1
|
Kanzawa-Lee G, Krauss JC, Knoerl R. Exploring Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Management Practice Patterns Among Oncology Clinicians. Semin Oncol Nurs 2024:151685. [PMID: 38937199 DOI: 10.1016/j.soncn.2024.151685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2024] [Revised: 05/09/2024] [Accepted: 05/22/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Approximately 60% of cancer survivors receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy experience chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) (eg, hand and foot numbness, tingling, or pain). There is only one recommended pharmacological treatment (duloxetine) and one modestly beneficial nonpharmacological treatment (exercise) for CIPN. However, data suggest national guideline recommendations are not routinely practiced. Further, less is known about nurses' CIPN management practices. The purpose of this convergent mixed methods study was to explore oncology clinicians' self-reported practices and perceptions regarding CIPN prevention and management. METHODS Oncology clinicians at three cancer centers completed a survey about their recommendations for CIPN prevention and management in practice. A subset of clinicians also participated in a semi-structured interview to explore their perspectives of and motivations for implementing CIPN assessment, prevention, and management in practice. Quantitative data were described (eg, frequency or median) and qualitative data were analyzed using inductive content analysis. RESULTS This study (N = 44 survey responses; n = 9 interviews) resulted in four themes: (1) clinicians primarily recommend gabapentin for CIPN management and often observe cryotherapy used for CIPN prevention, but these interventions are complicated by discomfort, intolerable side effects, and efficacy concerns; (2) clinicians perceive CIPN as troublesome and desire additional information and resources regarding CIPN prevention and management; (3) CIPN-related education provided by clinicians may be limited by patient retention of the amount of education received about cancer treatment and other factors; (4) clinicians use subjective CIPN assessment to screen at each visit for common CIPN symptoms (eg, numbness or tingling) and the impact of symptoms on day-to-day activities. CONCLUSIONS Discrepancies persist between evidence-based guidelines on CIPN management and current oncology clinician practices. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE Clinician involvement is needed when developing education and resources to help oncology clinicians provide the most evidence-based care to potentially prevent and manage their patients' CIPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John C Krauss
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Robert Knoerl
- School of Nursing, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rouleau G, Wu K, Ramamoorthi K, Boxall C, Liu RH, Maloney S, Zelmer J, Scott T, Larsen D, Wijeysundera HC, Ziegler D, Bhatia S, Kishimoto V, Steele Gray C, Desveaux L. Mapping Theories, Models, and Frameworks to Evaluate Digital Health Interventions: Scoping Review. J Med Internet Res 2024; 26:e51098. [PMID: 38315515 PMCID: PMC10877497 DOI: 10.2196/51098] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Revised: 11/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/27/2023] [Indexed: 02/07/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are a central focus of health care transformation efforts, yet their uptake in practice continues to fall short of their potential. In order to achieve their desired outcomes and impact, DHIs need to reach their target population and need to be used. Many factors can rapidly intersect between this dynamic of users and interventions. The application of theories, models, and frameworks (TMFs) can facilitate the systematic understanding and explanation of the complex interactions between users, practices, technology, and health system factors that underpin research questions. There remains a gap in our understanding of how TMFs have been applied to guide the evaluation of DHIs with real-world health system operations. OBJECTIVE This study aims to map TMFs used in studies to guide the evaluation of DHIs. The objectives are to (1) describe the TMFs and the constructs they target, (2) identify how TMFs have been prospectively used (ie, their roles) in primary studies to evaluate DHIs, and (3) to reflect on the relevance and utility of our findings for knowledge users. METHODS This scoping review was conducted in partnership with knowledge users using an integrated knowledge translation approach. We included papers (eg, reports; empirical quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods studies; conference proceedings; and dissertations) if primary insights resulting from the application of TMFs were presented. Any type of DHI was eligible. Papers published from 2000 and onward were mainly identified from the following databases: MEDLINE (Ovid), CINAHL Complete (EBSCOhost), PsycINFO (Ovid), EBM Reviews (Ovid), and Embase (Ovid). RESULTS A total of 156 studies published between 2000 and 2022 were included. A total of 68 distinct TMFs were identified across 85 individual studies. In more than half (85/156, 55%) of the included studies, 1 of following 6 prevailing TMFs were reported: Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (n=39); the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance Framework (n=17); the Technology of Acceptance Model (n=16); the Unified Theory on Acceptance and Use of Technology (n=12); the Diffusion of Innovation Theory (n=10); and Normalization Process Theory (n=9). The most common intended roles of the 6 TMFs were to inform data collection (n=86), to inform data analysis (n=69), and to identify key constructs that may serve as barriers and facilitators (n=52). CONCLUSIONS As TMFs are most often reported to be applied to support data collection and analysis, researchers should consider more clearly synthesizing key insights as practical use cases to both increase the relevance and digestibility of their findings. There is also a need to adapt or develop guidelines for better reporting DHIs and the use of TMFs to guide evaluation. Hence, it would contribute to ensuring ongoing technology transformation efforts are evidence and theory informed rather than anecdotally driven.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geneviève Rouleau
- Nursing department, Université du Québec en Outaouais, Saint-Jérôme, QC, Canada
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institut du Savoir Montfort, Montfort Hospital, Ottawa, ON, Canada
| | - Kelly Wu
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Karishini Ramamoorthi
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Cherish Boxall
- Southampton Clinical Trials Unit, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Rebecca H Liu
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | | | - Ted Scott
- School of Nursing, Hamilton Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada
| | - Darren Larsen
- Telus Healthcare Delivery, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Women's College Hospital Family Health Team, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | | - Daniela Ziegler
- Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Sacha Bhatia
- Ontario Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Peter Munk Cardiac Centre, University Health Network, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Vanessa Kishimoto
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Carolyn Steele Gray
- Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute, Sinai Health, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Laura Desveaux
- Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care Toronto, Women's College Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
- Institute for Better Health, Trillium Health Partners, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Knoerl R, Mazzola E, Hong F, Salehi E, McCleary N, Ligibel J, Reyes K, Berry DL. Exploring the impact of a decision support algorithm to improve clinicians' chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment and management practices: a two-phase, longitudinal study. BMC Cancer 2021; 21:236. [PMID: 33676431 PMCID: PMC7937225 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-021-07965-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 02/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) negatively affects physical function and chemotherapy dosing, yet, clinicians infrequently document CIPN assessment and/or adhere to evidence-based CIPN management in practice. The primary aims of this two-phase, pre-posttest study were to explore the impact of a CIPN clinician decision support algorithm on clinicians' frequency of CIPN assessment documentation and adherence to evidence-based management. METHODS One hundred sixty-two patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy (e.g., taxanes, platinums, or bortezomib) answered patient-reported outcome measures on CIPN severity and interference prior to three clinic visits at breast, gastrointestinal, or multiple myeloma outpatient clinics (n = 81 usual care phase [UCP], n = 81 algorithm phase [AP]). During the AP, study staff delivered a copy of the CIPN assessment and management algorithm to clinicians (N = 53) prior to each clinic visit. Changes in clinicians' CIPN assessment documentation (i.e., index of numbness, tingling, and/or CIPN pain documentation) and adherence to evidence-based management at the third clinic visit were compared between the AP and UCP using Pearson's chi-squared test. RESULTS Clinicians' frequency of adherence to evidence-based CIPN management was higher in the AP (29/52 [56%]) than the UCP (20/46 [43%]), but the change was not statistically significant (p = 0.31). There were no improvements in clinicians' CIPN assessment frequency during the AP (assessment index = 0.5440) in comparison to during the UCP (assessment index = 0.6468). CONCLUSIONS Implementation of a clinician-decision support algorithm did not significantly improve clinicians' CIPN assessment documentation or adherence to evidence-based management. Further research is needed to develop theory-based implementation interventions to bolster the frequency of CIPN assessment and use of evidence-based management strategies in practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT03514680 . Registered 21 April 2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Emanuele Mazzola
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Fangxin Hong
- Department of Biostatistics and Computational Biology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Elahe Salehi
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nadine McCleary
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Kaitlen Reyes
