Has Self-reported Marijuana Use Changed in Patients Undergoing Total Joint Arthroplasty After the Legalization of Marijuana?

Cannabis Use Is Associated With Fewer Filled Opioid Prescriptions After Treatment of Proximal Humerus Fractures

The purpose of this study was to use a large claims database to determine if there is a difference in opioid use after operative intervention for proximal humerus fractures in patients with known cannabis use compared with those who do not report cannabis use. The PearlDiver database was queried to find all patients who underwent proximal humerus open reduction and internal fixation. A group of patients with reported cannabis use or dependence was matched to a cohort without known cannabis use. Between the two groups, differences in the number of opioid prescriptions filled in the postoperative period (within 3 days), the morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) prescribed in total and per day, and the number of opioid prescription refills were explored. There were 66,445 potential control patients compared with 1260 potential study patients. After conducting the propensity score match, a total of 1245 patients were included in each group. The patients in the cannabis group filled fewer opioid prescriptions (P=.045) and were prescribed fewer total MMEs (P=.044) in the first 3 days postoperatively. Results of this study indicate that patients who use cannabis products may use fewer opioids after proximal humerus open reduction and internal fixation. [Orthopedics. 2024;47(3):147-151.].

Cannabis Use Following Total Joint Arthroplasty is Associated With Increased Risks? A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

With the increased legalization of cannabis, a new unknown emerges for orthopaedic surgeons and their patients. This systematic review aimed to (1) evaluate complications of cannabis use; (2) determine the effects of cannabis on pain and opioid consumption; and (3) evaluate healthcare utilizations associated with cannabis use among patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

METHODS

A systematic review was performed. A search of the literature was performed in 5 databases. We included studies between January 2012 and July 2022 reporting cannabis use and complications, pain management, opioid consumption, length of stay, costs, or functional outcomes following TJA. A meta-analysis of odds ratios (ORs) and continuous variables was performed. A total of 19 articles were included in our final analysis.

RESULTS

Cannabis use was associated with higher odds for deep vein thrombosis (DVT) (OR: 1.46, 95% Confidence Interval [CI]: 1.13 to 1.89) and revisions (OR: 1.47 [95% CI: 1.41 to 1.53]) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Cannabis use was associated with similar odds for DVT in total hip arthroplasty (THA) (OR: 1.30 [95% CI: 0.79 to 2.13]), pulmonary embolus in both TKA (OR: 1.29 [95% CI: 0.95 to 1.77]), THA (OR: 0.55 [95% CI: 0.09 to 3.28]), and cardiovascular complications in TKA (OR: 1.97 [95% Cl: 0.93 to 4.14]). Cannabis use did not alter pain scores, opioid consumption, or cost of care in THA (estimate: $2,550.51 [95% CI: $356.58 to $5,457.62]) but was associated with higher costs in TKA (estimate: $3,552.46 [95% CI: $1,729.71 to $5,375.22]). There was no difference in lengths of stay or functional outcomes; however, there may be a potentially increased risk for prosthetic complications, pneumonia, and cerebrovascular accidents among cannabis users.

CONCLUSION

Cannabis use may be associated with an increased risk of DVTs, revisions, pneumonia, cerebrovascular accidents, and cardiac complications after TJA. Higher-level studies are needed to ascertain the impact of cannabis use for patients undergoing TJA.

Perceptions of Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Surgeons About Medical Cannabidiol Use: A Survey Study

INTRODUCTION

Multiple studies exist identifying cannabidiol (CBD) as an effective part of an orthopaedic patient's pain regimen; however, there is a paucity of studies elucidating orthopaedic surgeons' perception of the use and prescription of CBD in the medical setting. This study surveys orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons about their previous education on and current perceptions and usage of CBD in their medical practice.

METHODS

Between April 2023 and July 2023, orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons from across the country were surveyed. This survey was designed in hopes of identifying physician perceptions and current use of CBD as well as their previous education and training on its use.

RESULTS

Overall, 75 orthopaedic surgeons responded. More than three-fourths of responders had not received formal education on medical CBD use, nor did they have partners or colleagues who used CBD in their practice. More than half of all surgeons believed that there is a stigma associated with CBD use. A higher proportion of surgeons from CBD legal states recommended CBD to help patients control their pain (53.7% vs. 37.5%). Less than 15% of responders believed that CBD can adversely affect surgical outcomes. Finally, four-fifths of all responders believed that CBD is easy to legally access and affordable to buy by patients who desire it.

DISCUSSION

The relative novelty of CBD inclusion in medicine has led to a lack of early education and overall experience with its use among orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons. Still, surgeons believe that CBD is a safe and effective option to control pain. As surgeons continue to gain more familiarity and trust with CBD's medical uses over time, it has the potential to be a mainstay in orthopaedic multimodal pain regimens.

Cannabis Use Is Associated With Increased Use of Prescription Opioids Following Posterior Lumbar Spinal Fusion Surgery

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective review.

OBJECTIVES

Cannabis is an antinociceptive which has been evaluated as a possible adjunct or substitute for opioid use in the treatment of acute pain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between preoperative cannabis usage and consumption of opioids for postoperative analgesia.

METHODS

Patients who underwent one- or two-level posterior lumbar fusion surgery were categorized as cannabis users or non-cannabis users based on preoperative diagnoses of cannabis use. Total morphine equivalent dose was calculated for both in-house opioid consumption and postoperative prescription opioid usage. Age, ASA, BMI, depression, tobacco use, estimated blood loss, OR time, LOS, disposition to rehab, 30-day readmission, in-house opioid consumption and postoperative prescription opioid usage were compared between groups using t-tests.

RESULTS

Of the 220 opioid naïve patients, 29 (13%) patients were identified as cannabis users while 191 (87%) were non-cannabis users. There were no significant associations between opioid naïve cannabis usage and ASA, BMI, tobacco use, EBL, OR time, LOS, disposition to rehab, or readmission. Opioid naïve cannabis users had greater association with depression (31.3% vs 13.7%, P=.017) and younger age (56.37 years vs 65.37 years, P<.001). Interestingly, cannabis use was associated with a lower Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI), with 1.38 vs 2.49 (P=.002). Cannabis users were found to have increased postoperative prescription opioid usage (2545.41 POST-MED vs 1379.72 POST-MED, P=.019).

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis usage is associated with increased usage of opioids postoperatively, both while in-patient and post-discharge, after posterior lumbar spinal fusion surgery.

