1
|
Dieng M, Turner RM, Lord SJ, Einstein AJ, Menzies AM, Saw RPM, Nieweg OE, Thompson JF, Morton RL. Cost-Effectiveness of PET/CT Surveillance Schedules to Detect Distant Recurrence of Resected Stage III Melanoma. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:ijerph19042331. [PMID: 35206519 PMCID: PMC8872338 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph19042331] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2021] [Revised: 02/08/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
Objective: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of three surveillance imaging strategies using whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) in a follow-up program for adults with resected stage III melanoma. Methods: An analytic decision model was constructed to estimate the costs and benefits of PET/CT surveillance imaging performed 3-monthly, 6-monthly, or 12-monthly compared with no surveillance imaging. Results: At 5 years, 3-monthly PET/CT surveillance imaging incurred a total cost of AUD 88,387 per patient, versus AUD 77,998 for 6-monthly, AUD 52,560 for 12-monthly imaging, and AUD 51,149 for no surveillance imaging. When compared with no surveillance imaging, 12-monthly PET/CT imaging was associated with a 4% increase in correctly diagnosed and treated distant disease; a 0.5% increase with 6-monthly imaging and 1% increase with 3-monthly imaging. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of 12-monthly PET/CT surveillance imaging was AUD 34,362 for each additional distant recurrence correctly diagnosed and treated, compared with no surveillance imaging. For the outcome of cost per diagnostic error avoided, the no surveillance imaging strategy was the least costly and most effective. Conclusion: With the ICER for this strategy less than AUD 50,000 per unit of health benefit, the 12-monthly surveillance imaging strategy is considered good value for money.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mbathio Dieng
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia; (S.J.L.); (R.L.M.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Robin M. Turner
- Biostatistics Centre, Otago University, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand;
| | - Sarah J. Lord
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia; (S.J.L.); (R.L.M.)
| | - Andrew J. Einstein
- Seymour, Paul, and Gloria Milstein Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine and Radiology, Columbia University Irving Medical Center and New York-Presbyterian Hospital, New York, NY 10032, USA;
| | - Alexander M. Menzies
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney 2060, Australia; (A.M.M.); (R.P.M.S.); (O.E.N.); (J.F.T.)
- Department of Medical Oncology, Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, North Sydney 2060, Australia
| | - Robyn P. M. Saw
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney 2060, Australia; (A.M.M.); (R.P.M.S.); (O.E.N.); (J.F.T.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 2050, Australia
| | - Omgo E. Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney 2060, Australia; (A.M.M.); (R.P.M.S.); (O.E.N.); (J.F.T.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 2050, Australia
| | - John F. Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney 2060, Australia; (A.M.M.); (R.P.M.S.); (O.E.N.); (J.F.T.)
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia
- Department of Melanoma and Surgical Oncology, Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown 2050, Australia
| | - Rachael L. Morton
- NHMRC Clinical Trials Centre, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown 2050, Australia; (S.J.L.); (R.L.M.)
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney 2060, Australia; (A.M.M.); (R.P.M.S.); (O.E.N.); (J.F.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brain D, Jadambaa A. Economic Evaluation of Long-Term Survivorship Care for Cancer Patients in OECD Countries: A Systematic Review for Decision-Makers. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2021; 18:ijerph182111558. [PMID: 34770070 PMCID: PMC8582644 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph182111558] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 10/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
Long-term cancer survivorship care is a crucial component of an efficient healthcare system. For numerous reasons, there has been an increase in the number of cancer survivors; therefore, healthcare decision-makers are tasked with balancing a finite budget with a strong demand for services. Decision-makers require clear and pragmatic interpretation of results to inform resource allocation decisions. For these reasons, the impact and importance of economic evidence are increasing. The aim of the current study was to conduct a systematic review of economic evaluations of long-term cancer survivorship care in Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) member countries and to assess the usefulness of economic evidence for decision-makers. A systematic review of electronic databases, including MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO and others, was conducted. The reporting quality of the included studies was appraised using the Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) checklist. Each included study’s usefulness for decision-makers was assessed using an adapted version of a previously published approach. Overall, 3597 studies were screened, and of the 235 studies assessed for eligibility, 34 satisfied the pre-determined inclusion criteria. We found that the majority of the included studies had limited value for informing healthcare decision-making and conclude that this represents an ongoing issue in the field. We recommend that authors explicitly include a policy statement as part of their presentation of results.
Collapse
|
3
|
Postsurgical treatment landscape and economic burden of locoregional and distant recurrence in patients with operable nonmetastatic melanoma. Melanoma Res 2019; 28:618-628. [PMID: 30216199 PMCID: PMC6221390 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text. Surgery is the mainstay treatment for operable nonmetastatic melanoma, but recurrences are common and limit patients’ survival. This study aimed to describe real-world patterns of treatment and recurrence in patients with melanoma and to quantify healthcare resource utilization (HRU) and costs associated with episodes of locoregional/distant recurrences. Adults with nonmetastatic melanoma who underwent melanoma lymph node surgery were identified from the Truven Health MarketScan database (1 January 2008 to 31 July 2017). Locoregional and distant recurrence(s) were identified on the basis of postsurgery recurrence indicators (i.e. initiation of new melanoma pharmacotherapy, new radiotherapy, or new surgery; secondary malignancy diagnoses). Of 6400 eligible patients, 219 (3.4%) initiated adjuvant therapy within 3 months of surgery, mostly with interferon α-2b (n=206/219, 94.1%). A total of 1191/6400 (18.6%) patients developed recurrence(s) over a median follow-up of 23.1 months (102/6400, 1.6% distant recurrences). Among the 219 patients initiated on adjuvant therapy, 73 (33.3%) experienced recurrences (distant recurrences: 13/219, 5.9%). The mean total all-cause healthcare cost was $2645 per patient per month (PPPM) during locoregional recurrence episodes and $12 940 PPPM during distant recurrence episodes. In the year after recurrence, HRU was particularly higher in patients with distant recurrence versus recurrence-free matched controls: by 9.2 inpatient admissions, 54.4 inpatient days, 8.8 emergency department admissions, and 185.9 outpatient visits (per 100 person-months), whereas all-cause healthcare costs were higher by $14 953 PPPM. It remains to be determined whether the new generation of adjuvant therapies, such as immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted agents, will increase the use of adjuvant therapies, and reduce the risk of recurrences and associated HRU/cost.
