Radiation therapy for mucosal melanoma of the head and neck

Radiation Therapy in the Management of Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (HNMM) is a rare but highly aggressive malignancy, often diagnosed at an advanced stage with poor prognosis. This review discusses current treatment strategies, emphasizing the role of radiotherapy in managing this challenging disease. A comprehensive analysis of 33 studies provides updated information on techniques and outcomes, highlighting the consistent benefit of adjuvant radiation in improving local control. Advances in conformal techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), have significantly reduced toxicity rates. Preliminary data on proton and carbon ion therapies suggest the potential for further enhancement of the therapeutic ratio, despite limited availability. Although recent studies report 3-year local control rates as high as 90%, overall survival within the same time frame remains well below 50-60%, underscoring the need for continued improvement in systemic therapies to address the persistent issue of distant metastases.

A primary oral mucosal melanoma of the hard palate with no recurrence: Report of a 10 years follow-up

BACKGROUND

Primary oral mucosal melanoma (OMM) represents an extremely rare and aggressive tumor that arises from malignant transformation and clonal expansion of melanocytes in the oral cavity. The prognosis of patients affected by OMM is quite unfavorable, with survival rates lower than those described for patients with cutaneous melanoma.

CASE REPORT

Here, we report a case of OMM in a 59-year-old Caucasian woman, who was referred for evaluation of a large asymptomatic pigmented lesion on the left side of the hard palate under the removable total denture. Incisional biopsy was performed, and histopathological analysis revealed the proliferation of spindle-shaped and pigmented epithelioid cells, with cellular pleomorphism. These cells were positive for Melan A, S-100, HMB-45, SOX-10, and Ki-67 confirming the diagnosis of OMM. The patient underwent partial maxillectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. After treatment, she was rehabilitated with a palatal obturator prosthesis and has been in follow-up for 10 years with no evidence of disease. Due to the rarity in the oral cavity and the nonspecific signs and symptoms, the diagnosis of OMM is difficult and often overlooked.

CONCLUSION

Therefore, multidisciplinary management from diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation is important to increase the expectation of cure.

Head and Neck Mucosal Melanoma: Where Are We Now?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To highlight recent and relevant treatment considerations while managing mucosal melanoma.

RECENT FINDINGS

Evidence is building to support the use of targeted therapy and immunotherapy while managing mucosal melanoma. Surgical resection with postoperative radiotherapy plays a major role in managing resectable disease. Recent studies evaluate the addition of targeted, and immunotherapies with an attempt to determine the most efficacious sequence of treatment.

Proceedings from the Melanoma Research Foundation Mucosal Melanoma Meeting (December 16, 2022, New York, USA)

Mucosal melanoma remains a rare cancer with high mortality and a paucity of therapeutic options. This is due in significant part to its low incidence leading to limited patient access to expert care and downstream clinical/basic science data for research interrogation. Clinical challenges such as delayed and at times inaccurate diagnoses, and lack of consensus tumor staging have added to the suboptimal outcomes for these patients. Clinical trials, while promising, have been difficult to activate and accrue. While individual institutions and investigators have attempted to seek solutions to such problems, international, national, and local partnership may provide the keys to more efficient and innovative paths forward. Furthermore, a mucosal melanoma coalition would provide a potential network for patients and caregivers to seek expert opinion and advice. The Melanoma Research Foundation Mucosal Melanoma Meeting (December 16, 2022, New York, USA) highlighted the current clinical challenges faced by patients, providers, and scientists, identified current and future clinical trial investigations in this rare disease space, and aimed to increase national and international collaboration among the mucosal melanoma community in an effort to improve patient outcomes. The included proceedings highlight the clinical challenges of mucosal melanoma, global clinical trial experience, basic science advances in mucosal melanoma, and future directions, including the creation of shared rare tumor registries and enhanced collaborations.

PRAME Staining in Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (MM) is a rare, aggressive melanoma subtype. Complete surgical excision, with or without adjuvant radiotherapy, remains the cornerstone of treatment and yields adequate locoregional control. Metastatic MM is managed similarly to metastatic cutaneous melanoma but with poorer survival. PReferentially expressed Antigen in MElanoma (PRAME) has been identified as a potential diagnostic marker and therapeutic target in the treatment of cutaneous melanoma.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of the clinical characteristics and immunohistochemical features of all sinonasal MM patients referred to the department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, UMC Utrecht Cancer Center, between 2011 and 2021 was performed. Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array and next-generation sequencing (NGS) were performed in selected cases.