- Medical Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Donna L Berry
- Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Informatics, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an unsolved and potentially life-compromising problem for most patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. It manifests with numbness, tingling, and possibly neuropathic pain and motor and autonomic symptoms. This review aims to provide an evidence synthesis that prepares nurses to comprehensively assess, provide supportive care for, and critically evaluate the literature on CIPN. The prevalence, significance, characteristics, mechanisms, and risk factors of CIPN will be discussed, as well as nursing-relevant evidence on the assessment, prevention, and management of CIPN. The importance of critical literature evaluation before clinical implementation to reduce physical and financial harms to patients will also be highlighted.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ibrahim EY, Ehrlich BE. Prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A review of recent findings. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2020; 145:102831. [PMID: 31783290 PMCID: PMC6982645 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2019.102831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2019] [Revised: 11/04/2019] [Accepted: 11/05/2019] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is an adverse effect of chemotherapy that is frequently experienced by patients receiving treatment for cancer. CIPN is caused by many of the most commonly used chemotherapeutic agents, including taxanes, vinca alkaloids, and bortezomib. Pain and sensory abnormalities may persist for months, or even years after the cessation of chemotherapy. The management of CIPN is a significant challenge, as it is not possible to predict which patients will develop symptoms, the timing for the appearance of symptoms can develop anytime during the chemotherapy course, there are no early indications that warrant a reduction in the dosage to halt CIPN progression, and there are no drugs approved to prevent or alleviate CIPN. This review focuses on the etiology of CIPN and will highlight the various approaches developed for prevention and treatment. The goal is to guide studies to identify, test, and standardize approaches for managing CIPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eiman Y Ibrahim
- Departments of Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| | - Barbara E Ehrlich
- Departments of Pharmacology and Cellular and Molecular Physiology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Laufer T, Lerner B, Petrich A, Quinn AM, Ernst L, Roop A, Knoblauch J, Leasure NC, Jaslow RJ, Hegarty S, Leader A, Barsevick A. Evaluation of a Technology-Based Survivor Care Plan for Breast Cancer Survivors: Pre-Post Pilot Study. JMIR Cancer 2019; 5:e12090. [PMID: 31859683 PMCID: PMC6942181 DOI: 10.2196/12090] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/06/2018] [Revised: 05/21/2019] [Accepted: 09/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Background As of 2016, almost 16 million individuals were cancer survivors, including over 3.5 million survivors of breast cancer. Because cancer survivors are living longer and have unique health care needs, the Institute of Medicine proposed a survivor care plan as a way to alleviate the many medical, emotional, and care coordination problems of survivors. Objective This pilot study for breast cancer survivors was undertaken to: (1) examine self-reported changes in knowledge, confidence, and activation from before receipt to after receipt of a survivor care plan; and (2) describe survivor preferences for, and satisfaction with, a technology-based survivor care plan. Methods A single group pretest-posttest design was used to study breast cancer survivors in an academic cancer center and a community cancer center during their medical visit after they completed chemotherapy. The intervention was a technology-based survivor care plan. Measures were taken before, immediately after, and 1 month after receipt of the survivor care plan. Results A total of 38 breast cancer survivors agreed to participate in the study. Compared to baseline levels before receipt of the survivor care plan, participants reported increased knowledge both immediately after its receipt at the academic center (P<.001) and the community center (P<.001) as well as one month later at the academic center (P=.002) and the community center (P<.001). Participants also reported increased confidence immediately following receipt of the survivor care plan at the academic center (P=.63) and the community center (P=.003) and one month later at both the academic center (P=.63) and the community center (P<.001). Activation was increased from baseline to post-survivor care plan at both the academic center (P=.05) and community center (P<.001) as well as from baseline to 1-month follow-up at the academic center (P=.56) and the community center (P<.001). Overall, community center participants had lower knowledge, confidence, and activation at baseline compared with academic center participants. Overall, 22/38 (58%) participants chose the fully functional electronic survivor care plan. However, 12/23 (52%) in the community center group chose the paper version compared to 4/15 (27%) in the academic center group. Satisfaction with the format (38/38 participants) and the content (37/38 participants) of the survivor care plan was high for both groups. Conclusions This study provides evidence that knowledge, confidence, and activation of survivors were associated with implementation of the survivor care plan. This research agrees with previous research showing that cancer survivors found the technology-based survivor care plan to be acceptable. More research is needed to determine the optimal approach to survivor care planning to ensure that all cancer survivors can benefit from it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Talya Laufer
