Can Dynamic Ultrasonography of the Hip Reliably Assess Anterior Femoral Head Translation?

Protocol and validity testing of femoroacetabular posterior translation with dynamic hip ultrasonography

OBJECTIVE

To describe femoroacetabular posterior translation (FAPT) using dynamic hip ultrasonography (DHUS), and to determine the inter- and intra-rater reliability of hip ultrasound measurements of FAPT.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study design was a feasibility study of 13 healthy young adults (26 hips) using test-retest analysis. The data was collected prospectively over a 2-week time period. Three DHUS measurements (posterior neutral (PN), flexion, adduction, and internal rotation (PFADIR), and stand and load (PStand) were measured by four independent raters (2 senior who divided the cohort, 1 intermediate, 1 junior) at two time points for bilateral hips of each participant. Reliability was assessed by calculating the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) along with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for each rater and across all raters.

RESULTS

A total of 468 US scans were completed. The mean age of the cohort was 25.7 years (SD 5.1 years) and 54% were female. The inter-rater reliability was excellent for PFADIR (ICC 0.85 95% CI 0.76-0.91), good for PN (ICC 0.69 95% CI 0.5-0.81), and good for PStand (ICC 0.72 95% CI 0.55-0.83). The intra-rater reliability for all raters was good for PFADIR (ICC 0.60 95% CI 0.44-0.73), fair for PN (ICC 0.42 95% CI 0.21-0.59), and fair for PStand (ICC 0.42 95% CI 0.22-0.59).

CONCLUSION

This is the first study to present a protocol using dynamic ultrasonography to measure FAPT. DHUS measure for FAPT was shown to be reliable across raters with varying levels of ultrasound experience.

Relationships among hip instability, iliofemoral ligament, and pain in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the relationships among hip instability, pain, and morphology of the iliofemoral ligament (ILFL) in patients with developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) using ultrasonography (US).

METHODS

We reviewed 86 patients (109 hips) with DDH (Group D), 40 patients (46 hips) with borderline hip dysplasia (BDDH) (Group B) and 20 patients (23 hips) without hip pain and bony abnormality (control group). Group D was classified into three subgroups-the severe (group SP), moderate (group MP), and none/mild (group NMP) hip pain groups-using the visual analogue scale (VAS). For evaluating hip instability and ILFL morphology, the distance between the anterior edge of the anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) and the horizontal line to the femoral head, and ILFL thickness were measured using US. The difference between the distance in the neutral position and Patrick position was calculated and defined as the femoral head translation distance (FTD).

RESULTS

FTD and ILFL thickness in group D were significantly larger than those in the control group and group B (P < 0.05). There was a significant positive correlation between FTD and ILFL thickness in three groups (r = 0.57, P < 0.05; r = 0.55, P < 0.05; r = 0.62, P < 0.05, respectively). FTD and ILFL thickness in group SP were significantly larger than those in group NMP (P < 0.05). FTD and ILFL thickness in group D had significantly negative correlations with the lateral center edge (r = -0.54, P < 0.05; r = -0.40, P < 0.05, respectively) and vertical-center-anterior angle (r = -0.51, P < 0.05; r = -0.43, P < 0.05, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Acetabular bony deficiency, especially in the anterior and lateral region can result in antero-posterior hip instability, leading to thickened ILFL and hip pain, even in patients with BDDH. These findings may facilitate our understanding and treatment of patients with DDH. When hip instability is suspected, hip US examination may help confirm the diagnosis and assist in providing objective clinical diagnostic evidence.

Dysplastic hips demonstrate increased joint translation at higher body mass index

OBJECTIVE

To determine which radiographic measures used to define the severity of hip dysplasia are associated with hip joint translation and to investigate relationships between position, body mass index, and joint translation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a cross-sectional retrospective study evaluating 10 validated radiographic measures of dysplasia on weight-bearing AP pelvis and supine 45-degree bilateral Dunn radiographs of 93 young adults with symptomatic hip dysplasia presenting to a single academic institution between October 2016 and May 2019. We determined the difference between standing and supine measurements for each hip and the correlation of each measure with the patient's body mass index.