Health, safety, and socioeconomic impacts of cannabis liberalization laws: An evidence and gap map

Background

Globally, cannabis laws and regulations are rapidly changing. Countries are increasingly permitting access to cannabis under various decriminalization, medicalization, and legalization laws. With strong economic, public health, and social justice incentives driving these domestic cannabis policy reforms, liberalization trends are bound to continue. However, despite a large and growing body of interdisciplinary research addressing the policy-relevant health, safety, and socioeconomic consequences of cannabis liberalization, there is a lack of robust primary and systematic research that comprehensively investigates the consequences of these reforms.

Objectives

This evidence and gap map (EGM) summarizes the empirical evidence on cannabis liberalization policies. Primary objectives were to develop a conceptual framework linking cannabis liberalization policies to relevant outcomes, descriptively summarize the empirical evidence, and identify areas of evidence concentration and gaps.

Search Methods

We comprehensively searched for eligible English-language empirical studies published across 23 academic databases and 11 gray literature sources through August 2020. Additions to the pool of potentially eligible studies from supplemental sources were made through November 2020.

Selection Criteria

The conceptual framework for this EGM draws upon a legal epidemiological perspective highlighting the causal effects of law and policy on population-level outcomes. Eligible interventions include policies that create or expand access to a legal or decriminalized supply of cannabis: comprehensive medical cannabis laws (MCLs), limited medical cannabidiol laws (CBDLs), recreational cannabis laws (RCLs), industrial hemp laws (IHLs), and decriminalization of cultivations laws (DCLs). Eligible outcomes include intermediate responses (i.e., attitudes/behaviors and markets/environments) and longer-term consequences (health, safety, and socioeconomic outcomes) of these laws.

Data Collection and Analysis

Both dual screening and dual data extraction were performed with third person deconfliction. Primary studies were appraised using the Maryland Scientific Methods Scale and systematic reviews were assessed using AMSTAR 2.

Main Results

The EGM includes 447 studies, comprising 438 primary studies and nine systematic reviews. Most research derives from the United States, with little research from other countries. By far, most cannabis liberalization research focuses on the effects of MCLs and RCLs. Studies targeting other laws-including CBDLs, IHLs, and DCLs-are relatively rare. Of the 113 distinct outcomes we documented, cannabis use was the single most frequently investigated. More than half these outcomes were addressed by three or fewer studies, highlighting substantial evidence gaps in the literature. The systematic evidence base is relatively small, comprising just seven completed reviews on cannabis use (3), opioid-related harms (3), and alcohol-related outcomes (1). Moreover, we have limited confidence in the reviews, as five were appraised as minimal quality and two as low quality.

Authors’ Conclusions

More primary and systematic research is needed to better understand the effects of cannabis liberalization laws on longer-term-and arguably more salient-health, safety, and socioeconomic outcomes. Since most research concerns MCLs and RCLs, there is a critical need for research on the societal impacts of industrial hemp production, medical CBD products, and decriminalized cannabis cultivation. Future research should also prioritize understanding the heterogeneous effects of these laws given differences in specific provisions and implementation across jurisdictions.

The Impact of Isolated Preoperative Cannabis Use on Outcomes Following Cervical Spinal Fusion: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Background

Cannabis is the most commonly used recreational drug in the USA. Studies evaluating cannabis use and its impact on outcomes following cervical spinal fusion (CF) are limited. This study sought to assess the impact of isolated (exclusive) cannabis use on postoperative outcomes following CF by analyzing outcomes like complications, readmissions, and revisions.

Methods

The New York Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) was queried for patients who underwent CF between January 2009 and September 2013. Inclusion criteria were age ≥18 years and either a minimum 90-day (for complications and readmissions) or 2-year (for revisions) follow-up surveillance. Patients with systemic disease, osteomyelitis, cancer, trauma, and concomitant substance or polysubstance abuse/dependence were excluded. Patients with a preoperative International Classification of Diseases, 9th Edition, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis of isolated cannabis abuse (Cannabis) or dependence were identified. The primary outcome measures were 90-day complications, 90-day readmissions, and two-year revisions following CF. Cannabis patients were 1:1 propensity score-matched by age, gender, race, Deyo score, surgical approach, and tobacco use to non-cannabis users and compared for outcomes. Multivariate binary stepwise logistic regression models identified independent predictors of outcomes.

Results

432 patients (n=216 each) with comparable age, sex, Deyo scores, tobacco use, and distribution of anterior or posterior surgical approaches were identified (all p>0.05). Cannabis patients were predominantly Black (27.8% vs. 12.0%), primarily utilized Medicaid (29.6% vs. 12.5%), and had longer LOS (3.0 vs. 1.9 days), all p≤0.001. Both cohorts experienced comparable rates of 90-day medical and surgical, as well as overall complications (5.6% vs. 3.7%) and two-year revisions (4.2% vs. 2.8%, p=0.430), but isolated cannabis patients had higher 90-day readmission rates (11.6% vs. 6.0%, p=0.042). Isolated cannabis use independently predicted 90-day readmission (Odds Ratio=2.0), but did not predict any 90-day complications or two year revisions (all p>0.05).

Conclusion

Isolated baseline cannabis dependence/abuse was associated with increased risk of 90-day readmission following CF. Further investigation of the physiologic impact of cannabis on musculoskeletal patients may elucidate significant contributory factors. Level of Evidence: III.

Cannabis and Rheumatoid Arthritis: A Scoping Review Evaluating the Benefits, Risks, and Future Research Directions

Rheumatoid diseases, including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, and fibromyalgia, are characterized by progressive inflammation in the musculoskeletal system, predominantly affecting the joints and leading to cartilage and bone damage. The resulting pain and ongoing degradation of the musculoskeletal system contribute to reduced physical activity, ultimately impacting quality of life and imposing a substantial socioeconomic burden. Unfortunately, current therapeutics have limited efficacy in slowing disease progression and managing pain. Thus, the development of novel and alternative therapies is imperative. Cannabinoids possess beneficial properties as potential treatments for rheumatoid diseases due to their anti-inflammatory and analgesic properties. Preclinical studies have demonstrated promising results in halting disease progression and relieving pain. However, there is a scarcity of patient clinical studies, and the available data show mixed results. Consequently, there are currently no established clinical recommendations regarding the utilization of cannabis for treating rheumatoid diseases. In this review, we aim to explore the concept of cannabis use for rheumatoid diseases, including potential adverse effects. We will provide an overview of the data obtained from preclinical and clinical trials and from retrospective studies on the efficacy and safety of cannabis in the treatment of rheumatoid diseases.

Cannabis Use in Patients With Distal Radius Fractures: A Moment of Unity?

