Clinical course of neuroendocrine tumors with different origins (the pancreas, gastrointestinal tract, and lung)

Calcifications and Cystic Morphology on Preoperative Imaging Predict Survival After Resection of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

BACKGROUND

Radiographic calcifications and cystic morphology are associated with higher and lower tumor grade, respectively, in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). Whether calcifications and/or cystic morphology could be used preoperatively to predict post-resection survival in patients with PNETs remains elusive.

METHODS

Patients undergoing curative-intent resection of well-differentiated PNETs from 2000 to 2017 at eight academic institutions participating in the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group were identified. Preoperative cross-sectional imaging reports were reviewed to identify the presence of calcifications and of a cystic component occupying >50% of the total tumor area. Clinicopathologic characteristics and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were compared.

RESULTS

Of 981 patients studied, 18% had calcifications and 17% had cystic tumors. Tumors with calcifications were more commonly associated with Ki-67 ≥3% (47% vs. 33%; p = 0.029), lymph node metastasis (36% vs. 24%; p = 0.011), and distant metastasis (13% vs. 4%; p < 0.001). In contrast, cystic tumors were less commonly associated with lymph node metastasis (12% vs. 30%; p < 0.001). Five-year RFS after resection was most favorable for cystic tumors without calcifications (91%), intermediate for solid tumors without calcifications (77%), and least favorable for any calcified PNET (solid 69%, cystic 67%; p = 0.043). Calcifications remained an independent predictor of RFS on multivariable analysis (p = 0.043) controlling for nodal (p < 0.001) and distant metastasis (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Easily detectable radiographic features, such as calcifications and cystic morphology, can be used preoperatively to stratify prognosis in patients with PNETs and possibly inform the decision to operate or not, as well as guide the extent of resection and potential use of neoadjuvant therapy.

Management and Survival Analysis of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors by Different Tumor Characteristics: Tertiary Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumor (GI-NET) is a group of neoplasia consisting of amine and acid producing cells with different hormonal profiles. Although the entire GIS accounts for about 2% of tumors, recent research reveals that the incidence rate has increased. Given the increasing incidence in GI-NETs, more and more extensive research is needed on this subject. In this regard, the demographic and clinicopathological features of the patients diagnosed with GI-NET and their relationship with survival were investigated in the present study.

METHODS

Thirty-four patients diagnosed with GI-NETs between January 2009 and December 2019 at the Department of Gastroenterology, Inonu University Faculty of Medicine were analyzed retrospectively. Gender, age, tumor localization, metastasis status, tumor number, tumor diameter, tumor grade, Ki-67 index, and the relationships of these factors with overall survival were examined.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 61.8% included in the study were male and 38.2% were female. The average age of the patients was 60.74 years. The most common tumor location was in the stomach (26.5%) and liver (26.5%). Apart from this, 17.6% of NETs were seen in the pancreas, 11.8% in the colon, 8.8% in the rectum, 5.9% in the small intestine, and 2.9% in the appendix. No significant relationship was observed between tumor location and gender (p = .326) and age (p = .641). The tumor diameter ranged from 0.2 cm to 13.91 cm, but the average tumor diameter was 3.84 cm. Solitary tumor was found in 51.5% of cases and multiple tumors in 48.5% of cases. The most common grade was Grade 1 with 41.2% of occurrence. The average of Ki-67 index was 18.36%. There was metastasis in 52.9% of cases. The rate of medical treatment was 48.5%. The median overall survival time of the patients was 23.1 months. In addition, 1-year overall survival was 74.9%, 2-year overall survival was 44.6%, and 5-year overall survival was 35.7%. A statistically significant difference was found between tumor grade and the presence of metastasis, and the overall survival (p = .003 and p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS

The tumor grade and the presence of metastasis in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors were found to be the most important prognostic factors affecting overall survival.