RESULTS

A total of 26 patients with an MM were included. The median follow-up duration was 15 months. At the end of follow-up, 13 patients had died due to progression of their disease, and one patient died of intercurrent disease. PRAME immunohistochemistry was performed in 23 out of 26 cases, all displaying PRAME expression. In two cases PRAME expression was present both within the melanoma cells and in melanocytes in adjacent mucosa. SNP array showed ≥ 5 copy number variants (CNV) in all tested cases, with a median of 29.5 CNVs (IQR 23.25-40). The three most common mutations identified by NGS were NRAS (7 cases) and NF1 (2 cases).

CONCLUSION

We show that expression of PRAME is common in sinonasal MM, making PRAME a useful ancillary diagnostic tool and a potential therapeutic target in sinonasal MM. The demonstrated occurrence of extensive presence of PRAME-positive melanocytes in the surrounding mucosa of sinonasal MM might explain the multifocal nature of melanoma in the (sinonasal) mucosa, and would be an extra argument for a PRAME targeting treatment in preventing local disease recurrence.

The Role of Hedgehog Signaling in the Melanoma Tumor Bone Microenvironment

A crucial regulator in melanoma progression and treatment resistance is tumor microenvironments, and Hedgehog (Hh) signals activated in a tumor bone microenvironment are a potential new therapeutic target. The mechanism of bone destruction by melanomas involving Hh/Gli signaling in such a tumor microenvironment is unknown. Here, we analyzed surgically resected oral malignant melanoma specimens and observed that Sonic Hedgehog, Gli1, and Gli2 were highly expressed in tumor cells, vasculatures, and osteoclasts. We established a tumor bone destruction mouse model by inoculating B16 cells into the bone marrow space of the right tibial metaphysis of 5-week-old female C57BL mice. An intraperitoneal administration of GANT61 (40 mg/kg), a small-molecule inhibitor of Gli1 and Gli2, resulted in significant inhibition of cortical bone destruction, TRAP-positive osteoclasts within the cortical bone, and endomucin-positive tumor vessels. The gene set enrichment analysis suggested that genes involved in apoptosis, angiogenesis, and the PD-L1 expression pathway in cancer were significantly altered by the GANT61 treatment. A flow cytometry analysis revealed that PD-L1 expression was significantly decreased in cells in which late apoptosis was induced by the GANT61 treatment. These results suggest that molecular targeting of Gli1 and Gli2 may release immunosuppression of the tumor bone microenvironment through normalization of abnormal angiogenesis and bone remodeling in advanced melanoma with jaw bone invasion.

Primary mucosal melanoma of the larynx: systematic review of the literature and qualitative synthesis

PURPOSE

Primary mucosal melanoma of the larynx (PLM) is a rare entity among head and neck cancers. Due to its rarity, clear protocols of management are not available. A deeper knowledge of the clinical and biological behaviour of PLM is strongly needed.

METHODS

According to PRISMA process, we searched through electronic databases case reports, case series and review articles providing relevant clinical data. The survival analysis was performed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves, using disease free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) as endpoints.

RESULTS

1074 articles were initially screened, of which 37 studies describing 44 PLM cases were selected and included in the analysis. Mean age was 59.7 years with a mean follow-up time of 25.4 months. The most common symptom at presentation was hoarseness (52%), while the most involved laryngeal subsite was supraglottic region (62%). Most patients presented with an advanced stage. Tumour (T) and node (N) status at presentation did not influence OS nor DFS, whereas distant metastases (M) status resulted significantly associated with the reduction of OS and DFS time (Mantel-Cox: p < 0.0001 and p = 0.001, respectively). The laryngeal subsite and the type of surgery performed did not significantly impact on OS and DFS.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment for PLM remains debated. Surgery with safe margins is recommended due to the high rates of local recurrence. Systemic therapy is advised for metastatic disease. However, the prognosis remains poor even after radical resection or targeted therapy.

National Effort to Re-Establish Heavy Ion Cancer Therapy in the United States

In this review, we attempt to make a case for the establishment of a limited number of heavy ion cancer research and treatment facilities in the United States. Based on the basic physics and biology research, conducted largely in Japan and Germany, and early phase clinical trials involving a relatively small number of patients, we believe that heavy ions have a considerably greater potential to enhance the therapeutic ratio for many cancer types compared to conventional X-ray and proton radiotherapy. Moreover, with ongoing technological developments and with research in physical, biological, immunological, and clinical aspects, it is quite plausible that cost effectiveness of radiotherapy with heavier ions can be substantially improved.