BACKGROUND

As legalization of cannabis spreads, an increasing number of patients who use cannabis are being seen in the clinical setting. This study examined the impact of cannabis and tobacco use on postoperative complications following open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of distal radius fractures.

METHODS

A national, all-payer database was queried to identify patients who underwent ORIF of a distal radius fracture between 2015 and 2020 (n = 970 747). Patients were stratified into the following groups: (1) tobacco use (n = 86 941), (2) cannabis use (n = 898), (3) tobacco and cannabis use (n = 9842), and (4) neither tobacco nor cannabis use ("control", 747 892). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for infection, nonunion, and malunion within the first postoperative year.

RESULTS

Concomitant use of tobacco and cannabis was associated with a higher rate of nonunion (5.0%) compared to tobacco or cannabis use alone (P < .001). Multivariate analysis identified cannabis-only use (odds ratio [OR] 1.25), tobacco-only use (OR 2.17), and concurrent tobacco and cannabis use (OR 1.78) as risk factors for infection within the first postoperative year. Similarly, cannabis-only use (OR 1.47), tobacco-only use (OR 1.92), and concurrent tobacco and cannabis use (OR 2.52) were associated with an increased risk of malunion.

CONCLUSIONS

Cannabis use is associated with an elevated risk of infection and malunion following operative management of a distal radius fracture. Concomitant use of cannabis and tobacco poses an elevated risk of nonunion and malunion compared to tobacco use alone.

Adverse Events After Ankle Fracture Open Reduction Internal Fixation Among Patients With and Without Documented Cannabis and Tobacco Use

BACKGROUND

Ankle fractures are common orthopaedic injuries that may be indicated for open reduction internal fixation (ORIF). Although the negative impact of tobacco use on perioperative outcomes of ankle fracture ORIF has been described, the potential impact of cannabis use on related outcomes is not as well established.

METHODS

Retrospective database study of adult patients undergoing ankle ORIF for closed, isolated, ankle fractures from the 2010-2021 Q1 PearlDiver M151 data set. Subcohorts without and with cannabis and/or tobacco use were identified based on coding and matched based on patient age, sex, and Elixhauser Comorbidity Index (ECI) scores to yield groups of nonusers, tobacco users, tobacco and cannabis users, and cannabis users. Ninety-day adverse events were assessed between matched subcohorts with multivariable logistic regression controlling for age, sex, and ECI.

RESULTS

A total of 149 289 patients met study inclusion criteria for whom tobacco only use was documented for 14 989 (10.0%), tobacco and cannabis use for 2726 (1.8%), and cannabis only use for 867 (0.6%). Matching yielded 823 for each group. On multivariable analyses, isolated tobacco users were at higher odds of 90-day urinary tract infections (UTIs) (odds ratio [OR] 2.64), minor adverse events (OR 2.33), all-cause adverse events (OR 2.17), readmissions (OR 1.85), and severe adverse events (OR 1.84). Tobacco and cannabis comorbid users were at a marginally higher odds of 90-day UTI (OR 2.82), minor adverse events (OR 2.51), readmissions (OR 2.39), and any adverse events (OR 2.22). Cannabis only users were not at greater odds of 90-day adverse events relative to nonusers.

CONCLUSION

Patients with tobacco use (alone or with cannabis) were at greater odds of 90-day adverse events following ankle fracture ORIF, but cannabis only users were not.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, Retrospective database study.

Cannabis Use Does Not Affect Outcomes After Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Cannabis use in patients undergoing arthroplasty has increased with ongoing legalization throughout the United States. The purpose of this study was to report total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcomes in patients self-reporting cannabis use.

METHODS

There were 74 patients who underwent primary THA from January 2014 to December 2019 at a single institution with minimum 1-year follow-up who had their self-reported cannabis use retrospectively reviewed. Patients who had a history of alcohol or illicit drug abuse were excluded. A match control was conducted based on age; body mass index; sex; Charlson Comorbidity Index; insurance status; and use of nicotine, narcotics, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines to patients undergoing THA who did not self-report cannabis use. Outcomes included Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Reconstruction (HOOS JR), in hospital morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs) consumed, outpatient MMEs prescribed, in hospital lengths of stay (LOS), postoperative complications, and readmissions.

RESULTS

There was no difference in the preoperative, postoperative, or change in Harris Hip Score or HOOS JR between cohorts. There was also no difference in hospital MMEs consumed (102.4 versus 101, P = .92), outpatient MMEs prescribed (119 versus 156, P = .11) or lengths of stay (1.4 versus 1.5 days, P = .32). Also, readmissions (4 versus 4, P = 1.0) and reoperations (2 versus 1, P = .56) were not different between groups.

CONCLUSION

Self-reported cannabis use does not influence 1-year outcomes after THA. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of perioperative cannabis use after THA to help guide orthopaedic surgeons in counseling patients.

Disparities in cannabis use and documentation in electronic health records among children and young adults

The legalizations of medical and recreational cannabis have generated a great deal of interest in studying the health impacts of cannabis products. Despite increases in cannabis use, its documentation during clinical visits is not yet mainstream. This lack of information hampers efforts to study cannabis's effects on health outcomes. A clear and in-depth understanding of current trends in cannabis use documentation is necessary to develop proper guidelines to screen and document cannabis use. Here we have developed and used a natural language processing pipeline to evaluate the trends and disparities in cannabis documentation. The pipeline includes a screening step to identify clinical notes with cannabis use documentation which is then fed into a BERT-based classifier to confirm positive use. This pipeline is applied to more than 23 million notes from a large cohort of 370,087 patients seen in a high-volume multi-site pediatric and young adult clinic over a period of 21 years. Our findings show a very low but growing rate of cannabis use documentation (<2%) in electronic health records with significant demographic and socioeconomic disparities in both documentation and positive use, which requires further attention.