Collapse
|
4
|
Deschner B, Wayne JD. Follow‐up of the melanoma patient. J Surg Oncol 2018; 119:262-268. [DOI: 10.1002/jso.25324] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/07/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Benjamin Deschner
- Department of Surgical OncologyUniversity of Tennessee Health Science CenterMemphis Tennessee
| | - Jeffrey D. Wayne
- Division of Surgical OncologyRobert H Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University Feinberg School of MedicineChicago Illinois
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Podlipnik S, Moreno-Ramírez D, Carrera C, Barreiro A, Manubens E, Ferrandiz-Pulido L, Sánchez M, Vidal-Sicart S, Malvehy J, Puig S. Cost-effectiveness analysis of imaging strategy for an intensive follow-up of patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stage IIB, IIC and III malignant melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2018; 180:1190-1197. [PMID: 29876940 DOI: 10.1111/bjd.16833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/31/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Many follow-up guidelines for patients with high-risk melanoma include expensive imaging studies, serum biomarkers and regular visits to the dermatologist, with little attention to cost-effectiveness. OBJECTIVES To establish the cost-effectiveness of chest-abdomen-pelvis computed tomography (CT) and brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in a follow-up protocol for patients at high risk of relapse. METHODS This was a prospective single-centre cohort study of 290 patients with clinicopathological American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage IIB, IIC and III melanoma. Patients had a body CT scan and brain MRI every 6 months and were withdrawn from the study after completing a 5-year follow-up or when metastases were detected. A cost-effectiveness analysis for each follow-up radiological procedure was performed. RESULTS Patients underwent 1805 body CT scans and 1683 brain MRIs. Seventy-six metastases (26·2%) were identified by CT or MRI. CT scan was cost-effective in the first 4 years (cost-effectiveness ratio €4710·70-€14 437·10/patient with metastasis); brain MRI was cost-effective during the first year (cost-effectiveness ratio €14 090·60/patient with metastasis). Limitations included lack of survival analysis and comparisons with willingness-to-pay thresholds. CONCLUSIONS Six-monthly CT scan of the chest, abdomen and pelvis is a cost-effective technique for the early detection of metastases in the first 4 years of follow-up in patients with AJCC stage IIC and III melanoma, and in the first 3 years in patients with AJCC stage IIB melanoma. In addition, brain MRI has been shown to be cost-effective only in the first year of follow-up in patients with AJCC stage IIC and III melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Podlipnik
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - D Moreno-Ramírez
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - C Carrera
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER on Rare Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Barreiro
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - E Manubens
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - L Ferrandiz-Pulido
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - M Sánchez
- Department of Radiology, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Vidal-Sicart
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - J Malvehy
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER on Rare Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| | - S Puig
- Department of Dermatology , Hospital Clinic of Barcelona, University of Barcelona, Spain.,Institut d'Investigacions Biomediques August Pi I Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain.,CIBER on Rare Diseases, Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Barbieri M, Richardson G, Paisley S. The cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies after cancer treatment: a systematic literature review. Br Med Bull 2018; 126:85-100. [PMID: 29659715 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldy011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2017] [Accepted: 03/18/2018] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The cost of treatment and follow-up of cancer patients in the UK is substantial. In a budget-constrained system such as the NHS, it is necessary to consider the cost-effectiveness of the range of management strategies at different points on cancer patients' care pathways to ensure that they provide adequate value for money. SOURCES OF DATA We conducted a systematic literature review to explore the cost-effectiveness of follow-up strategies of patients previously treated for cancer with the aim of informing UK policy. All papers that were considered to be economic evaluations in the subject areas described above were extracted. AREAS OF AGREEMENT The existing literature suggests that intensive follow-up of patients with colorectal disease is likely to be cost-effective, but the opposite holds for breast cancer. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY Interventions and strategies for follow-up in cancer patients were variable across type of cancer and setting. Drawing general conclusions about the cost-effectiveness of these interventions/strategies is difficult. GROWING POINTS The search identified 2036 references but applying inclusion/exclusion criteria a total of 44 articles were included in the analysis. Breast cancer was the most common (n = 11) cancer type followed by colorectal (n = 10) cancer. In general, there were relatively few studies of cost-effectiveness of follow-up that could influence UK guidance. Where there was evidence, in the most part, NICE guidance broadly reflected this evidence. AREAS TIMELY TO DEVELOP RESEARCH In terms of future research around the timing, frequency and composition of follow-ups, this is dependent on the type of cancer being considered. Nevertheless, across most cancers, the possibility of remote follow-up (or testing) by health professionals other than hospital consultants in other settings appears to warrant further work.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Barbieri
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - G Richardson
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, Heslington, York, UK
| | - S Paisley
- School of Health and Related Research (ScHARR), University of Sheffield, Regent Court, 30 Regent Street, Sheffield, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Prospective evaluation of prognostic indicators for early recurrence of cutaneous melanoma. Melanoma Res 2018; 27:43-49. [PMID: 27753732 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0000000000000302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
The majority of melanomas are thin lesions with an excellent prognosis; however, significant tumor heterogeneity exists, and a small percentage of patients with early-stage disease may progress to metastatic recurrence. This study aimed to assess whether prognostic factors previously shown to be significant in predicting stage I and stage II melanoma recurrence were consistent in a large prospectively collected patient cohort, and to identify novel prognostic factors associated with early recurrence to inform follow-up protocols. There were 1029 patients with stage I and stage II melanoma included in the analysis, of whom 123 developed a recurrence during follow-up (median 2.13 years). Multivariable analysis identified ulceration, presence of mitoses, Clark level, presence of lymphovascular invasion, and a history of autoimmune disease as factors independently associated with recurrence. These data identified patients with stage I-II melanoma with very low-risk for recurrence: no ulceration, zero mitoses, a low Clark level, no lymphovascular invasion, and possibly no history of autoimmune disease. These patients do not require intensive follow-up: 12 monthly reviews and full skin checks may be appropriate. Ongoing research into prognostic factors for recurrence in early-stage melanoma is important.
