1
|
DePietro DM, Li X, Shamimi-Noori SM. Chemoembolization Beyond Hepatocellular Carcinoma: What Tumors Can We Treat and When? Semin Intervent Radiol 2024; 41:27-47. [PMID: 38495263 PMCID: PMC10940046 DOI: 10.1055/s-0043-1777716] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
Liver metastases are the most common malignancy found in the liver and are 20 to 40 times more common than primary hepatic tumors, including hepatocellular carcinoma. Patients with liver metastases often present with advanced disease and are not eligible for curative-intent surgery or ablative techniques. The unique hepatic arterial blood supply of liver metastases allows interventional radiologists to target these tumors with transarterial therapies. Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been studied in the treatment of liver metastases originating from a variety of primary malignancies and has demonstrated benefits in terms of hepatic progression-free survival, overall survival, and symptomatic relief, among other benefits. Depending on the primary tumor from which they originate, liver metastases may have different indications for TACE, may utilize different TACE regimens and techniques, and may result in different post-procedural outcomes. This review offers an overview of TACE techniques and specific considerations in the treatment of liver metastases, provides an in-depth review of TACE in the treatment of liver metastases originating from colorectal cancer, neuroendocrine tumor, and uveal melanoma, which represent some of the many tumors beyond hepatocellular carcinoma that can be treated by TACE, and summarizes data regarding when one should consider TACE in their treatment algorithms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel M. DePietro
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Radiology, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Susan M. Shamimi-Noori
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Perelman School of Medicine at the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen LN, Carvajal RD. Tebentafusp for the treatment of HLA-A*02:01-positive adult patients with unresectable or metastatic uveal melanoma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2022; 22:1017-1027. [PMID: 36102132 PMCID: PMC10184536 DOI: 10.1080/14737140.2022.2124971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Metastatic uveal melanoma is associated with poor prognosis and few treatment options. Tebentafusp recently became the first FDA-approved agent for metastatic uveal melanoma. AREAS COVERED In this review, we describe the mechanism of action of tebentafusp as well as preclinical data showing high tumor specificity of the drug. We also review promising early phase trials in which tebentafusp demonstrated activity in metastatic uveal melanoma patients with an acceptable toxicity profile that included cytokine-mediated, dermatologic-related, and liver-related adverse events. Finally, we summarize findings from a pivotal phase III randomized trial in which tebentafusp demonstrated significant improvement in overall survival in comparison with investigator choice therapy. EXPERT OPINION Tebentafusp has transformed the treatment paradigm for metastatic uveal melanoma and should be the preferred frontline agent for most HLA-A*0201 positive patients. However, patients with rapidly progressing disease or high tumor benefit may not derive the same benefit. Areas of future study should focus on its role in the adjuvant setting as well as strategies to improve efficacy of tebentafusp in the metastatic setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lanyi Nora Chen
- Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032
| | - Richard D Carvajal
- Columbia University Medical Center, 161 Fort Washington Avenue, New York, NY 10032
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rantala ES, Hernberg MM, Piperno-Neumann S, Grossniklaus HE, Kivelä TT. Metastatic uveal melanoma: The final frontier. Prog Retin Eye Res 2022; 90:101041. [PMID: 34999237 DOI: 10.1016/j.preteyeres.2022.101041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2021] [Revised: 12/31/2021] [Accepted: 01/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Treatment of primary intraocular uveal melanoma has developed considerably, its driver genes are largely unraveled, and the ways to assess its risk for metastases are very precise, being based on an international staging system and genetic data. Unfortunately, the risk of distant metastases, which emerge in approximately one half of all patients, is unaltered. Metastases are the leading single cause of death after uveal melanoma is diagnosed, yet no consensus exists regarding surveillance, staging, and treatment of disseminated disease, and survival has not improved until recently. The final frontier in conquering uveal melanoma lies in solving these issues to cure metastatic disease. Most studies on metastatic uveal melanoma are small, uncontrolled, retrospective, and do not report staging. Meta-analyses confirm a median overall survival of 10-13 months, and a cure rate that approaches nil, although survival exceeding 5 years is possible, estimated 2% either with first-line treatment or with best supportive care. Hepatic ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging as surveillance methods have a sensitivity of 95-100% and 83-100%, respectively, to detect metastases without radiation hazard according to prevailing evidence, but computed tomography is necessary for staging. No blood-based tests additional to liver function tests are generally accepted. Three validated staging systems predict, each in defined situations, overall survival after metastasis. Their essential components include measures of tumor burden, liver function, and performance status or metastasis free interval. Age and gender may additionally influence survival. Exceptional mutational events in metastases may make them susceptible to checkpoint inhibitors. In a large meta-analysis, surgical treatment was associated with 6 months longer median overall survival as compared to conventional chemotherapy and, recently, tebentafusp as first-line treatment at the first interim analysis of a randomized phase III trial likewise provided a 6 months longer median overall survival compared to investigator's choice, mostly pembrolizumab; these treatments currently apply to selected patients. Promoting dormancy of micrometastases, harmonizing surveillance protocols, promoting staging, identifying predictive factors, initiating controlled clinical trials, and standardizing reporting will be critical steppingstones in reaching the final frontier of curing metastatic uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elina S Rantala
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Micaela M Hernberg
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Oncology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Paciuksenkatu 3, PL 180, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| | | | - Hans E Grossniklaus
- Section of Ocular Oncology, Emory Eye Center, 1365 Clifton Road B, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| | - Tero T Kivelä
- Ocular Oncology Service, Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Haartmaninkatu 4 C, PL 220, FI-00029, HUS, Helsinki, Finland.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Höppener DJ, Grünhagen DJ, Eggermont AMM, van der Veldt AAM, Verhoef C. An Overview of Liver Directed Locoregional Therapies. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2021; 30:103-123. [PMID: 33220800 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2020.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