Rare Bone Metastasis of Neuroendocrine Tumors of Unknown Origin: A Case Report and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

The neuroendocrine tumor (NET) is rare, accounting for about 0.5% of all tumors. NETs have the characteristics of metastasis, especially lymph nodes, liver, spleen, and bone.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a 30-year-old man diagnosed with a NET with bone metastasis and presented with waist and leg pain. The imaging findings of this case showed multiple osteosclerosis and no apparent bone destruction. We collected the patient's previous examinations, including laboratory, imaging, and pathological examination to get a precise diagnosis. Given this case, we carried out symptomatic support treatment to relieve the patients' pain symptoms.

CONCLUSION

Bone metastases from NETs of unknown primary site are rare in both clinical and imaging manifestations. The disease is mainly manifested as multiple osteosclerosis, accompanied by muscle soreness and pain. It is recommended to try chemotherapy for this disorder.

An abdominal wall neuroendocrine tumor of unknown primary origin: A case report and review of the literature

Background

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are neoplasms that arise from cells of the endocrine and nervous system. NETs, often found in the gastrointestinal tract, can be found anywhere in the body, and have metastatic potential. NETs occasionally present with metastatic disease without an identifiable primary tumor.

Case

A 79‐year‐old female patient presented with an abdominal wall mass. Percutaneous biopsy was consistent with a NET. Preoperative endoscopy and PillCam were unremarkable. PET Dotatate demonstrated uptake in the abdominal wall as well as vague uptake in the pelvis. Intraoperatively, we identified a suspicious nodule on the sigmoid colon, which was consistent with a drop metastasis on final pathology.

Conclusion

In this case report we present a patient with a NET metastasis to the abdominal wall without a known primary site. This case highlights the limitations of endoscopy and imaging in the workup of metastatic NETs. Additionally, this is a novel case report of a metastatic NET to the abdominal wall without an identifiable primary site.

Sacral Insufficiency Fracture on 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT

ABSTRACT

68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT is an important tool for imaging neuroendocrine tumors, including skeletal metastases. However, false-positive results can occur in inflammatory pathologies such as sacral insufficiency fracture. We report the case of a 47-year-old man who was diagnosed with a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas. 68Ga-DOTATATE PET/CT showed 68Ga-DOTATATE uptake at the right side of the sacrum. Afterward, MRI made the diagnosis of sacral insufficiency fracture.

Systemic Treatment of Advanced Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in Korea: Literature Review and Expert Opinion

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) are a group of malignancies arising from neuroendocrine cells and frequently originate in the gastrointestinal tract and pancreas. Although curative resection is the main treatment for localized disease, systemic therapy is needed for relapsed or metastatic/unresectable gastroenteropancreatic NETs (GEP-NETs). Although there are several NET treatment guidelines from various countries, the geographical discrepancies between patient clinical characteristics, the regulatory approval status for therapeutic agents, and medical practices necessitate specific guidelines for Korean patients. We here provide a consensus review of the diagnosis, staging and systemic treatment of Korean GEP-NET patients. Systemic therapy options and the current Korean expert consensus on these treatments, including somatostatin analogs, targeted therapies such as everolimus and sunitinib, peptide receptor radionuclide treatments, and cytotoxic chemotherapies are addressed.

Specific Growth Rate as a Predictor of Survival in Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Multi-institutional Study from the United States Neuroendocrine Study Group

BACKGROUND

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs) are often indolent; however, identifying patients at risk for rapidly progressing variants is critical, particularly for those with small tumors who may be candidates for expectant management. Specific growth rate (SGR) has been predictive of survival in other malignancies but has not been examined in PNETs.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of adult patients who underwent PNET resection from 2000 to 2016 was performed utilizing the multi-institutional United States Neuroendocrine Study Group database. Patients with ≥ 2 preoperative cross-sectional imaging studies at least 30 days apart were included in our analysis (N = 288). Patients were grouped as "high SGR" or "low SGR." Demographic and clinical factors were compared between the groups. Kaplan-Meier and log-rank analysis were used for survival analysis. Cox proportional hazard analysis was used to assess the impact of various clinical factors on overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

High SGR was associated with higher T stage at resection, shorter doubling time, and elevated HbA1c (all P ≤ 0.01). Patients with high SGR had significantly decreased 5-year OS (63 vs 80%, P = 0.01) and disease-specific survival (72 vs 91%, P = 0.03) compared to those with low SGR. In patients with small (≤ 2 cm) tumors (N = 106), high SGR predicted lower 5-year OS (79 vs 96%, P = 0.01). On multivariate analysis, high SGR was independently associated with worse OS (hazard ratio 2.67, 95% confidence interval 1.05-6.84, P = 0.04).