Collapse
|
8
|
Plouznikoff N, Arsenault F. Factors Linked to the Metastatic Spread of Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma to the Lower Extremities in a Retrospective 18F-FDG PET/CT Cohort. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.clsc.2017.10.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
9
|
Rosenbaum BE, Schafer CN, Han SW, Osman I, Zhong H, Brinster N. Computer-assisted measurement of primary tumor area is prognostic of recurrence-free survival in stage IB melanoma patients. Mod Pathol 2017; 30:1402-1410. [PMID: 28731044 PMCID: PMC5640153 DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2017.64] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2016] [Revised: 05/02/2017] [Accepted: 05/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Current staging guidelines are insufficient to predict which patients with thin primary melanoma are at high risk of recurrence. Computer-assisted image analysis may allow for more practical and objective histopathological analysis of primary tumors than traditional light microscopy. We studied a prospective cohort of stage IB melanoma patients treated at NYU Langone Medical Center from 2002 to 2014. Primary tumor width, manual area, digital area, and conformation were evaluated in a patient subset via computer-assisted image analysis. The associations between histologic variables and survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards model. Logistic regressions were used to build a classifier with clinicopathological characteristics to predict recurrence status. Of the 655 patients with stage IB melanoma studied, a subset of 149 patient tumors (63 recurred, 86 did not recur) underwent computer-assisted histopathological analysis. Increasing tumor width (hazard ratios (HR): 1.17, P=0.01) and digital area (HR: 1.08, P<0.01) were significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival, whereas non-contiguous conformation (HR: 0.57, P=0.05) was significantly associated with better recurrence-free survival. The novel histopathological classifier composed of digital area, conformation, and baseline variables effectively distinguished recurrent cases from non-recurrent cases (AUC: 0.733, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.647-0.818), compared to the baseline classifier alone (AUC: 0.635, 95% CI: 0.545-0.724). Primary tumor cross-sectional area, width, and conformation measured via computer-assisted analysis may help identify high-risk patients with stage IB melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brooke E. Rosenbaum
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Christine N. Schafer
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Sung Won Han
- The School of Industrial Management Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Iman Osman
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Hua Zhong
- Department of Population Health, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| | - Nooshin Brinster
- The Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, NY
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eigentler TK, Mühlenbein C, Follmann M, Schadendorf D, Garbe C. S3-Leitlinie Diagnostik, Therapie und Nachsorge des Melanoms - Update 2015/2016, Kurzversion 2.0. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2017; 15:e1-e41. [DOI: 10.1111/ddg.13247] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
|
11
|
Castro LGM, Bakos RM, Duprat Neto JP, Bittencourt FV, Di Giacomo THB, Serpa SS, Messina MCDL, Loureiro WR, Macarenco RSES, Stolf HO, Gontijo G. Brazilian guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of primary cutaneous melanoma - Part II. An Bras Dermatol 2016; 91:49-58. [PMID: 26982779 PMCID: PMC4782647 DOI: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20164715] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2015] [Accepted: 07/27/2015] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The last Brazilian guidelines on melanoma were published in 2002. Development in
diagnosis and treatment made updating necessary. The coordinators elaborated ten
clinical questions, based on PICO system. A Medline search, according to
specific MeSH terms for each of the 10 questions was performed and articles
selected were classified from A to D according to level of scientific evidence.
Based on the results, recommendations were defined and classified according to
scientific strength. The present Guidelines were divided in two parts for
editorial and publication reasons. In this second part, the following clinical
questions were answered: 1) which patients with primary cutaneous melanoma
benefit from sentinel lymph node biopsy? 2) Follow-up with body mapping is
indicated for which patients? 3) Is preventive excision of acral nevi
beneficious to patients? 4) Is preventive excision of giant congenital nevi
beneficious to patients? 5) How should stages 0 and I primary cutaneous melanoma
patients be followed?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Renato Marchiori Bakos
- Hospital de Clínicas de Porto Alegre, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Gabriel Gontijo
- Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ipenburg NA, Nieweg OE, Uren RF, Thompson JF. Outcome of Melanoma Patients Who Did Not Proceed to Sentinel Node Biopsy After Preoperative Lymphoscintigraphy. Ann Surg Oncol 2016; 24:117-126. [PMID: 27480356 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-016-5458-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2015] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND At our institution, a planned sentinel node biopsy (SNB) procedure is occasionally canceled after preoperative lymphoscintigraphy. This study reports the frequency of this, the reasons, and the management and outcomes of these patients. METHODS All patients with clinically localized cutaneous melanoma treated at Melanoma Institute Australia between 2000 and 2009 whose planned SNB procedure was not undertaken after lymphoscintigraphy were included in this retrospective study. RESULTS Of the 3148 patients in whom the procedure had been planned, 203 patients (6.4 %) did not have a SNB. The main reason for not proceeding with SNB (in 84 % of cases) was the lymphoscintigraphic demonstration of multiple drainage fields and/or multiple sentinel nodes (SNs). Patients who did not proceed to SNB were significantly older than those who did, more often had melanomas of the head or neck, and had more SNs and more nodal drainage fields. Of the 203 patients, 181 (89 %) were followed with high-resolution ultrasound of their SNs, which identified 33 % of the nodal recurrences before they were clinically apparent. Patients whose SNB was canceled had significantly worse recurrence-free survival and regional node disease-free survival, but melanoma-specific survival was similar. Compared to SN-positive patients, node-positive patients without SNB had significantly more involved nodes when a delayed lymphadenectomy was performed, but melanoma-specific survival was not significantly different after a median follow-up of 42 months. CONCLUSIONS Lymphoscintigraphy with ultrasound follow-up of previously identified SNs is an acceptable management strategy for patients in whom a SNB procedure is likely to be challenging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Omgo E Nieweg
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,Central Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. .,The Mater Hospital, North Sydney and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia.