An overview of all liver-directed locoregional therapies, including surgical resection for melanoma liver metastases (MLMs), is provided. MLM patients are divided by their primary melanoma location; cutaneous, uvea (eye), and mucosal melanoma. If patients with isolated cutaneous MLMs are considered for surgical resection, treatment with systemic therapy should be part of the treatment course. For uveal MLMs, complete surgical or ablative treatment of all MLMs suggests superior results compared with other liver-directed or systemic therapies, based on current evidence, no recommendations for any liver-directed regional therapy in the treatment of mucosal MLMs can be made.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diederik J Höppener
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dirk J Grünhagen
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Alexander M M Eggermont
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Heidelberglaan 25, 3584 CS, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Astrid A M van der Veldt
- Department of Medical Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis Verhoef
- Department of Surgical Oncology and Gastrointestinal Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Carle X, Gastaud L, Salleron J, Tardy MP, Caujolle JP, Thyss A, Thariat J, Chevallier P. Optimizing the treatment of liver metastases from uveal melanomas with transarterial chemoembolization using melphalan and calibrated microspheres. Bull Cancer 2020; 107:1274-1283. [PMID: 33183739 DOI: 10.1016/j.bulcan.2020.09.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2020] [Revised: 09/14/2020] [Accepted: 09/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Patients with liver metastasis from uveal melanoma have a poor prognosis. Efficacy and safety of hepatic transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) using melphalan and microspheres was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS Monocentric retrospective study of all consecutive patients treated by TACE using melphalan and 250μm calibrated microspheres between 2004 and 2016. Radiological response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1, modified (m)-RECIST and EASL on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Liver metastasis response, hepatic, extrahepatic and global progression free survival (PFS) complications were evaluated with the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 4.0 (CTCAE 4.0) and survival factors were secondary endpoints. RESULTS Thirty-four patients underwent 138 TACE (4; 4.1 sessions; range 1-9). Median OS was 16.5 months (mean 21.6 months). Liver metastasis response combining partial and complete response was 42.4%, 97%, 97% with RECIST 1.1, mRECIST, EASL, respectively. There were 58 severe (CTCAE≥3) but manageable complications in 28 patients, except for 1 toxic death. CONCLUSION For patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma ineligible for local treatments, TACE using melphalan may be performed as first line therapy in metastatic miliary disease from uveal melanomas with careful supportive care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xavier Carle
- University Hospital Archet 2, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 151 Route de Saint-Antoine, 06200 Nice, France
| | - Lauris Gastaud
- Antoine-Lacassagne Centre, Cancer Research Center, Department of Oncology, 133, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - Julia Salleron
- Lorraine Institute of Oncology, Department of Biostatistics, 6 avenue de Bourgogne, 54519 Vandoeuvre-lès-Nancy, France
| | - Magali Pascale Tardy
- Antoine-Lacassagne Centre, Cancer Research Center, Department of Oncology, 133, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - Jean-Pierre Caujolle
- University Hospital Pasteur 2, Department of Ophtalmology, 30, voie Romaine, 06001 Nice, France
| | - Antoine Thyss
- Antoine-Lacassagne Centre, Cancer Research Center, Department of Oncology, 133, avenue de Valombrose, 06189 Nice, France
| | - Juliette Thariat
- Francois-Baclesse Centre, Cancer Research Center, Department of Oncology, 3, avenue du Général Harris, 14000 Caen, France
| | - Patrick Chevallier
- University Hospital Archet 2, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, 151 Route de Saint-Antoine, 06200 Nice, France.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Rodriguez-Vidal C, Fernandez-Diaz D, Fernandez-Marta B, Lago-Baameiro N, Pardo M, Silva P, Paniagua L, Blanco-Teijeiro MJ, Piñeiro A, Bande M. Treatment of Metastatic Uveal Melanoma: Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E2557. [PMID: 32911759 PMCID: PMC7565536 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12092557] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2020] [Revised: 09/02/2020] [Accepted: 09/04/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION More than 50% of patients with uveal melanoma end up developing metastases. Currently, there is no standard first-line treatment that facilitates proper management of the metastatic disease. METHODS A systematic review of the last 40 years in PubMed with an exhaustive and strict selection of studies was conducted, in which the unit of measurement was overall survival (OS) expressed in Kaplan-Meier curves or numerically. RESULTS After the selection process, 110 articles were included. Regional therapies, such as intra-arterial liver chemotherapy (OS: 2, 9-22 months), isolated liver perfusion (OS: 9, 6-27, 4 months), or selective internal radiation therapy (OS: 18 months in monotherapy and 26 months in combination with other therapies) showed some superiority when compared to systemic therapies, such as chemotherapy (OS: 4, 6-17 months), immunotherapy (OS: 5-19, 1 month), immunosuppression (OS: 11 months), or targeted therapy (OS: 6-12 months), without being significant. CONCLUSIONS The results of this review suggest that there are no important differences in OS when comparing the different current treatment modalities. Most of the differences found seem to be explained by the heterogenicity of the different studies and the presence of biases in their design, rather than actual extensions of patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Rodriguez-Vidal
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Cruces, Cruces Plaza S/N, 48903 Barakaldo-Vizcaya, Spain;
| | - Daniel Fernandez-Diaz
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Beatriz Fernandez-Marta
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
| | - Nerea Lago-Baameiro
- Grupo Obesidómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - María Pardo
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
- Grupo Obesidómica, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - Paula Silva
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
- Fundación Pública Galega de Medicina Xenómica, Clinical University Hospital, SERGAS, 15705 Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| | - Laura Paniagua
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Coruña, Praza Parrote s/n, 15006 A Coruña, Spain;
| | - María José Blanco-Teijeiro
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Antonio Piñeiro
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| | - Manuel Bande
- Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital of Santiago de Compostela, Ramon Baltar S/N, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (D.F.-D.); (B.F.-M.); (M.J.B.-T.); (A.P.)
