Desmoid tumors: who, when and how to treat?

Active surveillance and emerging medical treatment options for desmoid: when and for whom?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article discusses the evolving approaches to desmoid tumors management, shedding light on recent developments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Active surveillance has become the primary approach for managing primary peripheral desmoid tumors. This strategy was initially based on evidence from retrospective studies. Roughly 50% of cases managed with active surveillance show spontaneous stabilization or regression. Recent prospective trials conducted in Italy, The Netherlands, and France (2022-2023) confirm the efficacy of active surveillance, revealing 3-year progression-free survival rates ranging from 53.4 to 58%. For the patients under active surveillance, decisions regarding treatment are based on significant tumor growth or progressive symptoms. Moreover, three contemporary randomized trials investigated medical treatments for progressive or recurrent desmoid tumors. Sorafenib, pazopanib, and nirogacestat demonstrated clinical activity, as evidenced by favorable progression-free survival and objective response rates.

SUMMARY

Active surveillance has solidified its position as the primary management approach for desmoid tumors, validated by three robust prospective studies. Three recent randomized trials explored medical treatment for progressive or recurrent desmoid tumors, revealing promising clinical activities.

Surgery combined with anlotinib for local control of patients with resectable extremity desmoid fibromatosis: a retrospective study

Background: Desmoid fibromatosis (DF) is a pathological intermediate fibroblastoma that is difficult to control locally due to its invasive nature, especially in the extremities. Although anlotinib demonstrated efficacy in treating DF with tolerable safety, the impact of surgical intervention in conjunction with anlotinib administration on local control in patients with extremity DF remains undetermined. Methods: We conducted a retrospective examination of the clinical medical documentation belonging to patients with resectable DF of the extremities who were treated with surgery between January 2010 and June 2022. The patients were divided into two cohorts: surgery alone cohort and surgery combined with anlotinib group (surgery plus anlotinib cohort), crossover to surgery plus anlotinib cohort was admissible for patients in the surgery alone cohort who experienced disease recurrence postoperatively. Clinical data such as basic information, tumor location, anlotinib toxicity, time to recurrence, surgical complications, follow-up time, visual analogue scale (VAS) score and Musculoskeletal Tumor Society (MSTS) score at the last follow-up were collected. Results: In total, 48 consecutive patients (19 males and 29 females) with resectable DF of the extremities, including 25 patients in the surgery alone cohort, 23 patients in the surgery plus anlotinib cohort, and 10 patients who were transferred from the surgery alone cohort to the surgery plus anlotinib cohort. The VAS score at the last follow-up was 5 (IQR, 3-6) in the surgery alone cohort and 2 (IQR, 1-3) in the surgery plus anlotinib cohort, respectively; the MSTS score at the last follow-up was 19 (IQR, 16.5-24) in the surgery alone cohort and 27 (IQR, 25-28) in the surgery plus anlotinib cohort, respectively; these characteristics were statistically different between the two cohorts. The 3-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of the surgery alone cohort and the surgery plus anlotinib cohort were 37.7% and 72.6%, respectively, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.022). Conclusion: Surgery combined with anlotinib appears to be effective in controlling local recurrence in patients with resectable DF of the extremities, and the side effects were acceptable.

Gynecological sarcomas, surgical management: primary, metastatic, and recurrent disease

Adult-type gynecological soft tissue and visceral sarcomas are rare tumors, with an estimated incidence of 13% of all sarcomas and 4% of all gynecological malignancies. They most often develop in the uterus (83%), followed by the ovaries (8%), vulva and vagina (5%), and other gynecological organs (2%). The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the current management of gynecological sarcomas, according to international guidelines. The management of gynecological sarcomas should follow the recommendations for the management of soft tissue and visceral sarcomas. Centralizing cases in expert centers improves patient survival, both for the diagnostic phase and for multidisciplinary therapeutic management. In the case of pelvic soft tissue sarcomas, a radiological biopsy is essential before any surgical decision is taken. In the case of a myometrial tumour which may correspond to a sarcoma, if conservative surgery such as myomectomy or morcellation is planned, an ultrasound-guided biopsy with pathological analysis including comparative genomic hybridization analysis must be carried out. In all cases, en bloc surgery, without rupture, is mandatory. Many rare histological subtypes require specific surgical management.

Radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases: benefits and long-term risks

PURPOSE

The discovery of X-rays was followed by a variety of attempts to treat infectious diseases and various other non-cancer diseases with ionizing radiation, in addition to cancer. There has been a recent resurgence of interest in the use of such radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases. Non-cancer diseases for which use of radiotherapy has currently been proposed include refractory ventricular tachycardia, neurodegenerative diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease and dementia), and Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pneumonia, all with ongoing clinical studies that deliver radiation doses of 0.5-25 Gy in a single fraction or in multiple daily fractions. In addition to such non-cancer effects, historical indications predominantly used in some countries (e.g. Germany) include osteoarthritis and degenerative diseases of the bones and joints. This narrative review gives an overview of the biological rationale and ongoing preclinical and clinical studies for radiotherapy proposed for various non-cancer diseases, discusses the plausibility of the proposed biological rationale, and considers the long-term radiation risks of cancer and non-cancer diseases.

CONCLUSIONS

A growing body of evidence has suggested that radiation represents a double-edged sword, not only for cancer, but also for non-cancer diseases. At present, clinical evidence has shown some beneficial effects of radiotherapy for ventricular tachycardia, but there is little or no such evidence of radiotherapy for other newly proposed non-cancer diseases (e.g. Alzheimer's disease, COVID-19 pneumonia). Patients with ventricular tachycardia and COVID-19 pneumonia have thus far been treated with radiotherapy when they are an urgent life threat with no efficient alternative treatment, but some survivors may encounter a paradoxical situation where patients were rescued by radiotherapy but then get harmed by radiotherapy. Further studies are needed to justify the clinical use of radiotherapy for non-cancer diseases, and optimize dose to diseased tissue while minimizing dose to healthy tissue.

Initial Active Surveillance Strategy for Patients with Peripheral Sporadic Primary Desmoid-Type Fibromatosis: A Multicentric Phase II Observational Trial

BACKGROUND

Stabilization or spontaneous regressions are demonstrated in more than half of patients affected by primary desmoid-type fibromatosis (DF) in retrospective studies. The objective of this phase II study was to prospectively assess the behavior of primary sporadic DT managed by active surveillance (AS).

METHODS

This prospective, multicenter, observational study (NCT01801176) included patients ≥18 years of age with primary sporadic DF located in an extremity or the abdominal/thoracic wall. At inclusion, all patients were initially placed on AS. Follow-up was based on clinical and radiological evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) performed at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months, and then every 6 months for 3 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) at 3 years according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, as evaluated by a Central Review Board.

RESULTS

Between 2012 and 2015, 100 patients were enrolled. The female/male ratio was 8 and the median age was 34 years (interquartile range [IQR] 30.8-43.9). Median follow-up was 46.6 months (IQR 36.8-61.1) and the 3-year PFS was 53.4% (95% confidence interval 43.5-63.1%). At progression (48 patients), 23 patients received active treatment. Fifty-eight patients (58%) presented with spontaneous tumor regression (decrease > 0% compared with the initial size) during the first 3 months (n = 35, 35%) or after an initial progression (n = 23, 23%), of whom 26 (26%) had partial responses (PRs). The median time to PR was 31.7 months (25.3-not available).

CONCLUSIONS

These data support the use of AS as the primary approach to select patients with peripheral DF who require aggressive treatment.

Case Report: Desmoid tumor response to magnetic resonance-guided high intensity focused ultrasound over 4 years

Desmoid tumors are a rare form of cancer, which show locally aggressive invasion of surrounding tissues and may occur anywhere in the body. Treatment options comprise conservative watch and wait strategies as tumors may show spontaneous regression as well as surgical resection, radiation therapy, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID), chemotherapy, or local thermoablative approaches for progressive disease. The latter comprises cryotherapy, radiofrequency, microwave ablation, or thermal ablation with high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) as the only entirely non-invasive option. This report presents a case where a desmoid tumor at the left dorsal humerus was 2 times surgically resected and, after recurrence, thermally ablated with HIFU under magnetic resonance image-guidance (MR-HIFU). In our report, we analyze tumor volume and/or pain score during standard of care (2 years) and after HIFU treatment over a 4-year follow-up period. Results showed MR-HIFU treatment led to complete tumor remission and pain response.