1
|
Knisely A, Wu CF, Kanbergs A, Agusti N, Jorgensen KA, Melamed A, Giordano SH, Rauh-Hain JA, Nitecki Wilke R. Racial and sociodemographic disparities in the use of targeted therapies in advanced ovarian cancer patients with Medicare. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024:ijgc-2024-005599. [PMID: 39084695 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2024-005599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To describe sociodemographic and racial disparities in receipt of poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) and bevacizumab among insured patients with ovarian cancer. METHODS This retrospective study used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database to identify patients with advanced stage, high grade serous ovarian cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome of interest was receipt of PARPi or bevacizumab at any time after diagnosis. χ2 tests were used to compare categorical variables. Factors independently associated with the receipt of PARPi and/or bevacizumab were identified using a multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS The cohort included 6242 patients; 276 (4.4%) received PARPi, 2142 (34.3%) received bevacizumab, and 389 (6.2%) received both. Receipt of either targeted treatment increased over the study period. On univariate analysis, patients who received either targeted therapy were younger (63% vs 48% aged <75 years; p<0.001), had a lower comorbidity index (86% vs 80% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0-1; p<0.001), and higher socioeconomic status (74% vs 71% high socioeconomic status; p=0.047) compared with those who did not receive targeted therapy. In the multivariable model, non-Hispanic black patients were less likely than non-Hispanic white patients to receive either targeted therapy (odds ratio 0.77; 95% confidence interval 0.61 to 0.98; p=0.032). Older patients (aged >74 years) were also less likely to receive PARPi or bevacizumab compared with those aged 65-69 years (all p<0.001). CONCLUSION Sociodemographic and racial disparities exist in receipt of PARPi and bevacizumab among patients with advanced ovarian cancer insured by Medicare. As targeted therapies become more commonly used, a widening disparity gap is likely.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Knisely
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Chi-Fang Wu
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexa Kanbergs
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Nuria Agusti
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Kirsten A Jorgensen
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Alexander Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Sharon H Giordano
- Department of Health Services Research, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Jose Alejandro Rauh-Hain
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Roni Nitecki Wilke
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Puri S, Saltos AN, Gray JE. Race-inclusive and equitable access to immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy: What are the biggest hurdles? Cancer 2023; 129:3692-3693. [PMID: 37728029 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.35013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
A real‐world data analysis evaluating the clinical outcomes of consolidation durvalumab after concurrent chemoradiation in Black versus non‐Black patients with unresectable stage III non–small cell lung cancer demonstrates that there was no overall difference in survival or toxicity between the two groups. The study addresses the important issue of race‐ and ethnicity‐related disparities in clinical trial accruals that limit the generalizability of the results across the patient population. Larger multi‐institutional prospective studies evaluating racially underrepresented populations are warranted to evaluate the contribution of individual factors, optimize treatment strategies, and narrow the disparities in cancer care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonam Puri
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Huntsman Cancer Institute at the University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
| | - Andreas N Saltos
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| | - Jhanelle E Gray
- Department of Thoracic Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Pasli M, Kannaiyan R, Namireddy P, Walker P, Muzaffar M. Impact of Race on Outcomes of Advanced Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Immunotherapy. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4208-4221. [PMID: 37185434 PMCID: PMC10136836 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30040321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 04/07/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The impact of race in advanced stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is conflicting. Our study sought to examine racial disparities in time to treatment initiation (TTI), overall survival (OS), and progression-free survival (PFS) using a population that was almost equally black and white. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study of stage IV NSCLC patients > 18 years receiving immunotherapy at our center between 2014 and 2021. Kaplan-Meier curves and the multivariate Cox proportional hazards model determined the predictors of OS and PFS. Analyses were undertaken using IBM PSAW (SPSS v.28). RESULTS Out of 194 patients who met the inclusion criteria, 42.3% were black (n = 82). In the multivariate analysis, there was no difference in PFS (HR: 0.96; 95% CI: 0.66,1.40; p = 0.846) or OS (HR: 0.99; 95% CI: 0.66, 1.48; p = 0.966). No difference in treatment selection was observed between white and black patients (p = 0.363), nor was there a difference observed in median time to overall treatment initiation (p = 0.201). CONCLUSIONS No difference was observed in OS and PFS in black and white patients. Black patients' reception of timelier immunotherapy was an unanticipated finding. Future studies are necessary to better understand how race impacts patient outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Melisa Pasli
- Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| | - Radhamani Kannaiyan
- Division of Hospital Medicine, Eat Carolina University Health, 2100 Stantonsburg Road, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| | - Praveen Namireddy
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| | | | - Mahvish Muzaffar