The Role of Particle Therapy in Adenoid Cystic Carcinoma and Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck

Particle irradiation is suitable for resistant histologies owing to a combination of improved dose delivery with potential radiobiologic advantages in high linear energy transfer radiation. Within the head and neck, adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucosal melanoma are two such histologies, being radioresistant and lying closely proximal to critical structures. Here, we review the use of particle irradiation for adenoid cystic carcinoma and mucosal melanoma of the head and neck.

Importance of Margins, Radiotherapy, and Systemic Therapy in Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS

The ideal strategy in the treatment of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck (MMHN) remains unclear. Our objective was to evaluate the importance of surgical margins, radiotherapy, and systemic therapy in MMHN.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective Single Institutional Review.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with MMHN treated at a tertiary care oncology center between 1999 and 2016.

RESULTS

Seventy-six patients were included, 60 of whom were treated with curative intent. Negative or close margins compared with positive margins were associated with higher 3-year overall survival (OS) (62% vs. 29% vs. 13% P = .012), disease-free survival (33% vs. 29% vs. 4% P = .003), and distant control (48% vs. 29% vs. 22% P = .039). Cases with pre-/postoperative radiotherapy had a marginally higher locoregional control versus without (69% vs. 59%, P = .117). Immunotherapy for recurrent and/or metastatic disease was associated with an increase in 3-year OS (15% vs. 3% P = .01).

CONCLUSION

Achieving negative surgical margins is relevant in disease control. Despite small sample size, our data suggest that radiotherapy may enhance surgical outcomes. Immunotherapy has therapeutic benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 2021.

Radiation treatment for adult rare cancers: Oldest and newest indication

AIM

Aim of this analysis is to review the role of RT in the management of several rare tumors for adult patients.

METHODS

Collection data regarding RT and rare tumors was made by Pubmed.

RESULTS

For mucosal melanomas, RT is prescribed, being associated with lower local recurrence rate. For trachea tumors, RT was used as adjuvant or salvage treatment for unresectable disease. For pNET, RT can be a suitable option for post-surgical or unresectable/borderline. For bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors the role of adjuvant treatments is uncertain. For hepatobiliary and ovarian malignancy, stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is a promising approach. For soft tissue sarcoma, perioperative treatments are indicated, and a growing role of SBRT in oligometastatic disease is recognized. For endocrine tumors, adjuvant RT has demonstrated benefits through reducing recurrence risk.

CONCLUSION

The radiotherapy is a frequent indication in adult rare cancers; thus the role of Radiation Oncologist must not be neglected.

Internal carotid artery rupture successfully rescued after resection of locally advanced mucosal malignant melanoma of the eustachian tube: a case report

Mucosal melanoma of the eustachian tube is a rare and highly malignant tumour. Local radical resection combined with radiotherapy and systemic chemotherapy is a classic treatment strategy for this tumour. The internal carotid artery (ICA) is easily damaged when this tumour is removed. Once the ICA ruptures and causes haemorrhage, it can be fatal. We report a case of mucosal malignant melanoma of the eustachian tube with ICA rupture and haemorrhage in a 62-year-old woman 3 days after resection of the tumour. After successful emergency endotracheal intubation, anti-shock treatment was performed. Further, the ICA was examined using digital subtraction angiography under general anaesthesia and the bleeding site was embolized. The patient recovered uneventfully after surgery and was discharged from hospital without hemiplegia, aphasia, or other intracranial complications. Because of economic reasons, the patient discontinued comprehensive treatment after being discharged from the hospital. Finally, she developed bone and kidney metastases 8 months after surgery and died of distant metastases 1.5 years later. When removing eustachian tube lesions, the ICA must be particularly protected. Once the ICA ruptures and there is postoperative haemorrhage, prevention of airway asphyxia, timely anti-shock treatment, and emergency digital subtraction angiography and vascular embolization are effective treatment methods.

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma: a 10-year experience of 36 cases in China

Background

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare tumor with a poor prognosis. This study aimed to assess the clinical and imaging features, progression, treatment, and possible prognostic factors of SNMM.

Methods

Thirty-six patients with SNMM were retrospectively reviewed in the Department of Otolaryngology & Head and Neck Surgery of Xinhua Hospital from January 2008 to December 2017.