- Tumores Intraoculares en el Adulto, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago (IDIS), 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain; (M.P.); (P.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Meijer TS, Burgmans MC, de Leede EM, de Geus-Oei LF, Boekestijn B, Handgraaf HJM, Hilling DE, Lutjeboer J, Vuijk J, Martini CH, van Erkel AR, van der Meer RW, Tijl FGJ, Speetjens FM, Kapiteijn E, Vahrmeijer AL. Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan in Patients with Unresectable Ocular Melanoma Metastases Confined to the Liver: A Prospective Phase II Study. Ann Surg Oncol 2020; 28:1130-1141. [PMID: 32761328 PMCID: PMC7801354 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-020-08741-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
Background Ocular melanoma is the most common primary intraocular malignancy and has a very poor prognosis once liver metastases occur. The
aim of this study was to prospectively assess the efficacy and safety of percutaneous hepatic perfusion with melphalan (M-PHP) using the new second-generation
(GEN 2) hemofiltration system in patients with ocular melanoma metastases confined to the liver. Methods Prospective, single-center, single-arm, phase II study including patients with unresectable ocular melanoma metastases confined to the liver. Treatment consisted of two M-PHP procedures at 6–8 weeks interval. Procedures were performed using the CHEMOSAT (GEN 2) system with 3 mg/kg
melphalan. Primary endpoints were overall response rate (ORR) and best overall response (BOR). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), hepatic PFS (hPFS), and safety. Results Sixty-four M-PHP procedures were performed in 35 patients between February 2014 and June 2017. The ORR was 72%. BOR was as follows: complete response in 3%, partial response in 69%, stable disease in 13%, and progressive disease in 16%. There was no treatment-related mortality. Fourteen serious adverse events occurred. At a median follow-up of 19.1 months (range 5.6–69.5), median OS was 19.1 months and was significantly longer in responders than in nonresponders (27.5 vs. 11.9 months, p < 0.001). The 1- and 2-year OS was 77% and 43%, respectively. PFS and hPFS were 7.6 and 11.2 months, respectively. Conclusions M-PHP using the GEN 2 filter can achieve a high ORR and prolonged survival in patients with liver-only ocular melanoma metastases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Susanna Meijer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
| | - Mark C Burgmans
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Eleonora M de Leede
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.,Biomedical Photonic Imaging Group, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands
| | - Bas Boekestijn
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Denise E Hilling
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jacob Lutjeboer
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Vuijk
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Christian H Martini
- Department of Anesthesiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Arian R van Erkel
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | - Fred G J Tijl
- Department of Extra Corporal Circulation, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Frank M Speetjens
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Ellen Kapiteijn
- Department of Medical Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
The overall survival (OS) of patients with metastatic uveal melanoma is short, the evidence for effectiveness of treatments is limited, and no consensus on the choice of treatment exists. We aimed to advance interpretation of OS as an outcome by pooling peer-reviewed data. The design is a systematic review and meta-analysis. We searched PubMed from 1 January 1980, to 29 March 2017, for articles reporting patient-level survival in Kaplan-Meier or numerical form. We digitized survival graphs, pooled individual survival times, calculated median OS by treatment modality, and compared each modality by the log-rank test and Cox regression using conventional chemotherapy (CHT) as a reference. Individual-level data were obtained from 78 articles with 2494 patients. The median OS across all treatment modalities was 1.07 years (range: 0.59-2.50 years). Pooled OS reported after isolated hepatic perfusion [median OS: 1.34 years; hazard ratio (HR): 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.87-0.97, P = 0.0040], immunoembolization (median OS: 1.63; HR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.95-1.00, P = 0.0080), and surgery (median OS: 1.43; HR: 0.94, 95% CI: 0.92-0.96, P < 0.0001) was longer, and after checkpoint inhibitor shorter (median OS: 0.59; HR: 1.13, 95% CI: 1.06-1.20, P < 0.0001) than after CHT (median OS: 0.91 years), but subject to identifiable confounding factors. OS following other modalities did not differ from CHT. Reported OS was unassociated with the decade of publication, but depended on the percentage of first-line treated patients. Our results suggest no clinically significant difference in OS by treatment modality or decade. Most of the difference in reported OS likely is attributable to surveillance, selection, and publication bias rather than treatment-related prolongation. Our pooled data provide benchmarks for future trials.