RESULTS

Femoral head extrusion index was 2.49% lower on supine X-ray (p = 0.0020). Patients with higher body mass index had higher center gap distance (p = 0.0274), femoral head extrusion (p = 0.0170), and femoral head lateralization (p = 0.0028) when standing. They also had higher Tönnis angle (p_standing = 0.0076, p_supine = 0.0121) and lower lateral center-edge angle (p_standing = 0.0196, p_supine = 0.0410) in both positions. The difference in femoral head lateralization between standing and supine positions increased with higher body mass index (p = 0.0081).

CONCLUSION

Translation of the hip joint with position change is demonstrated by decreased femoral head extrusion index on supine X-ray. Patients with higher body mass index had more dysplastic hips, as measured by five of six radiographic outcomes of dysplasia, and experienced more translation with weight-bearing, reflected by increased femoral head lateralization.

Dynamic ultrasound assessment of hip instability and anterior and posterior hip impingement

OBJECTIVE

In this technical report, we describe our protocol for the dynamic sonographic evaluation of the hip and assess reliability of the ultrasound assessment of hip microinstability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Our clinical experience with a standardized dynamic ultrasound of the hip performed in a series of 27 patients with imaging performed by an experienced musculoskeletal radiologist during physical examination by an orthopedic surgeon specializing in hip preservation is illustrated with clinical photographs and ultrasound images from volunteers and selected patients. Interrater reliability for the diagnosis of microinstability was calculated.

RESULTS

Dynamic ultrasound technique and findings of hip instability, femoroacetabular impingement, and ischiofemoral impingement with corresponding clinical photos showing the necessary physical examination maneuvers are described. Interrater agreement for the diagnosis of microinstability was substantial (κ 0.606 [0.221-0.991]).

CONCLUSION

At our institution, dynamic ultrasound of the hip during physical examination complements information gathered from static imaging by providing real-time correlation of symptoms with what is occurring anatomically.

EURO-MUSCULUS/USPRM Dynamic Ultrasound Protocols for (Adult) Hip

ABSTRACT

In this dynamic scanning protocol, ultrasound assessment of the adult hip is described using different maneuvers for various conditions. Real-time patient examination and ultrasound scanning videos are coupled for convenience as well as for better insight. The text covers the common conditions around the hip where especially dynamic ultrasound scanning provides valuable information in addition to static imaging. The protocol is prepared by an international consensus of several experts in the field of musculoskeletal ultrasound.

Generalized Joint Laxity Is Associated With Dynamic Hip Ultrasonography Measures in Female Athlete Patients Who Are Not Hypermobile

OBJECTIVES

To investigate ultrasound (US) femoroacetabular translation measurements in female athlete patients.

METHODS

A prospective cross-sectional study was conducted in female athlete patients <50 years. Demographic data, Beighton score/hypermobility status, and sport participation were collected. Hip dysplasia was determined using radiographic measurements (lateral center edge angle, anterior center edge angle, Tönnis angle); femoral version angles were measured with CT or MR. Femoroacetabular translation US measures included neutral (N), neutral flexed (NF), extension external rotation/apprehension (EER) positions. Maximal difference (delta) between US measures was calculated.

RESULTS

206/349 female hips were analyzed (median age 21.2 years [range, 12-49.5]). The primary sport group was performing arts (45%, 92/206). Mean Beighton score was 5.2 (SD, 2.5) with 61% (129/206) of hips exhibiting hypermobility (Beighton score ≥5). For each additional unit of Beighton score, N US measurement increased by 0.7 mm (β = 0.7; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.22-1.25; P < .001), NF by 1 mm ( β = 0.9; 95% CI = 0.3-1.43; P = .002) and EER by 0.8 mm ( β = 0.8; 95% CI = 0.27-1.37; P < .001) when adjusting for age and dysplasia status. A positive correlation was detected between NF (r = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.33; P = .007) and EER (r = 0.19; 95% CI = 0.05-0.32; P = .01) with Tönnis angle and a negative correlation between the delta and femoral version (r = -0.20; 95% CI = -0.35 to 0.03; P = .02). No difference in US measures was detected across sport groups (N [P = .24], NF [P = .51], EER [P = .20], delta [P = .07]).