| | - Roger F Uren
- Central Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Alfred Nuclear Medicine and Ultrasound, RPAH Medical Centre, Newtown, NSW, Australia
| | - John F Thompson
- Melanoma Institute Australia, North Sydney, NSW, Australia.,Central Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.,The Mater Hospital, North Sydney and Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Camperdown, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Doran CM, Ling R, Byrnes J, Crane M, Searles A, Perez D, Shakeshaft A. Estimating the economic costs of skin cancer in New South Wales, Australia. BMC Public Health 2015; 15:952. [PMID: 26400024 PMCID: PMC4581089 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-015-2267-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/23/2015] [Accepted: 09/14/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Skin cancer is one of the most common cancers in the world. The increased incidence of skin cancer, combined with limited health care resources and tight budgetary conditions, has increased the importance of understanding the economic impact of skin cancer. This research estimates the economic cost of skin cancer in the Australian state of New South Wales. Method An incidence based approach is used to estimate lifetime costs of skin cancer. Both direct and indirect costs are considered - direct costs include resources associated with the management of skin cancer and indirect costs refer to productivity costs associated with morbidity and premature mortality. Diagnosis of skin cancer was determined according to ICD-10 codes using principal diagnosis. Linked administrative data and regression modelling are used to calculate costs; presented as Australian dollars for the year 2010. The human capital approach is used to value present and future productivity losses. Results The lifetime cost of the 150,000 incident cases of skin cancer diagnosed in NSW in 2010 is estimated at $536 million ($44,796 per melanoma and $2459 per non-melanoma). Direct costs accounted for 72 % of costs ($10,230 per melanoma and $2336 per non-melanoma) and indirect costs accounted for 28 % of costs ($34,567 per melanoma and $123 per non-melanoma). Direct costs are, on average, higher for females than males with indirect costs, on average, higher for males than females. Conclusion This research provides new evidence on the economic cost of skin cancer and provides policy makers with information of the potential monetary savings that may arise from efforts to reduce the incidence of skin cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher M Doran
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 1000, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Rod Ling
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 1000, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Joshua Byrnes
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, Griffith University, Logan Campus L03 2.15, Meadowbrook, 4131, Australia.
| | - Melanie Crane
- Cancer Institute NSW, PO Box 41, Alexandria, NSW, 1435, Australia. .,School of Public Health, University of Sydney, Level 6, The Hub, Charles Perkins Centre (D17), Sydney, NSW, 2006, Australia.
| | - Andrew Searles
- Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Locked Bag 1000, New Lambton, NSW, 2305, Australia.
| | - Donna Perez
- Cancer Institute NSW, PO Box 41, Alexandria, NSW, 1435, Australia.
| | - Anthony Shakeshaft
- National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales Sydney, Sydney, NSW, 2052, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Livingstone E, Krajewski C, Eigentler TK, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Benson S, Elsenbruch S, Hauschild A, Rompel R, Meiss F, Mauerer A, Kähler KC, Dippel E, Möllenhoff K, Kilian K, Mohr P, Utikal J, Schadendorf D. Prospective evaluation of follow-up in melanoma patients in Germany - results of a multicentre and longitudinal study. Eur J Cancer 2015; 51:653-67. [PMID: 25638778 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.01.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2014] [Accepted: 01/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Patient numbers requiring long-term melanoma surveillance are constantly rising. Surveillance is costly and guideline recommendations vary substantially. METHODS In this German nationwide study, information on surveillance and treatment of patients diagnosed with melanoma and melanoma in situ (MMis) between April and June 2008 was prospectively collected over four years. Additionally, patient self-report questionnaires were evaluated to assess anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, socio-demographic information and use of disease specific health information sources at year 4 after primary diagnosis. RESULTS Complete data was available for 668 patients from 67 centres, of whom 96.0% were in regular melanoma surveillance. In year 3-4 of surveillance, only 55.6% of locoregionary metastases were detected during surveillance visits. Only 33.3% were self-detected by the patient even though 69.4% were documented as being clinically visible or palpable. Costs of 4year surveillance of 550 patients without tumour recurrence (stage I-IIC and MMis) accumulated to 228,155.75 €. Guideline-adherence for follow-up frequency, lymph node ultrasound, S100 serum level tests and diagnostic imaging recommendations was approximately 60% in year 3-4 of surveillance. Multivariate regression analysis showed that certain patient/tumour characteristics and regional differences were significantly associated with guideline deviations. The percentage of patients who exceeded published cut-off scores indicating clinically relevant symptoms of anxiety and depression were significantly increased. Patients frequently reported lack of psychosocial support and education but ascribed great importance to these. CONCLUSIONS We recommend further reduction of melanoma follow-up in low-risk melanoma patients and improvement of psycho-social support and patient education for all melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Livingstone
- Dept. of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany.
| | - C Krajewski
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - T K Eigentler
- Dept. of Dermatology, University Tübingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tübingen, Germany
| | | | - S Benson
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - S Elsenbruch
- Institute of Medical Psychology and Behavioral Immunobiology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
| | - A Hauschild
- Dept. of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Schittenhelmstr. 7, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - R Rompel
- Dept. of Dermatology Kassel, Clinical Centre Kassel, Mönchebergstr. 41, 34125 Kassel, Germany
| | - F Meiss
- Dept. of Dermatology, University Medical Centre Freiburg, Hauptstr. 7, 79104 Freiburg, Germany
| | - A Mauerer
- Dept. of Dermatology, University Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, 93053 Regensburg, Germany
| | - K C Kähler
- Dept. of Dermatology, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Schittenhelmstr. 7, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| | - E Dippel
- Dept. of Dermatology, Clinical Centre Ludwigshafen, Bremserstr. 79, 67073 Ludwigshafen, Germany
| | - K Möllenhoff
- Dept. of Dermatology, Ruhr-University Bochum, Gudrunstr. 56, 44791 Bochum, Germany
| | - K Kilian
- Dept. of Dermatology, Ludwig-Maximilians University Munich, Frauenlobstrasse 9-11, 80337 München, Germany
| | - P Mohr
- Dept. of Dermatology, Elbekliniken Stade-Buxtehude GmbH, Am Krankenhaus 1, 21614 Buxtehude, Germany
| | - J Utikal
- Skin Cancer Unit, German Cancer Research Centre (DKFZ), Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; Department of Dermatology, Venereology and Allergology, University Medical Centre Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karl University of Heidelberg, Theodor-Kutzer-Ufer 1-3, 68167 Mannheim, Germany
| | - D Schadendorf
- Dept. of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Hufelandstr. 55, 45122 Essen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
The experience of melanoma follow-up care: an online survey of patients in australia. J Skin Cancer 2014; 2014:429149. [PMID: 25535589 PMCID: PMC4254069 DOI: 10.1155/2014/429149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/12/2014] [Accepted: 11/07/2014] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Investigating patients' reports on the quality and consistency of melanoma follow-up care in Australia would assist in evaluating if this care is effective and meeting patients' needs. The objective of this study was to obtain and explore the patients' account of the technical and interpersonal aspects of melanoma follow-up care received. An online survey was conducted to acquire details of patients' experience. Participants were patients treated in Australia for primary melanoma. Qualitative and quantitative data about patient perceptions of the nature and quality of their follow-up care were collected, including provision of melanoma specific information, psychosocial support, and imaging tests received. Inconsistencies were reported in the provision and quality of care received. Patient satisfaction was generally low and provision of reassurance from health professionals was construed as an essential element of quality of care. "Gaps" in follow-up care for melanoma patients were identified, particularly provision of adequate psychosocial support and patient education. Focus on strategies for greater consistency in the provision of support, information, and investigations received, may generate a cost dividend which could be reinvested in preventive and supportive care and benefit patient well-being.