Collapse
|
9
|
Rowcroft A, Loveday BPT, Thomson BNJ, Banting S, Knowles B. Systematic review of liver directed therapy for uveal melanoma hepatic metastases. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:497-505. [PMID: 31791894 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/02/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 11/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Uveal melanoma (UM) is a rare malignancy with a propensity for metastasis to the liver. Systemic chemotherapy is typically ineffective in these patients with liver metastases and overall survival is poor. There are no evidence-based guidelines for management of UM liver metastases. The aim of this study was to review the evidence for management of UM liver metastases. METHODS A systematic review of English literature publications was conducted across Ovid Medline, Ovid MEDLINE and Cochrane CENTRAL databases until April 2019. The primary outcome was overall survival, with disease free survival as a secondary outcome. RESULTS 55 studies were included in the study, with 2446 patients treated overall. The majority of these studies were retrospective, with 17 of 55 including comparative data. Treatment modalities included surgery, isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP), hepatic artery infusion (HAI), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), selective internal radiotherapy (SIRT) and Immunoembolization (IE). Survival varied greatly between treatments and between studies using the same treatments. Both surgery and liver-directed treatments were shown to have benefit in selected patients. CONCLUSION Predominantly retrospective and uncontrolled studies suggest that surgery and locoregional techniques may prolong survival. Substantial variability in patient selection and study design makes comparison of data and formulation of recommendations challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alistair Rowcroft
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Benjamin P T Loveday
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Benjamin N J Thomson
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgery, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Simon Banting
- Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Brett Knowles
- Department of Surgery, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia; Department of Surgical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Putzer D, Schullian P, Bale R. Locoregional ablative treatment of melanoma metastases. Int J Hyperthermia 2019; 36:59-63. [DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2019.1647353] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Putzer
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Peter Schullian
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Reto Bale
- Department of Radiology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Bala MM, Riemsma RP, Wolff R, Pedziwiatr M, Mitus JW, Storman D, Swierz MJ, Kleijnen J. Cryotherapy for liver metastases. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2019; 7:CD009058. [PMID: 31291464 PMCID: PMC6620095 DOI: 10.1002/14651858.cd009058.pub3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The liver is affected by two of the most common groups of malignant tumours: primary liver tumours and liver metastases from colorectal carcinoma. Liver metastases are significantly more common than primary liver cancer and long-term survival rates reported for patients after radical surgical treatment is approximately 50%. However, R0 resection (resection for cure) is not feasible in the majority of patients. Cryotherapy is performed with the use of an image-guided cryoprobe which delivers liquid nitrogen or argon gas to the tumour tissue. The subsequent process of freezing is associated with formation of ice crystals, which directly damage exposed tissue, including cancer cells. OBJECTIVES To assess the beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, other ablation methods, or systemic treatments in people with liver metastases. SEARCH METHODS We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE Ovid, Embase Ovid, and six other databases up to June 2018. SELECTION CRITERIA Randomised clinical trials assessing beneficial and harmful effects of cryotherapy and its comparators for liver metastases, irrespective of the location of the primary tumour. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS We used standard methodological procedures expected by Cochrane. We extracted information on participant characteristics, interventions, study outcomes, and data on the outcomes important for our review, as well as information on the design and methodology of the trials. Two review authors independently assessed risk of bias in each study. One review author performed data extraction and a second review author checked entries. MAIN RESULTS We found no randomised clinical trials comparing cryotherapy versus no intervention or versus systemic treatments; however, we identified one randomised clinical trial comparing cryotherapy with conventional surgery. The trial was conducted in Ukraine. The trial included 123 participants with solitary, or multiple unilobar or bilobar liver metastases; 63 participants received cryotherapy and 60 received conventional surgery. There were 36 women and 87 men. The primary sites for the metastases were colon and rectum (66.6%), stomach (7.3%), breast (6.5%), skin (4.9%), ovaries (4.1%), uterus (3.3%), kidney (3.3%), intestines (1.6%), pancreas (1.6%), and unknown (0.8%). The trial was not reported sufficiently enough to assess the risk of bias of the randomisation process, allocation concealment, or presence of blinding. It was also not possible to assess incomplete outcome data and selective outcome reporting bias. The certainty of evidence was low because of risk of bias and imprecision.The participants were followed for up to 10 years (minimum five months). The trial reported that the mortality at 10 years was 81% (51/63) in the cryotherapy group and 92% (55/60) in the conventional surgery group. The calculated by us relative risk (RR) with 95% Confidence Interval (CI) was: RR 0.88, 95% CI 0.77 to 1.02. We judged the evidence as low-certainty evidence. Regarding adverse events and complications, separately and in total, our calculation showed no evidence of a difference in recurrence of the malignancy in the liver: 86% (54/63) of the participants in the cryotherapy group and 95% (57/60) of the participants in the conventional surgery group developed a new malignancy (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.01; low-certainty evidence). The frequency of reported complications was similar between the cryotherapy group and the conventional surgery group, except for postoperative pain. Both insignificant and pronounced pain were reported to be more common in the cryotherapy group while intense pain was reported to be more common in the conventional surgery group. However, the authors did not report whether there was any evidence of a difference. There were no intervention-related mortality or bile leakages.We identified no evidence for health-related quality of life, cancer mortality, or time to progression of liver metastases. The study reported tumour response in terms of the carcinoembryonic antigen level in 69% of participants, and reported results in the form of a graph for 30% of participants. The carcinoembryonic antigen level was lower in the cryotherapy group, and decreased to normal values faster in comparison with the control group (P < 0.05). FUNDING the trial did not provide information on funding. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS The evidence for the effectiveness of cryotherapy versus conventional surgery in people with liver metastases is of low certainty. We are uncertain about our estimate and cannot determine whether cryotherapy compared with conventional surgery is beneficial or harmful. We found no evidence for the benefits or harms of cryotherapy compared with no intervention, or versus systemic treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malgorzata M Bala