CONCLUSION

Beighton score was independently associated with dynamic US measures in female athlete patients who are not hypermobile when controlling for other factors.

Does Femoral Head Translation Vary by Sex and Side in Asymptomatic Hips During a Weightbearing Apprehension Test?

BACKGROUND

Hip microinstability is an increasingly recognized source of pain and dysfunction but has no agreed upon diagnostic criteria and the pathophysiology remains unclear. It has been suggested that pain associated with microinstability is caused by excess translation of the femoral head. Recent research indicates that single-plane femoral head translation can be reliably measured using dynamic ultrasonography during a supine clinical examination; however, the overall accuracy of that technique has not been established, and the range of femoral head translation values that are found in individuals with no history of surgery or symptomatic pathology is unknown.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) How much femoral head translation is present in native, uninjured hips during a weightbearing apprehension position for females and males? (2) How large is the side-to-side difference in hip translation and rotation within the same individual in females and males with no history of surgery or pain during the weightbearing apprehension position? (3) What differences exist in femoral head translation and rotation when comparing females to males?

METHODS

Twenty-two young adults (11 males, 11 females; mean age 22 ± 2 years; BMI 22 ± 5 kg/m2) with no history of hip pain, no known hip injury, and who never had hip surgery participated in this study. High-resolution CT images of the femur and pelvis were acquired for each participant, and the bone tissue was segmented from the CT volume. Synchronized biplane radiographs were collected during a neutral standing trial and during a static weightbearing apprehension position in which the participant extended, externally rotated, and abducted at their back hip while standing with their feet split in the AP direction. A validated volumetric model-based tracking technique was used to match the patient-specific bone models to the biplane radiographs with an accuracy of 0.3 mm for translation and 0.8° for rotation. Translation of the center of the femoral head relative to the center of the acetabulum and rotation of the femur relative to the pelvis from neutral to the weightbearing apprehension position were calculated. Sex-based differences in hip kinematics were assessed by bivariate linear regression.

RESULTS

The median (range) translation during the weightbearing apprehension position in females was 0.9 mm (0.2 to 2.7 mm), which was less than in the 1.3 mm (0.2 to 2.6 mm) translation found in males (median difference of 0.5 mm; p = 0.04). The median absolute side-to-side difference in translation during the pivot was 1.4 mm (0.1 to 3.8 mm) in females and 1.3 mm (0.1 to 4.4 mm) in males.

CONCLUSION

These findings demonstrate that the femoral head translates the same under bodyweight loading as previously observed during supine exam, showing the inherent stability of the hip with no history of surgery or symptomatic pathology. This study also provides normal values for comparison with individuals who have suspected microinstability. Future directions for research include directly comparing biplane radiography to alternative imaging techniques, such as dynamic ultrasound, for identifying hip microinstability and identifying threshold values for symptomatic hip microinstability.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, prognostic study.

Protocol for a multicenter prospective cohort study evaluating arthroscopic and non-surgical treatment for microinstability of the hip joint

BACKGROUND

Microinstability of the hip joint is a proposed cause of hip pain and reduced function in young individuals. The underlying mechanism is thought to be extraphysiological hip motion due to bony deficiency and/or soft tissue deficiency or decreased soft tissue function. Recently, the condition has gained increased attention, and despite the fact that treatment today includes both non-surgical and surgical approaches, there is limited evidence on diagnostic specificity and treatment effects. The aim of this study is to evaluate clinical outcomes of both non-surgical and surgical treatment for microinstability of the hip joint.