CONCLUSION

High SGR is associated with worse survival in PNET patients. Evaluating PNET SGR may enhance clinical decision-making, particularly when weighing expectant management versus surgery in patients with small tumors.

Effect of metastatic site on survival in patients with neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs). An analysis of SEER data from 2010 to 2014

BACKGROUND

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) display variable behaviors based on origin and grade. We assumed that both tumor origin and the location of metastasis may play a role in survival.

METHODS

We queried the SEER database (2010-2014) for patients with an established diagnosis of NENs and documented site of metastasis and identified 2005 patients. Overall survival (OS) at the time points were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method Cox proportional-hazards models were used to evaluate the relationship of the interested variables and OS.

RESULTS

Lung, liver, bone and brain metastases were observed in 9, 77, 7 and 6% of metastatic patients respectively. In the multivariate model, metastasis locations were significantly associated with worse survival (liver HR: 1.677 (1.226-2.294); (bone metastasis HR: 1.412 (0.965-2.065); brain HR: 1.666 (1.177-2.357)). We produced a scoring system based on site of origin, metastasis location, age, gender, histology and tumor size that can stratify metastatic NEN patients in low, intermediate and high-risk categories to help physicians with decision making.

CONCLUSION

Site of metastasis plays an important role in survival of metastatic NEN patients independent of commonly described prognostic factors and should be considered in survival estimates.

Intratumoral Fibrosis and Tumor Growth Pattern as Prognostic Factors in Optimally Resected Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: An Analysis of 168 Cases

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (PanNENs) can recur after curative resection. We sought to establish the significance of tumor fibrosis and tumor growth pattern as predictors of recurrence-free survival and overall survival.

METHODS

A retrospective query of an institutional surgical database was performed from 2000 to 2018 to identify optimally resected PanNENs. All eligible slides were reviewed by an experienced gastrointestinal pathologist for established histopathologic prognostic factors, as well as fibrosis and tumor growth pattern. We evaluated the effect of the interested variables through Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

One hundred sixty-eight cases were considered. The majority of patients (90%) had grade 1 or 2 tumors, 46% showed significant fibrosis, and 22% demonstrated an infiltrative growth pattern. Twenty-one percent of patients had a recurrence. In multivariable analysis, lymphovascular invasion with a hazard ratio (HR) of 5.1 and infiltrative growth pattern (HR, 2.8) were significantly associated with increased risk of recurrence and increased risk of death (HR, 3.6 and 2.7, respectively). There was a significant decrease in recurrence-free survival and overall survival for fibrosis and infiltrative growth pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

In optimally resected PanNENs, the presence of fibrosis and infiltrative growth pattern are significant risk factors for recurrence and/or decreased survival.

Novel scoring system for recurrence risk classification of surgically resected G1/2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors - Retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Existing staging systems for pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms only provide accuracy in stratifying disease severity without enough sensitivity in prognosis predicting. Previously presented models mainly set overall survival as endpoint but ignore the importance of recurrence.

METHODS

Univariate and multivariate analyses were retrospectively conducted on the potential prognostic factors of 245 patients who underwent curable surgery of G1/2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors from December 2002 to May 2018 in our institute. Proposed model based on statistically significant factors were tested for recurrence risk classification estimation validity as measured by discrimination (receiver operator characteristic [ROC] curve and Harrell's c-index [HCI]) and calibration.