- Jagiellonian University Medical CollegeChair of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine; Department of Hygiene and Dietetics; Systematic Reviews UnitKopernika 7KrakowPoland31‐034
| | - Robert P Riemsma
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews LtdUnit 6, Escrick Business ParkRiccall Road, EscrickYorkUKYO19 6FD
| | - Robert Wolff
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews LtdUnit 6, Escrick Business ParkRiccall Road, EscrickYorkUKYO19 6FD
| | - Michal Pedziwiatr
- Jagiellonian University Medical College2nd Department of General SurgeryKopernika Street 21KrakówMalopolskaPoland31‐501
| | - Jerzy W Mitus
- Centre of Oncology, Maria Skłodowska – Curie Memorial Institute, Krakow Branch. Department of Anatomy, Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow, PolandDepartment of Surgical Oncologyul. Garncarska 11KrakowPoland31‐115
| | - Dawid Storman
- University HospitalDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Systematic Reviews Unit, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Department of Adult PsychiatryKrakowPoland
| | - Mateusz J Swierz
- Jagiellonian University Medical CollegeDepartment of Hygiene and Dietetics, Systematic Reviews UnitKrakowPoland
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews LtdUnit 6, Escrick Business ParkRiccall Road, EscrickYorkUKYO19 6FD
- School for Public Health and Primary Care (CAPHRI), Maastricht UniversityMaastrichtNetherlands6200 MD
| | | |
Collapse
|
12
|
Tulokas S, Mäenpää H, Peltola E, Kivelä T, Vihinen P, Virta A, Mäkelä S, Kallio R, Hernberg M. Selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) as treatment for hepatic metastases of uveal melanoma: a Finnish nation-wide retrospective experience. Acta Oncol 2018; 57:1373-1380. [PMID: 29683787 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2018.1465587] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Finland, selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) is at present the preferred first-line loco-regional therapy for uveal melanoma patients with hepatic metastases not suitable for surgery. We retrospectively evaluate the outcome and safety of SIRT in this group of patients. MATERIAL AND METHODS Yttrium-90 microspheres were delivered via the hepatic artery into the circulation of metastases from uveal melanoma in 18 patients with a predicted life expectancy of more than three months in three Finnish tertiary referral centers between November 2010 and December 2015. Progression-free survival (PFS), toxicity and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Patients with historical uveal melanoma without extrahepatic metastases, who had received systemic chemotherapy as first-line treatment for their hepatic metastases at the Helsinki University Hospital between January 2006 and May 2010, were used as a historical control group. RESULTS Partial response and stable disease were observed in three (17%) and eight (44%) patients, respectively; one patient was not evaluable for response. Median PFS after SIRT was 5.6 (range, 1.3-40.8) months. Median OS after SIRT was 13.5 (range, 3.6-44.8) months compared with 10.5 (range, 3.0-16.5; p = .047) months for the historical chemotherapy group. Among patients who received SIRT as first-line treatment, the median OS was 18.7 (range, 8.2-44.8) months, significantly longer than that of the chemotherapy group (10.5 months, p = .017). There were no treatment-related deaths. Toxicity was mainly WHO grade 1-2 and self-limited. CONCLUSION SIRT is a feasible and safe treatment for liver metastases in patients with uveal melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sanni Tulokas
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Hanna Mäenpää
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Erno Peltola
- Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tero Kivelä
- Department of Ophthalmology, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Pia Vihinen
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Aku Virta
- Department of Oncology and Radiotherapy, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Siru Mäkelä
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Raija Kallio
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | - Micaela Hernberg
- Department of Oncology, Comprehensive Cancer Centre, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Cisplatin, dacarbazine and vinblastine as first line chemotherapy for liver metastatic uveal melanoma in the era of immunotherapy: a single institution phase II study. Melanoma Res 2018; 27:591-595. [PMID: 29076951 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000401] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
No standard therapy is established for metastatic uveal melanoma. Liver involvement in uveal melanoma may lead to organ impairment, which represents a common cause of death. Tumor shrinkage might improve survival by delaying hepatic failure. Since the combination of cisplatin, vinblastine, dacarbazine allowed a high response rate in metastatic cutaneous melanoma, we explored efficacy and safety of this regimen in unresectable liver metastases of uveal melanoma. In the present phase II study we administered intravenously cisplatin (80 mg/mq, day 1), dacarbazine (250 mg/mq/day, days 1-3), vinblastine (2 mg maximum, day 1) every 21 days as first line treatment for patients with unresectable metastases of uveal melanoma and BRAF wild type. Primary endpoint was objective response rate; overall survival (OS), progression-free survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Partial responses were observed in five (20%) patients, stable disease in 12 (48%) patients; disease control rate was 68%. Median OS of all the patients was 13 months, median progression free survival was 5.5 months. OS of responding patients was 21 months; OS of patients with disease control was 18 months, significantly longer than survival of progressing patients (7 months, P=0.0003). Five (20%) patients experienced grade 3-4 toxicity. Combination of cisplatin, vinblastine and dacarbazine was feasible and demonstrate both an interesting objective response rate and a survival benefit for patients achieving a disease control. This regimen could be considered for patients with good performance status and unresectable liver limited disease.
Collapse
|
14
|
Long-term survival in a patient with unresectable liver metastases from uveal melanoma treated with transarterial chemoembolization with irinotecan eluting beads - case report and review of literature. Contemp Oncol (Pozn) 2017; 21:244-248. [PMID: 29180934 PMCID: PMC5701586 DOI: 10.5114/wo.2017.70115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Accepted: 07/09/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Treatment of unresectable liver metastases (LM) from uveal melanoma (UM) remains a major clinical challenge. Systemic chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy regimens extrapolated from cutaneous melanoma are considered to be ineffective in therapy of metastases from uveal melanoma. Studies suggest that the progression of hepatic metastases rather than the primary tumor or metastases in other organs determines survival. Case report We report a case of transarterial chemoembolization of 57-year-old man diagnosed with unresectable liver metastases from uveal melanoma with irinotecan eluting beads. Therapy resulted in long progression free survival and overall survival, 41 months and 45 months after diagnosis of metastatic disease respectively. Patient did not experience any major side effects of the therapy. Follow-up CTs indicate stable disease in mRECIST criteria and partial response in CHOI criteria. Conclusions Transarterial chemoembolization with drug eluting beads loaded with irinotecan may be an effective treatment of unresectable liver metastases from uveal melanoma.