Cannabis Use Does Not Increase Risk of Perioperative Complications Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cohort-Matched Comparison

Introduction: Cannabis use among arthroplasty patients has dramatically increased throughout the United States. Despite this trend, knowledge remains particularly limited regarding the effects of cannabis use on perioperative outcomes in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Therefore, the goal of this research was to investigate how cannabis use affects risk of perioperative outcomes, cost and length of stay (LOS) after THA. Materials and Methods: The National Inpatient Sample was used to identify 331,825 patients who underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2014 using the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9) procedure code 81.51. Patients with an ICD-9 diagnosis code correlating to history of thromboembolic events, cardiac events, or active substance use other than cannabis were eliminated. The ICD-9 diagnosis codes for cannabis use (304.3-304.32, 305.2-305.22) were used to identify 538 patients with active use. Cannabis users were matched 1:1 to nonusers on age, sex, tobacco use, and comorbidities. The chi-square test was used to determine risk of major and minor complications, whereas the Kruskal-Wallis H test was used to compare hospital charges and LOS. Results: A total of 534 (99.3%) patients with cannabis use were successfully matched with 534 patients without cannabis use. Risk of major complications among cannabis users (25, 4.68%) was similar to that of nonusers (20, 3.74%, p=0.446). Minor complications also occurred at similar rates between cannabis users (77, 14.4%) and nonusers (87, 16.3%, p=0.396). LOS for cannabis users (3.07±2.40) did not differ from nonusers (3.10±1.45, p=0.488). Mean hospital charges were higher for cannabis users ($17,847±10,024) compared with nonusers ($16,284±7025, p<0.001). Conclusion: Utilizing statistically matched cohorts within a nationally representative database demonstrated that cannabis use is not associated with increased risk of complications or prolonged LOS after primary THA. However, cannabis use is associated with higher hospital charges.

Association between chronic disease and substance use among older adults in Tennessee

Background

Substance use and misuse have a negative impact on health care outcomes, specifically in the older adult population. Older adults are at risk due to several factors occurring toward the end of life such as changing family dynamics, loss of friends and loved ones, and chronic diseases. Substance use in older adults with chronic diseases in rural areas remains poorly studied. This study examines older adults greater than 55 of age in the state of Tennessee, U.S.A.

Design and methods

Data was extracted from the 2019 National Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) with a subsample for the State of Tennessee (N = 6242) and individuals over age 55 (N = 3389).

Results

At least 33.7% (N = 1143) of older adults have a chronic disease, and 24.4% (N = 828) have at least two or more chronic diseases. Alcohol use in the past month was reported in 29.4% of older adults; however, chronic disease status was not associated with alcohol use. Marijuana use and smoking in the past month were significant for older adults with two or more chronic diseases. Low income and less high school education were associated with chronic disease and smoking.

Conclusions

Marijuana use and smoking were found to be significant in older adults with chronic disease, but not with alcohol use. Preventative measures such as screening tools, education, and providing resources to patients should be targeted to populations at risk to promote overall health outcomes.

ASRA Pain Medicine consensus guidelines on the management of the perioperative patient on cannabis and cannabinoids

BACKGROUND

The past two decades have seen an increase in cannabis use due to both regulatory changes and an interest in potential therapeutic effects of the substance, yet many aspects of the substance and their health implications remain controversial or unclear.

METHODS

In November 2020, the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine charged the Cannabis Working Group to develop guidelines for the perioperative use of cannabis. The Perioperative Use of Cannabis and Cannabinoids Guidelines Committee was charged with drafting responses to the nine key questions using a modified Delphi method with the overall goal of producing a document focused on the safe management of surgical patients using cannabinoids. A consensus recommendation required ≥75% agreement.

RESULTS

Nine questions were selected, with 100% consensus achieved on third-round voting. Topics addressed included perioperative screening, postponement of elective surgery, concomitant use of opioid and cannabis perioperatively, implications for parturients, adjustment in anesthetic and analgesics intraoperatively, postoperative monitoring, cannabis use disorder, and postoperative concerns. Surgical patients using cannabinoids are at potential increased risk for negative perioperative outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Specific clinical recommendations for perioperative management of cannabis and cannabinoids were successfully created.

Cannabis use disorder is associated with shorter length of stay and increased home discharge after primary total joint arthroplasty: a propensity-weighted analysis

INTRODUCTION

Increased legalization of cannabis use across the United States has been correlated with increased cannabis use in the clinical setting. However, little is known regarding the characteristics and postoperative outcomes after primary joint arthroplasty (TJA) for patients with cannabis use disorder (CUD).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used data from the National Inpatient Sample of patients undergoing primary TJA between 2006 to 2015. Patients were grouped based on presence of concomitant CUD. Patient demographic characteristics and outcome data between groups were analyzed. Propensity score methodology was used to compare immediate in-hospital complications and economic outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 8,740,798 TJAs were included. The prevalence of CUD increased nearly five-fold from 0.05% to 0.26% during this time (P < 0.0001). CUD patients were significantly younger, more likely to be male, most frequently of non-Hispanic Black race, and had higher rates of Medicaid insurance. Patients with CUD had a significantly shorter length of hospital stay (3.04 vs. 3.24 days, P = 0.0297), while incurring significantly higher daily ($22,614 vs. $17,955, P < 0.0001) and total charges during admission ($58,507 vs. $50,924, P < 0.0001), compared to patients without CUD. When compared with the control group, CUD was associated with significantly greater odds of home discharge (odds ratio (OR): 1.45, P = 0.0007), and significantly lower odds of rehab discharge (OR: 0.70, P = 0.0013). There were no differences in overall complication profile or in the vast majority of individual in-hospital complications between groups.

CONCLUSION

While CUD is correlated to shorter length of stay and increased home discharge after TJA, it does not show a strong effect on complications in an inpatient postoperative setting. It is important for clinicians to appreciate the demographic profile and expected clinical and economic outcomes for patients with CUD undergoing TJA, particularly in the context of evolving laws surrounding cannabis use.

Preoperative Substance Use Disorder Is Associated With an Increase in 90-Day Postoperative Complications, 1-Year Revisions and Conversion to Arthroplasty Following Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Substance Use Disorder on the Rise

PURPOSE

The purpose of the current study was to use a nationwide administrative-claims database to characterize the substance use disorder trends of patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (RCR). Additionally, we sought to evaluate the influence of preoperative substance use disorder on postoperative outcomes following arthroscopic RCR.

METHODS

The Mariner database was used to identify patients undergoing RCR using CPT codes, ages 18-84 years old, from 2010 to 2019. Patients were stratified by substance use, including cannabis, cocaine, nicotine, alcohol, opioids, stimulants, or sedative, as defined by International Classification of Diseases (ICD) codes. Substance use disorders trends were reported. Postoperative outcomes assessed consisted of major complications, minor complications, infections, readmissions, and Emergency Department visits within 90 days of surgery. Additionally, postoperative stiffness, revision surgery, and conversion to arthroplasty within 1 year were evaluated. Multivariate logistic regressions were used to control for demographic and comorbid factors.