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Bryan Lerner
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Anett Petrich
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Anna M Quinn
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Leah Ernst
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Alicin Roop
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Janet Knoblauch
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Nick C Leasure
- McGlinn Cancer Institute, Reading Health System, West Reading, PA, United States
| | - Rebecca J Jaslow
- Department of Medical Oncology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Sarah Hegarty
- Division of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Amy Leader
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| | - Andrea Barsevick
- Division of Population Science, Department of Medical Oncology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
van Egdom LSE, Oemrawsingh A, Verweij LM, Lingsma HF, Koppert LB, Verhoef C, Klazinga NS, Hazelzet JA. Implementing Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Clinical Breast Cancer Care: A Systematic Review. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2019; 22:1197-1226. [PMID: 31563263 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2019.04.1927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2018] [Revised: 02/11/2019] [Accepted: 04/16/2019] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are increasingly being used to improve care delivery and are becoming part of routine clinical practice. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to give an overview of PROM administration methods and their facilitators and barriers in breast cancer clinical practice. METHODS A systematic literature search was conducted in Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central, CINAHL, and Web of Science for potentially relevant articles from study inception to November 2017. Reference lists of screened reviews were also checked. After inclusion of relevant articles, data were extracted and appraised by 2 investigators. RESULTS A total of 2311 articles were screened, of which 34 eligible articles were ultimately included. Method and frequency of PROM collection varied between studies. The majority of studies described a promising effect of PROM collection on patients (adherence, symptom distress, quality of life, acceptability, and satisfaction), providers (willingness to comply, clinical decision making, symptom management), and care process or system outcomes (referrals, patient-provider communication, hospital visits). A limited number of facilitators and barriers were identified, primarily of a technical and behavioral nature. CONCLUSION Although interpreting the impact of PROM collection in breast cancer care is challenging owing to considerations of synergistic (multicomponent) interventions and generalizability issues, this review found that systematic PROM collection has a promising impact on patients, providers, and care processes/ systems. Further standardization and reporting on method and frequency of PROM collection might help increase the effectiveness of PROM interventions and is warranted to enhance their overall impact.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Arvind Oemrawsingh
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Lisanne M Verweij
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Hester F Lingsma
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Linetta B Koppert
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Niek S Klazinga
- Department of Public Health, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jan A Hazelzet
- Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Knoerl R, Weller E, Halpenny B, Berry D. Exploring the efficacy of an electronic symptom assessment and self-care intervention to preserve physical function in individuals receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. BMC Cancer 2018; 18:1203. [PMID: 30514351 PMCID: PMC6278100 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-018-5093-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/14/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Impaired physical function due to chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) symptoms may lead to diminished quality of life. However, even with the knowledge of the effects of CIPN on physical function, clinicians infrequently assess and manage CIPN. Interventions that prioritize the early identification of CIPN to provide prompt treatment may reduce the impact of CIPN on physical function. The purpose of this paper is to compare self-reported physical function in individuals receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy between Electronic Symptom Assessment-Cancer (ESRA-C) intervention group (e.g., opportunity for symptom