1
|
Nobel T, Sihag S. Advances in Diagnostic, Staging, and Restaging Evaluation of Esophageal and Gastric Cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2024; 33:467-485. [PMID: 38789190 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2024.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/26/2024]
Abstract
The initial endoscopic and staging evaluation of esophagogastric cancers must be accurate and comprehensive in order to select the optimal therapeutic plan for the patient. Esophageal and gastric cancers (and treatment paradigms) are delineated by their proximity to the cardia (within 2 cm). The most frequent and important symptom that informs the initial staging evaluation is dysphagia, which is associated with at least cT3 or locally advanced disease. Endoscopic ultrasound is often needed if earlier stage disease is suspected, preferably in combination with endoscopic mucosal or submucosal resection or fine-needle aspiration of suspicious lymph nodes to enhance staging accuracy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamar Nobel
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-881, New York, NY 10065, USA
| | - Smita Sihag
- Thoracic Service, Department of Surgery, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, C-881, New York, NY 10065, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brenner B, Kundel Y, Cohen Z, Brand H, Gordon N, Sulkes A, Morgenstern S, Menasherov N, Kashtan H, Groshar D, Domachevsky L, Bernstine H. Early prediction of residual disease after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy and cetuximab for locally advanced esophageal cancer using 18F-FDG PET-CT imaging: a prospective cohort study. J Gastrointest Oncol 2022; 13:2721-2735. [PMID: 36636052 PMCID: PMC9830356 DOI: 10.21037/jgo-22-352] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2022] [Accepted: 09/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Previous studies in locally advanced esophageal cancer (LAEC) suggested that a change in the tumor's metabolic response, i.e., decrease of its interim 18F-FDG uptake compared with baseline, may predict histopathological response. We evaluated the possible predictive correlation between various PET-CT and histopathological parameters following a neoadjuvant biological-containing chemoradiotherapy (CRT) regimen. Methods Patients with resectable LAEC received neoadjuvant cisplatin/5-fluorouracil-based CRT and cetuximab following one cycle of induction chemotherapy and cetuximab. Changes in maximum and mean standardized uptake values (ΔSUV-max and ΔSUV-mean, respectively) and metabolic tumor volume (ΔMTV), measured by PET-CT at baseline and 2 weeks after the onset of treatment, were compared with histopathological findings at surgery. Histopathological response was defined by tumor regression grade (TRG), pathological complete response (pCR) and microscopic or macroscopic residual disease (RD). Results Of 18 patients, 13 (72%) with adenocarcinoma (AC) and 5 (28%) with squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), were included. None of the changes in the parameters of PET was associated with pCR; only ΔSUV-mean was associated with TRG in the AC cohort. In contrast, both ΔSUV-mean% and ΔSUV-max% were significantly associated with RD, both in the whole cohort and in the AC cohort. Changes in FDG-uptake predicted RD2 at surgery: only patients with less than 13% decrease in SUV-mean% or less than 29% decrease in SUV-max% had RD2, while all patients with RD0 or RD1 had greater reductions [100% specificity and 100% positive predictive value (PPV)]. Conclusions Changes in ΔSUV-max and ΔSUV-mean after two weeks of onset of cetuximab-based neoadjuvant chemotherapy for LAEC may predict macroscopic RD but not TRG or pCR at surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baruch Brenner
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel;,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Yulia Kundel
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Zoya Cohen
- Felsenstein Medical Research Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Hadar Brand
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Noa Gordon
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Aaron Sulkes
- Institute of Oncology, Davidoff Cancer Center, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel;,Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel
| | - Sara Morgenstern
- Institute of Pathology, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Nikolai Menasherov
- Department of Surgery A, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Hanoch Kashtan
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel;,Departments of Surgery A and B, Beilinson Hospital, Rabin Medical Center, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - David Groshar
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel;,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| | - Liran Domachevsky
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel;,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tiqva, Israel;,Department of Nuclear Medicine, The Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel
| | - Hanna Bernstine
- Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Ramat Aviv, Tel-Aviv, Israel;,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Rabin Medical Center, Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tiqva, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ting YC, Hsu PK, Chen HS, Lin CH, Chuang CY, Hsu HS, Hsu CP. Surgery or Surveillance for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma With Clinical Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2022; 35:603-614. [PMID: 35691769 DOI: 10.1053/j.semtcvs.2022.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/23/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