RESULTS

Substance use trends from 2010 to 2019 show an increase in documentation of substance use in patients undergoing RCR. Individuals with a history of substance use disorder had an increased risk of adverse outcomes, most notably major medical complications (odds ratio [OR]: 1.63; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.44-1.86; P < .001), revision surgery (OR: 1.43; 95% CI: 1.30-1.56; P < .001), and conversion to arthroplasty (OR: 1.40; 95% CI: 1.08-1.80; P = .009). Subgroup analysis demonstrated that cannabis users were at higher risk for major medical complications (OR: 1.75; 95% CI: 1.15-2.56; P < .001), conversion to arthroplasty (OR: 3.54; 95% CI: 1.77-6.4; P < .001), and revision (OR: 1.53; 95% CI: 1.12-2.04; P < .05) compared to controls. Additionally, substance use was associated with higher medical costs in terms of procedural cost (β; $3634: $3,490-3,777) and 90-day postoperative costs (β: $436; $375-$498).

CONCLUSION

Documentation of substance use disorder is increasing in individuals undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair. Substance use is associated with higher rates of postoperative complications, overall costs, and revision surgery following arthroscopic RCR. Nicotine and cannabis use were most commonly associated with increased rates of postoperative complications and treatment failure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, retrospective therapeutic case series.

Validity between self-report and biochemical testing of cannabis and drugs among patients with traumatic injury: brief report

Background

The relationship between drug use and traumatic injury is well documented, yet only a small proportion of patients are biochemically tested for cannabis and other substances. The study objective was to determine whether patient self-report can be used as a proxy for biochemical drug testing following traumatic injury.

Methods

This study was a secondary analysis that included 320 patients admitted to four level I trauma centers in Colorado and Texas, primarily involved in motor vehicle crash (89%). If performed, biochemical testing was collected via urine toxicology screen (“tox screen”) for cannabis, amphetamines, barbiturates, cocaine, opiates, PCP, and benzodiazepines. All patients were screened for self-reported current drug use, which was evaluated for any drug and specifically for cannabis use. Analyses used to compare results of self-reported drug use and tox screen included sensitivity, specificity, positive, and negative predictive values, and percent agreement.

Results

Among 320 patients, 23% (n = 75) self-reported drug use; cannabis was the most frequently reported drug (n = 63). A tox screen was performed in 59% of patients (n = 190); the proportion of patients who had a tox screen was similar for those self-reporting drug use (60.0%) to those who denied using drugs (59.2%), p = 0.90. Among patients who had a tox screen performed, 18% (n = 35) tested positive for any drug, 12% (n = 22) tested positive for THC, and 7% (n = 13) tested positive for opiates. The percent agreement was 80% for any drug and 81% for cannabis. The specificity was 84–85%, indicating a high likelihood that a patient will not have a positive tox screen if they do not report using drugs. Negative predictive values were 90–95%, indicating a negative self-report correctly identified nearly all patients testing negative on tox screen. Sensitivity was only 60% and positive predictive values were 30–47% for cannabis and drugs, respectively.

Conclusion

These findings may negate the need for biochemical drug testing in this population, particularly as a “rule out” based on self-reporting. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings and should address risk of selection bias.

Cannabis Use Among Lower-Extremity Arthroplasty Patients Does Not Lead to Worse Postoperative Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Smoking and general categorizations of substance use are linked with increased postoperative complications following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and total hip arthroplasty (THA). There is a lack of similar evidence on how cannabis use may affect outcomes after arthroplasty. The present study aims to compare postoperative outcomes in cannabis users versus non-cannabis users who underwent THA/TKA. We hypothesize that cannabis users will have no difference in primarily the complication rate, revision rate, and secondarily post-operative Patient-Reported Outcomes Information System (PROMIS) scores, hospital stay, or pain compared to matched controls.

METHODS

Billing codes were used to generate lists of hip/knee arthroplasty patients from 2013 to 2019 at our institution. In the case group, cannabis use was confirmed via chart review. Cannabis-using patients were matched appropriately with non-users by (1) the same arthroplasty procedure; (2) BMI ± 3.5; (3) age ± 3 years; (4) sex. Data on postoperative outcomes were collected from charts and compared between groups using either a Chi-square test for qualitative variables or a paired t-test for quantitative variables.

RESULTS

A total of 24 patients with an average age of 57.1 and a BMI of 30.6 were confirmed to have isolated cannabis use. They were matched to 24 patients with an average age of 57.6 and a BMI of 31.4. There were no significant differences in the complication rate (4.2% vs 4.2%, p=1.00), the revision rate (0% vs 4.2%, p=0.31), days of hospital stay (2.7 vs 3.3, p=0.22), or postoperative pain (4.7 vs 4.9, p=0.86). Similarly, there were no significant differences in all PROMIS score measures.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSIONS

Current research shows that cannabis use may lead to increased revision arthroplasty and decreased mortality, with mixed findings regarding post-surgical complications. The present study suggests that cannabis-using patients have no difference in postoperative complication rate, revision rate, PROMIS scores, hospital stay, or pain compared to matched controls.

Self-Reported Cannabis Use Is Associated With a Lower Rate of Persistent Opioid Use After Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

Legalization of cannabis, along with concern over prescription opiate use, has garnered interest in cannabis for adjuvant pain control. This study examines the relationship between cannabis and opioid consumption after total hip (THA) or knee (TKA) arthroplasty.

Methods

Patients undergoing primary THA or TKA with minimum 6-month follow-up who self-reported cannabis use were retrospectively reviewed. A total of 210 patients (128 TKAs and 82 THAs) were matched by age; gender; type of arthroplasty; Charlson Comorbidity Index; and use of nicotine, antidepressants, or benzodiazepines to patients who did not self-report cannabis use. Patients receiving an opioid prescription after 90 days postoperatively were classified as persistent opioid users (POUs). Duration of opioid use (DOU) was calculated for non-POU patients as the time between surgery and their last opioid prescription. Differences in inpatient morphine milligram equivalents (MMEs), outpatient MMEs, POU, and DOU were analyzed.

Results

Cannabis users required equivalent inpatient and outpatient MMEs. There was no difference in DOU. There was a significant difference in POU between cannabis users and matched controls (1.4% [n = 3] vs 9.5% [n = 20], P < .001, respectively). Grouping patients by TKA or THA, there remained a difference in POU for TKA (1.5% [n = 2] vs 10.9% [n = 14], P = .002) and THA (1.2% [n = 1] vs 7.3% [n = 6], P = .04). There was no difference in inpatient or outpatient MMEs or DOU for THA and TKA patients.

Conclusions

There is a reduced rate of POU in patients who self-report perioperative cannabis use. Prospective studies are needed to clarify the role of cannabis as an adjunct to perioperative pain control.