METHODS

A multicenter prospective cohort study is planned to evaluating the outcome of physical therapy aimed at stabilizing the hip joint, as well as arthroscopic plication of the hip joint capsule, if the physical therapy fails. Outcomes will be evaluated using hip-specific patient-reported outcome measures: the short version of the International Hip Outcome Tool and the Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score, strength and function tests, health-related quality of life as determined using the European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions and the European Quality of Life-Visual Analog Scale, sports activity levels according to the Hip Sport Activity Scale, and reported complications. Patients will be evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after each treatment.

DISCUSSION

It is important to evaluate the clinical outcomes of both non-surgical and surgical treatment for suspected microinstability of the hip joint, and the planned prospective evaluation will contribute to the understanding of non-surgical as well as surgical treatment outcomes, including complications.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT04934462 . Registered June 22 2021.

Physical Examination of the Hip: Assessment of Femoroacetabular Impingement, Labral Pathology, and Microinstability

Purpose of Review

Determining the correct diagnosis can be challenging in patients presenting with hip pain. The physical examination is an essential tool that can aid in diagnosis of hip pathology. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated summary of recent literature on the physical exam of the hip, particularly as it relates to diagnosis of femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) syndrome, labral injury, and hip microinstability.

Recent Findings

Physical exam findings consistent with the diagnosis of FAI include reduced supine hip internal rotation and positive flexion-adduction-internal rotation maneuvers. Labral tears can be detected on exam with the Scour test. Studies demonstrate altered hip biomechanics in patients with FAI during activities such as walking and squatting. Those with FAI have slower squat velocities, slower sit-to-stand tests, and increased hip flexion moments during ambulation. Hip microinstability is a dynamic process, which can occur after prior hip arthroscopy. For hip microinstability, the combination of the three following positive tests (anterior apprehension, abduction-extension-external rotation, and prone external rotation) is associated with a 95% likelihood of microinstability as confirmed by examination under anesthesia at the time of surgery.

Summary

A comprehensive hip physical exam involves evaluation of the hip in multiple positions and assessing hip range of motion, strength, as well as performing provocative testing. A combination of physical exam maneuvers is necessary to accurately diagnose FAI syndrome and labral pathology as individual tests vary in their sensitivity and specificity. While an elevated level of suspicion is needed to diagnose hip microinstability, the provocative tests for microinstability are highly specific.

Femoroacetabular translation in female athletes and dancers assessed by dynamic hip ultrasonography

Objective

To compare femoroacetabular (FA) translation between dancers and athletes with hip pain and between dancers with and without hip pain.

Methods

In this cross-sectional study, 171 female athletes and dancers with hip pain underwent dynamic hip ultrasound (DHUS) of FA translation in three positions: neutral (N), neutral with contralateral hip flexion (NF), apprehension position with contralateral hip flexion (EER-F). Multivariable linear regression analysis was used to assess variation in FA translation between dancers and athletes in the presence of age, Beighton score/hypermobility, BMI, radiographic markers of acetabular dysplasia and femoral version angles. Symptomatic dancers were matched to asymptomatic dancer controls on age, height and BMI, and comparison analyses of FA translation were conducted controlling for matched propensity score and Beighton score.

Results

In the symptomatic cohort, dancers were younger, had higher Beighton scores and were more hypermobile than non-dancers. Dancers also showed greater NF, EER-F and max US–min US (delta) compared with non-dancers (mean 5.4 mm vs 4.4 mm, p=0.02; mean 6.3 mm vs 5.2 mm, p=0.01; 4.2 mm vs 3.6 mm, p=0.03, respectively). Symptomatic dancers showed greater NF and EER-F compared with asymptomatic dancers (mean 5.5 mm vs 2.9 mm, p<0.001; mean 6.3 mm vs 4.2 mm, p<0.001, respectively). Comparison of symptomatic dancers with and without hip dysplasia showed no difference in DHUS measurements.