RESULTS

Multivariate analyses found lymph node metastasis, larger tumor size and grade 2 independent risk factors of disease-free survival (DFS). The novel scoring system for recurrence risk classification sorted patients into three groups: score<15.4 for low risk (79.0%, 3- and 5-year recurrence risk 0.8% and 4.3%, median DFS not reached), score>15.4, <24.5 for intermediate risk (20.8%, 3- and 5-year recurrence risk 11.6% and 21.4%, median DFS 70 months) and score >24.5 for high risk (10.2%, 3- and 5-year recurrence risk 37.3% and 68.7%, median DFS 49 months).The area under curve (AUC) and HCI of our system were 0.871 and 0.929, superior to those of European Neuroendocrine Tumor Society (AUC 0.833, HCI 0.806).

CONCLUSION

The presented system can be utilized to identify G1/2 pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors patients with high recurrence risk, which might be appropriate for peri-operative adjuvant therapy.

Margin status and long-term prognosis of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor after curative resection: Results from the US Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

The impact of margin status on resection of primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors has been poorly defined. The objectives of the present study were to determine the impact of margin status on long-term survival of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors after curative resection and evaluate the impact of reresection to obtain a microscopically negative margin.

METHODS

Patients who underwent curative-intent resection for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors between 2000 and 2016 were identified at 8 hepatobiliary centers. Overall and recurrence-free survival were analyzed relative to surgical margin status using univariable and multivariable analyses.

RESULTS

Among 1,020 patients, 866 (84.9%) had an R0 (>1 mm margin) resection, whereas 154 (15.1%) had an R1 (≤1 mm margin) resection. R1 resection was associated with a worse recurrence-free survival (10-year recurrence-free survival, R1 47.3% vs R0 62.8%, hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.2-2.7, P = .002); residual tumor at either the transection margin (R1t) or the mobilization margin (R1m) was associated with increased recurrence versus R0 (R1t versus R0: hazard ratio 1.8, 95% confidence interval 1.0-3.0, P = .033; R1m versus R0: hazard ratio 1.3, 95% confidence interval 1.0-1.7, P = .060). In contrast, margin status was not associated with overall survival (10-year overall survival, R1 71.1% vs R0 71.8%, P = .392). Intraoperatively, 539 (53.6%) patients had frozen section evaluation of the surgical margin; 49 (9.1%) patients had a positive margin on frozen section analysis; 38 of the 49 patients (77.6%) had reresection, and a final R0 (secondary R0) margin was achieved in 30 patients (78.9%). Extending resection to achieve an R0 status remained associated with worse overall survival (hazard ratio 3.1, 95% confidence interval 1.6-6.2, P = .001) and recurrence-free survival (hazard ratio 2.6, 95% confidence interval 1.4-5.0, P = .004) compared with primary R0 resection. On multivariable analyses, tumor-specific factors, such as cellular differentiation, perineural invasion, Ki-67 index, and major vascular invasion, rather than surgical margin, were associated with long-term outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Margin status was not associated with long-term survival. The reresection of an initially positive surgical margin to achieve a negative margin did not improve the outcome of patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors. Parenchymal-sparing pancreatic procedures for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors may be appropriate when feasible.

Nomogram predicting the risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection of primary non-metastatic gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors: An analysis of the U.S. Neuroendocrine Tumor Study Group

BACKGROUND

The risk of recurrence after resection of non-metastatic gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NET) is poorly defined. We developed/validated a nomogram to predict risk of recurrence after curative-intent resection.

METHODS

A training set to develop the nomogram and test set for validation were identified. The predictive ability of the nomogram was assessed using c-indices.

RESULTS

Among 1477 patients, 673 (46%) were included in the training set and 804 (54%) in y the test set. On multivariable analysis, Ki-67, tumor size, nodal status, and invasion of adjacent organs were independent predictors of DFS. The risk of death increased by 8% for each percentage increase in the Ki-67 index (HR 1.08, 95% CI, 1.05-1.10; P < 0.001). GEP-NET invading adjacent organs had a HR of 1.65 (95% CI, 1.03-2.65; P = 0.038), similar to tumors ≥3 cm (HR 1.67, 95% CI, 1.11-2.51; P = 0.014). Patients with 1-3 positive nodes and patients with >3 positive nodes had a HR of 1.81 (95% CI, 1.12-2.87; P = 0.014) and 2.51 (95% CI, 1.50-4.24; P < 0.001), respectively. The nomogram demonstrated good ability to predict risk of recurrence (c-index: training set, 0.739; test set, 0.718).