Collapse
|
16
|
Leiter U, Eigentler T, Garbe C. Follow-up in patients with low-risk cutaneous melanoma: is it worth it? Melanoma Manag 2014; 1:115-125. [PMID: 30190817 PMCID: PMC6094616 DOI: 10.2217/mmt.14.22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Follow-up examinations in melanoma aim to detect recurrences or secondary melanomas in an early phase of development. Follow-up guidelines that have been developed in many European countries, the USA and Australia show varying recommendations and are controversial, especially in patients with melanomas of 1.0 mm tumor thickness or less. This group contains 50-70% of all melanoma patients and the majority is unlikely to develop recurrences. On the other hand, within this entity, subgroups at higher risk for recurrences can be defined who require a more intense follow-up. This article discusses recommendations for the frequency, duration and costs of follow-up in low-risk melanoma patients. Patient preferences are addressed and a risk-adapted follow-up scheme is proposed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ulrike Leiter
- Center of Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Eigentler
- Center of Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| | - Claus Garbe
- Center of Dermato-Oncology, Department of Dermatology, University of Tuebingen, Liebermeisterstr. 25, 72076 Tuebingen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Fleming NH, Zhong J, da Silva IP, Vega-Saenz de Miera E, Brady B, Han SW, Hanniford D, Wang J, Shapiro RL, Hernando E, Osman I. Serum-based miRNAs in the prediction and detection of recurrence in melanoma patients. Cancer 2014; 121:51-9. [PMID: 25155861 DOI: 10.1002/cncr.28981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 79] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2014] [Revised: 06/27/2014] [Accepted: 07/02/2014] [Indexed: 01/17/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Identification of primary melanoma patients at the highest risk of recurrence remains a critical challenge, and monitoring for recurrent disease is limited to costly imaging studies. We recently reported our array-based discovery of prognostic serum miRNAs in melanoma. In the current study, we examined the clinical utility of these serum-based miRNAs for prognosis as well as detection of melanoma recurrence. METHODS Serum levels of 12 miRNAs were tested using qRT-PCR at diagnosis in 283 melanoma patients (training cohort, n = 201; independent validation, n = 82; median follow-up, 68.8 months). A refined miRNA signature was chosen and evaluated. We also tested the potential clinical utility of the miRNAs in early detection and monitoring of recurrence using multiple longitudinal samples (pre- and postrecurrence) in a subset of 82 patients (n = 225). In addition, we integrated our miRNA signature with publicly available Cancer Genome Atlas data to examine the relevance of these miRNAs to melanoma biology. RESULTS Four miRNAs (miR-150, miR-30d, miR-15b, and miR-425) in combination with stage separated patients by recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) and improved prediction of recurrence over stage alone in both the training and validation cohorts (training RFS and OS, P < .001; validation RFS, P < .001; OS, P = .005). Serum miR-15b levels significantly increased over time in recurrent patients (P < .001), adjusting for endogenous controls as well as age, sex, and initial stage. In nonrecurrent patients, miR-15b levels were not significantly changed with time (P =.17). CONCLUSIONS Data demonstrate that serum miRNAs can improve melanoma patient stratification over stage and support further testing of miR-15b to guide patient surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nathaniel H Fleming
- Ronald O. Perelman Department of Dermatology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York; Interdisciplinary Melanoma Cooperative Group, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
18
|
Botella Estrada R, Escutia Muñoz B. Staging and Follow-Up of Patients With Melanoma: Which Tests for Which Patients? ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2014. [DOI: 10.1016/j.adengl.2014.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
|
19
|
Auckland R, Wassell P, Hall S, Nicolson MC, Murchie P. Exploring patterns of recurrent melanoma in Northeast Scotland to inform the introduction a digital self-examination intervention. BMC DERMATOLOGY 2014; 14:4. [PMID: 24612627 PMCID: PMC3984711 DOI: 10.1186/1471-5945-14-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2013] [Accepted: 02/27/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Melanoma incidence is growing and more people require follow-up to detect recurrent melanoma quickly. Those detecting their own recurrent melanoma appear to have the best prognosis, so total skin self examination (TSSE) is advocated, but practice is suboptimal. A digital intervention to support TSSE has potential but it is not clear which patient groups could benefit most. The aim of this study was to explore cutaneous melanoma recurrence patterns between 1991 and 2012 in Northeast Scotland. The objectives were to: determine how recurrent melanomas were detected during the period; explore factors potentially predictive of mode of recurrence detection; identify groups least likely to detect their own recurrent melanoma and with most potential to benefit from digital TSSE support. METHODS Pathology records were used to identify those with a potential recurrent melanoma of any type (local, regional and distant). Following screening of potential cases available secondary care-held records were subsequently scrutinised. Data was collected on demographics and clinical characteristics of the initial and recurrent melanoma. Data were handled in Microsoft Excel and transported into SPSS 20.0 for statistical analysis. Factors predicting detection at interval or scheduled follow-up were explored using univariate techniques, with potentially influential factors combined in a multivariate binary logistic model to adjust for confounding. RESULTS 149 potential recurrences were identified from the pathology database held at Aberdeen Royal Infirmary. Reliable data could be obtained on 94 cases of recurrent melanoma of all types. 30 recurrences (31.9%) were found by doctors at follow-up, and 64 (68.1%) in the interval between visits, usually by the patient themselves. Melanoma recurrences of all types occurring within one-year were significantly more likely to be found at follow-up visits, and this remained so following adjustment for other factors that could be used to target digital TSSE support. CONCLUSIONS A digital intervention should be offered to all newly diagnosed patients. This group could benefit most from optimal TSSE practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Susan Hall