- Division of Hematology/Oncology, East Carolina University, Greenville, NC 27834, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Al Omari O, Jani C, Ahmed A, Singh H, Radwan A, Bhatt P, Walker A, Agarwal L, Goodall R, Shalhoub J, Marshall DC, Thomson CC, Salciccioli JD, Tapan U. Lung Cancer Mortality in the United States between 1999 and 2019: An Observational Analysis of Disparities by Sex and Race. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2023; 20:612-616. [PMID: 36476451 PMCID: PMC10112410 DOI: 10.1513/annalsats.202206-510rl] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Omar Al Omari
- Mount Auburn Hospital/Beth Israel Lahey HealthCambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts
| | - Chinmay Jani
- Mount Auburn Hospital/Beth Israel Lahey HealthCambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts
| | - Alaaeldin Ahmed
- Mount Auburn Hospital/Beth Israel Lahey HealthCambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Amr Radwan
- Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical CenterBoston, Massachusetts
| | - Padmanabh Bhatt
- Imperial College of LondonLondon, United Kingdom
- Imperial College Healthcare NHS TrustLondon, United Kingdom
| | - Alexander Walker
- Mount Auburn Hospital/Beth Israel Lahey HealthCambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts
| | - Lipisha Agarwal
- Mount Auburn Hospital/Beth Israel Lahey HealthCambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts
| | | | | | | | - Carey Conley Thomson
- Mount Auburn Hospital/Beth Israel Lahey HealthCambridge, Massachusetts
- Harvard Medical SchoolBoston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Umit Tapan
- Boston University School of Medicine and Boston Medical CenterBoston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yao S, Ambrosone CB, Osarogiagbon RU, Morrow GR, Kamen C. A biopsychosocial model to understand racial disparities in the era of cancer immunotherapy. Trends Cancer 2023; 9:6-8. [PMID: 36280546 PMCID: PMC9797434 DOI: 10.1016/j.trecan.2022.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2022] [Revised: 09/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
The approval and wide uptake of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in oncology practice raise the concerns of possibly worsened racial disparities in cancer treatment due to biological and psychosocial reasons. We propose a multilevel biopsychosocial model to understand the opportunities and challenges to racial disparities in the era of cancer immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Song Yao
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | - Christine B. Ambrosone
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Control, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY
| | | | - Gary R. Morrow
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| | - Charles Kamen
- Department of Surgery, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Smith GL, Banegas MP, Acquati C, Chang S, Chino F, Conti RM, Greenup RA, Kroll JL, Liang MI, Pisu M, Primm KM, Roth ME, Shankaran V, Yabroff KR. Navigating financial toxicity in patients with cancer: A multidisciplinary management approach. CA Cancer J Clin 2022; 72:437-453. [PMID: 35584404 DOI: 10.3322/caac.21730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 45.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 04/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately one-half of individuals with cancer face personal economic burdens associated with the disease and its treatment, a problem known as financial toxicity (FT). FT more frequently affects socioeconomically vulnerable individuals and leads to subsequent adverse economic and health outcomes. Whereas multilevel systemic factors at the policy, payer, and provider levels drive FT, there are also accompanying intervenable patient-level factors that exacerbate FT in the setting of clinical care delivery. The primary strategy to intervene on FT at the patient level is financial navigation. Financial navigation uses comprehensive assessment of patients' risk factors for FT, guidance toward support resources, and referrals to assist patient financial needs during cancer care. Social workers or nurse navigators most frequently lead financial navigation. Oncologists and clinical provider teams are multidisciplinary partners who can support optimal FT management in the context of their clinical roles. Oncologists and clinical provider teams can proactively assess patient concerns about the financial hardship and employment effects of disease and treatment. They can respond by streamlining clinical treatment and care delivery planning and incorporating FT concerns into comprehensive goals of care discussions and coordinated symptom and psychosocial care. By understanding how age and life stage, socioeconomic, and cultural factors modify FT trajectory, oncologists and multidisciplinary health care teams can be engaged and informative in patient-centered, tailored FT management. The case presentations in this report provide a practical context to summarize authors' recommendations for patient-level FT management, supported by a review of key supporting evidence and a discussion of challenges to mitigating FT in oncology care. CA Cancer J Clin. 2022;72:437-453.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Grace L Smith
- Department of Gastrointestinal Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Services Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Matthew P Banegas
- Department of Radiation Medicine and Applied Sciences, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Chiara Acquati
- Graduate College of Social Work, University of Houston, Houston, Texas
- Department of Health Disparities Research, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Shine Chang
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Fumiko Chino
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Affordability Working Group, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Rena M Conti
- Department of Markets, Public Policy, and Law, Boston University School of Business, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Rachel A Greenup
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Juliet L Kroll
- Department of Behavioral Science, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Margaret I Liang
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Maria Pisu
- Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Alabama, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Kristin M Primm
- Department of Epidemiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Michael E Roth
- Department of Pediatrics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Veena Shankaran
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance/University of Washington Medicine and Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington
| | - K Robin Yabroff
- Surveillance and Health Equity Science, American Cancer Society, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|