CONCLUSION

The nomogram was able to predict the risk of recurrence and can be easily applied in the clinical setting.

Clinical, pathological, and demographic factors associated with development of recurrences after surgical resection in elderly patients with neuroendocrine tumors

Background

Incidence of locoregional neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) is rising. However, after curative resection, the patterns and risk factors associated with recurrence remain unknown. Consensus guidelines recommend surveillance every 6-12 months for up to 10 years after surgery for resected, well-differentiated NETs irrespective of patient demographics, site, grade or stage of tumor with few exceptions.

Patients and methods

From the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Medicare database, we identified localized and regional stage NET patients who underwent surgical resection between January 2002 and December 2011. Development of recurrence was identified by capturing at least two claims indicative of metastatic disease until 31 December 2013.

Results

Of the 2366 identified patients (median age 73 years), 369 (16%) developed metastatic disease within 5 years and only an additional 1% developed metastases between years 5 and 10 with the majority dying due to unrelated causes. The 5-year risk of developing metastases (hazard ratio, HR) varied significantly (log-rank P < 0.001) by grade: 9.9% versus 25.9% (2.2) versus 48.1% (4.4) for grades 1, 2, and  ≥ 3, respectively; stage: 10.3% versus 31.1% (2.8) for localized versus regional; primary tumor size: 7.6% versus 15% (1.3) versus 26.6% (1.5) for <1, 1-2, and > 2 cm, respectively; and site: ranging from 11.3% for colon to 23.9% for pancreas.

Conclusions

Contrary to current guidelines, our study suggests that surveillance recommendations should be tailored according to patient and tumor characteristics. Surveillance past 5 years may be avoided in elderly patients with competing morbidities or low risk of recurrence. Pancreatic, lung, higher grade, and regional NETs have a higher risk of recurrence and may be considered for future adjuvant trials.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life with Sunitinib Versus Placebo for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: Results From an International Phase III Trial

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis was to compare patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in a pivotal phase III trial of sunitinib versus placebo in patients with progressive, well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NCT00428597).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients received sunitinib 37.5 mg (n = 86) or placebo (n = 85) on a continuous daily-dosing schedule until disease progression, unacceptable adverse events (AEs), or death. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 at baseline, Day 1 of every 4-week cycle, and end of treatment or withdrawal. Changes ≥10 points on each scale or item were deemed clinically meaningful.

RESULTS

Sunitinib had anti-tumor effects and improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with placebo. The study was terminated early for this reason and because of more serious AEs and deaths with placebo. Baseline HRQoL scores were well balanced between study arms, and were generally maintained over time in both groups. In the first 10 cycles, there were no significant differences between groups in global HRQoL, cognitive, emotional, physical, role, and social functioning domains, or symptom scales, except for worsening diarrhea with sunitinib (p < 0.0001 vs. placebo). Insomnia also worsened with sunitinib (p = 0.0372 vs. placebo), but the difference was not clinically meaningful.

CONCLUSION

With the exception of diarrhea (a recognized side effect), sunitinib had no impact on global HRQoL, functional domains, or symptom scales during the progression-free period. Hence, in patients with pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, sunitinib provided a benefit in PFS without adversely affecting HRQoL.