We aimed to evaluate the role of esophagectomy in patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma with clinically complete response (cCR) after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Data of patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who achieved cCR after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy between October 2008 and September 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. The criteria for cCR include: (1) tumor resolution on computed tomography, (2) maximum standardized uptake value decrement >35% on positron-emission tomography-computed tomography scan, and (3) a negative endoscopic biopsy result. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were compared between patients who received surveillance only (surveillance) and those who underwent surgery. A total of 154 patients with cCR, including 54 in the surveillance group and 100 in the surgery group, were included. The 5-year OS rates in the surveillance and surgery groups were 47.9% and 36.9 %, respectively (P= 0.210). The 5-year DFS rates were 38.1% and 28.2%, respectively (P = 0.203). Surgery was not a prognostic factor in the multivariable analysis (OS: HR: 1.26, 95% CI: 0.69-2.33, P = 0.453; DFS: HR: 1.08, 95% CI: 0.60-1.96, P = 0.795). In the surgery group, ypT0N0, ypT+Nany, and ypT0N+ were noted in 54%, 37%, and 9% of patients, respectively. The 5-year OS rates were 55.8%, 22.2%, and 12.4%, respectively (P = 0.001). No survival differences were noted between the surveillance and surgery groups. However, 46% of cCR patients in the surgery group did not have pathological complete response, and their outcomes were poor. Esophagectomy may be the only way to identify patients with residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ying-Che Ting
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Po-Kuei Hsu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Hui-Shan Chen
- Department of Health Care Administration, Chang Jung Christian University, Tainan, Taiwan
| | - Chih-Hung Lin
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Yen Chuang
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung, Taiwan
| | - Han-Shui Hsu
- School of Medicine, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan; Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Chung-Ping Hsu
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Hualien, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Gerke O, Ehlers K, Motschall E, Høilund-Carlsen PF, Vach W. PET/CT-Based Response Evaluation in Cancer-a Systematic Review of Design Issues. Mol Imaging Biol 2021; 22:33-46. [PMID: 31016638 DOI: 10.1007/s11307-019-01351-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Positron emission tomography/x-ray computed tomography (PET/CT) has long been discussed as a promising modality for response evaluation in cancer. When designing respective clinical trials, several design issues have to be addressed, especially the number/timing of PET/CT scans, the approach for quantifying metabolic activity, and the final translation of measurements into a rule. It is unclear how well these issues have been tackled in quest of an optimised use of PET/CT in response evaluation. Medline via Ovid and Science Citation Index via Web of Science were systematically searched for articles from 2015 on cancer patients scanned with PET/CT before and during/after treatment. Reports were categorised as being either developmental or evaluative, i.e. focusing on either the establishment or the evaluation of a rule discriminating responders from non-responders. Of 124 included papers, 112 (90 %) were accuracy and/or prognostic studies; the remainder were response-curve studies. No randomised controlled trials were found. Most studies were prospective (62 %) and from single centres (85 %); median number of patients was 38.5 (range 5-354). Most (69 %) of the studies employed only one post-baseline scan. Quantification was mainly based on SUVmax (91 %), while change over time was most frequently used to combine measurements into a rule (79 %). Half of the reports were categorised as developmental, the other half evaluative. Most development studies assessed only one element (35/62, 56 %), most frequently the choice of cut-off points (25/62, 40 %). In summary, the majority of studies did not address the essential open issues in establishing PET/CT for response evaluation. Reasonably sized multicentre studies are needed to systematically compare the many different options when using PET/CT for response evaluation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Oke Gerke
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark. .,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
| | - Karen Ehlers
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Edith Motschall
- Institute of Medical Biometry and Statistics, Faculty of Medicine and Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Poul Flemming Høilund-Carlsen
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.,Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Werner Vach
- Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Harada K, Wu CC, Wang X, Mizrak Kaya D, Amlashi FG, Iwatsuki M, Blum Murphy MA, Maru DM, Weston B, Lee JH, Rogers JE, Thomas I, Shanbhag N, Bhutani MS, Hofstetter WL, Nguyen QN, Ajani JA. Total Lesion Glycolysis Assessment Identifies a Patient Fraction With a High Cure Rate Among Esophageal Adenocarcinoma Patients Treated With Definitive Chemoradiation. Ann Surg 2020; 272:311-318. [PMID: 32675544 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000003228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to determine whether tumor metabolism could be prognostic of cure in L-EAC patients who receive definitive chemoradiation. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA Patients with inoperable localized esophageal adenocarcinoma (L-EAC) often receive definitive chemoradiation; however, biomarkers and/or imaging variables to prognosticate cure are missing. METHODS Two hundred sixty-six patients with L-EAC who had chemoradiation but not surgery were analyzed from the prospectively maintained EAC databases in the Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center (Texas, USA) between March 2002 and April 2015. Maximum standardized uptake value (SUVmax) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) from the positron emission tomography data were evaluated. RESULTS Of 266 patients, 253 (95%) were men; the median age was 67 years (range 20-91 yrs) and 153 had poorly differentiated L-EAC. The median SUVmax was 10.3 (range 0-87) and the median TLG was 85.7 (range 0-3227). Both SUVmax and TLG were higher among those with: tumors >5 cm in length, high clinical stage, and high tumor and node categories by TNM staging (all P < 0.0001). Of 234 patients evaluable for cure, 60 (25.6%) achieved cure. In the multivariable logistic regression model, low TLG (but not low SUVmax) was associated with cure (continuous TLG value: odds ratio 0.70, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54-0.92). TLG was quantified into 4 quartile categorical variables; first quartile (Q1; <32), second quartile (Q2; 32.0-85.6), third quartile (Q3; 85.6-228.4), and fourth quartile (Q4; >228.4); the cure rate was only 10.3% in Q4 and 5.1% in Q3 but increased to 28.8% in Q2, and 58.6% in Q1. The cross-validation resulted in an average accuracy of prediction score of 0.81 (95% CI, 0.75-0.86). CONCLUSIONS In this cross-validated model, 59% of patients in the 1st quartile were cured following definitive chemoradiation. Baseline TLG could be pursued as one of the tools for esophageal preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Harada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Carol C Wu
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dilsa Mizrak Kaya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Fatemeh G Amlashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Masaaki Iwatsuki
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Mariela A Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Dipen M Maru
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Brian Weston
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jane E Rogers
- Department of Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Irene Thomas
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Namita Shanbhag
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Quynh-Nhu Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Gabrielson S, Sanchez-Crespo A, Klevebro F, Axelsson R, Albert Tsai J, Johansson O, Nilsson M. 18F FDG-PET/CT evaluation of histological response after neoadjuvant treatment in patients with cancer of the esophagus or gastroesophageal junction. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:578-585. [PMID: 30111193 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118791204] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In most parts of the world, curatively intended treatment for esophageal cancer includes neoadjuvant therapy, either with chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone, followed by esophagectomy. Currently 18F-FDG positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is used for preoperative disease staging, but is not well established in the evaluation of neoadjuvant treatment. PURPOSE To evaluate changes in PET parameters in relation to the histological primary tumor response in the surgical specimen in patients randomized to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. MATERIAL AND METHODS Patients were randomized between either neoadjuvant chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy followed by esophagectomy.18F-FDG PET/CT exams were conducted at baseline and following neoadjuvant treatment. Standardized uptake ratio (SUR) values were measured in the primary tumor and compared as regards histological responders and non-responders as well as different treatment arms. RESULTS Seventy-nine patients were enrolled and 51 were available for analysis. A significant rate of SUR reduction was observed ( P = 0.02) in the primary tumor in histological responders compared to non-responders. Changes in SUR were significantly greater in responders following chemoradiotherapy ( P = 0.02), but not following chemotherapy alone ( P = 0.49). There was no statistically significant difference in SUR in patients with a complete histological response compared to those with a subtotal response. CONCLUSION Our results are similar to those of previous studies and show that changes in the rate of SUR can be used reliably to differentiate histological responders from non-responders after neoadjuvant treatment with either chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy. Limitations of current PET technology are likely to restrict the possibility of accurately ruling out limited residual disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Gabrielson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Alejandro Sanchez-Crespo
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Division of Medical Radiation Physics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Fredrik Klevebro