Collapse
|
15
|
Shamimi-Noori S, Gonsalves CF, Shaw CM. Metastatic Liver Disease: Indications for Locoregional Therapy and Supporting Data. Semin Intervent Radiol 2017; 34:145-166. [PMID: 28579683 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1602712] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Metastatic liver disease is a major cause of cancer-related morbidity and mortality. Surgical resection is considered the only curative treatment, yet only a minority is eligible. Patients who present with unresectable disease are treated with systemic agents and/or locoregional therapies. The latter include thermal ablation and catheter-based transarterial interventions. Thermal ablation is reserved for those with limited tumor burden. It is used to downstage the disease to enable curative surgical resection, as an adjunct to surgery, or in select patients it is potentially curative. Transarterial therapies are indicated in those with more diffuse disease. The goals of care are to palliate symptoms and prolong survival. The indications and supporting data for thermal ablation and transarterial interventions are reviewed, technical and tumor factors that need to be considered prior to intervention are outlined, and finally several cases are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susan Shamimi-Noori
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Carin F Gonsalves
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Colette M Shaw
- Division of Interventional Radiology, Department of Radiology, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Gordon AC, Uddin OM, Riaz A, Salem R, Lewandowski RJ. Making the Case: Intra-arterial Therapy for Less Common Metastases. Semin Intervent Radiol 2017; 34:132-139. [PMID: 28579681 DOI: 10.1055/s-0037-1601852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Intra-arterial therapies have high antitumor activity for both primary and secondary hepatic malignancies. Selective infusions allow increased delivery of cytoreductive therapy to the tumor bed while sparing the normal hepatic parenchyma. These therapies are now often applied in the outpatient setting or with short overnight hospital stays and have a growing role in the treatment of liver-dominant disease from metastatic colorectal cancer and from neuroendocrine tumors. Less commonly, intra-arterial therapies are applied to treat secondary hepatic malignancies from breast cancer, melanoma, pancreatic adenocarcinoma, and soft-tissue sarcomas. The available data are limited and generally retrospective observational cohort series of single institutions. The purpose of this article is to summarize the recent literature on outcomes for intra-arterial therapy in nonsurgical patients. Multi-institutional registries and prospective data are greatly needed, as intra-arterial therapies are increasingly applied in these patients to stop progression of chemorefractory tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew C Gordon
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Omar M Uddin
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Ahsun Riaz
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Riad Salem
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Robert J Lewandowski
- Department of Radiology, Section of Interventional Radiology, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.,Division of Transplant Surgery, Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jia Z, Jiang G, Zhu C, Wang K, Li S, Qin X. A systematic review of yttrium-90 radioembolization for unresectable liver metastases of melanoma. Eur J Radiol 2017. [PMID: 28624008 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the effectiveness of yttrium-90 (90Y) radioembolization in the treatment of unresectable liver metastases of melanoma. METHODS PubMed and EMBASE were systemically searched for all English language studies related to 90Y radioembolization for unresectable liver metastases of melanoma, including clinical trials, observational studies, and abstracts from conferences, published between January 1991 and March 2016. RESULTS A total of 12 reports (7 observational studies and 5 abstracts from conferences) involving 255 patients were included in the analysis. The primary sites of melanoma were cutaneous (n=22; 8.6%), ocular (n=197; 77.3%), rectal (n=3; 1.2%), and unknown (n=33; 12.9%). The median disease control rate at 3 months was 73.6% (range, 58.3%-88.9%). Among the 207 patients for whom tumor response at 3 months was reported, complete response was seen in 1.0% (2/207), partial response was seen in 19.3% (40/207), stable disease was seen in 46.9% (97/207), and progressive disease was seen in 32.9% (68/207). The median survival was 10 months (range, 7-13.4 months), and the median 1-year survival rate was 34.6% (range, 23%-80%). Complications of 90Y radioembolization were reported in 13 cases. The most common side effects were fatigue (median, 36.1%), abdominal pain (median, 17.8%), and nausea (median, 15.0%). CONCLUSIONS 90Y radioembolization is a promising alternative therapy for the treatment of unresectable liver metastases of melanoma, with encouraging effects on disease control and survival. Some complications can occur, and side effects are frequent but mild.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhongzhi Jia
- Department of Interventional Radiology, No. 2 People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Chang Zhou, 213003, China
| | - Guomin Jiang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, No. 2 People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Chang Zhou, 213003, China
| | - Chunfu Zhu
- Department of General Surgery, No. 2 People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Interventional Radiology, No. 2 People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Chang Zhou, 213003, China
| | - Shaoqin Li
- Department of Interventional Radiology, No. 2 People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Chang Zhou, 213003, China
| | - Xihu Qin