Results

The age of the first diagnosis was 67.4±10.8 years; the most common clinical symptoms included epistaxis, nasal obstruction, headache, and facial pain. Most tumors originated in the nasal cavity (63.9%) and at stage IV (77.8%). Melanin in melanoma showed typical signal intensity on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), T1WI had high signal while T2WI had low signal. 41.6% of patients had the typical MRI findings. Treatment included surgery, surgery with radiotherapy, and radiotherapy only. The follow-up time ranged from 4 to 96 months, with a median time of 22 months, 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS is 80.6%, 36.1%, and 13.9%, respectively. The 3-year OS was better in cases in the T3 stage than the T4 stage (P=0.02). However, tumors that originated from the paranasal sinus had a poorer prognosis than the nasal cavity (P=0.04). The cases receiving postoperative radiotherapy showed poorer prognosis (P=0.02). Other factors were not found to be associated with prognosis, including gender, age, lymph node metastasis, distant metastasis, computed tomography (CT) enhancement, and typical MRI findings.

Conclusions

The SNMM was a devastating tumor with poor outcomes; most cases were diagnosed at late stages, which may account for poor prognosis. Tumors with melanin feature MRI findings do not have a better prognosis. The treatment of postoperative radiotherapy is still controversial.

Efficacy and safety of carbon-ion radiotherapy for the malignant melanoma: A systematic review

Malignant melanomas (MMs) were the fifth most common cancer in men and the sixth most common cancer in women in 2018, respectively. These are characterized by high metastatic rates and poor prognoses. We systematically reviewed safety and efficacy of carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT) for treating MMs. Eleven studies were eligible for review, and the data showed that MM patients showed better local control with low recurrence and mild toxicities after CIRT. Survival rates were slightly higher in patients with cutaneous or uveal MMs than in those with mucosal MMs. CIRT in combination with chemotherapy produced higher progression-free survival rates than CIRT only. In younger patients, higher rates of distant metastases of gynecological MMs were observed. The data indicated that CIRT is effective and safe for treating MMs; however, a combination with systemic therapy is recommended to ensure the best possible prognosis for MMs.

Survival of oral mucosal melanoma according to treatment, tumour resection margin, and metastases

Because of the poor prognosis and of oral mucosal melanoma, and patients' short survival, large, randomised, clinical studies are difficult. We have investigated its demographic characteristics and analysed the effect of treatment, resection margins, and metastases on survival. We recorded age, sex, site of primary tumour, and types of treatment, survival, and metastases in 74 patients treated at the Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Seoul National University Dental Hospital. Survival was analysed based on bony invasion, depth of invasion, and resection margins, and we found that it varied depending on the primary site (p=0.002), and declined with liver (p=0.001) or brain (p=0.033) metastases. The two-year survival according to the primary site was as follows: palate 85% (n=32), anterior maxillary gingiva 53% (n=13), mandible 58% (n=13), and posterior maxillary gingival 74% (n=10) and buccal mucosa 50% (n=4). The two-year survival was 34% (n=8) in patients with liver metastases and 23% (n=7) in patients with brain metastases. In cases of bony invasion (p=0.005), depth of invasion (p=0.042), unclear resection margin (p=0.023), or higher T stages (p=0.009), the survival declined considerably. Neck dissection did not affect survival (p=0.343). Survival of the patients given chemotherapy was significantly lower (p=0.013) and the two-year survival was 54.0%. The patients given radiotherapy showed no significant difference in survival compared with those not given radiotherapy (p=0.107). In conclusion, primary site, bony invasion, resection margins, depth of invasion and systemic metastases were critical to predict prognosis and selection of treatment of oral mucosal melanoma.

Prognosis of endoscopic surgery and traditional open resection in mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus

Mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus is always associated with poor prognosis, and 5-year overall survival does not exceed 40%. Our study aimed to compare the intraoperative conditions and prognosis of different surgical techniques to determine the optimum surgical approach for patients with mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus. This was a retrospective analysis of 54 patients who received treatment at Beijing Tongren Hospital between January 2004 and December 2016. The patients were divided into two groups: those who received endoscopic surgery and those who underwent traditional open resection. The study analyzed the operative methods, the intraoperative conditions, and the prognosis of the patients. SAS JMP Pro software was used for statistical analysis of the data. There were 27 patients in the endoscopic surgery group and 27 patients in the open surgery group. Each group had the same distribution in terms of AJCC staging, with seven stage III, 12 stage IVA, and eight stage IVB patients in each group. There were statistically significant differences in operative time, complications, and cosmetic effects between the two groups, but no difference in local recurrence, disease-free survival, or overall survival. In the endoscopic surgery group and open surgery group, local recurrence rates were 14.81 and 11.11%, respectively, and metastasis rates were the same in both groups (40.74%). With regard to long-term prognosis, there was no statistically significant difference between the different surgical techniques, especially in terms of survival benefit. We believe that endoscopic surgery with protection of local function can be recommended for mucosal melanoma of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinus on the basis of its advantages in terms of shorter duration of surgery and fewer complications. In addition, it achieves better postoperative cosmetic effects with minimal scarring on the face of the patient, and thus improves postoperative quality of life.

Open Versus Endoscopic Approach for Sinonasal Melanoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background

Open resection (OR) of sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNM) traditionally has been the gold standard for treatment. However, endoscopic resection (ER) has recently become a surgical alternative. The aim of this study was to compare survival outcomes between OR and ER of SNM.

Methods

A literature search encompassing PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Google Scholar was performed. Two reviewers independently screened for original studies comparing survival outcomes between OR and ER for SNM. Data were systematically collected on study design, patient demographics, outcomes, and level of evidence. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale (NOS). Meta-analysis of overall survival and disease-free survival was performed using random-effects models.

Results

The initial search yielded 2078 abstracts, of which 9 cohort studies were included for a total of 510 patients from 6 different countries. The average quality of all included studies using the NOS was 7.7 stars. Six out of 7 studies reported no differences in the stages of SNM between patients receiving ER versus OR. Overall survival was longer in the ER group versus OR group (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.68, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.49–0.95). There was no significant difference in disease-free survival between groups (HR: 0.59, 95% CI: 0.28–1.25).

Conclusion

Based on the available literature, an endoscopic approach for SNM resection has survival outcomes that are similar or greater compared to an open approach.

Updates in the management of sinonasal mucosal melanoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis. Although there is significant study surrounding the treatment of sinonasal malignancies and cutaneous melanomas, the rarity of this tumor has largely precluded robust outcomes analyses. The authors of this review seek to provide an overview of the recent literature related to the treatment of SNMM with added context from our institutional experience with this disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

In the surgical management of sinonasal malignancies and SNMM specifically, resection via endoscopic endonasal technique appears to offer comparable oncologic outcomes versus an open approach. The role of adjuvant therapy continues to be debated, but there is strong evidence for improved rates of local control with radiotherapy after complete resection. In the last few years, significant developments have been made in the study of systemic therapies for cutaneous melanoma. The identification of genetic mutations common to mucosal melanoma has allowed for early trials of targeted therapies, but study is ongoing.

SUMMARY

Although the study of SNMM is largely limited to small retrospective case series, treatment continues to evolve. Until effective systemic therapies can be identified, endoscopic resection with adjuvant radiotherapy may offer the best disease-free survival with acceptably low morbidity.

Radiotherapy alone as a method of treatment for sinonasal mucosal melanoma: A report based on six cases and a review of current opinion

Objectives

Radiotherapy in patients with sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) was given as alternative treatment to surgery in cases with advanced, inoperable tumors or those not eligible for surgery. We presented the outcomes for patients with SNMM treated with radiotherapy alone.

Material and methods

The retrospective review of 6 consecutive SNMM (nasal cavity - 4 pts. and paranasal sinus - 2 pts.) patients (3 males and 3 females at mean age 64 years) treated between 2008 and 2016 was presented. The stage of disease was: T3 (1 pt.), T4a (3 pts.), T4b (2 pts.); with N0 and M0 in all patients. All patients underwent definitive primary photon radiotherapy (IMRT) alone; dose 66-72 Gy was delivered in 22-24 fractions given in 5 fractions (3 Gy) a week.

Results

The complete remission was observed in all our patients but only one patient survived 5 years without disease. Five patients died due to multiple distant metastases; two of those patients developed associated local recurrence 7-8 months after radiotherapy.

Conclusion

SNMM has a poor prognosis due to its high metastatic potential. Based on our numerically small report and data from literature we concluded that primary radiotherapy alone assured complete remission and even 5-year disease-free survival in only a few individual patients.