Preoperative cannabis use does not increase opioid utilization following primary total hip arthroplasty in a propensity matched analysis

PURPOSE

The recreational and medical use of cannabis is being legalized worldwide. Its use has been linked to an increased risk of developing opioid use disorders. As opioids continue to be prescribed after total hip arthroplasty (THA), the influence that preoperative cannabis use may have on postoperative opioid consumption remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to assess the relationship between preoperative cannabis use and opioid utilization following primary THA.

METHODS

We identified all patients over the age of 18 who underwent unilateral, primary THA for a diagnosis of osteoarthritis at a single institution from February 2019 to April 2021. Our cohort was grouped into current cannabis users (within 6 months of surgery) and those who reported never using cannabis. One hundred and fifty-six current users were propensity score matched 1:6 with 936 never users based on age, sex, BMI, history of chronic pain, smoking status, history of anxiety/depression, ASA classification and type of anesthesia. Outcomes included inpatient and postdischarge opioid use in morphine milligram equivalents.

RESULTS

Total inpatient opioid utilization, opioids refilled, and total opioids used within 90 postoperative days were similar between the groups.

CONCLUSION

In propensity score matched analyses, preoperative cannabis use was not independently associated with an increase in inpatient or outpatient, 90-days opioid consumption following elective THA.

Use of Cannabis Does Not Decrease Opioid Consumption in Patients Who Underwent Total Joint Arthroplasty

Background

The primary purpose of this study was to determine if cannabis use decreases narcotic consumption in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

Material and methods

Forty-six patients undergoing a primary unilateral TJA, who self-reported the use of cannabis, were prospectively enrolled and completed this study between July 2015 and November 2019. This cohort was prospectively matched to patients who did not report cannabis use. Morphine equivalents (MEs) were averaged and recorded at 1 and 2 weeks postoperatively. Secondary outcomes and complications were recorded and reported.

Results

There were no differences noted in ME during the hospitalization between the user (78.7 ± 58.5) and nonusers (70.4 ± 46.3), P = .455. ME daily average did not differ between the cohorts (user [36.8 ± 30.7] and nonuser [31.7 ± 25.6] at 1 week (P = .389) or user [22.5 ± 26.3] and nonusers [15.9 ± 18.3] at 2 weeks, P = .164, postoperatively). The total ME at 2 weeks did not differ between the user and nonuser groups (415 ± 375 vs 333 ± 275, P = .235). Pain scores at 1 week were significantly higher in patients who used cannabis (4.1 ± 1.9 vs 3.4 ± 1.6, P = .05). No differences in pain were noted during the patient's hospitalization or at 2- (P = .071) or 6-week (P = .111) follow-up. No differences in secondary outcomes or complications were noted.

Conclusion

We were unable to show a decrease in narcotic consumption in patients who use cannabis undergoing primary unilateral joint replacement. These findings do not support the routine use of cannabis to decrease or supplement narcotic use after primary TJA.

Level of evidence

Level II therapeutic.

Cannabis for Rheumatic Disease Pain: a Review of Current Literature

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Changing attitudes about marijuana have led to an increase in use of medicinal marijuana, especially for painful chronic conditions. Patients ask rheumatologists for guidance on this topic. This review provides up-to-date information on the safety and efficacy of medicinal cannabis for rheumatic disease pain.

RECENT FINDINGS

The number of publications related to rheumatic disease and cannabis has increased, but recent literature skews heavily toward reviews vs primary research. Data supporting a role for cannabinoids in rheumatic disease continue to grow. Observational and survey studies show increased use of medicinal cannabis, both by people with rheumatic disease and the general population, and suggest that patients find these treatments beneficial. Prospective studies, however, including randomized controlled clinical trials, are rare and sorely needed. As medicinal cannabis use for rheumatic diseases rises, despite lack of evidence, we review the sparse data available and provide tips for conversations about medicinal cannabis for rheumatologists.

Cannabis Use Disorder in the Setting of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty: Understanding the Epidemiology, Demographic Characteristics, and Inpatient Postoperative Outcomes

INTRODUCTION

Cannabis use is expected to increase in the context of its decriminalization and legalization in several states. The purpose of this study was to report on the epidemiologic and demographic characteristics and inpatient postoperative outcomes of patients with cannabis use disorder (CUD) undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

The National Inpatient Sample registry was used to identify patients undergoing THA between 2006 and 2015. Patients were stratified into groups with and without CUD. Epidemiology, comorbidity, and outcomes data were comparatively analyzed between these two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 2,838,742 THAs were performed during the study period. The prevalence of CUD significantly increased from 0.10% in 2006 to 0.39% in 2015 (P < 0.0001). Patients with CUD were significantly younger, more likely to be male, had higher rates of Medicaid insurance and were more likely to be non-Hispanic Black and less likely to be non-Hispanic White when compared with the control group. When comparing patients with and without CUD, there was no significant difference in the composite any complication variable and no significant difference in seven of eight individual in-hospital complications assessed, with the exception being higher genitourinary complications in the CUD group. There were no significant differences in discharge disposition or length of stay.

DISCUSSION

Although CUD is significantly associated with various demographic, comorbidity, and hospital characteristics, it is not significantly associated with in-hospital complications, discharge disposition, and length of stay outcomes in the immediate in-hospital, postoperative period. It is critical for clinicians and public health professionals to understand the characteristics and expected inpatient outcomes of this evolving population of patients with CUD undergoing THA, particularly in the context of widespread legalization.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Prevalence of Cannabidiol Use in Patients With Spine Complaints: Results of an Anonymous Survey

BACKGROUND

Cannabidiol (CBD) is a cannabis derivative that has been popularized as a medicinal product with analgesic and anti-inflammatory effects. Given the anecdotal observations that several patients have reported use of CBD for spine-related pain, this study was designed to characterize CBD consumption patterns and perceived effects in patients with spine-related complaints.

METHODS

The study design was a cross-sectional survey. Over a 4-week period, an anonymous paper survey was administered to all patients presenting for evaluation by 1 of 9 spine surgeons at a single institution. Surveys were given upon registration for the office visit and collected by the office manager or nurse before evaluation by the surgeon. Patients were included regardless of surgical status (ie, preoperative, postoperative, or nonoperative) or region of pathology (lumbar, thoracic, or cervical). The survey consisted of multiple-choice questions on patient patterns of CBD use.

