Critical hemodynamic therapy oriented resuscitation helping reduce lung water production and improve survival

High Respiratory and Cardiac Drive Exacerbate Secondary Lung Injury in Patients With Critical Illness

The high respiratory and cardiac drive is essential to the host-organ unregulated response. When a primary disease and an unregulated secondary response are uncontrolled, the patient may present in a high respiratory and cardiac drive state. High respiratory drive can cause damage to the lungs, pulmonary circulation, and diaphragm, while high cardiac drive can lead to fluid leakage and infiltration as well as pulmonary interstitial edema. A "respiratory and cardiac dual high drive" state may be a sign of an unregulated response and can lead to secondary lung injury through the increase of transvascular pressure and pulmonary microcirculation injury. Ultrasound examination of the lung, heart, and diaphragm is important when evaluating the phenotype of high respiratory drive in critically ill patients. Ultrasound assessment can guide sedation, analgesia, and antistress treatment and reduce the risk of high respiratory and cardiac drive-induced lung injury in these patients.

Physiological Regulation of Pulmonary Microcirculation under Mechanical Ventilation at Different Cardiac Outputs and Positive End-Expiratory Pressures in a Porcine Model

This study was performed to visualize the hemodynamic effects of pulmonary microcirculation and ventilation/perfusion (V/Q) matching after mechanical ventilation under different cardiac outputs and positive end-expiratory pressures (PEEPs). Ten experimental pigs were randomly divided into high and low tidal volume groups, and ventilation/perfusion were measured by electrical impedance tomography (EIT) at different PEEPs. Then, all the pigs were redivided into high cardiac output (CO) and low CO groups and measured by EIT at different PEEP levels with a low tidal volume. Additionally, sidestream dark field (SDF) was used to measure pulmonary microcirculation. Hemodynamic parameters and respiratory mechanics parameters were recorded. As PEEP increased at high tidal volume, blood flow was impaired at a higher PEEP (20 cmH2O) compared with low tidal volume (shunt: 30.01 ± 0.69% vs. 17.95 ± 0.72%; V/Q ratio: 65.12 ± 1.97% vs. 76.57 ± 1.25%, p < 0.01). Low tidal volume combined with an appropriate PEEP is the best option from the match between ventilation and pulmonary blood flow. Increasing PEEP can solve the problem of excessive shunt at high CO, and the V/Q ratio tends to match. At low CO, the increased dead space can reach as high as 64.64 ± 7.13% when PEEP = 20 cmH2O. With increasing PEEP, the microcirculation index deteriorates, including total vessel density (TVD), proportion of perfused vessel (PPV), perfused vessel density (PVD), and microcirculatory flow index (MFI). The periodic collapse of pulmonary capillaries or interruption of blood flow obviously occurred with high PEEP. The hemodynamic parameters indicated that the transpulmonary capillary wall pressure (Pcap) of the low CO group was negative at PEEP = 5 cmH2O, which determines the opening and closing of the pulmonary microcirculation and controls lung perfusion and the production of extravascular lung water. Therefore, it is essential to couple macrocirculation and pulmonary microcirculation during mechanical ventilation by improving shunting and optimizing Pcap.

Safety and efficacy of pulse-induced contour cardiac output monitoring in elderly patients with coronary artery disease and severe heart failure at coronary care units

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for elderly patients with severe heart failure depends on the accurate assessment of their hemodynamic status. Due to its less invasive nature, the safety and efficacy of invasive pulse-induced contour cardiac output (PiCCO)-based hemodynamic monitoring remains uncertain.

METHODS

This was a prospective observational study. Between January 2016 and July 2020, 190 elderly patients with severe heart failure were consecutively enrolled. The PiCCO group (89 patients) and non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring group (101 patients) were observed. Hospital stays results were evaluated.

RESULTS

No significant difference in clinical data (P > 0.05) or the incidence of 1-month mortality (16.0 vs. 35.0%, P = 0.141) were observed between groups. The coronary care unit (CCU) stay was shorter in the PiCCO group than in the non-invasive group (40.0 vs. 43.0%, P = 0.049). Indicators such as low Extravascular Lung Water Index (EVLWI), high Body Mass Index (BMI), low Pulmonary Artery Pressure (PAP), and high Left Ventricular Ejection Time (LVET), were associated with favorable clinical results.