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Rimma Axelsson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Radiology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jon Albert Tsai
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ove Johansson
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Solna, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Centre for Digestive Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Division of Surgery, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Harada K, Mizrak Kaya D, Lopez A, Baba H, Ajani JA. Personalized therapy based on image for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE 2018; 6:80. [PMID: 29666803 PMCID: PMC5890029 DOI: 10.21037/atm.2017.10.28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2017] [Accepted: 11/02/2017] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Preoperative therapy is the gold standard for esophageal or gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. Positron emission tomography (PET) is not only essential for tumor staging, but changes in glucose consumption correspond with response to therapy and correlated with prognosis. Therefore, with further refinement, PET parameter can serve as a tool for personalized therapy. For instance, the Municon trials suggested the possibility of PET-response guided therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC) patients, however there are limitations. New PET parameters such as total lesion glycolysis (TLG) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) may provide better response prediction. Furthermore, PET parameters combined with genomic profiling might enhance better treatment selection, prediction, and prognostication. Here, we summarized the current state of understanding and future possibilities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Harada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Dilsa Mizrak Kaya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hideo Baba
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medical Science, Kumamoto University, Kumamoto, Japan
| | - Jaffer A. Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Harada K, Wang X, Shimodaira Y, Sagebiel T, Bhutani MS, Lee JH, Weston B, Elimova E, Lin Q, Amlashi FG, Mizrak Kaya D, Lopez A, Blum Murphy MA, Roth JA, Swisher SG, Skinner HD, Hofstetter WL, Rogers JE, Thomas I, Maru DM, Komaki R, Walsh G, Ajani JA. Early Metabolic Change after Induction Chemotherapy Predicts Histologic Response and Prognosis in Patients with Esophageal Cancer: Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Trial. Target Oncol 2018; 13:99-106. [PMID: 29218623 PMCID: PMC5826863 DOI: 10.1007/s11523-017-0540-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Early metabolic response after preoperative induction chemotherapy (IC) appears to predict histologic response and prognosis in esophageal cancer (EC), but the usefulness of this approach needs further development. OBJECTIVE We evaluated metabolic response after one cycle of IC using positron emission tomography (PET) to correlate PET response and outcomes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively analyzed PET data from a randomized phase 2 trial (NCT00525915) of chemoradiation and surgery with or without IC for the treatment of EC. PET was performed at baseline, after one cycle of IC, and 5-7 weeks after chemoradiation. The relationship between PET response (≥35% reduction in standardized uptake value [SUV]) after IC and treatment response was analyzed. RESULTS In 63 patients who received IC, the mean initial SUVmax prior to treatment was 11.9 ± 8.04 and mean SUVmax after one cycle of IC was 6.47 ± 4.45. The mean SUV reduction after IC was 39.3%. Eleven of 37 PET responders achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR), but only two of 22 PET non-responders did (univariate logistic regression; odds ratio: 4.25, 95% confidence interval: 0.83-21.77; p = 0.08). PET responders to IC had significantly longer overall survival (OS) than PET nonresponders (log-rank p = 0.009). PET response after chemoradiation was not correlated with OS (log-rank p = 0.15). CONCLUSION Early PET response after IC is prognostic, but subsequent PET changes (for example, after chemoradiation) are not prognostic. Early PET response might have the potential of predicting pCR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kazuto Harada
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Xuemei Wang
- Department of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Yusuke Shimodaira
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Tara Sagebiel
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Manoop S Bhutani
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jeffrey H Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Brian Weston
- Department of Gastroenterology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Elena Elimova
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Quan Lin
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Fatemeh G Amlashi
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dilsa Mizrak Kaya
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Anthony Lopez
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Mariela A Blum Murphy
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Jack A Roth
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Stephen G Swisher
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Heath D Skinner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wayne L Hofstetter
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jane E Rogers