- Centre of Academic Primary Care - Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Polwarth Building, Foresterhill, Aberdeen AB25 2ZD, UK.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Pflugfelder A, Kochs C, Blum A, Capellaro M, Czeschik C, Dettenborn T, Dill D, Dippel E, Eigentler T, Feyer P, Follmann M, Frerich B, Ganten MK, Gärtner J, Gutzmer R, Hassel J, Hauschild A, Hohenberger P, Hübner J, Kaatz M, Kleeberg UR, Kölbl O, Kortmann RD, Krause-Bergmann A, Kurschat P, Leiter U, Link H, Loquai C, Löser C, Mackensen A, Meier F, Mohr P, Möhrle M, Nashan D, Reske S, Rose C, Sander C, Satzger I, Schiller M, Schlemmer HP, Strittmatter G, Sunderkötter C, Swoboda L, Trefzer U, Voltz R, Vordermark D, Weichenthal M, Werner A, Wesselmann S, Weyergraf AJ, Wick W, Garbe C, Schadendorf D. S3-guideline "diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of melanoma" -- short version. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2014; 11:563-602. [PMID: 23721604 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12044] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
|
21
|
Ulrich J, van Akkooi AJC, Eggermont AMM, Voit C. New developments in melanoma: utility of ultrasound imaging (initial staging, follow-up and pre-SLNB). Expert Rev Anticancer Ther 2014; 11:1693-701. [DOI: 10.1586/era.11.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
22
|
Speijers MJ, Francken AB, Hoekstra-Weebers JEHM, Bastiaannet E, Kruijff S, Hoekstra HJ. Optimal follow-up for melanoma. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2014. [DOI: 10.1586/edm.10.38] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
|
23
|
Botella Estrada R, Escutia Muñoz B. Staging and follow-up of patients with melanoma: which tests for which patients? ACTAS DERMO-SIFILIOGRAFICAS 2014; 105:531-4. [PMID: 24388613 DOI: 10.1016/j.ad.2013.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/23/2013] [Revised: 11/10/2013] [Accepted: 11/17/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- R Botella Estrada
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España.
| | - B Escutia Muñoz
- Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Follmann M, Schadendorf D, Kochs C, Buchberger B, Winter A, Wesselmann S. Quality assurance for care of melanoma patients based on guideline-derived quality indicators and certification. J Dtsch Dermatol Ges 2013; 12:139-47. [PMID: 24238575 DOI: 10.1111/ddg.12238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2013] [Accepted: 09/19/2013] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES In 2013 the first German S-3 guidelines on the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of melanoma were published in the framework of the German Guideline Program on Oncology. Quality indicators were developed at the same time as the guideline development process in order to implement the guideline recommendations. PATIENTS AND METHODS A multidisciplinary, interprofessional working group developed quality indicators following a standardized process. RESULTS Twelve quality indicators directly linked to guideline recommendations were generated and agreed on by consensus. They were integrated into the catalogue of requirements for dermato-oncological centers certified by the German Cancer Society. CONCLUSIONS The close cooperation between the guideline group and commission for certification allowed the guideline contents to be implemented in the form of quality indicators in everyday clinical practice. Adherence to the guidelines is required and continuously evaluated as part of certification.
Collapse
|
25
|
Scally CP, Wong SL. Intensity of follow-up after melanoma surgery. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 21:752-7. [PMID: 24114053 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-013-3295-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
This contemporary review of melanoma surveillance strategies seeks to help practitioners examine and improve their surveillance protocols based on the currently available data. In general, there is no definitive benefit from increased screening or more aggressive use of interval imaging. Low-intensity surveillance strategies do not appear to adversely affect patient outcomes and should be the preferred approach compared with high-intensity strategies for most melanoma patients. All surveillance programs should emphasize education in order to maximize the effectiveness of patient-based detection of recurrent disease.
Collapse
|
26
|
Variability in melanoma post-treatment surveillance practices by country and physician specialty: a systematic review. Melanoma Res 2013; 22:376-85. [PMID: 22914178 DOI: 10.1097/cmr.0b013e328357d796] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
There are no evidence-based guidelines for the surveillance of patients with melanoma following surgical treatment. We carried out a systematic review to identify by country and physician specialty the current stage-specific surveillance practices for patients with melanoma. Three major medical indices, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library database, and Scopus, were reviewed to identify articles published from January 1970 to October 2011 that included detailed information about the surveillance of patients with melanoma after the initial surgical treatment. Data on surveillance intervals and recommended evaluation were extracted and categorized by country and, when reported, physician specialty. One hundred and four articles from 10 countries and four physician specialties (dermatology, surgical oncology, medical oncology, and general practice) fulfilled the inclusion criteria, including 43 providing specific patient-level data. The articles showed a wide variation with respect to the surveillance intervals and recommended evaluations. The variation was greatest for patients with stage I disease, for whom the follow-up frequency ranged from one to six visits per year during years 1 and 2 after treatment. All four physician specialties agreed that for years 1-3, the follow-up frequency should be four times per year for all patients. For years 4 and 5, surgical oncologists recommended two follow-up visits per year, whereas general practitioners, dermatologists, and medical oncologists recommended four visits per year. Recommended imaging and laboratory evaluations were most intense in the UK and most minimalist in the Netherlands. Although general practitioners did not recommend routine laboratory or imaging tests for surveillance, all other specialties utilized both in their surveillance practice. Self skin-examination was recommended for surveillance in all countries and by all practitioner specialties. There are significant intercountry and interspecialty variations in the surveillance of patients with melanoma. As the number of melanoma survivors increases, it will be critical to examine the benefits and costs of various follow-up strategies to establish consensus guidelines for melanoma post-treatment surveillance.