Prognostic factors of long-term outcome in surgically resectable pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors: A 12-year experience from a single center

The present study was performed to assess the prognostic factors with respect to patient survival and clinicopathological characteristics for patients who underwent surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PNETs). A retrospective review of patients pathologically diagnosed with PNETs at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine (Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China) between September 2002 and September 2013 was conducted. The clinicopathological findings, overall survival (OS) rate and disease-free survival (DFS) rate of the patients with PNETs were analyzed. Prognostic factors were determined by univariate and multivariate analyses. A total of 104 patients were selected. The median age at presentation was 52 years (range, 19–76 years). The most common surgical procedure was distal pancreatectomy (51.0%), followed by pancreaticoduodenectomy (27.9%) and local resection of the pancreas (16.3%). The majority of the tumors were of low or moderate grade (93.3%, grade 1 or 2) and were local or regional stage (92.3%). The 1-, 3- and 5-year OS rates were 95, 85 and 73%, respectively. Meanwhile, the 1-, 3- and 5-year DFS rates were 86, 72 and 68%, respectively. The OS and DFS rates were significantly different with regard to the grade (grades 1, 2 and 3; P<0.001) and stage (local, regional and distant disease; P<0.001). Furthermore, patients with a low Ki-67 index experienced superior OS and DFS rates compared with patients with a high Ki-67 index (P<0.001). The presence of lymph node metastasis was predictive of inferior OS and DFS rates compared with the absence of lymph node metastasis (P<0.001). OS rate for PNETs was significantly affected by resection margin status (P<0.001). In multivariable analysis, the significant factors associated with OS rate were stage (P=0.02), grade (P<0.001), lymph node status (P=0.025), Ki-67 index (P=0.031) and resection margin status (P<0.001). Meanwhile, stage (P=0.001), grade (P=0.017), lymph node status (P=0.02) and Ki-67 index (P=0.016) were prognostic factors for DFS rate. In conclusion, grade, stage, Ki-67 index and lymph node involvement are significant prognostic factors for OS and DFS rates in surgically resectable PNETs. Furthermore, surgical margin status may also be an independent predictor for the prognosis of PNETs. It is anticipated that these findings may provide useful predictors of clinical survival, particularly in the setting of resected disease.

IMP3 Immunohistochemical Expression Remains Consistent Among All Grades of Gastrointestinal Neuroendocrine Tumors

Insulin-like growth factor-II messenger RNA-binding protein-3 (IMP3), is an oncofetal protein whose aberrant expression has previously been detected in multiple malignant neoplasms. Pulmonary neuroendocrine carcinomas demonstrate increased expression compared with pulmonary carcinoid tumors, but this relationship has not been studied in gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors (GINETs). This study examined IMP3 expression in GINETs, with a focus on correlation with established grading criteria. Fifty-four GINETs were immunohistochemically studied using a monoclonal antibody against IMP3. Using established World Health Organization criteria, the cases were stratified by grade and included 31 grade 1 neuroendocrine tumors (G1 GINETs), 15 grade 2 neuroendocrine tumors (G2 GINETs), and 8 neuroendocrine carcinomas (GINECs). The majority (51/54, 94.4%) of GINETs demonstrated IMP3 staining. Thirty cases (55.6%) showed IMP3 cytoplasmic/membranous staining in 60% or greater of tumor cells, with moderate to strong staining in nearly all of these cases (29/30; 96.7%). Of the remaining 24 cases, 3 cases showed no staining, whereas 17 (81%) demonstrated weak staining. When stratified by grade, there was no statistically significant difference in IMP3 staining among the 3 grades of GINETs; of the G1 GINETs, 14 (45.2%) demonstrated staining in at least 60% of tumor cells, compared with 10 (66.7%) G2 GINETs and 6 (75%) GINECs. Hindgut neoplasms of any grade were the most likely to show significant IMP3 staining. Unlike what has been demonstrated in neuroendocrine neoplasms in the lungs, GINETs appear to have a consistent IMP3 expression profile among all tumors grades, which may be reflective of their unique tumor biology.

Neuroendocrine tumors of the pancreas: a retrospective single-center analysis using the ENETS TNM-classification and immunohistochemical markers for risk stratification

Background

This study was performed to assess the 2006 introduced ENETS TNM-classification with respect to patient survival and surgical approach for patients who underwent surgery for a neuroendocrine tumor of the pancreas (PNET).