screening, self-care recommendations, communication coaching, and symptom tracking) and control group participants (i.e., electronic assessment alone). Secondary outcomes include pain intensity, sensory/motor CIPN, depression, fatigue, and insomnia. Methods The data used in this paper are a subset of a randomized controlled trial that examined the impact of the ESRA-C intervention on symptom distress in individuals receiving cancer treatment. Since the interest in this analysis is on the effects of neurotoxic chemotherapy on physical function, subjects were included if they received platinum and/or taxane-based chemotherapy and completed the baseline and end-of-treatment measures. Participants completed standardized questionnaires of physical function, CIPN, fatigue, depression, pain intensity, and insomnia prior to treatment, 3–6 weeks after treatment initiation, and after the completion of treatment. Changes in mean scores are compared between groups using linear mixed models adjusting for age. Results Intervention group participants reported significantly less reduction in physical functioning (baseline: 87.4/100; end-of-treatment: 84.5/100) relative to the control (baseline: 90.2/100; end-of-treatment: 81.8/100) (p = 0.011). For secondary measures, significantly less depression (p = 0.005) was observed in the intervention group as compared to the control, but otherwise, there were no between-group differences. Among participants who received high cumulative doses of neurotoxic chemotherapy, the intervention group reported significantly less severe sensory (p = 0.007) and motor CIPN (p = 0.039) relative to the control. Conclusion Use of the ESRA-C intervention led to less reduction in physical function in comparison to the control in individuals receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy. Further research is needed to confirm our findings and to identify how electronic symptom assessment technology may mediate physical function preservation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT00852852. Registered 27 February 2009.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Knoerl
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, LW 517, Boston, MA, 02215, USA.
| | - Edie Weller
- Biostatistics and Research Design Core, Institutional Centers for Clinical and Translational Research, Boston Children's Hospital, 21 Autumn Street Suite 313, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Barbara Halpenny
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, LW 521, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | - Donna Berry
- Phyllis F. Cantor Center for Research in Nursing and Patient Care Services, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 450 Brookline Avenue, LW 518, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Knoerl R, Bridges C, Smith G, Yang J, Kanzawa-Lee G, Smith E. Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: Use of an Electronic Care Planning System to Improve Adherence to Recommended Assessment and Management Practices. Clin J Oncol Nurs 2018; 22:E134-E140. [DOI: 10.1188/18.cjon.e134-e140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
|
10
|
Knoerl R, Lee D, Yang J, Bridges C, Kanzawa-Lee G, Lita Smith G, Lavoie Smith EM. Examining the Impact of a Web-Based Intervention to Promote Patient Activation in Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment and Management. JOURNAL OF CANCER EDUCATION : THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION FOR CANCER EDUCATION 2018; 33:1027-1035. [PMID: 28265863 DOI: 10.1007/s13187-017-1200-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Lack of activation in self-care can compromise a patient's ability to monitor and manage cancer treatment-related side effects, such as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). The web-based Carevive® Care Planning System (CPS) was developed to promote evidence-based symptom assessment and treatment by enhancing patients' involvement in their own care. The purpose of this single-arm, pre-test/post-test, prospective study was to examine whether the CPS can promote patient activation in CIPN symptom assessment and management. Seventy-five women with breast cancer receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy were recruited from a Comprehensive Cancer Center. Using standardized neuropathy measures embedded within the CPS, patients reported their CIPN symptoms over three consecutive clinical visits and completed the Patient Activation Measure (PAM) at the first and third visits. Mean changes in PAM scores between visits were compared using repeated measure analysis of covariance, adjusting for age. At baseline, patients were diagnosed with cancer within the past year (94.7%), highly activated (85% Level III/IV), and had a mean age of 51.3. PAM scores improved significantly from 67.15 (SD = 13.5; range = 47-100) at visit one to 69.29 (SD = 16.18; range = 47-100) (p = 0.02) (n = 62) at visit three. However, patients perceived the CPS to be of minimal value because it solely focused on CIPN and, for many, CIPN was not severe enough to motivate them to seek out symptom management information. Further research is needed to assess the utility of the CPS in promoting activation in the assessment and management of varying cancer treatment-related symptoms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert Knoerl
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA.