Contemporary Treatment Approaches to Sinonasal Mucosal Melanoma

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is a rare oncological entity that comprises most head and neck mucosal melanomas. SNMM has distinctive genetic background, different from cutaneous melanoma. Survival outcomes among SNMM patients are poor; while there is no clear consensus on the optimal management of SNMM, the primary treatment modality is generally considered to be wide surgical excision, and radiation therapy (RT) is often used in the postoperative adjuvant setting to improve locoregional control. Systemic therapies have demonstrated little or no survival benefit, and most SNMM patients die of distant metastatic disease. Owing to the rarity of the disease, the literature describing treatment approaches for SNMM is lacking and largely limited to isolated case reports and retrospective series. Here, we describe contemporary diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to SNMM based on the most recent molecular and outcome data.

Local control in sinonasal malignant melanoma: Comparing conventional to hypofractionated radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to analyze the effect of fractionation schedule on local control in postoperative radiotherapy (RT) for sinonasal malignant melanoma.

METHODS

Sixty-three patients who were treated with surgery and postoperative RT in 4 accredited head and neck cancer centers in the Netherlands between 1998 and 2013 were retrospectively studied. Outcomes with conventional fractionation (2-2.4 Gy per fraction; n = 27) were compared to hypofractionation (4-6 Gy per fraction; n = 36). The primary endpoint was local control and the secondary endpoint was toxicity.

RESULTS

Comparable local control rates were found after 2 and 5 years (63% vs 64% and 47% vs 53%; P = .73 for, respectively, conventional fractionation vs hypofractionation). Local recurrences were predominantly present ipsilateral (92%) and within the irradiated volume (88%). Late toxicity grade ≥ 3 was observed in 2 of 63 patients, 1 patient in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Radiotherapy fractionation schedule did not influence the local control rate or the incidence of late toxicity in patients treated with surgery and RT for sinonasal malignant melanoma in this retrospective analysis. Due to this retrospective nature and the limited number of patients, strong recommendations cannot be made. Expected toxicity, patient convenience, and workload may be taken into account for the choice of fractionation schedule until conclusive evidence becomes available.

The Prognostic Role of the Surgical Approach and Adjuvant Therapy in Operable Mucosal Melanoma of the Head and Neck

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the prognostic impact of the surgical approach and adjuvant treatment in operable malignant melanoma of head and neck (MMHN).

Methods

Retrospective reviews of 31 patients who underwent surgery-based treatment with curative intent, either by the endoscopic or external approach, for MMHN were performed to analyze recurrence patterns, salvage modalities, and oncological outcomes (disease-specific survival and disease-free survival).

Results

Overall recurrence rate was 61% (19/31). In stage III patients (n=24), 50% (12/24) developed recurrences with a median recurrence-free period of 6.0 months, and 30% (4/12) of them was successfully salvaged by reoperation with adjuvant radiotherapy. On the contrary, all stage IVA patients (n=7) developed recurrences with a median recurrence-free period of 4.4 months. Distant metastasis was the most common pattern of failure and no patients were salvaged. Among variables, age and T classification, not the surgical approach, were significant prognosticators for disease-free survival and disease-specific survival. Adjuvant radiotherapy was associated with a lower rate of local failure, compared to surgery alone (hazard ratio, 0.02; 95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 0.75; P=0.02). However, adjuvant systemic therapy was not effective in reducing the risk of failures for any pattern.

Conclusion

Our data suggested that meticulous surgical resection, either by the endoscopic or external approach, with adjuvant radiotherapy increases the local control rate in MMHN.

Biopanel identifies expression status of targetable proteins in sinonasal melanoma

BACKGROUND

Advanced stage at presentation, lack of BRAF mutations and overall rarity pose unique challenges to the therapy and trial design in sinonasal melanoma.

METHODS

Here, we assessed the expression status of 12 proteins in two independent cohorts of sinonasal melanoma (n = 20).

RESULTS

Each case showed expression of at least one protein (KIT, TP53, MYC, HER2, EGFR, MET, VEGFR, BRAF V600E and/or MDM2), whereas lack of ALK, FLI1 and PDGFRα expression underscores differences to cutaneous melanoma. Comparison of marker frequencies to a metareview of the literature indicates that MYC, HER2, EGFR and MET had not been previously assessed.

CONCLUSION

Expression of at least one potentially targetable protein per case illustrates proteome pathway profiling as one starting point for marker stratified trial design.

Outcomes of mucosal melanoma of the head and neck

INTRODUCTION

Mucosal melanoma of the head and neck is a rare disease with limited data available on outcomes; therefore, we reviewed our institutional experience.