- Department of General Surgery, No. 2 People's Hospital of Changzhou, Nanjing Medical University, Changzhou, 213003, China.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Prospective Clinical and Pharmacological Evaluation of the Delcath System's Second-Generation (GEN2) Hemofiltration System in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion with Melphalan. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2017; 40:1196-1205. [PMID: 28451811 PMCID: PMC5554291 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-017-1630-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2016] [Accepted: 03/15/2017] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Introduction Percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with melphalan is an effective treatment for patients with hepatic metastases, but associated with high rates of bone marrow depression. To reduce systemic toxicity, improvements have been made to the filtration system. In pre-clinical studies, the Delcath System’s GEN2 filter was superior to the first-generation filters. In this clinical study, we analysed the pharmacokinetics and toxicity of PHP using the new GEN2 filter. Methods and Materials Starting February 2014, two prospective phase II studies were initiated in patients with hepatic metastases from ocular melanoma or colorectal cancer. In 10 PHP procedures performed in the first 7 enrolled patients, blood samples were obtained to determine filter efficiency and systemic drug exposure. PHP was performed with melphalan 3 mg/kg with a maximum of 220 mg. Complications were assessed according to CTCAE v4.03. Response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1. Results Pharmacokinetic analysis of blood samples showed an overall filter efficiency of 86% (range 71.1–95.5%). The mean filter efficiency decreased from 95.4% 10 min after the start of melphalan infusion to 77.5% at the end of the procedure (p = 0.051). Bone marrow depression was seen after up to 80.0% of 10 procedures, but was self-limiting and mostly asymptomatic. No hypotension-related complications or procedure-related mortality occurred. Conclusion The GEN2 filter has a higher melphalan filter efficiency compared to the first-generation filters and a more consistent performance. PHP with the GEN2 filter appears to have an acceptable safety profile, but this needs further validation in larger studies.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ben-Shabat I, Belgrano V, Hansson C, Olofsson Bagge R. The effect of perfusate buffering on toxicity and response in isolated hepatic perfusion for uveal melanoma liver metastases. Int J Hyperthermia 2017; 33:483-488. [PMID: 28110582 DOI: 10.1080/02656736.2017.1286046] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Isolated hepatic perfusion (IHP) is a treatment option for patients with liver metastases. Previous studies have found that liver toxicity is one of the limiting factors, and in an attempt to reduce the toxicity a buffering agent was added to the perfusate. The aim was to retrospectively analyse if this buffering reduced toxicity and complication rates. METHODS A retrospective review of 52 consecutive patients with uveal melanoma liver metastases treated with IHP between 2005 and 2013. Patients were followed by daily liver function tests (LFT). Toxicity was graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0 (CTCAE; United States Department of Health & Human Services, Washington, D.C), complications according to Clavien-Dindo and response according to RECIST-criteria. RESULTS Thirty-six patients were treated with a buffered perfusate and 16 patients without buffer. There was no difference in age, gender, largest tumour size or number of tumours between the groups. There was a significantly lower mean in peak ALT, AST, PK (INR) and bilirubin when comparing buffer with no-buffer. There were five major complications without a significant difference between the groups (8.3 vs. 12.5%, p = 0.33). There was a lower complete response (CR) rate (11 vs. 44%, p = 0.023) and a trend for shorter time to local progression (9.2 vs. 17.6 months, p = 0.096); however, not significant in multivariate analysis. There was no difference in survival (24.2 vs. 26.0 months, p = 0.43) between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Adding buffer to the perfusate during IHP significantly reduces postoperative LFTs; however, without a reduced complication rate. Interestingly, buffering also seems to reduce the response rate; however, this did not translate into a survival difference. To address if buffering adds any clinical benefit to the patients concerning toxicity, a larger prospective trial is necessary.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilan Ben-Shabat
- a Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Valerio Belgrano
- a Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Christoffer Hansson
- b Department of Thoracic Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- a Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences , Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital , Gothenburg , Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Efficacy and toxicity of transarterial chemoembolization therapy using cisplatin and gelatin sponge in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma in an Asian population. Int J Clin Oncol 2017; 22:577-584. [DOI: 10.1007/s10147-017-1095-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2016] [Accepted: 01/20/2017] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
21
|
Vogel A, Gupta S, Zeile M, von Haken R, Brüning R, Lotz G, Vahrmeijer A, Vogl T, Wacker F. Chemosaturation Percutaneous Hepatic Perfusion: A Systematic Review. Adv Ther 2017; 33:2122-2138. [PMID: 27798773 PMCID: PMC5126197 DOI: 10.1007/s12325-016-0424-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
The Hepatic CHEMOSAT® Delivery System is an innovative medical device for the treatment of patients with unresectable primary liver tumors or unresectable hepatic metastases from solid organ malignancies. This system is used to perform chemosaturation percutaneous hepatic perfusion (CS-PHP), a procedure in which a high dose of the chemotherapeutic agent melphalan is delivered directly to the liver while limiting systemic exposure. In a clinical trial program, CS-PHP with melphalan significantly improved hepatic progression-free survival in patients with unresectable hepatic metastases from ocular or cutaneous melanoma. Clinically meaningful hepatic responses were also observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or neuroendocrine tumors. Furthermore, the results of published studies and case reports demonstrated that CS-PHP with melphalan resulted in favorable tumor response rates in a range of tumor histologies (ocular or cutaneous melanoma, colorectal cancer, and hepatobiliary tumors). Analyses of the safety profile of CS-PHP revealed that the most common adverse effects were hematologic events (thrombocytopenia, anemia, and neutropenia), which were clinically manageable. Taken together, these findings indicate that CS-PHP is a promising locoregional therapy for patients with primary and secondary liver tumors and has a acceptable safety profile. FUNDING Delcath Systems Inc., New York, NY, USA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arndt Vogel
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany.