Collapse
|
27
|
Testori A, Chiarion-Sileni V, Stanganelli I, Rossi CR, Di Filippo F, Ridolfi R, Parmiani G, Gandini S, Soteldo J. Follow-Up of Melanoma: A Survey of Italian Hospitals. Dermatology 2013; 226 Suppl 1:32-8. [DOI: 10.1159/000348874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
28
|
Guy GP, Ekwueme DU, Tangka FK, Richardson LC. Melanoma treatment costs: a systematic review of the literature, 1990-2011. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43:537-45. [PMID: 23079178 PMCID: PMC4495902 DOI: 10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 72] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2012] [Revised: 05/01/2012] [Accepted: 07/03/2012] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT Melanoma is the most deadly form of skin cancer and an important public health concern. Given the substantial health burden associated with melanoma, it is important to examine the economic costs associated with its treatment. The purpose of the current study was to systematically review the literature on the direct medical care costs of melanoma. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION A systematic review was performed using multiple databases including MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Econlit. Nineteen articles on the direct medical costs of melanoma were identified. EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS Detailed information on the study population, study country/setting, study perspective, costing approach, disease severity (stage), and key study results were abstracted. The overall costs of melanoma were examined as well as per-patient costs, costs by phase of care, stage of diagnosis, and setting/type of care. Among studies examining all stages of melanoma, annual treatment costs ranged from $44.9 million among Medicare patients with existing cases to $932.5 million among newly diagnosed cases across all age groups. CONCLUSIONS Melanoma leads to substantial direct medical care costs, with estimates varying widely because of the heterogeneity across studies in terms of the study setting, populations studied, costing approach, and study methods. Melanoma treatment costs varied by phase of care and stage at diagnoses; costs were highest among patients diagnosed with late-stage disease and in the initial and terminal phases of care. Aggregate treatment costs were generally highest in the outpatient/office-based setting; per-patient/per-case treatment costs were highest in the hospital inpatient setting. Given the substantial costs of treating melanoma, public health strategies should include efforts to enhance both primary prevention (reduction of ultraviolet light exposure) and secondary prevention (earlier detection) of melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gery P Guy
- Division of Cancer Prevention and Control, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, CDC, Atlanta, Georgia 30341, USA.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
29
|
Filleron T, Dalenc F, Kramar A. Personalised cancer follow-up: risk stratification, needs assessment or both? Br J Cancer 2012; 106:1579-80. [PMID: 22472885 PMCID: PMC3341867 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2012.108] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
|
30
|
Turner RM, Bell KJ, Morton RL, Hayen A, Francken AB, Howard K, Armstrong B, Thompson JF, Irwig L. Optimizing the Frequency of Follow-Up Visits for Patients Treated for Localized Primary Cutaneous Melanoma. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29:4641-6. [DOI: 10.1200/jco.2010.34.2956] [Citation(s) in RCA: 67] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To develop more evidence-based guidelines for the frequency of patient follow-up after treatment of localized (American Joint Committee on Cancer [AJCC] stage I or II) melanoma. Methods We used data from Melanoma Institute Australia on an inception cohort of 3,081 consecutive patients first diagnosed with stage I or II melanoma between January 1985 and December 2009. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox models were used to characterize the time course and predictors for recurrence and new primaries. We modeled the delay in diagnosis of recurrence or new primary as well as the number of monitoring visits required using two monitoring schedules: first, according to 2008 Australian and New Zealand guidelines and, second, with fewer visits, especially for those at lowest risk of recurrence. Results For every 1,000 patients beginning follow-up, 229 developed recurrence and 61 developed new primary within 10 years. There was only a small difference in modeled delay in diagnosis (extra 44.9 and 9.6 patients per 1,000 for recurrence and new primary, respectively, with delay greater than 2 months) using a schedule that requires far fewer visits (3,000 fewer visits per 1,000 patients) than recommended by current guidelines. AJCC substage was the most important predictor of recurrence, whereas age and date of primary diagnosis were important predictors of developing new primary. Conclusion By providing less intensive monitoring, more efficient follow-up strategies are possible. Fewer visits with a more focused approach may address the needs of patients and clinicians to detect recurrent or new melanoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robin M. Turner
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Katy J.L. Bell
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Rachael L. Morton
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Andrew Hayen
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Anne Brecht Francken
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Kirsten Howard
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Bruce Armstrong
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - John F. Thompson
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| | - Les Irwig
- Robin M. Turner, Katy J.L. Bell, Rachael L. Morton, Andrew Hayen, Kirsten Howard, Bruce Armstrong, John F. Thompson, and Les Irwig, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney; John F. Thompson, Melanoma Institute Australia, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia; and Anne Brecht Francken, Isala Klinieken, Zwolle, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Livingstone E, Windemuth-Kieselbach C, Eigentler TK, Rompel R, Trefzer U, Nashan D, Rotterdam S, Ugurel S, Schadendorf D. A first prospective population-based analysis investigating the actual practice of melanoma diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Eur J Cancer 2011; 47:1977-89. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2011.04.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2011] [Accepted: 04/19/2011] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
|
32
|
Peric B, Zagar I, Novakovic S, Zgajnar J, Hocevar M. Role of serum S100B and PET-CT in follow-up of patients with cutaneous melanoma. BMC Cancer 2011; 11:328. [PMID: 21810220 PMCID: PMC3162584 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2407-11-328] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2010] [Accepted: 08/02/2011] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Increased level of serum S100B can serve as a marker of metastatic spread in patients with cutaneous melanoma (CM). In patients with elevated S100 B and/or clinical signs of disease progression PET-CT scan is a valuable tool for discovering metastases and planning treatment. The aims of this study were to determine whether regular measurements of serum S100B are a useful tool for discovering patients with CM metastases and to evaluate the diagnostic value of PET-CT during the follow-up. Methods From September 2007 to February 2010, 115 CM patients included in regular follow up at the Institute of Oncology Ljubljana were appointed to PET-CT. There were 82 (71.3%) patients with clinical signs of disease progression and 33 (28.7%) asymptomatic patients with two subsequent elevated values of S100B. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV, NPV) of S100B and PET-CT were calculated using standard procedures. Results Disease progression was confirmed in 81.7% of patients (in 86.5% of patients with clinical signs of disease progression and in 69.7% of asymptomatic patients with elevated S100B). Sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of S100B was 33.8%, 90.9%, 96.0% and 17.5% in patients with clinical signs of disease progression. In 20.0% of patients increased serum S100B was the only sign of disease progression. Sensitivity and PPV of S100 in this group of patients were 100.0% and 69.7%. With PET-CT disease progression was diagnosed in 84.2% of symptomatic patients and in 72.7% of asymptomatic patients with elevated S100B. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of PET-CT for symptomatic patients was 98.5%, 90.9%, 98.5% and 90.9% and 100%, 90.0%, 95.8% and 100% for asymptomatic patients with elevated S100. Conclusions Measurements of serum S100B during regular follow-up of patients with CM are a useful tool for discovering disease progression in asymptomatic patients. The value of its use increases if measurements are followed by extended whole body PET-CT.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
Sentinel node status is the most powerful prognostic factor in patients with early-stage melanoma. This review discusses several issues of clinical interest and technical points for an optimized sentinel node biopsy (SNB) procedure. The role of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography is clearly established in patients with suspicion of locoregional or distant recurrence of melanoma before any surgical decision. However, its role at initial staging or follow-up of patients with localized disease or with positive SNB is less clear. Further research and efforts should focus on identifying which groups of patients are at specific high risk of early distant recurrence.