METHODS

An institutional database was queried and 38 patients with head and neck mucosal melanoma were identified. Charts were abstracted and local control (LC), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were calculated.

RESULTS

Most patients had T4 disease (86%), although nodes were positive in 11%. En bloc or endoscopic resection was performed on 93%. Adjuvant or definitive radiotherapy to a median dose of 60 Gy was utilized in 90%. Chemotherapy was given in 21%, and 16% received interferon. Three-year LC, PFS and OS were 90%, 48% and 59%, respectively. Median OS was 4.6 years. Site of first failure was distant in 52% of cases.

CONCLUSION

With aggressive therapy median OS was 4.6 years in this cohort. Distant recurrence remains the primary mode of failure. It may be reasonable to include mucosal melanoma patients in trials of systemic agents along with high-risk cutaneous melanomas.

Evaluation of the prognostic impact of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy on head and neck mucosal melanoma: a meta-analysis

Background

Head and neck mucosal melanoma (HNMM) is a rare type of malignant tumor that frequently exhibits postoperative recurrence and distant metastasis. Many clinicians administer postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy to improve patient prognosis and enhance quality of life; however, the effects of this treatment remain controversial. Therefore, in this study, a meta-analysis was performed to evaluate the practical value of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy for head and neck mucosal melanoma.

Methods

Articles in the PubMed, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, Web of Science and EMBASE databases were systematically retrieved. Analyses were conducted to compare the impact of treatments involving postoperative radiotherapy with treatments entailing surgery alone on patient overall survival time, local recurrence and distant metastasis. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to evaluate the time-to-event data employing RevMan version 5.2 and Stata/SE version 13.0 software according to the principles specified for systematic reviews of interventions in the Cochrane handbook.

Results

Twelve cohort studies involving 1593 patients satisfied the desired conditions. In comparing surgery alone with postoperative radiotherapy, there was no significant difference regarding a decrease in the death risk in HNMM patients (HR, 1.07; 95 % CI, 0.95–1.2; p = 0.903; low heterogeneity, I² = 0); this was also the case for sinonasal melanoma after subgroup meta-analysis (HR, 1.04; 95 % CI, 0.8–1.36; p = 0.983; low heterogeneity, I² = 0 %). A sensitivity analysis and subgroup meta-analysis showed that disease progression was the main source of the instability in the results. Surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy reduced the risk of local recurrence (HR, 0.51; 95 % CI, 0.35–0.76; p = 0.155) but did not reduce the risk of distant metastasis (HR, 2.26; 95 % CI, 1.01–5.05; p = 0.006).

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that for HNMM patients surgery is recommended if indicated, and surgery combined with postoperative radiotherapy is also recommended for dramatically improved local control of the tumor bed. For patients not suitable for surgical treatment, radiotherapy is still advised. To control distant metastasis and finally lower the risk of death, immunological therapy is another potential option whose therapeutic effect needs to be proved with more data from clinical trials.

Primary Malignant Melanoma of the Lip: A Report of 48 Cases

PURPOSE

Lip melanoma (LM) is a rare malignant tumor and well-established treatment protocols for it are in short supply. The objective of this study was to evaluate the outcome of treatment modalities and explore the prognostic factors.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A retrospective chart review was performed on 48 patients with primary LM treated in the authors' hospital from January 1992 to November 2013. The clinical characteristics and treatment modalities were identified and correlated with the outcomes.

RESULTS

The 5-year overall survival (OS) rate was 56.1%, and the rate of cervical lymph node (CLN) metastasis was 46% (22 of 48). A tumor of at least 4 cm (P = .001), nodular types (P = .003), and CLN (P < .0001) were independent prognostic factors for OS. Twenty-five patients died during follow-up, mainly from to neck recurrence (14 of 25). Chemotherapy significantly improved the 5-year OS rate in patients with stage IV LM (P = .03), but not in those with stage III (P = .8).

CONCLUSIONS

LM has a lower CLN and distant metastasis rate and a better prognosis than other oral mucosal melanomas. A long history of melanin pigmentation is a dangerous sign for all patients, and smoking seems to be associated with LM in male patients. Tumor size (≥4 cm), nodular type, and CLN positivity are poor prognostic factors. A wide excision with close observation is advocated as the primary treatment for stage III LM. Adjuvant chemotherapy is useful for patients with stage IV cancer, but not for those with stage III.