RESULTS

Out of 300 surveys, 214 (71%) were completed. CBD use for spine-related pain was reported by 54 (25.2%) patients. CBD was initially used for potential relief of back pain (66.7%), neck pain (37.0%), leg pain (35.2%), and/or arm pain (9.3%). Users also sought improvements in insomnia (25.9%) and mood (18.5%). Oil was the most popular formulation (64.8%). CBD was most often consumed 2-5 times (40.7%) or 6-10 times (31.5%) per week. The most common source of initial recommendation for CBD was friends or family (75.9%). Reported benefits were pain relief (46.3%), improved sleep (33.3%), and reduced anxiety (20.4%); however, 24.1% of patients reported no benefit from CBD use. The most reported side effect was fatigue (7.4%). Most users (63.0%) would recommend CBD to a friend for pain relief.

CONCLUSION

CBD is already used by many patients, and further high-quality research on this supplement is essential.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

4.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

CBD is a commonly used by spine patients as an off label treatment.

Impact of recreational cannabis legalization on patient self-reporting of cannabis use at a pharmacist-led primary care clinic

BACKGROUND

The Cannabis Act, introduced in Canada in 2018, legalized the use of recreational cannabis. The impact of the announcement and implementation of this act on patient self-reporting of cannabis use has not been explored.

OBJECTIVE

The study objective was to determine if patient self-reported cannabis use increased after the announcement and implementation of legislative changes to legalize recreational cannabis.

METHODS

A repeated cross-sectional design was used for a retrospective chart review of patients seen at a pharmacist-led primary care clinic. A convenience sample of patient records was divided into 3 panels, corresponding with the preannouncement (November 1, 2013-October 4, 2015), postannouncement (October 5, 2015-October 16, 2018), and postimplementation (October 17, 2018-October 17, 2019) stages of the legalization of recreational cannabis. Search terms used included cannabis, marijuana, marihuana, recreational drugs, natur∗, medicinal, pot, joint, oil, butter, brownies, edibles, cannabin∗, THC, tetrahydro∗, sativa, and indica (∗ = string wild card). The frequency of reporting use and the number of queries related to cannabis were assessed. The analysis of variance test and Pearson correlation (chi-square) were used to compare the 3 panels.

RESULTS

A total of 298 patient charts were included in the analysis. One hundred, 99, and 99 patient charts corresponded with panels 1, 2, and 3, respectively. At each time point, 6%, 8%, and 14% of the patients reported cannabis use (P = 0.03). A statistically significant increase in topical oil use and a decrease in prescription tablet or capsule use between panels 1 and 3 (P = 0.036) were identified.

CONCLUSION

This study found an increase in self-reporting of cannabis use across the 3 consecutive panels. The change in the product formulations used may reflect the various products available. Frontline pharmacists are encouraged to initiate conversations regarding cannabis use as part of routine practice.

Patient Perception Regarding Potential Effectiveness of Cannabis for Pain Management

BACKGROUND

Self-reported cannabis use has increased since its recent legalization in many states. The primary objective of this study is to describe patients' beliefs regarding the potential effectiveness of cannabis and gauge patient acceptance of these compounds if prescribed by a physician.

METHODS

Five hundred fifty-five consecutive new patients in a total joint arthroplasty (TJA) practice completed a questionnaire at their new patient or preoperative encounter. Questions regarding their beliefs about the potential effectiveness of cannabis for pain management were presented to the patient. Each question was scored in accordance to the agreement of the patient. Data were also collected on patient demographics, and current cannabis, tobacco, and/or alcohol use.

RESULTS

Current cannabis use was reported in 20.2% (112/555) of respondents. Patients were interested in using cannabis if prescribed by a physician for acute (75.3%, 418/515) and chronic (74.4%, 415/555) pain. Seventy-seven percent (428/555) of patients believe (strongly agree or agree) that cannabis should be legalized for medical use, whereas only 39% (217/555) strongly agree or agree that cannabis should be legalized for recreational use. Patients strongly agree or agree that cannabis can help with sleep or anxiety, 44.9% (249/555) and 49.4% (274/555) respectively. Most patients had never smoked (53%, 294/555) and drink one or less alcoholic beverage per week (52.1%, 299/555).

CONCLUSION

Patients believe that cannabis may be helpful for pain management after TJA and are willing to use if prescribed by their orthopedic provider. Further research is warranted to determine if cannabis is a helpful adjunct to pain management in this patient population.

Use of Tetrahydrocannabinol and Cannabidiol Products in the Perioperative Period Around Primary Unilateral Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Given the opioid crisis in America, patients are trying alternative medications including tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and other cannabidiol (CBD) containing products in the perioperative period, especially in states where these products are legal. This study sought to analyze usage rates of CBD/THC products in the perioperative period for primary unilateral total hip and knee arthroplasty (THA/TKA) patients and identify a possible association with post-operative opioid use.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of primary unilateral THA/TKA patients were enrolled at a single institution. Patients who completed detailed pain journals were retrospectively surveyed for CBD/THC product usage. Pain medications were converted to morphine milligram equivalents (MME).

RESULTS

Data from 195 of the 210 patients (92.9% response rate) following primary arthroplasty were analyzed. Overall, 16.4% of arthroplasty-22.6% (n = 19) of TKA and 11.7% (n = 13) of THA-patients used CBD/THC products in the perioperative period. There was a wide variety of usage patterns among those using CBD/THC products. In comparing CBD/THC users and non-users, there was no significant difference in the length of narcotic use, total morphine milligram equivalents taken, narcotic pills taken, average post-op pain scores, the percentage of patients requiring a refill of narcotics, or length of stay.

CONCLUSION

Understanding that CBD/THC usage was not consistent for patients who used these products, 22.6% of TKA and 11.7% of THA patients tried CBD/THC products in the perioperative period. In this small sample, CBD/THC use was not associated with a major effect on narcotic requirements. Further studies on the effects of CBD/THC are needed as these therapies become more widely available.

Medicinal Cannabis in Orthopaedic Practice

Cannabis has gained widespread public advocacy since its legalization in several states with recent evidence suggesting that its self-reported use has increased in patients undergoing a primary total joint arthroplasty. The endocannabinoid system has been proposed to play a role in decreasing the inflammatory cascade and enhancing pain management. For these reasons, interest has emerged in the orthopaedic community as a potential treatment or adjunct to treatment in many musculoskeletal conditions. However, the evidence to date is scant and precludes recommendations for its widespread use. Given the current paucity of evidence in the orthopaedic cohort, future research is warranted in this area to determine the efficacy and safety before endorsements can be made by orthopaedic surgeons.