Conclusion

DHUS measurements of FA translation are greater in female dancers with hip pain relative to female non-dancer athletes with hip pain and asymptomatic female dancers.

Evaluating lower limb kinematics and pathology with dynamic CT

Evaluating musculoskeletal conditions of the lower limb and understanding the pathophysiology of complex bone kinematics is challenging. Static images do not take into account the dynamic component of relative bone motion and muscle activation. Fluoroscopy and dynamic MRI have important limitations. Dynamic CT (4D-CT) is an emerging alternative that combines high spatial and temporal resolution, with an increased availability in clinical practice. 4D-CT allows simultaneous visualization of bone morphology and joint kinematics. This unique combination makes it an ideal tool to evaluate functional disorders of the musculoskeletal system. In the lower limb, 4D-CT has been used to diagnose femoroacetabular impingement, patellofemoral, ankle and subtalar joint instability, or reduced range of motion. 4D-CT has also been used to demonstrate the effect of surgery, mainly on patellar instability. 4D-CT will need further research and validation before it can be widely used in clinical practice. We believe, however, it is here to stay, and will become a reference in the diagnosis of lower limb conditions and the evaluation of treatment options. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(5):822-827.

Microinstability of the hip: a systematic review of the imaging findings

OBJECTIVES

To undertake a systematic review of the morphologic features associated with hip microinstability and determine whether there are suggestive or diagnostic imaging findings.

METHODS

Four electronic databases were searched up to September 2019 to identify original research reporting morphologic features in individuals with either a clinical diagnosis of hip microinstability (instability without overt subluxation/dislocation) or those with symptomatic laxity demonstrated on imaging (increased femoral head translation/distraction or capsular volume). Studies focussing on individuals with pre-existing hip conditions (including definite dysplasia (lateral centre edge angle < 20°), significant trauma, previous dislocation or surgery were excluded. Methodological quality was assessed by the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 tool.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies met inclusion criteria (clinical diagnosis of microinstability n = 15 and demonstration of laxity n = 7). Imaging information gathered from the studies includes radiographs (n = 14), MRI (n = 6), MR arthrography (n = 4), CT (n = 1) and intraoperative examination. Most studies exhibited design features associated with an overall high or unclear risk of bias. Some dysplastic features are associated with microinstability or laxity reference measures; however, microinstability is frequently diagnosed in those with a lateral centre edge angle > 25°. Other associated imaging findings reported include impingement morphology, anterior labral tearing, femoral head chondral injury, ligamentum teres tears and capsular attenuation.

CONCLUSIONS

The current literature does not provide strong evidence for imaging features diagnostic of microinstability. In the appropriate clinical context, dysplastic morphology, anterior labral tears and ligamentum teres tears may be suggestive of this condition although further research is needed to confirm this.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION

CRD42019122406.

The borderline dysplastic hip: when and how is it abnormal?

Borderline acetabular dysplasia refers to mildly sub-normal patterns of acetabular shape and coverage that might predispose children to mechanical dysfunction and instability. Borderline dysplasia generally includes children with a lateral center edge angle (CEA) of 18-24°. Some children with borderline radiographic measurements have normal joint mechanics and function while others benefit from acetabular reorienting surgery. Although radiographic findings of borderline dysplasia might suggest instability, the ultimate diagnosis is based on history and physical exam in addition to imaging. Children with borderline acetabular dysplasia sometimes benefit from other cross-sectional imaging studies such as MR imaging to evaluate for secondary evidence of instability, including damage along the acetabular rim, or labral degeneration and hypertrophy. CT is also helpful for depiction of 3-D acetabular morphology for preoperative assessment and planning. Pediatric radiologists are often the first to identify borderline or mild dysplasia on radiographs. It is imperative that pediatric radiologists serve as effective consultants and offer appropriate recommendations as part of a cohesive multidisciplinary approach to this complex patient population.