Methods

Between 2001 and 2010 38 patients after resection of a PNET were investigated regarding tumor localization and size. Further, patient survival with regards to the new TNM-classification, the operation methods and immunohistochemical markers was analyzed.

Results

The estimated mean survival time of the 38 patients was 91 ± 10 months (female 116 ± 9, male 56 ± 14 months; p = 0.008). The 5-year survival rate was 63.9%. Patient survival differed significantly depending on tumor size (pT1 107 ± 13, pT2 94 ± 16, pT3 44 ± 7 and pT4 18 ± 14 months; P = 0.006). Patients without lymph node metastasis survived significantly longer compared to patients with positive lymph node status (108 ± 9 vs. 19 ± 5 months; P < 0.001). However, survival in patients with and without distant metastasis did not differ significantly (92 ± 11 vs. 80 ± 23 months; P = 0.876). Further, the tumor grading significantly influenced patient survival (G1 111 ± 12, G2 68 ± 12 and G3 21 ± 14 months; P = 0.037).

Conclusions

As part of the TNM-classification especially lymph node status and also tumor size and grading were identified as important factors determining patient survival. Further, gender was demonstrated to significantly influence survival time. If an R0 resection was achieved in patients with distant metastases patient survival was comparable to patients without metastasis.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12893-015-0033-1) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

The tail of neuroendocrine tumors from lung to pancreas: Two rare case reports

INTRODUCTION

Primary pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors are a well-established disease entity, however, neuroendocrine metastases to the pancreas from other sites have been scarcely documented. Specifically, pancreatic metastases from a pulmonary carcinoid tumor have only previously been described in a single case report.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

We sought to outline our institutional experience of two patients with pulmonary neuroendocrine tumors that developed metastases to the pancreas, confirmed by gross pathology and immunohistochemistry. In both cases, the pancreatic metastases were surgically resected and their pulmonary origin were discovered post-operatively.

DISCUSSION

Our findings should raise awareness to the possibility of metastatic disease when evaluating a pancreatic mass in a patient with a clinical history of pulmonary carcinoid tumor. Expert opinion on immunohistochemically differentiating a primary pancreatic neuroendocrine malignancy from a metastasis should be employed in these cases.

CONCLUSION

Establishing this diagnosis pre-operatively could affect the decision to proceed with surgical resection, given the morbidity of pancreatectomy and the unknown long-term clinical outcome of patients with pulmonary carcinoid tumors metastatic to the pancreas.

Survival and prognostic factors in well-differentiated pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors

OBJECTIVES

Pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (P-NETs) account for 2-3% of all pancreatic neoplasms. The aim of our study was to investigate survival and prognostic factors in patients with P-NETs.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 114 patients diagnosed with well-differentiated P-NETs from 1982 through 2010. We studied demographical, clinical, radiological, and histopathological characteristics.

RESULTS

Median age at diagnosis was 57 years (range 32-83); 53% were men and 78% had nonfunctional tumors. The most common presenting symptoms were abdominal pain (41%), weight loss (36%), and diarrhea (25%); 19% of the tumors were incidental findings. Median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 4 months, 3 months for nonfunctional, and 12 months for functional tumors (p < 0.001). At diagnosis, 32.5% patients had local, 22.8% had regional, and 44.7% had distant disease. Men had more often distant disease at diagnosis (p = 0.02). Median survival was 6.6 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.0-9.2). Overall 5-year survival was 53.9% (95% CI: 43.4-63.3). For those with local disease and those with distant disease at diagnosis, the 5-year survivals were 70.2% (95% CI: 49.9-83.6) and 33.0% (95% CI: 19.7-46.7), respectively. Surgery with curative intent was performed on 46 patients. Newly detected liver metastases were diagnosed up to 10 years after surgery in this group. In patients with metastases, palliative surgery (debulking) did not have a significant effect on survival compared to those who had no surgery.

CONCLUSION

Distant metastases, Ki-67 > 2%, nonfunctional tumors, elevated level of chromogranin A, and palliative treatment were associated with poor survival.