Patients Who Have Cannabis Use Disorder Have Higher Rates of Venous Thromboemboli, Readmission Rates, and Costs Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that cannabis can interfere with hematological parameters and platelet morphology. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether patients with cannabis use disorder undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have higher rates of (1) venous thromboemboli (VTEs); (2) readmissions; and (3) costs.

METHODS

Study group patients undergoing primary TKA were identified from a large, nationwide database. Patients who had a history of VTEs, deep vein thromboses (DVTs), pulmonary emboli (PEs), and coagulopathies before their TKA were excluded. Study group patients were matched to controls in a 1:4 ratio by age, sex, a comorbidity index, and medical comorbidities. The query yielded 18,388 patients (cannabis = 3680; controls = 14,708). Outcomes analyzed included rates of 90-day VTEs, DVTs, and PEs, in addition to 90-day readmissions and costs. A P value less than .01 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Patients who have cannabis use disorder were found to have significantly higher incidence and odds (2.79% vs 1.78%; odds ratio [OR], 1.58; P < .0001) of VTEs, DVTs (2.41% vs 1.44%; OR, 1.68; P < .0001), and PEs (0.97% vs 0.62%; P = .01). Readmissions were significantly higher (27.03% vs 23.18%; OR, 1.22; P < .0001) in patients who have cannabis use disorder. Patients with cannabis use disorder have significantly higher day of surgery ($14,024.88 vs $12,127.49; P < .0001) and 90-day costs ($19,155.45 vs $16,315.00; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

This study found that patients who have a cannabis use disorder have higher rates of thromboembolic complications, readmission rates, and costs following primary TKA compared to a matched cohort.

Cannabidiol: A Brief Review of Its Therapeutic and Pharmacologic Efficacy in the Management of Joint Disease

Cannabis use in the management of musculoskeletal diseases has gained advocacy since several states have legalized its recreational use. Cannabidiol (CBD), a commercially available, non-neurotropic marijuana constituent, has shown promise in arthritic animal models by attenuating pro-inflammatory immune responses. Additional research has demonstrated the benefit of CBD in decreasing the endogenous pain response in mice subjected to acute arthritic conditions, and further studies have highlighted improved fracture healing following CBD use in murine mid-femoral fractures. However, there is a lack of high-quality, novel research investigating the use of CBD in human musculoskeletal diseases aside from anecdotal accounts and retrospective reviews, perhaps due to legal ramifications limiting the enrollment of patients. The purpose of this review article is to highlight the extent of current research on CBD and its biochemical and pharmacologic efficacy in the treatment of joint disease, as well as the evidence for use of CBD and cannabis in patients undergoing joint arthroplasty. Based on available literature relying on retrospective data and case reports, it is challenging to propose a recommendation for CBD use in perioperative pain management. Additionally, a number of CBD products currently available as supplements with different methods of administration, and it is important to remember that these products are non-pharmaceuticals. However, given the increased social relevance of CBD and cannabis-based medicines, future, prospective controlled studies evaluating their efficacy are needed.

Characteristics of Marijuana Use Among Orthopedic Patients

Marijuana use among orthopedic patients has not been extensively studied. The purpose of this study was to investigate the prevalence of marijuana use among orthopedic surgery patients. Additionally, the authors sought to better characterize how and why their patients use marijuana. Patients presenting at 3 institutions in 2 states for orthopedic surgery were asked to complete a voluntary survey. In addition to basic demographic information, the survey contained questions regarding the frequency of, methods of, and reasons for marijuana use. Patients who had used marijuana in the past year were categorized as marijuana users. A total of 275 patients completed surveys, of whom 94 (34%) endorsed marijuana use in the past year. A majority of marijuana users (55%) endorsed using marijuana either daily or weekly. Smoking was the most common means of marijuana use (90%), followed by edible products (35%) and vaporizing (24%). Pain management (54%) and recreation (52%) were the most commonly cited reasons for using marijuana. Eighty-six percent of marijuana users indicated that they would stop using marijuana if told by their physician that marijuana use would adversely affect their surgery. Marijuana use is common among orthopedic patients. Many patients believe marijuana is beneficial for managing pain and other medical conditions, although most would be willing to stop using marijuana if told it would negatively impact their surgery. Further study into the effects of marijuana use on musculoskeletal health is warranted because marijuana use may be a risk factor easily modified to improve surgical outcomes. [Orthopedics. 2020; 43(2): 108-112.].

Cannabis Use Does Not Affect Outcomes After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The self-reported use of cannabis has increased since its recent legalization in several states. The primary purpose of this study is to report total knee arthroplasty (TKA) outcomes in patients using cannabis.

METHODS

Seventy-one patients who underwent a primary unilateral TKA with minimum 1-year follow-up, who self-reported cannabis use, were retrospectively reviewed. The study period was from January 2014 to February 2018 at a single institution. Patients with a history of opioid consumption, alcohol abuse, tobacco, or illicit drug use were excluded. A matched control was conducted based on age, body mass index, gender, smoking status, and insurance type (surrogate of socioeconomic status) in patients with a unilateral TKA who did not report cannabis use. Outcome measures included Knee Society Scores (KSS), range of motion, Veterans RAND-12 mental and physical component scores. No preoperative differences were noted with these measures. Postoperative complications were recorded and reported.

RESULTS

No difference in length of stay was noted between the users (46.9 hours ± 15.7) and nonusers (49.3 hours ± 20.4) (P = .464). In-hospital total morphine equivalents did not differ between the 2 groups (user = 137 ± 104 mg, nonuser = 146 ± 117 mg, P = .634). Postoperative range of motion did not differ between users (128.4° ± 10.4°) and nonusers (126.9° ± 7.5°) (P = .346). No mean differences in follow-up KSS (user = 180.1 ± 24.9, nonuser = 172.0 ± 33.9, P = .106) or total change (user = 61.7 ± 32.8, nonuser = 62.7 ± 30.7, P = .852) in KSS were noted. Likewise, no significant mean differences in Veterans RAND-12 (mental component scores: user = 54.8 ± 9.3, nonuser = 55.9 ± 8.79, P = .472; physical component scores: user = 48.3 ± 9.9, nonuser = 45.8 ± 10.1, P = .145) scores were demonstrated. There were no differences in readmissions (user = 5, nonuser = 4, P = .730) or reoperations (user = 5, nonuser = 2, P = .238).

CONCLUSION

Cannabis use does not appear to influence (adverse or beneficial) short-term outcomes in patients undergoing a primary TKA. Further studies are warranted to determine the efficacy and safety of cannabis as a constituent of multimodal pain management following TKA before endorsements can be made by orthopedic surgeons.