CONCLUSION

Early invasive PiCCO monitoring is safe in critically ill elderly patients with severe heart failure. The hospital stay was reduced using PiCCO monitoring. These encouraging PiCCO results favor its use in elderly patients with severe heart failure at CCUs.

ISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill

Hemodynamic assessment along with continuous monitoring and appropriate therapy forms an integral part of management of critically ill patients with acute circulatory failure. In India, the infrastructure in ICUs varies from very basic facilities in smaller towns and semi-urban areas, to world-class, cutting-edge technology in corporate hospitals, in metropolitan cities. Surveys and studies from India suggest a wide variation in clinical practices due to possible lack of awareness, expertise, high costs, and lack of availability of advanced hemodynamic monitoring devices. We, therefore, on behalf of the Indian Society of Critical Care Medicine (ISCCM), formulated these evidence-based guidelines for optimal use of various hemodynamic monitoring modalities keeping in mind the resource-limited settings and the specific needs of our patients. When enough evidence was not forthcoming, we have made recommendations after achieving consensus amongst members. Careful integration of clinical assessment and critical information obtained from laboratory data and monitoring devices should help in improving outcomes of our patients.

How to cite this article

Kulkarni AP, Govil D, Samavedam S, Srinivasan S, Ramasubban S, Venkataraman R, et al. ISCCM Guidelines for Hemodynamic Monitoring in the Critically Ill. Indian J Crit Care Med 2022;26(S2):S66-S76.

Hemodynamic Characteristics of Patients with Myocardial Injury and Cardiogenic Shock Caused by Severe COVID-19-Related Pneumonia

Objective

To observe hemodynamic characteristics in a series of patients with myocardial injury caused by severe COVID-19-related pneumonia.

Materials and Methods

We continuously collected clinical data from severe COVID-19-related pneumonia patients from the West Campus of Union Hospital in Wuhan and Dongguan People's Hospital in Dongguan to explore the prevalence of myocardial injury and hemodynamic characteristics after circulatory failure. Doppler ultrasound and PiCCO2 were used to evaluate the hemodynamics of each patient, and arterial blood gas analysis was performed at the same time. Pearson correlation analysis was used to clarify the relationship between the parameters.

Results

A total of 376 patients were observed during the study period. Eighty-seven patients had myocardial injury after admission, and the mean time of myocardial injury after admission was 6 (2, 30) days, from which 16 patients developed hemodynamic instability and 15 died of cardiogenic shock or combined with MODS. Cardiac echocardiography found that the LVEF of all patients was in the normal range and that diastolic function was slightly to moderately impaired. The PiCCO2 data showed that the GEF was significantly decreased in all patients. The dpmx was in normal range. EVLWI, SVRI and GEDI were significantly increased in most patients. Pearson correlation analysis showed that cTNI was significantly related to BNP at hemodynamic instability (r = 0.662, p = 0.005); GEF was related to EVLWI (r = -0.572, p = 0.021) and LAC (r = 0.692, p = 0.003); and EVLWI was affected by LVEF (r = -0.564, p = 0.023), LVDF (r = -0.734, p = 0.001) and PVPI (r = -0.524, p = 0.037).

Conclusion

Hemodynamic status after myocardial injury and cardiogenic shock caused by severe COVID-19-related pneumonia was characterized by cardiac preload and increased EVLWI, accompanied by a decline in GEF.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome: focusing on secondary injury

Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is one of the most common severe diseases seen in the clinical setting. With the continuous exploration of ARDS in recent decades, the understanding of ARDS has improved. ARDS is not a simple lung disease but a clinical syndrome with various etiologies and pathophysiological changes. However, in the intensive care unit, ARDS often occurs a few days after primary lung injury or after a few days of treatment for other severe extrapulmonary diseases. Under such conditions, ARDS often progresses rapidly to severe ARDS and is difficult to treat. The occurrence and development of ARDS in these circumstances are thus not related to primary lung injury; the real cause of ARDS may be the “second hit” caused by inappropriate treatment. In view of the limited effective treatments for ARDS, the strategic focus has shifted to identifying potential or high-risk ARDS patients during the early stages of the disease and implementing treatment strategies aimed at reducing ARDS and related organ failure. Future research should focus on the prevention of ARDS.