatelet agents involve acetylsalicylic acid - ibuprofen, clopidogrel - omeprazole, and morphine - oral P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, all of which lead to an attenuated antiplatelet effect. Platelet function and genetic testing and the use of scores (ARC-HBR, PRECISE-DAPT, ESC ischemic risk definition) may contribute to a more tailored antiplatelet therapy. High on-treatment platelet reactivity presents a key problem in the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). A treatment strategy involving early initiation of an intravenous antiplatelet agent may be able to bridge the gap of insufficient platelet inhibition in high ischemic risk patients with STEMI.

Morphine Interaction with Aspirin: a Double-Blind, Crossover Trial in Healthy Volunteers

Aspirin is a cornerstone in the antiplatelet therapy for acute coronary syndromes. Coadministration of morphine may potentially influence the intestinal absorption, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics, as seen with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors. In this trial, healthy volunteers were randomized to receive morphine (5 mg, i.v. bolus injection) at one of seven different time points before, after, or with aspirin (162 mg, p.o.) in a double-blind, placebo-controlled fashion. After a 14-day washout, subjects received placebo instead of morphine. Pharmacokinetics were determined by liquid chromatography, and aspirin's effects were measured by platelet function tests (whole-blood platelet aggregation: multiplate, platelet plug formation: PFA-100). Morphine increased the total acetylsalicylic acid exposure by 20% compared with placebo when given simultaneously with aspirin, whereas C_max and t_max were not altered. Morphine had no significant effect on aspirin-induced platelet inhibition. In contrast to coadministration with P2Y₁₂ inhibitors, morphine appears to have negligible interaction with aspirin.

Dose-dependent effect of early antiplatelet therapy in acute ischaemic stroke

Antiplatelet agents are essential in treating patients with acute ischaemic stroke (AIS) to prevent recurrent ischaemic events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of early antiplatelet therapy with different aspirin (ASA) dosages in patients with AIS. This observational study included 454 patients with AIS in whom antiplatelet treatment was initiated. The antiplatelet effect was determined by whole blood aggregometry within 48 hours after antplatelet therapy was initiated. An impedance change exceeding 0 Ω after stimulation with arachidonic acid was defined as ASA low response (ALR) and ≥5 Ω in ADP-stimulated specimen as clopidogrel LR. Of the study group 53.5% patients were treated with 200 mg ASA orally, 27.5% with 500 mg ASA intravenously, 8.6% with 100 mg ASA orally, and 7.7% with 75 mg clopidogrel. A dose-dependent antiplatelet effect of ASA treatment was found: 18.4% of patients with 500 mg ASA intravenously were ALR, in contrast to 32.5% on 200 mg and 35.9% on 100 mg ASA orally. Clopidogrel treatment without a loading dose resulted in a high proportion of LR (45.7%). Using the propensity score method revealed a three times higher risk for ALR for patients treated with ASA 200 mg [odds ratio 2.99 (1.55–5.79)] compared to treatment with ASA 500 mg. In conclusion, initiating antiplatelet therapy in patients with AIS resulted in a dose-dependent insufficient platelet inhibitory effect. Our findings suggest using a loading dose of 500 mg ASA intravenously as this seems to be favourable when a sufficient early platelet inhibitory effect is wanted.

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT01273935

Acetylsalicylic acid in critically ill patients: a cross-sectional and a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Despite decades of clinical use, the pharmacokinetics and the effects of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA) in critically ill patients remain ill-defined. We aimed to investigate the pharmacokinetics and the effects of different ASA formulations during critical illness.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study and a randomized, parallel-group trial were performed. Critically ill patients under chronic oral ASA treatment (100 mg enteric-coated) were screened for high 'on-treatment' platelet reactivity (HTPR) according to arachidonic acid-induced whole-blood aggregometry. Thirty patients with HTPR were randomized to receive 100 mg ASA intravenously, 100 mg enteric-coated ASA bid (bis in die) or 81 mg chewable ASA (n = 10 per group). Serum thromboxane B2 (TXB2) levels, ASA and salicylic acid levels were quantified.

RESULTS

Of 66 patients, 85% (95% confidence intervals 74-93%) had HTPR. Compared to baseline infusion of 100 mg, ASA significantly reduced platelet aggregation after 24 h to median 80% (Quartiles: 66-84%). Intake of 81 mg chewable ASA significantly reduced platelet aggregation to 75% (54-86%) after four hours, but increased it to 117% after 24 h (81-163%). Treatment with 100 mg enteric-coated ASA bid decreased platelet aggregation after 24 h to median 56% (52-113%). Baseline TXB2 levels were median 0·35 ng/mL (0·07-0·94). Infusion of ASA or intake of 100 mg ASA bid reduced TXB2 levels to 0·07-0·18 ng/mL after 24 h, respectively. Chewable ASA reduced TXB2 levels only transiently. Pharmacokinetic analysis revealed highly variable absorption patterns of oral ASA formulations.