- Pharmacy Clinical Programs, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Irene Thomas
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA
| | - Dipen M Maru
- Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ritsuko Komaki
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Garrett Walsh
- Department of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jaffer A Ajani
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Lu J, Sun XD, Yang X, Tang XY, Qin Q, Zhu HC, Cheng HY, Sun XC. Impact of PET/CT on radiation treatment in patients with esophageal cancer: A systematic review. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2016; 107:128-137. [PMID: 27823640 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2016.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2015] [Revised: 07/10/2016] [Accepted: 08/31/2016] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE With the advances in radiotracers, positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) is recognized as a useful adjunct to anatomic imaging with CT, MRI and endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS). The objective of this review was to comprehensively analyze the roles of PET/CT for the radiotherapy of esophageal cancer. METHODS In this review, we focused on issues concerning the application of PET/CT in TNM staging, target volume delineation and response to therapy, both for the primary tumor and regional lymph nodes. Furthermore, the following questions were addressed: how does PET/CT guide appropriate treatment protocols, how does it allow accurate tumor delineation and how does it guide prognosis and future treatment decisions. RESULTS AND CONCLUSION For the staging of esophageal cancer, PET/CT played a crucial role in exploring distant malignant lymph nodes and metastasis with high sensitivity, specificity and accuracy. PET/CT using different radiotracer provided a serial of thresholding methods based on standardized uptake value (SUV) to assist in auto-contouring the gross tumor volume (GTV). The change in SUV may offer a potential paradigm of personalized treatment to definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT). In total, PET/CT has sought to further optimize radiotherapy treatment planning for patients with esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Lu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Xiang-Dong Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The 81st Hospital of PLA, Nanjing 210002, PR China
| | - Xi Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Xin-Yu Tang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Qin Qin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Hong-Cheng Zhu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Hong-Yan Cheng
- Department of Synthetic Internal Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China
| | - Xin-Chen Sun
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210029, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Arnett ALH, Merrell KW, Macintosh EM, James SE, Nathan MA, Shen KR, Ravi K, Neben Wittich MA, Haddock MG, Hallemeier CL. Utility of 18F-FDG PET for Predicting Histopathologic Response in Esophageal Carcinoma following Chemoradiation. J Thorac Oncol 2016; 12:121-128. [PMID: 27569732 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtho.2016.08.136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2016] [Revised: 08/08/2016] [Accepted: 08/15/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION For patients with esophageal cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiation (CRT) followed by surgical resection, complete histopathologic response (pCR) is associated with favorable overall survival (OS). The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG PET) response to neoadjuvant CRT and pCR. METHODS Maximum standardized uptake values and standardized uptake ratios (SURs) were measured before and after CRT. SUR was normalized to liver uptake and mediastinal blood pool uptake. FDG PET complete response was defined as metabolic activity normalization to hepatic and blood pool activity. The correlation between FDG PET parameters and pCR was examined through logistic regression analyses. RESULTS In total, 193 patients were monitored for a median of 3.6 years after initiation of CRT. Most tumors were adenocarcinoma (85%) and stage T3 (75%). Complete FDG PET response and pCR occurred in 27% and 34% of patients, respectively. Histologic findings, chemotherapy type, tumor stage, and radiation dose were not significantly associated with complete radiographic response. The rates of pCR in patients with and without radiographic complete response were 42% and 31% (p = 0.17), respectively. No predictive correlation was found between pCR and change in maximum standardized uptake value (p = 0.25), in SUR normalized to blood pool uptake (p = 0.20), or in SUR normalized to liver uptake (p = 0.15). The 5-year OS rate was 46% for patients with a complete FDG PET response versus 44% without a complete response (p = 0.78). The 5-year OS rate of patients who achieved pCR was 49% versus 43% for patients with residual tumor (p = 0.04). CONCLUSION For patients with esophageal cancer who received neoadjuvant chemoradiation, pretreatment and posttreatment FDG PET parameters did not correlate with pCR or OS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Sarah E James
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Mark A Nathan
- Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - K Robert Shen
- Division of General Thoracic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Karthik Ravi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|