| | - Deborah Lee
- Michigan State University College of Nursing, East Lansing, MI, USA
| | - James Yang
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Celia Bridges
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - Grace Kanzawa-Lee
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| | - G Lita Smith
- University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Ellen M Lavoie Smith
- University of Michigan School of Nursing, 400 N. Ingalls, Ann Arbor, MI, 48109, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common, frequently chronic condition characterized by pain and decreased function. Given the growing number of cancer survivors and an increasing recognition of opioid therapy limitations, there is a need for critical analysis of the literature in directing an informed and thoughtful approach for the management of painful CIPN. RECENT FINDINGS A PubMed search for 'chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy AND pain' identifies 259 publications between 1 January 2016 and 31 March 2017. Based on review of this literature, we aim to present a clinically relevant update of painful CIPN. Notably, the use of duloxetine as a first-line agent in treatment of CIPN is confirmed. Moreover, clinical trials focus on nonpharmacologic strategies for managing painful CIPN. SUMMARY Despite the volume of recent publications, there are limited preventive or therapeutic strategies for CIPN supported by high-level evidence. Duloxetine remains the only pharmacologic agent with demonstrated benefit; its clinical use should be routinely considered. Moving forward, nonopioid analgesic therapies will likely play an increasing role in CIPN treatment, but further research is necessary to confirm their utility. Promising therapies include vitamin B12 supplementation, physical therapy, and various forms of neuromodulation.
Collapse
|
12
|
Electronic versus paper-pencil methods for assessing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Support Care Cancer 2017; 25:3437-3446. [PMID: 28577231 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-017-3764-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/12/2017] [Accepted: 05/22/2017] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE The aim of this study is to examine and compare with the validated, paper/pencil European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Scale (QLQ-CIPN20), the psychometric properties of three electronically administered patient reported outcome (PRO) measures of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN): (1) the two neuropathy items from the National Cancer Institute's Patient-Reported Outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE), (2) the QLQ-CIPN20, and (3) the 0-10 Neuropathy Screening Question (NSQ). METHODS We employed a descriptive, cross-sectional design and recruited 25 women with breast cancer who were receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy at an academic hospital. Participants completed the paper/pencil QLQ-CIPN20 and electronic versions of the QLQ-CIPN20, PRO-CTCAE, and NSQ. Internal consistency reliability, intraclass correlation, and concurrent and discriminant validity analyses were conducted. RESULTS The alpha coefficients for the electronic QLQ-CIPN20 sensory and motor subscales were 0.76 and 0.75. Comparison of the electronic and paper/pencil QLQ-CIPN20 subscales supported mode equivalence (intraclass correlation range >0.91). Participants who reported the presence of numbness/tingling via the single-item NSQ reported higher mean QLQ-CIPN20 sensory subscale scores (p < 0.001). PRO-CTCAE neuropathy severity and interference items correlated well with the QLQ-CIPN20 electronic and paper/pencil sensory (r = 0.76; r = 0.70) and motor (r = 0.55; r = 0.62) subscales, and with the NSQ (r = 0.72; r = 0.44). CONCLUSION These data support the validity of the electronically administered PRO-CTCAE neuropathy items, NSQ, and QLQ-CIPN20 for neuropathy screening in clinical practice. The electronic and paper/pencil versions of the QLQ-CIPN can be used interchangeably based on evidence of mode equivalence.
Collapse
|