Collapse
|
34
|
Brown RE, Stromberg AJ, Hagendoorn LJ, Hulsewede DY, Ross MI, Noyes RD, Goydos JS, Urist MM, Edwards MJ, Scoggins CR, McMasters KM, Martin RC. Surveillance after surgical treatment of melanoma: Futility of routine chest radiography. Surgery 2010; 148:711-6; discussion 716-7. [DOI: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.07.042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2010] [Accepted: 07/15/2010] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
|
35
|
Gamble RG, Jensen D, Suarez AL, Hanson AH, McLaughlin L, Duke J, Dellavalle RP. Outpatient Follow-up and Secondary Prevention for Melanoma Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2010; 2:1178-97. [PMID: 24281112 PMCID: PMC3835125 DOI: 10.3390/cancers2021178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2010] [Revised: 06/02/2010] [Accepted: 06/03/2010] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Health care providers and their patients jointly participate in melanoma prevention, surveillance, diagnosis, and treatment. This paper reviews screening and follow-up strategies for patients who have been diagnosed with melanoma, based on current available evidence, and focuses on methods to assess disease recurrence and second primary occurrence. Secondary prevention, including the roles of behavioral modification and chemoprevention are also reviewed. The role of follow-up dermatologist consultation, with focused physical examinations complemented by dermatoscopy, reflectance confocal microscopy, and/or full-body mapping is discussed. Furthermore, we address the inclusion of routine imaging and laboratory assessment as components of follow-up and monitoring of advanced stage melanoma. The role of physicians in addressing the psychosocial stresses associated with a diagnosis of melanoma is reviewed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryan G. Gamble
- Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA; E-Mail: (R.G.G.); (J.D.J.)
| | - Daniel Jensen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA; E-Mail: (R.G.G.); (J.D.J.)
| | - Andrea L. Suarez
- Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA; E-Mail: (R.G.G.); (J.D.J.)
| | - Anne H. Hanson
- Kansas City University of Medicine and Biosciences, Kansas City, MO, USA; E-Mail:
| | - Lauren McLaughlin
- Rocky Vista University College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, USA; E-Mail:
| | - Jodi Duke
- Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA; E-Mail: (R.G.G.); (J.D.J.)
- School of Pharmacy, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA; E-Mail:
| | - Robert P. Dellavalle
- Department of Dermatology, University of Colorado Denver, Aurora, CO, USA; E-Mail: (R.G.G.); (J.D.J.)
- Dermatology Service, Denver Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Denver, CO, USA
- Epidemiology Department, Colorado School of Public Health, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Hansel G, Schönlebe J, Haroske G, Wollina U. Late recurrence (10 years or more) of malignant melanoma in south-east Germany (Saxony). A single-centre analysis of 1881 patients with a follow-up of 10 years or more. J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol 2010; 24:833-6. [PMID: 20070457 DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-3083.2009.03536.x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Late recurrent melanoma (MM) is rare. OBJECTIVE In the present study, we analysed the frequency of late recurrent MM in south-eastern Germany. PATIENTS AND METHODS In our centre, 2314 MM patients were documented (1972-2001). A total of 1881 patients in stage I or II (AJCC) with a follow-up of > or = 10 years were selected and screened for late recurrence (> or = 10 years after diagnosis). RESULTS Twenty patients were identified (1.1%), 13 women and 7 men, median age 44 years (age range 30-74 years). Nineteen suffered from cutaneous MM and one had a uveal MM (excluded from further analysis). The primary cutaneous MM occurred on the trunk (6), on the upper limb/shoulder (4), or on the lower limb (9). MM type was superficial spreading (13), nodular (2), acrolentiginous (1), lentigo maligna-type (1) or unclassified (2). Tumour thickness varied from 0.33 mm to 9.5 mm (median 2.0 mm). Ulceration was seen in four, and spontaneous regression in two MM patients. Invasiveness into blood or lymphatic vessels occurred in seven MM patients. The largest period from primary diagnosis to recurrence was 25.1 years with a median of 13.9 years. Metastatic spread was loco-regional (12 patients) or distant (7). Four patients were survivors and three of these had in-transit metastases only. Overall survival was 14.7 +/- 6.6 years. Statistical analysis could not identify factors significantly associated with late recurrence. CONCLUSIONS Late recurrence is a clinical sign of melanoma dormancy. We conclude that late recurrences argue for a lifelong follow-up of melanoma patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Hansel
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Academic Teaching Hospital Dresden-Friedrichstadt, Dresden, Germany
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|