| | - Sanjay Gupta
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Hospital Southampton, Tremona Road, Southampton, Hampshire, UK
| | - Martin Zeile
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Rebecca von Haken
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Clinic Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Roland Brüning
- Department of Radiology and Neuroradiology, Asklepios Clinic Hamburg-Barmbek, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Gösta Lotz
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Alexander Vahrmeijer
- Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Thomas Vogl
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Clinic Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Frank Wacker
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Ben-Shabat I, Belgrano V, Ny L, Nilsson J, Lindnér P, Olofsson Bagge R. Long-Term Follow-Up Evaluation of 68 Patients with Uveal Melanoma Liver Metastases Treated with Isolated Hepatic Perfusion. Ann Surg Oncol 2015; 23:1327-34. [PMID: 26628434 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-015-4982-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2015] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This report describes the outcomes and long-term follow-up data from all isolated hepatic perfusions (IHPs) performed at a single institution in Sweden between the years 1989 and 2013 for patients with isolated uveal melanoma metastases. METHODS A total of 68 patients (median age, 61 years) were treated consecutively at Sahlgrenska University Hospital. Of the 68 patients, 67 % had fewer than 10 tumors. The median diameter of the largest lesion was 2.5 cm. The patients underwent IHP with either melphalan alone or the addition of either tumor necrosis factor-alpha or cisplatin. The response was assessed after 8-12 weeks by computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging. RESULTS The overall response rate was 67 and 20 % of the patients had a complete response. The median times to local and systemic progression were respectively 10 and 14 months. The prognostic factors for time to local recurrence were response and number of tumors. The median survival time was 22 months. The prognostic factors for survival were response, largest tumor diameter, and number of tumors. Five patients (7 %) died within 30 days, and six patients (9 %) experienced major complications (Clavien-Dindo 3/4). CONCLUSIONS Isolated hepatic perfusion is a treatment option with high response rates and tolerable mortality and morbidity. Whether IHP has a survival benefit compared with other treatment options currently is being investigated in a randomized trial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilan Ben-Shabat
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Valerio Belgrano
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Lars Ny
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jonas Nilsson
- Sahlgrenska Cancer Center, The Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Per Lindnér
- Transplant Institute, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Roger Olofsson Bagge
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at the University of Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Transarterial Chemoembolization of Liver Metastases from Uveal Melanoma Using Irinotecan-Loaded Beads: Treatment Response and Complications. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2015; 38:1532-41. [PMID: 25832764 DOI: 10.1007/s00270-015-1093-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2014] [Accepted: 03/15/2015] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE The purpose of this study was to evaluate treatment response and complications of transarterial chemoembolization using drug-eluting beads loaded with irinotecan (DEBIRI) in patients with liver metastases from uveal melanoma (UM). MATERIALS AND METHODS Patients treated with DEBIRI (n = 14) were retrospectively analyzed regarding overall survival, compared to patients (n = 14) treated with intravenous dacarbazine (DTIC). Median overall survival was calculated from time of diagnosis of metastatic disease (OS1) and start of treatment (OS2). Radiological response for DEBIRI was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 on contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CT), obtained 1.5 months (range 1.2-3.7) post treatment. Major complications of DEBIRI were defined according to the Society of Interventional Radiology classification for complications by outcome. RESULTS In the DEBIRI group, OS1 was 14.8 months (range 3.9-47.5), and OS2 was 9.4 months (range 1.7-39). Further, 11/13 (84.6%) of these patients had progressive disease on first follow-up CT and new lesions were seen in nine. There were 12 major complications in nine patients, possibly including one case of mortality due to disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC). CONCLUSION For patients with liver metastases from UM, the effect on overall survival of DEBIRI alone is questionable. Compared to previous reports, the response rate of DEBIRI was poor, with new liver lesions observed in the majority of patients. Major complications possibly included one case of DIC.
Collapse
|
24
|
Valpione S, Moser JC, Parrozzani R, Bazzi M, Mansfield AS, Mocellin S, Pigozzo J, Midena E, Markovic SN, Aliberti C, Campana LG, Chiarion-Sileni V. Development and external validation of a prognostic nomogram for metastatic uveal melanoma. PLoS One 2015; 10:e0120181. [PMID: 25780931 PMCID: PMC4363319 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0120181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2014] [Accepted: 02/03/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Approximately 50% of patients with uveal melanoma (UM) will develop metastatic disease, usually involving the liver. The outcome of metastatic UM (mUM) is generally poor and no standard therapy has been established. Additionally, clinicians lack a validated prognostic tool to evaluate these patients. The aim of this work was to develop a reliable prognostic nomogram for clinicians. Patients and Methods Two cohorts of mUM patients, from Veneto Oncology Institute (IOV) (N=152) and Mayo Clinic (MC) (N=102), were analyzed to develop and externally validate, a prognostic nomogram. Results The median survival of mUM was 17.2 months in the IOV cohort and 19.7 in the MC cohort. Percentage of liver involvement (HR 1.6), elevated levels of serum LDH (HR 1.6), and a WHO performance status=1 (HR 1.5) or 2–3 (HR 4.6) were associated with worse prognosis. Longer disease-free interval from diagnosis of UM to that of mUM conferred a survival advantage (HR 0.9). The nomogram had a concordance probability of 0.75 (SE .006) in the development dataset (IOV), and 0.80 (SE .009) in the external validation (MC). Nomogram predictions were well calibrated. Conclusions The nomogram, which includes percentage of liver involvement, LDH levels, WHO performance status and disease free-interval accurately predicts the prognosis of mUM and could be useful for decision-making and risk stratification for clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sara Valpione
- Melanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Region Oncology Research Institute (IOV-IRCCS), Padova, Italy; Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova, Italy
| | - Justin C Moser
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, US
| | | | - Marco Bazzi
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Aaron S Mansfield
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Simone Mocellin
- Department of Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Padova, Italy
| | - Jacopo Pigozzo
- Melanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Region Oncology Research Institute (IOV-IRCCS), Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Midena
- Department of Statistical Sciences, University of Padova, Padova, Italy; Department of Ophthalmology, University of Padova, Padova, Italy
| | - Svetomir N Markovic
- Division of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States of America
| | - Camillo Aliberti
- Interventional Radiology, Veneto Region Oncology Research Institute (IOV-IRCCS) Padova, Italy
| | - Luca G Campana
- Sarcoma and Melanoma Unit, Veneto Region Oncology Research Institute (IOV-IRCCS) Padova, Italy
| | - Vanna Chiarion-Sileni
- Melanoma Oncology Unit, Veneto Region Oncology Research Institute (IOV-IRCCS), Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|