CONCLUSION

There is a very high prevalence of HTPR in critically ill patients on peroral ASA therapy, caused by an incomplete suppression of TXB2 and/or by impaired absorption of ASA.

Abciximab as a bridging strategy to overcome morphine-prasugrel interaction in STEMI patients

OBJECTIVE

The present study investigated whether the glycoprotein (GP)IIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab might be a successful bridging strategy to achieve adequate levels of platelet inhibition rapidly in cases where prasugrel is used in morphine-pretreated ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) patients.

METHODS

In a prospective observational cohort study, 32 patients presenting with STEMI were given prasugrel at a loading dose of 60 mg. Patients were stratified into four groups, according to morphine and/or abciximab use. Adenosine diphosphate (ADP)-induced platelet aggregation was measured at four time points: at baseline, and at 2 h, 1 day and 2 days after prasugrel loading.

RESULTS

Morphine use was associated with a three-fold higher level of ADP-induced platelet aggregation 2 h after prasugrel loading compared with no morphine/no abciximab (P = 0.019). However, when abciximab was infused in the catheterization laboratory, the effect of morphine on ADP-induced platelet aggregation disappeared (P = 0.884). This interaction was also seen in the presence of high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) at 2 h; while HTPR was seen in 88% of morphine users/no abciximab users, it was found in only 17-20% in the three other groups (P = 0.003). The effect of morphine disappeared by day 1 - 2.

CONCLUSION

The infusion of the GPIIb/IIIa receptor blocker abciximab allows immediate and efficient platelet inhibition in STEMI patients concomitantly receiving the oral ADP receptor blocker prasugrel and morphine.

To Load or Not to Load? Aspirin Loading in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Study of Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Aspirin is known to reduce mortality and recurrent vascular events. However, there are no reports about the dose-response of loading aspirin in treating acute ischemic stroke. The objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of different loading doses of aspirin in acute ischemic stroke presenting within 48 hours of symptom onset.

METHODS

This was a retrospective, hospital-based cohort study. Patients were classified as high dose (160-325 mg) or low dose (<160 mg) based on the initial loading dose of aspirin at the emergency department. The primary outcome measure was a favorable modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score of 1 or lower on discharge. Secondary outcomes included in-hospital mortality, stroke progression during admission, and bleeding events. A propensity score with 1:3 matching was used to balance baseline characteristics, and stepwise multiple logistic regression was performed for variable adjustment.

RESULTS

From a total of 7738 available patients, 3802 patients were included. Among them, 750 patients were in the high-dose group. Multiple logistic regression after matching revealed that the high-dose group was significantly associated with a favorable clinical outcome on discharge (odds ratio: 1.49, 95% confidence interval: 1.17-1.89, P <.01), but not mortality or stroke progression. The high-dose group also experienced more minor bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS

A higher loading dose of aspirin (160-325 mg) can be beneficial in treating acute ischemic stroke, although there is an increased risk of minor bleeding.

Absorption kinetics of low-dose chewable aspirin--implications for acute coronary syndromes

BACKGROUND

This study describes the implications of the pharmacokinetics of low-dose chewable aspirin for acute coronary syndromes. Current guidelines recommend the administration of 162-325 mg aspirin chewing tablets for the treatment of acute myocardial infarction. Although aspirin is widely used and a cornerstone in myocardial infarction, there is no information available on the pharmacokinetics of low doses of chewable aspirin.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This prospective trial assessed the pharmacokinetics of acetylsalicylic acid and its metabolite salicylic acid after intake of 162 mg chewable low-dose aspirin in 35 healthy volunteers. Plasma drug and metabolite levels were analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography, and corresponding pharmacodynamics were determined by impedance aggregometry.

RESULTS

Acetylsalicylic acid was rapidly absorbed with a mean Tmax of 27 ± 8 min. Tmax of salicylic acid was 69 ± 21 min. Mean Cmax was 1·8 ± 0·6 mg/L and 7·6 ± 1·4 for acetylsalicylic acid and salicylic acid, respectively. Arachidonic acid-induced aggregation showed maximum platelet inhibition 30 min after drug ingestion.

CONCLUSIONS

The characterization of the plasma-time profile fills the gap between the lack of data on pharmacokinetics and the pharmacodynamics and the recommendation for using low-dose chewable aspirin for acute coronary syndromes. We describe for the first time that a 162-mg dose of chewable aspirin is rapidly absorbed and achieves plasma concentrations of the active metabolite salicylic acid required to maximally inhibit platelet aggregation. However, a 162-mg dose is truly a minimum, and doubling this dose might be better for patients with myocardial infarction.