Unknown primary nasopharyngeal melanoma presenting as severe recurrent epistaxis and hearing loss following treatment and remission of metastatic disease: A case report and literature review

•

Nasopharyngeal mucosal melanoma is a rare pathology with an unclear etiology and oftentimes obscure clinical presentation.

•

We present a report of a lady who had a complete response to systemic treatment of metastatic melanoma of unknown origin.

•

Six years later, a diagnosis of primary nasopharyngeal melanoma was made after an extensive work-up for recurrent symptoms of severe right-sided epistaxis and hearing loss.

•

Surgical resection was performed followed by radiation therapy. The patient has since been without evidence of recurrent or metastatic disease and resolution of bleeding.

Introduction

Primary nasopharyngeal melanoma is an exceedingly rare pathology with unclear etiology and oftentimes obscure clinical presentation. Despite improved diagnostic capabilities, these lesions are often diagnosed at an advanced stage and associated prognosis is poor, partly due to high rates of recurrences and metastasis.

Presentation of case

A 74-year-old woman was diagnosed with metastatic melanoma to the liver, of unknown primary. Just prior to the time of diagnosis, she experienced several episodes of severe epistaxis which she managed conservatively. Her symptoms eventually subsided without further medical evaluation. The patient was initially treated with interleukin-2 (IL-2) for her advanced disease, but her cancer progressed. She was then enrolled in a protocol for percutaneous hepatic perfusion (PHP) with melphalan and had complete radiographic resolution of disease, yet her nosebleeds recurred and persisted despite conservative measures. Six years after her initial diagnosis, a nasopharyngoscopy demonstrated a pigmented lesion in the posterior nasopharynx. Surgical resection was performed (pathology consistent with mucosal melanoma) followed by radiation therapy. She has since had complete resolution of bleeding and shows no evidence of cancer.

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first report of a diagnosis of primary nasopharyngeal melanoma 6-years following complete remission of metastatic disease. Surgery remains the primary treatment for disease and symptom control in this setting.

Conclusion

Timely diagnosis of nasopharyngeal melanomas remains challenging. Thorough clinical evaluations should be performed in such patients, and attention should be paid to recurrent and persistent symptoms, such as epistaxis and hearing loss. This may allow for earlier detection of primary disease.

The role of radiation therapy in melanoma

Although melanoma was historically thought to be radiation resistant, there are limited data to support the use of adjuvant radiation therapy for certain situations at increased risk for locoregional recurrence. High-risk primary tumor features include thickness, ulceration, certain anatomic locations, satellitosis, desmoplastic/neurotropic features, and head and neck mucosal and anorectal melanoma. Lentigo maligna can be effectively treated with either adjuvant or definitive radiation therapy. Some retrospective and prospective randomized studies support the use of adjuvant radiation to improve regional control after lymph node dissection for high-risk nodal metastatic disease. Consensus on the optimal radiation doses and fractionation is lacking.

Surgical management of recurrent sinonasal mucosal melanoma: endoscopic or transfacial resection

Sinonasal mucosal melanoma (SNMM) is associated with poor prognosis. Local recurrence is common and represents a major problem in the therapy. Wide resection surgery is usually applied. However, given the almost futile prognosis, optimal symptom control may be preferable to wide resection at all costs. The aim of our study was to analyze the outcome in patients with recurrent SNMM treated by transfacial radical surgery or by a less invasive endoscopically controlled approach. Patients with recurrent grade III or IV staged SNMM who presented to our ENT department between 2000 and 2010 were either treated by transfacial (n = 10) or endoscopically controlled surgery (n = 12). The patients' charts were reviewed for clinical symptoms, relapse-free time and survival time. Clinical symptoms improved after surgery. The morbidity after endoscopic surgery was significantly lower than after transfacial surgery. The chosen surgical technique did neither affect relapse-free nor survival time. When treating recurrent SNMM, the comparatively gentle and less mutilating endoscopic approach proved to be a sufficient surgical procedure, being not inferior to aggressive surgery with respect to recurrence and survival rate.

Radiation therapy for advanced and metastatic melanoma

Radiation therapy (RT) is an important modality in cancer treatment. However, the general perception is that melanoma is radio-resistant. High quality clinical trials are helping to establish the place of RT in select scenarios of advanced disease at primary, regional, and distant sites. New RT techniques need to be integrated with effective new systemic therapies within a multidisciplinary environment to ensure optimum patient outcomes. It is important that radiation oncologists embrace this opportunity.