The administration of a loading dose of aspirin to patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction while receiving chronic aspirin treatment reduces thromboxane A2-dependent platelet reactivity

Abstract The optimal dose of aspirin for patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) while receiving chronic aspirin therapy has not been clearly established. We evaluated whether continued treatment with 100 mg of aspirin or a loading dose (200-500 mg) influences thromboxane A2 (TX) suppression or platelet reactivity. Sixty-four consecutive patients with AMI and 98 healthy subjects (82 aspirin-free and 16 receiving 100 mg daily for a week) were evaluated. Treatment was at the discretion of the attending physician. Collagen (1 µg/ml)-induced TX synthesis, (14)C-serotonin-release, platelet aggregation, and the PFA-100 assay were evaluated. The platelet TX synthesis of patients receiving a loading dose of aspirin was sixfold lower than that of patients receiving 100 mg of aspirin (p<0.005). This was associated with marked reductions in (14)C-serotonin-release and arachidonic-acid-induced aggregation and an increase in the PFA-100 closure time (p<0.01). Categorization of patients according to their TX synthesis (<95% or ≥ 95% inhibition vs. healthy aspirin-free subjects) revealed that 8% of the patients treated with loading doses had a poor response (<95% inhibition) vs. 53% of those treated with 100 mg (p<0.001). Patients with lower TX inhibition had higher serum NT-Pro-BNP (p<0.005), a marker of poor left ventricular systolic function. Administration of a loading dose of aspirin to patients with AMI during existing chronic aspirin treatment induced greater reductions in platelet TX synthesis and TX-dependent platelet reactivity than the continued treatment alone.

Effects of prasugrel on platelet inhibition during systemic endotoxaemia: a randomized controlled trial

P2Y12 receptor antagonists have become a mainstay for the treatment of CVD (cardiovascular diseases). However, they have rarely been evaluated under pathophysiological conditions apart from arterial diseases. We hypothesized interactions between prasugrel and enhanced vWF (von Willebrand Factor) release in a model of systemic inflammation, and compared the pharmacodynamic effects of prasugrel against placebo on agonist-induced platelet aggregation and shear-induced platelet plug formation. A total of 20 healthy male volunteers were enrolled in a double-blind placebo-controlled two-way crossover trial. Each volunteer received either placebo or a 60 mg loading dose of prasugrel 2 h before endotoxin or placebo infusion. Platelet inhibition was measured with MEA (multiple electrode aggregometry), the PFA-100 system and the VASP (vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein) phosphorylation assay. Prasugrel blunted various platelet aggregation pathways, including those induced by ADP (−81%), AA (arachidonic acid) (−60%), ristocetin (−75%; P<0.001 for all) and, to a lesser degree, collagen or TRAP (thrombin-receptor-activating peptide). Prasugrel decreased shear-induced platelet plug formation, but vWF release during endotoxaemia partly antagonized the inhibitory effect of prasugrel as measured with the PFA-100 system. Endotoxaemia acutely decreased ristocetin and TRAP-induced platelet aggregation, and enhanced ristocetin-induced aggregation after 24 h. Strong in vivo blockade of P2Y12 inhibits a broad spectrum of platelet aggregation pathways. However, vWF release may reduce prasugrel's effects under high-shear conditions.

Incomplete inhibition of platelet function as assessed by the platelet function analyzer (PFA-100) identifies a subset of cardiovascular patients with high residual platelet response while on aspirin

Sixty-six patients with a history of ischemic events (myocardial infarction, unstable angina, or stroke) on chronic aspirin therapy were studied by different platelet function tests: 37 patients had suffered a recurrent event while on aspirin and 29 were without recurrences. Based on results from light transmission aggregometry (LTA) induced by arachidonic acid (AA) and serum TxB(2) both COX-1-dependent methods, only one patient could be identified as aspirin "resistant". However, when methods only partially-dependent on platelet COX-1 activity were considered, the prevalence of aspirin non-responders ranged, according to the different tests, from 0 to 52%. No difference was observed between patients with recurrences and those without. Among patients with recurrent events, those with an incomplete inhibition of platelet function, as assessed by the PFA-100, had significantly higher residual serum TxB(2) (2.4 ± 2.4 ng/mL vs 0.4 ± 0.1 ng/mL, p = 0.03), residual LTA-AA (9.2 ± 10.6% vs 2.0 ± 1.6%, p = 0.008), LTA-Coll (49.3 ± 14.6% vs 10.2 ± 8.3%, p = 0.007) and LTA-ADP (50.9 ± 16.2% vs 34.3 ± 11.0%, p = 0.04). In conclusion, laboratory tests solely exploring the AA-mediated pathway of platelet function, while being the most appropriate to detect the effect of aspirin on its pharmacologic target (platelet COX-1), may fail to reveal the functional interactions between minimal residual TxA(2) and additional stimuli or primers potentially leading to aspirin-insensitive platelet aggregation. High residual platelet response in platelet function tests only partially dependent on COX-1 may reveal a condition of persistent platelet reactivity in a subset of aspirin-treated patients characterizing them as a subgroup at higher vascular risk.